Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Can a routine follow-up blood culture be justified in Klebsiella pneumoniaebacteremia? a retrospective case–control study

  • Chang Kyung Kang1,
  • Eu Suk Kim1, 2Email author,
  • Kyoung-Ho Song1, 2,
  • Hong Bin Kim1, 2,
  • Taek Soo Kim2,
  • Nak-Hyun Kim1,
  • Chung-Jong Kim1, 2,
  • Pyoeng Gyun Choe1,
  • Ji-Hwan Bang1,
  • Wan Beom Park1,
  • Kyoung Un Park2,
  • Sang Won Park1,
  • Nam-Joong Kim1,
  • Eui-Chong Kim1 and
  • Myoung-don Oh1
BMC Infectious Diseases201313:365

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-365

Received: 23 March 2013

Accepted: 25 July 2013

Published: 2 August 2013

Abstract

Background

The need for mandatory confirmation of negative conversion in Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia (KpB) has not been adequately addressed. We conducted a retrospective case–control study of adult patients with KpB over a 5-year period in two tertiary-care hospitals to determine the risk factors for persistent bacteremia and to reevaluate the necessity of follow-up blood culture in KpB.

Methods

Persistent KpB is defined as the finding of K. pneumoniae in more than two separate blood-culture samples for longer than a two-day period in a single episode. The case- and control-groups were patients with persistent and non-persistent KpB, respectively, and they were matched 1-to-3 according to age and gender.

Results

Among 1068 KpB episodes analyzed after excluding polymicrobial infection and repeated KpB, follow-up blood cultures were performed in 862 cases (80.7%), 62 of which (7.2%) were persistent. Independent risk factors for persistence were intra-abdominal infection, higher Charlson’s comorbidity weighted index score, prior solid organ transplantation, and unfavorable treatment response, which was defined as positivity for at least two parameters among fever, leukocytosis, and no decrease of C-reactive protein on the second day after initial culture. A proposed scoring system using four variables, namely, intra-abdominal infection, nosocomial KpB, fever and lack of C-reactive protein decrease, the last two being assessed on the second day after the initial blood culture, showed that only 4.9% of the patients with no risk factors or with only intra-abdominal infection had persistent KpB.

Conclusions

Though persistent KpB is uncommon, follow-up blood culture was performed in as many as 80% of the cases in this study. A more careful clinical assessment is warranted to reduce the cost and patient inconvenience involved in follow-up blood culture.

Keywords

Klebsiella pneumoniae Bacteremia Risk factor Follow-up Blood culture

Background

Klebsiella pneumoniae is one of the most important pathogens causing urinary tract infection, pneumonia, intra-abdominal infection, and primary bacteremia. It is also the second most common cause of community- and hospital-acquired gram-negative bacteremia [13]. Mortality from Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia (KpB) is about 20 to 40% [35], and its population-based incidence ranges from 7.1 to 9.7 per 100,000 person-years [5, 6].

There is evidence that the usefulness of routine blood cultures should be reconsidered in acute pyelonephritis [7, 8], cellulitis [9], community-acquired pneumonia [10, 11], and in isolated fever or leukocytosis [12]. Although attempts have been made to reduce unnecessary blood cultures by introducing clinical rules [1214], clear guidelines have yet to emerge as to when blood cultures should be drawn. And blood cultures are liberally prescribed because of the high mortality due to bacteremia, anxiety about undertreatment, and fear of using inappropriate antimicrobial agents causing limited positivity of 4 to 7% [12, 15, 16].

Although it is widely appreciated that the requirement for follow-up blood cultures in bacteremic patients is questionable, they may still be prescribed too liberally, resulting in low rates of positive outcomes. Although routine follow-up blood culture is recommended in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and in infective endocarditis [17], the need for mandatory confirmation of negative conversion in KpB has not been adequately addressed. The objective of the present study was to determine the risk factors for persistent bacteremia and to reevaluate the need for routine follow-up blood cultures in KpB.

Methods

Study setting and patients

Data on all episodes of KpB were collected from the electronic medical record systems between January 2007 and December 2011 at Seoul National University Hospital (a 1600-bed tertiary-care hospital, Seoul, Korea) and Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (a 900-bed tertiary-care hospital, Seongnam, Korea). All adult patients (≥ 18 years) who suffered their first KpB episodes were enrolled. Cases of polymicrobial infection, and repeated episodes of KpB in the same patient, were excluded.

Case- and control-patients were those with persistent KpB and non-persistent KpB, respectively. They were matched 1-to-3 according to age and gender using a greedy algorithm. The data reviewed included primary site of infection, Charlson’s co-morbidity weighted index [18], intensive care unit (ICU) admission during the episode of KpB, severity of illness as measured by the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score [19] and Pitt bacteremia score [20]; also microbiologic characteristics, both appropriateness of empirical antibiotic regimen and length of time from initial blood culture to antibiotic administration, as well as presence of fever, leukocytosis, and the trend of C-reactive protein (CRP) on the second day after initial blood culture. We also assessed the nosocomial or community onset of KpB, presentation with septic shock, presence of metastatic infection, antibiotic or immunosuppressive therapy within the previous year, history of solid organ transplantation, any invasive procedure undertaken and neutropenia within 72 hours before the onset of KpB, together with in-hospital mortality, and length of hospital stay.

The study was approved by the institutional review board of Seoul National University Hospital and Seoul National University Bundang Hospital.

Definitions

The initial blood culture was defined as the first positive blood culture for K. pneumoniae. Persistent KpB was defined as finding of K. pneumoniae in more than one separate blood cultures for longer than a 2-day period in a single infection episode. When an isolate was resistant to both cefotaxime and ceftazidime, it was suspected of being extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing K. pneumoniae. A nosocomial infection was defined as an infection that occurred more than 48 hours after admission to hospital [21]. Fever and leukocytosis were defined as body temperature of ≥38°C and white blood cell count of >10,000 /μL. Neutropenia was defined as an absolute neutrophil count below 500/mL. Invasive procedures included insertion of a central venous catheter, endoscopy, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, insertion of a nasogastric tube, bronchoscopy, parenteral nutrition, and insertion or manipulation of a percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage [22].

Antimicrobial therapy was considered inappropriate if the isolate was not susceptible to the chosen antibiotic in vitro. The presence of at least two of the following: fever, leukocytosis, and lack of CRP decrease on the second day after initial blood culture, was pre-defined as an unfavorable treatment response before data collection.

Microbiologic analyses

BacT/ALERT FA and FN (bioMe´rieux, Durham, North Carolina) was used for all blood cultures. Antimicrobial susceptibility was identified with a Microscan WalkAway-96 (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Deerfield, Illinois) and VITEK 2 (bioMe´rieux, Marcy L’etoil, France), using the criteria of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. For suspected ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae isolates, ESBL production was confirmed by the double disk synergy test according to the CLSI performance standards [17].

Statistical analyses

Conditional logistic regression was used in univariable and multivariable analyses to manage matched data. Variables with P values of < 0.10 in the univariable analysis or of clinical importance (i.e., intra-abdominal infection) were subjected to multivariable analysis. To evaluate the proposed scoring system, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was carried out. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant. PASW for Windows (version 18 software package; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used in the analyses.

Results

Rate of follow-up blood culture and incidence of persistent KpB

Of a total of 1372 KpB episodes during the study period, 1068 were included in this study, after excluding 173 cases of polymicrobial infection and 131 cases of repeated KpB. Among the 1068 enrolled cases of KpB, follow-up blood cultures were performed in 862 cases (80.7%), and their incidence was highest on the second day after the initial blood culture (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Sixty-two (7.2%) were found to be persistent KpB, and 186 non-persistent KpB cases were matched with the latter as described above.

Risk factors for persistent KpB

Univariable analysis of the data indicated that the factors significantly associated with persistent KpB as opposed to non-persistent KpB included higher Charlson’s comorbidity weighted index score, ICU admission, nosocomial infection, immunosuppressive therapy during the previous year, history of solid organ transplantation, invasive procedure during the previous 72 hours, fever and lack of CRP decrease on the second day after initial blood culture, ESBL-producing KpB, inappropriate empirical antibiotic use, and in-hospital mortality (Table 1).
Table 1

Univariable analysis for risk factors associated with persistent Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia (cases) vs. non-persistent Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia (controls)

Variables

Cases (n = 62)

Controls (n = 186)

OR (95% CI)

P

Age (± SD)

63.77 (± 14.58)

63.58 (± 14.34)

  

Male sex

45 (72.6)

135 (72.6)

  

Urinary tract infection

7 (11.3)

20 (10.8)

1.05 (0.43-2.58)

0.908

Intra-abdominal infection

12 (19.4)

22 (11.8)

1.82 (0.83-4.00)

0.136

Biliary tract infection

13 (21.0)

53 (28.5)

0.65 (.032-1.32)

0.236

Liver abscess

8 (12.9)

31 (16.7)

0.73 (0.31-1.72)

0.469

Pneumonia

8 (12.9)

18 (9.7)

1.36 (0.57-3.20)

0.487

Primary bacteremia

9 (14.5)

34 (18.3)

0.73 (0.31-1.72)

0.474

Central venous catheter related infection

2 (3.2)

4 (2.2)

1.50 (0.28-8.19)

0.640

Charlson’s CWI score (± SD)

6.29 (± 3.05)

5.52 (± 2.94)

1.14 (1.01-1.28)

0.037

ICU admission

18 (29.0)

30 (16.1)

2.12 (1.08-4.16)

0.029

Presentation with septic shock

22 (35.5)

53 (28.5)

1.35 (0.75-2.44)

0.316

APACHE-II score (± SD)

18.97 (± 9.28)

17.09 (± 8.16)

1.03 (0.99-1.06)

0.140

Pitt bacteremia score (± SD)

2.45 (± 2.67)

2.17 (± 2.45)

1.04 (0.94-1.16)

0.452

Nosocomial infection

34 (54.8)

55 (29.6)

2.96 (1.61-5.43)

<0.001

Previous antibiotic use ≤ 1 year

37 (59.7)

95 (51.1)

1.42 (0.79-2.54)

0.240

Immunosuppressive therapy ≤ 1 year

5 (8.1)

4 (2.2)

4.46 (1.05-18.95)

0.043

History of solid organ transplantation

4 (6.5)

2 (1.1)

10.18 (1.11-93.02)

0.040

Invasive procedure ≤ 72 hours before initial BC

20 (32.3)

30 (16.1)

2.56 (1.29-5.07)

0.007

Neutropenia ≤ 72 hours before initial BC

11 (17.7)

31 (16.7)

1.08 (0.50-2.33)

0.843

Presence of metastatic infection

5 (8.1)

9 (4.8)

1.67 (0.56-4.97)

0.360

Inappropriate drainage

11 (17.7)

20 (10.8)

1.81 (0.80-4.07)

0.154

Fever on the 2 nd day after initial BC

38 (61.3)

46 (24.7)

5.18 (2.64-10.16)

<0.001

Leukocytosis on the 2nd day after initial BC

23 (37.1)

60 (32.3)

1.22 (0.68-2.19)

0.499

Lack of CRP decrease on the 2 nd day after initial BC

26 (41.9)

43 (23.1)

2.38 (1.29-4.39)

0.010

Unfavorable treatment response on the 2 nd day after initial BC

27 (43.5)

30 (16.1)

4.69 (2.27-9.69)

<0.001

ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia

28 (45.2)

31 (16.7)

3.99 (2.09-7.63)

<0.001

Inappropriate empirical antibiotic use

22 (35.5)

24 (12.9)

4.02 (1.95-8.31)

<0.001

Length of time to empirical antibiotic administration from initial BC (minute, ± SD)

182.8 (± 221.3)

228.4 (± 434.8)

1.00 (0.99-1.00)

0.430

In-hospital mortality

19 (30.6)

34 (18.3)

1.96 (1.02-3.78)

0.044

Length of hospital stay (day, ± SD)

45.1 (± 43.0)

38.6 (± 74.9)

1.00 (0.99-1.01)

0.524

Data are no. (%) of patients, unless otherwise indicated.

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; SD, standard deviation; CWI, comorbidity weighted index; ICU, intensive care unit; APACHE, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation; BC, blood culture; CRP, C-reactive protein; ESBL, extended-spectrum β -lactamase.

Multivariable analysis revealed that the independent risk factors for persistent KpB were intra-abdominal infection (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-8.31; P = 0.036), higher Charlson’s comorbidity weighted index score (aOR, 1.18 per each point; 95% CI, 1.01-1.36; P = 0.032), history of solid organ transplantation (aOR, 92.23; 95% CI, 1.27-6689.96; P = 0.038), and unfavorable treatment response (aOR, 4.79; 95% CI, 1.89-12.14; P = 0.001). The concept of unfavorable treatment response was introduced and substituted for fever, leukocytosis, and lack of CRP decrease in the multivariable analysis, to avoid the multicolinearity among those three variables. Neither ESBL-producing KpB nor inappropriate empirical antibiotic use was found to be an independent risk factor (Table 2).
Table 2

Independent risk factors for persistent Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia

Variables

Adjusted OR (95% CI)

P

Intra-abdominal infection

2.99 (1.07-8.31)

0.036

Charlson’s CWI score (± SD)

1.18 (1.01-1.36)

0.032

ICU admission

1.98 (0.80-4.87)

0.139

Nosocomial infection

2.05 (0.81-5.21)

0.130

Immunosuppressive therapy ≤ 1 year

0.36 (0.02-8.90)

0.533

History of solid organ transplantation

92.23 (1.27-6689.96)

0.038

Invasive procedure ≤ 72 hours before initial BC

0.77 (0.27-2.19)

0.618

Unfavorable treatment response on the 2 nd day after initial BC

4.79 (1.89-12.14)

0.001

ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia

1.72 (0.63-4.69)

0.293

Inappropriate empirical antibiotic use

2.76 (0.93-8.23)

0.068

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; SD, standard deviation; CWI, comorbidity weighted index; ICU, intensive care unit; BC, blood culture; ESBL, extended-spectrum β -lactamase.

Percentage of persistent KpBaccording to clinical score

To estimate the likelihood of persistent KpB, a scoring system was introduced, based on the presence or absence of four risk factors viz. intra-abdominal infection, nosocomial KpB, fever and lack of CRP decrease, the last two being assessed on the second day after initial blood culture. According to their odds ratio in a conditional logistic regression with these four risk factors, the weighted scores given for the risk factors were 1, 2, 3, and 2, respectively (Table 3).
Table 3

Odds ratios and adjusted weighted scores for the four variables used in the scoring system

Variables

OR

Log (OR)

Adjusted weighted score

Intra-abdominal infection

1.87

0.63

1

Nosocomial infection

3.24

1.18

2

Fever on the 2nd day after initial blood culture

8.30

2.12

3

Lack of CRP decrease on the 2nd day after initial blood culture

3.10

1.13

2

OR, odds ratio; CRP, C-reactive protein.

The frequency of persistent KpB exceeded 50% when the score was greater than five; conversely, it was only 4.9% when the score was zero to one with no risk factors, or with intra-abdominal infection as the only risk factor (Figure 1). This indicates that persistent KpB is likely to be rarer among patients with fewer risk factors. A ROC analysis showed that the area under the curve was 0.78 (P <0.0001) and the best cut-off was 2 (sensitivity, 0.81; specificity, 0.64, Additional file 2: Figure S2).
Figure 1

Percentage of persistent Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia and number of cases according to clinical score. There was a positive relationship between clinical score and percent persistent KpB.

Discussion

K. pneumoniae is one of the most important pathogens causing nosocomial and community-acquired infections, and clinicians sometimes encounter persistent KpB in clinical practice. Despite the fact that the CLSI guidelines do not recommend routine follow-up blood cultures except in cases of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and infective endocarditis [17], our understanding of the occurrence of persistent KpB and the frequency of follow-up blood cultures is far from complete. The present study showed that, although follow-up blood cultures were performed in 80.7% of the cases, only 7.2% were found to be persistent KpB. Furthermore, more than two consecutive blood cultures were performed in 53.2% of the patients with non-persistent KpB in the present study (Data not shown). These results imply that most of these follow-up blood cultures would have been unwarranted. Studies have shown that only 4 to 7% of blood cultures are positive owing to its liberal prescription [12, 15, 16], and our data with follow-up blood cultures also point to a similar situation. Our multivariable analysis revealed that unfavorable treatment response was an independent risk factor for persistent KpB, along with intra-abdominal infection, high Charlson’s comorbidity weighted index score, and prior solid organ transplantation. All this suggests that, when treating suspected KpB patients, the clinical findings should be considered carefully before opting for follow-up blood culture, to reduce indiscriminate prescription and the ensuing cost and patient inconvenience.

Severe underlying disease and prior organ transplantation are established risk factors for KpB [4, 5, 23, 24], as they were for persistent KpB in this study. An intra-abdominal origin of KpB is a known risk factor for mortality [4, 5], and it was also significantly associated with persistent KpB in our analysis. Although the KpB of respiratory tract origin has been documented to be a risk factor for mortality [4, 5, 23], it was not significantly associated with persistent KpB in this study. It would be interesting to find their association further by taking many factors into account, including the limitations of this study as explained below.

According to Kang et al.[25, 26], ESBL-producing organism and inappropriate empirical antibiotic are not risk factors for increased mortality in bloodstream infections due to K. pneumoniae. We also found that production of ESBL was not an independent risk factor for persistent KpB, which indicates that follow-up blood cultures are not routinely needed in cases of ESBL-producing KpB. However, inappropriate empirical antibiotic regimen may call for further evaluation because of its borderline P value.

Various definitions of persistent bacteremia have been used in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia [2729]. Our definition of persistent bacteremia was not as strict as others because both the failure of appropriate antimicrobial therapy and prolonged periods of bacteremia were not essential elements of our consideration. If a stricter definition had been used, the incidence of persistent KpB would have been further reduced, which supports our suggestion that more care should be taken before opting for follow-up blood culture.

Our scoring system, which has fair discriminative ability, could be used as a guide for whether a follow-up blood culture is needed, since there was a positive relationship between clinical score and percent persistent KpB (Figure 1): the percentage of persistent KpB declined sharply as the score decreased, and less than 5% of the patients with zero or one point had persistent bacteremia. On the other hand, follow-up blood culture could be justified in patients with more than five points because more than a half of those would be expected to suffer from persistent bacteremia. According to our data, if follow-up blood cultures were only carried out in patients with scores exceeding 2 points, more than 50% of follow-up blood cultures could be avoided (Figure 1).

There are some limitations to this study. There is a possibility of bias because it was a retrospective study with a limited sample size. Although our scoring system appeared to be useful, as discussed above, it should be further assessed on a larger sample. We were not able to evaluate the possible impact of age and gender on persistent KpB by matching for these factors because of the design of this study. Also, there may have been selection bias in the 19.3% of patients without follow-up blood culture, one third of whom died by the 2nd day after blood culture (data not shown).

Persistent KpB showed significantly worse outcomes, such as in-hospital mortality (P = 0.044) and ICU admission during the KpB episode (P = 0.029) in univariable analyses (Table 1). However, we did not perform multivariable analysis for mortality-related factors, mainly because the study design was focused on persistence of bacteremia, and also the matching was carried out in that context.

Finally, this study was undertaken in university-affiliated tertiary-care hospitals where a large proportion of the patients might have severe underlying diseases including malignancy. However, 64.1% and 25.0% of our cases involved community-onset and community-acquired KpB, respectively (data not shown). The rate of persistent KpB would be expected to be much lower in a community-based hospital since a high Charlson’s comorbidity weighed index score is an independent risk factor for persistent KpB and the comorbidities in patients in community-based hospitals are likely to be less severe.

Conclusions

In conclusion, unfavorable treatment response on the second day after initial blood culture, intra-abdominal infection, high Charlson’s comorbidity weighted index score, and prior solid organ transplantation are independent risk factors for persistent KpB. Since patients with persistent KpB were rare, especially among individuals with few risk factors, routine follow-up blood culture may not be justified. More careful clinical assessment before deciding on follow-up blood culture would reduce costs and inconvenience to patients.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Seoul National University College of Medicine
(2)
Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

References

  1. Skogberg K, Lyytikainen O, Ruutu P, Ollgren J, Nuorti JP: Increase in bloodstream infections in Finland, 1995–2002. Epidemiol Infect. 2008, 136 (1): 108-114.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Uslan DZ, Crane SJ, Steckelberg JM, Cockerill FR, St Sauver JL, Wilson WR, Baddour LM: Age- and sex-associated trends in bloodstream infection: a population-based study in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Arch Intern Med. 2007, 167 (8): 834-839. 10.1001/archinte.167.8.834.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Yinnon AM, Butnaru A, Raveh D, Jerassy Z, Rudensky B: Klebsiella bacteraemia: community versus nosocomial infection. QJM. 1996, 89 (12): 933-941. 10.1093/qjmed/89.12.933.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Kang CI, Kim SH, Bang JW, Kim HB, Kim NJ, Kim EC, Oh MD, Choe KW: Community-acquired versus nosocomial Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia: clinical features, treatment outcomes, and clinical implication of antimicrobial resistance. J Korean Med Sci. 2006, 21 (5): 816-822. 10.3346/jkms.2006.21.5.816.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Meatherall BL, Gregson D, Ross T, Pitout JD, Laupland KB: Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia. Am J Med. 2009, 122 (9): 866-873. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.03.034.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Al-Hasan MN, Lahr BD, Eckel-Passow JE, Baddour LM: Epidemiology and outcome of Klebsiella species bloodstream infection: a population-based study. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010, 85 (2): 139-144. 10.4065/mcp.2009.0410.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Velasco M, Martinez JA, Moreno-Martinez A, Horcajada JP, Ruiz J, Barranco M, Almela M, Vila J, Mensa J: Blood cultures for women with uncomplicated acute pyelonephritis: are they necessary?. Clin Infect Dis. 2003, 37 (8): 1127-1130. 10.1086/378291.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen Y, Nitzan O, Saliba W, Chazan B, Colodner R, Raz R: Are blood cultures necessary in the management of women with complicated pyelonephritis?. J Infect. 2006, 53 (4): 235-240. 10.1016/j.jinf.2005.12.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Paolo WF, Poreda AR, Grant W, Scordino D, Wojcik S: Blood culture results do not affect treatment in complicated cellulitis. J Emerg Med. 2013, Apr 12. [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  10. Campbell SG, Marrie TJ, Anstey R, Dickinson G, Ackroyd-Stolarz S: The contribution of blood cultures to the clinical management of adult patients admitted to the hospital with community-acquired pneumonia: a prospective observational study. Chest. 2003, 123 (4): 1142-1150. 10.1378/chest.123.4.1142.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Afshar N, Tabas J, Afshar K, Silbergleit R: Blood cultures for community-acquired pneumonia: are they worthy of two quality measures? A systematic review. J Hosp Med. 2009, 4 (2): 112-123. 10.1002/jhm.382.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Coburn B, Morris AM, Tomlinson G, Detsky AS: Does this adult patient with suspected bacteremia require blood cultures?. JAMA. 2012, 308 (5): 502-511. 10.1001/jama.2012.8262.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Shapiro NI, Wolfe RE, Wright SB, Moore R, Bates DW: Who needs a blood culture? A prospectively derived and validated prediction rule. J Emerg Med. 2008, 35 (3): 255-264. 10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.04.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Jones GR, Lowes JA: The systemic inflammatory response syndrome as a predictor of bacteraemia and outcome from sepsis. QJM. 1996, 89 (7): 515-522. 10.1093/qjmed/89.7.515.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Bates DW, Cook EF, Goldman L, Lee TH: Predicting bacteremia in hospitalized patients. A prospectively validated model. Ann Intern Med. 1990, 113 (7): 495-500. 10.7326/0003-4819-113-7-495.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Roth A, Wiklund AE, Palsson AS, Melander EZ, Wullt M, Cronqvist J, Walder M, Sturegard E: Reducing blood culture contamination by a simple informational intervention. J Clin Microbiol. 2010, 48 (12): 4552-4558. 10.1128/JCM.00877-10.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Principles and procedures for blood cultures; approved guideline. CLSI document M47-A. 2007, Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards InstituteGoogle Scholar
  18. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR: A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987, 40 (5): 373-383. 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE: APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985, 13 (10): 818-829. 10.1097/00003246-198510000-00009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Chow JW, Fine MJ, Shlaes DM, Quinn JP, Hooper DC, Johnson MP, Ramphal R, Wagener MM, Miyashiro DK, Yu VL: Enterobacter bacteremia: clinical features and emergence of antibiotic resistance during therapy. Ann Intern Med. 1991, 115 (8): 585-590. 10.7326/0003-4819-115-8-585.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Garner JS, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, Horan TC, Hughes JM: CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. Am J Infect Control. 1988, 16 (3): 128-140. 10.1016/0196-6553(88)90053-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Tumbarello M, Spanu T, Sanguinetti M, Citton R, Montuori E, Leone F, Fadda G, Cauda R: Bloodstream infections caused by extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: risk factors, molecular epidemiology, and clinical outcome. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006, 50 (2): 498-504. 10.1128/AAC.50.2.498-504.2006.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Tsay RW, Siu LK, Fung CP, Chang FY: Characteristics of bacteremia between community-acquired and nosocomial Klebsiella pneumoniae infection: risk factor for mortality and the impact of capsular serotypes as a herald for community-acquired infection. Arch Intern Med. 2002, 162 (9): 1021-1027. 10.1001/archinte.162.9.1021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Wang LS, Lee FY, Cheng DL, Liu CY, Hinthorn DR, Jost PM: Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia: analysis of 100 episodes. J Formos Med Assoc. 1990, 89 (9): 756-763.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kang CI, Kim SH, Kim DM, Park WB, Lee KD, Kim HB, Oh MD, Kim EC, Choe KW: Risk factors for and clinical outcomes of bloodstream infections caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004, 25 (10): 860-867. 10.1086/502310.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kang CI, Kim SH, Park WB, Lee KD, Kim HB, Kim EC, Oh MD, Choe KW: Bloodstream infections due to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae: risk factors for mortality and treatment outcome, with special emphasis on antimicrobial therapy. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004, 48 (12): 4574-4581. 10.1128/AAC.48.12.4574-4581.2004.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Hawkins C, Huang J, Jin N, Noskin GA, Zembower TR, Bolon M: Persistent Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: an analysis of risk factors and outcomes. Arch Intern Med. 2007, 167 (17): 1861-1867. 10.1001/archinte.167.17.1861.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Fowler VG, Sakoulas G, McIntyre LM, Meka VG, Arbeit RD, Cabell CH, Stryjewski ME, Eliopoulos GM, Reller LB, Corey GR, et al: Persistent bacteremia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection is associated with agr dysfunction and low-level in vitro resistance to thrombin-induced platelet microbicidal protein. J Infect Dis. 2004, 190 (6): 1140-1149. 10.1086/423145.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Jang HC, Kim SH, Kim KH, Kim CJ, Lee S, Song KH, Jeon JH, Park WB, Kim HB, Park SW, et al: Salvage treatment for persistent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: efficacy of linezolid with or without carbapenem. Clin Infect Dis. 2009, 49 (3): 395-401. 10.1086/600295.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/13/365/prepub

Copyright

© Kang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.