Skip to main content

Development of a rapid recombinase polymerase amplification assay for the detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae in whole blood



Streptococcus pneumoniae is an important cause of microbial disease in humans. The introduction of multivalent vaccines has coincided with a dramatic decrease in the number of pneumococcal-related deaths. In spite of this, at a global level, pneumococcal infection remains an important cause of death among children under 5 years of age and in adults 65 years of age or older. In order to properly manage patients and control the spread of infection, a rapid and highly sensitive diagnostic method is needed for routine implementation, especially in resource-limited regions where pneumococcal disease is most prevalent.


Using the gene encoding leader peptidase A as a molecular diagnostics target, a real-time RPA assay was designed and optimised for the detection of S. pneumoniae in whole blood. The performance of the assay was compared to real-time PCR in terms of its analytical limit of detection and specificity. The inhibitory effect of human genomic DNA on amplification was investigated. The potential clinical utility of the assay was investigated using a small number of clinical samples.


The RPA assay has a limit of detection equivalent to PCR (4.0 and 5.1 genome equivalents per reaction, respectively) and was capable of detecting the equivalent of <1 colony forming unit of S. pneumoniae when spiked into human whole blood. The RPA assay was 100 % inclusive (38/38 laboratory reference strains and 19/19 invasive clinical isolates) and 100 % exclusive; differentiating strains of S. pneumoniae species from other viridans group streptococci, including S. pseudopneumoniae. When applied to the analysis of a small number (n = 11) of clinical samples (blood culture positive for S. pneumoniae), the RPA assay was demonstrated to be both rapid and sensitive.


The RPA assay developed in this work is shown to be as sensitive and as specific as PCR. In terms of reaction kinetics, the RPA assay is shown to exceed those of the PCR, with the RPA running to completion in 20 minutes and capable generating a positive signal in as little as 6 minutes. This work represents a potentially suitable assay for application in point-of-care settings.

Peer Review reports


Streptococcus pneumoniae is a major cause of human disease. It is estimated that more than 1.6 million people, including more than 800,000 children under the age of 5, die every year from pneumococcal infections [1]. In addition to its role as a leading cause of community-acquired pneumonia, S. pneumoniae is a causative agent of a variety of other infections, including otitis media, blood stream infection, spontaneous peritonitis and meningitis [2]. Pneumococcal meningitis is a form of pneumococcal disease associated with significant mortality and morbidity in children. In developed countries, pneumococcal meningitis has a mortality rate of 17–30 % [3] and an associated risk of sequelae of 32 % [4]. In developing countries, the mortality and morbidity rates are much higher [5]. S. pneumoniae belongs to the mitis subgroup of alpha-haemolytic (viridans) streptococci (VGS). Mitis group streptococci other than S. pneumoniae are also associated with bacteraemia which may be clinically non-significant but may also be associated with invasive disease, particularly in predisposed patients such as the immunocompromised and those with cardiac valve damage [6]. The mitis group organisms, S. mitis, S. oralis and S. pseudopneumoniae, possess >99 % 16S rRNA sequence homology with S. pneumoniae [7]. Furthermore, horizontal gene transfer between streptococci can give rise to atypical streptococci that are difficult to classify using phenotypic methods [8]. Given the close genotypic and phenotypic relationship between mitis group streptococci, the differentiation of pneumococcus from other VGS is challenging [9].

Culture based methods are the gold standard for diagnosing invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD). However culture based methods typically require at least several hours to a day or more incubation before an organism is detected. Furthermore, these methods often demonstrate limited diagnostic sensitivity, particularly post antibiotic treatment or in cases with low sample volume, as is often the case with children [10, 11]. Molecular amplification methods such as PCR and Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) have been used to diagnose IPD [12, 13] . These methods are reported as sensitive, are not reliant on having viable organisms and have the potential to deliver more rapid results.

Recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) is an isothermal in vitro nucleic acid amplification technology that uses a combination of recombinase protein, oligonucleotide primers and a strand displacing polymerase to amplify DNA sequences [14]. RPA is sensitive, rapid, specific and robust (less sensitive to inhibitors than PCR). RPA has been applied to the detection of a wide variety of bacterial, viral and eukaryotic molecular targets [1522]. The use of a fluorescent probe enables monitoring of reactions in real-time and multiplexing capabilities. Isothermal amplification strategies are of great interest in molecular diagnostics, as they negate the need for thermocycling, as is the case for PCR. The isothermal nature of these techniques makes them suitable for incorporation into devices capable of being deployed at the point-of-care.

Molecular targets that have been used to identify S. pneumoniae include a variety of genes, including the Spn9802 fragment [23], the RecA gene [24] the 16S rRNA gene [25], and virulence factor genes, such as autolysin (lytA) [26] and pneumolysin (ply) [27, 28]. Whilst these targets have proven useful for the detection of S. pneumoniae, their ability to unequivocally identify S. pneumoniae remains problematic. For example, false positives can occur with the lytA marker [29] and both ply [30] and Spn9802 [23] are associated with false negative results. Leader peptidase A (LepA), also known as Elongation Factor 4 (EF4), is one of the most conserved bacterial proteins and is found in virtually all know genomes [31]. It functions as a ribosome dependant GTPase, with the ability to back-translocate post-translocational ribosomes and increase the active fraction of newly translated proteins [3234]. Its utility as a diagnostic marker has been previously demonstrated in a multiplex assay for the detection of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTC) [35, 36].

In this study, we have developed and performed a preliminary evaluation of a real-time RPA assay based on the LepA gene for the detection of S. pneumoniae. We also developed a LepA based S. pneumoniae real-time PCR assay to compare in terms of specificity and sensitivity.


Bacterial strains and growth conditions

S. pneumoniae bacterial reference strains (n = 8), non-S. pneumoniae reference strains (n = 54) and invasive S. pneumoniae clinical isolates (n = 19) were evaluated in this study (Table 1). All strains were cultured overnight in brain heart infusion (BHI) medium (Oxoid, UK) at 37 °C. For enumeration, 100 μL of serially diluted bacterial suspensions were spread plated on Columbia blood agar and incubated for 24 hrs.

Table 1 Bacterial strains and reactivity in the RPA and PCR assays

DNA extraction

Following overnight culture, bacterial genomic DNA was extracted and purified using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen, Germany) according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Following purification, DNA was quantified by fluorescence (Qubit DNA BR Assay, Life technologies, UK). Genome equivalents (GE) were calculated based on an assumed genome size of 2.1 Mb [37]. For whole blood spiking experiments, from an overnight culture, the culture medium was 10-fold serially diluted in BHI. 2 μL of the serially diluted bacterial suspensions, were spiked into 98 μL of fresh human whole blood. Subsequently, total genomic DNA was extracted and purified using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen, Germany) according to the manufacturers’ instructions, with the exception that DNA was eluted in 20 μL H20 (rather than 200 μL buffer AE).

Primer and probe design

LepA sequences were obtained from GenBank (, and the Functional Gene Pipeline and Repository (FunGene; website. Sequences were aligned using the multiple sequence alignment tool ClustalW [38]. Following alignment, S. pneumoniae specific PCR and RPA primers and probes were manually designed (Table 2). The sequences were finally screened for homology using the BLASTn algorithm ( to confirm their specificity. All oligonucleotide primers and probes were purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies (Leuven, Belgium), with the exception of the RPA probe, which was purchased from Biosearch Technologies (Petaluma, California, USA).

Table 2 Nucleic Acid sequences of primers and probes

Real-time recombinase polymerase amplification

RPA reactions were performed using the TwistAmp Exo® kit (TwistDx, Cambridge, UK) and contained: 1 x rehydration buffer, 4 μL forward and reverse primer (6 μM each), 4 μL probe (6 μM) and 1 μL genomic DNA as the amplification template. To initiate the reaction, 14 mM magnesium acetate (2.5 μL at a concentration of 280 mM) was added. Reactions were performed in a total volume of 50 μL at 40 °C in a portable real-time fluorometer (Twista®, TwistDx) for 20 minutes with a mixing and centrifugation step after the first 4 minutes. External negative and positive amplification controls were included in each run. The positive amplification control consisted of 100 GE of the S. pneumoniae type strain (DSM 20566) diluted in molecular grade water. The no-template control (NTC) consisted of molecular grade water.

Real-time PCR

All real-time PCR assays were performed using a LightCycler® 480 real-time PCR instrument (Roche Diagnostics, UK). PCR reactions were performed in 200 μL 12-well optical strips (BIOplastics BV, The Netherlands) in a total volume of 20 μL. Each reaction consisted of 1 x LightCycler Probes Master mix (Roche Diagnostics, UK), 10pmoles each primer and 5pmoles of probe and 1 μL genomic DNA as the amplification template. Negative and positive amplification controls were included in each run. The positive amplification control consisted of 100 GE of the S. pneumoniae type strain (DSM 20566) diluted in molecular grade water. The no template control (NTC) consisted of molecular grade water. The cycling parameters consisted of 1 cycle of 95 °C for 5mins followed by 45 cycles of 95 °C for 10s, 60 °C for 15 s and 72 °C for 1 s.

Specificity analysis/determination

The specificity of both the RPA and PCR assays were evaluated. Genomic DNA (5 × 104 GE) from a panel of Streptococcus and non-Streptococcus organisms (see Table 1) was tested in both RPA and PCR amplification assays.

Sensitivity analysis/determination

The analytical limit of detection (95 % confidence level) of the PCR and RPA assays were determined. S. pneumoniae (DSM 20566) genomic DNA was diluted in molecular grade water to 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, or 1 GE per microliter. PCR and RPA reactions were then performed using 1 μL of the diluted DNA as the amplification template. Reactions were performed in replicates of twelve and the subsequent data was analysed statistically (Probit, Minitab, Version 16).

Evaluation of inhibition of RPA by human DNA

In order to determine the limit of background human DNA tolerated by the RPA and PCR reactions, varying quantities of human genomic DNA (100, 200 and 400 ng) were added to reactions containing 50, 20 or 4 S. pneumoniae (DSM 20566) GE.

Blood spiking experiments

Human whole blood was collected from a healthy volunteer in EDTA vacutainers (Becton Dickinson and Company, Ireland). Two microliters of 10-fold serially diluted bacterial suspensions (over five orders of magnitude) were spiked into 98 μL of fresh (within 1 hr of sampling) human whole blood. Aliquots (100 μL) of the serially diluted bacterial suspensions were plated on blood agar for enumeration. The spiked blood samples were then processed immediately to extract DNA. From the eluted DNA (20 μL), 1 μL was then subjected to RPA or PCR amplification.

Clinical sample analysis using RPA and PCR

Whole blood was collected in EDTA blood tubes from patients attending Galway University Hospital, suspected of a bloodstream infection for routine full blood count and from healthy volunteers. Generally, within 24 hours of collection of patient blood, residual material was collected, anonymised and then stored at −80 °C. Blood collected from the healthy volunteers was also stored at −80 °C. Subsequently, the samples were thawed on ice and total genomic DNA was extracted from 100 μL of sample and eluted in 20 μL molecular grade water as described previously. For analysis, 1 μL or 5 μL of the eluted genomic DNA was subjected to amplification by RPA and PCR.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval for this study was granted by the Ethics Committee of the Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland. Participants were selected on the basis of having blood cultures submitted to the Department of Medical Microbiology for detection of blood stream infection. Following full blood count, patients for whom residual EDTA blood samples were available were recruited into the study based on the results of the blood culture (confirmed positive for the presence of S. pneumoniae). For controls, blood was collected from healthy individuals, following informed consent.


Analytical specificity

The analytical specificities of both the RPA and real-time PCR assays were determined and are shown in Table 1. Both assays detected the 3 S. pneumoniae references strains tested. Both assays also detected all invasive clinical isolates (n = 19). Of the 39 other Streptococcus and non-Streptococcus species that were tested, none were detected by either of the assays, indicating the analytical specificity of the assays (Table 1, Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

RPA assay specificity. The graph shows the fluorescence intensity of an assay containing 100 genome equivalents (GE) of S. pneumoniae (type strain; DSM20566), 5 x 104 GE of 6 streptococcus species and a no template control (NTC)

Analytical limit of detection

Genomic DNA was serially diluted (100–1 GE per reaction) in water and subjected to RPA. Initial experiments suggested that the RPA was capable of detecting 1 GE per reaction (Fig. 2). Subsequently, the analytical limit of detection of both the RPA and real-time PCR assays were measured by testing 12 replicates of serially diluted genomic DNA from the S. pneumoniae type strain (DSM 20566). The analytical limit of detection (95 % confidence level) of the RPA and PCR assays was established to be 4.1 and 5.1 GE per reaction, respectively. Table 3 outlines the number of reactions producing a positive result for each template quantity.

Fig. 2

RPA assay sensitivity. The graph shows the fluorescence intensity obtained from the amplification of 100, 50, 25, 10 and 1 genome equivalents of S. pneumoniae (type strain; DSM20566). A no template control (NTC) reaction is also shown

Table 3 Analytical sensitivity

Assessment of inhibition and detection in whole blood

The degree to which the RPA reaction was inhibited by the presence of human DNA was concentration dependant, varying from no significant inhibition (100 ng; data not shown) to substantial inhibition in the presence of 400 ng human DNA (the highest tested). Whilst inhibited, when spiked with 200 ng or 400 ng of human DNA, 50, 20 and 4 S. pneumoniae GE were detected, all producing signals above that of the negative control reaction (Fig. 3). When the PCR reaction was spiked with human DNA (100, 200 or 400 ng/reaction), there was no discernible shift in threshold-cycle between spiked and non-spiked reactions, indicating that the PCR was not inhibited by the presence of human DNA (data not shown).

Fig. 3

RPA assay robustness. The graphs show the fluorescence intensity obtained from the amplification of 50, 20 and 4 genome equivalents (GE) of S. pneumoniae (type strain; DSM20566), a in the absence of background human genomic DNA, b in the presence of 200 ng background human genomic DNA and c in the presence of 400 ng background human genomic DNA. Also shown in each graph is the fluorescence intensity obtained from the amplification of 100 GE (positive control, PC) of S. pneumoniae (type strain; DSM20566) and a no template control reaction (NTC)

The ability of the assays to detect S. pneumoniae spiked into whole blood from a healthy volunteer was also determined. Plate counts indicated that 0.0185, 0.185, 1.85, 18.5, 185 CFU had been spiked into 98 μL of blood. Upon extraction, total DNA was eluted into 20 μL, of which 1 μL was subjected to RPA and PCR, meaning that each reaction contained template genomic DNA from 0.000925, 0.00925, 0.0925, 0.925 or 9.25 CFU equivalents. Both the RPA and PCR assays detected 0.925 and 9.25 CFU equivalents per reaction (Fig. 4). The lower quantities (0.000925, 0.00925, 0.0925 CFU) were not detected.

Fig. 4

Blood spiking. The graph shows the fluorescence intensity obtained from the RPA of 1 μL purified DNA (9.25, 0.925 and 0.0925 CFU equivalents) extracted from whole blood spiked with varying CFU of S. pneumoniae (type strain; DSM20566). Also shown is the fluorescence intensity obtained from the amplification of 100 GE (positive control, PC) of S. pneumoniae (type strain; DSM20566) and a no template control reaction (NTC)

Detection of S. pneumoniae in clinical samples

Eleven blood samples confirmed by culture to be positive for S. pneumoniae were subjected to analysis by RPA and PCR. Both the RPA and PCR assays were positive for the same 8 of the 11 samples tested (Table 4). For the remaining 3 S. pneumoniae positive samples, 5 μL of the purified DNA was subsequently tested in the RPA and PCR assays, resulting in positive signals. Figure 5 shows representative RPA amplification curves from the resultant DNA purified from 4 confirmed positive clinical blood samples. RPA and PCR analysis of DNA extracted from the blood of four healthy (culture negative) volunteers, produced negative results.

Table 4 Analysis of clinical samples. RPA and PCR assay reactivity
Fig. 5

Analysis of clinical samples. The graph shows the fluorescence intensity from the amplification of extracted genomic DNA from 4 clinical samples previously confirmed positive for S. pneumoniae by culture. Also shown in each chart is the fluorescence intensity obtained from the amplification of 100 GE and a no template control reaction (NTC)


Some 93 polysaccharide capsular types or serotypes of S. pneumoniae have been identified [39]. The introduction of a 7-, 13-, and more recently, a 23-valent conjugate vaccine has been associated with a dramatic reduction in the number of deaths, particularly amongst children and in adults (via a herd effect) due to pneumococcal infection [40, 41]. However, pneumococcal disease remains a serious disease globally, particularly in children less than two years old, the elderly (>65 years) and in immunocompromised individuals. Thus, a robust diagnostic assay capable of the rapid, sensitive and specific detection of S. pneumoniae in near-patient settings could play a significant role in the reduction of pneumococcal disease related morbidity and mortality, particularly in developing countries.

Isothermal in vitro nucleic acid amplification strategies are of great interest in molecular diagnostics, as they negate the need for thermocycling, as is the case for PCR. In PCR, thermocycling is required to facilitate the separation of double-stranded DNA to enable amplification. The major isothermal amplification techniques currently utilised include: Nucleic Acid Sequence based Amplification (NASBA) [42], Transcription Mediated Amplification (TMA) [43], Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) [44], Helicase Dependant Amplification (HDA) [45], Rolling Circle Amplification (RCA) [46] and Strand Displacement Amplification (SDA) [47]. Of these, NASBA, TMA, RCA and SDA cannot be considered truly isothermal as they require an initial heating step to denature the target nucleic acid prior to amplification. RPA, HDA and LAMP can be considered truly isothermal, as there is no requirement for a denaturation step to initiate amplification. The operating temperature of LAMP is typically 60–65 °C, at which temperature the nucleic acid target is in dynamic equilibrium, enabling the binding of primers to their target sequence and subsequent amplification. Whilst LAMP is inexpensive to perform, primer design is complex and multiplex amplification is at present difficult. Both HDA and RPA use proteins to facilitate the binding of primers to their respective template and both technologies enable multiplex amplification. The major advantage of RPA over other competing isothermal amplification technologies is its speed, being capable of amplifying single-digit copy numbers of nucleic acids to detectable levels in 5–10 minutes.

In this study, we have developed real-time RPA and real-time PCR assays for the detection of S. pneumoniae using primers and probes targeting the LepA gene. We examined the ability of both assays to detect S. pneumoniae spiked into human whole blood. Finally, we applied both assays to the detection of S. pneumoniae directly in the blood of 11 patients confirmed positive for infection by blood culture.

Both RPA and PCR assays were highly specific, with all laboratory strains (n = 8) and clinical isolates of S. pneumoniae (n = 19) positively identified. Both assays were negative for all non-S. pneumoniae organisms (n = 39) assayed. These data support the results of our in silico analysis, demonstrating that the LepA gene has sufficient sequence heterogeneity to enable the specific detection of S. pneumoniae. Probit regression analysis was used to calculate (with 95 % confidence) the analytical LOD of both assays. The RPA assay had a marginally better LOD than the PCR assay (4.0 and 5.1 GE respectively). Assuming Poisson distribution, both assays demonstrated limits of detection approaching 3 molecules, the most sensitive LOD theoretically possible [48]. It should also be noted that the RPA reactions were performed in volumes of 50 μL, 250 % greater than the 20 μL PCR reactions, suggesting that by reducing the reaction volume and thereby increasing the effective concentration of the initial template DNA, the assay sensitivity could be further improved.

RPA is a rapid isothermal in vitro nucleic acid amplification technology. When 10 S. pneumoniae GE were used as the template for amplification, our RPA assay produced a positive signal in as little as 5 mins. This is in contrast to 35 cycles (approximately 20mins), which was required to produce a positive signal in our PCR assay for the equivalent template quantity.

Prior to performing our spiking experiments we investigated what affect the presence of background human DNA had on the RPA assay performance. We found that in the presence of 400 ng background DNA (the highest quantity tested), although considerably inhibited, the RPA assay was capable of detecting 50, 20 and 4 GE, all giving signals above the no template control reaction. In the presence of 200 ng of background human DNA, the RPA assay was also inhibited, but to a much lesser degree than in the presence of 400 ng DNA. According to the DNA extraction kit manufacturer (Qiagen), 3–6 μg is the typical yield of genomic DNA obtained from 100 μL of mammalian blood. The DNA we used for the inhibition studies was extracted using the DNeasy blood and tissue kit and yields were in this range (data not shown). Assuming the average yield is 4.5 μg DNA /100 μL blood, and considering that we eluted our extracted DNA into 20 μL, of which 1 μL is subjected to RPA, the quantity of background human DNA in the RPA reaction is approximately 225 ng. We also tested the effect of background human DNA on the PCR assay and found that the reaction was not inhibited, even in the presence of 400 ng of background DNA.

When spiked into whole blood, both PCR and RPA assays were capable of detecting 0.925 CFU/reaction, which equals 18.5 CFU equivalents/100 μL blood. Reactions in the blood spiking experiment were performed in duplicate and subsequently repeated to verify this result. Peter et al. (2009) developed a real-time PCR assay targeting the autolysin gene capable of detecting the equivalent of 125 CFU in 1 mL whole blood [49]. It should be noted, that CFU is an estimate of the number of viable organisms present. CFU as a metric does not account for the presence of dead, non-viable cells or for organisms that tend to form clumps or grow as pairs or chains and may well substantially underestimate the number of living cells in a sample [50].

To further evaluate our RPA assay, we tested a small number of S. pneumoniae culture positive (n = 11) and culture negative (obtained from consenting volunteers) blood samples (n = 4). All culture positive samples resulted in positive signals when analysed by RPA and PCR amplifications while the four culture negative samples were RPA and PCR negative. Eight of the 11 culture positive samples produced positive signals for RPA and PCR when tested with 1 μL of purified DNA. The remaining three that tested negative using 1 μL of purified DNA, were then tested using 5 μL of purified DNA in both assays, with both assays producing positive signals. This result hints at a reduced bacterial DNA load or the presence of RPA and PCR reaction inhibitors in the 3 of the 11 culture positive samples in question. This may have been the result of lower bacterial cell load in the samples, DNA degradation due to extended sample processing time during sample acquisition.


We have developed a sensitive and specific real-time RPA and a real-time PCR assay for the detection of S. pneumoniae in clinical blood samples. We have shown this assay to be as specific and as, sensitive as PCR when applied to the detection of S. pneumoniae using the LepA gene as a diagnostics target. This assay may find utility as a rapid point-of-care diagnostic test for the detection of S. pneumoniae. Future work will focus on the development of an internal amplification control for the assay and increasing the number of clinical samples to fully validate the RPA assay.


  1. 1.

    O’Brien KL, Wolfson LJ, Watt JP, Henkle E, Deloria-Knoll M, McCall N, et al. Burden of disease caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae in children younger than 5 years: global estimates. Lancet. 2009;374(9693):893–902. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61204-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Kadioglu A, Weiser JN, Paton JC, Andrew PW. The role of Streptococcus pneumoniae virulence factors in host respiratory colonization and disease. Nat Rev Micro. 2008;6(4):288–301. doi:10.1038/nrmicro1871.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Erdem H, Elaldi N, Öztoprak N, Sengoz G, Ak O, Kaya S, et al. Mortality indicators in pneumococcal meningitis: therapeutic implications. Int J Infect Dis. 2014;19:13–9. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2013.09.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Jit M. The risk of sequelae due to pneumococcal meningitis in high-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect. 2010;61(2):114–24. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2013.09.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Maimaiti N, Ahmed Z, Md Isa Z, Ghazi HF, Aljunid S. Clinical Burden of Invasive Pneumococcal Disease in Selected Developing Countries. Value in Health Regional Issues. 2013;2(2):259–63. doi:10.1016/j.vhri.2013.07.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Whatmore AM, Efstratiou A, Pickerill AP, Broughton K, Woodard G, Sturgeon D, et al. Genetic Relationships between Clinical Isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus oralis, and Streptococcus mitis: Characterization of “Atypical” Pneumococci and Organisms Allied to S. mitis Harboring S. pneumoniae Virulence Factor-Encoding Genes. Infect Immun. 2000;68(3):1374–82. doi:10.1128/iai.68.3.1374-1382.2000.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Suzuki N, Seki M, Nakano Y, Kiyoura Y, Maeno M, Yamashita Y. Discrimination of Streptococcus pneumoniae from Viridans Group Streptococci by Genomic Subtractive Hybridization. J Clin Micro. 2005;43(9):4528–34. doi:10.1128/jcm.43.9.4528-4534.2005.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Simmon KE, Hall L, Woods CW, Marco F, Miro JM, Cabell C, et al. Phylogenetic Analysis of Viridans Group Streptococci Causing Endocarditis. J Clin Micro. 2008;46(9):3087–90. doi:10.1128/jcm.00920-08.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Arbique JC, Poyart C, Trieu-Cuot P, Quesne G, Carvalho MGS, Steigerwalt AG, et al. Accuracy of Phenotypic and Genotypic Testing for Identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Description of Streptococcus pseudopneumoniae sp. nov. J Clin Micro. 2004;42(10):4686–96. doi:10.1128/jcm.42.10.4686-4696.2004.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Smith MD, Derrington P, Evans R, Creek M, Morris R, Dance DAB, et al. Rapid Diagnosis of Bacteremic Pneumococcal Infections in Adults by Using the Binax NOW Streptococcus pneumoniae Urinary Antigen Test: a Prospective, Controlled Clinical Evaluation. J Clin Micro. 2003;41(7):2810–3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Michelow IC, Lozano J, Olsen K, Goto C, Rollins NK, Ghaffar F, et al. Diagnosis of Streptococcus pneumoniae Lower Respiratory Infection in Hospitalized Children by Culture, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Serological Testing, and Urinary Antigen Detection. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34(1):e1–e11. doi:10.1086/324358.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Seki M, Yamashita Y, Torigoe H, Tsuda H, Sato S, Maeno M. Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Method Targeting the lytA Gene for Detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Clin Micro. 2005;43(4):1581–6. doi:10.1128/jcm.43.4.1581-1586.2005.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Corless CE, Guiver M, Borrow R, Edwards-Jones V, Fox AJ, Kaczmarski EB. Simultaneous Detection of Neisseria meningitidis, Haemophilus influenzae, and Streptococcus pneumoniae in Suspected Cases of Meningitis and Septicemia Using Real-Time PCR. J Clin Micro. 2001;39(4):1553–8. doi:10.1128/jcm.39.4.1553-1558.2001.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Piepenburg O, Williams CH, Stemple DL, Armes NA. DNA Detection Using Recombination Proteins. PLoS Biol. 2006;4(7):e204. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040204.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Murinda SE, Ibekwe AM, Zulkaffly S, Cruz A, Park S, Razak N, et al. Real-Time Isothermal Detection of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Using Recombinase Polymerase Amplification. Foodborne Path Dis. 2014;11(7):529–36. doi:10.1089/fpd.2013.1663.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ahmed A, van der Linden H, Hartskeerl RA. Development of a Recombinase Polymerase Amplification Assay for the Detection of Pathogenic Leptospira. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11(5):4953–64. doi:10.3390/ijerph110504953.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Krolov K, Frolova J, Tudoran O, Suhorutsenko J, Lehto T, Sibul H, et al. Sensitive and Rapid Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by Recombinase Polymerase Amplification Directly from Urine Samples. J Mol Diag. 2014;16(1):127–35. doi:10.1016/j.jmoldx.2013.08.003.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Loo JFC, Lau PM, Ho HP, Kong SK. An aptamer-based bio-barcode assay with isothermal recombinase polymerase amplification for cytochrome-c detection and anti-cancer drug screening. Talanta. 2013;115:159–65. doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2013.04.051.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Euler M, Wang Y, Heidenreich D, Patel P, Strohmeier O, Hakenberg S, et al. Development of a Panel of Recombinase Polymerase Amplification Assays for Detection of Biothreat Agents. J Clin Micro. 2013;51(4):1110–7. doi:10.1128/jcm.02704-12.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Daher RK, Stewart G, Boissinot M, Bergeron MG. Isothermal Recombinase Polymerase Amplification Assay Applied to the Detection of Group B Streptococci in Vaginal/Anal Samples. Clin Chem. 2014;60(4):660–6. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2013.213504.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Amer HM, Abd El Wahed A, Shalaby MA, Almajhdi FN, Hufert FT, Weidmann M. A new approach for diagnosis of bovine coronavirus using a reverse transcription recombinase polymerase amplification assay. J Virol Meth. 2013;193(2):337–40. doi:10.1016/j.jviromet.2013.06.027.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Abd El Wahed A, El-Deeb A, El-Tholoth M, Abd El Kader H, Ahmed A, Hassan S et al. A Portable Reverse Transcription Recombinase Polymerase Amplification Assay for Rapid Detection of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus. Plos One. 2013;8(8). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071642.

  23. 23.

    Abdeldaim GMK, Strålin K, Olcén P, Blomberg J, Herrmann B. Toward a quantitative DNA-based definition of pneumococcal pneumonia: a comparison of Streptococcus pneumoniae target genes, with special reference to the Spn9802 fragment. Diag Micro Infect Dis. 2008;60(2):143–50. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2007.08.010.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Zbinden A, Köhler N, Bloemberg GV. recA-Based PCR Assay for Accurate Differentiation of Streptococcus pneumoniae from Other Viridans Streptococci. J Clin Micro. 2011;49(2):523–7. doi:10.1128/jcm.01450-10.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    El Aila N, Emler S, Kaijalainen T, De Baere T, Saerens B, Alkan E, et al. The development of a 16S rRNA gene based PCR for the identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae and comparison with four other species specific PCR assays. BMC Infect Dis. 2010;10(1):104. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-10-104.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Sheppard CL, Harrison TG, Morris R, Hogan A, George RC. Autolysin-targeted LightCycler assay including internal process control for detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae DNA in clinical samples. J Med Micro. 2004;53(3):189–95. doi:10.1099/jmm.0.05460-0.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Lorente MLL, Falguera M, Nogués A, González AR, Merino MT, Caballero MR. Diagnosis of pneumococcal pneumonia by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in whole blood: a prospective clinical study. Thorax. 2000;55(2):133–7. doi:10.1136/thorax.55.2.133.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Yang S, Lin S, Khalil A, Gaydos C, Nuemberger E, Juan G, et al. Quantitative PCR Assay Using Sputum Samples for Rapid Diagnosis of Pneumococcal Pneumonia in Adult Emergency Department Patients. J Clin Micro. 2005;43(7):3221–6. doi:10.1128/jcm.43.7.3221-3226.2005.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Carvalho MGS, Tondella ML, McCaustland K, Weidlich L, McGee L, Mayer LW, et al. Evaluation and Improvement of Real-Time PCR Assays Targeting lytA, ply, and psaA Genes for Detection of Pneumococcal DNA. J Clin Micro. 2007;45(8):2460–6. doi:10.1128/jcm.02498-06.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Greve T, Møller JK. Accuracy of using the lytA gene to distinguish Streptococcus pneumoniae from related species. J Med Microbiol. 2012;61(Pt 4):478–82. doi:10.1099/jmm.0.036574-0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Zhang D, Qin Y. The paradox of elongation factor 4: highly conserved, yet of no physiological significance? Biochem J. 2013;452:173–81. doi:10.1042/BJ20121792.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Pech M, Karim Z, Yamamoto H, Kitakawa M, Qin Y, Nierhaus KH. Elongation factor 4 (EF4/LepA) accelerates protein synthesis at increased Mg2+ concentrations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(8):3199–203. doi:10.1073/pnas.1012994108.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Qin Y, Polacek N, Vesper O, Staub E, Einfeldt E, Wilson DN, et al. The Highly Conserved LepA Is a Ribosomal Elongation Factor that Back-Translocates the Ribosome. Cell. 2006;127(4):721–33. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.037.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Yamamoto H, Qin Y, Achenbach J, Li C, Kijek J, Spahn CMT, et al. EF-G and EF4: translocation and back-translocation on the bacterial ribosome. Nat Rev Micro. 2013;12(2):89–100. doi:10.1038/nrmicro3176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Reddington K, O’Grady J, Dorai-Raj S, Maher M, van Soolingen D, Barry T. Novel Multiplex Real-Time PCR Diagnostic Assay for Identification and Differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Mycobacterium canettii, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex Strains. J Clin Micro. 2011;49(2):651–7. doi:10.1128/jcm.01426-10.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Reddington K, O’Grady J, Dorai-Raj S, Niemann S, van Soolingen D, Barry T. A Novel Multiplex Real-Time PCR for the Identification of Mycobacteria Associated with Zoonotic Tuberculosis. PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23481. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023481.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Donati C, Hiller NL, Tettelin H, Muzzi A, Croucher N, Angiuoli S, et al. Structure and dynamics of the pan-genome of Streptococcus pneumoniae and closely related species. Genome Biol. 2010;11(10):R107. doi:10.1186/gb-2010-11-10-r107.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(21):2947–8. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Calix JJ, Nahm MH. A New Pneumococcal Serotype, 11E, Has a Variably Inactivated wcjE Gene. J Infect Dis. 2010;202(1):29–38. doi:10.1086/653123.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Pilishvili T, Lexau C, Farley MM, Hadler J, Harrison LH, Bennett NM, et al. Sustained Reductions in Invasive Pneumococcal Disease in the Era of Conjugate Vaccine. J Infect Dis. 2010;201(1):32–41. doi:10.1086/648593.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Lexau CA, Lynfield R, Danila R, Pilishvili T, Facklam R, Farley MM, et al. Changing epidemiology of invasive pneumococcal disease among older adults in the era of pediatric pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. JAMA. 2005;294(16):2043–51. doi:10.1001/jama.294.16.2043.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Compton J. Nucleic acid sequence-based amplification. Nature. 1991;350(6313):91–2. doi:10.1038/350091a0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Brentano S, McDonough S. Isothermal Amplification of RNA by Transcription-Mediated Amplification (TMA). In: Kessler C, editor. Nonradioactive Analysis of Biomolecules. Springer Lab Manuals: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2000. p. 374–80.

  44. 44.

    Notomi T, Okayama H, Masubuchi H, Yonekawa T, Watanabe K, Amino N, et al. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(12):e63. doi:10.1093/nar/28.12.e63.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Vincent M, Xu Y, Kong H. Helicase-dependent isothermal DNA amplification. EMBO Rep. 2004;5(8):795–800. doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7400200.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Lizardi PM, Huang X, Zhu Z, Bray-Ward P, Thomas DC, Ward DC. Mutation detection and single-molecule counting using isothermal rolling-circle amplification. Nat Genet. 1998;19(3):225–32. doi:10.1038/898.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Walker GT, Fraiser MS, Schram JL, Little MC, Nadeau JG, Malinowski DP. Strand displacement amplification--an isothermal, in vitro DNA amplification technique. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992;20(7):1691–6. doi:10.1093/nar/20.7.1691.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson JA, Hellemans J, Huggett J, Kubista M, et al. The MIQE Guidelines: Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments. Clin Chem. 2009;55(4):611–22. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2008.112797.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Peters RPH, de Boer RF, Schuurman T, Gierveld S, Kooistra-Smid M, van Agtmael MA, et al. Streptococcus pneumoniae DNA Load in Blood as a Marker of Infection in Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia. J Clin Micro. 2009;47(10):3308–12. doi:10.1128/jcm.01071-09.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Wang H, Cheng H, Wei D, Wang F. Comparison of methods for measuring viable E. coli cells during cultivation: Great differences in the early and late exponential growth phases. J Microbiol Meth. 2011;84(1):140–3. doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2010.11.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by Science Foundation Ireland as part of the Biomedical Diagnostics Institute Centre for Science Excellence and Technology (10/CE/B1821).

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eoin Clancy.

Additional information

Competing interests

We declare the following competing interests; TwistDx supplied RPA reagents for the study. MSF and OP are employees of TwistDx. TB and TJS are named inventors on a patent application pertaining to the use of LepA as a diagnostics target. OP is a named inventor of Recombinase Polymerase Amplification technology.

Authors’ contributions

OH, EC, MSF, OP, TB and TJS designed the study. OH performed the experimental work. EC drafted the manuscript. TWB and MC had roles collection and analysis of clinical isolates and samples. All authors contributed to the critical review and revision of the manuscript. All authors have seen and approved the final version.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Clancy, E., Higgins, O., Forrest, M.S. et al. Development of a rapid recombinase polymerase amplification assay for the detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae in whole blood. BMC Infect Dis 15, 481 (2015).

Download citation


  • Streptococcus pneumoniae
  • Recombinase Polymerase Amplification
  • Leader peptidase A
  • Molecular diagnostics