Skip to main content
Download PDF

Virulence genes distributed among Staphylococcus aureus causing wound infections and their correlation to antibiotic resistance

BMC Infectious Diseases volume 22, Article number: 652 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Staphylococcus aureus causes many human infections, including wound infections, and its pathogenicity is mainly influenced by several virulence factors.

Aim

This study aimed to detect virulence genes (hla, sea, icaA, and fnbA) in S. aureus isolated from different wound infections among Egyptian patients admitted to Minia University Hospital. This study also aimed to investigate the prevalence of these genes in methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), and vancomycin-resistant S. aureus isolates and the resistance and sensitivity to different antibiotic classes.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was carried out from November 2019 to September 2021. Standard biochemical and microbiological tests revealed 59 S. aureus isolates. The Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method was used to determine antibiotic susceptibility. DNA was extracted using a DNA extraction kit, and polymerase chain reaction was used to amplify all genes.

Results

A total of 59 S. aureus isolates were detected from 51 wound samples. MRSA isolates accounted for 91.5%, whereas MSSA isolates accounted for 8.5%. The multidrug resistance (MDR) percentage in S. aureus isolates was 54.2%. S. aureus showed high sensitivity pattern against vancomycin, linezolid, and chloramphenicol. However, a high resistance pattern was observed against oxacillin and piperacillin. sea was the most predominant gene (72.9%), followed by icaA (49.2%), hla (37.3%), and fnbA (13.6%). sea was the commonest virulence gene among MRSA isolates (72.2%), and a significant difference in the distribution of icaA was found. However, sea and icaA were the commonest genes among MSSA isolates (79.9%). The highest distribution of sea was found among ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates (95.2%).

Conclusion

The incidence of infections caused by MDR S. aureus significantly increased with MRSA prevalence. sea is the most predominant virulence factor among antibiotic-resistant strains with a significant correlation to piperacillin, gentamicin, and levofloxacin.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The fundamental goal of the skin is to keep microbial populations on its surface under control and prevent diseases from colonizing the underlying tissue [1]. A wound is a disruption in the skin’s protective action [2]. Staphylococcus aureus is the most frequent opportunistic bacteria, causing many superficial and life-threatening infections [3]. It can cause various disorders, including skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs), invasive infections, and toxin-mediated disorders [4]. Since it produces several virulence factors and acquires multidrug resistance (MDR) to various antibacterial agents, it is a major infectious agent in communities and hospitals [5].

S. aureus has an incredible ability to develop resistance rapidly. Environmental factors and cell membrane disruption or DNA damage can influence the fast development of antibiotic resistance [6]. More than 90% of S. aureus is resistant to penicillin, which remains a global issue [7]. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) is a common inhabitant of a large part of the healthy population and can cause a wide range of illnesses, from minor skin infections to life-threatening diseases [8] The MDR is defined as acquired non-susceptibility to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories [9, 10]. The MDR of S. aureus strains has been linked to longer hospital stays, higher mortality rates, and concomitant costs [11].

The presence of many virulence factors, such as surface proteins, biofilms, exoenzymes, exotoxins, and exfoliative toxins, is linked to the ability of S. aureus to cause different infections. All these factors allow bacteria to attach to tissues, causing pathogenesis, and to penetrate the immune system, causing toxicity [12]. One of the virulence factors of S. aureus is a cytolytic, pore-forming toxin, such as α-hemolysin, which is involved in the pathogenesis of S. aureus [13]. Many S. aureus strains, particularly MRSA, release one or more distinct staphylococcal exotoxins, including staphylococcal enterotoxins [14], the most important pathogenic components belonging to the superantigen family [15].

The ability of the microorganism to successfully persist within the hospital and community and several cell wall-associated adhesive molecules, such as fnb (encoding fibronectin-binding protein) is responsible for the possibility of severe animal and human diseases [16, 17]. The ability of S. aureus to build biofilms is linked to the antimicrobial resistance mechanism. Invasion isolates are more likely to form biofilm than healthy individual carriage isolates [18] The polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA) is the most important component of biofilm [19, 20]. The N-acetylglucosamyl transferase enzyme responsible for PIA synthesis is known to be encoded by icaA [21].

S. aureus persists and spreads by acquiring antibiotic resistance genes. Identification of S. aureus virulence genes is important for evaluation of disease development. This study focused on S. aureus virulence genes and to detect their correlation to antimicrobial resistance patterns.

Materials and methods

Study area, design, and population

A cross-sectional study was carried out from November 2019 to September 2021 in Minia University Hospital (Minia, Egypt). Wound samples were collected from the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. The samples were properly labeled, indicating the source, sex, and age of the patient. Ethical clearance for the study was granted by Minia University Hospital.

Collection of wound pus samples

Bacterial samples were collected from patients having wound infections present on admission to the outpatient clinic and cultured onto nutrient agar, mannitol salt agar, and DNase agar. All media were produced by Oxoid (England) and prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cultures were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h to be examined the next day.

Isolation and identification of wound bacterial isolates

The primary identification of bacterial isolates was based on colonial appearance, pigmentation, morphology, Gram staining, and biochemical characteristics. The biochemical tests applied were the standard catalase test, coagulase (tube and slide) test, and DNase test (Fig. 1). For the extended storage of bacterial isolates, preservation in 20% glycerol vials at − 70 °C was carried out.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart of study procedures

Full size image

Antibiotic sensitivity testing

Antimicrobial sensitivity was determined by the Kirby-Bauer agar disc diffusion method according to the Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI; 2018). Antibiotic discs were used with the following drug concentrations: linezolid (30 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg), rifampin (5 μg), piperacillin (100 μg), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (30 μg), ampicillin/sulbactam (20 μg), levofloxacin (5 μg), gentamycin (10 μg), vancomycin (30 μg), oxacillin (1 μg), and ciprofloxacin (5 μg) were applied onto Müller-Hinton agar (Himedia). The plates were aerobically incubated at 37 °C for 24 h, and the diameter of the inhibition zones was measured (in mm). The results were compared to that of the CLSI.

DNA extraction and detection of virulence genes

DNA was extracted using a DNA extraction kit (Qiagen, Germany), and the procedures were carried out according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The oligonucleotide primers used in this study were for the detection of genes encoding α-hemolysin (hla), staphylococcal enterotoxin A (sea), intracellular adhesion A (icaA), and fibronectin-binding protein A (FnbA). Table 1 lists the primer sequences (Metabione, Germany) of this study, and Table 2 presents the conditions of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products. The PCR products were resolved by electrophoresis on 1% agarose gel, and electrophoresis was carried out at a constant current of 50 mA for 30 min. DNA bands were visualized by ethidium bromide staining and ultraviolet transillumination light. The size of the fragments was determined by comparing their migration to a 100 bp ladder as a standard.

Table 1 The list of primers sequences
Full size table
Table 2 Conditions of PCR products
Full size table

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using χ2 using SPSS version 16 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A χ2 test was used to test the association between S. aureus virulence genes and participant's gender and age as well as with the antibiotic resistance profile. Similarly, the association between the antibiotic resistance profile with participant's gender and age groups was detected. The results were considered statistically significant when P ≤ 0.05.

Results

Prevalence of S. aureus isolates according to gender, age, and sample source

A total of 59 S. aureus isolates were detected from 51 different wound samples. The incidence of S. aureus was much higher in males [n = 36 (70.6%)] than in females [n = 15 (29.4%)]. Patients were classified into different age groups from 1 month to 60 years (mean ± standard deviation, 28.98 ± 16.95). The highest prevalence of S. aureus was observed in the age group between 1 and 20 years (45.1%), followed by patients in the age group between 41 and 60 years (29.4%) and finally patients in the age group from 21 to 40 years (25.5%). Figure 2 shows that the highest number of samples was from accidental wounds, such as animal bites, occupational injuries, a sharp tool, or car accidents (n = 38; 74.5%), followed by seven samples of burn infection (burning agents, such as flame, scald, electrical, boiled water, and chemical reagent; 13.7%). Three samples were from surgical wounds (5.9%) and three samples were from ulcers and abscess discharge (5.9%).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Prevalence of S. aureus isolated from patients from different types of wound infections

Full size image

Antimicrobial sensitivity testing

Table 3 shows that MRSA isolates accounted for 91.5%, whereas methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) isolates accounted for 8.5%. S. aureus had low resistance to chloramphenicol (10.2%), vancomycin (13.5%), and linezolid (16.9%). Moderate (intermediate) resistance was recorded against gentamycin (33.9%), levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin (both 35.6%), rifampin (37.3%), and tetracycline (62.7%). High resistance was observed against oxacillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, ampicillin/sulbactam (all 91.5%), and piperacillin (100%). The MDR in S. aureus isolates was 54.2%. S. aureus had R0 = 0%, R1 = 20.3%, R2 = 23.7%, R3 = 16.9%, R4 = 13.6%, R5 = 16.9%, R6 = 1.7%, R7 = 3.4%, and R8 = 1.7% (R0 represents the number of isolates sensitive to all antimicrobial classes tested, whereas R = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 represent isolates resistant to 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 antibiotic classes, respectively). No statistically significant difference was detected between the resistance profile of tested antibiotics and participant’s gender or age group (p > 0.05) (Tables 4 and 5).

Table 3 Antibiotic sensitivity profile of S. aureus isolates
Full size table
Table 4 Correlation between antibiotic resistance profile and patients’ gender
Full size table
Table 5 Correlation between antibiotic resistance profile and patients age groups
Full size table

Detection of virulence genes

To test the virulence genes of the isolates in this study, hla, sea, icaA, and fnbA were detected by PCR amplification. Table 6 shows that sea was the most predominant in 72.9% of the isolates. icaA was found in 49.2% of the isolates, followed by hla (37.3% of the isolates) and fnbA (13.6% of the isolates). Amplicon sizes of 209, 120, 770, and 1279 bp were considered positive for the presence of hla, sea, icaA, and fnbA, respectively. Figure 3 shows hla, sea, icaA, and fnbA PCR amplification products among S. aureus isolates, respectively. sea was the commonest virulence gene among MRSA and vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRSA) isolates (72.2% and 62.5%, respectively). However, sea and icaA were the commonest genes among MSSA isolates (80%; Table 6).

Table 6 Frequencies of virulence genes among MRSA, MSSA and VRSA strains
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

Detection of amplification product of different virulence genes: A hla gene by PCR; lane 1: negative control, lane 2: positive control and lanes 3 to 10: positive PCR products (209 bp); B sea gene by PCR; lane 1: positive control, lane 2: negative control and lanes 3 to 11: positive PCR products (120 bp); C icaA gene by PCR; lane 1: positive control, lane 2: negative control and lanes 3 to 10: positive PCR products (770 bp); D fnbA gene by PCR; lanes 1 to 7: positive PCR products (1279 bp), lane 8: positive control and lane 9: negative control

Full size image

A significant correlation was observed between virulence genes (hla, sea and icaA) and patients age groups (P < 0.05). While no statistically significant difference was detected between the tested virulence genes and participant’s gender (Table 7).

Table 7 Correlation between virulence genes and patients gender and age groups
Full size table

sea was the commonest virulence gene among antibiotic-resistant and antibiotic-sensitive isolates, followed by icaA, hla, and fnbA. The highest distribution of sea was among the ciprofloxacin (95.2%)-, gentamycin (89.9%)-, and tetracycline (75.7%)-resistant isolates. At the same time, the highest distribution of sea was among oxacillin (79.9%)-, linezolid (75.5%)-, and rifampin (73.5%)-sensitive isolates (Table 8).

Table 8 Correlation between S. aureus virulence genes and antibiotic resistance
Full size table

A statistically significant correlation (P < 0.05) was detected between the presence and absence of hla and sea and piperacillin, gentamicin, and levofloxacin resistance and sensitivity. However, a significant difference in the distribution of icaA was found among β-lactam-resistant and β-lactam-sensitive isolates. fnbA was significantly associated with piperacillin and ciprofloxacin resistance and sensitivity (Table 8). Table 9 shows that sea and icaA had the highest coexistence (40.7%), followed by sea and hla (21.9%).

Table 9 Coexistence of virulence genes among S. aureus isolates
Full size table

Discussion

S. aureus is the commonest pathogenic bacteria found in different wound specimens [22, 23]. Muluye et al. [24] stated that the prevalence of S. aureus in males and females was 38.1% and 28.7%, respectively. The first result was much lower than in this study, whereas the second was similar to this study. Patients were classified into different age groups from 1 month to 60 years. The highest prevalence of S. aureus (45.1%) and examined virulence genes were observed in the age group between 1 and 20 years. In the same time, there is a significant association between tested virulence genes and patients age groups. Torpy et al. [25] stated that the high prevalence of S. aureus in the age group between 1 and 20 years was because most young males (< 20 years) in the country have traditionally worked in occupations such as agriculture, construction, transportation, and industries, all of which are likely to expose them to trauma and different wound infections.

In this study, the highest prevalence of S. aureus was found in trauma and accidental wound infections, similar to other studies [26, 27], suggesting that the rate of S. aureus isolates in open wound infection was 76.9%, similar to these findings.

The predominant isolate S. aureus was sensitive to vancomycin (100%) [28], supporting the findings that considered vancomycin as one of the drugs with high susceptibility pattern against S. aureus. The same study revealed that S. aureus showed a high level of resistance to penicillin and oxacillin (84.6% and 76.9%, respectively). Although these results were lower, they supported this study. They considered piperacillin and oxacillin as drugs with high resistance patterns against S. aureus along with ampicillin/sulbactam and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid.

Linezolid is an efficient antibiotic for treating S. aureus infections among four burn centers [23], in agreement with this study. The sensitivity rate of chloramphenicol against S. aureus was 71.2%, similar to another study [29] that showed a 68.4% sensitivity rate for chloramphenicol. The notable sensitivity of S. aureus to vancomycin, linezolid, and chloramphenicol could be linked to a lower use of these antibiotics due to their shortage availability in the market, high costs, and toxic side effects [30].

Many studies showed a high MRSA prevalence in wound infections [31] and reported a high rate of MRSA and VRSA (44.6% and 61.5%, respectively). The finding for MRSA was lower than in this study, whereas the findings for VRSA were much higher. Moreover, the MRSA results in this study disagreed with Bessa et al. [22], who suggested that 21.8% of S. aureus was resistant to oxacillin. This study also revealed a remarkable increase in MRSA compared to a previous study by Ahmed et al. [32], who reported a 24% MRSA prevalence in the same hospital 10 years ago. This raised the alarm about the escalating and noticeable increase in MRSA prevalence in Egypt. The increase of MRSA in wound infections has contributed to high treatment costs and longer hospital stays, which have major implications for infection management, particularly in developing countries. These findings contribute to a worrying situation in the Minia Government regarding MRSA expansion. The necessity for more detailed molecular epidemiologic surveillance studies on MRSA and VRSA in the next years is critical.

The MDR of S. aureus isolates was 54.2%, similar to other studies [33, 34], which reported 54.9% and 47.9%, respectively. However, another study [28] stated that S. aureus showed 94.8%, higher than this study. Low activity of commonly used antibiotics, such as amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, ampicillin/sulbactam, oxacillin, and piperacillin, may be due to increased consumption of a particular class of antibiotics, resulting in resistance due to mutation(s) at drug target sites or the disruption of drug accumulation in the cytoplasm caused by cell wall rearrangement [31,32,33,34,35,36]. As a result, they are no longer effective in treating wound infections.

The incidence of some major virulence indicators of S. aureus in wound specimens was examined in this study. This study concentrated on a small number of genes linked to S. aureus pathogenicity. These genes (hla, sea, icaA, and fnbA) were chosen because they were the most frequent in aggressive isolates. These targeted genes spread across the isolates after PCR amplification. Furthermore, the bulk of the isolates demonstrated a wide range of gene combinations, indicating that the study sample has a level of genetic diversity.

Antimicrobial resistance and virulence factor genes showed significant relationships in this study. This finding could be explained by the proximity location of the resistance gene to the virulence gene [31, 37].

The predominant virulence and inducible resistance genes in MRSA and MSSA isolates were related to sea [38, 39]. All previous studies supported this study because sea is the commonest among MRSA and MSSA isolates. Cavalcante et al. [40] reported that the prevalence of sea in S. aureus isolates collected from infected skin lesions of atopic dermatitis children was 76.4% in total S. aureus isolates, 73.9% in MRSA isolates, and 78.1% in MSSA isolates, in agreement with this study. Li et al. [41] reported that the frequency of sea in S. aureus isolates from SSTIs in children was 0%, which was totally opposite to this study.

PCR investigation revealed that hla was found in 30.5% of 85 S. aureus isolated from various clinical sources [42], close to the present findings. The prevalence of icaA in MRSA was 60.3% [43], which was slightly higher than the present data. The prevalence of fnbA was 4.9% and 19.9% in MRSA and MSSA strains, respectively [44]. The prevalence of fnbA in MRSA was close to this study, whereas fnbA in MSSA was much lower than in the present data. Another study [45] suggested that the incidence of fnbA in wound swabs was 28.8%, which was slightly higher than the present results. The prevalence of fnbA and icaA in burn units was 2.9% and 44.9%, respectively [46]. fnbA was slightly lower than in this study, whereas the percentage of icaA was similar to the present data. The incidence of fnbA in MRSA and MSSA strains was 15.5% and 36.9%, respectively. However, the incidence of icaA in MRSA and MSSA was 84.5% and 78.3%, respectively [38]. The percentages of fnbA were similar to this study. However, the percentage of icaA was much higher in MRSA but was similar to the present data in MSSA. The prevalence of sea was 11.8% in amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and oxacillin susceptibility samples, 9.2% in rifampin, 0% in penicillin, 88.2% in chloramphenicol, and 100% in vancomycin [47]. The first three percentages were much lower than in this study. However, the percentages of chloramphenicol and vancomycin were slightly higher than in this study. The percentage of the coexistence of sea and hla was 36.9% [17], which was slightly higher than in this study.

The limitation of this study was the inability to detect more virulence genes and express the chosen virulence factors by molecular typing of the isolates (Additional file 1, Additional file 2).

Conclusions

Within the limitations of the current study, it can be concluded that the challenging, increasingly difficult, and widespread bacterial resistance to antibiotics has developed, the incidence of infections caused by MDR S. aureus has increased. The prevalence of CA-MRSA was high among patients with various wound infections. Bacterial resistance profile was the least against vancomycin and linezolid effective antibiotics. The correlation between CA-MRSA strain virulence genes distribution and antibiotic resistance profile showed high incidence of sea and icaA genes. All virulence genes were significantly distributed among piperacillin resistant isolates. β-lactam resistant isolates showed a significant correlation with IcaA virulence gene. After the emergence of high percentage of sea among ciprofloxacin resistant isolates, we expect that more genes will appear in future studies regarding S. aureus virulence genes. Therefore, the spread of bacterial resistance must be monitored in hospitals by using antibacterial agents properly to avoid more complications and to keep the empirical medications as effective as they are.

Availability of data and materials

The data sets generated and/or analyzed during this study are not publicly available due to privacy but are available from the corresponding author (A.E.F.) on reasonable request.

References

  1. Ndip RN, Takang A, Echakachi CM, Malongue A, Akoachere J, Ndip LM, Luma HN. In-vitro antimicrobial activity of selected honeys on clinical isolates of Helicobacter pylori. Afr Health Sci. 2007;7(4):228–32.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Leaper D, Harding K. Wounds: biology and management. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tong SY, Davis JS, Eichenberger E, Holland TL, Fowler VG Jr. Staphylococcus aureus infections: epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015;28(3):603–61.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Morell EA, Balkin DM. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a pervasive pathogen highlights the need for new antimicrobial development. Yale J Biol Med. 2010;83(4):223–33.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Gauliard E, Ouellette SP, Rueden KJ, Ladant D. Characterization of interactions between inclusion membrane proteins from Chlamydia trachomatis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2015;5:13.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. McCallum N, Berger-Bächi B, Senn MM. Regulation of antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Med Microbiol. 2010;300(2–3):118–29.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bagdonas R, Tamelis A, Rimdeika R. Staphylococcus aureus infection in the surgery of burns. Medicina. 2003;39(11):1078–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lewis K. Riddle of biofilm resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45(4):999–1007.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, Giske CG, Harbarth S, Hindler JF, Kahlmeter G, Olsson-Liljequist B, et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18(3):268–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wolfensberger A, Kuster SP, Marchesi M, Zbinden R, Hombach M. The effect of varying multidrug-resistence (MDR) definitions on rates of MDR gram-negative rods. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019;8:193.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rauber JM, Carneiro M, Arnhold GH, Zanotto MB, Wappler PR, Baggiotto B, Valim AR, d’Azevedo PA. Multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus spp and its impact on patient outcome. Am J Infect Control. 2016;44(11):e261–3.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Costa AR, Batistão DW, Ribas RM, Sousa AM, Pereira MO, Botelho CM. Staphylococcus aureus virulence factors and disease. In: Mendez-Vilas A, editor. Microbial pathogens and strategies for combating them: science, technology and education, vol. 1. Badajoz: Formatex; 2013. p. 702–10.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Labandeira-Rey M, Couzon F, Boisset S, Brown EL, Bes M, Benito Y, Barbu EM, Vazquez V, Höök M, Etienne J. Staphylococcus aureus Panton-Valentine leukocidin causes necrotizing pneumonia. Science. 2007;315(5815):1130–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Llewelyn M, Cohen J. Superantigens: microbial agents that corrupt immunity. Lancet Infect Dis. 2002;2(3):156–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pinchuk IV, Beswick EJ, Reyes VE. Staphylococcal enterotoxins. Toxins. 2010;2(8):2177–97.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rahimi F, Katouli M, Karimi S. Biofilm production among methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from catheterized patients with urinary tract infection. Microb Pathog. 2016;98:69–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Motallebi M, Jabalameli F, Asadollahi K, Taherikalani M, Emaneini M. Spreading of genes encoding enterotoxins, haemolysins, adhesin and biofilm among methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains with staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type IIIA isolated from burn patients. Microb Pathog. 2016;97:34–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Vandecasteele S, Peetermans W, Merckx R, Rijnders B, Van Eldere J. Reliability of the ica, aap and atlE genes in the discrimination between invasive, colonizing and contaminant Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates in the diagnosis of catheter-related infections. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2003;9(2):114–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lappin-Scott HM, Bass C. Biofilm formation: attachment, growth, and detachment of microbes from surfaces. Am J Infect Control. 2001;29(4):250–1.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ziebuhr W, Heilmann C, Götz F, Meyer P, Wilms K, Straube E, Hacker J. Detection of the intercellular adhesion gene cluster (ica) and phase variation in Staphylococcus epidermidis blood culture strains and mucosal isolates. Infect Immun. 1997;65(3):890–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Arciola CR, Baldassarri L, Montanaro L. Presence of icaA and icaD genes and slime production in a collection of staphylococcal strains from catheter-associated infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39(6):2151–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bessa LJ, Fazii P, Di Giulio M, Cellini L. Bacterial isolates from infected wounds and their antibiotic susceptibility pattern: some remarks about wound infection. Int Wound J. 2015;12(1):47–52.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen X, Yang H-H, Huangfu Y-C, Wang W-K, Liu Y, Ni Y-X, Han L-Z. Molecular epidemiologic analysis of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from four burn centers. Burns. 2012;38(5):738–42.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Muluye D, Wondimeneh Y, Ferede G, Nega T, Adane K, Biadgo B, Tesfa H, Moges F. Bacterial isolates and their antibiotic susceptibility patterns among patients with pus and/or wound discharge at Gondar university hospital. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7(1):1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Torpy JM, Burke A, Glass RM. Wound infections. JAMA. 2005;294(16):2122–2122.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shittu A, Kolawole D, Oyedepo E. A study of wound infections in two health institutions in Ile-Ife. Nigeria Afr J Biomed Res. 2002. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajbr.v5i3.53994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kihla AJ-FT, Ngunde PJ, Mbianda SE, Nkwelang G, Ndip RN. Risk factors for wound infection in health care facilities in Buea, Cameroon: aerobic bacterial pathogens and antibiogram of isolates. Pan Afr Med J. 2014. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2014.18.6.2304.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Mohammed A, Seid ME, Gebrecherkos T, Tiruneh M, Moges F. Bacterial isolates and their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of wound infections among inpatients and outpatients attending the University of Gondar Referral Hospital. Northwest Ethiopia. Int J Microbiol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8953829.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Damen JG, Faruk S, Dancha C. Aerobic bacteria isolates of septic wound infections and their antibiogram in North Central Nigeria. 2015;3(3):36–40.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mama M, Abdissa A, Sewunet T. Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of bacterial isolates from wound infection and their sensitivity to alternative topical agents at Jimma University Specialized Hospital, South-West Ethiopia. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2014;13(1):1–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Stotts SN, Nigro OD, Fowler TF, Roger S, Steward GF. Virulence and antibiotic resistance gene combinations among staphylococcus aureus isolates from costal waters of Oahu, Hawaii. J Young Investig. 2005.

  32. Ahmed EF, Gad GF, Abdalla AM, Hasaneen AM, Abdelwahab SF. Prevalence of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus among Egyptian patients after surgical interventions. Surg Infect. 2014;15(4):404–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Khadri H, Alzohairy M. Prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of methicillin-resistant and coagulase-negative staphylococci in a tertiary care hospital in India. Int J Med Med Sci. 2010;2(4):116–20.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hailu D, Derbie A, Mekonnen D, Zenebe Y, Adem Y, Worku S, Biadglegne F. Drug resistance patterns of bacterial isolates from infected wounds at Bahir Dar regional Health Research Laboratory center, Northwest Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Dev. 2016;30(3):112–7.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Barker KF. Antibiotic resistance: a current perspective. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1999;48(2):109.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Speer BS, Shoemaker NB, Salyers AA. Bacterial resistance to tetracycline: mechanisms, transfer, and clinical significance. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1992;5(4):387–99.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Campbell TL, Henderson J, Heinrichs DE, Brown ED. The yjeQ gene is required for virulence of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun. 2006;74(8):4918–21.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tabandeh M, Kaboosi H, Armaki MT, Pournajaf A, Ghadikolaii FP. New update on molecular diversity of clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates in Iran: Antimicrobial resistance, adhesion and virulence factors, biofilm formation and SCCmec typing. Mol Biol Rep. 2022;49(4):3099–111.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Argudín MÁ, Mendoza MC, Vazquez F, Rodicio MR. Exotoxin gene backgrounds in bloodstream and wound Staphylococcus aureus isolates from geriatric patients attending a long-term care Spanish hospital. J Med Microbiol. 2011;60(11):1605–12.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Cavalcante FS, Saintive S, Carvalho Ferreira D, Rocha Silva AB, Guimarães LC, Braga BS, Dios Abad ED, Ribeiro M, Netto Dos Santos KR. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from infected skin lesions present several virulence genes and are associated with the CC30 in Brazilian children with atopic dermatitis. Virulence. 2021;12(1):260–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Li T, Yu X, Xie J, Xu Y, Shang Y, Liu Y, Huang X, Qin Z, Parsons C, Hu L. Carriage of virulence factors and molecular characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus isolates associated with bloodstream, and skin and soft tissue infections in children. Epidemiol Infect. 2013;141(10):2158–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. El-baz R, Rizk DE, Barwa R, Hassan R. Virulence factors profile of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from different clinical sources. J Microbiol. 2016;43:126–44.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Mirzaee M, Najar Peerayeh S, Ghasemian A-M. Detection of icaABCD genes and biofilm formation in clinical isolates of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Iran J Pathol. 2014;9(4):257–62.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Chen X, Wu Z, Zhou Y, Zhu J, Li K, Shao H, Wei L. Molecular and virulence characteristics of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in burn patients. Front Lab Med. 2017;1(1):43–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Eftekhar F, Rezaee R, Azad M, Azimi H, Goudarzi H, Goudarzi M. Distribution of adhesion and toxin genes in staphylococcus aureus strains recovered from hospitalized patients admitted to the ICU. Arch Pediatr Infect Dis. 2017;5(1): e39349.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Sedaghat H, Narimani T, Esfahani BN, Mobasherizadeh S, Havaei SA. Comparison of the prevalence of microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMMs) among Staphylococcus aureus isolates in a burn unit with non-burning units. Iran J Public Health. 2021;50(1):146.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Sabouni F, Mahmoudi S, Bahador A, Pourakbari B, Sadeghi RH, Ashtiani MTH, Nikmanesh B, Mamishi S. Virulence factors of Staphylococcus aureus isolates in an Iranian referral children’s hospital. Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2014;5(2):96–100.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Li X, Fang F, Zhao J, Lou N, Li C, Huang T, Li Y. Molecular characteristics and virulence gene profiles of Staphylococcus aureus causing bloodstream infection. Braz J Infect Dis. 2018;22:487–94.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Johnson WM, Tyler S, Ewan E, Ashton F, Pollard D, Rozee K. Detection of genes for enterotoxins, exfoliative toxins, and toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 in Staphylococcus aureus by the polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29(3):426–30.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Peacock SJ, Moore CE, Justice A, Kantzanou M, Story L, Mackie K, O’Neill G, Day NP. Virulent combinations of adhesin and toxin genes in natural populations of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun. 2002;70(9):4987–96.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Nashev D, Toshkova K, Salasia SIO, Hassan AA, Lämmler C, Zschöck M. Distribution of virulence genes of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from stable nasal carriers. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2004;233(1):45–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the staff of the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department for collecting the specimens used in this study and to Associate Professor Ahmad Abdel Hamid Elheeny, Pediatric and Community Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Minia University for making the statistical analysis of this study.

Funding

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB). The research is self-funded with no external financial sources.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Microbiology and Immunology Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Deraya University, Minia, Egypt

    Asia Helmi Rasmi

  2. Microbiology and Immunology Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt

    Eman Farouk Ahmed

  3. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Minia University, Minia, Egypt

    Abdou Mohammed Abdullah Darwish

  4. Microbiology and Immunology Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Minia University, Minia, Egypt

    Gamal Fadl Mahmoud Gad

Authors
  1. Asia Helmi Rasmi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eman Farouk Ahmed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Abdou Mohammed Abdullah Darwish
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gamal Fadl Mahmoud Gad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HAR was responsible for the study concept and design, data analysis, and interpretation and the drafting, critical revision, and final approval of the manuscript and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work, ensuring integrity and accuracy. AEF, DAM, and GGF were responsible for the study concept and design, data acquisition, and the drafting, critical revision, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work, ensuring integrity and accuracy. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eman Farouk Ahmed.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study purpose and the procedures of taking the samples, clinical steps, and expected benefits were inclusively explained to the patients who signed the required informed consent to use the samples in the study. Before obtaining the samples, written informed consent was signed by each patient and/or caregiver. Ethical standards were granted by the Ethical Committee of Minia University Hospital. Ethics approval and consent to participate in all procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

: Figure S1. Detection of amplification product of hla gene by PCR; lane 1: negative control, lane 2: positive control and lanes 3 to 10: positive PCR products (209bp). Figure S2. Detection of amplification product of sea gene by PCR; lane 1: positive control, lane 2: negative control and lanes 3 to 11: positive PCR products (120bp). Figure S3. Detection of amplification product of icaA gene by PCR; lane 1: positive control, lane 2: negative control and lanes 3 to 10: positive PCR products (770bp). Figure S4. Detection of amplification product of fnbA gene by PCR; lanes 1 to 7: positive PCR products (1279bp), lane 8: positive control and lane 9: negative control

Additional file 2: Table S1.

Biochemical tests results of wound infection isolates.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rasmi, A.H., Ahmed, E.F., Darwish, A.M.A. et al. Virulence genes distributed among Staphylococcus aureus causing wound infections and their correlation to antibiotic resistance. BMC Infect Dis 22, 652 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07624-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07624-8

Keywords

  • S. aureus
  • Wound infections
  • Virulence genes
  • Antibiotic resistance

BMC Infectious Diseases

ISSN: 1471-2334

Contact us