Skip to main content

Factors related to the mortality risk of severe hand, foot, and mouth diseases (HFMD): a 5-year hospital-based survey in Guangxi, Southern China

Abstract

Background

To understand the factors influencing clinical outcomes of severe hand, foot, and mouth diseases (HFMD), and to provide scientific evidence for reducing the mortality risk of severe HFMD.

Methods

From 2014 to 2018, children diagnosed with severe HFMD cases in Guangxi, China, were enrolled in this hospital-based study. The epidemiological data obtained through face-to-face interviews with the parents and guardians. Univariate and multivariate logistics regression models were used to analyze the factors influencing the clinical outcomes of severe HFMD. The impact of the EV-A71 vaccination on inpatient mortality was analyzed by a comparison approach.

Results

A total of 1565 severe HFMD cases were enrolled in this survey, including 1474 (94.19%) survival cases and 91 (5.81%) death cases. The multivariate logistic analysis demonstrated that HFMD history of playmates in the last three months, first visit to the village hospital, time from the first visit to admission less than two days, no correct diagnosis for HFMD at the first visit, and having no rash symptoms were the independent risk factors for severe HFMD cases (all p < 0.05). While EV-A71 vaccination was a protective factor (p < 0.05). The EV-A71 vaccination group versus the non-vaccination group showed 2.23% of death in the vaccination group and 7.24% of death in the non-vaccination group. The EV-A71 vaccination protected 70.80% of the death of severe HFMD cases, with an effective index of 4.79.

Conclusions

The mortality risk of severe HFMD in Guangxi was related to playmates had HFMD history in last 3 months, hospital grade, EV-A71 vaccination, patients visit hospital previously, and rash symptom. EV-A71 vaccination can significantly reduce mortality among severe HFMD. The findings are of great significance for the effective prevention and control of HFMD in Guangxi, southern China.

Peer Review reports

Background

Hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) is an acute contagious disease caused by human enteroviruses (EVs), which mostly affects children under five years old. The transmission of HFMD is mainly through direct contact with saliva, faces, vesicular fluid, respiratory droplets of the infected individual, or indirect contact with contaminated objects. Generally, HFMD is a self-limited disease. However, some patients may also develop neurologic complications such as neurogenic pulmonary edema, aseptic meningitis, acute flaccid paralysis, and encephalitis, and even die [1]. Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, located in Southern China, is one of the worst-hit provinces for HFMD. The average morbidity and mortality have consistently ranked first among all provinces in mainland China over the decade. There were about 9,000 severe HFMD cases in Guangxi from 2012 to 2015 [3]. In recent years, the severe cases and fatal cases were on the rise, hundreds of cases with central nervous system complications were emerged, resulting in nearly 100 deaths. This poses a serious public health challenge for local health systems [2, 3]. In addition to a higher risk of death, severe HFMD patients have sequelae such as dysfunctional aerodigestive tract, neurological sequelae, delayed neurodevelopment, impaired cognition even after treatment [4]. The sequelae can greatly reduce the life quality of the patients, increase the burden on families, and cause over-expenditure on the social economy. Enterovirus A71 (EV-A71) was the dominant etiological agent of severe HFMD in Southern China.

Due to the excessive economic and disease burden caused by Enterovirus A71 and no specific drugs to cure this disease in the clinic, the development of EV-A71 vaccines is of great importance for China. Three different inactivated EV-A71 vaccines were approved for the market after the completion of clinical trials by the China Food and Drug Administration, Chinese medical discipline Institute of Medical Biology (Kunming) (licensed for the market in 2015), Beijing Sinovac Biology Products Co., LTD. (Beijing Sinovac) (licensed for the market in 2015) and Wuhan institute of biological products CO., LTD (Wuhan) (licensed for the market in 2016). The EV-A71 inactivated vaccine was developed based on Vero-cell without aluminum hydroxide, and the vaccine strain is generated from a C4 genotype strain (GenBank: GU198367.1). And the Sinovac EV-A71 vaccine has shown immunogenicity, safety, effectiveness, and immune persistence in children older than 6 months [5,6,7]. Further, the efficacy of over 95% against EV-A71-related HFMD was reported in some studies [8, 9].

Since 2016, Guangxi has launched a universal vaccination campaign against EV-A71 for children under 5 years old. As of December 31, 2019, EV-A71 vaccination cumulative coverage in Guangxi was 32.8%, and 27.3% of children under five years of age had completed the 2-dose vaccination, and the proportion of HFMD cases aged 0–12 months decreased from 23.0% to 15.3% between 2013–2015 and 2017–2019 [10].To the best of our knowledge, few studies have assessed the impact and effectiveness of the vaccination in reducing mortality of HFMD hospitalized patients in real-world settings. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the influencing factors of clinical outcomes of severe HFMD cases in southern China, and to further evaluate the effect of the monovalent inactivated EV-A71 vaccination as a protective factor in reducing mortality.

Methods

Study design and study population

A hospital-based epidemiological survey was conducted in Guangxi, a province in southern China where HFMD is prevalent. Cases of severe HFMD from 2014 to 2018 were collected from Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Center for Disease Prevention and Control (CDC) system. The definition of severe HFMD was referred to the “diagnosis and treatment guidelines for HFMD” (2010)” [11], and the diagnosis criteria are as follow: (1) frequent convulsions, coma and cerebral hernia; (2) breathing difficulties, cyanosis, bloody frothy sputum and pulmonary rales; and (3) shock and circulatory insufficiency. In our study, subjects were included if: (1) Severe HFMD cases: clinical severity was defined as the patient experienced any neurological complications (aseptic meningitis, encephalitis, encephalomyelitis, acute flaccid paralysis, or autonomic nervous system dysregulation) and/or cardiopulmonary complications (pulmonary edema, pulmonary hemorrhage, or cardiorespiratory failure) and/or circulatory system symptoms (pale face, cold limbs, fingers (toes) cyanosis, cold sweat, et al.), Severe HFMD cases were classified if the patients experienced any symptoms belonging to the clinical severity, others were categorized as mild cases [11, 12]. (2) Patient’s parents approved of participation; (3) Individuals with completed investigation data. Subjects were excluded if: (1) The neurological dysfunction was caused by non-HFMD; (2) Patients with incomplete investigation data. All participants understood the purpose of the study and signed the informed consent forms. An investigation was performed following the relevant guidelines and regulations; cases of severe HFMD from 2014 to 2018 were collected from Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Center for Disease Prevention and Control (CDC) system, the investigation was done by the staff of the CDC.

The sample size can be calculated by the following formula: \(\mathrm{n}= \frac{{Z}_{1-\alpha /2}^{2}*\pi (1-\pi )}{{\delta }^{2}}\). The annual proportion of severe HFMD diseases was set at about 20% [3, 10], then we calculated the sample size using the PASS software.

Data collection

Detailed clinical data of the severe HFMD patients were collected by reviewing the medical records. Socio-demographic characteristics of the patients were collected via face-to-face interviews with patients and guardians using a structured questionnaire (Additional file 2) [13]. The collected information included demographic characteristics (gender, age, EV-A71 vaccination, the patient was hospitalized for other reasons previously, HFMD history of patient’s daily playmates prior to the onset of the current illness, etc.), disease characteristics, diagnosis, and treatment (date of the illness onset, first diagnosis and admission, severe HFMD diagnosis, clinical severity at admission, hospital grade of initial and severe HFMD diagnosis, rash symptoms, etc.). Questionnaire validation: The structural questionnaire we used to collect data was developed by China CDC. It was recommended to apply to invest the severity hospitalization HFMD cases in mainland China through a National Guideline [13]. The local health authority approved the utilization of the questionnaire.

Definitions

  1. 1.

    Vaccine protection against death. The percentage of death among vaccinated patients was protected compared with that among unvaccinated patients. The following formula was used to calculate the vaccine protection against death:

    $$\mathrm{Protective \, Effectiveness }\left(\mathrm{PE}\right)= \left(1-\mathrm{ odds \, ratio}\right)*100\mathrm{\%}$$
  2. 2.

    Index of effectiveness against death. It is defined as the number of death in the unvaccinated group divided by the number of deaths in the vaccinated group.

Statistical analyses

Statistical sofrware: All statistical analyses were performed using R software (version 4.04) and IBM SPSS Statistics (version 26).

Regression model: Univariate and multivariate logistics regression models were used to analyze the factors influencing the clinical outcomes of severe HFMD. The “Forward” method was used to select the factors into the logistic regression model. The influencing factors were first analyzed by the univariate analysis, then the variables with differences (p < 0.1) were included in the multivariate logistic regression model. Variables with significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) are considered in the final interpretation. All the comparisons were two-sided, and the p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant. The OR and 95%CI were compared between the survival group and the death groups.

Results

Demographics characteristics

As shown in Table 1, a total of 1565 patients with severe HFMD were enrolled in this study, including 998 males (63.77%) and 567 females (36.23%), with a male-to-female ratio of 1.76:1. The median age of the patients was 1.83 years old (0–11.69 years). Severe HFMD occurred mainly in children under 3 years old (80.57%). There were 1288 severe HFMD cases in rural areas, accounting for 82.30%, and the ratio of rural to urban was 4.75:1. Among all 1565 severe HFMD cases, 91 cases died (5.81%, 91/1565). Univariate analysis indicated that, between the survival group and death group, there was no significant difference in the distribution of gender, age, area, registered residence, group classification, etc. (Table 1) (all p > 0.05). While there was a significant difference (p < 0.05) in EV-A71 vaccination, visiting hospital previously, HFMD history of playmates in the last 3 months, hospital grade of first visit, correct diagnosis at first visit, time interval from first visit to diagnosis of severe HFMD, clinical severity at admission and rash symptoms (Table 1).

Table 1 Epidemiological characteristics of severe HFMD cases in Guangxi, 2014–2018, grouped by survival and death

Multivariate logistic analysis

To further determine the factors influencing the clinical outcomes of severe HFMD, multivariate logistics regression analysis was performed, and the variables with differences (p < 0.1) in univariate analysis (Table 1) were included in the multivariate logistic regression model. The status (survival and death) at the end of the follow-up was set as the outcome variable (survival = 0, death = 1). Among the independence variables, we set female, no HFMD history of playmates in last 3 months, EV-A71 vaccination, no visiting hospital previously, first visit to the city hospital, time interval from first visit to diagnosis of severe HFMD ≥ 3 days, correct diagnosis at first visit, having rash symptoms as the reference, respectively, to calculate internal OR values (Table 2). The multivariate logistics regression analysis showed that playmates had HFMD history in last three months (OR: 2.30, 95%CI: 1.31–4.03), no EV-A71 vaccination (OR: 4.98, 95%CI: 2.63–9.43), patients visit hospital previously (OR: 4.23, 95%CI: 1.45–12.33), the first visit to village hospital (OR: 6.67, 95%CI: 2.35–18.94), township(OR: 4.28, 95%CI:1.45–12.61), and county(OR:3.05, 95%CI:1.18–7.85), no correct diagnosis for HFMD at the first visit(OR:3.05, 95%CI:1.18–7.85), the time interval from the first visit to diagnosis of severe HFMD ≤ 1 day (OR: 6.37, 95%CI: 2.74–14.80) or 1–2 days (OR: 3.48, 95%CI: 1.78–6.84), having no rash symptoms (OR: 4.60, 95%CI: 1.54–13.67) were the promoting factors for death risk among severe HFMD cases (Table 2).

Table 2 Multivariate logistic analysis of potential risk factors for death in severe HFMD patients

Analysis of impact of EV-A71 vaccination on death in severe HFMD patients

To further investigate the impact of inactivated monovalent EV-A71 vaccination on death in severe HFMD patients, we described the epidemiological characteristics grouped by vaccination or not, and there were 628 patients and 925patients in the vaccinated and unvaccinated group, respectively. The results showed that there was a significant difference (p < 0.05) between the vaccinated and unvaccinated group in number of children 0–5 years old in the family, milk feeding way, hospital level of the first visit, severe diagnosis hospital level, the time from the first visit to admission (Additional file 1). The analysis indicated that 2.23% of the patients died in the vaccinated group and 7.24% in the unvaccinated group (p < 0.01). The inactivated monovalent EV-A71 vaccine can protect 70.80% of death among severe HFMD cases, and the effectiveness index against death was 4.79 (Table 3).

Table 3 Analysis of protective effect of EV-A71 vaccination on death of severe HFMD cases

Discussion

HFMD has become a serious public health problem in the Asia–Pacific region due to the large number of severe and fatal cases in a short period, and has been listed as a mandatory notifiable infectious disease in mainland China in 2008 [14, 15]. Our study showed that the majority of severe and dead HFMD cases occurred in children under 3 years of age, which was consistent with the previous studies in Guangxi and other provinces in China [15,16,17]. Most severe HFMD cases occur in children under 3-year-old, possibly due to the poor immune system of the young children. There was a higher prevalence among males than in females, which may be related to boys’ frequent exposure to enterovirus-contaminated environments or toys, where poor hygiene may increase the chance of infection [18, 19]. However, our study showed that there was no significant difference in clinical outcomes among different gender groups (Table 1), suggesting that gender had little effect on the disease progression.

In this study, we found that children who lived in the rural areas were more likely to develop severe HFMD, which is in line with previous studies in Guangxi [20]. Previous studies have found that poor medical conditions and poor guardian awareness of HFMD treatment are the influencing factors for the development of severe HFMD and mortality in rural areas in China [21,22,23]. Meanwhile, rural patients are more willing to seek medical treatment nearby, which is a possible reason for the higher mortality of HFMD in rural areas. Rural village or township health service centers often do not have adequate conditions for HFMD diagnosis and treatment. Because some HFMD cases have hidden or asymptomatic symptoms in the early stage, the inadequate capacity of village or township health service centers for diagnosis and treatment may lead to prolonged and inappropriate treatment. In addition, due to the limitations of medical resources and economic conditions, the mortality of HFMD is high in some regions in China, especially in the underdeveloped Guangxi [24, 25]. Given the fact that HFMD cases in Guangxi are most concentrated in rural areas, primary medical centers, including village and township health service centers, need to improve the ability of precision diagnosis and treatment, such as introducing new diagnostic technologies or instruments to make rapid and accurate diagnosis, so that HFMD patients can receive timely treatment.

Our study showed that severe HFMD without skin rash symptoms was a risk factor for death, which is consistent with other studies [26]. Skin rash is an obvious physical sign that may prompt the guardians to take their children to see the doctor, so the patients with skin rash may have more chances to meet the doctor and get timely treatment. On the other hand, HMFD patients without skin rash or other clinical symptoms may miss opportunity to visit the hospital because the guardians were unaware of the occurrence of HMFD, thus increasing the risk of developing severe HFMD and even death. Our study also found that the time interval from the first visit to diagnosis of severe HMFD was a significant risk factor for mortality. In general, a shorter time from the first visit to diagnosis should improve clinical outcomes. However, our results show an opposite trend (Table 2). We speculated that this may be related to insufficient awareness of HFMD among guardians, which often leads to delay in visiting to hospital. The delayed visit of hospital means that some patients will quickly become serious or critical in a shorter time, and these patients are most likely to die of cardiopulmonary failure due to delayed treatment. Therefore, in this sense, it is of particular importance to strengthen the education of guardians on HFMD knowledge and improve their awareness of children seeking medical treatment, which may become an effective strategy to prevent the death of HFMD in rural areas.

It is worth mentioning that an important finding of our study is the protective effect of EV-A71vaccination against death of severe HFMD cases. EV-A71 is the primary pathogen of HFMD and is also the main cause of severe and fatal HFMD cases [27, 28]. Previous studies have shown that inactivated monovalent EV-71 vaccine has a protective effect of about 85.4% against EV-71 virus infection [29], however, which also means that some immunized children will still infected with EV-71 virus. This raises the interesting question of whether there is a reduction in mortality in patients who remain infected with EVs after EV-A71 immunization. Our study provides a positive answer that EV-A71vaccination is effective in preventing death of severe HFMD cases, evidenced by the fact that EV-A71 vaccination protected 70.80% of the death of severe HFMD cases (Table 3). The protective effect of EV-A71 vaccination on mortality is of great significance, which is comparable with that of COVID-19 vaccination, although the vaccination has little protective effect on viral infection, it can greatly reduce the mortality [7, 30,31,32,33]. In addition, another interesting question is whether EV-71 vaccination protects against death from severe HFMD cases caused by other EVs infections, such as Cox-16. Our data showed that among 27 severe HFMD cases caused by Cox-16 infection, there were 3 deaths in EV-71 unvaccinated group but zero death in EV-71vaccinated group, preliminarily suggesting that EV-71 vaccination may have a protective effect against death caused by Cox-16 infection. Our current data is too few to do statistical analysis, but this is a direction worth focusing on in the future.

Our study has several advantages. First, this is a multicenter study, with samples from almost all medical institutions in Guangxi, covering almost all of severe HFMD cases in Guangxi during 2014–2018. Second, this study is a hospital-based study. Most of the data came from medical records, which are accurate and reliable. Third, the sample size is relatively large, facilitating statistical analysis. Meanwhile, this study has several limitations. First, the subjects enrolled in this study were hospitalized patients with severe HFMD. Because HFMD is a self-limited disease, not all the severe HFMD cases were hospitalized. Especially in village or township health service centers, a small number of patients were treated by combining outpatient and home medication. Second, the retrospective nature makes it less accurate in assessing the effect of vaccination than prospective clinical trials.

Conclusions

Through a hospital-based epidemiologic study, we found that the mortality risk of severe HFMD in Guangxi was related to HFMD history of playmates, hospital grade, EV-A71 vaccination, correct diagnosis at first visit, Time interval from first visit to diagnosis of severe HFMD and rash symptom. More importantly, we found EV-A71 vaccination can significantly reduce mortality among severe HFMD cases. Given the fact that the HFMD epidemic in Guangxi is still serious and the coverage of EV-A71 vaccination is not very high, our findings are of great significance for the effective prevention and control of HFMD in Guangxi, and one of the priorities is to greatly improve the coverage of EV-A71 vaccination.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

HFMD:

Hand, foot and mouth disease

EV-A71:

Enterovirus A 71

References

  1. Huang CC, Liu CC, Chang YC, Yeh TF, et al. Neurologic complications in children with enterovirus 71 infection. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(13):936–42. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199909233411302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Xie YH, Chongsuvivatwong V, Tang Z, et al. Spatio-temporal clustering of hand, foot, and mouth disease at the county level in Guangxi, China. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(2):e88065. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088065.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen M, Ju Y, Chen M, et al. Epidemiological and genetic characteristics of EV71 in hand, foot, and mouth disease in Guangxi, southern China, from 2010 to 2015. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(12):e0188640. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188640.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Chang LY, Lin HY, Gau SS, et al. Enterovirus A71 neurologic complications and long-term sequelae. J Biomed Sci. 2019;26(1):57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12929-019-0552-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Li YP, Liang ZL, Gao Q, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a novel human Enterovirus 71 (EV71) vaccine: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase I clinical trial. Vaccine. 2012;30(22):3295–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.03.010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Li YP, Liang ZL, Xia JL, et al. Immunogenicity, safety, and immune persistence of a novel inactivated human enterovirus 71 vaccine: a phase II, Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Trial. J Infect Dis. 2014;209(1):46–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jit429.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhu F, Xu W, Xia J, et al. Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of an enterovirus 71 vaccine in China. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(9):818–28. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1304923.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Li R, Liu L, Mo Z, et al. An inactivated enterovirus 71 vaccine in healthy children. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(9):829–37. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1303224.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Li JX, Song YF, Wang L, et al. Two-year efficacy and immunogenicity of Sinovac Enterovirus 71 vaccine against hand, foot and mouth disease in children. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2016;15(1):129–37. https://doi.org/10.1586/14760584.2016.1096782.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang J, Jiang L, Zhang C, He W, Tan Y, Ning C. The changes in the epidemiology of hand, foot, and mouth disease after the introduction of the EV-A71 vaccine. Vaccine. 2021;39(25):3319–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.05.009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ministry of Health of the People’s Republic of China. Guide of diagnosis and Treatment for Hand, Foot, Mouth disease (2010 version). http://yzs.satcm.gov.cn/gongzuodongtai/2018-03-24/3073.html.

  12. Xing W, Liao Q, Viboud C, et al. Hand, foot, and mouth disease in China, 2008–12: an epidemiological study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14(4):308–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70342-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. The Ministry of Health of China. Guidelines for the Prevention and Control of Hand, Foot, and Mouth disease (2009 version). http://www.gov.cn/gzdt/2009-06/04/content_1332078.htm.

  14. The Ministry of Health of China. Guidelines for the Prevention and Control of Hand, Foot, and Mouth disease (2008 version).http://www.gov.cn/yjgl/2008-05/03/content_960347.htm.

  15. Peng D, Ma Y, Liu Y, Lv Q, Yin F. Epidemiological and aetiological characteristics of hand, foot, and mouth disease in Sichuan Province, China, 2011–2017. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):6117. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63274-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Sun Z, Zhang G, Guo P, et al. Epidemiological characterizations, pathogen spectrum and molecular characteristics of Coxsackievirus A16 from patients with HFMD in Yantai, Shandong, China between 2011 and 2015. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017;13(8):1831–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2017.1318233.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Huang J, Liao Q, Ooi MH, et al. Epidemiology of recurrent hand, foot and mouth disease, China, 2008–2015. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24(3):432–42. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2403.171303.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Moosazadeh M, Abedi G, Afshari M, Kheradmand E, et al. Prevalence of enterobius vermicularis among children in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osong Public. Health Res Perspect. 2017;8(2):108–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jiang FC, Yang F, Chen L, et al. Meteorological factors affect the hand, foot, and mouth disease epidemic in Qingdao, China, 2007–2014. Epidemiol Infect. 2016;144(11):2354–62. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268816000601.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jiang L, Wang J, Zhang C, et al. Effectiveness of enterovirus A71 vaccine in severe hand, foot, and mouth disease cases in Guangxi, China. Vaccine. 2020;38(7):1804–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.12.025.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhu J, Shi P, Zhou W, et al. Assessment of temperature-hand, foot, and mouth disease association and its variability across urban and rural populations in Wuxi, China: a distributed lag nonlinear analysis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020;103(5):2091–9. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.20-0329.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang J, Hu T, Sun D, et al. Epidemiological characteristics of hand, foot, and mouth disease in Shandong, China, 2009–2016. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):8900. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09196-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Ji H, Fan H, Ai J, et al. Neurocognitive deficits and sequelae following severe hand, foot, and mouth disease from 2009 to 2017, in JiangSu Province, China: a long-term follow-up study. Int J Infect Dis. 2022;115:245–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.11.026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu H, Song G, He N, et al. Spatial-temporal variation and risk factor analysis of hand, foot, and mouth disease in children under 5 years old in Guangxi, China. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1491. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7619-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Xu C, Zhang X, Xiao G. Spatiotemporal decomposition and risk determinants of hand, foot and mouth disease in Henan. China Sci Total Environ. 2019;657:509–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.039.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sun BJ, Chen HJ, Chen Y, et al. The risk factors of acquiring severe hand, foot, and mouth disease: a meta-analysis. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2018;2018:2751457. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2751457.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Qiu J, Lu XL, Liu X, et al. Derivation and validation of a mortality risk score for severe hand, foot and mouth disease in China. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):3371. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2751457.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Tao J, He XY, Shi Y, et al. Epidemiology of 45,616 suspect cases of hand, foot and mouth disease in Chongqing, China, 2011–2015. Sci Rep. 2017;7:45630. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep45630.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Li Y, Zhou YH, Cheng YB, et al. Effectiveness of EV-A71 vaccination in prevention of paediatric hand, foot, and mouth disease associated with EV-A71 virus infection requiring hospitalisation in Henan, China, 2017–18: a test-negative case-control study. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2019;3(10):697–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30185-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang XL, An ZJ, Huo D, et al. Enterovirus A71 vaccine effectiveness in preventing enterovirus A71 infection among medically-attended hand, foot, and mouth disease cases, Beijing. China Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2019;15(5):1183–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2019.1581539.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Du ZC, Huang Y, Bloom MS, et al. Assessing the vaccine effectiveness for hand, foot, and mouth disease in Guangzhou, China: a time-series analysis. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021;17(1):217–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2020.1763076.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang W, Song J, Wang J, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a national enterovirus 71 vaccination program in China. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11(9):e0005899. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005899.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Jiang HC, Zhang Z, Rao Q, et al. The epidemiological characteristics of enterovirus infection before and after the use of enterovirus 71 inactivated vaccine in Kunming, China. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2021;10(1):619–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2021.1899772.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. RECOVERY Collaborative Group, Horby P, Lim WS, et al. Dexamethasone in hospitalized patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(8):693–704. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2021436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Garcia-Beltran WF, Lam EC, Astudillo MG, et al. COVID-19-neutralizing antibodies predict disease severity and survival. Cell. 2021;184(2):476–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.12.015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang L, He W, Yu X, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 in elderly patients: Characteristics and prognostic factors based on 4-week follow-up. J Infect. 2020;80(6):639–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.019.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

All staffs, Institute of Acute Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Center for Disease Prevention and Control.

Funding

This work was supported by Guangxi Natural Science Foundation Programs (2017GXNSFAA198369).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YJP: Data analysis, Methodology, Writing-original draft, Writing-review and editing. WTH, YJ, CZ: Investigation, Data collection, Data entry, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing-review and editing. JW, LNJ: Investigation, Data collection and entry, Writing-review and editing. ZGZ: Data analysis, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing-review and editing. ZWL: Data collection and entry, writing-review and editing. PJP, YYL, HLW, HL: Formal analysis, Writing-review and editing. MMC: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing-review and editing, Supervision, Project Administration. LY: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing-review and editing. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Minmei Chen or Li Ye.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The data were extracted from the China National HFMD investigation databases and analyzed retrospectively and anonymously. Informed consent forms were also signed by patients' parents as they were interviewed. Written data use consent was also signed by patients during the investigation process. The study was approved by the Ethics and Human Subjects Committee (EHSC) of Guangxi CDC. And Investigation was performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have no competing/conflicting interests to declare in this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Comparison of demographic data of patients between vaccinated and not vaccinated group.

Additional file 2.

Case Questionnaire for severe or fatal Hand, foot, and mouth Disease.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peng, Y., He, W., Zheng, Z. et al. Factors related to the mortality risk of severe hand, foot, and mouth diseases (HFMD): a 5-year hospital-based survey in Guangxi, Southern China. BMC Infect Dis 23, 144 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08109-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08109-y

Keywords