Skip to main content
Download PDF

The importance of the bacterial spectrum in the clinical diagnostics and management of patients with spontaneous pyogenic spondylodiscitis and isolated spinal epidural empyema: a 20-year cohort study at a single spine center

BMC Infectious Diseases volume 24, Article number: 39 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Personalized clinical management of spondylodiscitis (SD) and isolated spinal epidural empyema (ISEE) is challenging due to limited evidence of microbiologic findings and their clinical impact during the clinical course of the disease. We aimed to characterize clinico-microbiological and imaging phenotypes of SD and ISEE to provide useful insights that could improve outcomes and potentially modify guidelines.

Methods

We performed chart review and collected data on the following parameters: bacterial antibiogram-resistogram, type of primary spinal infection, location of spinal infection, source of infection, method of detection, clinical complications (sepsis, septic embolism, and endocarditis), length of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay, relapse rate, and disease-related mortality in patients with proven pyogenic SD and ISEE treated surgically in a university hospital in Germany between 2002 and 2022.

Results

We included data from 187 patients (125 SD, 66.8% and 62 ISEE, 33.2%). Gram-positive bacteria (GPB) were overall more frequently detected than gram-negative bacteria (GNB) (GPB: 162, 86.6% vs. GNB: 25, 13.4%, p < 0.001). Infective endocarditis was caused only by GPB (GPB: 23, 16.5% vs. GNB: 0, 0.0%, p = 0.046). Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequently isolated strain (MSSA: n = 100, 53.5%), occurred more frequently in the cervical spine compared to other bacteria (OB) (MSSA: 41, 41.0% vs. OB: 18, 20.7%, p = 0.004) and was most frequently detected in patients with skin infection as the primary source of infection (MSSA: 26, 40.6% vs. OB: 11, 16.7%, p = 0.002). Streptococcus spp. and Enterococcus spp. (SE: n = 31, 16.6%) were more often regarded as the cause of endocarditis (SE: 8, 27.6% vs. OB: 15, 11.4%, p = 0.037) and were less frequently detected in intraoperative specimens (SE: 19, 61.3% vs. OB: 138, 88.5%, p < 0.001). Enterobacterales (E: n = 20, 10.7%) were identified more frequently in urinary tract infections (E: 9, 50.0% vs. OB: 4, 3.6%, p < 0.001). Coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CoNS: n = 20, 10.7%) were characterized by a lower prevalence of sepsis (CoNS: 4, 20.0% vs. OB: 90, 53.9%, p = 0.004) and were more frequently detected in intraoperative specimens (CoNS: 20, 100. 0% vs. OB: 137, 82.0%, p = 0.048). Moreover, CoNS-associated cases showed a shorter length of ICU stay (CoNS: 2 [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18] days vs. OB: 6 [1–53] days, median [interquartile range], p = 0.037), and occurred more frequently due to foreign body-associated infections (CoNS: 8, 61.5% vs. OB: 15, 12.8%, p = 0.008). The presence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) prolonged hospital stay by 56 [24–58] days and ICU stay by 16 [1–44] days, whereas patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa spent only 20 [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29] days in the hospital and no day in the ICU 0 [0–5] days.

Conclusions

Our retrospective cohort study identified distinct bacterial-specific manifestations in pyogenic SD and ISEE regarding clinical course, neuroanatomic targets, method of pathogen detection, and sources of infection. The clinico-microbiological patterns varied depending on the specific pathogens.

Peer Review reports

Background

Primary spinal infections (PSI) account for 2–5% of all infectious bone diseases [1,2,3] and mainly include spondylodiscitis (SD) and isolated spinal epidural empyema (ISEE) [4,5,6,7]. The incidence of PSI was previously reported to be 0.2–3 cases per 100.000 persons per year [8,9,10], however current age-standardized incidence rate in Germany was estimated to be 30 per 250.000 persons per year based on data from the Federal Statistical Office (2015) [11].

Despite diagnostic and therapeutic improvements, PSI remains a challenging disease with a high mortality rate [12]. Microbiological analysis of the causative bacteria plays a key role in the diagnostic and treatment of PSI [13], thus effective antibiotic treatment depends on the correct identification of the underlying bacterial species and their antimicrobial susceptibility.

To verify an infection, at least two peripheral blood cultures and several biopsies should be submitted for microbiological diagnostics [14]. Bacterial detection rate in PSI is successful in 50–83% of cases [15, 16]. In previous studies, methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) was the most detected bacterium in PSI, followed by coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CoNS) [12, 17,18,19,20,21].

A better understanding of the clinico-microbiological differences between the various bacterial species would improve the treatment and outcome, thus affecting the complication rate and length of stay in the hospital and intensive care unit (ICU). We analyzed the bacterial spectrum in our cohort of 187 surgical patients and assessed its impact on clinical disease course to determine a reproducible phenotyping of a bacterial population in SD and ISEE.

Methods

Study design and patient data

We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive spontaneous PSI cases from 2002 to 2022 treated surgically at our Neurosurgery University Spine Center in Dresden, Germany. All patients with proven PSI who underwent surgical treatment were included. We excluded five cases with non-pyogenic pathogens, sixteen cases without any evidence of pathogens, eight patients with only conservative treatment, and twelve patients with intradural infection. A total of 187 patients were included in the analysis (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study design: One hundred eighty-seven patients with proven pyogenic spondylodiscitis (SD: 125) and isolated spinal epidural empyema (ISEE: 62) were included in this study. Forty-one patients were excluded based on exclusion criteria

Full size image

The study was approved by the local ethics committee of the Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital in Dresden (Ref: BO-EK-17,012,022). Patients’ data were collected via the ORBIS system (ORBIS, Dedalus, Bonn, Germany) and neuroimaging studies through the IMPAX system (IMPAX, Impax Asset Management Group plc, London, UK).

Electronic medical records were first pseudonymized and then analyzed for various laboratory, microbiologic, histopathologic, clinical, and radiologic parameters. Relapse was defined as clinical, microbiological, and/or radiological progression during or after treatment up to the final follow-up of one year. We evaluated relapse rate, disease-related mortality, complication rate (sepsis [Soong, 2012 #49], septic embolism [Stawicki, 2013 #50], infective endocarditis [Barnett, 2016 #51]), and therapeutic modalities. Moreover, the detection rate of bacteria in blood culture, intraoperative specimen, and computed tomography (CT)-guided biopsy of psoas abscess was evaluated. To determine the source of infection in SD or ISEE, it is first necessary to understand the pathogenesis of spinal infections, which can begin in three different ways: direct contamination after surgery, adjacent spread from a neighboring soft tissue infection, or hematogenous spread from a distant source of infection such as pneumonia. If the spinal infection clearly emerged from one of these three routes and had the same pathogen, we called it the source of infection.

Clinico-microbiological management

Diagnosis and treatment

SD and ISEE were diagnosed on the basis of clinical, laboratory, microbiological, and radiological findings (magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and CT) according to the guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) [14]. Clinical and laboratory parameters included back or neck pain, fever, leukocyte count, C-reactive protein (CrP), and Procalcitonin.

Depending on the clinical condition, at least two blood cultures were taken for microbiological diagnosis before antibiotic therapy was initiated, while some patients were initially treated with antibiotics in a peripheral hospital due to their severe clinical condition. In addition, tissue samples taken during open surgery and samples obtained by CT-guided biopsies were also used for microbiological analysis. We treated all patients surgically in different procedures depending on the location of the infection, clinical and laboratory findings, and severity of the bone defects.

Patients with hemodynamic instability, sepsis, septic shock, or progressive neurological symptoms underwent empiric antibiotic therapy (EAT) immediately after collection of blood cultures. On the other hand, patients with stable hemodynamic and neurological symptoms received targeted antibiotic therapy (TAT) after pathogen detection in the blood culture, image-guided biopsy, or open surgery. In the case of culture-negative spondylodiscitis (blood culture, image-guided biopsy, and surgery), we initiated an EAT. EAT was based on the suspected pathogen, suspected source of infection, clinical condition, epidemiologic risk, and local historical in vitro susceptibility data. In most cases, our therapy was a combination of vancomycin with ceftriaxone or vancomycin with piperacillin/tazobactam.

The first-line therapy in our clinic for MSSA was flucloxacillin (1. 5 − 2 g intravenously (IV) every (e) 4–6 h), β-haemolytic Streptococci or penicillin-susceptible Enterococci penicillin G (20–24 million units IV e 24 h), Enterobacteriaceae or Pseudomonas aeruginosa cefepime (2 g IV e 8–12 h), MRSA, CoNS, or penicillin-resistant Enterococci vancomycin (IV 15–20 mg/kg e 12 h with loading dose and monitoring of serum levels).

In patients with foreign body infections or osteosynthesis material (fixator as therapy), a combination such as flucloxacillin or vancomycin with rifampicin was used. Depending on the clinical condition, infection parameters and MRI findings, the IV-therapy was switched to an oral therapy for another 4 weeks.

Microbiological assessment

Blood culture

Both the aerobic and anaerobic blood culture flasks (BACTEC Plus Aerobic/F and Anerobic/F) were incubated for a maximum of 14 days in the BACTECTM FX blood culture machine (BD, Heidelberg, Germany). After cultural growth was indicated, a Gram staining was performed. Furthermore, an agar diffusion test was carried out using a Müller-Hinton agar (bioMérieux, Nürtingen, Germany) and test platelets (bestbion dx, Köln, Germany) for specific antibiotics to provide a provisional resistogram. Cultivation from aerobic culture was performed by plating sample on a Columbia blood agar (bioMérieux, Nürtingen, Germany), on chocolate agar (bioMérieux, Nürtingen, Germany), bile Chryosidine Glycerol Agar (Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany), Sabauroud glucose agar (Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany) and on Columbia CNA agar with 5% sheep blood (Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany). HCG agar (Sifin Diagnostics GmbH, Berlin, Germany) was used to detect anaerobic bacterial. It was incubated in a culture pot “AnaeroJar” (Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany) under absorption of oxygen using AnaeroGen (Oxoid, Wesel, Germany). The aerobic cultures were incubated at 37 degrees for 24 h. The HCG agar was incubated for 48 h. As soon as bacterial colonies were detectable, the species were identified using MALDI TOF MS (Bruker Daltonics GmbH, Bremen, Germany).

Tissue from CT-guided or intraoperative sampling

Tissue obtained intraoperatively or CT-guided was placed directly in the operating theatre in Schaedler boullions (bioMérieux, Nürtingen, Germany) and these were subsequently sent to the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Virology, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital in Dresden for analysis. There, the boullions were first incubated at 37 degrees and examined for turbidity after 48 h. Once turbidity was detected, the culture suspension was plated on Columbia Blood Agar (bioMérieux, Nürtingen, Germany) and HCB Agar (bioMérieux, Nürtingen, Germany). Aerobic culture growth was checked for the first time after 24 h and anaerobic culture growth after another 48 h.

Antimicrobial susceptibility

The final antimicrobial susceptibility testing for aerobic bacterial species was performed using the VITEK 2 system (bioMérieux, Nürtingen, Germany) and the respective antimicrobial susceptibility test (AST) cards (bioMérieux, Nürtingen, Germany). The analysis was performed according to the guidelines of the manufacturer. Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of anaerobic bacteria were generated using the ATB ANA System (bioMérieux, Nürtingen, Germany) or Gradient diffusion tests (bestbion, Cologne, Germany).

Bacterial species that are known to be of definite human pathogenic relevance have been included in the evaluation if they occur in already one sample. In contrast, low-pathogenic species (e.g., facultative pathogens) were only included in the evaluation if they were detected in at least two independent clinical samples. The results of the resistograms were then compared to assess whether two isolates were of the same origin or not.

Formation of groups

The detected bacteria were grouped in gram-positive bacteria (GPB) and gram-negative bacteria (GNB) and further subgrouped according to the taxonomic classification, specific resistance phenotypes or characteristic properties (MSSA, Streptococcus spp. and Enterococcus spp. (SE), CoNS, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), bacillus spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacterales (E), and anaerobic bacteria). Furthermore, Enterococcus spp. and infections showing a polymicrobial spectrum were analyzed separately.

Statistical analysis

Data were statistically analysed with the SPSS software package (SPSS Statistics 28, IBM, Armonk, New York, USA). Descriptive statistics were used, and categorical variables were adjusted by Fisher exact tests or chi-square tests. Numerical variables were analysed with Mann-Whitney U tests. All statistical tests were two-sided, and a p value p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Demographics and baseline characteristics

We included 187 patients (males: 120, 64.2% vs. females: 67, 35.8%, p < 0.001) aged 68 [23–90] y, median [interquartile range] with SD (125, 66.8%) and ISEE (62, 33.2%), of whom 162 (86.6%) had GPB and 25 (13.4%) had GNB (Table 1).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics
Full size table

Multiple blood cultures and intraoperative samples were taken from all patients, whereas 65 tappable patients (56.0%) out of 116 patients with psoas abscess (62%) underwent CT-guided biopsy. EAT was initially performed in 122 patients (65.2%) and later changed to TAT as soon as the underlying bacterial species was known, while 65 patients (34.8%) were treated directly with a TAT. Patients without antibiotic therapy or with an antibiotic-free period of more than 2 days formed the TAT group, whereas patients with ongoing antibiotic therapy or an antibiotic-free period of less than 2 days formed the EAT group. Patients received intravenous antibiotics for approximately 4 weeks (4 [3,4,5,6] w) and a total of 8 weeks antibiotics (8 [6,7,8,9,10,11,12] w). Sepsis was observed in 94 patients (50.3%), septic embolism in 50 patients (33.3%), and infective endocarditis with vegetation in echocardiography in 23 patients (14.3%). Twenty-eight patients (22.8%) relapsed, and ten patients (5.3%) died from the diseases and their complications (Table 1). To exclude septic embolism, 150 patients (80.2%) underwent radiological examination, 161 patients (86.1%) underwent TTE and TEE, and 123 patients (65.8%) underwent one-year clinical, laboratory, and radiological follow-up to exclude a relapse.

Identified bacteria

MSSA were the most commonly identified bacteria (100, 53.5%), followed by S. epidermidis (18, 9.6%) and Escherichia coli (8, 4.3%). MRSA, Streptococcus anginosus, Streptococcus dysgalactiae, Streptococcus gallolyticus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Proteus mirabilis were each identified in 5 cases (2.7%). P. aeruginosa, Cutibacterium acnes, Enterococcus faecalis, and Streptococcus mitis/gordonii were each observed in 4 cases (2.1%). Klebsiella pneumoniae and Streptococcus agalactiae were each isolated in 3 cases (1.6%). Salmonella spp. were found in 2 cases (1.1%). Prevotella bivia, Morganella morganii, Klebsiella oxytoca, Parvimonas micra, Bacillus pumilus, Staphylococcus capitis, and Staphylococcus hominis were each detected in 1 case (0.5%) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Identified bacteria in spondylodiscitis and isolated spinal epidural empyema: This figure shows the detected bacteria in patients with spondylodiscitis (SD) and isolated spinal epidural empyema (ISEE). MSSA: Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus, MRSA: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Full size image

Gram spectrum of bacteria

Bacterial spectrum was mainly dominated by GPB (GPB: 162, 86.6% vs. GNB: 25, 13.4%, p < 0.001). GPB were observed in 105 SD patients (64.8%) and in 57 ISEE patients (35.2%), while GNB were noted in 20 SD patients (80.0%) and 5 ISEE patients (20%) (p = 0.172). Endocarditis with vegetation in echocardiography occurred solely in GPB (GPB: 23, 16.5% vs. GNB: 0, 0.0%, p = 0.046). GNB showed a different distribution of primary infectious sources compared to GPB, especially more urinary tract infections (GPB: 4, 3.7% vs. GNB: 9, 40.9%, p < 0.001) (Table 2).

Table 2 Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria in spinal infections
Full size table

Subgroups

Based on detailed review of the detected bacteria, we subgrouped the bacterial species according to the taxonomic classification, specific resistance phenotypes or characteristic properties. GPB excluding anaerobic bacteria (n = 157, 84.0%) were divided into MSSA (n = 100, 53.5%), SE (n = 31, 16.6%), CoNS (n = 20, 10.7%), MRSA (n = 5, 2.7%) and Bacillus spp. (n = 1, 0.5%), while GNB without anaerobic bacteria (n = 24, 12.8%) were grouped into E (n = 20, 10.7%) and P. aeruginosa (n = 4, 2.1%). Anaerobic bacteria (n = 6, 3.2%) included gram-positive C. acnes (n = 4, 2.1%) and P. micra (n = 1, 0.5%) and gram-negative Prevotella bivia (n = 1, 0.5%).

We analyzed and compared all subgroups with more than 20 cases, while small subgroups were evaluated separately (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Bacterial subgroups in spondylodiscitis and isolated spinal epidural empyema: This figure demonstrates the subgroups of detected bacteria detected in our cohort. GPB: Gram-positive bacteria, GNB: Gram-negative bacteria. MSSA: Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus, MRSA: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, St.: Staphylococcus, S.: Streptococcus, E.: Escherichia, K.: Klebsiella, M.: Morganella, C.: Cutibacterium

Full size image

Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA)

MSSA were found less in SD and more in ISEE (SD: 57, 57.0% vs. ISEE: 43, 43.0%) compared to other bacteria (OB) (SD: 68, 78.2% vs. ISEE: 19, 21.8%, p = 0.003).

MSSA was found more in the cervical spine (CS) compared to other bacteria (OB) (MSSA: 41, 41.0% vs. OB:18, 20.7%, p = 0.004), but no differences were observed in samples from the thoracic spine (TS) (MSSA: 45, 45.0% vs. OB: 30, 34.5%, p = 0.178), and samples derived from the lumbar spine (LS) (MSSA: 64, 64.0% vs. OB: 59, 67.8%, p = 0.644).

The sources of infection in MSSA differed in distribution from OB (p < 0.001), particularly in relation to skin infections (MSSA: 26, 41.3% vs. OB: 11, 16.7%) and foreign body-associated infections (MSSA: 5, 7.9% vs. OB: 18, 27.3%) (Table 3).

Table 3 Clinical characteristics of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus
Full size table

Streptococcus spp. and Enterococcus spp. (SE)

Streptococcus spp. and Enterococcus spp. were found more often in SD but less frequently in ISEE (SD: 26, 83.9% vs. ISEE: 5, 6.1%) compared to OB (SD: 99, 63.5% vs. ISEE: 57, 36.5%, p = 0.036).

Endocarditis was found more frequently in the “SE subgroup” than in the “OB subgroup” (SE: 8, 27.6% vs. OB: 15, 11.4%, p = 0.037).

The diagnostic sensitivity for the “SE subgroup” was in intraoperative specimens lower compared to OB (SE: 19, 61.3% vs. OB: 138, 88.5%, p < 0.001), however no differences were observed in blood cultures (SE: 23, 74.2% vs. OB: 95, 60.9%, p = 0.221), and CT-guided biopsies (SE: 7/11, 63.6% vs. OB: 30/54, 55.6%, p = 0.745) (Table 4).

Table 4 Clinical characteristics of Streptococcus spp. und Enterococcus spp
Full size table

Enterobacterales (E)

The sources of infection in Enterobacterales differed in distribution from OB (p < 0.001), particularly in relation to urinary tract infections (E: 9, 50.0% vs. OB: 4, 3.6%) (Table 5).

Table 5 Clinical characteristics of Enterobacterales
Full size table

Coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CoNS)

Sepsis (CoNS: 4, 20.0% vs. OB: 90, 53.9%, p = 0.004), and length of ICU stay (CoNS: 2 [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18] d vs. OB: 6 [1–53] d, p = 0.037) were less frequent in CoNS than in OB. However, no differences were found in septic embolism (CoNS: 3, 20.0% vs. OB: 47, 34.8%, p = 0.387), endocarditis (CoNS: 2, 12.5% vs. OB: 21, 14.5%, p = 1.0), relapse rate (CoNS: 3, 18.8% vs. OB: 25, 23.4%, p = 1.0), disease-related mortality (CoNS: 0, 0.0% vs. OB: 10, 6.0%, p = 0.604), and length of hospital stay (CoNS: 34 [17–135] d vs. OB: 32 [9–165] d, p = 0.381).

The diagnostic sensitivity for detecting CoNS was in intraoperative specimens higher compared to OB (CoNS: 20, 100.0% vs. OB: 137, 82.0%, p = 0.048). However, no differences were observed in blood cultures (CoNS: 9, 45.0% vs. OB: 109, 65.3%, p = 0.089), and CT-guided biopsies (CoNS: 2/3, 66.7% vs. OB: 35/62, 56.5%, p = 1.0).

The sources of infection in CoNS differed in distribution from OB (p = 0.005), particularly in relation to skin infections (CoNS: 1, 7.7% vs. OB: 36, 31.0%) and foreign body-associated infections (CoNS: 8, 61.5% vs. OB: 15, 12.9%) (Table 6).

Table 6 Clinical characteristics of Coagulase-negative Staphylococci
Full size table

Anaerobic bacteria

Anaerobic bacteria were equally detected in SD and ISEE patients (SD: 3, ISEE: 3). Women were more frequently affected than men (women: 5, men: 1) and the median age was 80 [78–82] years. Two patients had septic embolism, and sepsis, but none had endocarditis or died, whereas one patient suffered a relapse. Patients spent 24.5 [13.5–34] days in the hospital and 1.5 [1–7.5] days on the ICU. All bacteria were identified only by intraoperative specimens. Three bacteria were found in the CS, one in the TS, and 2 in the LS. Retropharyngeal, and odontogenic infections were the primary of infections.

MRSA

The “MRSA subgroup” of 2 male and 3 female patients aged 81 [80–83] years was observed in 4 SD patients and one patient with ISEE. Sepsis was observed in 3 patients and endocarditis in 2 patients, but septic emboli did not occur. We found two relapses, but no in this subgroup. Prolonged hospital stay of 56 [24–58] days and ICU stay of 16 [1–44] days were recorded. In blood cultures and intraoperative specimens, four bacteria were detected, while two were detected in CT-guided biopsies. MRSA was diagnosed twice in the CS, once in the TS, and two times in the LS. Respiratory, gastrointestinal, and skin infections were the primary sources.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

In three men and one woman aged 72 [71–75] years, P. aeruginosa caused three SD and one ISEE. Two patients had sepsis and one endocarditis, while no patient had a relapse or died. Patients spent 20 [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29] days in the hospital and no day in the ICU 0 [0–5]. All bacteria were identified in intraoperative specimens and 2 of them in blood culture. Two patients underwent CT-guided biopsy of the psoas muscles, which was successful in one of them. Three bacteria were found in the TS and one in the CS, whereas LS was not affected. Respiratory and retropharyngeal infections were the source of the infections.

Polymicrobial Infections

In our cohort polymicrobial infections caused only spondylodiscitis and were documented in 8 patients. Candida albicans accounted for half of the polymicrobial infections and it was always associated with S. aureus (2 MSSA, 2 MRSA). B. fragilis was founded in infections with P. aeruginosa. C. acnes was present as a co-infection in MSSA infection. S. epidermidis was detected in a S. anginosus infection.

Therapy was adjusted according to the antibiogram. One patient died during treatment, and relapse was observed in 3 patients. The source of infection was pneumonia in two patients, gastrointestinal infection in 3 cases, per continuitatem spread of infection in two cases, and infection due to foreign body in one patient.

Discussion

Our study provides insights into the bacterial spectrum and related clinical courses in SD and ISEE and identifies several bacterial group-related profiles. GPB were more frequently detected than GNB and exclusively caused infective endocarditis in our study. Previous studies showed that GPB was more common than GNB in ISEE and SD [8].

MSSA was the most common bacterium in SD and ISEE in our cohort, representing more than half of cases, which is consistent with the literature [12, 17,18,19,20,21,22]. In our study, MSSA occurred more frequently in ISEE than in SD, which was also observed by Stangenberg et al. [12]. MSSA occurred more frequently in CS than OB in our cohort, which previous studies have confirmed [12, 23,24,25]. Skin infections and epidural administrations such as infiltration therapies were the most source of infection in the “MSSA subgroup”. This is in line with studies showing that MSSA was common source of skin infections with spinal involvement [26,27,28].

The “SE subgroup” were the second most frequent bacterial subgroup in our study, causing 16.6% of infections, as reported in most studies [11, 29,30,31]. Nonetheless, some authors observed S. epidermidis being the second common causative bacteria [12, 22]. Endocarditis was more frequently found in the “SE subgroup”, in accordance with previous studies [11, 29]. Streptococcus spp. and Enterococcus spp. were detected more frequently in SD and less in ISEE, which has not been reported in literature yet. In accordance with the European diagnostic guidelines, we recommend first collecting blood cultures and then image-guided biopsy or open surgery, whereby the diagnostic sensitivity of intraoperative specimens in our study was lower in the “SE subgroup” (61.3%) and higher in the “CoNS subgroup” (100.0%) [Lazzeri, 2019 #48]. Other methods such as blood culture and CT-guided biopsy of psoas abscess showed no difference between the pathogen groups.

Infections with CoNS have increased recently due to the potential ability to biofilm formation and colonization in various surfaces, as well as the increasing use of medical implants [32]. One possible other cause would be the increasing sonication examination of foreign bodies. CoNS was associated with a shorter ICU stay and less sepsis and could always be isolated by intraoperative specimens, which was due to the detection of infected foreign bodies. In line with other studies, the source of infection in CoNS in our collective was frequently a foreign body-associated infection such as port infection [11, 33,34,35]. S. epidermidis is the second most common single bacteria after MSSA in our cohort (n = 18, 9.6%) and forms the fourth largest subgroup of SD and ISEE. Th previous studies reported similar results with a few exceptions [12, 22, 35, 36].

Enterobacterales were the main representatives of GNB and caused 10.7% of SD and ISEE in our collective. The literature data on the frequency of this subgroup in SD and ISEE varies widely [12, 22, 35]. Endocarditis was associated less frequently with Enterobacterales, in accordance with the literature data showing that endocarditis occurs in more than 80% of patients with GPB [11, 23]. Consistent with reported literature, the main source of infection in this subgroup was urinary tract infections [11, 35].

The “Anaerobic subgroup” could only be detected in intraoperative specimens, which showed the importance of this procedure. MRSA increased hospital length of stay to 56 days and ICU length of stay to 16 days, demonstrating the complexity of managing this infection, whereas patients with P. aeruginosa spent only 20 days in the hospital and no day in the ICU. Polymicrobial infections showed a complicated course and were half associated with C. albicans, which has not been previously investigated.

Limitation and strengths of this study

Our study is limited by its retrospective design and a possible selection bias toward the more severe cases due to the high degree of specialization at our university center. Nevertheless, our data derived from detailed clinical, imaging, and microbiological state-of-the-art diagnostic assessment with high internal validity and a meaningful sample size Lastly, the generalizability of our observations is limited by the monocentric design of our study. The study spanned 20 years, and the number of patients per year is not large enough to make a conclusion about the distribution and transformation of the pathogens over a period of time.

Conclusions

Our study shows that the bacterial groups in SD and ISEE have distinct bacterial-related patterns, which may help modify guidelines towards more tailored management.

GPB dominated the bacterial spectrum of SD and ISEE and were solely responsible for endocarditis. The most frequently isolated strain was MSSA, which was found more often in patients with skin infections and in the CS compared to other bacteria. Streptococci and enterococci were more frequently isolated in intraoperative specimens, were more frequently considered the cause of endocarditis, and were more often found in SD than in ISEE. CoNS resulted in less sepsis, shorter ICU stay, and was frequently associated with foreign body infection. Enterobacterales were the main representatives of GNB that did not cause endocarditis and were associated with urinary tract infections. Anaerobic bacteria could only be detected in intraoperative specimens in our study. In addition, MRSA increased hospital and ICU length of stay.

Data availability

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article.

Abbreviations

PSI:

Primary spinal infections

SD:

Spondylodiscitis

ISEE:

Isolated spinal epidural empyema

MSSA:

Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus

CoNS:

Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci

CT:

Computed tomography

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

GPB:

Gram-Positive bacteria

GNB:

Gram-Negative bacteria

SE:

Streptococcus spp. and Enterococcus spp

MRSA:

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

E:

Enterobacterales

TTE:

Transthoracic echocardiogram

TEE:

Transesophageal echocardiogram

TAT:

Empiric antibiotic therapy

EAT:

Targeted antibiotic therapy

CS:

Cervical spine

TS:

Thoracic spine

LS:

Lumbar spine

ICU:

Intensive care unit

spp.:

Species

References

  1. Jevtic V. Vertebral Infection. Eur Radiol. 2004;14(Suppl 3):E43–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Khan IA, Vaccaro AR, Zlotolow DA. Management of vertebral diskitis and osteomyelitis. Orthopedics. 1999;22(8):758–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tali ET. Spinal Infections. Eur J Radiol. 2004;50(2):120–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Alerhand S, Wood S, Long B, Koyfman A. The time-sensitive challenge of diagnosing spinal epidural abscess in the emergency department. Intern Emerg Med. 2017;12(8):1179–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Babic M, Simpfendorfer CS. Infections of the spine. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2017;31(2):279–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Davis DP, Wold RM, Patel RJ, Tran AJ, Tokhi RN, Chan TC, Vilke GM. The clinical presentation and impact of diagnostic delays on emergency department patients with spinal epidural abscess. J Emerg Med. 2004;26(3):285–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shroyer SR, Davis WT, April MD, Long B, Boys G, Mehta SG, Mercaldo SF. A clinical Prediction Tool for MRI in Emergency Department patients with spinal Infection. West J Emerg Med. 2021;22(5):1156–66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Grammatico L, Baron S, Rusch E, Lepage B, Surer N, Desenclos JC, Besnier JM. Epidemiology of vertebral osteomyelitis (VO) in France: analysis of hospital-discharge data 2002–2003. Epidemiol Infect. 2008;136(5):653–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Krogsgaard MR, Wagn P, Bengtsson J. Epidemiology of acute vertebral osteomyelitis in Denmark: 137 cases in Denmark 1978–1982, compared to cases reported to the National Patient Register 1991–1993. Acta Orthop Scand. 1998;69(5):513–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sapico FL, Montgomerie JZ. Pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis: report of nine cases and review of the literature. Rev Infect Dis. 1979;1(5):754–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Herren C, Jung N, Pishnamaz M, Breuninger M, Siewe J, Sobottke R. Spondylodiscitis: diagnosis and treatment options. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017;114(51–52):875–82.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Stangenberg M, Mende KC, Mohme M, Kratzig T, Viezens L, Both A, Rohde H, Dreimann M. Influence of microbiological diagnosis on the clinical course of spondylodiscitis. Infection. 2021;49(5):1017–27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Gouliouris T, Aliyu SH, Brown NM. Spondylodiscitis: update on diagnosis and management. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65(Suppl 3):iii11–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Berbari EF, Kanj SS, Kowalski TJ, Darouiche RO, Widmer AF, Schmitt SK, Hendershot EF, Holtom PD, Huddleston PM 3rd, Petermann GW, et al. Executive Summary: 2015 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) Clinical Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of native vertebral osteomyelitis in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61(6):859–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pola E, Taccari F, Autore G, Giovannenze F, Pambianco V, Cauda R, Maccauro G, Fantoni M. Multidisciplinary management of pyogenic spondylodiscitis: epidemiological and clinical features, prognostic factors and long-term outcomes in 207 patients. Eur Spine J. 2018;27(Suppl 2):229–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sobottke R, Seifert H, Fatkenheuer G, Schmidt M, Gossmann A, Eysel P. Current diagnosis and treatment of spondylodiscitis. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2008;105(10):181–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Appalanaidu N, Shafafy R, Gee C, Brogan K, Karmani S, Morassi G, Elsayed S. Predicting the need for surgical intervention in patients with spondylodiscitis: the Brighton Spondylodiscitis score (BSDS). Eur Spine J. 2019;28(4):751–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gentile L, Benazzo F, De Rosa F, Boriani S, Dallagiacoma G, Franceschetti G, Gaeta M, Cuzzocrea F. A systematic review: characteristics, Complications and treatment of spondylodiscitis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019;23(2 Suppl):117–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Loibl M, Stoyanov L, Doenitz C, Brawanski A, Wiggermann P, Krutsch W, Nerlich M, Oszwald M, Neumann C, Salzberger B, et al. Outcome-related co-factors in 105 cases of vertebral osteomyelitis in a tertiary care hospital. Infection. 2014;42(3):503–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pola E, Autore G, Formica VM, Pambianco V, Colangelo D, Cauda R, Fantoni M. New classification for the treatment of pyogenic spondylodiscitis: validation study on a population of 250 patients with a follow-up of 2 years. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(Suppl 4):479–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Valancius K, Hansen ES, Hoy K, Helmig P, Niedermann B, Bunger C. Failure modes in Conservative and surgical management of infectious spondylodiscitis. Eur Spine J. 2013;22(8):1837–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Adogwa O, Karikari IO, Carr KR, Krucoff M, Ajay D, Fatemi P, Perez EL, Cheng JS, Bagley CA, Isaacs RE. Spontaneous spinal epidural abscess in patients 50 years of age and older: a 15-year institutional perspective and review of the literature: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;20(3):344–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Donovan J, Skittrall JP, Moore T, Sargent C, Agranoff D, Llewelyn M. An ageing population and changing UK bacteraemia profile may affect the characteristics and microbiology of infective spondylodiscitis. J Infect. 2016;73(1):91–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ghobrial GM, Franco D, Theofanis T, Margiotta PJ, Andrews E, Wilson JR, Harrop JS, Heller JE. Cervical spondylodiscitis: presentation, timing, and Surgical Management in 59 patients. World Neurosurg. 2017;103:664–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shousha M, Heyde C, Boehm H. Cervical spondylodiscitis: change in clinical picture and operative management during the last two decades. A series of 50 patients and review of literature. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(3):571–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cheung GYC, Bae JS, Otto M. Pathogenicity and virulence of Staphylococcus aureus. Virulence. 2021;12(1):547–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Klevens RM, Morrison MA, Nadle J, Petit S, Gershman K, Ray S, Harrison LH, Lynfield R, Dumyati G, Townes JM, et al. Invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections in the United States. JAMA. 2007;298(15):1763–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rasigade JP, Dumitrescu O, Lina G. New epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus Infections. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20(7):587–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Courjon J, Lemaignen A, Ghout I, Therby A, Belmatoug N, Dinh A, Gras G, Bernard L. Group DTSs: pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis of the elderly: characteristics and outcomes. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(12):e0188470.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Nolla JM, Ariza J, Gomez-Vaquero C, Fiter J, Bermejo J, Valverde J, Escofet DR, Gudiol F. Spontaneous pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis in nondrug users. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2002;31(4):271–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pigrau C, Almirante B, Flores X, Falco V, Rodriguez D, Gasser I, Villanueva C, Pahissa A. Spontaneous pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis and endocarditis: incidence, risk factors, and outcome. Am J Med. 2005;118(11):1287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Namvar AE, Bastarahang S, Abbasi N, Ghehi GS, Farhadbakhtiarian S, Arezi P, Hosseini M, Baravati SZ, Jokar Z, Chermahin SG. Clinical characteristics of Staphylococcus epidermidis: a systematic review. GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2014;9(3):Doc23.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Jimenez-Mejias ME, de Dios Colmenero J, Sanchez-Lora FJ, Palomino-Nicas J, Reguera JM, de la Garcia J, Garcia-Ordonez MA, Pachon J. Postoperative spondylodiskitis: etiology, clinical findings, prognosis, and comparison with nonoperative pyogenic spondylodiskitis. Clin Infect Dis. 1999;29(2):339–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Legrand E, Flipo RM, Guggenbuhl P, Masson C, Maillefert JF, Soubrier M, Noel E, Saraux A, Di Fazano CS, Sibilia J, et al. Management of nontuberculous infectious discitis. Treatments used in 110 patients admitted to 12 teaching hospitals in France. Joint Bone Spine. 2001;68(6):504–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Saeed K, Esposito S, Ascione T, Bassetti M, Bonnet E, Carnelutti A, Chan M, Lye DC, Cortes N, Dryden M, et al. Hot topics on vertebral osteomyelitis from the International Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2019;54(2):125–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bernard L, Dinh A, Ghout I, Simo D, Zeller V, Issartel B, Le Moing V, Belmatoug N, Lesprit P, Bru JP, et al. Antibiotic treatment for 6 weeks versus 12 weeks in patients with pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9971):875–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Spine Surgery, Technische Universität Dresden, Faculty of Medicine, and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany

    Mido Max Hijazi, Dino Podlesek, Gabriele Schackert, Tareq A Juratli, Ilker Y Eyüpoglu & Andreas Filis

  2. Department of Neurology, Technische Universität Dresden, Faculty of Medicine, and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany

    Timo Siepmann

  3. Department of Cardiology, Bergmannsheil University Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bürkle de la Camp-Platz 1, 44789, Bochum, Germany

    Ibrahim El-Battrawy

  4. Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Technische Universität Dresden, Faculty of Medicine, and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany

    Percy Schröttner

  5. Institute for Microbiology and Virology, Technische Universität Dresden, Faculty of Medicine, and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany

    Percy Schröttner

Authors
  1. Mido Max Hijazi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Timo Siepmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ibrahim El-Battrawy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Percy Schröttner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Dino Podlesek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Gabriele Schackert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Tareq A Juratli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ilker Y Eyüpoglu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Andreas Filis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.M.H.: conceptualization, methodology, software, validation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, writing original draft preparation, project administration, and funding acquisition. A.F., G.S., I.E., T.J., D.P., E.I, P.S., T.S., M.H.H.: writing review and editing, visualization, and supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mido Max Hijazi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the local ethics committee at the University Hospital Dresden (protocol code: BO-EK-17012022, January 2022). Patient informed consent was waived by the local ethics committee at the University Hospital Dresden due to the retrospective, anonymous character of this study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hijazi, M.M., Siepmann, T., El-Battrawy, I. et al. The importance of the bacterial spectrum in the clinical diagnostics and management of patients with spontaneous pyogenic spondylodiscitis and isolated spinal epidural empyema: a 20-year cohort study at a single spine center. BMC Infect Dis 24, 39 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08946-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08946-x

Keywords

BMC Infectious Diseases

ISSN: 1471-2334

Contact us