Skip to main content
Download PDF

Bacterial shedding and serologic responses following an outbreak of Salmonella Typhi in an endemic cohort

BMC Infectious Diseases volume 23, Article number: 416 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi (Salmonella Typhi) is the cause of typhoid fever. Salmonella Typhi may be transmitted through shedding in the stool, which can continue after recovery from acute illness. Shedding is detected by culturing stool, which is challenging to co-ordinate at scale. We hypothesised that sero-surveillance would direct us to those shedding Salmonella Typhi in stool following a typhoid outbreak.

Methods

In 2016 a typhoid outbreak affected one in four residents of a Nursing School in Malosa, Malawi. The Department of Health asked for assistance to identify nursing students that might spread the outbreak to other health facilities. We measured IgG antibody titres against Vi capsular polysaccharide (anti-Vi IgG) and IgM / IgG antibodies against H:d flagellin (anti-H:d) three and six months after the outbreak. We selected participants in the highest and lowest deciles for anti-Vi IgG titre (measured at visit one) and obtained stool for Salmonella culture and PCR. All participants reported whether they had experienced fever persisting for three days or more during the outbreak (in keeping with the WHO definitions of ‘suspected typhoid’). We tested for salmonellae in the Nursing School environment.

Results

We obtained 320 paired serum samples from 407 residents. We cultured stool from 25 residents with high anti-Vi IgG titres and 24 residents with low titres. We did not recover Salmonella Typhi from stool; four stool samples yielded non-typhoidal salmonellae; one sample produced a positive PCR amplification for a Salmonella Typhi target. Median anti-Vi and anti-H:d IgG titres fell among participants who reported persistent fever. There was a smaller fall in anti-H:d IgG titres among participants who did not report persistent fever. Non-typhoidal salmonellae were identified in water sampled at source and from a kitchen tap.

Conclusion

High titres of anti-Vi IgG did not identify culture-confirmed shedding of Salmonella Typhi. There was a clear serologic signal of recent typhoid exposure in the cohort, represented by waning IgG antibody titres over time. The presence of non-typhoidal salmonellae in drinking water indicates sub-optimal sanitation. Developing methods to detect and treat shedding remains an important priority to complement typhoid conjugate vaccination in efforts to achieve typhoid elimination.

Peer Review reports

Background

It is estimated that 1.5 million cases of typhoid fever occurred in Africa (excluding North Africa) in 2017 [1]. Whilst this figure represents a fall in incidence estimates from 1990, localised outbreaks [2,3,4,5] map closely to the emergence of genotypes associated with multi-drug resistance (MDR) [6]. Mathematical modelling suggests such outbreaks may be driven by increased transmissibility associated with drug resistant phenotypes [7]. Where Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi (Salmonella Typhi) is inadequately treated, ongoing shedding is more likely; it is important to detect this in order to break the transmission cycle.

Although stool culture remains the standard test to identify Salmonella Typhi shedding, it lacks sensitivity [8]. The relative contribution of temporary shedders to ongoing transmission remains unclear, but is likely to play a larger role in high incidence settings [9, 10].

Serology has been used to complement an outbreak investigation in countries where typhoid is not endemic, resulting in candidate shedders being successfully identified by high anti-Vi antibody titre (anti-Vi IgG) followed by isolation of Salmonella Typhi in stool [11, 12]. Anti-Vi antibody titres have been used in attempts to identify carriers in endemic populations (outside of the context of an outbreak), but have led to little recovery of Salmonella Typhi [13,14,15]. Antibody to flagellin (anti-H:d) is a component of the Widal test, and has been proposed as a possible diagnostic marker for typhoid fever [16,17,18,19]. Anti-H:d has not previously been evaluated in the context of identifying shedding. To our knowledge, this is the first study to apply these antibody markers to identifying shedding after an outbreak in a country where typhoid is endemic.

In June 2016 an outbreak of febrile illness occurred in Malosa, Malawi. Nine patients presenting to the local hospital had blood culture-confirmed typhoid fever. Cases were traced to a local primary school, secondary school and a residential nursing school. Over the next month the District Health Office identified 101/407 nursing school residents who met the clinical case definition for probable typhoid fever.

Our primary objective was to identify nursing school residents shedding Salmonella Typhi after the outbreak, using serology to target subsequent testing of high-risk individuals. We focussed our efforts on the nursing school because students continuing to shed Salmonella Typhi might transmit typhoid to other healthcare institutions when they dispersed for work placements. Secondary objectives were to identify any environmental source of Salmonella Typhi within the nursing school and to explore serologic responses to typhoid exposure, as determined by self-reported, persistent fever.

Methods

We performed a prospective observational study comprising two study visits, conducted three and six months after the Malosa outbreak.

Any person over 18 years of age who had been resident in the nursing school between 1st June 2016 and 31st August 2016 was eligible to participate. We enrolled participants and conducted study visit one simultaneously in October 2016, three months after the outbreak.

We collected a blood sample from each participant and completed a structured case record. This included self-report of whether the participant had a persistent fever (defined as lasting three or more days) during the outbreak. Those who reported persistent fever were considered to have been “suspected typhoid” cases based on the WHO case finding definition [20].

We identified participants whose three-month anti-Vi IgG levels were in the top 10% of the cohort and participants whose anti-Vi IgG were in the lowest 10% of the cohort. These participants were approached and asked to provide a stool sample. Samples were collected between the three- and six-month study visits, after anti-Vi IgG results became available. Stool was sent for culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing.

The cohort was approached again in January 2017, six months after the outbreak. A further blood sample was obtained for repeat serology.

Laboratory procedures

We determined anti-Vi IgG antibody concentration using a commercial Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions (VaccZyme™ The Binding Site, Birmingham, UK). We derived antibody concentration in ELISA units/ml (EU/ml) from the optical density using a standardised curve-fitting logistic method.

Anti-H:d IgM and IgG were performed at the Oxford University Clinical Research Unit in Vietnam, using in-house ELISAs, as previously described [21].

Stool samples were collected in sterile sample pots and transferred to the laboratory on the same day. Stool was pre-enriched in Selenite broth at 37˚C for 18–24 h before being sub-cultured on xylose lysine deoxyxholate (XLD) agar. Single colonies from XLD were sub-cultured on MacConkey and sheep blood agar (SBA) plates. Colonies from SBA plates were used for biochemical tests. Analytical Profile Index (API 20E) tests were used for Salmonella identification. Following the White-Kauffmann-Le Minor scheme, serotyping was done using polyvalent O and H, O4, O9, Hd, Hg, Hi, Hm, and Vi antisera (Pro-Lab Diagnostics).

PCR testing was used alongside routine culture to increase the yield from stool. DNA was extracted from Selenite broth pre-enriched stool specimens using QIAamp Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen). A pan Salmonella PCR targeting the ttr gene, encoding tetrathionate reductase, and a multiplex PCR with a pan-Salmonella invasion A gene, S. Typhi fimbriae gene, and the kit’s internal control were performed [22, 23].

Environmental sampling

Malosa Dam provides water for the nursing school and secondary school via a gravity fed water pipe feeding in to a holding tank. The water is reportedly chlorinated daily after leaving the holding tank.

We took 36 environmental samples, in-duplicate, over two days. These comprised stool from food-handlers, food and tap water from the kitchens and water from the dam. Samples were cultured and sero-typed as described above.

Statistical methods

We treated serologic data as a metric continuous variable, and our surrogate measure of typhoid exposure as dichotomous (fever for ≥ 3 days or not).

We tested continuous variables for normality using the Shapiro-Wilks test before and after log-transformation. We used nonparametric tests where data were not normally distributed.

We used paired significance tests to compare change in antibody titre within the population as a whole and change in antibody titre depending upon whether the case definition for suspected typhoid had been met. We used unpaired significance tests to compare antibody titres between participants who did and did not meet the case definition for suspected typhoid at each study visit. Only participants who submitted serum at three and six months contributed to paired analyses.

Statistical analyses were carried out using the free to use, open source statistical package ‘R’ version 4.1.1 [24]. The significance threshold was set at 0.05 for all tests.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

All participants were adults aged 18 years or more. We ensured that participant information materials were available in English and Chichewa languages. We obtained written informed consent from each enrolled participant, which included consent for the described laboratory analyses. Our protocol stated that participants who were stool culture positive for Salmonella Typhi would be advised to take either 28 days of ciprofloxacin or 14 days of azithromycin with the aim of eradicating carriage and preventing onward transmission, but this proved not to be necessary. We conducted study procedures in accordance with a protocol approved by the Malawi College of Medicine Research Ethics Committee, P.10/16/2043.

Results

We recruited 374 participants from a total population of 407 nursing school residents. 368 participants submitted blood samples three months post outbreak. 320 participants submitted blood at three months and six months. We obtained stool samples from 25 to 36 participants whose anti-Vi IgG response was in the highest decile, and from 24 to 36 participants whose anti-Vi IgG response was in the lowest decile. The characteristics of included participants are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of participants, self-reported symptoms in those with and without suspected typhoid, and antibody titres amongst those with and without suspected typhoid at visits one and two
Full size table

Stool culture

Of 49 participants who submitted stool for culture, none were culture positive for Salmonella Typhi in stool. Four participants had Salmonella spp. in stool on routine culture, and all four of these samples produced a positive amplification of the ttr PCR target. Although we performed serotyping according to the Kauffman-Le minor scheme, the eventual classification recorded was that these were non-typhoidal salmonellae – the serotype data is not available. Three of these participants were in the lowest decile for anti-Vi IgG level at visit one, one was in the highest decile (Fig. 1).We did not recover viable Salmonella Typhi from any of the stool samples collected. One stool sample produced a positive amplification of the Salmonella Typhi fimbriae gene target on multiplex PCR. The participant that produced this sample had the highest three-month anti-Vi IgG and anti-H:d IgG titres among participants submitting stool (Supplemental Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

A. Log anti-Vi IgG concentration at the three month visit among participants from whom Salmonella spp. was cultured (purple) compared to culture-negative participants(turquoise). B. log anti-H:d IgM concentration at the three month visit among participants from whom Salmonella spp. was cultured (green) compared to culture-negative participants(red). C. log anti-H:d IgG concentration at the three month visit among participants from whom Salmonella spp. was cultured (brown) compared to culture-negative participants (black)

Full size image

Antibody responses

Among participants reporting persistent fever there was a significant fall in anti-Vi IgG between three and six months (median titre 8.08 to 3.7 EU/ml (p = < 0.001, Wilcoxon signed rank test). This was not true of participants who did not report persistent fever (median titre 3.7 to 3.7 EU/ml, p = 0.12, Wilcoxon signed rank test) (Fig. 2.)

Fig. 2
figure 2

A. log anti-Vi IgG concentration amongst participants with persistent fever, comparing titres at 3 months (lilac) and 6 months (turquoise) post-outbreak. B. log anti-Vi IgG concentration amongst participants without persistent fever, comparing titres at 3 months (lilac) and 6 months (turquoise) post-outbreak. C. log anti-H:d IgM concentration amongst participants with persistent fever, comparing titres at 3 months (beige) and 6 months (yellow) post-outbreak. D. log anti-H:d IgM concentration amongst participants without persistent fever, comparing titres at 3 months (beige) and 6 months (yellow) post outbreak. E. log anti-H:d IgG concentration amongst participants without persistent fever, comparing titres at 3 months (green) and 6 months (purple) post-outbreak. F. log anti-H:d IgM concentration amongst participants without persistent fever, comparing titres at 3 months (green) and 6 months (purple) post-outbreak. All graphs: red crossbar shows median antibody concentration; brackets show p-values (Wilcoxon signed rank test)

Full size image

Among participants with persistent fever there was a significant fall in anti-H:d IgG between three and six months (median titre 87.8 to 77.4 EU/ml (p = < 0.001, Wilcoxon signed rank test). Among participants without persistent fever, there was also a significant fall in anti-H:d IgG between three and six months (median titre 82.4 to 79.2 EU/ml, p = 0.006, Wilcoxon signed rank test) (Fig. 2.)

There was no significant change in anti-H:d IgM between three and six months, either among those with persistent fever (median titre 55.2 to 54.2 EU/ml (p = 0.33, Wilcoxon signed rank test) or without persistent fever (median titre 52.1 to 55.3 EU/ml (p = 0.42, Wilcoxon signed rank test). (Fig. 2.)

Environmental sampling

Non-typhoidal salmonellae were identified from tap water in the kitchen of the nursing school and in water from Malosa dam. No S. Typhi was identified.

Discussion

Our study shows that, even in a population where there had been a recent outbreak of typhoid fever, sero-surveillance could not identify culture-confirmed shedding of Salmonella Typhi. Sero-surveillance combined with PCR may have identified one participant shedding Salmonella Typhi. Anti-Vi IgG titres fell amongst participants reporting persistent fever during the outbreak. Anti-H:d IgG titres fell amongst participants with and without persistent fever. There was no change in anti-H:d IgM, irrespective of fever status. We did not find an environmental reservoir of Salmonella Typhi, but non-typhoidal salmonellae were present in water samples from the reservoir supplying the nursing school, and a tap in the kitchen. The presence of these bacteria indicate contamination and under-treatment of the water supply, and cast suspicion that this could have been a route through which the outbreak was sustained. Feedback from this investigation has resulted in more robust chlorination procedures.

Our study population was young (mean 23.5 years). Although we did not formally ascertain this, biliary pathology is rare in sub-Saharan Africa [25]. A similar study design might have detected Salmonella Typhi shedding amongst an older cohort, or in an endemic setting where rates of biliary disease are high. 140 of 156 participants meeting the case definition for ‘suspected typhoid’ received antibiotics, compared with 16 of 212 not meeting the case definition – it is likely that antibiotic administration reduced the amount of Salmonella Typhi that could be recovered post-outbreak. Our study design was contingent upon how swiftly ethical approval could be obtained after the outbreak. Thus, we selected three months for the first study visit, given that the immediate serologic signal caused by recent enteric fever would have started to settle, enabling us to identify participants with persistently elevated antibody titres attributable to ongoing shedding. It may be that we would have identified acute temporary shedding (shedding occurring within three months of illness)[10] if we had taken stool samples at an earlier time-point, but this would not have allowed us to test our hypothesis that presently elevated antibody titre was associated with ongoing shedding. Unfortunately, the serotypes of the non-typhoidal salmonellae we recovered from stool and from water were not recorded, and we can only state that they were non-typhoidal salmonellae (Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica).

Participants from the Nursing College were on clinical placement in multiple institutions across Southern Malawi. This led to participants being lost to follow up between 3 and six months. Given the intermittent nature of shedding, several samples over time would have increased our chances of detecting Salmonella Typhi by culture. Another approach (had resource allowed) would have been to take a stool sample from all participants, regardless of antibody titre, and thence investigate the difference in titres between culture confirmed shedders with that of the rest of the cohort. One participant was identified as having PCR amplification of the fimbriae target. This suggests that they may have been carrying / shedding Salmonella Typhi, but this could not be verified through culture confirmation. This participant had the highest anti-Vi IgG and anti-H:d IgG titres of all those who submitted stool.

Although we have no pre-outbreak serologic data to base this on, antibody titres to our selected antigens are likely to have risen and peaked around six weeks after the outbreak [26]. As described by Voysey and Pollard, decreases in antibody concentrations provide serologic evidence of infection [27]. This is supported by the fall in anti-Vi IgG (amongst those with suspected typhoid) and the cohort-wide fall in anti-H:d IgG between three and six months. Anti-H:d IgG has been shown to fall swiftly after controlled human infection, and this may explain why the signal was observed across the cohort for this antigen but only in those with suspected typhoid for the Vi antigen [19]. The static anti-H:d IgM concentration suggests that any change in titre precipitated by the outbreak has been and gone at three months.

The Vi (virulence) antigen comprises a polysaccharide expressed on the surface of Salmonella Typhi, as well as Salmonella Paratyphi C, Citrobacter freundii and Salmonella Dublin [28, 29]. IgG antibodies to the Vi antigen have been detected in high titres among microbiologically confirmed shedders of Salmonella Typhi [13, 30, 31]. Salmonella Typhi shedders have been identified through their high anti-Vi titre in the context of two outbreaks in the United States [11, 12]. Yet the role of anti-Vi IgG for population screening for Typhoid shedding remains unclear: a 2004 study obtained sera from 3209 adults in a Typhoid-endemic area (Vietnam). Multiple rectal swabs were taken from 103 participants with the highest anti-Vi IgG titres at different time points: no Salmonella Typhi was isolated [14]. Although we obtained fewer faecal specimens, our study population had known recent exposure to typhoid. The paucity of Salmonella Typhi detection in both settings suggests that anti-Vi IgG might be elevated for reasons other than biliary carriage, such as cross-reactivity with other bacteria that express the Vi antigen, or convalescence from acute typhoid fever. It is plausible that both factors would be more significant in areas of the world where typhoid fever is endemic, explaining the geographical discrepancy. A Chilean study comparing anti-Vi IgG amongst bacteriologically proven Salmonella Typhi carriers and healthy control subjects and those with acute typhoid fever supports our finding that anti-Vi IgG is a non-specific marker in an endemic setting: although the authors demonstrated higher antibody titre among the shedders, one quarter of chronic carriers did not have a high anti-Vi IgG titre [13]. There was no licensed typhoid vaccine in Malawi at the time that our study was conducted. We are therefore confident that our cohort’s serologic responses have not been impacted by prior immunisation.

Flagellin proteins comprise the bacterial flagellum, which is used for motility – predominantly by Gram-negative bacteria [32]. Flagellin epitopes are distinct among Salmonella serovars, which is why they may be used in serotyping [33]. Elevated anti-H IgG titres have been found amongst people infected by other Salmonella spp., other Enterobacteriaceae, and even Staphylococcus aureus [34, 35]. In our study, we show elevated titres of anti-H:d IgG amongst participants with and without persistent fever (although the fall between visit one and two was statistically greater amongst those with persistent fever). In our study setting, it is likely that participants will have been exposed to other Enterobacteraciae and Salmonella spp., which may explain why we observed elevated anti-H:d titres across the cohort. This illustrates the difficulty of using serology to identify shedding in endemic settings – a combination of antigens may be more specific.

A recent study utilising culture confirmed carriers who underwent cholecystectomy in Nepal found 13 putative antigens in sera that were expressed highly in the carrier state, and which might bear closer scrutiny in future studies looking for shedding [36]. Future studies should focus on robust microbiological confirmation of Salmonella Typhi shedding status to provide clear comparators for prospective serologic markers. The detection of carriers will require repeated stool sampling over time, and newer PCR techniques may increase sensitivity over culture alone [22, 37].

Despite the success of conjugate typhoid vaccines in preventing typhoid cases, indirect protection is yet to be demonstrated [38]. Wider public health measures, including identifying those who continue to shed Salmonella Typhi after infection, remain key to reducing transmission and to ultimately eradicating typhoid.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Stanaway JD, Reiner RC, Blacker BF, Goldberg EM, Khalil IA, Troeger CE, et al. The global burden of typhoid and paratyphoid fevers: a systematic analysis for the global burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19(4):369–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Feasey NA, Gaskell K, Wong V, Msefula C, Selemani G, Kumwenda S, et al. Rapid emergence of multidrug resistant, H58-lineage Salmonella typhi in Blantyre, Malawi. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(4):e0003748.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Davis WW, Chonzi P, Masunda KP, Shields LM, Mukeredzi I, Manangazira P, et al. Notes from the field: typhoid fever outbreak—Harare, Zimbabwe, October 2016–March 2017. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67(11):342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hendriksen RS, Leekitcharoenphon P, Lukjancenko O, Lukwesa-Musyani C, Tambatamba B, Mwaba J, et al. Genomic signature of multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi isolates related to a massive outbreak in Zambia between 2010 and 2012. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53(1):262–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lutterloh E, Likaka A, Sejvar J, Manda R, Naiene J, Monroe SS, et al. Multidrug-resistant typhoid fever with neurologic findings on the Malawi-Mozambique border. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54(8):1100–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Park SE, Pham DT, Boinett C, Wong VK, Pak GD, Panzner U, et al. The phylogeography and incidence of multi-drug resistant typhoid fever in sub-saharan Africa. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pitzer VE, Feasey NA, Msefula C, Mallewa J, Kennedy N, Dube Q, et al. Mathematical modeling to assess the drivers of the recent emergence of typhoid fever in Blantyre, Malawi. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61(suppl4):251–S8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Braddick MR, Crump BJ, Yee ML. How long should patients with Salmonella typhi or Salmonella paratyphi be followed-up? A comparison of published guidelines. J Public Health. 1991;13(2):101–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Luxemburger C, Duc CM, Lanh MN, Wain J, Hien TT, Simpson JA, et al. Risk factors for typhoid fever in the Mekong delta, southern Viet Nam: a case-control study. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2001;95(1):19–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Crump JA. Progress in typhoid fever epidemiology. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;68(Supplement1):4–S9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lin F, Becke J, Groves C, Lim B, Israel E, Becker E, et al. Restaurant-associated outbreak of typhoid fever in Maryland: identification of carrier facilitated by measurement of serum vi antibodies. J Clin Microbiol. 1988;26(6):1194–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Engleberg N, Barrett T, Fisher H, Porter B, Hurtado E, Hughes J. Identification of a carrier by using vi enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay serology in an outbreak of typhoid fever on an indian reservation. J Clin Microbiol. 1983;18(6):1320–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Lanata C, Ristori C, Jimenez L, Garcia J, Levine M, Black R, et al. Vi serology in detection of chronic Salmonella typhi carriers in an endemic area. The Lancet. 1983;322(8347):441–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gupta A, Thanh NM, Olsen S, Sivapalasingam S, Trinh TM, Lan NP, et al. Evaluation of community-based serologic screening for identification of chronic Salmonella typhi carriers in Vietnam. Int J Infect Dis. 2006;10(4):309–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Khanam F, Darton TC, Meiring JE, Sarker PK, Biswas PK, Bhuiyan MAI et al. Salmonella Typhi stool shedding by enteric fever patients and asymptomatic chronic carriers in an endemic urban setting. J Infect Dis. 2021.

  16. Parry CM, Wijedoru L, Arjyal A, Baker S. The utility of diagnostic tests for enteric fever in endemic locations. Expert Rev anti-infective therapy. 2011;9(6):711–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sadallah F, Brighouse G, Del-Giudice G, Drager-Dayal R, Hodne M, Lambert PH. Production of specific monoclonal antibodies to Salmonella typhi flagellin and possible application to immunodiagnosis of typhoid fever. J Infect Dis. 1990;161(1):59–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Calderón I, Lobos SR, Rojas HA, Palomino C, Rodríguez LH, Mora GC. Antibodies to porin antigens of Salmonella typhi induced during typhoid infection in humans. Infect Immun. 1986;52(1):209–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Darton TC, Baker S, Randall A, Dongol S, Karkey A, Voysey M, et al. Identification of novel serodiagnostic signatures of typhoid fever using a Salmonella proteome array. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1794.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. WHO. Typhoid and other invasive salmonellosis. Vaccine-preventable Diseases Surveillance Standards. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Thieu NTV, Van TT, Tuan AT, Klemm EJ, Minh CNN, Vinh PV, et al. An evaluation of purified Salmonella Typhi protein antigens for the serological diagnosis of acute typhoid fever. J Infect. 2017;75(2):104–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chirambo AC, Nyirenda TS, Jambo N, Msefula C, Kamng’ona A, Molina S et al. Performance of molecular methods for the detection of Salmonella in human stool specimens. Wellcome open research. 2020;5.

  23. Msefula CL, Olgemoeller F, Jambo N, Segula D, Van Tan T, Nyirenda TS, et al. Ascertaining the burden of invasive Salmonella disease in hospitalised febrile children aged under four years in Blantyre, Malawi. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13(7):e0007539.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Team RC. R: a language and environment for statsistical computing. 4.1.0 ed. Vienna. Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ndong A, Gaye N, Tendeng J, Diao M, Diallo A, Niang F, et al. Profile of patients with gallstone disease in a sub-saharan african general surgery Department: a retrospective cohort study protocol. Int J Surg Protocols. 2021;25(1):61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Traggiai E, Puzone R, Lanzavecchia A. Antigen dependent and independent mechanisms that sustain serum antibody levels. Vaccine. 2003;21:35–S7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Voysey M, Pollard AJ. Seroefficacy of vi polysaccharide–tetanus toxoid typhoid conjugate vaccine (Typbar TCV). Clin Infect Dis. 2018;67(1):18–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gunn JS, Marshall JM, Baker S, Dongol S, Charles RC, Ryan ET. Salmonella chronic carriage: epidemiology, diagnosis, and gallbladder persistence. Trends Microbiol. 2014;22(11):648–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Hu X, Chen Z, Xiong K, Wang J, Rao X, Cong Y. Vi capsular polysaccharide: synthesis, virulence, and application. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2017;43(4):440–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nolan CM, Feeley JC, White PC Jr, Hambie EA, Brown SL, Wong K-H. Evaluation of a new assay for vi antibody in chronic carriers of Salmonella typhi. J Clin Microbiol. 1980;12(1):22–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Losonsky GA, Ferreccio C, Kotloff KL, Kaintuck S, Robbins J, Levine M. Development and evaluation of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for serum vi antibodies for detection of chronic Salmonella typhi carriers. J Clin Microbiol. 1987;25(12):2266–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Hajam IA, Dar PA, Shahnawaz I, Jaume JC, Lee JH. Bacterial flagellin—a potent immunomodulatory agent. Exp Mol Med. 2017;49(9):e373–e.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Ramachandran G, Tennant SM, Boyd MA, Wang JY, Tulapurkar ME, Pasetti MF, et al. Functional activity of antibodies directed towards flagellin proteins of non-typhoidal Salmonella. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(3):e0151875.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Pokhrel BM, Karmacharya R, Mishra SK, Koirala J. Distribution of antibody titer against Salmonella enterica among healthy individuals in nepal. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2009;8(1):1–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Levine MM, Grados O, Gilman RH, Woodward WE, Solis-Plaza R, Waldman W. Diagnostic value of the Widal test in areas endemic for typhoid fever. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1978;27(4):795–800.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Charles RC, Sultana T, Alam MM, Yu Y, Wu-Freeman Y, Bufano MK, et al. Identification of immunogenic Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi antigens expressed in chronic biliary carriers of S. Typhi in Kathmandu, Nepal. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7(8):e2335.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Nair S, Patel V, Hickey T, Maguire C, Greig DR, Lee W, et al. Real-time PCR assay for differentiation of typhoidal and nontyphoidal Salmonella. J Clin Microbiol. 2019;57(8):e00167–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Qadri F, Khanam F, Liu X, Theiss-Nyland K, Biswas PK, Bhuiyan AI, et al. Protection by vaccination of children against typhoid fever with a Vi-tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine in urban Bangladesh: a cluster-randomised trial. The Lancet. 2021;398(10301):675–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research was supported by a grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The funder played no part in the design of the study or in collecting, analysing and interpreting the data, or in producing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

    Peter I. Johnston & Melita A. Gordon

  2. Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi

    Peter I. Johnston, Patrick Bogue, Maurice Mbewe, Reenesh Prakash, Vanessa Kandoole-Kabwere, Rebecca Lester, Melita A. Gordon & James E. Meiring

  3. Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi

    Angeziwa Chunga Chirambo

  4. Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK

    Thomas Darton & James E. Meiring

  5. Cambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Disease, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

    Stephen Baker

Authors
  1. Peter I. Johnston
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Patrick Bogue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Angeziwa Chunga Chirambo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Maurice Mbewe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Reenesh Prakash
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Vanessa Kandoole-Kabwere
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Rebecca Lester
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Thomas Darton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Stephen Baker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Melita A. Gordon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. James E. Meiring
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

P.J analysed data, wrote the main manuscript text and produced all figures. P.B, A.W, M.M, R.P, V.K, R.L contributed to study design, data collection and laboratory analyses. S.B undertook anti-H:d antibody assays and contributed to manuscript revisions. T.D advised on data analysis and contributed to manuscript revisions. MG was key to study design and procuring funding. Her group undertook data collection and laboratory analyses (other than anti-H:d) J.M contributed to study design, data acquisition and analysis, and manuscript revision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter I. Johnston.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

All participants were adults aged 18 years or more. We ensured that participant information materials were available in English and Chichewa languages. We obtained written informed consent from each enrolled participant, which included consent for the described laboratory analyses. Our protocol stated that participants who were stool culture positive for S. Typhi would be advised to take either 28 days of ciprofloxacin or 14 days of azithromycin with the aim of eradicating carriage and preventing onward transmission, but this proved not to be necessary. We conducted study procedures in accordance with a protocol approved by the Malawi College of Medicine Research Ethics Committee, P.10/16/2043.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplemental Figure 1 A

. Log anti-Vi IgG concentration at the three month visit among participants who did and did not amplify the fimbriae PCR target from stool. Green coloured dots represent participants who were culture-negative for Salmonella spp. from stool, turquoise coloured dots represent those who were culture-positive for Salmonella spp from stool. B. log anti-H:d IgM at the three month visit among participants who did and did not amplify the fimbriae PCR target from stool. Yellow coloured dots represent participants who were culture-negative for Salmonella spp. from stool, purple coloured dots represent those who were culture-positive for Salmonella spp from stool. C. log anti-H:d IgG at the three month visit among participants who did and did not amplify the fimbriae PCR target from stool. Orange coloured dots represent participants who were culture-negative for Salmonella spp. from stool, grey coloured dots represent those who were culture-positive for Salmonella spp from stool.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Johnston, P.I., Bogue, P., Chirambo, A.C. et al. Bacterial shedding and serologic responses following an outbreak of Salmonella Typhi in an endemic cohort. BMC Infect Dis 23, 416 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08385-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08385-8

Keywords

BMC Infectious Diseases

ISSN: 1471-2334

Contact us