Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Persistence of cervical high-risk human papillomavirus in women living with HIV in Denmark – the SHADE

BMC Infectious Diseases volume 19, Article number: 740 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Women living with HIV (WLWH) have high rates of persistent high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) infections and cervical cancer. We aimed to assess the distribution of hrHPV genotypes, risk factors of type-specific hrHPV persistence, and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or worse (≥HSIL) in WLWH in Denmark.

Methods

From the prospective Study on HIV, cervical Abnormalities and infections in women in Denmark (SHADE) we identified WLWH with a positive hrHPV test during the study period; 2011–2014. HIV demographics were retrieved from the Danish HIV Cohort Study and pathology results from the The Danish Pathology Data Bank. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors associated with persistent hrHPV infection (positivity of the same hrHPV type in two samples one-two years after the first hrHPV positive date) and ≥ HSIL.

Results

Of 71 WLWH, 31 (43.7%) had persistent hrHPV infection. Predominant hrHPV genotypes were HPV58, 52, 51, and 35 and most frequently observed persistent genotypes were HPV52, 33 and 31. CD4 < 350 cells/μL predicted genotype-specific hrHPV persistence (adjusted OR 4.36 (95%CI: 1.18–16.04)) and ≥ HSIL was predicted by prior AIDS (adjusted OR 8.55 (95% CI 1.21–60.28)).

Conclusions

This prospective cohort study of well-treated WLWH in Denmark found a high rate of persistent hrHPV infections with predominantly non-16/18 hrHPV genotypes. CD4 count < 350 cells/μL predicted hrHPV persistence, while prior AIDS predicted ≥HSIL.

Peer Review reports

Highlights

Persistent hrHPV infection with non-16/18 was highly prevalent in women living with HIV.

Multiple hrHPV infections was seen in a third of participating women living with HIV.

Low CD4 count predicted hrHPV persistence.

Cytological abnormalities were predicted by short duration of ART and prior AIDS.

Background

Persistent infection with high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) is a prerequisite for the development of cervical cancer (CC) [1]. Yet, the majority of acquired HPV infections are transient and naturally cleared by the immune system within a few months [1]. HrHPV genotypes differ in their carcinogenic potential and therefore genotype distribution has an impact on the risk of CC development [1,2,3,4,5].

Two modalities are available to prevent CC; primary prevention through vaccine, and secondary prevention through screening with cytology and hrHPV testing. As current vaccines do not cover all oncogenic HPV genotypes, nor eliminate existing infections at time of vaccination [6], screening remains an important preventive effort. In the general population, the impact of cervical screening on CC mortality is well described [7]. However, the inability of current screening technologies to distinguish between transient and persistent HPV infection is an important cause of overtreatment [8].

Women living with HIV (WLWH) have a higher prevalence of hrHPV, a higher rate of persistent hrHPV infection, and a higher rate of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and CC compared to HIV-negative women [1, 4, 9,10,11,12]. Moreover, the hrHPV genotype distribution differs between the two populations [13,14,15,16].

With the longevity gained from combined antiretroviral therapy (ART) [17, 18] the burden of HPV-related cancer is of increasing concern in people living with HIV (PLWH) [17]. Moreover, the impact of ART on hrHPV and cervical lesions are still debatable [9]. As primary prevention, European HIV guidelines recommend HPV vaccination of WLWH through age 26 [19]. As secondary prevention, HPV based screening is currently substituting cytology screening in many European countries. Yet, the high hrHPV prevalence amongst WLWH challenges HPV based screening as this results in lower specificity compared to cervical cytology screening [20]. The ideal way to adopt screening programs for WLWH is therefore still unresolved.

Data on hrHPV persistence in WLWH is scarce and heterogeneous, therefore the aim of this study was to assess the distribution of hrHPV genotypes, risk factors of type-specific hrHPV persistence, cervical cytological abnormalities and CIN in WLWH in Denmark.

Methods

Setting

In Denmark, the estimated HIV prevalence among adults is 0.1% [21]. Medical care, including ART, is tax-paid and provided free-of-charge [13]. HIV treatment is restricted to nine specialized medical centers with outpatient visits every 3–6 months [22]. Six of these centers participated in this prospective, observational cohort study of WLWH in Denmark [23] called Study on HIV, cervical Abnormalities and infections in women in Denmark (SHADE) [13, 23].

In the SHADE, WLWH were consecutively enrolled from 1 February 2011 to 1 February 2012 and followed-up after 6, 12 and 24 months. Inclusion criteria were HIV-1 infection and ≥ 18 years of age. At each visit all participants underwent a gynecological examination including an HPV test and a cervical cytology sample. In the present study, WLWH entered the analyses the day they were diagnosed hrHPV positive. If applicable, WLWH were censured at time of conization/hysterectomy. Exclusion criteria were pregnancy at first visit, prior hysterectomy, alcohol and/or drug abuse impeding adherence to the protocol. Information on tobacco use, age at sexual debut, lifetime sexual partners, prior condyloma, HPV vaccination status, and contraceptive use was obtained from a questionnaire (Additional file 1) [13, 23]. The EpiData Entry program was used for double manual data entry [24].

Registry data

Civil registration system (CRS)

The CRS is a national registry of all Danish residents [25]. A 10-digit personal identification number (PIN) is assigned to each individual at birth or immigration. This PIN was used to link data from the SHADE cohort, the Danish HIV Cohort Study (DHCS) and the The Danish Pathology Data Bank (DPDB).

Danish HIV cohort study (DHCS)

The DHCS is a prospective, observational, nationwide, multicenter cohort study of all PLWH seen at the Danish HIV centers since 1 January 1995 and has been described in detail elsewhere [22]. We retrieved HIV demographics from the DHCS.

The Danish pathology data Bank (DPDB)

The DPDB contains nationwide records of all pathology specimens analyzed in Denmark since 1997 [26]. Cytology and histology samples were retrieved using the Systemized Nomenclature of Medicine (SNOMED) code of cervix uteri and uterus: T8x2*, T8x3*, T82* and T83*.

Cytology and HPV testing

Cervical samples were collected using the combi brush (Rovers, Oss, The Netherlands) in SurePath liquid based cytology media (BD Diagnostics, Durham, NC, US) and analyzed at the Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre. The Bethesda 2001 system was used to report the cytology results [27]. Samples were classified as normal, atypical cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL), or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) (including atypical squamous cells - cannot exclude HSIL (ASC-H), atypical glandular cells and adenocarcinoma in situ), squamous cell-and adenocarcinoma. Histology reports of CIN grade 1 (CIN1), CIN grade 2 (CIN2), CIN grade 3 (CIN3) and CC were based on biopsies. Cytology and histology results were presented as the worst cytology/histology result diagnosed concurrent with or after a positive hrHPV test.

Cervical samples for HPV testing were collected using flocked swabs (UTM-RT viral transport media Flocked Polyester Swabs, Copan Diagnostics, Inc., Murrieta, CA). All samples were stored at room temperature and examined by the CLART HPV2 assay (Genomica, Madrid, Spain) at the Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre. PCR amplification of genotype specific HPV L1 fragments from 35 individual HPV genotypes was performed; of these 13 were hrHPV genotypes: HPV16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, and 68 [28].

Definition of type-specific persistence versus clearance

Type-specific persistence was defined as positivity of the same hrHPV type in two separate cervical samples having been taken at least 1 year and at most 2 years after the date the patient was first hrHPV positive. Clearance was defined as having one or more negative results after a hrHPV positive sample [29]. WLWH with type-specific persistence of one genotype and clearance of another were reported as having persistent HPV infection.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were summarized as median and interquartile ranges (IQR) and compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Categorical variables were reported as counts and percentages and compared using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, where appropriate. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were used to identify predictors of persistent hrHPV, ASCUS or worse (≥ASCUS), LSIL or worse (≥LSIL), and HSIL or worse (≥HSIL) expressed as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). We chose six candidate predictor variables a priori due to current knowledge on risk factors of HPV infection [13, 30, 31]; age (18–34 vs. ≥ 35 years), race (White, Asian, and Black), duration of ART (years on ART), AIDS prior to inclusion, smoking status (never smoker vs. current smoker/ex-smoker) and latest CD4 count when first hrHPV positive (< 350 and ≥ 350 cells/μL). Predictors of ≥ASCUS, ≥LSIL, and ≥ HSIL were estimated by including the aforementioned variables and additionally persistent hrHPV infection. Since duration of ART, prior AIDS and the CD4 count are dependent covariates, two models were used: 1) a model where all variables but the latest CD4 count was included and 2) a model where duration of ART and prior AIDS were replaced by latest CD4. From the second model only, the OR of the CD4 count was presented.

In all analyses p-values < 0.05 (two-tailed) were considered significant. For category variables with more than two outcome categories (df > 1), we controlled for repeated testing by estimating the combined p-value. We excluded individuals with missing explanatory values from the multiple regression analyses. The validity of the model was tested using the Hosmer and Lemeshow Goodness-of-Fit Test. SAS statistical software version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used for data analysis.

Results

Overall, 334 WLWH were included in the overall SHADE study, and of these, 252 (75.5%), 245 (73.4%) and 234 (70.1%), respectively, participated at the subsequent visits at 6, 12 and 24 months after inclusion (Fig. 1). During follow-up, 96 WLWH (28.7%) presented with at least one hrHPV-positive test through the course of three visits. Of these, 25 WLWH (26.0%) had an indeterminable course of HPV infection either if no follow-up tests were performed or censored at time of conization (none were hysterectomized). In total, 71 WLWH were included in this analysis (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart of inclusion, follow-up and course of hrHPV infection. WLWH = Women living with HIV. SHADE = Study on HIV, cervical Abnormalities and infections in women in Denmark. hrHPV = High-risk human papillomavirus

Full size image

Of the 71 included WLWH, 31 (43.7%) had persistent hrHPV infection (Fig. 1). Table 1 shows baseline characteristics of WLWH with persistent and cleared hrHPV infection. Median age was 42.5 (IQR 33.8–49.5) years. The majority of WLWH (96.7 and 83.8%) were sexually infected with HIV and were on ART with HIV-RNA < 40 copies/mL (80.8 and 72.7%). More WLWH in the hrHPV persistence group had a CD4 count< 350 cells/μL (40.7% vs. 15.2%, p = 0.03) (Table 1).

Table 1 Characteristics of study participants with persistenta and clearedb high-risk (hr) human papillomavirus (HPV) infection during the study period 2011–2014 (n = 71)
Full size table

Multiple (≥2) hrHPV infections were present in 23 of 71 women at inclusion (32.4%). Predominant hrHPV genotypes were HPV58 (n = 20; 28.1%), 52 (n = 14; 19.7%), 51 (n = 13; 18.3%) and 35 (n = 13; 18.3%). HrHPV genotypes most likely to persist were HPV52, 33 and 31 (78.6, 42.9, and 40.0%) (Table 2). One woman was vaccinated against HPV (name of vaccine unknown) (Table 1) and had persistent HPV35.

Table 2 Distribution of persistenta and clearedb high-risk (hr) human papillomavirus (HPV) infections in 71 included WLWH
Full size table

Predictor of HPV persistence was CD4 < 350 cells/μL (adjusted OR 4.36 (95%CI: 1.18–16.04), Table 3). Predictor of concurrent cytology findings of ≥ASCUS and ≥ LSIL was short duration of ART (≥ASCUS: adjusted OR 0.85 (95%CI: 0.74–0.99), Table 4 and Additional file 2, ≥LSIL: adjusted OR 0.83 (95%CI: 0.71–0.97), Table 4 and Additional file 3). Despite low numbers, ≥HSIL was predicted by prior AIDS (adjusted OR 8.55 (95%CI 1.21–60.28), Table 4 and Additional file 4). Due to a limited number of events predictors of CIN were not estimated. There was no significant difference between the HPV persistence and the HPV clearance group and their cytological and histological outcomes.

Table 3 Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios for predictors of persistent high-risk (hr) human papillomavirus (HPV) infection (n = 71)
Full size table
Table 4 Worse cytological and histological findings in women living with HIV with persistenta and clearedb high-risk (hr) human papillomavirus (HPV) infection during the study period 2011–2014 (n = 71)
Full size table

Discussion

In this prospective cohort study of well-treated, hrHPV-positive WLWH in Denmark, more than 40% of the hrHPV positive had persistent hrHPV infection, a third had multiple hrHPV infections. HrHPV genotypes other than HPV16 and 18 predominated. CD4 < 350 cells/μL predicted genotype-specific hrHPV persistence. Cytological abnormalities were predicted by short duration of ART and prior AIDS.

Some have challenged the idea of inclusion of concurrent HPV testing in WLWH, due to the high incidence of cervical hrHPV in WLWH > 30 years of age, which may reduce the benefit of a combined HPV test and cervical cytology for CC screening in this population [32]. Still, a better triage test for HPV-infected WLWH to improve efficiency of cervical screening is of importance. While HPV testing offers many advantages over liquid-based cytology and is more sensitive in detection of high-grade precancerous lesions [33, 34], cervical cytology is more specific. However, in the WLWH population with a high HPV prevalence, HPV screening can lead to over-referral and adverse events associated with overtreatment (6). In Denmark more than 10% of WLWH have had a cone biopsy performed compared with 4% of women in the general population and the intervention was performed at earlier CIN stages [35]. Whether this reflects a more aggressive clinical practice for WLWH than women without HIV is unknown.

The relationship between HIV infection, persistent hrHPV and CC is not well understood [36]. It has been suggested that a combination of increased susceptibility to HPV infection, decreased ability to clear the infection caused by impaired cell-mediated immunity, and reactivation of latent HPV infection associated with immunosuppression could explain the both increased prevalence, incidence and persistence of hrHPV among WLWH [10]. A small study of 19 WLWH and 19 HIV-negative women suggested that high regulatory T-cells and low plasmacytoid dendritic cells levels might be associated with hrHPV persistence in both groups [36].

In Denmark, CC is highly prevalent [37] and our current findings on persistence is mirrored in a study including 2874 women from the general Danish population where hrHPV persistence was found in 31.4% of the hrHPV positive women [29], with a follow-up of 1 to 4.5 years vs. 2 years in the present study.

In the present study persistent genotype specific hrHPV infection was defined as hrHPV persistence lasting at least 1 year as done previously [29] and found in 43.7% of WLWH. Comparison of hrHPV persistence rates with other studies is in general hampered by variations in HPV detection between used molecular HPV tests [30] and in the definition of persistence [1, 38]. A study in WLWH from Nigeria found a 6 months hrHPV persistence rate of 15.9% using the SPF10-LiPA HPV test, which is highly sensitive for detection of HPV genotypes [14]. Likewise, the MACH-1 study, where the persistence rate was 55.8%, defined persistence as being positive in two samples more than 6 months apart [32] using the Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) hybridization assay and genotyping HC2 positive samples using HPV Line Blot Assay. For both studies, the interval to define persistence was short, and the used HPV testing strategy designed to pick up HPV infections with a high sensitivity. In contrast, a Brazilian study of HPV infected, pregnant WLWH with a test interval of 18 months found hrHPV persistence in 18 of 90 women (20.0%) if the study was re-calculated to the 13 genotypes considered hrHPV in the present study [30], but the pregnant status of the enrolled women changes the premise as previous studies have found HPV clearance to be more likely occur late in pregnancy or postpartum, than in the first two trimesters [30, 39]. Finally, an Italian study found 27/35 (77.1) WLWH to have hrHPV persistence at the end of 14 months follow-up [40].

Evidence is conflicting as to whether any hrHPV genotype persists longer than others [1]. Yet, it is well established that individual hrHPV genotypes differ in their relative carcinogenic potential [1,2,3,4,5]. Compared to HIV-negative women, as in the large Danish study [29], our and other previous reports show that WLWH have a higher proportion of multiple HPV infections [32, 41] with HPV genotypes other than HPV16 and 18 prevailing [13,14,15,16, 41]. In the SHADE study, the predominant hrHPV genotypes were HPV58, 52, 51, and 35 [13]. A worldwide review of almost 20,000 WLWH found that in the African region HPV16, 18 and 45 positivity increased consistently with severity of cervical diagnosis compared to normal cytological samples as well as in confirmed CC [4]. Among European WLWH only HPV33 positivity increased by severity [4]. The finding of non-HPV16 genotypes in high-grade CIN and CC in WLWH is proposed to be explained by the lower influence of immunodeficiency on HPV16 than on other hrHPV genotypes, due to the better intrinsic ability of HPV16 to evade immunological control even in immunocompetent individuals [42].

In an update on the natural history of HPV, Moscicki et al. [1] stated that the strongest factor resulting in persistent infection is likely the lack of an adequate immune response. This statement is supported by the results of the present and other cohorts [12, 30, 43], where current low CD4 count predicted hrHPV persistence. The impact of ART on hrHPV and HPV-related disease is still controversial [10, 11, 31]. Median ART duration in the present study was > 5 years, but no association with ART duration and hrHPV persistence was found. Since this study was performed before the publication of the START study advocating for early ART initiation [44], ART initiation was deferred until the occurrence of the following; HIV-related disease, AIDS defining illness, pregnancy and CD4 count< 350 cells/μl [45]. Therefore, WLWH initiated ART at later HIV stages than in recent studies, which is known to impact morbidity and mortality [11]. A study by Konopnicki et al. [31] suggests that > 3 years of undetectable HIV-RNA and > 1.5 years of CD4 counts of > 500 cells/μL are needed to obtain hrHPV clearance and demonstrated a decreased risk of persistent hrHPV infection in WLWH with sustained immunological reconstitution and long-lasting HIV suppression [31]. Other studies finding no effect of ART on HPV were mostly performed in the early ART era, and might therefore be affected by factors such as higher toxicity in older ART drugs, resulting in treatment delay and/or poor adherence [11]. The contradictory results regarding ART and HPV persistence might be owing to complex interactions between HPV, ART and duration and level of immunodeficiency/immune reconstitution [31, 46]. One study found that higher HPV16 viral loads were predictive of persistent HPV16 infection [47].

Our analyses of predictors of cytological abnormalities should be interpreted with caution due to the sample size. Nevertheless, ≥ASCUS and ≥ LSIL were predicted by short duration of ART, while ≥HSIL was predicted by prior AIDS, serving as a proxy of prior severe immunodeficiency. This difference in predictor may reflect that HPV infection is thought to progress via two pathways [17]; transient low-grade lesions that do not progress to high-grade CIN reflecting active HPV replication, and high-grade (precancerous) lesions mirroring HPV-induced transformation [17].

Limitations and strengths

Strengths include the well-characterized cohort and the use of nationwide registries. Furthermore, cytological abnormalities were followed-up by histopathological confirmation. Finally, HPV and cytology analyses were performed routinely in a tested, high-throughput, quality-controlled and quality-assured laboratory. The study has limitations including the lack of a control group, the fact that some patients did not participate in all planned visits, the relatively small sample size and accordingly low rate of CIN, precluding us from performing detailed analyses on high grade CIN. Finally, detection of HPV at two-time points could reflect clearance and subsequent reinfection and not real viral persistence [48], yet this limitation can only be overcome by massive, short interval testing outside the scope of most studies.

Conclusion

Studies on hrHPV persistence in WLWH are diverse and scarce. This prospective cohort study of well-treated WLWH in Denmark found a high rate of persistent hrHPV infections with predominantly non-16/18 hrHPV genotypes. Low CD4 count predicted hrHPV persistence, while prior AIDS predicted ≥HSIL, which supports continued focus on previously and currently immunocompromised WLWH with respect to screening for HPV-related cancers.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to confidentiality concerns but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ART:

Combined antiretroviral therapy

ASC-H:

Atypical squamous cells - cannot exclude HSIL

ASCUS:

Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance

CC:

Cervical cancer

CI:

Confidence interval

CIN:

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

CIN1:

CIN grade 1

CIN2:

CIN grade 2

CIN3:

CIN grade 3

CRS:

Civil Registration System

DF:

Degrees of freedom

DHCS:

Danish HIV Cohort Study

DPDB:

Danish Pathology Data Bank

HC2:

Hybrid capture 2

HPV:

Human papillomavirus

HR:

High-risk

HrHPV:

High-risk human papillomavirus

HSIL:

High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions

LSIL:

Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions

OR:

Odds ratio

PIN:

Personal identification number

PLWH:

People living with HIV

SHADE:

Study on HIV, cervical Abnormalities and infections in women in Denmark

SNOMED:

Systemized nomenclature of medicine

WLWH:

Women living with HIV

References

  1. Moscicki AB, Schiffman M, Burchell A, Albero G, Giuliano AR, Goodman MT, et al. Updating the natural history of human papillomavirus and anogenital cancers. Vaccine. 2012;30(Suppl 5):F24–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Thomsen LT, Frederiksen K, Munk C, Junge J, Iftner T, Kjaer SK. Long-term risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse according to high-risk human papillomavirus genotype and semi-quantitative viral load among 33,288 women with normal cervical cytology. Int J Cancer. 2015;137:193–203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Guan P, Howell-Jones R, Li N, Bruni L, de SS FS, et al. Human papillomavirus types in 115,789 HPV-positive women: a meta-analysis from cervical infection to cancer. Int J Cancer. 2012;131:2349–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Clifford GM, Tully S, Franceschi S. Carcinogenicity of human papillomavirus (HPV) types in HIV-positive women: a meta-analysis from HPV infection to cervical Cancer. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64:1228–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Silver MI, Andrews J, Cooper CK, Gage JC, Gold MA, Khan MJ, et al. Risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 or worse by cytology, human papillomavirus 16/18, and colposcopy impression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132:725–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Markowitz LE, Dunne EF, Saraiya M, Chesson HW, Curtis CR, Gee J, et al. Human papillomavirus vaccination: recommendations of the advisory committee on immunization practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep. 2014;63:1–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lees BF, Erickson BK, Huh WK. Cervical cancer screening: evidence behind the guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214:438–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ebisch RMF, Ketelaars PJW, van der Sanden WMH, Schmeink CE, Lenselink CH, Siebers AG, et al. Screening for persistent high-risk HPV infections may be a valuable screening method for young women; A retrospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0206219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kelly H, Weiss HA, Benavente Y, de SS MP. Association of antiretroviral therapy with high-risk human papillomavirus, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, and invasive cervical cancer in women living with HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet HIV. 2018;5:e45–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Denny LA, Franceschi S, de SS HI, Moscicki AB, Palefsky J. Human papillomavirus, human immunodeficiency virus and immunosuppression. Vaccine. 2012;30(Suppl 5):F168–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu G, Sharma M, Tan N, Barnabas RV. HIV-positive women have higher risk of human papilloma virus infection, precancerous lesions, and cervical cancer. AIDS. 2018;32:795-808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ahdieh L, Klein RS, Burk R, Cu-Uvin S, Schuman P, Duerr A et al. Prevalence, incidence, and type-specific persistence of human papillomavirus in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive and HIV-negative women. J Infect Dis. 2001;184:682-690.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Thorsteinsson K, Storgaard M, Katzenstein TL, Ladelund S, Ronsholt FF, Johansen IS, et al. Prevalence and distribution of cervical high-risk human papillomavirus and cytological abnormalities in women living with HIV in Denmark - the SHADE. BMC Cancer. 2016;16:866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Adebamowo SN, Olawande O, Famooto A, Dareng EO, Offiong R, Adebamowo CA. Persistent low-risk and high-risk human papillomavirus infections of the uterine cervix in HIV-negative and HIV-positive women. Front Public Health. 2017;5:178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. de PA KE, de CC MMH, Burchell AN, Klein M, et al. The EVVA Cohort Study: Anal and Cervical Type-Specific Human Papillomavirus Prevalence, Persistence, and Cytologic Findings in Women Living With HIV. J Infect Dis. 2017;216:447–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Konopnicki D, Manigart Y, Gilles C, Barlow P, de MJ FF, et al. High-risk human papillomavirus genotypes distribution in a cohort of HIV-positive women living in Europe: epidemiological implication for vaccination against human papillomavirus. AIDS. 2016;30:425–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Brickman C, Palefsky JM. Human papillomavirus in the HIV-infected host: epidemiology and pathogenesis in the antiretroviral era. Curr HIV /AIDS Rep. 2015;12:6–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lohse N, Obel N. Update of survival for persons with HIV infection in Denmark. Ann Intern Med. 2016;165:749–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. EACS Guidelines version 9.1 October 2018. Available from: http://www.eacsociety.org/files/2018_guidelines-9.1-english.pdf . Accessed 22 Jan 2019. 23-1-2019. 23-1-2019. Ref Type: Internet Communication.

  20. Kremer WW, Van ZM, Novianti PW, Richter KL, Verlaat W, Snijders PJ, et al. Detection of hypermethylated genes as markers for cervical screening in women living with HIV. J Int AIDS Soc. 2018;21:e25165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Statens Serum Institut. HIV infection and AIDS. http://www.ssi.dk/Service/Sygdomsleksikon/H/AIDS%20-%20HIV.aspx. Accessed 27 April 2017. Webpage in Danish. 27-4-2017. 27-4-2017. Ref Type: Internet Communication.

  22. Obel N, Engsig FN, Rasmussen LD, Larsen MV, Omland LH, Sorensen HT. Cohort profile: the Danish HIV cohort study. Int J Epidemiol. 2009;38:1202–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Thorsteinsson K, Ladelund S, Storgaard M, Ronsholt FF, Johansen IS, Pedersen G, et al. Sexually transmitted infections and use of contraceptives in women living with HIV in Denmark - the SHADE cohort. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16:81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lauritsen JM & Bruus M. EpiData (version 3.1). A comprehensive tool for validated entry and documentation of data. The EpiData Association, Odense, 2003-2005. 11-2-2015. Ref Type: Generic.

  25. Pedersen CB. The Danish civil registration system. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39:22–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Erichsen R, Lash TL, Hamilton-Dutoit SJ, Bjerregaard B, Vyberg M, Pedersen L. Existing data sources for clinical epidemiology: the Danish National Pathology Registry and data Bank. Clin Epidemiol. 2010;2:51–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, Moriarty A, O'Connor D, Prey M, et al. The 2001 Bethesda system: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA. 2002;287:2114–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bonde J, Rebolj M, Ejegod DM, Preisler S, Lynge E, Rygaard C. HPV prevalence and genotype distribution in a population-based split-sample study of well-screened women using CLART HPV2 human papillomavirus genotype microarray system. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:413. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-413.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Stensen S, Kjaer SK, Jensen SM, Frederiksen K, Junge J, Iftner T, et al. Factors associated with type-specific persistence of high-risk human papillomavirus infection: a population-based study. Int J Cancer. 2016;138:361–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Meyrelles AR, Siqueira JD, Santos PP, Hofer CB, Luiz RR, Seuanez HN, et al. Bonafide, type-specific human papillomavirus persistence among HIV-positive pregnant women: predictive value for cytological abnormalities, a longitudinal cohort study. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2016;111:120–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Konopnicki D, Manigart Y, Gilles C, Barlow P, de MJ FF, et al. Sustained viral suppression and higher CD4+ T-cell count reduces the risk of persistent cervical high-risk human papillomavirus infection in HIV-positive women. J Infect Dis. 2013;207:1723–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Heard I, Cubie HA, Mesher D, Sasieni P. Characteristics of HPV infection over time in European women who are HIV-1 positive. BJOG. 2013;120:41–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Tota JE, Bentley J, Blake J, Coutlee F, Duggan MA, Ferenczy A, et al. Approaches for triaging women who test positive for human papillomavirus in cervical cancer screening. Prev Med. 2017;98:15–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lorincz AT. Virtues and weaknesses of DNA methylation as a test for cervical Cancer prevention. Acta Cytol. 2016;60:501–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Thorsteinsson K, Ladelund S, Jensen-Fangel S, Katzenstein TL, Johansen IS, Pedersen G, et al. Incidence of cervical dysplasia and cervical cancer in women living with HIV in Denmark: comparison with the general population. HIV Med. 2016;17:7–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Strickler HD, Martinson J, Desai S, Xie X, Burk RD, Anastos K, et al. The relation of plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) and regulatory T-cells (Tregs) with HPV persistence in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected women. Viral Immunol. 2014;27:20–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Nygard M, Hansen BT, Dillner J, Munk C, Oddsson K, Tryggvadottir L, et al. Targeting human papillomavirus to reduce the burden of cervical, vulvar and vaginal cancer and pre-invasive neoplasia: establishing the baseline for surveillance. PLoS One. 2014;9:e88323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Woodman CB, Collins SI, Young LS. The natural history of cervical HPV infection: unresolved issues. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7:11–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Jalil EM, Bastos FI, Melli PP, Duarte G, Simoes RT, Yamamoto AY, et al. HPV clearance in postpartum period of HIV-positive and negative women: a prospective follow-up study. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Branca M, Garbuglia AR, Benedetto A, Cappiello T, Leoncini L, Migliore G, et al. Factors predicting the persistence of genital human papillomavirus infections and PAP smear abnormality in HIV-positive and HIV-negative women during prospective follow-up. Int J STD AIDS. 2003;14:417–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Dreyer G. Clinical implications of the interaction between HPV and HIV infections. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2018;47:95–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lin C, Franceschi S, Clifford GM. Human papillomavirus types from infection to cancer in the anus, according to sex and HIV status: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2018;18:198–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kang M, Cu-Uvin S. Association of HIV viral load and CD4 cell count with human papillomavirus detection and clearance in HIV-infected women initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy. HIV Med. 2012;13:372–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Lundgren JD, Babiker AG, Gordin F, Emery S, Grund B, Sharma S, et al. Initiation of antiretroviral therapy in early asymptomatic HIV infection. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:795–807.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Thorsteinsson K, Ladelund S, Jensen-Fangel S, Johansen IS, Katzenstein TL, Pedersen G, et al. Impact of gender on response to highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1 infected patients: a nationwide population-based cohort study. BMC Infect Dis. 2012;12:293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Palefsky JM. Antiretroviral therapy and anal cancer: the good, the bad, and the unknown. Sex Transm Dis. 2012;39:501–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Fontaine J, Hankins C, Money D, Rachlis A, Pourreaux K, Ferenczy A, et al. Human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV-16) viral load and persistence of HPV-16 infection in women infected or at risk for HIV. J Clin Virol. 2008;43:307–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Fife KH, Wu JW, Squires KE, Watts DH, Andersen JW, Brown DR. Prevalence and persistence of cervical human papillomavirus infection in HIV-positive women initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009;51:274–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are first and foremost grateful to all the women living with HIV for participating in the study. We further thank the staff of our clinical departments for their continuous support and enthusiasm at the participating centres in the SHADE cohort: Department of Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre (K Thorsteinsson); Department of Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet (AM Lebech, TL Katzenstein, FF Rönsholt); Department of Infectious Diseases, Odense University Hospital (IS Johansen); Department of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospitals, Skejby (M Storgaard); Department of Infectious Diseases, Aalborg University Hospital (G Pedersen); Department of Infectious Diseases, Nordsjællands Hospital (LN Nielsen). We also thank the Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, for the diligent work with the clinical HPV diagnostic on the collected samples. Finally, we would like to thank Maj-Britt Andersen from Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, on valuable knowledge on the DPDB.

Funding

This work was supported by the Danish Cancer Society and the AIDS Foundation, the Aragon Foundation, the Foundation of Aase and Ejnar Danielsens and the Foundation of Anna and Preben Simonsen. Grant numbers do not apply in a Danish setting. The sponsors of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation or writing of the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Infectious Diseases, Hvidovre Hospital, Kettegaards Allé 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark

    Kristina Thorsteinsson & Anne-Mette Lebech

  2. Clinical Research Center, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark

    Steen Ladelund

  3. Department of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark

    Merete Storgaard

  4. Department of Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Terese L. Katzenstein, Frederikke Falkencrone Rönsholt, Niels Obel & Anne-Mette Lebech

  5. Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Terese L. Katzenstein, Lisbeth Nilas & Niels Obel

  6. Department of Infectious Diseases, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark

    Isik Somuncu Johansen

  7. Department of Infectious Diseases, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark

    Gitte Pedersen

  8. Department of Infectious Diseases, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark

    Lars Nørregård Nielsen

  9. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark

    Lisbeth Nilas

  10. Molecular Pathology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark

    Maria Franzmann & Jesper Bonde

Authors
  1. Kristina Thorsteinsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Steen Ladelund
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Merete Storgaard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Terese L. Katzenstein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Isik Somuncu Johansen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Gitte Pedersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Frederikke Falkencrone Rönsholt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Lars Nørregård Nielsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Lisbeth Nilas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Maria Franzmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Niels Obel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Anne-Mette Lebech
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Jesper Bonde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

KT contributed to conception and design of the study, included patients, performed interviews and gynaecological examinations, analyzed and interpreted data, and drafted the manuscript. SL, biostatistician, was involved in analysis and interpretation of data, and critically reviewed the manuscript. MS contributed to conception and design of the study, included patients, performed interviews and gynaecological examinations, and critically reviewed the manuscript. TLK contributed to conception and design of the study, included patients, performed interviews and gynaecological examinations, and critically reviewed the manuscript. ISJ contributed to conception and design of the study, included patients, performed interviews and gynaecological examinations, and critically reviewed the manuscript. GP contributed to conception and design of the study, included patients, performed interviews, and critically reviewed the manuscript. FFR included patients, performed interviews and gynaecological examinations, and critically reviewed the manuscript. LNN included patients and performed interviews, and critically reviewed the manuscript. LN, performed gynaecological examinations in WLWH needing gynaecological follow-up and provided valuable information on gynaecological procedures in Denmark, and critically reviewed the manuscript. MF, pathologist, provided valuable information on the DPDB, and critically reviewed the manuscript. NO, head of the DHCS, provided data from the DHCS, and critically reviewed the manuscript. AML, principal investigator, contributed to conception and design of the study, included patients and performed interviews and gynaecological examinations, was involved in analysis and interpretation of data, and critically reviewed the manuscript. JB was in charge of the analyses of HPV, was involved in analysis and interpretation of data and critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristina Thorsteinsson.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

At entry, written and oral informed consent was obtained from all participants. The study and the DHCS were approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (2012-41-0005, 2012-58-0004 and 2015–231-0126). Further, the study was approved by the Danish Regional Committee on Health Research Ethics (H-3-2010-119 and H-2-2014-102).

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

KT has received research funding from Abbott, a travel grant from Janssen-Cilag and honoraria from Janssen-Cilag, BMS and GlaxoSmithKline/Viiv. Since the paper in question was initiated, SL, has taken up a position in Novo Nordisk A/S working within the insulin franchise. For this paper SL is affiliating Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre. MS has received an unrestricted grant from Gilead. TLK has received research funding and/or honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, GlaxoSmithKline/Viiv, Abbott, Gilead, and Janssen-Cilag. AML has received travel grant and/or honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead and GlaxoSmithKline. JB attended meetings with various HPV device manufacturers. JB used to serve as a paid advisor to Roche and Genomica and has received honoraria from Hologic/Gen-probe, Roche, Qiagen, Genomica, and BD Diagnostics for lectures, and is the principal investigator on projects funded by BD Diagnostics, Genomica, and Qiagen. IJ, GP, FR, LNN, LN, MF, and NO discloses no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional files

Additional file 1:

Questionnaire at visit 1 (inclusion). A questionnaire regarding information on tobacco use, age at sexual debut, lifetime sexual partners, prior condyloma, HPV vaccination status, and contraceptive use. (DOC 127 kb)

Additional file 2:

Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios for predictors of atypical cells of undetermined significance or worse (ASCUS+). A table presenting the unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios for predictors of atypical cells of undetermined significance or worse (ASCUS+). (DOCX 18 kb)

Additional file 3:

Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios for predictors of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or worse (LSIL+). A table presenting the unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios for predictors of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or worse (LSIL+). (DOCX 17 kb)

Additional file 4:

Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios for predictors of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or worse (HSIL+). A table presenting the Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios for predictors of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or worse (HSIL+). (DOCX 18 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thorsteinsson, K., Ladelund, S., Storgaard, M. et al. Persistence of cervical high-risk human papillomavirus in women living with HIV in Denmark – the SHADE. BMC Infect Dis 19, 740 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4377-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4377-5

Keywords

BMC Infectious Diseases

ISSN: 1471-2334

Contact us