Research article
Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Association of mutation patterns in gyrA/B genes and ofloxacin resistance levels in Mycobacterium tuberculosisisolates from East China in 2009

  • Zhenling Cui1Email author,
  • Jie Wang1,
  • Junmei Lu1,
  • Xiaochen Huang1 and
  • Zhongyi Hu1
BMC Infectious Diseases201111:78

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-11-78

©  Cui et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

Received: 3 December 2010

Accepted: 29 March 2011

Published: 29 March 2011

Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to analyze the association of mutation patterns in gyrA and gyrB genes and the ofloxacin resistance levels in clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates sampled in 2009 from East China.

Methods

The quinolone resistance-determining region of gyrA/B were sequenced in 192 M. tuberculosis clinical isolates and the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 95 ofloxacin-resistant M. tuberculosis isolates were determined by using microplate nitrate reductase assays.

Results

Mutations in gyrA (codons 90, 91 and 94) and in gyrB (G551R, D500N, T539N, R485C/L) were observed in 89.5% (85/95) and 11.6% (11/95) of ofloxacin-resistant strains, respectively. The gyrB mutations G551R and G549D were observed in 4.1% (4/97) of ofloxacin-susceptible strains and no mutation was found in gyrA in ofloxacin-susceptible strains. The MICs of all ofloxacin-resistant strains showed no significant difference among strains with mutations at codons 90, 91 or 94 in gyrA (F = 1.268, p = 0.287). No differences were detected among strains with different amino acid mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining region of gyrA (F = 1.877, p = 0.123). The difference in MICs between ofloxacin-resistant strains with mutations in gyrA only and ofloxacin-resistant strains with mutations in both gyrA and gyrB genes was not statistically significant (F = 0.549, p = 0.461).

Conclusions

Although gyrA/B mutations can lead to ofloxacin resistance in M. tuberculosis, there were no associations of different mutation patterns in gyrA/B and the level of ofloxacin resistance in M. tuberculosis isolates from East China in 2009.

Background

Fluoroquinolones (FQs), such as ofloxacin (OFX), levofloxacin and moxifloxacin, are widely used anti-tubercular therapeutic agents for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MTB) [1]. In mycobacteria, FQs bind to DNA gyrase and inhibit DNA replication [2]. This mechanism has been verified by the structural analysis and functional analysis of enzymes of M. tuberculosis (MTB), including DNA gyrase [3, 4]. These studies showed that the MTB strains with wild-type gyrA/B genes were highly susceptible to FQs. Moreover, a murine model study showed that low-level FQ resistance could be overcome with the use of high dose moxifloxacin [5].

Since FQs are often prescribed as broad-spectrum antibiotics for the treatment of undiagnosed respiratory infections, and because TB patients are not treated normatively, FQ-resistant TB has become more prevalent [6]. With the occurrence of extensively drug-resistant TB in recent years, concerns about FQ-resistant TB have been raised [7–9]. Reports show that the majority (approximately 50%~90%) of FQ-resistant MTB isolates carry mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining region (QRDR) of the gyrA gene [2, 10–15], and that a small number have mutations in the gyrB gene [16, 17]. Much research has focused on the mutations in gyrA/gyrB of MTB to determine the drug susceptibility to FQs [15, 18]. A correlation between quinolone susceptibility patterns and nucleotide sequences in the A and B subunits of DNA gyrase in 14 mycobacterial species has been described [19]. There are, however, no data on the correlation between quinolone susceptibility patterns and gyrA/gyrB mutations in MTB clinical isolates. This study aimed to investigate whether different mutations in gyrA/gyrB could lead to different levels of FQ-resistance in MTB strains. We analyzed the association of OFX resistance levels and the characterization of different mutations in gyrA/gyrB related to this resistance in clinical MTB isolates from East China.

Methods

Strain selection

A total of 192 MTB clinical isolates were collected from epidemiologically unlinked pulmonary TB patients in East China in 2009. The epidemiological selection was analyzed by IS6110 restriction fragment length polymorphisms [20]. All MTB strains were identified by biochemical methods and by PCR detection based on primers derived from IS6110 [21]. All samples were tested for OFX-resistance by the MGIT 960 method (Becton & Dickinson) and a total of 95 OFX-resistant MTB strains were selected at random. Ninety-seven OFX-susceptible MTB strains were also selected at random from all of the OFX-susceptible strains. The MTB H37Rv strain (ATCC 27294) was used as the reference control. The study was approved by the ethics committee of Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from all the participants.

Drug susceptibility analysis

The drug susceptibility test (DST) of selected strains was carried out by the MGIT 960 method [22, 23]. OFX (Sigma Aldrich Co., St Louis, USA) was dissolved in 0.1 M NaOH and diluted in purified water. The stock solutions were made at a concentration of 10 g/L and sterilized using a 0.22 μm polycarbonate membrane filter (Camghwohill, Co. Cork, Ireland). The stock solutions were stored at -70°C in small aliquots for up to 6 months. Frozen drug solutions were thawed once and then discarded. The OFX test concentration was 2 mg/L.

MIC determination

The MIC determination of selected strains was carried out by using a microplate nitrate reductase assay (NRA), as described by Kumar et al [24]. The final concentrations of OFX ranged from 0.125 mg/L to 64 mg/L.

DNA extraction

One ml of MTB suspension collected from a MGIT 960 control tube was transferred to a 1.5 ml tube and centrifuged at 10,000 g for 5 min. The supernatant was discarded and the sediment was re-suspended in 50 μl DNA extraction solution (0.04% NaOH, 0.1% SDS and 15% Chelex-100 chelating resin) and mixed by vortexing. Subsequently, the tube was incubated at 100°C for 15 min and centrifuged at 13,000 g for 10 min after it had cooled. Finally, the supernatant was transferred to another 1.5 ml tube and preserved at -20°C until further use.

PCR

GyrA was amplified with the use of the gyrAF (5'- AGACACGACGTTGCCGC- CTG-3') and gyrAR (5'- CTGACCCGTTGGCCAGCAGG-3') primers. GyrB was amplified with the use of the gyrBF (5'- GCGCTGACGTCGGTGGTGAA-3') and gyrBR (5'- ATTCCGGGTCACTGCGCTGC-3') primers. These primers were designed by Primer-BLAST software with reference to the gyrA (GenBank accession no.: NC_000962.2) and gyrB (GenBank accession no.: NC_000962.2) gene sequences of MTB. The sizes of the amplified fragments were 530 bp for gyrA and 772 bp for gyrB.

Sequencing

PCR products were purified and sequenced by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China). DNA sequences were analyzed with MegAlign 5.01 software (Demonstration System DNASTAR, Inc., Madison, USA).

Statistical analysis

SPSS software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for the statistical analysis. The MICs of OFX-resistant MTB strains with different mutations in gyrA or gyrB were compared by the analysis of variance (ANOVA) test.

Results

Mutations were observed in the QRDRs of gyrA/gyrB in 87 out of 95 (91.6%) OFX-resistant MTB strains, apart from a S95T mutation in gyrA, which was a natural polymorphism [25] that occurred in both OFX-resistant and OFX susceptible strains in this study. No mutations were observed in the QRDRs of gyrA/gyrB in 8 out of 95 OFX-resistant MTB strains (8.4%) except for the S95T mutation in gyrA. The MICs of 97 OFX-susceptible strains were less than 2 mg/L while the MICs of 95 OFX-resistant strains were ≥2 mg/L.

Mutations were observed in the QRDR of gyrA in 85 of the 95 (89.5%) OFX-resistant strains, while none of the OFX-susceptible strains displayed any mutations. The most common single nucleotide mutation sites were codons 94, 91, and 90 and, in total, the relative frequencies of these codons were 56.8% (54/95), 6.3% (6/95) and 25.3% (24/95), respectively. There was one OFX-resistant strain with two mutations (codons 90 and 94) in gyrA.

GyrA mutations and MICs of the 85 OFX-resistant MTB mutants are shown in Table 1. The OFX MICs of strains with mutations at codon 94 ranged from 2 mg/L to 32 mg/L, with a median of 4 mg/L. The OFX MICs of resistant strains with mutations at either codon 90 or 91 ranged from 2 mg/L to 16 mg/L (median, 4 mg/L). The OFX MICs of three OFX-resistant groups with different single codon mutations in gyrA were analyzed by ANOVA, which showed no statistically significant difference among the three groups (F = 1.268, p = 0.287). The difference of OFX MICs of seven OFX-resistant groups with different amino acid mutations (A90V, S91P, D94A, D94G, D94N, D94Y, D94F) in gyrA were also analyzed by ANOVA, which also showed no significant differences (F = 0.829, p = 0.551). The difference of OFX MICs of five OFX-resistant groups with different amino acid mutations at codon 94 (D94A, D94G, D94N, D94Y, D94F) in gyrA showed no statistical significance (F = 0.455, p = 0.768).
Table 1

The patterns of gyrA mutations and OFX MICs profile of OFX-resistant MTB strains

Codon mutation

Nucleotide change

No. of strains

  

MIC (mg/L)

  

2

4

8

16

32

D94A

GAC-GCC

4

 

2

 

1

D94G

GAC-GGC

5

10

10

3

3

D94N

GAC-AAC

2

2

2

1

 

D94Y

GAC-TAC

1

3

4

  

D94F

GAC-TTC

1

    

A90V

GCG-GTC/GTG

6

10

7

1

 

S91P

TCG-CCG

2

2

 

2

 

A90V&D94Y

GCG-GTC & GAC-TAC

   

1

 
Mutations were observed in the QRDRs of gyrB in 11 of the 95 (11.6%) OFX-resistant strains. The single nucleotide mutation sites were in codons 551, 500, 539 and 485, according to the GenBank CAB02426.1 numbering system. In total, the relative frequencies of these codons were 3.2% (3/95), 4.2% (4/95), 2.1% (2/95) and 2.1% (2/95), respectively. The MICs and the mutations of gyrA of OFX-resistant strains with mutations in gyrB are shown in Table 2. There were two OFX-resistant strains with only mutations in gyrB, one at codon 485 and one at codon 500. Amino acid mutations were observed in QRDRs of gyrB in 4 of the 97 (4.1%) OFX-susceptible strains. These mutations were from Gly (GGG) to Arg (AGG) at codon 551 in three samples and from Gly (GGC) to Asp (GAC) at codon 549 in one strain. There was also a single silent mutation from Ile (ATC) to Ile (ATT) at codon 457 in one OFX-susceptible strain.
Table 2

The patterns of gyrA/B mutation and OFX MICs profile of 11 OFX-resistant MTB strains

gyrB

gyrA

No. of strains

Codon mutation

Nucleotide change

Codon mutation

MICs (mg/L)

   

2

4

8

16

G551R

GGG-AGG

A90 V

 

1

1

 

G551R

GGG-AGG

D94G

 

1

  

D500N

GAC-AAC

A90V

   

1

D500N

GAC-AAC

S91P

   

1

D500N

GAC-AAC

D94N

  

1

 

D500N

GAC-AAC

No mutation

  

1

 

T539N

ACC-AAC

A90V

  

2

 

R485L

CGT-CTT

No mutation

1

   

R485C

CGT-TGT

A90V

  

1

 

The MICs of OFX-resistant strains with mutations in gyrA only and without mutations in gyrB were compared with the MICs of OFX-resistant strains that had mutations in both gyrA and gyrB. The difference in MICs of the two groups were analyzed by ANOVA, which showed no statistical significance between the two groups (F = 0.549, p = 0.461).

Discussion

Previous studies have shown that the level of drug resistance of MTB is linked to gene mutations. Huitric et al. described that most rpoB mutations are correlated with high-level resistance against rifampicin and that a lower level of resistance was associated with mutations in codon 522 of rpoB [26]. Kim et al. showed that mutations in codon 315 of katG were associated with high levels of isoniazid resistance, whereas a mutation in the inhA promoter region was associated with low-level resistance to isoniazid [27].

Mutations in short regions of gyrA, known as QRDR, have been associated with FQ resistance in MTB [28]. Several studies [10, 11, 13] have analyzed the mutations in the gyrA gene in clinical isolates of MTB. Most of these studies focused on the frequency of the mutations in gyrA/gyrB genes in FQ-resistant MTB strains. There are, however, no data on the association of mutations in gyrA/gyrB and FQ resistance levels in MTB isolates. Only Yin et al. have shown conclusively that different substitutions of amino acid 94 resulted in different levels of levofloxacin resistance [17].

In this study, mutations of gyrA were proven to be the cause of primary OFX-resistance, but an analysis of relationships between different amino acid mutations in gyrA and the MICs of OFX-resistant MTB strains by ANOVA showed no significant differences among the different mutants. This suggests that different amino acid substitutions at codons 90, 91 or 94 in gyrA bring the similar level of OFX-resistance in MTB strains, but do not contribute different level of OFX-resistance. Sun et al [29] detected the OFX MICs of laboratory-selected OFX-resistant MTB strains but did not analyze the relationship between different amino acid mutations in gyrA and the MICs of OFX-resistant MTB strains. We did this analysis for laboratory-selected OFX-resistant MTB strains and clinical isolates by ANOVA based on the data from their study. Our analysis showed no significant difference in the relationship between the amino acid substitution and the OFX MIC for both laboratory-selected OFX-resistant MTB strains (F = 0.091, p = 0.997) and clinical isolates (F = 2.023, p = 0.080). This is consistent with our findings in this study. However, the conclusions from both this study and the one by Sun et al. were made on only the single amino acid modification in gyrA in OFX-resistant isolates. The relationship between two concurrent amino acid mutations in gyrA and the MICs of OFX-resistant MTB strains needs to be further investigated. Our findings differed from the results of the study by Yin et al. [13], which may have been due to the different optical conformation of OFX and levofloxacin leading to different mechanisms by which OFX and levofloxacin bind to DNA gyrase A. In this study, the gyrA S95T was detected in all OFX-susceptible isolates and OFX-resistant isolates as a natural polymorphism, and in fact gyrA S95T is a phylogenetically informative polymorphism [30].

Some reports have shown that a small number of FQ-resistant MTB isolates have mutations in the gyrB gene, including those at codons 485, 486, 500, 509, 521, 538, 539, 540, 543 550 and 577, amongst others according to the numbering system used in this study [10, 16, 17, 31, 32]. There were only a few gyrB mutations that were present in FQ-susceptible MTB isolates and little evidence exists to show that mutations in gyrB are related to FQ resistance. In this study, a 772 bp fragment of gyrB was sequenced that included the codons in which mutations have been reported [10, 17, 31, 32]. Some reported mutations, such as R485C and D500N [16, 17], were also identified in OFX-resistant MTB strains in this study, but weren't detected in OFX-susceptible strains. Moreover, two OFX-resistant MTB strains in this study only carry mutations in gyrB at codons 485 and 500, respectively, but not in gyrA; the same mutations were found in MTB clinical isolates from Uzbekistan, Vietnam and Thailand [16, 17, 31]. In this study, the OFX-resistant MTB strain with a mutation at codon 539 in gyrB had a mutation A90V in gyrA, which was also the case in Vietnam [17]. This suggested there may be a potential relationship between these two mutations in gyrA and gyrB in the mechanism of MTB resistance to OFX. This evidence also suggests that mutations at codons 485, 500 and 539 induce resistance to OFX.

The R485L mutation found in this study differed from the R485C mutation described by Feuerriegel et al. [17], which had polymorphisms within codon 485. In this current study, the novel mutation of codon 551 was identified in both OFX-resistant and OFX-susceptible MTB strains and the novel codon 549 mutation was identified in gyrB in OFX-susceptible MTB strains, which supported the hypothesis that the mutations at codons 549 and 551 are not related to OFX resistance in MTB strains. Although the data from this study suggested that the mutations at codons 549 and 551 seemed not to lead to the resistance to OFX in MTB isolates, it was not possible to hypothesize whether the same mutations would have importance in the resistance of other FQs. For example, one strain that has a N533T mutation in gyrB, was susceptible to OFX but resistant to moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin in the study by Groll et al [32]. Although the mutation sites in gyrB that relate to FQ resistance are still unclear in MTB strains, the present data show that OFX-resistant strains with mutations only in gyrA do not differ from OFX-resistant MTB strains with mutations in both gyrA and gyrB. In this study, the relationships between mutations in gyrB and OFX resistance in MTB isolates remain hypothetical. We are currently performing experiments, including cloning mutations in the reference strains, which will verify the effect of gyrB mutations on OFX resistance in MTB strains.

Conclusions

Our findings confirm that the susceptibility or resistance to OFX of most MTB strains can be determined by mutations in the QRDRs of gyrA and gyrB, but the level of resistance to OFX for OFX-resistant isolates could not be predicted based on the mutation patterns in the gyrA and gyrB genes. Furthermore, our findings indicate that not all the patterns of mutation in genes related to drugs reflect the resistance level of the corresponding drug for MTB drug-resistant isolates, whereas the patterns of gene mutations related to rifampicin and isoniazid resistance did reflect the resistance level of other drugs.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the grant 10QA1405800 from the Shanghai Rising-Star Program to Zhenling Cui. We are grateful to Dr. Sven Hoffner (Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control, Stockholm, Sweden) for his comments and suggestions during the preparation of this manuscript. We are grateful to all members of Shanghai Key Laboratory of Tuberculosis, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Medical School, Tongji University, for their knowledge, helpfulness, and willingness to share.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Tuberculosis, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Medical School, Tongji University

References

  1. World Health Organization. Guidelines for the programmatic management of drug resistant tuberculosis: WHO/HTM/TB/2006.361. Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  2. Ginsburg AS, Grosset JH, Bishai WR: >Fluoroquinolones, tuberculosis, and resistance. Lancet Infect Dis. 2003, 3: 432-442. 10.1016/S1473-3099(03)00671-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Jérémie Piton, Stéphanie Petrella, Marc Delarue, Gwénaëlle André-Leroux, Vincent Jarlier, Alexandra Aubry, Claudine Mayer: Structural Insights into the Quinolone Resistance Mechanism of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA Gyrase. PLoS One. 2010, 5: e12245-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Alexandra Aubry, Nicolas Veziris, Emmanuelle Cambau, Chantal Truffot-Pernot, Vincent Jarlier, Mark Fisher L: Novel Gyrase Mutations in Quinolone-Resistant and -Hypersusceptible Clinical Isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Functional Analysis of Mutant Enzymes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006, 50: 104-112. 10.1128/AAC.50.1.104-112.2006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Poissy J, Aubry A, Fernandez C, Lott MC, Chauffour A, Jarlier V, Farinotti R, Veziris N: Should moxifloxacin be used for the treatment of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis? An answer from a murine model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010, 54: 4765-71. 10.1128/AAC.00968-10.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Wang JY, Lee LN, Lai HC, Wang SK, Jan IS, Yu CJ, Hsueh PR, Yang PC: Fluoroquinolone resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates: associated genetic mutations and relationship to antimicrobial exposure. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007, 59: 860-865. 10.1093/jac/dkm061.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. WHO: The WHO/IUATLD Global Project on Anti-tuberculosis Drug Resistance Surveillance. Anti-tuberculosis drug resistance in the world (Report No.4). WHO/HTM/TB/2008.394. Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  8. World Health Organization: Report of the second meeting of the WHO Task Force on XDR-TB. WHO/HTM/TB/2008.403. Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  9. Zhao M, Li X, Xu P, Shen X, Gui X, Wang L, Deriemer K, Mei J, Gao Q: Transmission of MDR and XDR tuberculosis in Shanghai. China PLoS One. 2009, 4: e4370-10.1371/journal.pone.0004370.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Mokrousov I, Otten T, Manicheva O, Potapova Y, Vishnevsky B, Narvskaya O, Rastogi N: Molecular characterization of ofloxacin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains from Russia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008, 52: 2937-2939. 10.1128/AAC.00036-08.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Shi R, Zhang J, Li C, Kazumi Y, Sugawara I: Emergence of ofloxacin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates from China as determined by gyrA mutation analysis using denaturing high-pressure liquid chromatography and DNA sequencing. J Clin Microbiol. 2006, 44: 4566-4568. 10.1128/JCM.01916-06.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Van Doorn HR, An DD, de Jong MD, Lan NT, Hoa DV, Quy HT, Chau NV, Duy PM, Tho DQ, Chinh NT, Farrar JJ, Caws M: Fluoroquinolone resistance detection in Mycobacterium tuberculosis with locked nucleic acid probe real-time PCR. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2008, 12: 736-742.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Yin X, Yu Z: Mutation characterization of gyrA and gyrB genes in levofloxacin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates from Guangdong Province in China. J Infect. 2010, 61: 150-154. 10.1016/j.jinf.2010.05.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Zhao MC, Bao L, Wu YH, Long Y, Zeng XW, Zhang HD, Xie YX: Study on the gene mutation of quinolone resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolated from Sichuan Province. Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2004, 35: 313-315.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Brossier F, Veziris N, Aubry A, Jarlier V, Sougakoff W: Detection by GenoType MTBDRsl test of complex mechanisms of resistance to secondline drugs and ethambutol in multidrug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2010, 48: 1683-1689. 10.1128/JCM.01947-09.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Duong DA, Nguyen TH, Nguyen TN, Dai VH, Dang TM, Vo SK, Do DA, Nguyen VV, Nguyen HD, Dinh NS, Farrar J, Caws M: Beijing genotype of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is significantly associated with high-level fluoroquinolone resistance in Vietnam. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009, 53: 4835-4839. 10.1128/AAC.00541-09.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Feuerriegel S, Cox HS, Zarkua N, Karimovich HA, Braker K, Rüsch-Gerdes S, Niemann S: Sequence analyses of just four genes to detect extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis patients undergoing treatment. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009, 53: 3353-3356. 10.1128/AAC.00050-09.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Evans J, Segal H: Novel multiplex allele-specific PCR assays for the detection of resistance to second-line drugs in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010, 65: 897-900. 10.1093/jac/dkq047.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Guillemin I, Jarlier V, Cambau E: Correlation between quinolone susceptibility patterns and sequences in the A and B subunits of DNA gyrase in mycobacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998, 42: 2084-2088.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Van Embden JD, Cave MD, Crawford JT, Dale JW, Eisenach KD, Gicquel B, Hermans P, Martin C, McAdam R, Shinnick TM, SMALL PM: Strain identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by DNA fingerprinting: recommendations for a standardized methodology. J Clin Microbiol. 1993, 31: 406-409.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Benjamin WH, Lok KH, Harris R, Brook N, Bond L, Mulcahy D, Robinson N, Pruitt V, Kirkpatrick DP, Kimerling ME, Dunlap NE: Identification of a contaminating Mycobacterium tuberculosis strain with a transposition of an IS6110 insertion element resulting in an altered spoligotype. J Clin Microbiol. 2001, 39: 1092-1096. 10.1128/JCM.37.3.1092-1096.2001.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Bemer P, Palicova F, Rüsch-Gerdes S, Drugeon HB, Pfyffer GE: Multicenter evaluation of fully automated BACTEC Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube 960 system for susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2002, 40: 150-154. 10.1128/JCM.40.1.150-154.2002.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Rüsch-Gerdes S, Pfyffer GE, Casal M, Chadwick M, Siddiqi S: Multicenter laboratory validation of the BACTEC MGIT 960 technique for testing susceptibilities of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to classical second-line drugs and newer antimicrobials. J Clin Microbiol. 2006, 44: 688-692.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Kumar M, Khan IA, Verma V, Kalyan N, Qazi GN: Rapid, inexpensive MIC determination of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates by using microplate nitrate reductase assay. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2005, 53: 121-124. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2005.05.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Sreevatsan S, Pan X, Stockbauer KE, Connell ND, Kreiswirth BN, Whittam TS, Musser JM: Restricted structural gene polymorphism in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex indicates evolutionarily recent global dissemination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997, 94: 9869-9874. 10.1073/pnas.94.18.9869.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Huitric E, Werngren J, Juréen P, et al: Resistance levels and rpoB gene mutations among in vitro-selected rifampin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis mutants. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006, 50: 2860-2862. 10.1128/AAC.00303-06.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Kim SY, Park YJ, Kim WI, et al: Molecular analysis of isoniazid resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates recovered from South Korea. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2003, 47: 497-502. 10.1016/S0732-8893(03)00132-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Takiff HE, Salazar Takiff HE, Salazar L, Guerrero C, Philipp W, Huang WM, Kreiswirth B, Cole ST, Jacobs WR, Telenti A: Cloning and nucleotide sequence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis gyrA and gyrB genes and detection of quinolone resistance mutations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994, 38: 773-780.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Sun Z, Zhang J, Zhang X, Wang S, Zhang Y, Li C: Comparison of gyrA gene mutations between laboratory-selected ofloxacin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains and clinical isolates. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2008, 31: 115-121. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2007.10.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Comas I, Homolka S, Niemann S, Gagneux S: Genotyping of genetically monomorphic bacteria: DNA sequencing in Mycobacterium tuberculosis highlights the limitations of current methodologies. PLoS One. 2009, 4: e7815-10.1371/journal.pone.0007815.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Pitaksajjakul P, Wongwit W, Punprasit W, Eampokalap B, Peacock S, Ramasoota P: Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. Mutations in the gyrA and gyrB genes of fluoroquinolone-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis from TB patients in Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2005, 36: 228-237.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Von Groll A, Martin A, Jureen P, Hoffner S, Vandamme P, Portaels F, Palomino JC, da Silva PA: Fluoroquinolone resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis and mutations in gyrA and gyrB. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009, 53: 4498-4500. 10.1128/AAC.00287-09.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

    33. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/11/78/prepub

Copyright

© Cui et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement