Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Overexpression of activated protein C hampers bacterial dissemination during pneumococcal pneumonia

  • Johannes Daan de Boer1, 2,
  • Liesbeth M Kager1, 2, 9Email author,
  • Joris JTH Roelofs4,
  • Joost CM Meijers5, 6,
  • Onno J de Boer4,
  • Hartmut Weiler7,
  • Berend Isermann8,
  • Cornelis van ’t Veer1, 2 and
  • Tom van der Poll1, 2, 3
BMC Infectious Diseases201414:559

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-014-0559-3

Received: 30 June 2014

Accepted: 14 October 2014

Published: 4 November 2014

Abstract

Background

During pneumonia, inflammation and coagulation are activated as part of anti-bacterial host defense. Activated protein C (APC) has anticoagulant and anti-inflammatory properties and until recently was a registered drug for the treatment of severe sepsis. Streptococcus (S.) pneumoniae is the most common causative pathogen in community-acquired pneumonia.

Methods

We aimed to investigate the effect of high APC levels during experimental pneumococcal pneumonia. Wild type (WT) and APC overexpressing (APChigh)-mice were intranasally infected with S. pneumoniae and sacrificed after 6, 24 or 48 hours, or followed in a survival study.

Results

In comparison to WT mice, APChigh-mice showed decreased bacterial dissemination to liver and spleen, while no differences in bacterial loads were detected at the primary site of infection. Although no differences in the extent of lung histopathology were seen, APChigh-mice showed a significantly decreased recruitment of neutrophils into lung tissue and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Activation of coagulation was not altered in APChigh-mice. No differences in survival were observed between WT and APChigh-mice (P =0.06).

Conclusion

APC overexpression improves host defense during experimental pneumococcal pneumonia. This knowledge may add to a better understanding of the regulation of the inflammatory and procoagulant responses during severe Gram-positive pneumonia.

Keywords

Pneumonia Inflammation Coagulation Activated protein C Neutrophils

Background

The most common cause of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is infection with the pathogen Streptococcus (S.) pneumoniae[1],[2]. CAP often leads to severe sepsis and a recent study in sepsis patients showed that 35.6% of the cases were caused by severe CAP [3]. Pneumonia caused by S. pneumoniae and related pneumococcal sepsis are among the most common causes of death in the Western world rendering them a serious threat to health [4] and stressing the importance of understanding host defense mechanisms during this disease.

Over the last years many studies have demonstrated that the host response during severe (pneumococcal) pneumonia and sepsis consists of a strong pro-inflammatory response together with increased procoagulant activity, blunted anticoagulant mechanisms and suppression of the fibrinolytic system [2],[5],[6]. The interplay between inflammation and blood coagulation is considered to be an essential part of the host defense against infectious agents, a concept recently referred to as `immunothrombosis’ [7]. Activated protein C (APC) serves as one of the main inhibitors of the coagulation system via its capacity to inactivate coagulation factors Va and VIIIa. Additionally, in the last decade APC has gained much interest for its cytoprotective, anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic and vascular barrier-protective properties, which are largely mediated by the protease activated receptor-1 (PAR1) and the endothelial PC receptor (EPCR) [8],[9]. Much research has been done on the effect and role of APC during (pneumo)sepsis. In patients with severe pneumonia and sepsis, a correlation was observed between low PC and APC levels and the occurrence of organ dysfunction and adverse outcome, pointing to a protective role for APC [10]-[12]. Moreover, in the PROWESS study treatment of severe sepsis patients with intravenous recombinant human APC (rhAPC) reduced mortality [13] and patients with sepsis caused by S. pneumoniae pneumonia were among those with the largest benefit from rhAPC treatment [14],[15]. Despite these positive results, post-marketing studies failed to show similar protective effects of APC [16] and a recently completed confirmatory trial in septic shock patients did not show any benefit from APC treatment [17], leading to the withdrawal of this compound from the market [18].

Our laboratory recently showed protective effects of APC during pneumococcal pneumonia. Therapeutic administration of recombinant murine APC (rmAPC) attenuated pulmonary coagulopathy and improved survival during infection with S. pneumoniae[19], whereas early administration of rmAPC also had anti-inflammatory effects as reflected by reduced levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in lungs of rmAPC-treated mice [20]. A possible limitation of these studies is the variability of rmAPC concentrations, due to its short half-live and the fact that in these studies rmAPC was administered only every 8 hours. To mimic the clinical situation more reliably, it would be better to administer rmAPC via continuous intravenous infusion. However, this is difficult to achieve in freely moving mice. Therefore, in the present study we used mice with sustained elevated levels of APC due to endogenous overexpression of hyperactivatable PC (APChigh-mice [21]) and investigated the effects of elevated APC levels in the same model of pneumococcal pneumonia [19],[20]. We here show that sustained elevated levels of APC exert protective effects during pneumococcal pneumonia, as evidenced by decreased bacterial dissemination to distant body sites and decreased influx of inflammatory cells to the lungs, especially neutrophils.

Methods

Mice

Pathogen-free 10-week old female wild type (WT) C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Charles River (Maastricht, The Netherlands) and maintained in cages with 3–6 mice at the animal care facility of the Academic Medical Center (University of Amsterdam), according to national guidelines with free access to food and water. APChigh-mice on a C57BL/6 genetic background were generated as described [21] and bred in the animal facility of the Academic Medical Center in Amsterdam. WT and APChigh-mice were housed separately. Wellfare of the mice during the experiment was checked twice daily. As reported earlier, transgenic APChigh mice appear grossly normal, reproduce normally and do not show any signs of spontaneous bleeding [21]. Endogenous overexpression of APC in APChigh mice has been confirmed in previous reports [21] as well as in our own laboratory [22]. Per time-point two groups of 8 mice were compared (WT and APChigh). The number of 8 mice per group was carefully chosen as with this number the Wilcoxon (Mann–Whitney) rank test gives a power of 80% and a chance of 0.904 that the observed mean in one group is lower than in the other group, demonstrated with a two-sided level of significance of 0.05. Moreover, this group size provided us statistical significance for differences we consider clinically relevant.

Ethics statement

Mice studies were carried out under the guidance of the Animal Research Institute of the Academical Medical Center in Amsterdam (ARIA). All animals were maintained at the animal care facility of the Academic Medical Center (University of Amsterdam), with free access to food and water, according to National Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, which are based on the National Experiments on Animals Act (Wet op de Dierproeven (WOD)) and the Experiments on Animals Decree (Dierproevenbesluit), under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Public Health, Welfare and Sports, the Netherlands. The Committee of Animal Care and Use (Dier Experimenten Commissie, DEC) of the University of Amsterdam approved all experiments (Permit number DIX100121-101787).

Experimental infection and determination of bacterial growth

Pneumonia was induced by intranasal inoculation of all mice at the same time point of 5*104 colony forming units (CFU) in 50 μl 0.9% NaCl of S. pneumoniae serotype 3 (ATCC strain 6303; American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD) as previously described [19],[20]. Mice were sacrificed after 6, 24 or 48 hours (n = 8/group) and survival studies (n =16/group for WT mice and 12/group for APChigh-mice) were performed in which mortality was assessed every 6 hours. Sample harvesting, processing and determination of bacterial growth were done as described [19],[20]. Briefly, mice were sacrificed under intraperitoneal anesthesia containing ketamin (Eurovet Animal Health, Bladel, The Netherlands) and medetomidin (Pfizer Animal Health Care, Capelle aan den IJssel, The Netherlands). Blood was drawn from the vena cava inferior into syringes containing sodium citrate (4:1 vol/vol) and stored on ice. Left lungs, spleen and liver were harvested, weighed and homogenized at 4°C in 4 volumes of sterile saline using a tissue homogenizer (Pro200, Pro Scientific Inc., Oxford, CT) and processed as described below. CFU were determined from serial dilutions of organ homogenates and blood plated on blood agar plates and incubated at 37°C 5% CO2 for 20 h before colonies were counted. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was harvested by selectively cannulation of the right main bronchus with a 22-gauge Abbocath-T catheter (Abott, Sligo, Ireland) followed by unilateral lavage of the right lung with three 300 μl aliquots of sterile phosphate-buffered saline. Harvested cells were kept on ice until analysis.

Assays

Lung homogenates were diluted 1:2 in lysis buffer containing 300 mM NaCl, 30 mM Tris, 2 mM MgCl2, 2 mM CaCl2, 1% Triton X-100 and protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Indianapolis, IN) and incubated at 4°C for 30 min and centrifuged at 680 g at 4°C for 10 min. Lung homogenates were stored at −20°C until analysis. Blood was centrifuged at 600 g and plasma was snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C until analysis. Interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10, IL-12p70, interferon (IFN)-γ and monocyte-chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 were measured by cytometric bead array (CBA) multiplex assay (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) in accordance with the manufacturers’ recommendations. Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α; R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN), keratinocyte-derived chemokine (KC; R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN) and thrombin-antithrombin complexes (TATc; Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Marburg, Germany) were measured with commercially available ELISA kits according to the manufacturers’ instructions.

Histology and immunohistochemistry

Paraffin-embedded 4 μm lung sections were stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and analyzed for inflammation and tissue damage, as described previously [19],[20]. All slides were scored by an experienced histopathologist blinded for experimental groups for the following parameters: bronchitis, interstitial inflammation, edema, endothelialitis, pleuritis and thrombus formation. All parameters were rated separately from 0 (condition absent) to 4 (most severe condition). The total histopathology score was expressed as the sum of the scores of the individual parameters, with a maximum of 24. Staining for granulocytes, using fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled rat-anti-mouse Ly-6G mAb (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA) was performed as described previously [22],[23]. All slides were slightly counterstained with methylgreen. The total tissue area of Ly-6G stained slides was scanned with a slide scanner (Olympus dotSlide, Tokyo, Japan) and the obtained scans were exported in TIFF format for digital image analysis. The digital images were analyzed with ImageJ (version 2006.02.01, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) and the immunopositive (Ly6G+) area calculated from an average of 10 images per lung was expressed as the percentage of the total lung surface area.

Cell counts and differentials

Freshly harvested BALF-cells were counted using an automatic haemocytometer (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA). Differential counts were performed on cytospins stained with a modified Giemsa stain (Diff-Quick, Dade Behring, Düdingen, Switzerland).

Statistical analysis

All data are expressed as box and whisker plots showing the smallest observation, lower quartile, median, upper quartile and largest observation. Comparisons between groups were performed using a Mann–Whitney U test. For survival studies Kaplan-Meier analyses followed by log rank test were performed. All analyses were done using GraphPad Prism version 5.01 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

APC-overexpression hampers bacterial dissemination

We previously showed that APChigh-mice have markedly increased levels of APC in various organs as was measured in plasma, lung-, kidney-, liver-, and spleen homogenates of uninfected APChigh-mice [22]. To investigate whether overexpression of APC would impact on bacterial growth, we infected WT and APChigh-mice with 5*104 CFU of S. pneumoniae and sacrificed them after 6, 24 or 48 hours to determine bacterial loads in lungs (the primary site of infection), blood, liver and spleen homogenates (to evaluate the extent of dissemination) (Figure 1). No differences in bacterial growth were seen in the lungs (Figure 1A) or blood (Figure 1B) between WT and APChigh-mice. However, relative to WT mice, APChigh-mice showed markedly decreased bacterial loads 24 and 48 hours after infection in both liver (Figure 1C; P <0.05 for both time points) and spleen homogenates (Figure 1D; P <0.01 for both time points). These data indicate that overexpression of APC hampers bacterial dissemination during S. pneumoniae-induced pneumonia.
Figure 1

APC-overexpression is associated with reduced bacterial dissemination . Mice were intranasally inoculated with 5*104 CFU of S. pneumoniae and sacrificed after 6, 24 or 48 hours. Bacterial loads were determined in lung homogenates (A), blood (B), liver homogenates (C) and spleen homogenates (D). Data are expressed as box and whisker plots showing the smallest observation, lower quartile, median, upper quartile and largest observation. Grey boxes represent WT mice, white boxes represent APChigh-mice (n =8 mice per group for each time point). *P <0.05 and **P <0.01 for the difference between WT and APChigh-mice (Mann–Whitney U test). BD below detection limits.

APC-overexpression does not impact on lung pathology during pneumococcal pneumonia but is associated with decreased neutrophil influx

Our model of pneumococcal pneumonia is associated with profound lung pathology [19],[20],[24]. Both WT and APChigh-mice infected with S. pneumoniae showed inflammatory infiltrates in the lungs characterized by bronchitis, interstitial inflammation, oedema, endothelialitis, pleuritis and thrombus formation (Figure 2A-C). However, APC-overexpression did not induce differences in lung pathology during infection between WT and APChigh-mice (Figure 2A). Neutrophils contribute to host defense against S. pneumoniae[19],[20]. In order to investigate neutrophil influx in our model we measured percentage of Ly-6G staining in infected lung tissue (Figure 2D-F). Twenty-four hours after infection, APChigh-mice displayed significantly decreased neutrophil numbers in their lungs as compared to WT mice (P <0.05; Figure 2D-F). These data were confirmed by decreased numbers of total cell counts in BALF in APChigh-mice compared to WT mice (P <0.01; Figure 2G), for which a decrease in the number of neutrophils in APChigh-mice mainly was responsible (P <0.01; Figure 2H). BALF macrophage and lymphocyte numbers did not differ between APChigh and WT mice (Figure 2I-J).
Figure 2

APC-overexpression does not impact on lung pathology but attenuates neutrophil influx into the lungs . Histology scores were similar in WT and APChigh-mice 6, 24 and 48 hours post-infection with 5*104 CFU of S. pneumoniae (A). Representative photographs of WT (B) and APChigh-mice (C) (H&E staining, original magnification x100) 48 hours post-infection. Decreased granulocyte influx as measured by Ly-6G expression in APChigh-mice infected with S. pneumoniae, 24 hours after infection (D). Representative photographs of Ly-6G immunostaining (original magnification x100) for granulocytes of WT (E) and APChigh-mice (F), 24 hours post-infection. APChigh-mice showed decreased numbers of total cell counts in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) compared to WT mice (G), which was caused by a decreased influx of neutrophils (H). No differences in influx of macrophages (I) and lymphocytes (J) were found. Data are expressed as box and whisker plots showing the smallest observation, lower quartile, median, upper quartile and largest observation. Numbers of Ly-6G + granulocytes are expressed as the percentage of the total lung surface area. Neutrophils, macrophages and lymphocytes are expressed as absolute numbers. Grey boxes represent WT mice, white boxes represent APChigh-mice (n =8 mice per group for each time point). *P <0.05 and **P <0.01 for WT versus APChigh-mice (Mann–Whitney U test).

Limited differences between WT and APChigh-mice in cytokine production

Since cytokines are important regulators of the host immune response during pneumococcal pneumonia [1],[2] we measured levels of the following cytokines in lung homogenates and plasma: TNF-α, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12p70, IFN-γ, MCP-1 and KC (Table 1). The lung and plasma levels of these mediators did not differ between mouse strains at 6, 24 or 48 hours after infection.
Table 1

Cytokine concentrations in lung homogenates and plasma of WT and APC high -mice during pneumococcal pneumonia

 

Lung homogenates

all [pg/ml]

WT

APChigh

WT

APChigh

WT

APChigh

 

T = 6

T = 24

T = 48

TNF-α

8.6

7.6

249

284

217

56

(6.1-9.8)

(4.8-14)

(164–318)

(182–549)

(19–821)

(11–290)

IL-6

21

31

1218

1429

1317

694

(17–22)

(16–51)

(474–1522)

(1078–1992)

(650–1722)

(104–1449)

IL-10

16

24

17

12

20

19

(15–22)

(22–35)

(11–24)

(7.6-21)

(11–33)

(16–28)

IL-12p70

BD

BD

13

17

BD

BD

  

(5.4-21)

(11–49)

  

IFN-γ

BD

BD

12

19

14

13

  

(8.1-19)

(8.4-26)

(4.3-32)

(5.4-41)

MCP-1

254

210

2891

3239

4913

3056

(229–274)

(187–247)

(1935–3561)

(2507–4730)

(2901–5574)

(884–5958)

KC

255

221

4809

6838

8338

6993

(215–317)

(66–347)

(3548–7702)

(5165–9143)

(4703–10317)

(4421–8496)

KC (BALF)

117

102

255

277

231

236

(106–131)

(99–127)

(241–347)

(252–306)

(213–343)

(194–260)

 

Plasma

 

WT

APC high

WT

APC high

WT

APC high

 

T = 6

T = 24

T = 48

TNF-α

15

16

42

37

92

43

(13–20)

(13–18)

(36–53)

(29–46)

(48–111)

(23–74)

IL-6

5.1

3.9

331

263

795

223

(2.5-7.4)

(2.9-22)

(232–442)

(213–354)

(183–881)

(111–602)

IL-10

BD

BD

BD

BD

BD

BD

IL-12p70

7.8

10

11

27

6.9

6.0

(5.2-9.8)

(6.4-13)

(10–16)

(14–40)

(3.5-17)

(3.9-8.4)

IFN-γ

2.0

1.4

24

38

43

29

(1.9-2.1)

(1.3-6.7)

(14–41)

(23–55)

(30–69)

(8.2-82)

MCP-1

26

37

138

95

590

240

(26–41)

(35–42)

(71–196)

(83–149)

(402–786)

(138–786)

Lung and plasma cytokine levels after intranasal infection with 5*105 CFU of S. pneumoniae. Wild type (WT) and APChigh-mice were sacrificed 6, 24 or 48 hours after infection. Data are expressed as median (interquartile range) of n =8 mice per group per time point. BALF broncho-alveolar lavage fluid, BD below detection limits, TNF-α tumor necrosis factor-α, IL interleukin, IFN-γ interferon-γ, KC keratinocyte-derived chemokine, MCP-1 monocyte chemotactic protein.

Overexpression of APC does not inhibit coagulation activation

To obtain insight into the anticoagulant potential of overexpression of APC we measured the levels of TATc, a parameter of coagulation-induction. TATc was measured in in lung homogenates and plasma of WT and APChigh-mice 6 and 48 hours after inoculation with S. pneumoniae (Figure 3). No differences in TATc levels between WT and APChigh-mice were observed either in the pulmonary or the systemic compartment.
Figure 3

APC high -mice show an unaltered procoagulant response. Mice were infected intranasally with 5*104 CFU of S. pneumoniae. After 6 and 48 hours levels of TATc were measured in lung homogenates (A) and plasma (B) of WT and APChigh-mice. No differences were seen between WT and APChigh-mice. Grey boxes represent WT mice, white boxes represent APChigh-mice (n =8 mice per group for each time point). *P <0.05 for WT versus APChigh-mice (Mann–Whitney U test). NEM not enough material for analysis.

APChigh-mice show a trend towards a better survival during experimental pneumococcal pneumonia

We have previously shown that in our model of pneumococcal pneumonia is associated with a high mortality [19]. To investigate whether overexpression of APC impacts mortality during pneumococcal pneumonia we intranasally infected WT and APChigh-mice with 5*104 CFU of S. pneumoniae and observed them during the following 8 days (Figure 4). In line with the decreased bacterial burdens observed in liver and spleen homogenates, and the less prominent cellular influx in the lung, APChigh-mice showed a trend towards a better survival when compared to WT mice (P =0.06).
Figure 4

Survival. APChigh-mice show a trend towards a delayed mortality during pneumococcal pneumonia. Wild type (WT) (n =16) and APChigh-mice (n =12) were infected intranasally with 5*104 CFU of S. pneumoniae and mortality was assessed every 6 hours, Comparison between groups was done by using Kaplan-Meier analysis followed by log rank tests.

Discussion

The potential of the PC system as a pharmaceutical target in sepsis remains a topic of debate despite the retraction of recombinant human APC from the market due to efficacy concerns [13],[17],[18],[25]-[27]. In the pulmonary compartment, increased coagulation activation during pneumonia may be advantageous for the host by preventing potential lethal bleeding from destructed lung tissue and by providing a platform to encounter, entrap and kill invading pathogens [7]. In contrast, inflammation-induced coagulation activation can also produce collateral damage and be detrimental by interfering with normal organ physiology and hampering a balanced immune response [5],[6],[28]. APC has both anticoagulant and anti-inflammatory effects [8],[9] and thereby can be expected to influence the host response during infection [8],[9]. Our goal was to address the impact of sustained elevated levels of APC in a clinically relevant pneumonia model by using APChigh-mice with high endogenous hyperactivatable PC expression [21].

The results of our study show that in S. pneumoniae-induced pneumonia APChigh-mice have an improved host defense as reflected by decreased dissemination of bacteria to distant organs and an attenuated influx of neutrophils into the lungs. In the `PROWESS’ human sepsis trial, rhAPC treatment was especially beneficial in the sepsis group with pneumonia [13],[14]. Therefore, we focused this and our previous studies [19],[20] on effects of APC in the pulmonary compartment and CAP, with S. pneumoniae as the clinically most relevant pathogen [1],[2]. The APChigh-mice used in this study overexpress hyperactivatable human PC [21]. In this respect, generation of APC is dependent on thrombin, yet less dependent on thrombomodulin (which is downregulated in sepsis), thereby conferring some “clot-specificity”. Therefore, overexpression in APChigh-mice is different from infusing recombinant APC per se. Nevertheless, because there is constitutive thrombin generation, the animals show constitutively elevated APC at a concentration that is very similar to the dosing used in clinical trials (45 ng/ml steady state) [29].

Likewise, inhibition of neutrophil attraction by APC was shown in other human and animal studies in different inflammatory settings [30]-[34]. Treatment with rhAPC in healthy volunteers challenged with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) by bronchoscopy resulted in decreased neutrophil migration [35]. In a nice series of experiments involving both in vivo (LPS challenge in mice) and in vitro experiments (neutrophil agarose migration assay) APC was shown to desensitize neutrophils for chemotaxis in an integrin-dependent manner, without affecting neutrophil function, cytokine production or apoptosis [30]. Here, we observed a similar specific inhibitory effect of APC affecting the influx of neutrophils when using live bacteria instead of LPS. This effect of APC was observed at 24 hours after inoculation of S. pneumoniae, while at the 48-hour time point neutrophil numbers in lungs and KC levels in lung homogenates and BALF were similar in both mouse strains, suggesting that during fulminant pneumonia the inhibitory effect of APC on neutrophil recruitment is overruled by the strong proinflammatory stimulus provided by high bacterial loads. We did not observe differences in cytokine levels between APChigh and WT mice, suggestive of similar chemotactic gradients. In accordance, APC has been shown to inhibit IL-8 directed [33] and integrin-mediated neutrophil migration [30]. In addition, a recent study showed that APC might control inflammation via leukocyte adhesion in a RAGE-dependent way [36]. Of note, the decreased amount of pulmonary neutrophils did not result in increased local CFU counts, suggesting that the number of neutrophils was still adequate to cope with the pneumococci in the lungs.

Although bacterial loads were comparable at the primary site of infection, APChigh-mice had lower burdens of pneumococci in liver and spleen. The endothelium is the anatomical barrier that pathogens need to cross before dissemination from the lungs to the systemic compartment and distant organs. The integrity of the endothelium is tightly regulated, in which sphingosin-1-phosphatase (S1P) plays an important part [37]. APC is able to exert S1P agonistic effects and thereby to improve endothelial barrier function [38], which may in part explain the reduced dissemination of S. pneumoniae from the lungs of APChigh-mice. Of note, APChigh-mice had higher bacterial loads in liver and spleen when compared with WT mice in spite of similar bacterial counts in blood. Conceivable explanations for this discrepancy include the possibility that the small amount of blood plated for culture (50 μl) yields less representative results when compared with whole organ homogenates, due to intermittent bacterial spillage to the circulation from different organs, and/or the option that high APC levels have more profound effects on bacterial growth in the cellular environment of intact organs such as the liver and spleen. Clearly, high APC levels primarily affected bacterial dissemination, considering that APChigh and WT mice had similar bacterial burdens at the primary site of infection.

Remarkably, APChigh-mice did not show attenuated coagulation compared to WT mice. In our previous studies using this model of pneumococcal pneumonia administration of rmAPC did exert anticoagulant effects [19],[20]. Notably, the high intraperitoneal APC doses (125 μg every 8 hours) used in these earlier investigations resulted in APC levels one hour post-injection that were almost 10-fold higher than the APC levels measured in APChigh-mice [19],[20],[22]. In addition, the APC expressed in APChigh-mice is described to have 35% less anticoagulant effect in vitro. Together, these facts may at least in part explain the lack of a clear anticoagulant effect in APChigh-mice with pneumococcal pneumonia. Nonetheless, in spite of this APChigh-mice displayed a clear protective phenotype, suggesting that the cytoprotective effects of APC were mainly responsible here for.

The current results contrast with our recent investigation in which we studied APChigh-mice in severe Gram-negative pneumonia derived sepsis caused by Burkholderia pseudomallei, the causative agent of melioidosis [22]. APChigh-mice demonstrated enhanced susceptibility to B. pseudomallei infection compared with WT mice as indicated by a strongly increased mortality accompanied by enhanced bacterial loads in the lungs, blood, and distant organs 48 hours after infection [22]. Although a clear explanation for these different results is lacking, clearly, the models and pathogens used differ considerably, which is very well documented in a wide variety of experimental settings. In fact, this is an interesting point which may, if true in the human situation, might in part explain the overall poor efficacy of rhAPC in sepsis trials.

Our study is limited by the fact that we studied only one infectious dose of a serotype 3 pneumococcus. In the limited experience we have with lower doses of this highly virulent bacterial strain the onset of disease was somewhat postponed without clear differences in the eventual outcome. Nonetheless, further studies are required to establish the phenotype of APChigh-mice after infection with other doses of the S. pneumoniae strain used here, and with other pneumococcal serotypes. In addition, APChigh-mice do not adequately mimic the clinical scenario of continuous intravenous APC infusion started at the time of already established infection, a setting difficult to accomplish in freely moving mice. As such, our data cannot be directly extrapolated to the effect of high APC levels achieved at various durations after induction of pneumonia. The current results, obtained with mice exposed to sustained high APC levels, confirm and extend our earlier results obtained with repeated administration of bolus doses of recombinant APC during pneumococcal pneumonia, resulting in a more artificial situation of highly variable APC concentrations due to the short half-life of this protein [19],[20].

Conclusions

In summary, this study shows that elevated formation of human APC improves host defense during experimental pneumococcal pneumonia with respect to reduced bacterial dissemination and mitigated neutrophil influx in the lungs. Although recombinant APC has been withdrawn from the market these results support previous preclinical data showing beneficial effects of APC in experimental models of sepsis and pneumonia.

Abbreviations

APC: 

Activated protein C

BALF: 

Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid

CAP: 

Community-acquired pneumonia

CBA: 

Cytometric bead array multiplex assay

CFU: 

Colony forming units

EPCR: 

Endothelial protein C receptor

H&E: 

Haematoxylin and eosin

IFN-γ: 

Interferon-γ

IL: 

Interleukin

KC: 

Keratinocyte-derived chemokine

LPS: 

Lipopolysaccharide

MCP-1: 

Monocyte-chemoattractant protein-1

PAR-1: 

Protease activated receptor-1

PC: 

Protein C

rmAPC: 

recombinant murine activated protein C

rhAPC: 

recombinant human activated protein C

S1P: 

Sphingosin-1-phosphatase

S. pneumoniae

Streptococcus pneumonia

TATc: 

Thrombin-antithrombin complexes

TNF-α: 

Tumor necrosis factor-α

WT: 

Wild type

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank M. ten Brink and J. B. Daalhuisen for their expert technical assistance during the animal experiments and R. de Beer for performing histopathological and immunohistochemical stainings.

Funding statement

Research was supported by research grants of the Netherlands Asthma Foundation (JDdB; project number 3.2.08.009), ZonMW (LMK, grant number: 92003504) and the Stichting BeGeTu (LMK).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Center for Infection and Immunity Amsterdam (CINIMA), Academic Medical Center
(2)
Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine (CEMM), Academic Medical Center
(3)
Division of Internal Medicine, Academic Medical Center
(4)
Department of Pathology, Academic Medical Center
(5)
Department of Experimental Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center
(6)
Department Plasma Proteins, Sanquin
(7)
Blood Research Institute, Blood Center of Wisconsin
(8)
Department of Clinical Chemistry and Pathobiochemistry, Otto-von-Guericke University
(9)
Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine (CEMM), Center for Infection and Immunity Amsterdam (CINIMA), Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam

References

  1. Mizgerd JP: Acute lower respiratory tract infection. N Engl J Med. 2008, 358: 716-727. 10.1056/NEJMra074111.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. van der Poll T, Opal SM: Pathogenesis, treatment, and prevention of pneumococcal pneumonia. Lancet. 2009, 374: 1543-1556. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61114-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Laterre PF, Garber G, Levy H, Wunderink R, Kinasewitz GT, Sollet JP, Maki DG, Bates B, Yan SC, Dhainaut JF: Severe community-acquired pneumonia as a cause of severe sepsis: data from the PROWESS study. Crit Care Med. 2005, 33: 952-961. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000162381.24074.D7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartlett JG, Dowell SF, Mandell LA, File TM, Musher DM, Fine MJ: Practice guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2000, 31: 347-382. 10.1086/313954.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Delvaeye M, Conway EM: Coagulation and innate immune responses: can we view them separately?. Blood. 2009, 114: 2367-2374. 10.1182/blood-2009-05-199208.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Levi M, van der Poll T: Inflammation and coagulation. Crit Care Med. 2010, 38: S26-S34. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181c98d21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Engelmann B, Massberg S: Thrombosis as an intravascular effector of innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013, 13: 34-45. 10.1038/nri3345.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Esmon CT: Inflammation and the activated protein C anticoagulant pathway. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2006, 32 (Suppl 1): 49-60. 10.1055/s-2006-939554.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Mosnier LO, Zlokovic BV, Griffin JH: The cytoprotective protein C pathway. Blood. 2007, 109: 3161-3172. 10.1182/blood-2006-09-003004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Fisher CJ, Yan SB: Protein C levels as a prognostic indicator of outcome in sepsis and related diseases. Crit Care Med. 2000, 28: S49-S56. 10.1097/00003246-200009001-00011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Shaw AD, Vail GM, Haney DJ, Xie J, Williams MD: Severe protein C deficiency is associated with organ dysfunction in patients with severe sepsis. J Crit Care. 2011, 26: 539-545. 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.05.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Choi G, Schultz MJ, Levi M, van der Poll T, Millo JL, Garrard CS: Protein C in pneumonia. Thorax. 2005, 60: 705-706. 10.1136/thx.2004.037341.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Bernard GR, Vincent JL, Laterre PF, LaRosa SP, Dhainaut JF, Lopez-Rodriguez A, Steingrub JS, Garber GE, Helterbrand JD, Ely EW, Fisher CJ: Efficacy and safety of recombinant human activated protein C for severe sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2001, 344: 699-709. 10.1056/NEJM200103083441001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ely EW, Laterre PF, Angus DC, Helterbrand JD, Levy H, Dhainaut JF, Vincent JL, Macias WL, Bernard GR: Drotrecogin alfa (activated) administration across clinically important subgroups of patients with severe sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2003, 31: 12-19. 10.1097/00003246-200301000-00002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Opal SM, Garber GE, LaRosa SP, Maki DG, Freebairn RC, Kinasewitz GT, Dhainaut JF, Yan SB, Williams MD, Graham DE, Nelson DR, Levy H, Bernard GR: Systemic host responses in severe sepsis analyzed by causative microorganism and treatment effects of drotrecogin alfa (activated). Clin Infect Dis. 2003, 37: 50-58. 10.1086/375593.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Marti-Carvajal AJ, Sola I, Lathyris D, Cardona AF: Human recombinant activated protein C for severe sepsis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011, 3: CD004388-Google Scholar
  17. Ranieri VM, Thompson BT, Barie PS, Dhainaut JF, Douglas IS, Finfer S, Gårdlund B, Marshall JC, Rhodes A, Artigas A, Payen D, Tenhunen J, Al-Khalidi HR, Thompson V, Janes J, Macias WL, Vangerow B, Williams MD: Drotrecogin alfa (activated) in adults with septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2012, 366: 2055-2064. 10.1056/NEJMoa1202290.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mitka M: Drug for severe sepsis is withdrawn from market, fails to reduce mortality. JAMA. 2011, 306: 2439-2440.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Schouten M, van 't Veer C, Van Den Boogaard FE, Gerlitz B, Grinnell BW, Roelofs JJ, Roelofs JJ, Levi M, van der Poll T: Therapeutic recombinant murine activated protein C attenuates pulmonary coagulopathy and improves survival in murine pneumococcal pneumonia. J Infect Dis. 2010, 202: 1600-1607. 10.1086/656787.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Schouten M, van 't Veer C, Roelofs JJ, Gerlitz B, Grinnell BW, Levi M, van der Poll T: Recombinant activated protein C attenuates coagulopathy and inflammation when administered early in murine pneumococcal pneumonia. Thromb Haemost. 2011, 106: 1189-1196. 10.1160/TH11-06-0438.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Isermann B, Vinnikov IA, Madhusudhan T, Herzog S, Kashif M, Blautzik J, Corat MA, Zeier M, Blessing E, Oh J, Gerlitz B, Berg DT, Grinnell BW, Chavakis T, Esmon CT, Weiler H, Bierhaus A, Nawroth PP: Activated protein C protects against diabetic nephropathy by inhibiting endothelial and podocyte apoptosis. Nat Med. 2007, 13: 1349-1358. 10.1038/nm1667.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kager LM, Wiersinga WJ, Roelofs JJ, de Boer OJ, Meijers JC, Isermann B, van't Veer C, Van der Poll T: Overexpression of Activated Protein C is Detrimental During Severe Experimental Gram-Negative Sepsis (Melioidosis)*. Crit Care Med. 2013, 41: e266-e274. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828a4316.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kager LM, Wiersinga WJ, Roelofs JJ, Meijers JC, Zeerleder SS, Esmon CT, van der Poll T: Endogenous protein C has a protective role during Gram-negative pneumosepsis (melioidosis). J Thromb Haemost. 2013, 11: 282-292. 10.1111/jth.12094.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Schouten M, van't Veer C, Roelofs JJ, Levi M, van der Poll T: Protease-activated receptor-1 impairs host defense in murine pneumococcal pneumonia: a controlled laboratory study. Crit Care. 2012, 16: R238-10.1186/cc11910.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Kalil AC, Florescu DF: Severe sepsis: are PROWESS and PROWESS-SHOCK trials comparable? A clinical and statistical heterogeneity analysis. Crit Care. 2013, 17: 167-10.1186/cc12752.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Opal SM, LaRosa SP: Recombinant human activated protein C as a therapy for severe sepsis: lessons learned?. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013, 187: 1041-1043. 10.1164/rccm.201303-0505ED.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Holder AL, Huang DT: A dream deferred: the rise and fall of recombinant activated protein C. Crit Care. 2013, 17: 309-10.1186/cc12533.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. van der Poll T, de Boer JD, Levi M: The effect of inflammation on coagulation and vice versa. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2011, 24: 273-278. 10.1097/QCO.0b013e328344c078.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Macias WL, Dhainaut JF, Yan SC, Helterbrand JD, Seger M, Johnson G, Small DS: Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in patients with severe sepsis. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2002, 72: 391-402. 10.1067/mcp.2002.128148.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Elphick GF, Sarangi PP, Hyun YM, Hollenbaugh JA, Ayala A, Biffl WL, Chung HL, Rezaie AR, McGrath JL, Topham DJ, Reichner JS, Kim M: Recombinant human activated protein C inhibits integrin-mediated neutrophil migration. Blood. 2009, 113: 4078-4085. 10.1182/blood-2008-09-180968.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Slofstra SH, Groot AP, Maris NA, Reitsma PH, Cate HT, Spek CA: Inhalation of activated protein C inhibits endotoxin-induced pulmonary inflammation in mice independent of neutrophil recruitment. Br J Pharmacol. 2006, 149: 740-746. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706915.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Abraham E: Effects of recombinant human activated protein C in human models of endotoxin administration. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2005, 2: 243-247. 10.1513/pats.200501-004AC.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Galley HF, El Sakka NE, Webster NR, Lowes DA, Cuthbertson BH: Activated protein C inhibits chemotaxis and interleukin-6 release by human neutrophils without affecting other neutrophil functions. Br J Anaesth. 2008, 100: 815-819. 10.1093/bja/aen079.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kirschenbaum LA, Lopez WC, Ohrum P, Tsen A, Khazin J, Astiz ME: Effect of recombinant activated protein C and low-dose heparin on neutrophil-endothelial cell interactions in septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2006, 34: 2207-2212. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000229880.41513.86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Nick JA, Coldren CD, Geraci MW, Poch KR, Fouty BW, O'Brien J, Gruber M, Zarini S, Murphy RC, Kuhn K, Richter D, Kast KR, Abraham E: Recombinant human activated protein C reduces human endotoxin-induced pulmonary inflammation via inhibition of neutrophil chemotaxis. Blood. 2004, 104: 3878-3885. 10.1182/blood-2004-06-2140.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Braach N, Frommhold D, Buschmann K, Pflaum J, Koch L, Hudalla H, Staudacher K, Wang H, Isermann B, Nawroth P, Poeschl J: RAGE controls activation and anti-inflammatory signalling of protein C. PLoS One. 2014, 9: e89422-10.1371/journal.pone.0089422.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Curry FR, Adamson RH: Tonic regulation of vascular permeability. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2013, 207: 628-649. 10.1111/apha.12076.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Feistritzer C, Riewald M: Endothelial barrier protection by activated protein C through PAR1-dependent sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor-1 crossactivation. Blood. 2005, 105: 3178-3184. 10.1182/blood-2004-10-3985.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© de Boer et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement