Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Infectious Diseases

Research article
Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Predictive implications of albumin and C-reactive protein for progression to pneumonia and poor prognosis in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

  • Kaito Harada1,
  • Noritaka Sekiya2Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
  • Tatsuya Konishi1,
  • Akihito Nagata1,
  • Yuta Yamada1,
  • Toshiaki Takezaki1,
  • Satoshi Kaito1,
  • Shuhei Kurosawa1,
  • Masahiro Sakaguchi1,
  • Shunichiro Yasuda1,
  • Shugo Sasaki2,
  • Kosuke Yoshioka1,
  • Kyoko Watakabe-Inamoto1,
  • Aiko Igarashi1,
  • Yuho Najima1,
  • Takeshi Hagino1,
  • Hideharu Muto1,
  • Takeshi Kobayashi1,
  • Noriko Doki1,
  • Kazuhiko Kakihana1,
  • Hisashi Sakamaki1 and
  • Kazuteru Ohashi1
BMC Infectious DiseasesBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:638

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2745-6

©  The Author(s). 2017

Received: 29 March 2017

Accepted: 18 September 2017

Published: 22 September 2017

Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (S. maltophilia) bacteremia causes significant morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised hosts. However, incidence and risk factors for mortality in S. maltophilia bacteremia following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remain controversial. The primary aim of this study is to clarify factors associated with poor prognosis of allo-HSCT recipients with S. maltophilia bacteremia.

Methods

From January 2005 to December 2014, patients with hematological diseases and S. maltophilia bacteremia at a single transplantation center in Japan were examined for incidence and 90-day mortality. Prognostic factors associated with 90-day mortality among allo-HSCT recipients were analyzed by log-rank test, and significant variables in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate Cox proportional-hazards regression model.

Results

A total of 65 patients, including 47 patients undergoing allo-HSCT, developed S. maltophilia bacteremia. The incidence of S. maltophilia bacteremia was significantly higher in allo-HSCT recipients compared to patients not receiving allo-HSCT (6.53 vs. 0.36 per 100 admissions, respectively; p < 0.01). The overall 90-day mortality in allo-HSCT recipients was 43%. Independent risk factors for 90-day mortality were low serum albumin (<3.0 g/dl) (HR = 10.86; 95% CI, 3.27–36.12) and high serum C-reactive protein (CRP) (≥10.0 mg/dl) (HR = 3.28; 95% CI, 1.00–10.72). Among 9 patients with both high CRP and low albumin, 5 had pneumonia at the onset of bacteremia and the remaining 4 patients developed pneumonia in a median of 3 days (range, 1 to 8 days) even under effective treatment. All 9 patients eventually died in a median of 2 days (range, 2 to 32 days). The probabilities of developing pneumonia in patients with or without high CRP and low albumin levels were 100% (9/9) and 10.5% (4/38), respectively (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Allo-HSCT recipients had higher rates of S. maltophilia bacteremia than did patients not receiving allo-HSCT. High serum CRP and low serum albumin at the onset of bacteremia are predictive of disease progression to pneumonia and poor prognosis.

Keywords

AlbuminC-reactive protein Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Background

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (S. maltophilia) is a nosocomial, aerobic, glucose non-fermentative gram-negative bacillus that can be isolated from natural or hospital environments [1–3]. Although S. maltophilia possesses a limited pathogenicity, the organism can cause serious infections in immunocompromised hosts, especially in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients [3, 4].

As allo-HSCT recipients are a severely immunocompromised population with complex comorbidities, these individuals are more likely to have multiple risk factors and to develop fatal infections such as hemorrhagic pneumonia than are patients receiving chemotherapy or autologous (auto)-HSCT [3, 5–8]. Several studies have reported predisposing risk factors for S. maltophilia infection among allo-HSCT recipients; these factors include prolonged neutropenia, existence of graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD), indwelling central venous catheters (CVC), urinary catheters, prior treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics, prolonged hospitalization, diarrhea, and severe mucositis [3, 7–9]. Therefore, data for incidence, morbidity, and mortality in allo-HSCT recipients should be analyzed separately from those in patients not receiving allo-HSCT. However, few studies have examined the precise incidence rate of S. maltophilia bacteremia in allo-HSCT recipients, despite the increasing incidence of this infection in heterogeneous populations including allo-HSCT recipients and patients receiving chemotherapy or auto-HSCT [10–12]. Additionally, past studies have revealed that profound neutropenia, septic shock at the onset of bacteremia, pneumonia, inappropriate antimicrobial therapy, and presence of CVCs were risk factors for mortality of S. maltophilia bacteremia in heterogeneous groups [5, 6, 11–13]. Nevertheless, risk factors for mortality focusing on allo-HSCT recipients have not been investigated in depth.

The objective of this study is to investigate the incidence, clinical characteristics, treatment outcome, and risk factors for mortality of allo-HSCT recipients with S. maltophilia bacteremia in a single bone marrow transplantation center in Japan over a 10-year interval.

Methods

Patients

From January 2005 to December 2014, data on demographic and clinical characteristics, laboratory data, antimicrobial susceptibility, treatment, and outcome were collected for all S. maltophilia bacteremia cases observed at an 800-bed tertiary care hospital with a 32-bed transplantation ward. All cases identified in patients with hematological diseases were included. This study was approved by the Ethics Review Committee in our hospital.

Definition and microbiology

S. maltophilia bacteremia was defined as at least one positive blood culture of S. maltophilia with clinical signs of infection. Initial source of infection consisted of central line-associated blood stream infection (CLABSI), pneumonia, cellulitis, and sources unknown. CLABSI was diagnosed when S. maltophilia was detected from the CVC tip with a positive blood culture, or according to the widely accepted definition of differential time to positivity [14]. Pneumonia and cellulitis were defined as active clinical signs and symptoms with newly detected imaging findings consistent with the site of infection, with or without isolation of the organism from concomitant specimens [11, 15]. The BacT/Alert 3D (bioMérieux, France) automated blood culture system was used. Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of isolates also were conducted using the MicroScan Walkaway plus System (Beckman Coulter, Inc., USA) based on Manual M100-S23 of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Polymicrobial, continuous, and breakthrough bacteremia were defined as follows: bacteremia due to multiple organisms including S. maltophilia; bacteremia due to S. maltophilia that was detected persistently in the same patient; bacteremia in patients receiving appropriate therapy for the microorganism that was grown from the blood [11, 16]. Effective antimicrobial therapy was defined as the use of one or more agent active against S. maltophilia in an adequate dose [17]. Severe sepsis and septic shock were defined by the SSCG2012 criteria [18]. S. maltophilia-related mortality was judged by a review of the medial chart. Patients who succumbed to S. maltophilia bacteremia or complications of the bacteremia, not primary hematological disease itself, were judged as S. maltophilia-related deaths. In the analysis of S. maltophilia-related mortality, patients who died, but were not judged as S. maltophilia-related deaths, were censored on the date of death. Neutropenia was defined as an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) less than 0.5 × 109/L. Profound and prolonged neutropenia were defined as an ANC less than 0.1 × 109/L and less than 0.5 × 109/L for more than 14 days, respectively. Neutrophil engraftment was defined by an ANC of at least 0.5 × 109/L for 3 consecutive days. Adverse events, such as diarrhea and mucositis, were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. Conditioning intensity was classified as myeloablative or reduced-intensity conditioning according to Center and International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research classification [19]. Our policies of antimicrobial prophylaxis in allo-HSCT were as follows: levofloxacin for bacterial infections; fluconazole, itraconazole, or voriconazole for fungal infections; trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) or pentamidine inhalation for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia; and acyclovir for viral infections. Cefepime, tazobactam-piperacillin, or meropenem was administered for empirical treatment of febrile neutropenia according to the IDSA guidelines [20].

Statistical analysis

We compared allo-HSCT recipients with patients not receiving allo-HSCT to investigate the incidence, clinical characteristics, and mortality. Patients not receiving allo-HSCT were consisted of those with non-malignant hematological disorders, and those who received chemotherapies or auto-HSCT. Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables and the Mann-Whitney U-test for continuous variables were used. Prognostic factors associated with 90-day mortality among allo-HSCT recipients only were analyzed by log-rank test according to age, sex, C-reactive protein (CRP), albumin, creatinine, neutropenia, onset of bacteremia, existence of acute GVHD, primary disease risk, presence of polymicrobial bacteremia, severe sepsis or septic shock, initial source of infection, removal of CVC, source of transplantation, related or unrelated source, HLA mismatching, conditioning intensity, sex mismatching, antibody of cytomegalovirus in recipients, ABO mismatching, and study period. The serum values of CRP, albumin, and creatinine were assessed at the onset of bacteremia. The cut-off values of albumin and CRP were determined using Receiver Operating Characteristics curve analysis (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Significant variables in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate Cox proportional-hazards regression model with stepwise method, and both hazard-ratios and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. Two-tailed p-values of less than 0.05 were considered significant. All statistical analyses were conducted using EZR software [21].

Results

Incidence of S. maltophilia bacteremia

There were 5679 admissions and 720 allo-HSCTs with 191,090 patient-days during the study period. A total of 65 patients with S. maltophilia bacteremia were identified, with the incidence of 1.14 cases per 100 admissions and 3.40 cases per 10,000 patient-days. The incidence of S. maltophilia bacteremia was significantly higher in allo-HSCT recipients compared to patients not receiving allo-HSCT (6.53 vs. 0.36 per 100 admissions, respectively; p < 0.01, and 6.19 vs. 1.56 per 10,000 patient-days, respectively; p < 0.01). Notably, the overall incidence of S. maltophilia bacteremia increased during the latter 5-year period compared to the former 5-year period (1.79 vs. 0.63 per 100 admissions, respectively; p < 0.01; Fig. 1). Among the 720 allo-HSCT cases during the study period, there were no significant differences in the incidence of S. maltophilia bacteremia between each stem cell source, 7.3% (34/468) in bone marrow, 4.4% (7/158) in peripheral blood, and 6.3% (6/94) in cord blood (p = 0.42).
Figure 1
Fig. 1

Cases and incidence of S. maltophilia bacteremia in Komagome Hospital patients with hematological diseases from 2005 to 2014

Patient characteristics

Of all patients with S. maltophilia bacteremia, 47 (72.3%) had received allo-HSCT. Compared with patients not receiving allo-HSCT, allo-HSCT recipients were younger (median; 49 vs. 59 years old; p = 0.02), and more likely to have diarrhea (55.3% vs. 16.7%; p < 0.01), mucositis (42.6% vs. 5.6%; p < 0.01), CVC (95.7% vs. 61.1%; p < 0.01), total parenteral nutrition (44.7% vs. 5.6%; p < 0.01), and insulin therapy within 7 days (27.7% vs. 0%; p = 0.01) (Table 1). Although the overall 90-day mortality rate in allo-HSCT recipients was nominally higher (42.6% [20/47] in allo-HSCT vs. 27.8% [5/18] in non-allo-HSCT), the difference was not significant (p = 0.28; Fig. 2a). Similarly, the S. maltophilia-related 90-day mortality rate was nominally higher in allo-HSCT recipients compared to non-allo-HSCT recipients, but this difference was not statistically significant (34.0% [16/47] vs. 22.2% [4/18], respectively; p = 0.35; Fig. 2b).
Table 1

Comparison of patient characteristics between patients receiving allo-HSCT and patients receiving chemotherapy or auto-HSCT

  

Allo-HSCT (n = 47)

Chemotherapy or auto-HSCT (n = 18)

p-value

Age

median, (range)

49 (19–70)

59 (21–77)

0.02

Sex

Male (%)

30 (64)

8 (44)

 

Female (%)

17 (36)

10 (56)

 

Primary disease

AML

22 (46.8)

10 (55.6)

 

ALL

9 (19.1)

2 (11.1)

 

MDS

8 (17.0)

1 (5.6)

 

CML

3 (6.4)

0 (0.0)

 

AA

2 (4.3)

1 (5.6)

 

Aggressive NK leukemia

1 (2.1)

0 (0.0)

 

NHL

1 (2.1)

0 (0.0)

 

PMF

1 (2.1)

0 (0.0)

 

Myeloma

0 (0.0)

3 (16.7)

 

Creatinine (mg/dl)

median, (range)

0.70 (0.3–3.0)

0.60 (0.3–6.3)

 

CRP (mg/dl)

median, (range)

5.6 (0.3–40.8)

5.6 (0.2–34.0)

 

Albumin (g/dl)

median, (range)

3.2 (1.6–4.2)

2.9 (2.10–4.20)

 

Neutropenia (%)

 

31 (66.0)

13 (72.2)

 

 Profound neutropenia (%)

 

21 (44.7)

10 (55.6)

 

 Duration of neutropenia (days)

median, (range)

5.5 (0–30)

4.5 (1–42)

 

 Prolonged neutropenia (%)

 

14 (29.8)

6 (33.3)

 

Initial source of infection (%)

Sources unknown

26 (55.3)

13 (72.2)

 

Cellulitis

3 (6.4)

1 (5.6)

 

CLABSI

13 (27.7)

4 (22.2)

 

Pneumonia

5 (10.6)

0 (0.0)

 

Continuous bacteremia (%)

 

31 (66.0)

7 (38.9)

 

Polymicrobial bacteremia (%)

 

19 (40.4)

5 (27.8)

 

Severe sepsis or septic shock (%)

 

20 (42.6)

3 (16.7)

 

Primary disease risk (%)a

High

25 (53.2)

9 (50.0)

 

Central venous catheter (%)

 

45 (95.7)

11 (61.1)

<0.01

Mucositis (%)

 

20 (42.6)

1 (5.6)

<0.01

Diarrhea (%)

 

26 (55.3)

3 (16.7)

<0.01

Total parenteral nutrition (%)b

 

21 (44.7)

1 (5.6)

<0.01

Administration of insulin (%)b

 

13 (27.7)

0 (0.0)

0.01

Urine catheter (%)

 

12 (25.5)

1 (5.6)

 

Past history of broad-antibiotics (%)c

 

34 (72.3)

14 (77.8)

 

Past history of carbapenem (%)c

 

24 (51.1)

10 (55.6)

 

Decade

2005 to 2009 (%)

14 (29.8)

6 (33.3)

 

2010 to 2014 (%)

33 (70.2)

12 (66.7)

 

Time to appropriate therapy

median, (range)

3 (0–30)

  

Source of transplantation (%)

BM

34 (72.3)

  

PB

7 (14.9)

  

CB

6 (12.8)

  

Related or Unrelated donor (%)

Related donor

10 (21.3)

  

Unrelated donor

37 (78.7)

  

HLA-matched donor (%)

 

22 (46.8)

  

Conditioning intensity

Myeloablative

33 (70.2)

  

Reduced-intensity

14 (29.8)

  

Acute GVHD (%)d

 

15 (31.9)

  

 Grade (%)

I

4 (26.7)

  

II

10 (66.7)

  

III

1 (6.7)

  

 Manifestation of acute GVHDe

Skin

14 (93.3)

  

Gut

4 (26.7)

  

Onset of bacteremia

During conditioning

1 (2.1)

  

Before engraftment

31 (66.0)

  

After engraftment

15 (31.9)

  

Days from transplantation (days)

median, (range)

18 (−6–1434)

  

Abbreviations: allo-HSCT allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, auto-HSCT autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, AML acute myeloid leukemia, ALL acute lymphoblastic leukemia, MDS myelodysplastic syndrome, CML chronic myeloid leukemia, CMML chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, NHL non-Hodgkin lymphoma, PMF primary myelofibrosis, AA aplastic anemia, CRP c-reactive protein, CLABSI central-line associated blood stream infection, GVHD graft-versus-host disease, BM bone marrow, PB peripheral blood, CB cord blood, HLA human leukocyte antigen

The level of creatinine, CRP, albumin, and neutrophil count were applied from the point of onset of bacteremia

aPrimary disease risk was classified into 2 categories; high-risk included acute leukemia not in remission, myelodysplastic syndrome with excess blast count or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, chronic myeloid leukemia in blast crisis, the others were classified as standard-risk

bTotal parenteral nutrition and insulin therapy were considered, if they were used within one week from the onset of bacteremia

cBroad-antibiotics included cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam, and meropenem administered within past 30-days

dAcute GVHD was diagnosed and graded in accordance with previous reported consensus [35]

eThree patients had both skin and gut acute GVHD at the onset of bacteremia

Figure 2
Fig. 2

Overall (a) and S. maltophilia-related mortality (b) in allo-HSCT recipients or in patients not receiving allo-HSCT. A vertical line (|) indicates censoring from the analysis

Among the S. maltophilia strains isolated from patients, antimicrobial susceptibility to TMP-SMX, minocycline, levofloxacin, and ceftazidime was observed in 94%, 100%, 92%, and 40% of the strains, respectively. These frequencies were not significantly different between allo-HSCT recipients and patients not receiving allo-HSCT (data not shown).

Among allo-HSCT recipients, 8 out of 47 (17%) patients developed breakthrough S. maltophilia bacteremia. One of these 8 patients had received levofloxacin, and the other 7 of 8 were receiving TMP-SMX at the onset of S. maltophilia bacteremia. The probabilities of development of all-graded and graded II to IV acute GVHD at the onset of S. maltophilia bacteremia among 47 allo-HSCT recipients were 31.9% and 23.4%, respectively. Most of the patients with all-graded acute GVHD (14/15) had skin manifestations, and only 4 out of 15 patients had gut manifestations. Days from transplantation to onset of S. maltophilia bacteremia was 18 days (range, −6 to 1434), and 17 of the 47 (34.1%) allo-HSCT recipients developed S. maltophilia bacteremia after achievement of neutrophil engraftment.

Risk factors for overall 90-day mortality in allo-HSCT recipients

Among 47 allo-HSCT recipients, univariate analysis showed that high levels of serum CRP (≥10.0 mg/dl), low levels of serum albumin (<3.0 g/dl), increased serum creatinine levels (≥1.0 mg/dl), high disease risk, severe sepsis or septic shock, initial source of infection, time to appropriate therapy, non-removal of CVC, and reduced-intensity conditioning regimens were significant risk factors for overall 90-day mortality. Independent risk factors associated with overall 90-day mortality were high levels of serum CRP (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 3.28; 95% CI, 1.00–10.72; p = 0.05) and low levels of serum albumin (aHR, 10.86; 95% CI, 3.27–36.12; p < 0.01) (Table 2). Figure 3 shows overall 90-day mortality stratified by levels of serum albumin and CRP at the onset of bacteremia. Overall 90-day mortalities in patients with or without low levels of albumin were 87.5% and 20.7%, respectively (p < 0.01), and those in patients with or without high levels of CRP were 71.4% and 30.3%, respectively (p < 0.01). The distribution of the values of albumin and CRP, and the correlation of the values of albumin or CRP and survival days are shown in Additional file 2: Figure S2 and Additional file 3: Figure S3, respectively.
Table 2

Risk factors for overall 90-day mortality in allo-HSCT recipients with S. maltophilia bacteremia

 

Univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

 

Probability of survival

p-value

Hazard ratio

95% CI

p-value

Age (years)

≥60

0.63 (0.45–0.77)

0.13

   

<60

0.42 (0.15–0.67)

    

Sex

Male

0.60 (0.41–0.75)

0.67

   

Female

0.53 (0.28–0.73)

    

CRP (mg/dl)

≥10

0.29 (0.09–0.52)

<0.01

3.28

1.00–10.72

0.05

<10

0.70 (0.51–0.82)

    

Albumin (g/dl)

<3.0

0.13 (0.02–0.33)

<0.01

10.86

3.27–36.12

<0.01

≥3.0

0.79 (0.59–0.90)

    

Creatinine (mg/dl)

≥1.0

0.25 (0.06–0.51)

<0.01

   

<1.0

0.69 (0.51–0.81)

    

Neutropenia (≤500 /μl)

Yes

0.55 (0.36–0.70)

0.52

   

No

0.63 (0.35–0.81)

    

Profound neutropenia (≤100 /μl)

Yes

0.48 (0.26–0.67)

0.1

   

No

0.65 (0.44–0.80)

    

Prolonged neutropenia (≥7 days)

Yes

0.79 (0.47–0.93)

0.08

   

No

0.49 (0.31–0.64)

    

Onset of bacteremia

During conditioning

1.00 (1.00–1.00)

0.73

   

Before engraftment

0.60 (0.32–0.80)

    

After engraftment

0.55 (0.36–0.70)

    

Existence of acute GVHD

Yes

0.47 (0.21–0.69)

0.44

   

No

0.63 (0.44–0.77)

    

Diarrhea

Yes

0.62 (0.40–0.77)

0.64

   

No

0.52 (0.30–0.71)

    

Mucositis

Yes

0.60 (0.36–0.78)

0.89

   

No

0.56 (0.35–0.72)

    

Primary disease risk

High

0.40 (0.21–0.58)

<0.01

   

Standard

0.77 (0.54–0.89)

    

Polymicrobial bacteremia

Yes

0.58 (0.33–0.76)

0.88

   

No

0.57 (0.37–0.73)

    

Severe sepsis or septic shock

Yes

0.30 (0.12–0.50)

<0.01

   

No

0.78 (0.57–0.89)

    

Initial source of infection

Sources unknown

0.58 (0.37–0.74)

<0.01

   

Cellulitis

1.00 (1.00–1.00)

    

CLABSI

0.69 (0.37–0.87)

    

Pneumonia

0.00 (NA)

    

Time to appropriate therapy (days)

≥4

0.76 (0.54–0.88)

0.05

   

≤3

0.47 (0.23–0.68)

    

Removal of CVC

Yes

0.92 (0.57–0.99)

<0.01

   

No

0.44 (0.27–0.60)

    

Past history of carbapenem

Yes

0.46 (0.26–0.64)

0.05

   

No

0.70 (0.47–0.84)

    

Source of transplantation

BM

0.62 (0.43–0.76)

0.17

   

PB

0.57 (0.17–0.84)

    

CB

0.33 (0.05–0.68)

    

Donor type

Related

0.80 (0.41–0.95)

0.1

   

Unrelated

0.51 (0.34–0.66)

    

HLA-matching

Match

0.64 (0.40–0.79)

0.38

   

Mismatch

0.52 (0.31–0.69)

    

Conditioning

Myeloablative

0.73 (0.54–0.85)

<0.01

   

Reduced-intensity

0.21 (0.05–0.45)

    

Study period

2005–2009

0.57 (0.28–0.78)

0.95

   

2010–2014

0.58 (0.39–0.72)

    

Abbreviations: Allo-HSCT allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, S. maltophilia Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, CI confedence interval, CRP c-reactive protein, GVHD graft-versus-host disease, CLABSI central-line associated blood stream infection, CVC central venous catheter, NA not available, BM bone marrow, PB peripheral blood, CB cord blood, HLA human leukocyte antigen

Figure 3
Fig. 3

Overall mortality in allo-HSCT recipients stratified by the levels of serum albumin (a) and CRP (b) at the onset of bacteremia

Details for patients with low levels of albumin and high levels of CRP are shown in Table 3. Among 9 recipients with both high CRP and low albumin levels, 4 recipients had neutrophil counts equal to or exceeding 500/μl at the onset of bacteremia, and 8 recipients had severe sepsis or septic shock. Although 5 recipients had pneumonia at the onset of bacteremia, the remaining 4 recipients developed pneumonia, even under effective treatments, in a median of 3 days (range, 1 to 8 days). All 9 patients eventually died in a median of 2 days (range, 2 to 32 days), and all of these deaths were attributable to S. maltophilia bacteremia. One individual (Patient No. 9) survived 32 days from the onset of bacteremia after receiving a combination therapy of tigecycline (TGC) and TMP-SMX. The probabilities of developing pneumonia in patients with or without high CRP and low albumin levels were 100% (9/9) and 10.5% (4/38), respectively (p < 0.01).
Table 3

Details of 9 patients with low albumin and high CRP

No.

Age

Primary disease

Stem cell source

Conditioning

Duration from transplantation to infection (days)

Engraftment

CRP (mg/dl)

Albumin (g/dl)

Severe sepsis or septic shock

Initial source of infection

Subsequent progression to pneumonia (days)

Treatment

Survival (days)

1

32

AML

uBM

BU+CY+TLI

124

Yes

11.6

1.9

-

Sources unknown

Yes (1)

MINO

12

2

58

AML

CB

Flu+Mel+TBI

26

No

14.4

2.3

Severe

Pneumonia

 

-

2

3

54

AML

CB

CA+CY+TBI

15

Yes

18.5

2.5

Severe

Sources unknown

Yes (5)

MINO

7

4

70

CMLBC

CB

Flu+Mel+TBI

20

No

40.8

2.9

Severe

Pneumonia

 

CPFX

2

5

69

AML

uBM

Flu+Mel+TBI

11

Yes

19.8

2.6

Shock

Pneumonia

 

-

2

6

64

PMF

uBM

Flu+Mel+TBI

34

No

25.3

1.6

Severe

Pneumonia

 

CPFX

2

7

57

FL

uPB

Flu+CY+TBI

10

No

15.9

2.4

Shock

Sources unknown

Yes (8)

CPFX+MINO

10

8

30

AML

uBM

CY+TBI

373

Yes

23

1.6

Shock

CLABSI

Yes (1)

CPFX+MINO→ST+MINO

2

9

56

AML

uBM

Flu+BU+TBI

17

No

17.8

1.6

Severe

Pneumonia and cellulitis

 

TGC→ST+TGC

32

Abbreviations: AML acute myeloid leukemia, CMLBC chronic myeloid leukemia blast crisis, PMF primary myelofibrosis, FL follicular lymphoma, uBM unrelated-bone marrow, CB cord blood, uPB unrelated-peripheral blood, BU busulfan, CY cyclophosphamide, TLI total lymphoid irradiation, Flu fludarabine, Mel melphalan, TBI total body irradiation, CRP c-reactive protein, CLABSI central-line associated blood stream infection, MINO minocycline, CPFX ciprofloxacin, ST trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, TGC tigecycline

Overall 90-day mortality based on antimicrobial regimen

Allo-HSCT recipients with S. maltophilia bacteremia received various combination therapies or monotherapies, which consisted of ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, TMP-SMX, minocycline, TGC, or the combination thereof. The overall 90-day mortality rate for the antimicrobial regimens did not differ significantly (39.4% with TMP-SMX or minocycline, 66.7% with ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin, and 37.5% without any effective antibiotic; p = 0.42).

The rate of receiving effective antimicrobials within 3 days from the onset of bacteremia was 42.6%. Landmark analysis showed that there was no significant difference in overall 90-day mortality between patients with or without receiving effective antimicrobials within 3 days from the onset (42.9% vs. 26.3%, respectively; p = 0.16), even among recipients with high CRP or low albumin levels (37.5% vs. 37.5%, respectively; p = 0.74).

Discussion

In the present study, we showed a higher incidence of S. maltophilia bacteremia in allo-HSCT recipients than in patients not receiving allo-HSCT. Low levels of albumin and high levels of CRP were found to be risk factors for overall 90-day mortality in allo-HSCT recipients. Additionally, all patients with low albumin and high CRP levels developed pneumonia initially or subsequently, even with the administration of effective antimicrobials, and subsequently died.

The present study indicated a higher incidence of S. maltophilia bacteremia in allo-HSCT recipients. Yeshurun et al. reported a higher incidence of S. maltophilia bacteremia in allo-HSCT recipients compared with auto-HSCT recipients (5.6% vs. 1%, respectively) [10]. However, their report included only 19 episodes of bacteremia over four years. Other study showed that the incidence of S. maltophilia bacteremia was 1.34 cases per 10,000 patient-days among patients with hematological malignancy [11]. Although these incidences were apparently lower, we think the differences could mainly be attributed to differences in patient characteristics. First, the rate of the patients receiving allo-HSCT in our study was more than three-fold higher compared to that in the study (72% vs. 23%, respectively). Second, allo-HSCT recipients were younger, and more likely to have diarrhea, mucositis, CVC, total parenteral nutrition, and/or insulin therapy. Most of these factors are considered as predisposing risk factors for S. maltophilia bacteremia based on the results of past studies [3, 7–9]. Notably, we saw no evidence or report of horizontal spread of S. maltophilia during our study; this lack presumably reflected strict monitoring for rapid detection of outbreaks through daily investigations by an infection control team at our facility.

Our study also demonstrated the increasing incidence of S. maltophilia bacteremia over the last 5 years, a pattern that is consistent with those of previous studies [4, 12, 22]. This elevated incidence of S. maltophilia bacteremia may reflect the increasing use of more profound immunosuppressive agents for prevention and treatment of GVHD in the last 5 years; the rate of additional immunosuppressive agents other than calcineurin inhibitor rose from 35.7% in the early period to 60.6% in the later period. The effect may also reflect increasing frequencies of HSCT in high-risk patients, with the procedure now being employed in older patients (median ages rising from 41 years in the earlier period to 53 years in the later period) and in patients with active primary diseases (42.9% vs. 57.6%, respectively).

The overall mortality rate of S. maltophilia bacteremia in the present study (42.6%) was comparable to that obtained in past studies, where reported rates ranged from 21 to 64.5% [7, 8, 11, 23]. As noted above, the characteristics of allo-HSCT recipients differed significantly from those of patients not receiving allo-HSCT. Therefore, it is important to clarify risk factors for mortality specific to allo-HSCT recipients. In the present study, high CRP levels and low albumin levels were found to be risk factors for overall 90-day mortality in allo-HSCT recipients. Although CRP is an acute-phase protein which increases in response to infection, its prognostic value has been evaluated in various settings [24–26]. Serum albumin is also one of the negative acute-phase proteins as well as an indicator of previous malnutrition. Several reports showed that serum albumin levels were associated with prognosis in pneumonia, severe sepsis, and bacteremia [26–28]. Additionally, it was demonstrated that a combination of CRP and albumin levels was better prognostic marker rather than either parameter alone [29, 30]. Tada et al. [7] reported that high serum CRP levels were associated with S. maltophilia hemorrhagic pneumonia, known to be one of the most fatal forms of S. maltophilia infection. That study revealed 100% mortality among 7 patients with hemorrhagic pneumonia due to S. maltophilia. In addition, Mori et al. reported 30 episodes of hemorrhagic pneumonia caused by S. maltophilia, and those authors also noted detrimental outcomes, yielding 100% mortality [31]. Our results are consistent with those studies, and the combination of high CRP and low albumin levels appears to readily predict the prognosis of S. maltophilia bacteremia. Not only did all 5 patients having pneumonia at the onset of bacteremia die, but also all 4 patients who subsequently developed pneumonia during the treatment of bacteremia followed a fatal clinical course, despite receiving effective antimicrobial therapies. If allo-HSCT recipients with S. maltophilia bacteremia have respiratory symptoms (such as cough, sputum, chest pain, and desaturations) or have risk factors as above, clinicians should consider the possibility of hemorrhagic pneumonia by S. maltophilia or subsequent progression to pneumonia. When a sputum culture is ordered, the result of Gram staining would be a clue for rapid detection of pneumonia.

Levofloxacin and TGC had recently been proposed as alternative options beyond TMP-SMX in the treatment of S. maltophilia infections [32, 33]. In cases involving allo-HSCT recipients, clinicians might hesitate to administer TMP-SMX due to hematologic toxicity, especially during the pre-engraftment period. Our study demonstrated the fatal outcomes of allo-HSCT recipients with low albumin and high CRP levels when such patients were treated empirically with ciprofloxacin or minocycline. Although we did not observe significant differences in outcome among patients treated with of TMP-SMX, minocycline, and fluoroquinolones, this lack of distinction likely was due to treatment selection bias and a lack of statistical power. The Fourth European Conference on Infections in Leukemia recommended combination therapy with TMP-SMX in seriously ill or neutropenic patients with S. maltophilia infection, however, further studies are warranted [34].

There are some limitations to this study. First, the present study was a single-center retrospective cohort study. As such, this work may have underestimated the incidence and mortality for S. maltophilia bacteremia, and may have misclassified the source of bacteremia. Second, the number of patients was limited due to the low incidence of S. maltophilia bacteremia, which could have led to underpowered analyses. Third, treatment selection bias may have influenced the apparent mortality rate. However, few studies on risk factors for mortality in S. maltophilia bacteremia following allo-HSCT have been reported. The present study is worth reporting because our results are expected to help clinicians employ easily available tests to identify patients who may harbor risk factors for mortality.

Conclusions

The incidence of S. maltophilia bacteremia was higher in allo-HSCT recipients than in patients not receiving allo-HSCT. Among allo-HSCT recipients with S. maltophilia bacteremia, low albumin and high CRP levels appear to be predictive of disease progression to pneumonia and poor prognosis. Clinicians should consider those possibilities, perform appropriate tests, and promptly initiate antimicrobial treatment.

Abbreviations

allo-HSCT: 

allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

ANC: 

absolute neutrophil count

auto-HSCT: 

autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

CLABSI: 

central line-associated blood stream infection

CRP: 

C-reactive protein

CVC: 

central venous catheters

GVHD: 

graft-vs.-host disease

HLA: 

human leukocyte antigen

IDSA: 

Infectious Diseases Society of America

S. matophilia : 

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

SSCG: 

surviving sepsis campaign guidelines

TGC: 

tigecycline

TMP-SMX: 

trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the nursing staff at Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, for their assistance in the collection of samples from the patients included in this study. The authors are also grateful to the staff of the Hematology Division, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, for their excellent patient care.

Funding

This study was supported in part by a grant for clinical cancer research from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan.

Availability of data and materials

The original datasets that support the findings of this study are not publicly available according to the decision of the Ethics Review Committee in our hospital. However, the datasets will be available from the corresponding author on condition that the request is reasonable and accepted by the Ethics Review Committee.

Authors’ contributions

KH and NS: conception, design, clinical assessments, acquisition and analysis of data, interpretation of results, and manuscript writing. SS and KO: conception, clinical assessments, acquisition of data, interpretation of results, and revision of the manuscript. TK, AN, YY, TT, SK, SK, MS, SY, SS, KY, KI, AI, YN, TH, HM, TK, ND, KK, and HS: clinical assessments, acquisition of data, interpretation of results, and revision of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Ethics Review Committee at the Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital approved this study. Informed consent is not required for this type of retrospective study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Hematology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
(2)
Department of Infection Prevention and Control, and Department of Clinical Laboratory, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

References

  1. Denton M, Kerr KG. Microbiological and clinical aspects of infection associated with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998;11:57–80.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Brooke JS. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: an emerging global opportunistic pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012;25:2–41.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Anazi KA, Al-Jasser AM. Infections caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Front Oncol. 2014;4:232.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Safdar A, Rolston KV. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: changing spectrum of a serious bacterial pathogen in patients with cancer. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45:1602–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Chaplow R, Palmer B, Heyderman R, Moppett J, Marks DI. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteraemia in 40 haematology patients: risk factors, therapy and outcome. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2010;45:1109–10.Google Scholar
  6. Demiraslan H, Sevim M, Pala Ç, Durmaz S, Berk V, Kaynar L, et al. Risk factors influencing mortality related to Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection in hematology-oncology patients. Int J Hematol. 2013;97:414–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Tada K, Kurosawa S, Hiramoto N, Okinaka K, Ueno N, Asakura Y, et al. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection in hematopoietic SCT recipients: high mortality due to pulmonary hemorrhage. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:74–9.Google Scholar
  8. Araoka H, Fujii T, Izutsu K, Kimura M, Nishida A, Ishiwata K, et al. Rapidly progressive fatal hemorrhagic pneumonia caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in hematologic malignancy. Transpl Infect Dis. 2012;14:355–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Shiratori S, Wakasa K, Okada K, Sugita J, Akizawa K, Shigematsu A, et al. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection during allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a single-center experience. Clin Transpl. 2014;28:656–61.Google Scholar
  10. Yeshurun M, Grafter-Gvili A, Thaler M, Keller N, Nagler A, Shimoni A. Clinical characteristics of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients: a single center experience. Infection. 2010;38:211–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cho SY, Lee DG, Choi SM, Park C, Chun HS, Park YJ, et al. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bloodstream infection in patients with hematologic malignancies: a retrospective study and in vitro activities of antimicrobial combinations. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15:69.Google Scholar
  12. Wu PS, Lu CY, Chang LY, Hsueh PR, Lee PI, Chen JM, et al. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia in pediatric patients -- a 10-year analysis. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2006;39:144–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Micozzi A, Venditti M, Monaco M, Friedrich A, Taglietti F, Santilli S, et al. Bacteremia due to Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in patients with hematologic malignancies. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;31:705–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Raad I, Hanna HA, Alakech B, Chatzinikolaou I, Johnson MM, Tarrand J, et al. Differential time to positivity: a useful method for diagnosing catheter-related bloodstream infections. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140:18–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Araoka H, Baba M, Yoneyama A. Risk factors for mortality among patients with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia in Tokyo, Japan, 1996-2009. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010;29:605–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Reimer LG, Wilson ML, Weinstein MP. Update on detection of bacteremia and fungemia. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997;10:444–65.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Paez JI, Tengan FM, Barone AA, Levin AS, Costa SF. Factors associated with mortality in patients with bloodstream infection and pneumonia due to Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008;27:901–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:165–228.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Giralt S, Ballen K, Rizzo D, Bacigalupo A, Horowitz M, Pasquini M, et al. Reduced-intensity conditioning regimen workshop: defining the dose spectrum. Report of a workshop convened by the center for international blood and marrow transplant research. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009;15:367–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Freifeld AG, Bow EJ, Sepkowitz KA, Boeckh MJ, Ito JI, Mullen CA, et al. Clinical practice guideline for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer: 2010 update by the infectious diseases society of america. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52:e56–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:452–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Rolston KV, Kontoyiannis DP, Yadegarynia D, Raad II. Nonfermentative gram-negative bacilli in cancer patients: increasing frequency of infection and antimicrobial susceptibility of clinical isolates to fluoroquinolones. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2005;51:215–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lai CH, Chi CY, Chen HP, Chen TL, Lai CJ, Fung CP, et al. Clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of patients with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2004;37:350–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gradel KO, Thomsen RW, Lundbye-Christensen S, Nielsen H, Schønheyder HC. Baseline C-reactive protein level as a predictor of mortality in bacteraemia patients: a population-based cohort study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17:627–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Ho KM, Lee KY, Dobb GJ, Webb SA. C-reactive protein concentration as a predictor of in-hospital mortality after ICU discharge: a prospective cohort study. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34:481–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee JH, Kim J, Kim K, Jo YH, Rhee J, Kim TY, et al. Albumin and C-reactive protein have prognostic significance in patients with community-acquired pneumonia. J Crit Care. 2011;26:287–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Yin M, Si L, Qin W, Li C, Zhang J, Yang H, et al. Predictive Value of Serum Albumin Level for the Prognosis of Severe Sepsis Without Exogenous Human Albumin Administration. J Intensive Care Med. 2016 Jan;1 [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  28. Artero A, Zaragoza R, Camarena JJ, Sancho S, González R, Nogueira JM. Prognostic factors of mortality in patients with community-acquired bloodstream infection with severe sepsis and septic shock. J Crit Care. 2010;25:276–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Ranzani OT, Zampieri FG, Forte DN, Azevedo LC, Park M. C-reactive protein/albumin ratio predicts 90-day mortality of septic patients. PLoS One. 2013;8:e59321.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Kim MH, Ahn JY, Song JE, Choi H, Ann HW, Kim JK, et al. The C-Reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio as an Independent Predictor of Mortality in Patients with Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock Treated with Early Goal-Directed Therapy. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0132109.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Mori M, Tsunemine H, Imada K, Ito K, Kodaka T, Takahashi T, et al. Life-threatening hemorrhagic pneumonia caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in the treatment of hematologic diseases. Ann Hematol. 2014;93:901–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Tekçe YT, Erbay A, Cabadak H, Sen S. Tigecycline as a therapeutic option in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections. J Chemother. 2012;24:150–4.Google Scholar
  33. Wang YL, Scipione MR, Dubrovskaya Y, et al. Monotherapy with fluoroquinolone or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:176–82.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Averbuch D, Cordonnier C, Livermore DM, Mikulska M, Orasch C, Viscoli C, et al. Targeted therapy against multi-resistant bacteria in leukemic and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: guidelines of the 4th European Conference on Infections in Leukemia (ECIL-4, 2011). Haematologica. 2013;98:1836–47.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P, Klingemann HG, Beatty P, Hows J, et al. 1994 Consensus Conference on Acute GVHD Grading. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1995;15:825–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement

BMC Infectious Diseases

ISSN: 1471-2334

Contact us