Skip to main content
Download PDF

Molecular diagnosis, phylogenetic analysis, and antifungal susceptibility profiles of Candida species isolated from neutropenic oncological patients

BMC Infectious Diseases volume 23, Article number: 765 (2023) Cite this article

A Correction to this article was published on 13 February 2024

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

Neutropenia is the most important cause of life-threatening invasive fungal infections (IFIs). Here, we studied the frequency and antifungal susceptibility profiles of Candida species that colonized or caused infections among neutropenic patients with solid or hematological malignancies.

Methods

A total of 362 clinical samples were collected from 138 patients. After initial isolation using a mix of mycological methods, isolates were screened using chromogenic culture media. Polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) was applied for molecular identification. Positive or suspected cases were confirmed using the reference method of sequencing. Antifungal susceptibility testing for voriconazole and caspofungin was carried out using the microbroth dilution method. An in-silico assay was applied for phylogenetic analysis.

Results

Thirty-four Candida strains were isolated. C. albicans (47.06%) and C. glabrata (29.41%) were the most frequent strains. Antifungal treatment reduced the chance of Candida colonization by almost 76% in neutropenic patients (OR: 1.759; 95% CI: 1.349 to 2.390; p value: 0.000). An unusual and non-resistant strain, C. lambica, was reported from the bloodstream of a 56-year-old man with hematologic malignancy (HM). Eight isolates were non-susceptible, and one isolate was resistant to voriconazole. Also, four isolates were non-susceptible to caspofungin.

Conclusion

We can conclude that there is a cause-and-effect relationship between neutropenia, HM background, and Candida species separated from neutropenic patients, which can lead to possible infections. Further and repetitive studies are recommended using different molecular methods for better prediction and management of fungal infections in neutropenic patients.

Peer Review reports

Background

Candidiasis is a vast spectrum of fungal infections caused by Candida yeast species [1,2,3,4]. Neutrophils are among the most prominent immune elements for host defense against invasive fungal infections (IFIs) [5]. Several studies evaluated the crucial roles played by neutrophils in defense against IFIs among immunosuppressed hosts [6, 7]. Reduced clearance by neutrophils could benefit commensal fitness and promote the virulence and pathogenicity of Candida species, leading to fungal positivity and infection [8, 9]. Neutropenia is the most important cause of life-threatening IFIs [5]. However, different species of bacteria also cause invasive infections in patients with prolonged neutropenia [10, 11]. Studies reported that the incidence of one of the main sorts of IFIs, nosocomial Candida bloodstream infections (BSIs), ranged from 0.21 episodes to 0.39 episodes per 1000 admissions among neutropenic patients [12, 13].

Clinical manifestations of IFIs among neutropenic patients are wide-spectrum and vary from simple dermatological [14] to life-threatening disseminated manifestations [15]. Due to the immunosuppressed status of the patients, the distinction between infection and colonization is very difficult [16]. IFIs require prompt diagnosis and therapy due to their life-threatening problems [17, 18]. This is complicated by the emergence of antifungal-resistant isolates, especially in Candida species [19, 20]. Therefore, it shouldn’t be neglected that, along with clinical signs and symptoms, microbiological and molecular diagnosis of the Candida species are imperative for the survival of the target population [21]. Prophylactic and empirical therapies with amphotericin B (AmB), azoles, and echinocandins are highly recommended management and control strategies [22, 23].

Here, we studied the distribution of Candida species among neutropenic patients with solid or hematological malignancies using molecular analysis and phylogenetic tools. Also, the antifungal susceptibility profiles of isolated strains were studied using the microbroth dilution method. This study was focused on the microbiological and epidemiological aspects of the topic.

Materials and methods

Patients

In our cross-sectional study, a total of 138 neutropenic patients who were hospitalized in a specialized oncology center (Shahid Ghazi Tabatabai Hospital) in Tabriz, Iran, were evaluated from December 2020 to February 2022. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (permission code: IR.TBZMED.REC.1399.1157). Written informed consent was obtained from patients. Moreover, medical records (malignancy type and stage, chemotherapy, and onco-radiotherapy) and demographic data (age and sex) of patients were captured and documented where available. Cancer patients with defined clinical characteristics for neutropenia [24] were included according to the oncologist recommendation. The differentiation between Candida positivity or negativity was first defined by the clinical signs and symptoms, such as fever, as previously described [25]. This study excluded patients with unclear pre-hospitalization, chronic fungal infection (prior to neutropenic treatment), unclear antifungal treatment (AFT) status, and unclear neutrophil count. The neutrophil count was carried out using the Sysmex KX-21 N (Sysmex Inc, Japan).

Samples & initial yeast isolation

Clinical specimens, including 169 swabs from the oral cavity, 78 blood samples, 109 urine samples, and six nail samples from patients, were collected. Samples were immediately cultured on Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) (Merck, Germany) containing antibiotics (chloramphenicol) and incubated at 32 °C for 72 h. Blood samples were inoculated into biphasic brain-heart infusion (BHI) (Baharafshan, Iran) bottles and incubated at 37 °C for two weeks. In addition, blood specimens were inoculated into blood culture bottles (BACTEC Myco/F Lytic culture vials) and processed using the automated blood culture system (BACTEC 9120) over a 5-day incubation period. The suspected or positive cultures were transferred to sterile normal saline tubes and then immediately sent to the referral laboratory of medical mycology at the School of Medicine in Tabriz.

Screening of Candida species

A loop of each tube’s content was cultured on SDA. For macro-morphologic screening of Candida species, the resulting single colonies were recultured linearly on chromogenic CHROMagar™ Candida plates (HiCrome ™, France) and incubated at 35 °C for 48 h. Also, a series of micro-morphologic tests, such as chlamydospore production on cornmeal agar (Micro Master, India) plus 1% Tween 80 (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) and germ tube formation on human serum, were carried out for further evaluation. Identified colonies were purified through several dilutions and successive passages on the SDA. Pure colonies were transferred to Eppendorf tubes containing sterile water and stored at -20 °C for molecular assays and antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST).

Molecular assays

DNA extraction & polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

The boiling method was applied for DNA extraction. A suspension of pure colonies was prepared in 200 µl of distilled water, boiled for 20 min in a water bath, centrifuged for 5 min at 5000 g, and the supernatant preserved at -20 °C until use [26]. The initial molecular identification was performed by PCR on the ITS1-5.8 S-ITS2 rDNA region via ITS1/ITS4 primer pairs (ITS1: 5′-TCC GTA GGT GAA CCT GCG G-3′; ITS4: 5′-TCC TCC GCT TAT TGA TAT GC-3′) (Sinaclon, Iran). The PCR amplification was done in 25 µl reaction volumes, including 1 µl of each forward and reverse primer, 12.5 µl of super PCR master mix (Yekta Tajhiz Azma, Iran), 3 µl of DNA template, and 7.5 µl of deionized distilled water. Reactions were performed in a thermal cycler PCR system (Peqlab, Germany). The PCR conditions were as follows: an initial cycle of 94 ºC for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94 ºC for 30 s, 56 ºC for 45 s, 72 ºC for 45 s, and a final extension of 72 ºC for 7 min. Finally, the quality of PCR products was evaluated using agarose gel electrophoresis with the Gel Doc XR system (Biorad, USA) and smart ladder (Yekta Tajhiz Azma, Iran). The positive and negative controls were 10 ng/µl of DNA from C. albicans ATCC 10,231 and sterile distilled water, respectively.

Sanger sequencing of PCR products

All positive PCR products were sent for sequencing of the amplified panfungal ITS1-5.8 S-ITS2 gene region (Codon genetics group, Iran). The results of Sanger sequencing were analyzed and edited via the Sequencher 4.7 and MEGA 5.05 softwares. The sequences were aligned using the Basic Local Alignment Tool Search (BLAST) to check their probable similarities with submitted fungal sequences on GeneBank.

Polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP)

PCR-RFLP was carried out according to the previously approved protocol introduced by Mirhendi et al. [27]. However, the restriction sites were predicted by CLC Sequence Viewer 7.6 software. The PCR products were digested by the 1 µl MspI (HpaII) enzyme (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and processed with 18 µl nuclease-free water and 2 µl 10X buffer tango [28]. Finally, Candida species were identified according to each electrophoretic band’s pattern and size.

Phylogenetic analysis

To authenticate the genetic associations and taxonomic status of identified Candida species, as inferred by the ITS1 and ITS4 regions, a phylogenetic tree was generated by MEGA 5.05 software based on the Maximum Likelihood algorithm and Kimura 2-parameter model, supported by 1000 bootstrap replicates. The distance scale was estimated at 0.1. Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Accession number U40085.1) was considered an out-group branch. Bootstrap values higher than 70% supported the topology on each branch.

In-vitro antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST)

AFSTs of voriconazole (VRC) (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and caspofungin (CSP) (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) were conducted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (CLSI M27-A3) [29]. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values were interpreted according to CLSI document M27-S4 clinical breakpoints [30, 31]. The serial concentrations of the CSP and VRC were 0.016 to 16 µg/mL. For AFST, the inoculums and suspensions were prepared by the spectrophotometric method at 530 nm. The suspensions were diluted 1:1000 in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco, UK) with a pH of 7.0 using 0.165 MOPS (3-N-morpholinopropane sulfonic acid) and adjusted to a final concentration of 1 × 103 to 5 × 103 CFU/ml. From each serial dilution, 100 µl was dispensed into columns of 96-well plates. Two columns were assigned as positive (without an antifungal agent) and negative (without fungal inoculum) controls. The plates were incubated at 35 ºC for 24 and 48 h. The 96-well plates were eventually read optically using a mirror. All tests were performed using two replicates on different days. C. parapsilosis (ATCC 22,019) was used for quality control in all experiments.

Statistical analysis

The SPSS 24.0 software was used for statistical analysis. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Mann-Whitney tests were used to assay the normality and mean equality of the quantitative variables (age and neutrophil count), respectively. The Chi-square method was used to compare the qualitative data (gender, AFT, and malignancy type). Moreover, the Spearman test was applied to evaluate the correlation between quantitative variables. We did not apply the Pearson correlation due to the fact that our quantitative variables did not have a normal distribution. Statistical significance was defined as p values less than 0.05.

Results

Patients characteristics

A total of 362 clinical samples were isolated from 138 neutropenic patients. Thirty-four were Candida-positive (24.63%). Patients ranged in age from 12 to 65 years old. Candida-positive patients had a median age of 36 (19–65) years old, and the median age of Candida-negative patients was 53.5 (12–70) years old (Table 1). According to the Mann-Whitney test, the ages of the patients in the two groups were statistically similar (p value: 0.452) (Fig. 1A).

Table 1 The analysis results of quantitative variables of the study
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Quantitative distribution of age and neutrophil levels

Full size image

Nineteen (25.7%) Candida-positive patients and 55 (74.3%) Candida-negative patients were men. The chi-square test indicated that gender was equally distributed among the two groups (p value: 0.844). Moreover, we found that men have a 22% higher chance rate for Candida positivity than women (odds ratio; OR: 1.22; 95% confidence interval; CI: 0.519 to 2.421). However, this was statistically insignificant (p value: 0.844) (Table 2 and Fig. 2A).

Table 2 The results of analysis for qualitative variables
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Column charts of sex (A), antifungal therapy (B), underlying cancer (C), and scatter chart of correlation between patient’s age and neutrophil counts (D)

Full size image

Seventy-nine Candida-negative patients had received AFT, but only nine Candida-positive patients had received it. This difference was statistically significant (p value: 0.00). AFT reduced the chance of Candida positivity by almost 76% in neutropenic patients (OR: 1.759; 95% CI: 1.349 to 2.390; p value: 0.000) (Fig. 2B and Table 2).

Among Candida-positive patients, 24 (70.59%) had a hematologic malignancy (HM) background, and 10 (29.41%) had a solid tumor (ST) background. Furthermore, the HM background increased the chance of Candida positivity by 98% when compared to the ST background (OR: 1.979; 95% CI: 1.113 to 4.550; p value: 0.002) (Fig. 2C and Table 2).

Moreover, we indicated that there was no statistical relationship between patients’ age and the severity of neutropenia (neutrophil count) (Spearman’s ratio: 1.00; p value: 0.637) (Fig. 2D). The median levels of neutrophil count among Candida-positive patients were 405 (200–700) cells/µl and among non-Candida patients, 990 (220–989) cells/µl. Also, the Mann-Whitney test indicated that the median neutrophil count differed statistically between Candida-positive and Candida-negative patients (p value: 0.00) (Fig. 1B and Table 1). According to Kruskal-Wallis test results, in this study, quantitative variables were not distributed normally (Fig. 3A and B, and Table 1).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Normal distribution plots for quantitative variables of the study

Full size image

Microbiological identification of yeasts

A total of 34 yeasts among 362 clinical samples from 138 neutropenic patients were collected and identified according to culture results on SDA and CHROMagar™ Candida medium. The isolates were as follows: 16 C. albicans, 10 C. glabrata, 4 C. krusei, 2 C. parapsilosis, and 1 C. tropicalis. Six isolates were suspected to be Candida species, which were considered for further evaluation by molecular methods. Moreover, all 16 C. albicans isolates were positive for chlamydospore production and germ tube formation examinations (Table 3). Thirteen isolates (38.23%), including 6 C. albicans, 5 C. glabrata, 1 C. parapsilosis, and 1 C. krusei, were collected from the oral cavity. Twelve isolates (32.25%), including 6 C. albicans, 3 C. glabrata, 1 C. parapsilosis, and 2 C. krusei, were isolated from the bloodstream. Six isolates (18.75%), including 3 C. albicans, 2 C. glabrata, and 1 C. tropicalis, were isolated from the urinary tract stream. Three isolates (8.82%), each one of which was C. albicans, C. glabrata, and C. krusei, were isolated from nail ulcers. Also, the six unknown isolates were collected from the oral cavity, blood, and urinary tract streams.

Table 3 Summary of findings of two diagnostic methods and sequencing confirmation
Full size table

Yeast identification based on the RFLP-PCR and sequencing reference method

All positive and suspected isolates were considered for further evaluation via RFLP-PCR. All Candida species that are identified via microbiological methods were confirmed in the RFLP-PCR assay (Fig. 4 and Table 3). Among the six suspected isolates, five were negative and excluded, and one was positive but undistinguishable on the electrophoresis. Online alignment and comparison of the ITS sequencing results for the PCR products of all 33 positive and 1 suspected isolates confirmed the RFLP-PCR findings. Furthermore, ITS sequencing confirmed that one suspected isolate was the rare C. lambica species, which was isolated from the bloodstream of a 56-year-old neutropenic man with an HM background. The results of molecular assays for 34 Candida isolates and GeneBank accession numbers are presented in Table 3; Fig. 4.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Agarose gel electrophoresis of restriction digestion by the MspI enzyme of Candida strains in PCR- RFLP; lanes 1–6. lane 1, C. parapsilosis; lane 2, C. lambica; lane 3, C. tropicalis; lane 4, C. krusei; lane 5, C. albicanse; lane 6, C. glabrata. M lane is 100 bp DNA markers

Full size image

Phylogenetic analysis

The topology of identified Candida species using ITS1 and ITS4 regions indicated that C. albicans, C. krusei, C. lambica, C. glabrata, C. tropicalis, and C. parapsilosis were placed in their specific clades (Fig. 5; marked by an asterisk [*]). Cladistic trees indicated that the Pichia kudriavzevii (C. krusei) clade has a sister relationship with the Pichia fermentans (C. lambica) clade.

Fig. 5
figure 5

The Phylogenetic tree based on ITS1 and ITS4 gene regions of Candida spp. using kimura 2-parameter model in Maximum Likelihood algorithm with 1000 bootstrap re-sampling. Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Accession number, U40085.1) was considered as an out-group branch. Bootstrap values of higher than 70% were supported the topology on each branch. Registered sequences characterized by asterisk (*) in this study

Full size image

Antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST)

According to the AFST results for VRC and CSP, 8 Candida isolates were non-susceptible, and 1 isolate was resistant to VRC and was isolated from the urinary tract stream of a woman with a HM background. Also, four isolates were not susceptible to CSP. Tables 4 and 5 show the MIC and epidemiological cut-off values, as well as susceptibility profiles for all Candida isolates and tested antifungals. The MIC range for CSP is 0.015 to 4 µg/mL; the MIC50 is 0.06 µg/mL; the MIC90 range is 0.133 to 0.375 µg/mL; and the MIC range for VRC is 0.03 to 2 µg/mL; the MIC50 is 0.12 to 0.185 µg/mL; and the MIC90 is 0.133 to 0.550 µg/mL.

Table 4 MIC profiles of antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST).
Full size table
Table 5 Epidemiological cut-off value of antifungals and susceptibility profiles of isolated Candida species
Full size table

Discussion

Candidiasis is one of the most prevalent infections among neutropenic patients. There are several studies that report the predominant C. albicans species among different immunosuppressed patients, especially neutropenic patients. Al Hatmi et al. [32], Jafarian et al. [33], and Brescini et al. [34] reported 26.7%, 36%, and 51% prevalence rates for C. albicans, respectively, while Hamzavi et al. [35] reported 72%. Al Hatmi et al. [32] discovered C. glabrata to be the most common non-albicans isolate (22.7%), as we did. Despite our findings, Hamzavi et al. [35] didn’t find any significant relationship between Candida colonization and age, sex, oncologic diseases, or degree of neutropenia. However, Villanueva et al. [36] reported that C. albicans was the most predominant agent of IFI in non-neutropenic patients with solid tumors, while C. tropicalis was the most predominant agent in neutropenic patients with hematological neoplasia. Therefore, we can conclude that it seems weird that C. glabrata was the predominant non-albicans strain in our study. However, we were not able to recognize IFIs due to limited access to patient’s data.

Husni et al. [37] reported conflicting results compared to Villanueva et al. [36]. They concluded that the balance of C. albicans and non-albicans strains corresponding to colonization or infection in neutropenic and non-neutropenic populations is not different [37]. However, there are several reasons to be concerned about the increase of non-albicans strains, which can be important for their resistance to antifungal issues. Some studies reported C. parapsilosis [38, 39], and some others [12, 40] reported C. tropicalis as the most frequent non-albicans strain in their neutropenic papulations. Also, Kronen et al. [41] reported a high hazard ratio (HR: 1.297, 0.909 to 1.849) for 59 C. krusei isolates that accounted for 64.4% of death episodesamong 1873 patients. For various reasons, we can conclude that an isolation site cannot be a reliable guide for predicting the pathogenicity of Candida species. One main reason, which was also seen in our findings, is the mutual source of Candida isolates [42]. In support of our findings, we found a study [43] that reported that urinary tract BSI was the source of 20.8% of overall BSI isolates in neutropenic patients.

Our findings show that Candida-positive patients had a median age of 36 (19–65) years, of whom 19 (25.7%) were men (p value: 0.00). We found that men have a 22% higher chance rate for Candida positivity than women (OR: 1.22; 95% CI: 0.519 to 2.421). However, this was statistically insignificant (p value: 0.844). In Al-Hatmi et al.’s study [32], the mean age of the positive patients was 54 years old, and 55.4% of them were men. Similarly, Brescini et al. [34] reported that the majority of their positive patients were males with a median age of 68 years old. However, the mean age of patients in Jafarian et al.’s study [33] was 7.85 years old due to their target population and inclusion criteria. Although we reached the insignificant statistical findings, these comparisons support our claim that neutropenic men are more susceptible to Candida positivity; however, the age of the patients is affected by the underlying diseases and the severity of their therapeutic strategies.

In the context of antifungal therapy, our findings were supported by the Zheng et al. study [13], which reached a success rate of 76.1% for AFT. Several studies have discussed AFT of neutropenic patients and reached acceptable findings [37, 38, 40, 44,45,46,47]. Cuervo et al. [48] suggested that the ESCMID and IDSA guidelines for antifungal therapy in neutropenic patients with candidemia be used. Despite several reports of unfavorable outcomes for some antifungals, Chandrasekar et al. [49] indicated a lower success rate for the clinical administration of micafungin in neutropenic patients. However, we can conclude that AFT was successful and should be considered in empirical and prophylactic therapy schemes for better management of neutropenic patients with risk of Candida positivity or infection.

In our study, 8 of 34 Candida isolates (23.53%) were non-susceptible, and one isolate (2.63%) was resistant to voriconazole. This isolate was isolated from the urinary tract stream of a woman with an HM background. Also, four isolates (11.76%) were not susceptible to CSP. During the six-year study, Bansal et al. [45] reported an anti-azole resistance rate of 20.0% (23/115) with a significant increase for C. tropicalis, which is similar to our findings. Also, Kimura et al. [50] indicated that 80% of the Candida strains isolated from patients with HMs and neutropenia were susceptible or showed wild-type susceptibility (72%) to micafungin. Also, Liu et al. [51] reported that 33.9% of isolates were non-susceptible to fluconazole (MIC50, 2 mg/L; MIC90, 16 mg/L; MIC range, 0.25 to > 256 mg/L), while 56.9% were non-susceptible to voriconazole (MIC50, 0.25 mg/L; MIC90, 1 mg/L; MIC range, 0.015 to > 8 mg/L) according to CLSI clinical breakpoints. We can conclude that the resistance patterns of our isolated species are not different from previous studies’ findings and don’t add novel findings to the context.

Despite the fact that we did not report any non-albicans-resistant strains, researchers came to conflicting conclusions. Ko et al. [52] indicated a high hazard ratio of fluconazole-resistant C. glabrata isolates causing BSI among neutropenic patients (hazard ratio; HR 3.960, 95% CI 1.395–11.246, p value: 0.010). Kim et al. [53] indicated an increased rate of candidemia and a sharp switch to fluconazole-resistant non-albicans species in Korea. In line with our findings, Breda et al. [54] reported that in neutropenic patients with candidemia, C. albicans isolates were more susceptible to antifungals than non-albicans isolates.

When compared to ST, the HM background increased the chance of Candida positivity by 98% (OR: 1.979; 95% CI: 1.113 to 4.550; p value: 0.002). We found that the median neutrophil count differed statistically between Candida-positive (405 [200–700] cells/µl) and Candida-negative (990 [220–989] cells/µl) patients (p value: 0.00). There are several studies that support our findings [40, 41, 43, 45, 53, 55,56,57,58,59].

Concerns have been raised about the emergence of uncommon Candida species strains [60], particularly in neutropenic patients. We discovered an unusual strain, C. lambica, in the bloodstream of a 56-year-old man with HM. Fortunately, the AFST revealed no resistance status against either of the tested antifungals (MIC for VRC: 1 µg/mL and MIC for CSP: 0,12 µg/mL). Vervaeke et al. [61] reported a pathogenic case of C. lambica in the bloodstream of an intravenous drug abuser, a 19-year-old man. In comparison, we discovered similar susceptibility profiles to VRC. Vervaeke et al. [61] reached susceptible MIC values of 0.125, 0.064, and 2 µg/mL for AmB, ITC, and flucytosine, respectively, and a resistant MIC value of > 64 µg/mL for FLC.

Conclusion

We concluded that neutropenia and hematological malignancies were the main risk factors for Candida isolation from cancer/neutropenic patients. Also, the prevalence of non-albicans strains remained high in this population. Antifungal therapy was the most effective inhibitor of positivity of Candida species. This positivity can lead to the possible infection under specific circumstances. As a result, we recommend following infection control guidelines. This study focused on the microbiological and epidemiological characteristics of Candida species among neutropenic patients. Further studies utilizing various molecular diagnostic methods and antifungal susceptibility testing over different time periods are recommended for better prediction, investigating the clinical findings, and management of fungal infections in neutropenic patients.

Data availability

The six sequences generated in this study were deposited in the GenBank database (accession numbers with persistent accessible links of: OP647129.1, OP647128.1, OP647127.1, OP650915.1, OP647217.1, OP658936.1, OP658946.1, OP658947.1, OP658919.1. All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its related links.

Change history

References

  1. Eissa S, Khedr R, Romeih M, Halaby L, Elanany M, Madney Y. Clinical characteristics and outcome of invasive fungal sinusitis in children with hematological malignancies. Med Mycol. 2022;60(4):myac010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lin G-L, Chang H-H, Lu C-Y, Chen C-M, Lu M-Y, Lee P-I, Jou S-T, Yang Y-L, Huang L-M, Chang L-Y. Clinical characteristics and outcome of invasive fungal Infections in pediatric acute Myeloid Leukemia patients in a medical center in Taiwan. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2018;51(2):251–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ruijters VJ, Oosterom N, Wolfs TF, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, van Grotel M. Frequency and determinants of invasive fungal Infections in children with solid and hematologic malignancies in a nonallogeneic stem cell transplantation setting: a narrative review. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2019;41(5):345–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fakhim H, Vaezi A, Javidnia J, Nasri E, Mahdi D, Diba K, Badali H. Candida Africana vulvovaginitis: prevalence and geographical distribution. J De Mycol Médicale. 2020;30(3):100966.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Desai JV, Lionakis MS. The role of neutrophils in host defense against invasive fungal Infections. Curr Clin Microbiol Rep. 2018;5:181–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Dehghan P, Tolouie S, Baradaran B, Nami S, Morovati H. TLR-2, IL-10 and IL-17-mediated immunity in experimental chemotherapy murine model of systemic candidiasis; cyclophosphamides’ impact and roles. Microb Pathog. 2018;119:183–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shankar M, Lo TL, Traven A. Natural variation in clinical isolates of Candida albicans modulates neutrophil responses. Msphere. 2020;5(4):e00501–00520.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Lopes JP, Lionakis MS. Pathogenesis and virulence of Candida albicans. Virulence. 2022;13(1):89–121.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang Y, Zhou J, Zou Y, Chen X, Liu L, Qi W, Huang X, Chen C, Liu N-N. Fungal commensalism modulated by a dual-action phosphate transceptor. Cell Rep. 2022;38(4):110293.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Corcione S, Angilletta R, Raviolo S, Filippini C, Fossati L, Di Perri G, Cavallo R, De Rosa FG. Epidemiology and risk factors for mortality in bloodstream Infection by CP-Kp, ESBL-E, Candida and CDI: a single center retrospective study. Eur J Intern Med. 2018;48:44–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Widmer AF, Kern WV, Roth JA, Dettenkofer M, Goetting T, Bertz H, Theilacker C. Group HISSfPwHOMS: early versus late onset bloodstream Infection during neutropenia after high-dose chemotherapy for hematologic malignancy. Infection. 2019;47:837–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ye N, Liu Z, Tang W, Li X, Chu W, Zhou Q. Systematic Characterization of Epidemiology, Antifungal susceptibility, risk factors and outcomes of Candidaemia: a six-year Chinese study. Infect Drug Resist 2022:4887–98.

  13. Zheng Y-J, Xie T, Wu L, Liu X-Y, Zhu L, Chen Y, Mao E-Q, Han L-Z, Chen E-Z, Yang Z-T. Epidemiology, species distribution, and outcome of nosocomial Candida spp. bloodstream Infection in Shanghai: an 11-year retrospective analysis in a tertiary care hospital. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2021;20(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Maddy AJ, Sanchez N, Shukla BS, Maderal AD. Dermatological manifestations of fungal Infection in patients with febrile neutropaenia: a review of the literature. Mycoses. 2019;62(9):826–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chumbita M, Puerta-Alcalde P, Gudiol C, Garcia-Pouton N, Laporte-Amargós J, Ladino A, Albasanz-Puig A, Helguera C, Bergas A, Grafia I. Impact of empirical antibiotic regimens on mortality in neutropenic patients with bloodstream Infection presenting with septic shock. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022;66(2):e01744–01721.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Viscoli C, Varnier O, Machetti M. Infections in patients with febrile neutropenia: epidemiology, microbiology, and risk stratification. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40(Supplement4):240–S245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jenks JD, Cornely OA, Chen SCA, Thompson GR III, Hoenigl M. Breakthrough invasive fungal Infections: who is at risk? Mycoses. 2020;63(10):1021–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Arastehfar A, Fang W, Badali H, Vaezi A, Jiang W, Liao W, Pan W, Hagen F, Boekhout T. Low-cost tetraplex PCR for the global spreading multi-drug resistant fungus, Candida Auris and its phylogenetic relatives. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1119.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Gamaletsou MN, Walsh TJ, Sipsas NV. Invasive fungal Infections in patients with hematological malignancies: emergence of resistant pathogens and new antifungal therapies. Turkish J Hematol. 2018;35(1):1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ghorbani A, Sadrzadeh A, Habibi E, Dadgar K, Akbari J, Moosazadeh M, Hossein B, Ahangarkani F, Vaezi A. Efficacy of Camellia sinensis extract against Candida species in patients with denture stomatitis. Curr Med Mycol. 2018;4(3):15.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Clancy CJ, Pappas PG, Vazquez J, Judson MA, Kontoyiannis DP, Thompson GR III, Garey KW, Reboli A, Greenberg RN, Apewokin S. Detecting Infections rapidly and easily for candidemia trial, part 2 (DIRECT2): a prospective, multicenter study of the T2Candida panel. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66(11):1678–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Freifeld AG, Bow EJ, Sepkowitz KA, Boeckh MJ, Ito JI, Mullen CA, Raad II, Rolston KV, Young J-AH, Wingard JR. Clinical practice guideline for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer: 2010 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(4):e56–e93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nami S, Aghebati-Maleki A, Morovati H, Aghebati-Maleki L. Current antifungal Drugs and immunotherapeutic approaches as promising strategies to treatment of fungal Diseases. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019;110:857–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dale DC. How I diagnose and treat neutropenia. Curr Opin Hematol. 2016;23(1):1.

    Article  MathSciNet  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Donnelly JP, Chen SC, Kauffman CA, Steinbach WJ, Baddley JW, Verweij PE, Clancy CJ, Wingard JR, Lockhart SR, Groll AH. Revision and update of the consensus definitions of invasive fungal Disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71(6):1367–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Silva GAd, Bernardi TL, Schaker PDC, Menegotto M, Valente P. Rapid yeast DNA extraction by boiling and freeze-thawing without using chemical reagents and DNA purification. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology. 2012;55:319–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mirhendi H, Makimura K, Khoramizadeh M, Yamaguchi H. A one-enzyme PCR-RFLP assay for identification of six medically important Candida species. Nippon Ishinkin Gakkai Zasshi. 2006;47(3):225–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Fontecha G, Montes K, Ortiz B, Galindo C, Braham S. Identification of cryptic species of four Candida complexes in a culture collection. J Fungi. 2019;5(4):117.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wayne P. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts; approved standard. CLSI document M27-A3 and Supplement S 2008, 3:6–12.

  30. Pfaller M, Diekema D. Progress in antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida spp. by use of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution methods, 2010 to 2012. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(9):2846–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Wayne P. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts; approved standard. CLSI document M27-S4 and fourth informational supplement 2012.

  32. Alhatmi H, Almansour S, Abanamy R, Akbar A, Abalkhail M, Alharbi A, Alsaedy A, Mahmoud E, Alalwan B, AlJohani S. Clinical characteristics and outcome of candidemia: experience from a tertiary referral center in Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2022;10(2):125.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Jafarian H, Gharaghani M, Asnafi AA, Hardani AK, Zarei-Mahmoudabadi A. Phenotype, genotype, and mating type determination in oral Candida albicans isolates from pediatric patients with neutropenia. J Clin Lab Anal. 2022;36(9):e24664.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Brescini L, Mazzanti S, Morroni G, Pallotta F, Masucci A, Orsetti E, Montalti R, Barchiesi F. Candidemia in internal medicine: facing the new challenge. Mycopathologia. 2022;187(2–3):181–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Hamzavi SS, Amanati A, Badiee P, Kadivar MR, Jafarian H, Ghasemi F, Haghpanah S, Dehghani M, Norouzian Baghani A. Changing face of Candida colonization pattern in pediatric patients with hematological malignancy during repeated hospitalizations, results of a prospective observational study (2016–2017) in shiraz, Iran. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Villanueva F, Veliz J, Canasa K, Bellido E, Martell S, Ortega S, Cajamarca I. Characteristics of fungemia in a Peruvian referral center: 5-year retrospective analysis. Revista Peruana De Medicina Experimental Y Salud Pública. 2020;37:276–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Husni R, Chrabieh R, Dib RW, Vazquez J, Guimaraes T, Fernández A, Khoury R, Asmar L, Khazen G, Samaha N. Timing for step-down therapy of candidemia in non-neutropenic patients: an international multi-center study. Mediterranean J Hematol Infect Dis 2021, 13(1).

  38. Barrientos ACM, de Almeida Junior JN, Litvinov N, Bain V, Cristofani LM, Pereira MFB, de Paula CSY, Motta AL, Rossi F, Del Negro GMB. Breakthrough candidemia in pediatric patients with cancer from a Brazilian center. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2021;40(3):251–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sun M, Chen C, Xiao W, Chang Y, Liu C, Xu Q. Increase in Candida parapsilosis candidemia in cancer patients. Mediterranean J Hematol Infect Dis 2019, 11(1).

  40. Kim S-H, Choi J-K, Cho S-Y, Lee H-J, Park SH, Choi S-M, Lee D-G, Choi J-H, Yoo J-H, Lee J-W. Risk factors and clinical outcomes of breakthrough yeast bloodstream Infections in patients with hematological malignancies in the era of newer antifungal agents. Med Mycol. 2018;56(2):197–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kronen R, Hsueh K, Lin C, Powderly WG, Spec A. Creation and assessment of a clinical predictive calculator and mortality associated with Candida krusei bloodstream Infections. Open forum infectious Diseases: 2018. Oxford University Press US; 2018. p. ofx253.

  42. Elbaz M, Chikly A, Meilik R, Ben-Ami R. Frequency and Clinical Features of Candida Bloodstream Infection Originating in the urinary tract. J Fungi. 2022;8(2):123.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Wang K, Hsueh K, Kronen R, Lin C, Salazar AS, Powderly WG, Spec A. Creation and assessment of a clinical predictive model for candidaemia in patients with candiduria. Mycoses. 2019;62(7):554–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Lim C, Sinha P, Harrison SJ, Quach H, Slavin MA, Teh BW. Low rates of invasive fungal Disease in patients with Multiple Myeloma managed with new generation therapies: results from a multi-centre cohort study. Mycoses. 2021;64(1):30–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bansal N, Sachdeva N, Bhurani D, Agarwal N, Halder R, Goyal P. Candida Empyema in Febrile Neutropenia-augmented value of direct inoculation into BacT/Alert blood culture vials. Ind J Med Microbiol. 2022;40(3):440–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Taghipour S, Kiasat N, Shafiei S, Halvaeezadeh M, Rezaei-Matehkolaei A, Mahmoudabadi AZ. Luliconazole, a new antifungal against Candida species isolated from different sources. J De Mycol Medicale. 2018;28(2):374–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. You L, Yao C, Yang F, Yang Q, Lan J, Song X, Shen J, Sheng X, Chen X, Tang H. Echinocandins versus amphotericin B against Candida tropicalis fungemia in adult hematological patients with neutropenia: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Infect Drug Resist 2020:2229–35.

  48. Cuervo G, Garcia-Vidal C, Puig-Asensio M, Merino P, Vena A, Martín-Peña A, Montejo JM, Ruiz A, Lázaro-Perona F, Fortún J. Usefulness of guideline recommendations for prognosis in patients with candidemia. Med Mycol. 2019;57(6):659–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Chandrasekar P, Sirohi B, Seibel NL, Hsu JW, Azie N, Wu C, Ruhnke M. Efficacy of micafungin for the treatment of invasive candidiasis and candidaemia in patients with neutropenia. Mycoses. 2018;61(5):331–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Kimura M, Araoka H, Yamamoto H, Nakamura S, Nagi M, Yamagoe S, Miyazaki Y, Ogura S, Mitsuki T, Yuasa M. Micafungin breakthrough fungemia in patients with hematological disorders. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018;62(5):e02183–02117.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Liu W-L, Huang Y-T, Hsieh M-H, Hii M, Lee Y-L, Ho M-W, Liu C-E, Chen Y-H, Wang F-D. Clinical characteristics of Candida tropicalis fungaemia with reduced triazole susceptibility in Taiwan: a multicentre study. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2019;53(2):185–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ko J-H, Peck KR, Jung DS, Lee JY, Kim HA, Ryu SY, Jung S-I, Joo E-J, Cheon S, Kim Y-S. Impact of high MIC of fluconazole on outcomes of Candida Glabrata bloodstream Infection: a retrospective multicenter cohort study. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018;92(2):127–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Kim JH, Suh JW, Kim MJ. Epidemiological trends of candidemia and the impact of adherence to the candidemia guideline: six-year single-center experience. J Fungi. 2021;7(4):275.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Breda GL, Tuon FF, Meis JF, Herkert PF, Hagen F, de Oliveira LZ, Dias VC, da Cunha CA, Queiroz-Telles F. Breakthrough candidemia after the introduction of broad spectrum antifungal agents: a 5-year retrospective study. Med Mycol. 2018;56(4):406–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Ghanem-Zoubi N, Johad Khoury M, Merav Arnon M, Danny Zorbavel M, Paul M. Risk factors for non-albicans candidemia focusing on prior antifungal and immunosuppressive therapy. Isr Med Association J (IMAJ) 2019.

  56. Keighley CL, Pope A, Marriott DJ, Chapman B, Bak N, Daveson K, Hajkowicz K, Halliday C, Kennedy K, Kidd S. Risk factors for candidaemia: a prospective multi-centre case‐control study. Mycoses. 2021;64(3):257–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Kimura M, Asano-Mori Y, Sakoh T, Abe M, Ueno K, Hoshino Y, Nakamura S, Umeyama T, Yamagoe S, Miyazaki Y. Factors Associated with breakthrough Fungemia caused by Candida, Trichosporon, or Fusarium species in patients with Hematological disorders. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022;66(3):e02081–02021.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Ngamchokwathana C, Chongtrakool P, Waesamaae A, Chayakulkeeree M. Risk factors and outcomes of non-albicans Candida Bloodstream Infection in patients with Candidemia at Siriraj Hospital—Thailand’s Largest National Tertiary Referral Hospital. J Fungi. 2021;7(4):269.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Paixao de Sousa da Silva AM, de Moraes-Pinto MI, Teofilo Pignati L, Barbosa Teixeira B, Cordeiro Lima AP, Costa Pimentel Germano P, Petrilli AS, Marques LMA, Carlesse F. Candida Spp bloodstream Infections in a latin American Pediatric Oncology Reference Center: Epidemiology and associated factors. Mycoses. 2020;63(8):812–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Chen SC, Marriott D, Playford E, Nguyen Q, Ellis D, Meyer W, Sorrell T, Slavin M. Candidaemia with uncommon Candida species: predisposing factors, outcome, antifungal susceptibility, and implications for management. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009;15(7):662–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Vervaeke S, Vandamme K, Boone E, De Laere E, Swinne D, Surmont I. A case of Candida lambica fungemia misidentified as Candida krusei in an intravenous drug abuser. Sabouraudia. 2008;46(8):853–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Clinical Research Development Unit, Imam Reza General Hospital, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the Infectious and Tropical Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Iran, (Grant No: IR.TBZMED.REC.1399.1157).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Parasitology and Mycology, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

    Parviz Hassanpour, Adel Spotin, Hossein Abdollahzadeh & Sanam Nami

  2. Department of Parasitology and Mycology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Parviz Hassanpour

  3. Department of Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

    Hamid Morovati

  4. Immunology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

    Leili Aghebati-Maleki

  5. Hematology and Oncology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

    Mortaza Raeisi

  6. Faculty of Paramedicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

    Mohammad Ahangarzadeh Rezaee

  7. Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

    Alka Hasani

  8. Infectious and Tropical Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

    Alka Hasani & Sanam Nami

  9. Stem Cell Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

    Ali Aghebati-Maleki

Authors
  1. Parviz Hassanpour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Adel Spotin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hamid Morovati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Leili Aghebati-Maleki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mortaza Raeisi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mohammad Ahangarzadeh Rezaee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Alka Hasani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ali Aghebati-Maleki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Hossein Abdollahzadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Sanam Nami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SN, PH, AS and HM: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, project administration, validation, writing-original draft, writing reviews, and editing. LAM, MR, MAR, AH, AAM, and HA: data curation, investigation, methodology, validation, and formal analysis. All the authors read, revised, and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanam Nami.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Tabriz University of Medical Science (Permission ID: IR.TBZMED.REC.1399.1157). Informed consent was taken from all participants and parents/legally authorized representatives of all minors (age less than 16 years) and deceased participants involved in the study. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations (Declaration of Helsinki).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: Following publication of the original article, we have been notified that “Infectious and Tropical Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran” should be shown as Prof. Sanam Nami?s first affiliation instead of “Department of Parasitology and Mycology, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran”.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hassanpour, P., Spotin, A., Morovati, H. et al. Molecular diagnosis, phylogenetic analysis, and antifungal susceptibility profiles of Candida species isolated from neutropenic oncological patients. BMC Infect Dis 23, 765 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08774-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08774-z

Keywords

BMC Infectious Diseases

ISSN: 1471-2334

Contact us