Skip to main content
Download PDF

Factors affecting perforation of the esophagus in patients with deep neck infection

BMC Infectious Diseases volume 22, Article number: 501 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Deep neck infection (DNI) is a serious disease that can lead to severe morbidity, including esophageal perforation, and mortality. However, no previous study has explored the risk factors associated with esophageal perforation in patients with DNI. This study investigated these factors.

Methods

Between September 2015 and September 2021, 521 patients with DNI were studied. Relevant clinical variables and deep neck spaces were assessed.

Results

In a multivariate analysis, involvement of the retropharyngeal space (OR 5.449, 95% CI 1.603–18.51, p = 0.006) and the presence of mediastinitis (OR 218.8, 95% CI 55.98–855.3, p < 0.001) were independent risk factors associated with esophageal perforation in patients with DNI.

There were no differences in pathogens between 32 patients with and 489 patients without esophageal perforation (all p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Involvement of the retropharyngeal space and the presence of mediastinitis were independent risk factors associated with esophageal perforation in patients with DNI. There were no differences in pathogens between the groups with and without esophageal perforation in DNI.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Deep neck infection (DNI) is a severe bacterial infection in the potential spaces of the neck [1]. DNI can lead to airway obstruction and causes severe morbidity, including esophageal perforation, sepsis, descending necrotizing mediastinitis, necrotizing fasciitis, disseminated intravascular coagulation, carotid artery erosion, jugular vein thrombosis, pericarditis, and pleural empyema [2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. The mortality rate is 40–50% if such complications occur [9].

Esophageal perforation is a potentially life-threatening condition. Timely surgical incision and drainage of an abscess, esophageal repair, adequate intravenous antibiotic therapy, and enteral or parenteral nutrition are critical for an improved prognosis [10, 11]. Previous research has studied DNI from esophageal perforation caused by a foreign body [12,13,14].

However, no studies have explored the risk factors associated with esophageal perforation in patients with DNI. This research investigated these risk factors.

Materials and methods

This study retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 521 patients diagnosed with DNI who were admitted to Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Linkou, Taiwan, between September 2015 and September 2021. Diagnostic imaging procedures included ultrasonography (US) and computed tomography (CT). Treatment included antibiotics, US-guided needle drainage, and open surgical incision and drainage. The empirical antibiotics used were ceftriaxone (1 g q12h) and metronidazole (500 mg q8h), according to previous reports, to cover aerobic and anaerobic bacteria before the culture results were available [15, 16]. Enteral or parenteral nutrition feeding was given if esophageal perforation was suspected. All esophageal perforations were confirmed by a swallow study (esophagogram) with a barium swallow [17].

For the patient with small esophageal perforation and limited extra-esophageal involvement, we used conservative management including oxygen supplement, large bore intravenous access and cardiopulmonary monitoring. We kept the patient nothing per oral and a nasogastric tube placed for feeding and limit possible contamination. Broad spectrum intravenous antibiotics were be given with adequate analgesia [18].

Although there is no definite recommendation for indication of surgery [19], we consulted thoracic surgeon for surgical evaluation when esophageal perforation occurred with hemodynamic instability or serious extravasations of contrast into adjacent body cavities.

Basically, we judged whether esophageal perforation caused mediastinitis or mediastinitis resulted in esophageal perforation based on the time of medical history, the flow of esophagogram contrast and CT presentation.

To investigate the risk factors associated with an esophageal perforation, we collected the following patient data: gender, age, chief complaint period, hospital-staying period, C-reactive protein (CRP) level, blood sugar, diabetes mellitus (DM) status, performance of incision and drainage surgery, results of US-guided drainage, number of spaces affected by DNI, involvement of deep neck spaces, presence of mediastinitis, and esophageal perforation.

Exclusion criteria

Patients with a history of swallowing a foreign body, severe cardiopulmonary disease, immunocompromised condition, previous head and neck tumor surgery, or previous esophageal tumor surgery were excluded. A total of 521 patients were included.

Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed using MedCalc software (ver. 18.6; Ostend, Belgium). The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test showed that the data were not normally distributed; thus, we employed the chi-square test for categorical variables, the Mann–Whitney U test to compare continuous variables, and logistic regression for the univariate and multivariate analyses. A multivariate forward stepwise selection procedure was implemented, and all variables included in the univariate analysis were entered into the final multivariate model. A p value < 0.05 was considered to reflect statistical significance.

Results

Demographic and clinical data are shown in Table 1. A total of 521 patients with DNI were included; 340 males (65.25%) and 181 females (34.75%), with a mean age of 51.82 ± 19.21 years. The mean chief complaint and hospitalization periods were 4.84 ± 4.23, and 10.02 ± 8.33 days, respectively. For the laboratory data, the mean CRP level was 147.63 ± 107.07 mg/L, and the mean blood sugar level was 145.10 ± 73.46 mg/dL. A total of 214 (41.07%) patients had DM.

Table 1 Clinicopathological characteristics of the 521 patients with deep neck infection
Full size table

For DNI treatment procedures, 249 patients (47.79%) underwent incision and drainage, and 86 (16.50%) underwent an US-guided drainage procedure.

Among these patients, 188 (36.08%) had single space involvement, 161 (30.90%) had double space involvement, and 172 (33.01%) had ≥ 3 spaces involved.

Regarding deep neck space involvement, 174 (33.39%) patients had retropharyngeal spaces involved, 310 (59.50%) had parapharyngeal spaces involved, 251 (48.17%) had submandibular spaces involved, 125 (23.99%) had masticator spaces involved, 41 (7.86%) had anterior cervical spaces involved, 88 (16.89%) had parotid spaces involved, 20 (3.83%) had perivertebral spaces involved, 36 (6.90%) had carotid spaces involved, 34 (6.52%) had visceral spaces involved, and 10 (1.91%) patients had posterior cervical spaces involved. Mediastinitis was found in 45 (8.63%) patients. Esophageal perforation was found in 32 (6.14%) patients.

In Table 2, we performed univariate analysis of variables for 521 patients with DNIs and found that a higher CRP level, multiple spaces (≥ 3 spaces), involvement of the retropharyngeal space, and the presence of mediastinitis were significantly associated with esophageal perforation (p < 0.05).

Table 2 Univariate and multivariate analysis of esophageal perforation in 521 patients with deep neck infection
Full size table

Patients with esophageal perforation had an average mean CRP level of 187.56 ± 107.89 mg/L. The CRP level for those without esophageal perforation was 145.01 ± 106.61 mg/L (OR 1.003, 95% CI 1.000–1.006, p = 0.031). Multiple space involvement (≥ 3 spaces) was a significant risk factor for esophageal perforation (OR 3.696, 95% CI 1.761–7.751, p < 0.001). Involvement of the retropharyngeal space was also a risk factor for esophageal perforation (OR 9.984, 95% CI 4.025–24.76, p < 0.001). The presence of mediastinitis was another significant risk factor for esophageal perforation (OR 141.3, 95% CI 48.75–409.4, p < 0.001).

In Table 2, all factors were entered into a forward stepwise multivariate logistic regression model. Involvement of the retropharyngeal space (OR 5.449, 95% CI 1.603–18.51, p = 0.006) and the presence of mediastinitis (OR 218.8, 95% CI 55.98–855.3, p < 0.001) were significant independent risk factors for esophageal perforation in patients with DNI.

Table 3 shows a comparison of pathogens between 32 patients with and 489 patients without esophageal perforation. There were no significant differences in pathogens between these two groups (all p > 0.05). In the esophageal perforation group, only two patients (6.25%) had no growth of specific pathogens.

Table 3 Comparison of pathogens between 32 patients with esophageal perforation and 489 patients without esophageal perforation in deep neck infection
Full size table

Discussion

DNI often occurs following preceding infections such as a peritonsillar abscess, pharyngitis, or odontogenic infection [20, 21]. Clinical management usually involves departmental coordination between the general ward, intensive care unit, and operating room, with a multidisciplinary approach consisting of the otolaryngologist, chest surgeon, and anesthetist [22]. Our research found that involvement of the retropharyngeal space and the presence of mediastinitis were independent risk factors associated with esophageal perforation in patients with DNI. There were no differences in pathogens between the groups with and without esophageal perforation.

In Table 1, the male predominance was also observed in previous studies [15, 23]. The average age of our patients was similar to previous studies [16].

In Table 2, compared with those who did not have esophageal perforation, the patients with esophageal perforation had a higher average mean CRP level, which achieved statistical significance on univariate analysis (p < 0.031).

CRP is an acute inflammatory protein released during infectious processes. Wang et al. reported that patients with DNI and a CRP level > 100 mg/L have longer hospital stays [24].

However, CRP did not reach statistical significance in our multivariate analysis. Our univariate analysis results indicated that DNI involving multiple spaces (≥ 3 spaces) is a risk factor for esophageal perforation. In one study, the infection was lethal when DNI involved multiple spaces [1]. Furthermore, involvement of multiple deep neck spaces was a risk factor for patients to undergo tracheostomy [9]. However, multiple spaces (≥ 3 spaces) was not an independent risk factor in our multivariate analysis.

We considered higher levels of CRP and involvement of multiple spaces were representative of more severe infection, but they did not necessarily mean that DNI would lead to esophageal involvement or esophageal perforation. If a severe abscess did not occur at a critical site and invade the esophagus, esophageal perforation almost never happened, even with a high CRP level or involvement of multiple spaces.

The deep neck spaces lie within a complex framework formed by the cervical fascial planes [25]. The retropharyngeal space is a potential space of the head and neck just behind the esophagus, bound by the buccopharyngeal fascia anteriorly and the alar fascia posteriorly. Serious infections of the teeth can spread down this space into the posterior mediastinum [26]. Our research found that the retropharyngeal space is an independent risk factor for esophageal perforation in DNI. With retropharyngeal space involvement, the esophagus may become distorted and compressed, which can further lead to perforation (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The axial CT view of a patient with a deep neck infection and esophageal perforation. R retropharyngeal space; P parapharyngeal space; S submandibular space; air dissection (arrowhead)

Full size image

In our study, 8.63% of patients developed mediastinitis (Table 1). The presence of mediastinitis was a significant risk factor in both univariate and multivariate analyses for esophageal perforation (Table 2). Previous reports also showed that esophageal perforation and mediastinitis usually occurred together [27, 28]. When the mediastinum is severely infected with micro-abscesses and gas formation (Fig. 2), the esophagus is invaded and perforation or rupture becomes possible. The mortality rate of an infective mediastinal extension can reach around 40% [29]. From our research, the location (retropharyngeal space and mediastinum) is the most significant element for esophageal perforation in DNI. It confirms that the key infection site is highly associated with relevant complication.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Severe mediastinitis in a patient with esophageal perforation. Esophagus (arrowhead); air dissection (arrow); sternal notch (asterisk)

Full size image

Prompt clinical suspicion and appropriate imaging are important for the management of esophageal perforation. In this cohort, the esophageal perforation rate was 6.14%. A swallow study provides a radiological evaluation of the esophagus and can diagnose structural diseases and motility disorders of the esophagus [30]. The swallow study remains the gold standard study for esophageal perforation [31], and the leakage of contrast can confirm the diagnosis (Fig. 3) [11]. In addition to a swallow study, esophageal perforation can be evaluated by a CT scan [32]. Surgical repair remains an important option for many patients, but a non-operative approach, with or without the use of an endoscopic stent should be considered when the clinical situation allows for a less invasive procedure [11]. The primary treatment for esophageal perforation with DNI includes nothing by mouth, effective broad-spectrum antibiotics against the causative organisms, and enteral or parenteral nutrition. The most common cause of mortality due to esophageal perforation is multiorgan failure resulting from sepsis [33]. A repeat swallow study is necessary. If the exam shows resolution or improvement of the perforation, oral intake can be initiated [32].

Fig. 3
figure 3

A–B Contrast leakage from the site of esophageal perforation in a patient with deep neck infection on a swallow study (esophagogram). Contrast (arrowhead); flow direction (arrow line)

Full size image

In Table 3, there was no statistical difference in pathogens between 32 patients with and 489 patients without esophageal perforation in DNI. DNIs have various clinical presentations depending on the pathogenic organism [34]. Streptococcus constellatus was the most frequently cultivated pathogen in patients, regardless of whether there was an esophageal perforation (31.25%) or not (21.88%). This organism, which belongs to the Streptococcus milleri group, is commonly found on the mucous membranes of the oral cavity and oropharynx. Although it behaves as a commensal organism, it can become invasive and pathogenic after mucosal disruption, cause infection and abscesses, and lead to a locally aggressive extension to surrounding tissues such as the deep neck spaces [34,35,36].

Limitations of the article

There were some limitations to our study. The retrospective design of this study gave rise to a certain attrition rate. The majority of the study population was male, which could be a selection bias, but this is common in retrospective studies.

Conclusion

Involvement of the retropharyngeal space and the presence of mediastinitis were independent risk factors associated with esophageal perforation in patients with DNI. There were no differences in pathogens between the groups with and without esophageal perforation in DNI.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article. The data are available on request. The English in this document has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English. For a certificate, please see: http://www.textcheck.com/certificate/4HGgVV.

Abbreviations

DNI:

Deep neck infection

US:

Ultrasonography

CT:

Computed tomography

CRP:

C-reactive protein

DM:

Diabetes mellitus

OR:

Odds ratio

References

  1. Velhonoja J, Laaveri M, Soukka T, Irjala H, Kinnunen I. Deep neck space infections: an upward trend and changing characteristics. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;277(3):863–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tapiovaara L, Back L, Aro K. Comparison of intubation and tracheotomy in patients with deep neck infection. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;274(10):3767–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rzepakowska A, Rytel A, Krawczyk P, Osuch-Wojcikiewicz E, Widlak I, Deja M, Niemczyk K. The factors contributing to efficiency in surgical management of purulent infections of deep neck spaces. Ear Nose Throat J. 2021;100(5):354–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boscolo-Rizzo P, Marchiori C, Montolli F, Vaglia A, Da Mosto MC. Deep neck infections: a constant challenge. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2006;68(5):259–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Prado-Calleros HM, Jimenez-Fuentes E, Jimenez-Escobar I. Descending necrotizing mediastinitis: systematic review on its treatment in the last 6 years, 75 years after its description. Head Neck. 2016;38(Suppl 1):E2275-2283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Aizawa N, Tsuchiya A, Takahashi S. Two cases of deep neck infection with esophageal perforation. J-STAGE. 2013;26(2):149–54.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ho CY, Chin SC, Wang YC, Chen SL. Factors affecting patients with concurrent deep neck infection and aspiration pneumonia. Am J Otolaryngol. 2022;43(3): 103463.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen SL, Chin SC, Wang YC, Ho CY. factors affecting patients with concurrent deep neck infection and Lemierre’s syndrome. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12(4):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chen SL, Young CK, Tsai TY, Chien HT, Kang CJ, Liao CT, Huang SF. Factors affecting the necessity of tracheostomy in patients with deep neck infection. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021;11(9):1536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang LF, Tai CF, Kuo WR, Chien CY. Predisposing factors of complicated deep neck infections: 12-year experience at a single institution. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;39(4):335–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Soreide JA, Viste A. Esophageal perforation: diagnostic work-up and clinical decision-making in the first 24 hours. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011;19:66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lam HC, Woo JK, van Hasselt CA. Esophageal perforation and neck abscess from ingested foreign bodies: treatment and outcomes. Ear Nose Throat J. 2003;82(10):786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Li WX, Dong Y, Zhang A, Tian J, Lu C, Quraishi MS, Liu L. Management of deep neck infections from cervical esophageal perforation caused by foreign body: a case series study. Am J Otolaryngol. 2021;42(2): 102870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang LT, Lee SC, Tzao C, Chang H, Cheng YL. Successful treatment for a delay-diagnosed esophageal perforation with deep neck infection, mediastinitis, empyema, and sepsis. South Med J. 2007;100(7):727–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang SW, Lee MH, See LC, Huang SH, Chen TM, Chen TA. Deep neck abscess: an analysis of microbial etiology and the effectiveness of antibiotics. Infect Drug Resist. 2008;1:1–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen MK, Wen YS, Chang CC, Lee HS, Huang MT, Hsiao HC. Deep neck infections in diabetic patients. Am J Otolaryngol. 2000;21(3):169–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Neyaz Z, Gupta M, Ghoshal UC. How to perform and interpret timed barium esophagogram. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013;19(2):251–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Romero RV, Goh K-L. Esophageal perforation: Continuing challenge to treatment. Gastrointest Interv. 2013;2(1):1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kaman L, Iqbal J, Kundil B, Kochhar R. Management of esophageal perforation in adults. Gastroenterol Res. 2010;3(6):235–44.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gujrathi AB, Ambulgekar V, Kathait P. Deep neck space infection—a retrospective study of 270 cases at tertiary care center. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;2(4):208–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kinzer S, Pfeiffer J, Becker S, Ridder GJ. Severe deep neck space infections and mediastinitis of odontogenic origin: clinical relevance and implications for diagnosis and treatment. Acta Otolaryngol. 2009;129(1):62–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ho CY, Wang YC, Chin SC, Chen SL. Factors creating a need for repeated drainage of deep neck infections. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12(4):940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Huang TT, Liu TC, Chen PR, Tseng FY, Yeh TH, Chen YS. Deep neck infection: analysis of 185 cases. Head Neck. 2004;26(10):854–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang LF, Kuo WR, Tsai SM, Huang KJ. Characterizations of life-threatening deep cervical space infections: a review of one hundred ninety-six cases. Am J Otolaryngol. 2003;24(2):111–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Vieira F, Allen SM, Stocks RM, Thompson JW. Deep neck infection. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2008;41(3):459–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chong VF, Fan YF. Radiology of the retropharyngeal space. Clin Radiol. 2000;55(10):740–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen TC, Wu MH, Cheng YJ, Chang PC. Spontaneous pharyngoesophageal perforations. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;40(5):1250–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lin CY, Peng CC, Chiu NC, Wang NL, Lee KS. Esophageal perforation, mediastinitis, and retropharyngeal abscess after eel intrusion. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009;28(5):451–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Estrera AS, Landay MJ, Grisham JM, Sinn DP, Platt MR. Descending necrotizing mediastinitis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1983;157(6):545–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Levine MS, Rubesin SE. Diseases of the esophagus: diagnosis with esophagography. Radiology. 2005;237(2):414–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pulst-Korenberg A, Morris SC. Descending necrotizing mediastinitis resulting from pharyngitis with perforation of the aryepiglottic fold. Case Rep Emerg Med. 2020;2020:4963493.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Minnich DJ, Patrick Yu, Bryant AS, Jarrar D. Management of thoracic esophageal perforations. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;40:931–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Reeder LB, DeFilippi VJ, Ferguson MK. Current results of therapy for esophageal perforation. Am J Surg. 1995;169(6):615–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Han JK, Kerschner JE. Streptococcus milleri: an organism for head and neck infections and abscess. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127(6):650–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Gossling J. Occurrence and pathogenicity of the Streptococcus milleri group. Rev Infect Dis. 1988;10(2):257–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Whiley RA, Beighton D. Emended descriptions and recognition of Streptococcus constellatus, Streptococcus intermedius, and Streptococcus anginosus as distinct species. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1991;41(1):1–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all of the members of Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, for their invaluable help

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan

    Shih-Lung Chen & Yu-Chien Wang

  2. School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan

    Shih-Lung Chen, Chia-Ying Ho, Shy-Chyi Chin & Yu-Chien Wang

  3. Division of Chinese Internal Medicine, Center for Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan

    Chia-Ying Ho

  4. Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan

    Shy-Chyi Chin

  5. Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, New Taipei Municipal TuCheng Hospital (Built and Operated By Chang Gung Medical Foundation), New Taipei, Taiwan

    Yu-Chien Wang

Authors
  1. Shih-Lung Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chia-Ying Ho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shy-Chyi Chin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yu-Chien Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S-LC: Conceptualization, methodology, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing. C-YH: Conceptualization, writing—original draft preparation, supervision. Y-CW: Methodology, supervision. S-CC: Data curation, supervision. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shih-Lung Chen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Chang Gung Medical Foundation (IRB no. 202101833B0). The data were collected retrospectively, and the patients were anonymized before data analysis. The IRB of the Chang Gung Medical Foundation approved the waiver of the participants’ consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. A statement to confirm that all methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, SL., Ho, CY., Chin, SC. et al. Factors affecting perforation of the esophagus in patients with deep neck infection. BMC Infect Dis 22, 501 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07480-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07480-6

Keywords

BMC Infectious Diseases

ISSN: 1471-2334

Contact us