Skip to main content

COVID-19 versus seasonal influenza: myocardial injury and prognostic importance

Abstract

Background

Acute myocardial injury is associated with poor prognosis in respiratory tract infections. We aimed to highlight the differences in prevalence of myocardial injury and its impact on prognosis in patients with COVID-19 compared to those with seasonal influenza.

Methods

This was a single-center prospective cohort study with a historical control group. 300 age-/sex-matched SARS-CoV-2 and seasonal influenza positive patients were enrolled. Myocardial injury was assessed by electrocardiogram (ECG), transthoracic echocardiography and biomarkers including high-sensitivity troponin-I. All patients were followed-up for 30 days after enrollment for all-cause mortalitiy, admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and mechanical ventilation.

Results

Right ventricular distress was more common in COVID-19 whereas pathological ECG findings and impaired left ventricular function were more prevalent among influenza patients. COVID-19 patients suffered from a higher percentage of hypertension and dyslipidaemia. Contrary to COVID-19, pericardial effusion at admission was associated with poor outcome in the influenza group. Severe course of disease and respiratory failure resulted in significantly higher rates of ICU treatment and mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 patients. Although distribution of myocardial injury was similar, significantly fewer cardiac catheterizations were performed in COVID-19 patients. However, number of cardiac catheterizations was low in both groups. Finally, 30-day mortality was significantly higher in COVID-19 compared to influenza patients.

Conclusions

In adults requiring hospitalization due to COVID-19 or seasonal influenza, cardiovascular risk factors and signs of myocardial distress differ significantly. Furthermore, cardiovascular comorbidities may impair prognosis in COVID-19 patients to a higher degree than in their influenza counterparts.

Peer Review reports

Background

Both influenza virus and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are RNA viruses and infect the respiratory epithelium. Aggravation of preexisting cardiovascular and respiratory comorbidities may favor a fatal outcome in influenza and SARS-CoV-2 infections [1, 2]. Extrapulmonary manifestations and cardiac involvement are common in patients hospitalized with seasonal influenza and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) [3, 4]. Furthermore, recent studies provide increasing evidence of advanced age and pre-existing cardiovascular diseases being associated with severe course of disease [2, 5]. A study by Covino et al. showed, however, that in patients aged ≥ 80 years and severe dementia were associated with poor outcome rather than increasing age itself. We and others have previously shown, that impaired myocardial function and elevated concentrations of cardiac biomarkers are associated with worse prognosis in COVID-19 6,7,8]. SARS-CoV-2 promotes a pro-coagulant environment by inducing platelet activation and inhibiting fibrinolysis 9,10,11,12], leading to thromboembolic complications including deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism and myocardial infarction.

In the current study, we compare the clinical course and outcomes in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and seasonal influenza. We focus on the incidence and possible pathomechanisms of myocardial injury and respiratory failure to provide further evidence in terms of risk factors and their implications for prognosis.

Methods

Study design and participants

This is a prospective study with a historical control cohort. Between March 2020 and January 2021, we enrolled 441 consecutive SARS-CoV-2 positive patients, that were admitted to the University Hospital of Tübingen, Germany. The historical control cohort consisted of 285 influenza patients admitted to the University Hospital of Tübingen between December 2015 and February 2019. Influenza patients were matched according to age and sex, resulting in two patient groups consisting of 150 individuals each.

Cardiovascular risk was assessed by electrocardiogram (ECG), transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin-I (hs-cTnI) levels. Myocardial injury was defined as elevated serum hs-cTnI level above 99th percentile according to the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction [13]. At our laboratory, the 99th percentile of hs-cTnI was 57 ng/mL for men and 37 ng/mL for women. Patients < 18 years were not enrolled in the current study.

Diagnosis of Influenza, SARS-CoV-2 infection and ARDS

Seasonal influenza and SARS-CoV-2 infection were diagnosed from nasopharyngeal secretions using a real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Severity of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was further graduated according to the Berlin Definition of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome [14].

Follow-up

All patients were followed-up for 30 days after study enrollment. The primary combined endpoint consisted of all-cause mortality and/or mechanical ventilation. All-cause mortality, mechanical ventilation or admission to intensive care unit (ICU) served as secondary endpoints. Follow-up was conducted via hospital discharge letters and telephone interviews.

Statistical analysis

SPSS version 26.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago IL) was applied for all statistical analyses. Normally and non-normally distributed data were compared with Student’s t-test and Mann–Whitney U test, respectively. Hence, values are either presented as mean ± standard deviation or median with 25th/75th percentile. Categorial variables were compared with cross tabulations and consecutive chi-squared tests. Correlations of non-normally distributed data were assessed using the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (rho). Kaplan–Meier curves including log rank tests were applied to compare intergroup survival. Where indicated, Cox-regression analyses were used to determine independent associations.

Results

Baseline characteristics and incidence rates per 100 person years, both stratified according to COVID-19 and influenza, are shown in Table 1. SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals displayed increased rates of arterial hypertension and dyslipidemia whereas significantly more influenza patients actively smoked.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics and (IR) per 100 person years (PY) stratified according to infectious disease

Patients suffering from influenza presented with lower left ventricular function (LVEF%) at study inclusion when compared to COVID-19. On the other hand, right ventricular (RV)-function was significantly worse in SARS-CoV-2 positive patients. Fittingly, systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (PAPsys) was higher and significant pulmonary as well as tricuspid valve regurgitation were more common in these individuals. Pericardial effusion (PE) was significantly associated with occurrence of the combined endpoint in influenza patients (p < 0.001), although prevalence of PE was low compared to substantially higher rates of PE in COVID-19 patients (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

A Distribution of cardiovascular risk factors, echo- and electrocardiographic parameters in COVID-19 vs influenza patients. B Prognosis in COVID-19 vs influenza patients

Pathologic ECG signs, especially left bundle branch block and ST segment depression were more prevalent in the influenza group.

Hs-cTnI was significantly elevated in influenza patients compared to SARS-CoV-2. Of note, 70 patients (37 COVID-19 vs 33 seasonal influenza, p = 0.273) in the overall cohort had an indication for cardiac catheterization based on significantly elevated hs-cTnI levels. Rate of cardiac catheterization was low in both groups, however, significantly more cardiac catheterizations were performed in influenza patients compared to COVID-19 (54.5% vs 16.2%, p = 0.011).

Rate of moderate to severe ARDS was significantly elevated in the COVID-19 group (Table 1).

Consequently, incidence rates of combined endpoint, mechanical ventilation, admission to ICU and all-cause mortality were significantly higher in COVID-19 patients compared to their influenza counterparts (Fig. 1). Of note, SARS-CoV-2 infection was independently associated with the combined endpoint, mechanical ventilation and admission to ICU, respectively. COVID-19 was the strongest independent predictor for all-cause mortality but failed to show statistical significance (Table 2).

Table 2 Cox Regression with epidemiological factors as independent and the combined endpoint, mechanical ventilation and all-cause mortality as dependent variables

Discussion

The major findings of the current study are: (1) Cardiovascular risk factors were more prevalent in hospitalized COVID-19 patients compared to influenza. (2) COVID-19 was associated with RV-distress while influenza patients presented with higher rates of impaired LV-function and ECG abnormalities. (3) A low number of patients with significantly elevated hs-cTnI levels received cardiac catherization, abandoning recommendations of the current guidelines on treatment of AMI. (4) In the current age- and sex-matched cohort, mechanical ventilation and ICU treatment were 6-times higher in the COVID-19 group and (5) SARS-CoV-2 patients had a threefold increased mortality risk when compared to individuals suffering from influenza.

Our findings confirm current evidence showing higher mortality and morbidity in SARS-CoV-2 compared to seasonal influenza 15,16,17,18,19,20]. We have previously shown that elevated PAPsys, most probably due to elevated pulmonary vascular resistance, caused by alveolar and vascular damage, leads to RV-distress in COVID-19. Consequently, elevated cardiac biomarkers are common findings in these patients [7, 8]. On the contrary, LV-dysfunction is more common in influenza, confirming the findings by Erden et al [21]. Although high prevalence of PE was observed in COVID-19 patients, it was only associated with adverse outcomes in influenza.

Numerous potential mechanisms leading to myocardial injury in seasonal influenza and SARS-CoV-2 infection are discussed to date. In addition to direct viral invasion, platelet hyperactivity, endothelial activation, oxygen supply and demand mismatch as well as enhanced atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability may be enhanced [22, 23]. Thus, myocardial injury due to thromboembolism may represent a cornerstone for poor prognosis in COVID-19. An increased alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient due to ventilation-perfusion mismatch or an altered alveolar diffusion barrier could be an early indicator for the necessity of oxygen supply and severe couse of disease in these patients and should be investigated in future studies, especially in contrast to influenza patients.

In the current study, cardiac catheterization was performed less frequently in COVID-19 patients compared to those suffering from influenza, which may have had an impact on increased mortality in COVID-19 patients. Thus, abandoning guideline-established treatment strategies highlights an important problem in infectious diseases.

Limitations

Our study is limited by the single center retrospective assessment of hospitalized patients with seasonal influenza. However, a low burden of influenza infections during the COVID-19 pandemic impedes a prospective approach with large numbers of cases. One of the limitations of the study is a moderate study population size. Furthermore, validation cohorts are needed to confirm the distinct associations of COVID-19 and influenza on prognosis. Therefore, we are currently cooperating with university hospitals in Germany to exchange our data on COVID-19 and influenza. A major objective of this collaboration is to establish validation cohorts for the discovered single-centre findings. Finally, vaccination status was also not recorded in the influenza group, so a vaccination-related bias for a milder course of disease would be conceivable.

Conclusion

In summary, clinical course, cardiac involvement and prognosis among hospitalized patients with seasonal influenza and COVID-19 differ considerably. In our opinion, acute and pre-existing cardiovascular disease affects COVID-19 patients in a far more drastic manner than their influenza counterparts, rendering stringent cardiovascular assessment and treatment by a COVID-19 heart team indispensable.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets analysed as part of the present study are available and can be provided by the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ARDS:

Acute respiratory distress syndrome

COVID-19:

Coronavirus disease 2019

ECG:

Electrocardiogram

hs-cTnI:

High-sensitivity cardiac troponin-I

ICU:

Intensive care unit

LV:

Left ventricle

RV:

Right ventricle

SARS-CoV-2:

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

PAPsys:

Systolic pulmonary arterial pressure

PE:

Pericardial effusion

TTE:

Transthoracic echocardiography

References

  1. Kash JC, Taubenberger JK. The role of viral, host, and secondary bacterial factors in influenza pathogenesis. Am J Pathol. 2015;185(6):1528–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Li B, Yang J, Zhao F, et al. Prevalence and impact of cardiovascular metabolic diseases on COVID-19 in China. Clin Res Cardiol. 2020;109(5):531–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wei JF, Huang FY, Xiong TY, et al. Acute myocardial injury is common in patients with COVID-19 and impairs their prognosis. Heart. 2020;106(15):1154–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gao C, Wang Y, Gu X, et al. Association between cardiac injury and mortality in hospitalized patients infected with avian influenza A (H7N9) virus. Crit Care Med. 2020;48(4):451–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Paules C, Subbarao K. Influenza. Lancet. 2017;390(10095):697–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mizera L, Rath D, Schoellmann A, et al. Deceleration capacity is associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome in COVID-19. Heart Lung. 2021;50(6):914–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rath D, Petersen-Uribe A, Avdiu A, et al. Impaired cardiac function is associated with mortality in patients with acute COVID-19 infection. Clin Res Cardiol. 2020;109(12):1491–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Petersen-Uribe A, Avdiu A, Martus P, et al. Impaired myocardial function is prognostic for severe respiratory failure in the course of COVID-19 infection. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8: 584108.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Althaus K, Marini I, Zlamal J, et al. Antibody-induced procoagulant platelets in severe COVID-19 infection. Blood. 2021;137(8):1061–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Langnau C, Rohlfing AK, Gekeler S, et al. Platelet activation and plasma levels of furin are associated with prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease and COVID-19. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2021;41(6):2080–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mueller KAL, Langnau C, Gunter M, et al. Numbers and phenotype of non-classical CD14dimCD16+ monocytes are predictors of adverse clinical outcome in patients with coronary artery disease and severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. Cardiovasc Res. 2021;117(1):224–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hammer S, Haberle H, Schlensak C, et al. Severe SARS-CoV-2 infection inhibits fibrinolysis leading to changes in viscoelastic properties of blood clot: a descriptive study of fibrinolysis in COVID-19. Thromb Haemost. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1400-6034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(18):2231–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Force ADT, Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA. 2012;307(23):2526–33.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cummings MJ, Baldwin MR, Abrams D, et al. Epidemiology, clinical course, and outcomes of critically ill adults with COVID-19 in New York City: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395(10239):1763–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Haudebourg AF, Perier F, Tuffet S, et al. Respiratory mechanics of COVID-19- versus non-COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;202(2):287–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Perez-Padilla R, de la Rosa-Zamboni D, Ponce de Leon S, et al. Pneumonia and respiratory failure from swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) in Mexico. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(7):680–689.

  18. Oliva A, Ceccarelli G, Borrazzo C, et al. Comparison of clinical features and outcomes in COVID-19 and influenza pneumonia patients requiring intensive care unit admission. Infection. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-021-01624-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Piroth L, Cottenet J, Mariet AS, et al. Comparison of the characteristics, morbidity, and mortality of COVID-19 and seasonal influenza: a nationwide, population-based retrospective cohort study. Lancet Respir Med. 2021;9(3):251–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Auvinen R, Nohynek H, Syrjanen R, et al. Comparison of the clinical characteristics and outcomes of hospitalized adult COVID-19 and influenza patients - a prospective observational study. Infect Dis (Lond). 2021;53(2):111–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Erden I, Erden EC, Ozhan H, et al. Echocardiographic manifestations of pandemic 2009 (H1N1) influenza a virus infection. J Infect. 2010;61(1):60–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lippi G, Sanchis-Gomar F. Cardiac troponin elevation in patients with influenza virus infections. Biomed J. 2021;44(2):183–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Imazio M, Klingel K, Kindermann I, et al. COVID-19 pandemic and troponin: indirect myocardial injury, myocardial inflammation or myocarditis? Heart. 2020;106(15):1127–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects. Cardiovasc Res. 1997;35(1):2–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the member states relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use. Med Etika Bioet. 2002;9(1–2):12–19.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This project was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) KFO-274–Project number 190538538, by the German Research Foundation (DFG)–Project number 374031971–TRR 240, and funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG)–Project number 335549539–GRK2381. The funder had no influence on the trial including data collection, analysis, writing of the manuscript or submission process. Finally, we acknowledge support by Open Access Publishing Fund of University of Tübingen.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors critically revised the manuscript and approved the manuscript. LM: Drafting of the manuscript, data collection, statistical analysis, study conception. MZ: Data collection, critical revision. JG: Data collection, statistical analysis. ÁPU: Data collection, statistical analysis. KM: Data collection, critical revision. MG: Drafting of the manuscript, data collection, statistical analysis. SG: Critical revision, study conception. DR: Drafting of the manuscript, study conception and assessment of data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dominik Rath.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Eberhard-Karls-University and of the University Hospital Tübingen (committee’s reference number 238/2018BO2) and complies with the declaration of Helsinki and the good clinical practice guidelines [24, 25]. Written informed consent was obtained wherever possible. We did not receive written informed consent from severely ill or deceased COVID-19 and Influenza patients. This circumstance was explicitly discussed with our local ethics committee. We have the permission to investigate these data. Furthermore, national regulations allow to analyze the data of these patients (Datenschutzrecht § 13 Landesdatenschutzgesetz).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mizera, L., Zdanyte, M., Gernert, J. et al. COVID-19 versus seasonal influenza: myocardial injury and prognostic importance. BMC Infect Dis 22, 539 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07488-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07488-y

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • Prognosis
  • Seasonal influenza
  • Cardiovascular disease