Skip to main content

Trends of antimicrobial susceptibilities and multidrug-resistant colonization rate in patients transferred from long-term care facilities during 2017–2022: a cross-sectional study



With the global increase in the older population, the proportion of those receiving care in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) has also been increasing. We assessed the epidemiology, antibiotic susceptibility, and colonization status of drug-resistant organisms in patients transferred from LTCFs.


We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients transferred from LTCFs between 2017 and 2022. The reasons for admission, antimicrobial susceptibility, and colonization rates of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) were recorded. We analyzed the susceptibility and colonization rates by year to identify trends.


Of the 936 patients transferred from LTCFs, 54.3% were admitted to the intensive care unit and 12.5% died. The most common reason for admission was infection (n = 573, 61.2%), followed by gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 67, 7.2%) and cerebrovascular disorder (n = 65, 6.9%). A total of 452 Enterobacterales strains were isolated, and their susceptibility rates to ciprofloxacin and cefotaxime were 33.3% and 35.6%, respectively. A total of 54.9% were extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing strains, and 4.9% of them were carbapenem-resistant, both of which showed an increasing trend (P = 0.024 and P < 0.001, respectively). The prevalence rates of CRE, CRAB, and MRSA colonization were 9.2%, 7.1%, and 23.1%, respectively. CRE colonization showed a significant increase (P < 0.001), with carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales accounting for 75.9% of cases.


Patients transferred from LTCFs are primarily affected by infections and exhibit high resistance rates. The increasing trend in CRE colonization rates each year highlights the need for the implementation of rigorous infection control measures for effective management.

Peer Review reports


Many countries worldwide have entered an era of an aging society and are making efforts to address the needs of their older populations [1]. Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) are institutions where individuals who require assistance, such as medical care or rehabilitation therapy, because of old age or underlying health conditions, can receive the necessary care. In Korea, more than 18.5% of the total population is aged 65 years or older, marking the onset of an aging society [2]. It is estimated that by 2050, approximately 45% of the total population will be aged 65 or older [2]. Consequently, the number of individuals using LTCFs is anticipated to increase annually.

One of the main causes of transfer from LTCFs to acute care hospitals is infection [3]. Patients transferred from LTCFs often have compromised immune systems owing to age or underlying health conditions, making the early use of antibiotics particularly crucial for prognosis [4]. Access to antibiogram data is essential to ensure the appropriate early use of antibiotics. In domestic LTCFs, antibiograms for all admitted patients are limited; therefore, regular updates are required.

LTCFs can serve as reservoirs for multidrug-resistant organisms, particularly carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) [5]. Surveillance studies conducted on patients transferred from LTCFs in South Korea between 2016 and 2017 revealed a low prevalence of CRE, with a rate of only 1.4%; none of these cases involved carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) [6]. Additionally, in a study conducted during 2018–2019, there were no cases of CRE [7]. Given the global increase in multidrug-resistant organisms, it may be necessary to assess changes in the patterns of CRE colonization and develop plans for selective screening of patients transferred from LTCFs to establish appropriate infection control measures [8,9,10].

In this study, we aimed to assess the epidemiology and antibiotic susceptibility of patients transferred from LTCFs. Additionally, we analyzed the colonization status of drug-resistant organisms. Based on these results, we aimed to understand the fundamental characteristics of patients transferred from LTCFs, establish a rationale for the appropriate selection of initial antibiotics for infections, and provide a foundation for infection control measures.

Materials and methods

Study design and population

This study was conducted from 2017 to 2022 at a 573-bed university hospital in South Korea. To assess the epidemiology and antibiotic susceptibility of patients transferred from LTCFs, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients transferred from LTCFs. This study included cases in which patients were transferred from LTCFs to the main hospital via the satellite emergency department, whereas those admitted from LTCFs owing to coronavirus disease (COVID-19) were excluded. Only the first admission was included in the analysis of the patients with multiple admissions.

Data collection and data analysis

A retrospective analysis of the patients’ electronic medical records (EMRs) was conducted to review sex, age, and underlying medical conditions. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was calculated. Reasons for admission, length of hospital stay, admission to the intensive care unit, and mortality were investigated. The reasons for admission, including possible infection, were validated by a physician based on a review of the admission records and clinical symptoms documented in the EMR.

The culture results of the patients at the time of admission were reviewed. Blood, sputum, urine, and other samples were collected. The decision regarding specimen collection and choice of specimen site for testing, carried out when infection was suspected, were also determined by the primary physician. In the case of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species (CoNS), Propionibacterium spp., and Corynebacterium spp., only two or more subsequent blood cultures showing the same bacterial species with identical antibiograms were included in the analysis. The antibiotic sensitivity of the cultured strains was determined. For Enterobacterales, the presence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) and carbapenem resistance was also determined. Carbapenem resistance was determined based on resistance to any of the carbapenem antibiotics, including ertapenem, imipenem, and meropenem. In cases where Proteus spp., Morganella spp., and Providencia spp. exhibited intrinsic resistance to imipenem, they were considered resistant if they exhibited resistance to any other type of carbapenem besides imipenem. The antibiotic sensitivity of ESBL-producing Enterobacterales was further analyzed using subgroup analysis. Carbapenem resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii was also assessed. Methicillin resistance was determined for Staphylococcus species (Staphylococcus aureus and CoNS).

The institution recommended CRE colonization testing for patients transferred from LTCFs. Additionally, for patients admitted to the intensive care unit, colonization testing for carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) is performed. This study determined the results of CRE, MRSA, and CRAB colonization tests conducted within 48 h of admission.

An additional analysis was conducted of patients from whom CRE, CRAB, or MRSA species were cultured in clinical specimens to determine CRE, CRAB, or MRSA colonization status, respectively.

Microbiologic data

The bacterial species were identified using the VITEK MS system (BioMérieux, Marcy-l’Etoile, France). The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the antibiotics were determined using the VITEK 2 system (BioMérieux). The results were interpreted according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [11, 12]. Isolated microorganisms were classified as susceptible, intermediate-resistant, or resistant to certain antibiotics according to the CLSI recommendations. For Enterobacterales isolates nonsusceptible to carbapenem (based on an MIC of > 0.5 μg/mL for ertapenem or an MIC of > 1 μg/mL for imipenem or meropenem), the modified Hodge test and carbapenemase inhibition test were used for CPE detection.

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables are presented as frequencies and proportions, whereas continuous variables are presented as medians (interquartile ranges [IQRs]). The chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare categorical variables. The trends in pathogens and their antimicrobial susceptibility according to year were analyzed using the Cochran–Armitage trend test. A P-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using R software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).


Study population and clinical information

Throughout the study period, a total of 2,443 patients were transferred, among whom 1,326 originated from LTCFs. Patients with COVID-19 were excluded from the analysis, resulting in a final cohort of 1,110 patients. After removing duplicate cases, 936 patients were ultimately included in the analysis. The median age of the included patients was 79 (IQR: 71–85) years, and 404 (43.1%) patients were males (Table 1). The median CCI score was 5 (IQR: 4–6). When analyzing the reasons for admission, infection was the most common reason (n = 573, 61.2%), followed by gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding (n = 67, 7.2%), cerebrovascular disorder (n = 65, 6.9%), and orthopedic disorder (n = 43, 4.6%) (Table 1). Among these infections, pneumonia was the most frequent (n = 287, 50.1%), followed by urinary tract infection (UTI) (n = 173, 30.2%), GI infection (n = 31, 5.2%), and biliary tract infection (n = 28, 4.9%). Among the patients, 508 (54.3%) were admitted to the intensive care unit, and 117 (12.5%) died during hospitalization.

Table 1 Baseline and clinical characteristics of the study population (N = 936)

Isolated microorganisms according to specimen and antimicrobial susceptibility

Among the patients analyzed, blood, urine, and sputum cultures were obtained in 703 (75.1%), 688 (73.5%), and 412 (43.0%) patients, respectively. In the blood cultures, 123 (17.5%) yielded positive culture results, with 59 g-positive bacteria and 64 g-negative bacteria (Table 2). The most commonly cultured pathogen was Escherichia coli (n = 39, 31.7%), followed by CoNS (n = 32, 26.0%), S. aureus (n = 18, 14.6%), and Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 9, 7.3%). In the urine cultures, 369 cultures (53.6%) showed bacterial growth, with Enterobacterales being predominant in 263 cases (71.3%). E. coli was the most commonly isolated bacterium (n = 159, 43.1%), followed by Enterococcus spp. (n = 42, 11.4%). Sputum cultures yielded bacterial growth in 229 cases (55.6%). K. pneumoniae was the most frequently isolated bacterium (n = 54, 23.6%), followed by P. aeruginosa (n = 50, 21.8%) and A. baumannii (n = 36, 15.7%).

Table 2 Isolated microorganisms according to specimens

In total, 452 Enterobacterales isolates were obtained during the study period. The susceptibility rates of ciprofloxacin and cefotaxime against Enterobacterales were 33.3% and 35.6%, respectively (Fig. 1a–b). The susceptibility rates of cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam were 62.7% and 79.0%, respectively, whereas that of ertapenem was 95.1%. Trend analysis of Enterobacterales susceptibility testing involving 11 antimicrobial agents revealed a significant decrease in susceptibility over the 6-year study period for 5 antimicrobials. Specifically, the susceptibility decreased from 47.7% to 36.2% (P = 0.046) for ampicillin/sulbactam, from 65.2% to 35.8% (P < 0.001) for ceftazidime, from 80.0% to 35.8% (P < 0.001) for cefepime, from 95.5% to 85.1% (P < 0.001) for ertapenem, and from 98.0% to 86.5% (P < 0.001) for imipenem. Carbapenem resistance was observed in 4.9% of cases The rate of carbapenem resistance in Enterobacterales increased significantly over the 6-year period, from 3.0% in 2017 to 14.9% in 2022 (P < 0.001). Carbapenem resistance varied according to the specimen type, with rates of 4.9% in blood cultures, 3.0% in urine cultures, and 7.6% in sputum cultures. Regarding ESBL results from the 426 samples, 54.9% (n = 234) were ESBL-producing strains at the time of admission. The proportion of ESBL-producing strains showed an increasing trend over the 6-year period, starting at 36.9% in 2017 and reaching 60.4% in 2022 (P = 0.024). The susceptibility rates of the ESBL-producing strains to various antibiotics were as follows: amikacin, 86.1%; piperacillin/tazobactam, 73.0%; sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, 44.5%; cefepime, 43.7%; ampicillin/sulbactam, 28.8%; and ciprofloxacin, 13.9%.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Antimicrobial susceptibility and ESBL-producing rate according to years in Enterobacterales isolates. a Overall antimicrobial susceptibilities and (b) trend of antimicrobial susceptibilities in Enterobacterales isolates from 2017 to 2022. Susceptibilities to ampicillin/sulbactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, and ertapenem significantly decreased according to years (P = 0.046, P < 0001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.013, respectively). Abbreviations: CIP, ciprofloxacin; CTX, cefotaxime; SAM, ampicillin/sulbactam; TMP/SMX, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; GEN, gentamicin; CAZ, ceftazidime; FEP, cefepime; TZP, piperacillin/tazobactam; AMK, amikacin; ETP, ertapenem; IPM, imipenem; ESBL, extended spectrum b-lactamase

Among P. aeruginosa isolates, 52.0% exhibited susceptibility to ceftazidime, whereas 52.0% showed carbapenem resistance. Among A. baumannii isolates, 90.2% exhibited carbapenem resistance (See Supplementary Fig. 1, Additional File 1).

Of the 99 S. aureus and CoNS isolates, 78.8% were methicillin-resistant (MRSA or MR-CNS). The prevalence of methicillin resistance showed a decreasing trend (P = 0.005) (See Supplementary Fig. 1, Additional File 1).

Results of active surveillance for colonization

CRE colonization testing was conducted in 855 (91.3%) patients, whereas colonization testing for CRAB and MRSA was conducted in 450 (48.1%) patients. The prevalence rates of CRE, CRAB, and MRSA colonization were 9.2%, 7.1%, and 23.1%, respectively (Table 3). When observed on a yearly basis, CRE colonization showed a significant increase, starting at 2.5% in 2017 and increasing to 26.1% in 2022 (P < 0.001). CPE accounted for 75.9% of CRE cases. The rates of CRAB and MRSA colonization did not show consistent trends over time (P = 0.189 and P = 0.969, respectively).

Table 3 Prevalence of drug-resistant organism colonization

Colonization status in patients with clinically resistant pathogens

Among the 54 patients with both MRSA status and colonization results available, the colonization rate was significantly higher among patients with MRSA infections than among those with non-MRSA infections (59.1% vs. 40.9%, P = 0.001). Among the 207 patients with both CRE status and colonization results available, the colonization rate was significantly higher among patients with CRE infections cultured than among those with non-CRE infections (91.7% vs. 8.3%, P < 0.001). Among the 44 patients with both CRAB status and colonization results available, the colonization rate did not differ significantly among those with CRAB and non-CRAB infections (66.7% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.065).


In this study, we analyzed the epidemiology and antibiotic susceptibility of patients transferred from LTCFs. Globally, antibiotic resistance has become a substantial concern, and admission to LTCFs is recognized as a risk factor [13, 14]. In South Korea, there is a lack of data on antibiotic resistance rates among patients transferred from LTCFs; these data are crucial for appropriate antibiotic selection during initial treatment. Moreover, the increasing number of patients with antibiotic resistance highlights the importance of infection control of multidrug-resistant organisms in acute care medical facilities, emphasizing the need for up-to-date prevalence data.

In this study, the patients transferred from LTCFs had a median age of 79 years, indicating an older population. Their CCI scores were also high (5 points), signifying a high burden of underlying conditions. Given that 54.3% of the patients were admitted to the intensive care unit, those transferred from LTCFs had a higher severity level, with a mortality rate of 12.5%. The primary reasons for admission were infections, pneumonia, and UTI, which accounted for over 80% of all infections. Considering that patients from LTCFs, who are part of the high-risk group, are frequently admitted primarily because of infections, there should be increased emphasis on infection prevention in LTCFs. Although the complete prevention of infections in LTCFs may be challenging, it is crucial to implement preventive measures such as appropriate suction, catheter management, and infection control to reduce the risk of nosocomial infections in such settings.

It can be asserted that the selection of initial antibiotics for infections in high-risk groups is even more critical. Among patients transferred from LTCFs, Enterobacterales, with E. coli being the most prevalent, were commonly isolated. Cefotaxime susceptibility in Enterobacterales isolates was observed in only 35.6%, with over 50% being ESBL-producing strains. According to Kor-GLASS results, the resistance of E. coli to cefotaxime was 36.0% from 2017 to 2019 [15]. Kim et al. reported a susceptibility of 68.0% to cefotaxime in E. coli, and 33.1% of ESBL-producing strains were cultured from community-onset UTIs in 2017 [16]. Another study showed that in LTCFs, the resistance rate of E. coli to cefotaxime gradually increased, reaching 70% in 2018 [17]. When considering our results in conjunction with those of previous studies, it becomes apparent that the resistance rate and proportion of ESBL-producing strains in LTCFs are higher than those in the general population, and this trend is increasing.

Enterobacterales are the predominant causative pathogens of UTIs and intra-abdominal infections, with some isolates from sputum cultures. When dealing with infections from these sources, particularly in patients transferred from LTCFs, it is necessary to consider the possibility of ESBL-producing strains. Although carbapenems are the primary choice of antibiotics for ESBL-producing strains, piperacillin/tazobactam can be considered as an alternative in situations where carbapenem use is problematic owing to carbapenem resistance, given its susceptibility of over 70% against ESBL-producing strains. Although the clinical efficacy of piperacillin/tazobactam may vary, it can be a viable choice for treating UTIs when clinical improvement is observed [18,19,20]. Indeed, initial empirical treatment options, such as ciprofloxacin or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, might have limitations or may not be the preferred choice owing to resistance. Considering the resistance rates to oral antibiotics, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole may be a viable option because of its higher susceptibility to oral antibiotics.

The susceptibility of P. aeruginosa to ceftazidime was 50%, whereas resistance to carbapenems was observed in over 50% of the cases. This is more than twice the figure from domestic data from 2017 to 2019, where 22.1% exhibited carbapenem resistance [15].

Although A. baumannii had a lower frequency of isolation, the fact that over 90% of the isolated strains showed carbapenem resistance in culture was significant. This result aligns closely with that of Kor-GLASS, which reported a carbapenem resistance rate of 91.2% for A. baumannii [15]. Therefore, even if antibiotic susceptibility results are not available, carbapenem resistance should be considered when A. baumannii is identified in the culture at a clinically relevant frequency.

Globally, there is a trend of decreasing MRSA infections [21]. We also observed a similar trend in the methicillin resistance rates of S. aureus and CoNS in clinical specimens, consistent with findings from domestic Kor-GLASS data. The exact reasons for this decrease are not clear. However, one contributing factor could be the strengthening of infection control measures worldwide and decolonization [22, 23]. Additionally, changes in the characteristics of prevalent MRSA clones may play a role in this decrease [24].

The prevalence of CRE, particularly CPE, is low among patients transferred from LTCFs in Korea [6]. In another CRE surveillance study, no CRE cases were identified [7]. This raises questions regarding the cost-effectiveness of implementing active surveillance for CRE. However, the number of reported CRE cases has been increasing annually in South Korea [25]. The findings of this study further emphasize the increasing trend in CRE colonization rates over the years, starting at 1.7% in 2017 and reaching 20% by 2022. CPE has become more prevalent in South Korea, reaching approximately 61.9% by 2020 [26]. In this study, CPE accounted for 75.9% of all CRE cases. This significant increase underscores the importance of ongoing active surveillance of CRE colonization in patients transferred from LTCFs. Isolating patients with potential for contagion can be helpful in preventing the spread of infections. However, in Korea, hospital rooms are typically shared, making it difficult to isolate most patients transferred from LTCFs owing to factors such as being bedridden. Therefore, implementing individual isolation rooms for all patients could be restricted. Hence, the emphasis on horizontal precautions becomes crucial. Until the results are available, it should be emphasized to exercise caution and follow infection control measures, especially for potential CRE colonizers.

This study had several limitations. First, this was a single-center, retrospective investigation. Second, all results from cultures conducted at the time of admission were analyzed, regardless of whether infection was suspected. Although it is not possible to definitively attribute cultured organisms as the cause of infection, these cultures are typically conducted in patients with fever or suspected infection. Hence, it is reasonable to consider these cultured organisms as potential pathogens. Even if they are not the causative pathogens of infections, the presence of these organisms indicates the risk of future infection, making it valuable to assess their resistance profiles for clinical decision-making. This study provides the latest information on antibiotic resistance rates among LTCF referrals to a single hospital in South Korea; therefore, nationwide research is needed in the future.


Patients transferred from LTCFs were mostly affected by infections, predominantly due to Enterobacterales. Owing to the high resistance rates, caution is necessary when selecting the initial antibiotics for infections. The increasing trend in CRE colonization rates each year highlights the need for the implementation of rigorous infection control measures for effective management.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analyzed in the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.



Charlson’s comorbidity index


Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute


Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species


Coronavirus disease


Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales


Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii


Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales


Electronic medical records


Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases




Interquartile range


Long-term care facilities


Minimal inhibitory concentrations


Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus


Urinary tract infections


  1. Ritchie H, Roser M. Age structure; 2019. Our World Data. Accessed 4 Oct 2023.

  2. Korean Statistical Information Service. Elderly population rate. Accessed 4 Oct 2023 (in Korean).

  3. Yun SY, Lim JY, Kim E, Oh J, Lee DH. Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of older patients transferred from long-term-care hospitals (LTCHs) to emergency departments by a comparison with non-LTCHs in South Korea: A cross-sectional observational study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:8879.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Gavazzi G, Krause KH. Ageing and infection. Lancet Infect Dis. 2002;2:659–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lim CJ, Cheng AC, Kennon J, Spelman D, Hale D, Melican G, et al. Prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms and risk factors for carriage in long-term care facilities: a nested case–control study. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69:1972–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hwang JH, Park JS, Lee E, Bae JY, Song KH, Choe PG, et al. Active surveillance for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, vancomycin-resistant enterococci and toxigenic Clostridium difficile among patients transferred from long-term care facilities in Korea. J Hosp Infect. 2018;99:487–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jeong H, Kang S, Cho HJ. Prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms and risk factors for carriage among patients transferred from long-term care facilities. Infect Chemother. 2020;52:183–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Marimuthu K, Venkatachalam I, Khong WX, Koh TH, Cherng BPZ, Van La M, et al. Clinical and molecular epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae among adult inpatients in Singapore. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64(supple_2):S68-75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Edward R. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae – Second update. 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chen B, Berglund B, Wang S, Börjesson S, Bi Z, Nilsson M, et al. Rapid increase in occurrence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in healthy rural residents in Shandong Province, China, from 2015 to 2017. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2022;28:38–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 26th ed. Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 31st ed. Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National infection & death estimates for AR; 2022. Accessed 4 Oct 2023.

  14. World Health Organization. Antimicrobial resistance; 2021. Nov. 17. Accessed 4 Oct 2023.

  15. Kim D, Choi MH, Hong JS, Shin JH, Jeong SH. Current status and prospects of the national antimicrobial resistance surveillance system, kor-GLASS. Korean J Healthcare Assoc Infect Control Prev. 2022;27:96–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim YJ, Lee JM, Cho J, Lee J. Change in the annual antibiotic susceptibility of Escherichia coli in community-onset urinary tract infection between 2008 and 2017 in a tertiary care hospital in Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2019;34:e228.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee GW, Ryu S, Park J, Lee EJ, Lee KJ, Tae J, et al. Changes of antibiotic prescribing pattern and its resistance to E. coli in South Korea: a 12-year retrospective observational study. Sci Rep. 2021;11:5658.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. IDSA. Guidance on the treatment of antimicrobial resistant gram-negative infections; 2023. Accessed 4 Oct 2023.

  19. Son SK, Lee NR, Ko JH, Choi JK, Moon SY, Joo EJ, et al. Clinical effectiveness of carbapenems versus alternative antibiotics for treating ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae bacteraemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018;73:2631–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tamma PD, Han JH, Rock C, Harris AD, Lautenbach E, Hsu AJ, et al. Carbapenem therapy is associated with improved survival compared with piperacillin-tazobactam for patients with extended-spectrum β-lactamase bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60:1319–25.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Centers for disease control and prevention. Current HAI progress report. 2020 national and state healthcare-associated infections progress reports. Centers for disease control and prevention website. Accessed 5 Feb 2024.

  22. Popovich KJ, Aureden K, Ham DC, Harris AD, Hessels AJ, Huang SS, et al. SHEA/IDSA/APIC Practice Recommendation: Strategies to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission and infection in acute-care hospitals: 2022 Update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023;44:1039–67.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Huang SS, Singh R, McKinnell JA, Park S, Gombosev A, Eells SJ, et al. Decolonization to reduce postdischarge infection risk among MRSA carriers. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:638–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Dai Y, Liu J, Guo W, Meng H, Huang Q, He L, et al. Decreasing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections is attributable to the disappearance of predominant MRSA ST239 clones, Shanghai, 2008–2017. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2019;8:471–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee E, Lee S, Yoon S, Lee Y. Number of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections in Rupublic of Korea (2018-2020). Weekly Health Dis. 2021;14(39):2765–72 (in Korean).

  26. Infectious disease homepage. Korean Disease Control and Prevention Agency. Accessed 4 Oct 2023 (in Korean).

Download references


Not applicable.


Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



YBS conceptualized and edited the manuscript. JJP contributed to the data curation, data analysis, and manuscript writing. JL, SHN, and HJP contributed to data acquisition. All the authors have read and approved this manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu Bin Seo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital (IRB number: 2022–05-038). The requirement for informed consent was waived owing to the retrospective nature of the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplementary Fig. 1.

Trends of antibiotics resistance. Further analysis of antimicrobial resistance trend are shown.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, J.J., Park, H., Na, S.H. et al. Trends of antimicrobial susceptibilities and multidrug-resistant colonization rate in patients transferred from long-term care facilities during 2017–2022: a cross-sectional study. BMC Infect Dis 24, 235 (2024).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: