Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Modeling the impact of novel diagnostic tests on pediatric and extrapulmonary tuberculosis

  • 1, 2, 3Email author,
  • 4,
  • 2 and
  • 5
BMC Infectious Diseases201414:477

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-477

©  Denkinger et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

  • Received: 11 April 2014
  • Accepted: 13 August 2014
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) and most pediatric TB cannot be diagnosed using sputum-based assays. The epidemiological impact of different strategies to diagnose EPTB and pediatric TB is unclear.

Methods

We developed a dynamic epidemic model of TB in a hypothetical population with epidemiological characteristics similar to India. We evaluated the impact of four alternative diagnostic test platforms on adult EPTB and pediatric TB mortality over 10 years: (1) Nucleic acid amplification test optimized for diagnosis of EPTB (“NAAT-EPTB”); (2) NAAT optimized for pediatric TB (“NAAT-Peds”); (3) more deployable NAAT for sputum-based diagnosis of adult pulmonary TB (“point-of-care (POC) sputum NAAT”); and (4) more deployable NAAT capable of diagnosing all forms of TB using non-invasive, non-sputum specimens (“POC non-sputum NAAT”).

Results

NAAT-EPTB lowered adult EPTB mortality by a projected 7.6% (95% uncertainty range [UR]: 6.5-8.8%). NAAT-Peds lowered pediatric TB mortality by 6.8% (UR: 4.9-8.4%). POC sputum NAAT, though only able to diagnose pulmonary TB, reduced projected pediatric TB deaths by 13.3% (UR: 4.6-15.7%) and adult EPTB deaths by 8.4% (UR 2.0-9.3%) simply by averting transmission of disease. POC non-sputum NAAT had the greatest effect, lowering pediatric TB mortality by 34.7% (UR: 26.8-38.7), and adult EPTB mortality by 38.5% (UR: 30.7-41.2). The relative impact of a POC sputum NAAT (i.e., enhanced deployability) versus NAAT-EPTB (i.e., enhanced ability to specifically diagnose TB-NSP) on adult EPTB mortality depends most strongly on factors that influence transmission, with settings of higher transmission (e.g., higher per-person transmission rate, lower diagnostic rate) favoring POC sputum NAAT.

Conclusion

Although novel tests for pediatric TB and EPTB are likely to reduce TB mortality, major reductions in pediatric and EPTB incidence and mortality also require better diagnostic tests for adult pulmonary TB that reach a larger population.

Keywords

  • Tuberculosis
  • Diagnostics
  • Pediatrics
  • Extrapulmonary
  • Modeling

Background

Improved diagnostic tests are needed to reduce the tremendous burden of morbidity and mortality due to tuberculosis (TB), a disease that affects 8.6 million people and kills 1.3 million every year [1]. In 2010, Xpert MTB/RIF (“Xpert”), a high-sensitivity rapid molecular test, was released and soon thereafter endorsed by the World Health Organization (WHO) for the diagnosis of adult pulmonary TB [2–4].

While pulmonary TB accounts for the largest burden of disease and Xpert as well as most other TB diagnostics are designed to use sputum as a biological specimen, at least 20% of all adults (up to 30-40% in HIV patients) – and most children with TB – either cannot produce sufficient sputum (“sputum-scarce”), do not have sufficient bacilli in their sputum to be detected, or have extrapulmonary TB (EPTB) [5–8]. EPTB and pediatric TB result in significant morbidity and mortality dependent on the organs affected (e.g., central nervous system) and due to the difficulty in achieving a diagnosis [9, 10]. Therefore, further research on improving existing tests and developing novel tests for pediatric TB and EPTB is necessary.

The most recent WHO guideline recommends Xpert for use in children and individuals with certain subsets of EPTB [11, 12]. However, the evidence base for this recommendation is considered to be very low-quality, and the accuracy of Xpert in its current version is insufficient for subsets of EPTB (e.g. pleural TB and TB meningitis) [11, 12].

In developing novel tests for pediatric and EPTB, one approach could be an “optimized” Xpert or other nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) capable of detecting M. tuberculosis with higher sensitivity in specimens other than sputum (e.g. tissue) for example through improved sample processing and DNA extraction. Another approach targeting the diagnosis of pulmonary TB in children and others who cannot produce good sputum, might be an improved non-sputum based assay (possibly optimized Xpert or other NAAT) using more easily accessible specimens (e.g. nasopharyngeal samples) [11, 13].

A third approach to improving the control of pediatric and EPTB is to develop more deployable tests for adult pulmonary TB, reasoning that children and immunocompromised individuals are at highest risk of developing active TB from recent transmission, and diagnosis and treatment strategies capable of reducing TB transmission in a community might have important indirect effects on pediatric and extrapulmonary TB [14]. The ideal assay, however, would be a test with improved diagnosis for pulmonary TB, “sputum scarce” TB, and EPTB in adults and children alike using clinical specimens other than sputum (e.g., blood or urine) on a deployable (able to be rolled out at microscopy center level) and sensitive platform linked to rapid treatment initiation [15].

To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of such different diagnostic approaches for EPTB and pediatric TB and evaluate them against a current baseline scenario with smear microscopy and alternatively with Xpert for adult pulmonary TB at the district level health care, we constructed a dynamic epidemic model of TB in a generalizable population, estimating ten-year EPTB and childhood TB incidence and mortality if four hypothetical but emblematic tests for EPTB and pediatric TB could be implemented.

Methods

Model structure

We built a compartmental model using ordinary differential equations to describe a mature tuberculosis epidemic in a stable, homogeneously mixing population structured by age and HIV status. Figure 1 describes the basic structure of the model; a more detailed description is found in the supplement. Given that the hypothetical assays we evaluate should have impact across the epidemiological contexts of greatest TB burden, we modeled a paradigmatic population with an incidence of drug-susceptible (181/100,000 per year) and drug-resistant TB (2.1% MDR among new cases) and an HIV prevalence similar to that of India (0.3%) [16]. We used data from World Health Organization (WHO) notifications and other published literature to inform parameters in our model (Table 1) [17, 18]. In order to optimize the benefit of tests for pediatric TB relative to those for adult pulmonary TB, we made liberal assumptions about the percentage of TB that occurs in children (taking into account the likely substantial underreporting of pediatric TB) [19–29].
Figure 1
Figure 1

Study flow diagram. Dashed boxes contain subjects that are infectious. The compartments are also defined by the individual’s age, HIV status, the type of tuberculosis (TB – pulmonary or extrapulmonary) and by the TB drug susceptibility pattern (sensitive, isoniazid [INH]-monoresistant, multidrug-resistant [MDR], and extensively-drug resistant [XDR]); these delineations are not shown in the diagram for simplicity.

Table 1

Parameters

Definition

HIV status

Value

Range

References

Non-TB death rate per year

all

0.022

0.02-0.025

 

TB mortality per year

HIV negative

0.15

0.1-0.22

[1, 19]

 

HIV positive

0.50

0.4-0.7

[20]

Transmission events per infectious person-year in year 10*

all

8.95

  

Partial immunity afforded by previous infection

HIV negative

0.45

0.4-0.55

[21, 22]

 

HIV positive

0

0-0.2

 

Proportion of TB infections progressing rapidly to active TB

HIV negative

0.14

0.05-0.14

[23]

 

HIV positive

0.25

0.16-0.27

 

Endogenous reactivation rate per year

HIV negative

0.0005

0.08-1.4 x10−3

[24]

 

HIV positive

0.05

0.03–0.05

Rate of self-cure in active TB per year

HIV negative

0.1

0.08-0.28

[25]

 

HIV positive

0

0-0.2

 

Percent of patients without access to diagnostics

all

0.1

0.05-0.25

[26]

Sensitivity of current diagnostic standard for PTB

all

0.80

0.6-0.9

[18, 33]

Sensitivity of current diagnostic standard for EPTB

all

0.6

0.4-0.8

 

Sensitivity of novel test methods for PTB

all

0.95

0.75-0.98

[27–29]

Proportion of adults that develop EPTB or sputum scarce PTB in

HIV negative

0.18

0.15-0.25

[31, 32]

 

HIV positive

0.35

0.3-0.7

 

Proportion of children that develop EPTB or sputum scarce PTB independent of HIV status (weighted average among different age groups)

all

0.85

0.6-0.9

[5]

Abbreviations: TB tuberculosis, NAAT nucleic-acid amplification test, EPTB extrapulmonary TB. *averaged over all patients with pulmonary TB (HIV-positive patients are estimated to be about half as infectious as HIV-negative patients).

Our primary modeling aim was to assess the maximum potential impact of a test that has enhanced capacity to diagnose clinical manifestations of TB that are not readily diagnosable with sputum-based tests. Our primary outcomes were the projected incidence and mortality due to TB overall, pediatric TB, and adult EPTB.

Pediatric and extrapulmonary TB are heterogeneous entities, including clinical sites as diverse as lymph nodes, bone, and the central nervous system, each with different degrees of severity and ability to be diagnosed by currently available means. As no model can fully account for such clinical diversity, we represent these heterogeneous manifestations as a single entity, labeled “TB with no sputum production” (TB-NSP), that reflects a weighted average of all TB clinical manifestations that are not readily diagnosable by sputum-based assays. We presume that the proportion of active TB consisting of TB-NSP is 85% in children (age 0–15) [6, 30], of which about 70% is in fact pulmonary TB (with and without extrapulmonary components) that cannot be diagnosed because a diagnostic sputum sample cannot be obtained, and the remaining 30% is EPTB. In the adult population, we assume TB-NSP constitutes about 18% in HIV-uninfected adults and 35% in HIV-infected adults (Table 1) [6, 31, 32].

Model calibration

We first established a baseline “year zero”, modeled as a scenario representative of the current TB epidemic in India [18]. We initiated the model at steady state 65 years prior to year zero (e.g., 1950, if year zero corresponds to 2015), calibrating the TB transmission rate (number of secondary infections per smear-positive person-year) to match India’s WHO-estimated TB incidence (181 per 100,000/year in 2011) [18]. To provide a realistic epidemic trajectory, we reduced the overall TB transmission rate to a degree sufficient to generate a 2% per year decline in TB incidence, the globally estimated average, five years before introducing the diagnostic interventions [18].

Diagnostic algorithms

At baseline, we assumed a “standard” diagnostic approach for individuals suspected of having adult pulmonary TB; this approach may consist of sputum examinations, ancillary diagnostic tests (e.g. chest X-ray, antibiotic trials), and clinical judgment [33]. We calibrated the sensitivity of this “standard approach” to a value (i.e. 80%) that provided a reasonable estimate of TB case detection rate (model value 70 = Indian national estimate for smear-positive cases) [17]. Diagnosis through this standard approach is assumed to occur at a given constant rate; in calculating this rate, we assumed that the delay in diagnosing TB-NSP would be twice that for adult pulmonary TB because of the difficulty in obtaining a sample from the site of infection (e.g. pleural aspirate or gastric fluid) for diagnosis [34].

In our analytic scenarios, we then enhanced this baseline diagnostic algorithm with platforms designed to improve diagnosis of TB-NSP through different combinations of (a) optimized detection of TB using clinical specimens other than sputum and/or (b) enhanced deployability of the assay itself:

Xpert MTB/RIF for adult pulmonary TB

Starting in year zero, we augmented the “standard” diagnostic approach with Xpert for adult pulmonary TB for adult pulmonary TB. We assumed that Xpert would increase the overall sensitivity of the standard approach for the diagnosis of adult pulmonary TB – incorporating all existing diagnostic tests, plus clinical judgment – from 80% to 95% (i.e., detecting 75% of TB cases who would otherwise be missed with 98% specificity) [33, 35]. We assumed that given Xpert’s current infrastructure requirements (e.g., constant power supply), it would be implemented in district level health centers and therefore would reach 15%, 30% and 30% of new, previously treated, and failure cases respectively (i.e. deployability limited to district level health centers). The remainder of cases continued to be diagnosed with the standard approach.

Optimized diagnostic approaches

We compared the impact of Xpert for adult pulmonary TB to that of four hypothetical tests that were designed to illustrate important test characteristics (e.g., components of a “target product profile”) and tradeoffs between deployability and ability to diagnose TB-NSP (and may or may not involve an Xpert like algorithm). We use the term “deployability” to denote the level of the healthcare system at which a diagnostic test can be implemented, and thus the proportion of the healthcare-seeking population that could reasonably be tested – assuming that tests implemented at more peripheral levels (e.g., microscopy centers) could reach a wider population than those implemented only in centralized laboratories. To maintain generalizability, we did not attempt to model any specific test currently in development. The four hypothetical tests were:
  1. (1).

    “NAAT Peds” – same accuracy (i.e. 95% sensitivity and 98% specificity), deployability and ability to diagnose adult pulmonary TB as Xpert but capable of diagnosing, in addition, 70% of all forms of TB-NSP with a respiratory component in children (e.g., using nasopharyngeal fluid but not able to diagnose, for example, TB meningitis);

     
  2. (2).

    “NAAT-EPTB” – deployability equal to Xpert (owing to the need for obtaining invasive specimens such as cerebrospinal fluid or gastric fluid) but capable of diagnosing both TB-NSP and pulmonary TB with the same accuracy as Xpert (i.e. 95% sensitivity and 98% specificity), through use of non-respiratory samples;

     
  3. (3).

    “POC sputum NAAT” – same sensitivity and specificity as Xpert for adult pulmonary TB, only more portable and less dependent on existing infrastructure (i.e. deployable at microscopy center level); modeled as reaching 50%, 80%, and 100% of new, previously treated, and failure cases respectively;

     
  4. (4)

    “POC non-sputum NAAT” – similar to POC sputum NAAT (same sensitivity and specificity as Xpert) but using a more accessible clinical specimen (e.g., urine or finger-prick blood) and thus capable of diagnosing both pulmonary TB and TB-NSP, with the same speed for both as it does not require an invasive sample but without rifampin resistance detection [14, 15].

     

Sensitivity analysis

We conducted one-way sensitivity analyses on all model parameters taking as the outcome the difference in adult EPTB mortality comparing NAAT-EPTB (improved detection of TB-NSP through access of non-pulmonary sites) to POC sputum NAAT (improved detection through higher deployability of a sputum-based test). The ranges of the parameters are based on the available literature and possible advances in the near future, as outlined in Additional file 1: Table S1. To estimate variability associated with simultaneous changes in all parameters, we also conducted a probabilistic uncertainty analysis using Latin Hypercube Sampling (Additional files 1 and 2 detail in the supplement).

Results

Impact on TB incidence

In the absence of any improvement in TB diagnosis, we projected, in year ten, 44.8 TB cases and 9.4 deaths per 100,000 in children and 89.5 cases and 22.8 deaths in adults (Table 2). If Xpert for adult pulmonary TB was scaled up in year zero for 15% of new and 30% of previously treated cases, TB incidence fell from this baseline by 5.0% in children (95% uncertainty range [UR]: 1.6-6.1%) and 4.0% in adults (UR 1.0-4.5%). Implementation of Xpert for adult pulmonary TB after 10 years did not change the proportion of TB that was TB-NSP (30% in adults, 78% in children).
Table 2

Projected tuberculosis outcomes

 

10-year projected tuberculosis outcomes

 

Incidence per 100,000

Prevalence per 100,000

Mortality per 100,000

 

Adult total

Adult EPTB

Children

Adult total

Adult EPTB

Children

Adult total

Adult EPTB

Children

 

N (% reduction*)

N (% reduction*)

N (% reduction*)

N (% reduction*)

N (% reduction)

N (% reduction*)

N (% reduction*)

N (% reduction*)

N (% reduction*)

Existing standard

89.5 (Ref)

13.9 (Ref)

44.8 (Ref)

114.8 (Ref)

34.4 (Ref)

62.8 (Ref)

22.8 (Ref)

7.3 (Ref)

9.4 (Ref)

Xpert for adult pulmonary TB

86.0 (4.0%)

13.4 (3.7%)

42.6 (5.0%)

109.3 (4.8%)

33.2 (3.5%)

59.8 (4.9%)

21.8 (4.5%)

7.1 (3.0%)

8.9 (4.8%)

NAAT- Peds

86.0 (4.0%)

13.4 (3.7%)

42.6 (5.0%)

109.2 (4.9%)

33.1 (3.9%)

58.5 (6.9%)

21.8 (4.5%)

7.1 (3.3%)

8.7 (6.8%)

NAAT- EPTB

86.0 (4.0%)

13.4 (3.7%)

42.6 (5.0%)

107.8 (6.1%)

31.7 (7.9%)

58.0 (7.7%)

21.4 (5.9%)

6.7 (7.6%)

8.7 (7.6%)

POC NAAT sputum

79.6 (11.1%)

12.5 (10.2%)

38.6 (13.8%)

99.8 (13.0%)

31.0 (9.8%)

54.4 (13.4%)

20.0 (12.2%)

6.7 (8.4%)

8.1 (13.3%)

POC NAAT non- sputum

80.2 (10.4%)

12.6 (9.6%)

39.0 (13.0%)

90.5 (21.2%)

21.1 (38.8%)

41.0 (34.7%)

18.0 (21.3%)

4.5 (38.5%)

6.1 (34.7%)

Abbreviations: POC point of care, NAAT nucleic-acid amplification test, EPTB extrapulmonary TB. *compared to existing standard = Ref. Incidence, prevalence and mortality for children and adults by year ten with different interventions.

Replacement of Xpert for adult pulmonary TB with POC sputum NAAT (i.e., a more deployable but equally accurate sputum-based test) resulted in more TB being diagnosed and treated, thus reducing pediatric TB incidence by 13.8% (UR 4.6-16.3%) and adult TB incidence by 11.1% (UR 2.7-11.9%). A similar test on non-sputum-based samples that could not detect rifampin resistance (i.e., POC non-sputum NAAT) had nearly similar impact on incidence: 13.0% (UR 4.0-15.5%, from 44.8 to 39.0 cases per 100,000/year) reduction in children and 10.4% (UR 2.3-11.4%; from 89.5 to 80.2 cases per 100,000/year) in adults (Figure 2A, Table 2). In contrast, NAAT-EPTB and NAAT-Peds did not reduce TB incidence beyond the effect of Xpert for adult pulmonary TB alone (Table 2), reflecting model assumptions that EPTB is not infectious and TB in children is substantially less infectious than pulmonary TB in adults. NAAT-EPTB also had only a small incremental effect on adult TB-NSP prevalence over Xpert alone (4.5% reduction).
Figure 2
Figure 2

Impact of different tests on pulmonary and extrapulmonary TB (A) incidence and (B) mortality in adults and children. Trajectory of (A) overall tuberculosis (TB) incidence and (B) mortality over 10 years without further intervention (maroon line), with introduction of Xpert for adult pulmonary TB (green line; coverage 15%, 30%, 30% among new, previously treated and failure cases) and introduction of POC sputum NAAT (purple line; coverage of 50%, 80%, 100%). In addition, we project the incremental impact of POC-non-sputum NAAT that was optimized for detection of both pulmonary TB and extrapulmonary TB (EPTB) (orange line) using non-invasive samples thus eliminating a delay in diagnosis of EPTB and being deployed at the same level of coverage as POC sputum NAAT.

Impact on TB mortality

After 10 years, Xpert for adult pulmonary TB reduced deaths by a projected 4.8% in children (UR 1.6-5.9%) and 4.5% in adults (UR 1.6-5.6%) (Figure 2B, Table 2), closely mirroring reductions in incidence. All diagnostic tests for TB-NSP had substantially greater impact on TB mortality than on incidence. The addition of detection of TB-NSP in children with NAAT-Peds and in adults with NAAT-EPTB enhanced mortality reductions to 6.8% (UR 4.9-8.4%) in children and 5.9% (UR 3.9-7.3%) in adults, respectively.NAAT-EPTB and POC sputum NAAT achieved similar reductions in adult EPTB mortality after 10 years (7.6% [UR 6.5-8.8%] and 8.4% [UR 2.0-9.3%], respectively), but through different mechanisms: NAAT-EPTB resulted directly in better treatment of adult EPTB, whereas POC sputum NAAT reduced TB transmission and thus the number of future cases of adult EPTB. Since its mechanism was more direct, NAAT-EPTB achieved its effect on mortality more rapidly (Figure 3A). However, since the majority of TB is adult pulmonary TB, POC sputum NAAT had a much greater effect on overall adult TB mortality (12.2% reduction [UR 4.5-14.8%] compared to 5.9% [UR 3.9-7.3%] with NAAT-EPTB). Similar to the NAAT-EPTB for adult EPTB mortality, the NAAT-Peds outperformed POC sputum NAAT in early years, but POC sputum NAAT led to greater reductions in TB mortality – and even pediatric-specific TB mortality – over time: 13.3% [UR 4.6-15.7%] versus 6.8% [UR 4.9-8.4%] at ten years (Figure 3B).
Figure 3
Figure 3

Impact of different tests on mortality in (A) adult extrapulmonary and (B) pediatric tuberculosis. Trajectory of extrapulmonary tuberculosis (TB) mortality in adults (A) and overall TB mortality in children (B) over 10 years without further intervention (maroon line), with introduction of Xpert for adult pulmonary TB (green line; coverage 15%, 30%, 30% among new, previously treated and failure cases), POC sputum NAAT (purple line; coverage of 50%, 80%, 100%), NAAT-EPTB (black line in A) and NAAT-Peds (black line in B; the latter two both at the same coverage as Xpert). In addition, we project the incremental impact of POC-non-sputum NAAT (orange line).

POC non-sputum NAAT had the greatest impact on TB mortality, reducing pediatric TB mortality by 34.7% (UR 26.8-38.7%; from 9.4 to 6.1 deaths per 100,000/year) and adult EPTB mortality by 38.5% (UR 30.7-41.2; from 7.3 to 4.5 deaths per 100,000/year).

Sensitivity analysis

We focused our primary sensitivity analysis around the comparison of POC sputum NAAT (i.e., enhanced deployability) versus NAAT-EPTB (i.e., enhanced ability to specifically diagnose TB-NSP). The relative impact of these two tests on adult EPTB mortality depends most strongly on factors that influence transmission, with settings of higher transmission (e.g., higher per-person transmission rate, lower diagnostic rate) favoring POC sputum NAAT (Figure 4). Since the sensitivity of the existing diagnostic standard is much higher for adult pulmonary TB than for TB-NSP, the impact of POC sputum NAAT depends more strongly on the sensitivity of the existing standard than does NAAT-EPTB. No one-way parameter variation across the ranges in Additional file 1: Table S1 changed the absolute difference in mortality by more than 1.2 cases per 100,000 per year. Further sensitivity analyses, including a 3-way sensitivity analysis on the sensitivity of the existing standard for PTB, the incremental sensitivity of the novel test and the diagnostic rate, are reported in the supplement.
Figure 4
Figure 4

Sensitivity analysis. Absolute difference in extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) mortality in adults per 100,000 by year 10 if POC sputum NAAT is compared to NAAT-EPTB varying one parameter at the time. Numbers in parentheses indicate parameter values at base case and the range from lower and upper end over which the respective parameter is varied (while other parameters are kept constant). The analysis shows that effect of POC sputum NAAT is primarily dependent on reducing transmission of adult pulmonary TB (PTB) and the sensitivity of the test for existing standard for PTB in conjunction with the rate at which the test is used.

Discussion

This transmission model of a TB epidemic in a defined population suggests that novel assays capable of diagnosing TB-NSP in addition to TB that is diagnosed through sputum examination may generate important (3-8%) reductions in adult EPTB and childhood TB mortality by ten years. However, greater impact on pediatric TB and EPTB mortality (10-15%) may be achievable by deploying tests capable of detecting adult pulmonary TB more widely (i.e., by reducing pediatric and extrapulmonary TB indirectly through reducing transmission). Nevertheless, dramatic reductions in incidence and mortality are unlikely unless a novel test can be developed that cannot only detect TB-NSP but do so using a deployable platform on clinical specimens other than sputum (e.g., hypothetical urine or finger-prick blood assay).

The indirect effect of a more deployable Xpert-like sputum test on pediatric TB (i.e. POC sputum NAAT) on children is particularly noteworthy. TB in children is acquired predominantly from adults and very young children have a greater risk for progression to active disease [36]. Thus, infection and disease in young children are a measure of TB transmission, and tests (e.g., POC sputum NAAT) that add no direct benefit to the diagnosis of TB in these children may counter intuitively still have their greatest effect among such young children, in whom nearly all active TB results from recent transmission [37]. Comprehensive control strategies for pediatric TB should therefore consider that control of pediatric TB requires better tools for diagnosis of the adult pulmonary manifestations responsible for most transmission. Nevertheless, reductions in pediatric TB incidence through reduced transmission are unlikely to be immediate; as such, a specific test for pediatric TB – which can save lives more immediately, and more directly – remains a high priority. An optimized diagnostic and preventive strategy for pediatric TB would include a more sensitive test for pediatric forms of TB plus a more deployable test for adult pulmonary TB that could both reduce the infectious duration and hasten contact investigations in which pediatric contacts of adult TB cases could be given preventive therapy. Our model uses hypothetical tests, however, efforts are ongoing to optimize Xpert for extrapulmonary specimens, develop an automated NAAT that can be deployed at the microscopy center level and identify biomarkers in urine, blood, breath or other more easily accessible samples to make a POC non-sputum test a reality [12, 38, 39].

Prior models of Xpert for adult pulmonary TB have projected a larger impact, specifically on mortality [40]. Our model differs from those models in that we conceptualize a “diagnostic attempt” not simply as the combined sensitivity of a series of tests, but rather as a clinical decision-making process that incorporates ancillary data (e.g., change in symptoms over time) and therefore often occurs on a slower time scale, but with increased overall sensitivity. This higher sensitivity – including clinical or empiric diagnosis – appears to reflect diagnostic reality, at least in settings with trained clinicians and some ancillary testing (e.g., chest X-ray) available [33]. As we incorporate clinical/empiric diagnosis of TB, adding a single diagnostic test to the overall diagnostic pathway results in a lower incremental benefit (and as shown in the supplement a lower cost-effectiveness).

Our model, as with any mathematical representation, has certain limitations. In order to increase transparency and generalizability, the model uses a hypothetical population and is only calibrated to key input parameters reflective of the current TB epidemiology in a population representative of India. This model, therefore, does not account for the complexity of the epidemiological scenario in India or any other single specific location [17, 18, 41, 42]. The model structure also cannot fully capture the heterogeneity of TB epidemics (for example, those driven primarily by HIV) and the complexity of a diagnostic ecosystem with a large, poorly functioning private sector alongside the public sector as present in India [42–44]. Furthermore, the amount of overtreatment in children is also considered to be sizeable but poorly defined. A more accurate test could curb overtreatment and result in more appropriate diagnosis and treatment, potentially improving effectiveness beyond that estimated here. By excluding the potential benefit of limiting overtreatment, we may underestimate the effectiveness of testing in children in these settings.

Conclusions

In conclusion, diagnostic tests for pediatric TB and EPTB remain a key research priority, as they are likely to have substantial additive impact on mortality over current diagnostic tests that perform insufficiently. These tests are expected to have large market potential. Nevertheless, in the long run, the most effective way to reduce mortality from TB-NSP (and especially pediatric TB, which is highly correlated with recent TB transmission) may be to deploy diagnostic tests and other strategies capable of reducing TB incidence as a whole. One such mechanism is to prioritize tests that can be run on accessible clinical specimens (e.g., blood, urine) and systems to link individuals who test positive directly to treatment. New diagnostic tests are an essential component in reducing the tremendous burden of pediatric and extrapulmonary TB, but elimination of this burden will require a combined approach that also emphasizes reduction in TB transmission and rapid linkage to care.

Declarations

Funding

Development and publication of this manuscript was made possible with financial support from the New Diagnostics Working Group of the Stop TB Partnership, grants from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1061487), the Canadian Institute of Health Research (MOP 123291), the UK Medical Research Council (MR/K011944/1) as well as the US National Institutes of Health (1R21AI101152). CMD is supported by a Richard Tomlinson Fellowship at McGill University and a fellowship of the Burroughs–Wellcome Fund from the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, USA
(2)
McGill University, Montreal, Canada
(3)
Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Geneva, Switzerland
(4)
Imperial College, London, UK
(5)
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA

References

  1. World Health Organization: Global Tuberculosis Control: WHO Report 2013. 2013, Geneva: WHO, 1-306. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/91355/1/9789241564656_eng.pdf?ua=1,Google Scholar
  2. World Health Organization: Automated real-time nucleic acid amplification technology for rapid and simultaneous detection of tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance: Xpert MTB/RIF system. 2011, Geneva, http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2011/9789241501545_eng.pdf,Google Scholar
  3. World Health Organization: WHO Monitoring of Xpert MTB/RIF Roll-Out. http://who.int/tb/laboratory/mtbrifrollout/en/,
  4. World Health Organization: Rapid Implementation of the Xpert MTB/RIF Diagnostic Test: Technical and Operational, How-to; Practical Considerations. 2011, Geneva, http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2011/9789241501569_eng.pdf,Google Scholar
  5. Harries AD, Hargreaves NJ, Graham SM, Mwansambo C, Kazembe P, Broadhead RL, Maher D, Salaniponi FM: Childhood tuberculosis in Malawi: nationwide case-finding and treatment outcomes. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2002, 6 (5): 424-431.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Zar HJ, Hanslo D, Apolles P, Swingler G, Hussey G: Induced sputum versus gastric lavage for microbiological confirmation of pulmonary tuberculosis in infants and young children: a prospective study. Lancet. 2005, 365 (9454): 130-134. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17702-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Peter JG, Cashmore TJ, Meldau R, Theron G, van Zyl-Smit R, Dheda K: Diagnostic accuracy of induced sputum LAM ELISA for tuberculosis diagnosis in sputum-scarce patients. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2012, 16 (8): 1108-1112. 10.5588/ijtld.11.0614.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Jones BE, Young SM, Antoniskis D, Davidson PT, Kramer F, Barnes PF: Relationship of the manifestations of tuberculosis to CD4 cell counts in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993, 148 (5): 1292-1297. 10.1164/ajrccm/148.5.1292.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Rossato Silva D, Muller AM, Dalcin Pde T: Factors associated with delayed diagnosis of tuberculosis in hospitalized patients in a high TB and HIV burden setting: a cross-sectional study. BMC Infect Dis. 2012, 12: 57-10.1186/1471-2334-12-57.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. World health Organization: Improving the Diagnosis and Treatment of Smear-Negative Pulmonary and Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis among Adults and Adolescents. 2007, http://www.who.int/tb/publications/2006/tbhiv_recommendations.pdf,Google Scholar
  11. World Health Organization: Automated Real-Time Nucleic Acid Amplification Technology for Rapid and Simultaneous Detection of Tuberculosis and Rifampicin resistance: Xpert MTB/RIF System for the Diagnosis of Pulmonary and Extrapulmonary TB in Adults and Children. 2013, http://www.stoptb.org/wg/gli/assets/documents/9789241506335_eng.pdf,Google Scholar
  12. Denkinger CM, Schumacher SG, Boehme CC, Dendukuri N, Pai M, Steingart KR: Xpert MTB/RIF assay for the diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir J. 2014, 44 (2): 435-446. 10.1183/09031936.00007814.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Zar HJ, Workman L, Isaacs W, Munro J, Black F, Eley B, Allen V, Boehme CC, Zemanay W, Nicol MP: Rapid molecular diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in children using nasopharyngeal specimens. Clin Infect Dis. 2012, 55 (8): 1088-1095. 10.1093/cid/cis598.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Niemz A, Boyle DS: Nucleic acid testing for tuberculosis at the point-of-care in high-burden countries. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2012, 12 (7): 687-701. 10.1586/erm.12.71.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Gates Foundation Invests in Cutting-Edge Research to Diagnose Tuberculosis in Developing Countries | Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. http://www.gatesfoundation.org/media-center/press-releases/2012/02/gates-foundation-invests-in-cuttingedge-research-to-diagnose-tuberculosis-in-developing-countries,
  16. Anderson RM, May RM: Infectious Diseases of Humans: Dynamics and Control. 1991, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  17. Performance Data on Tuberculosis Control. http://www.tbcindia.nic.in/perfor.html,
  18. Geneva, World Health Organization: Global Tuberculosis Report 2012. 2012, Geneva, 1-282.Google Scholar
  19. Corbett EL, Charalambous S, Moloi VM, Fielding K, Grant AD, Dye C, De Cock KM, Hayes RJ, Williams BG, Churchyard GJ: Human immunodeficiency virus and the prevalence of undiagnosed tuberculosis in African gold miners. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004, 170 (6): 673-679. 10.1164/rccm.200405-590OC.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Styblo K: Epidemiology of tuberculosis. The Hague. 1991, The Netherlands: Royal Netherlands Tuberculosis Association (KNCV)Google Scholar
  21. Sutherland I, Svandova E, Radhakrishna S: The development of clinical tuberculosis following infection with tubercle bacilli. 1. A theoretical model for the development of clinical tuberculosis following infection, linking from data on the risk of tuberculous infection and the incidence of clinical tuberculosis in the Netherlands. Tubercle. 1982, 63 (4): 255-268. 10.1016/S0041-3879(82)80013-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Andrews JR, Noubary F, Walensky RP, Cerda R, Losina E, Horsburgh CR: Risk of progression to active tuberculosis following reinfection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2012, 54 (6): 784-791. 10.1093/cid/cir951.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Vynnycky E, Fine PE: The natural history of tuberculosis: the implications of age-dependent risks of disease and the role of reinfection. Epidemiol Infect. 1997, 119 (2): 183-201. 10.1017/S0950268897007917.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Antonucci G, Girardi E, Armignacco O, Salmaso S, Ippolito G: Tuberculosis in HIV-infected subjects in Italy: a multicentre study. The Gruppo Italiano di Studio Tubercolosi e AIDS. AIDS. 1992, 6 (9): 1007-1013. 10.1097/00002030-199209000-00015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Dye C, Garnett GP, Sleeman K, Williams BG: Prospects for worldwide tuberculosis control under the WHO DOTS strategy. Directly observed short-course therapy. Lancet. 1998, 352 (9144): 1886-1891. 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)03199-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Etard JF, Ndiaye I, Thierry-Mieg M, Gueye NF, Gueye PM, Laniece I, Dieng AB, Diouf A, Laurent C, Mboup S, Sow PS, Delaporte E, ANRS 1290 Study Group: Mortality and causes of death in adults receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy in Senegal: a 7-year cohort study. AIDS. 2006, 20 (8): 1181-1189. 10.1097/01.aids.0000226959.87471.01.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Steingart KR, Sohn H, Schiller I, Kloda LA, Boehme CC, Pai M, Dendukuri N: Xpert (R) MTB/RIF assay for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013, 1: CD009593Google Scholar
  28. Moure R, Martin R, Alcaide F: Effectiveness of an integrated real-time PCR method for detection of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in smear-negative extrapulmonary samples in an area of low tuberculosis prevalence. J Clin Microbiol. 2012, 50 (2): 513-515. 10.1128/JCM.06467-11.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Tortoli E, Russo C, Piersimoni C, Mazzola E, Dal Monte P, Pascarella M, Borroni E, Mondo A, Piana F, Scarparo C, Coltella L, Lombardi G, Cirillo DM: Clinical validation of Xpert MTB/RIF for the diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Eur Respir J. 2012, 40 (2): 442-447. 10.1183/09031936.00176311.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Newton SM, Brent AJ, Anderson S, Whittaker E, Kampmann B: Paediatric tuberculosis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2008, 8 (8): 498-510. 10.1016/S1473-3099(08)70182-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Chaisson RE, Schecter GF, Theuer CP, Rutherford GW, Echenberg DF, Hopewell PC: Tuberculosis in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Clinical features, response to therapy, and survival. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1987, 136 (3): 570-574. 10.1164/ajrccm/136.3.570.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Peter JG, Theron G, Singh N, Singh A, Dheda K: Sputum induction to aid diagnosis of smear-negative or sputum-scarce tuberculosis in adults in HIV-endemic settings. Eur Respir J. 2014, 43 (1): 185-194. 10.1183/09031936.00198012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Theron G, Zijenah L, Chanda D, Clowes P, Rachow A, Lesosky M, Bara W, Mungofa S, Pai M, Hoelscher M, Dowdy D, Pym A, Mwaba P, Mason P, Peter J, Dheda K, TB-NEAT team: Feasibility, accuracy, and clinical effect of point-of-care Xpert MTB/RIF testing for tuberculosis in primary-care settings in Africa: a multicentre, randomized, controlled trial. Lancet. 2014, 383 (9915): 424-435. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62073-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Leutscher P, Madsen G, Erlandsen M, Veirum J, Ladefoged K, Thomsen V, Wejse C, Hilberg O: Demographic and clinical characteristics in relation to patient and health system delays in a tuberculosis low-incidence country. Scand J Infect Dis. 2012, 44 (1): 29-36. 10.3109/00365548.2011.608081.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Steingart KR, Schiller I, Horne DJ, Pai M, Boehme CC, Dendukuri N: Xpert (R) MTB/RIF assay for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014, 1: CD009593Google Scholar
  36. Marais BJ, Gie RP, Schaaf HS, Beyers N, Donald PR, Starke JR: Childhood pulmonary tuberculosis: old wisdom and new challenges. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006, 173 (10): 1078-1090. 10.1164/rccm.200511-1809SO.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Middelkoop K, Bekker LG, Morrow C, Zwane E, Wood R: Childhood tuberculosis infection and disease: a spatial and temporal transmission analysis in a South African township. S Afr Med J. 2009, 99 (10): 738-743.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Tuberculosis - Diagnostics Technology and Market Landscape. 2013, http://www.unitaid.eu/images/marketdynamics/publications/TB-Dx-Landscape_1-Jul-2013.pdf,
  39. World Health Organization: Xpert MTB/RIF implementation manual: technical and operational ‘how-to’; practical considerations. 2014, http://www.who.int/tb/laboratory/xpert_implem_manual/en/,Google Scholar
  40. Menzies NA, Cohen T, Lin HH, Murray M, Salomon JA: Population health impact and cost-effectiveness of tuberculosis diagnosis with Xpert MTB/RIF: a dynamic simulation and economic evaluation. PLoS Med. 2012, 9 (11): e1001347-10.1371/journal.pmed.1001347.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Bhargava A, Pinto L, Pai M: Mismanagement of tuberculosis in India: causes, consequences, and the way forward. Hypothesis. 2011, 9 (1): e7-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Vandan N, Ali M, Prasad R, Kuroiwa C: Assessment of doctors’ knowledge regarding tuberculosis management in Lucknow, India: a public-private sector comparison. Public Health. 2009, 123 (7): 484-489. 10.1016/j.puhe.2009.05.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Dowdy D, Vassall A, Cobelens F: Tuberculosis control in crisis: economic honesty and comparative effectiveness. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2012, 16 (8): 1131-1132. 10.5588/ijtld.12.0270.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. World Health Organization: Anti-Tuberculosis Drug Resistance in the World. The WHO/UNION Global Project on Anti-Tuberculosis Drug Resistance Surveillance. 2008, http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2008/WHO_HTM_TB_2008.394_eng.pdf,Google Scholar

    45. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/14/477/prepub

Copyright

© Denkinger et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement

BMC Infectious Diseases

ISSN: 1471-2334

Contact us