Skip to main content
Download PDF

Performance of rapid rk39 tests for the diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMC Infectious Diseases volume 21, Article number: 1166 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Visceral Leishmaniasis (VL) is a severely neglected disease affecting millions of people with high mortality if left untreated. In Ethiopia, the primary laboratory diagnosis of VL is by using an antigen from a 39-amino acid sequence repeat of a kinesin-related (rK39) of leishmania donovani complex (L. donovani), rapid diagnostic tests (RDT). Different rk39 RDT brands are available with very variable performance and studies from Ethiopia showed a very wide range of sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to determine the pooled sensitivity and specificity of rk39 RDT in Ethiopia.

Method

PUBMED, EMBASE, and other sources were searched using predefined search terms to retrieve all relevant articles from 2007 to 2020. Heterogeneity was assessed by visually inspecting summary receiver operating curves (SROC), Spearman correlation coefficient (rs), Cochran Q test statistics, inconsistency square (I2) and subgroup analysis. The presence and statistical significance of publication bias were assessed by Egger's test at p < 0.05, and all the measurements showed the presence of considerable heterogeneity. Quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2) checklists was used to check the qualities of the study.

Results

A total of 664 articles were retrieved, and of this 12 articles were included in the meta-analysis. Overall pooled sensitivity and specificity of the rk39 RDT to diagnose VL in Ethiopia were 88.0% (95% CI 86.0% to 89.0%) and 84.0% (95% CI 82.0% to 86.0%), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the rk39 RDT commercial test kits were DiaMed: 86.9% (95% CI 84.3% to 89.1%) and 82.2% (95% CI 79.3% to 85.0%), and InBios: 80.0% (95% CI 77.0% to 82.8%) and 97.4% (95% CI 95.0% to 98.8%), respectively.

Conclusion

Referring to our result, rk39 RDT considered an essential rapid diagnostic test for VL diagnosis. Besides to the diagnostic accuracy, the features such as easy to perform, quick (10–20 min), cheap, equipment-free, electric and cold chain free, and result reproducibility, rk39 RDT is advisable to remains in practice as a diagnostic test at least in the remote VL endemic localities till a better test will come.

Peer Review reports

Background

Visceral leishmaniasis (VL), or kala-azar, is a neglected tropical parasitic disease caused by a group of intracellular hemoflagellate protozoans of the genus Leishmania and transmitted via the bite of infected female Phlebotomine sandflies [1, 2]. Over 90% of the global VL burden is attributed to six less developed countries: Bangladesh, Brazil, India, Ethiopia, Sudan, and South Sudan [3,4,5]. Ethiopia ranks third among the world's most VL-affected countries and around 3.2 million people in the country are at risk of contracting the disease [6, 7]. The northern and northwest parts of the country have the highest burden, (Fig. 1), which accounts for nearly 30–40% of the total number of Ethiopian VL patients [8]. It is estimated that about 30% of the VL patients are also malnourished and co-infected with HIV, especially in the northern region of Ethiopia [9].

Fig. 1
figure 1

A map showing the north and northwest, and remaining other areas of Ethiopia

Full size image

As VL is a deadly disease, timely and accurate diagnosis is important to install appropriate treatment [5]. The diagnosis is based on the combination of clinical signs and symptoms with laboratory confirmation [10]. The laboratory confirmation is done by demonstrating Leishmania parasites in microscopic preparations from splenic, or bone marrow, or lymph node aspirates, which is considered to be the gold standard test [11]. However, the low sensitivity combined with the invasive and risky sample collection procedures deterred the implementation of microscopy in the remote endemic areas of Ethiopia [12]. To circumvent the drawbacks of direct parasitological methods, serology has now been put in place in many regions of the country for the diagnosis of VL [13]. The direct agglutination test (DAT) is a pioneer serological test based on the agglutination of a Leishmania promastigote antigen preparation with specific antibodies in patient serum, which result can be interpreted without any reading aid. The DAT is robust, as the freeze-dried antigen with proven high sensitivity and specificity in all VL endemic regions around the world at an affordable price [14]. The drawback of DAT is relatively long overnight incubation and RDTs have been proposed as alternatives. In particular, Rk39 RDT detects antibodies against the 39-amino acid repeat antigens encoded by a kinesin-related gene of the amastigotes stage of the Leishmania infantum [15, 16], is considered to be a good alternative. The rK39 RDTs are simple to perform, cost-effective, stable at room temperature, and rapid. These immunochromatographic tests are currently widely implemented for the diagnosis of VL in resource-limited countries like Ethiopia [17, 18]. However, limitations of rk39 RDTs are variable specificity, inability to differentiate between current and past infection, not being suitable for treatment effectiveness monitoring [19].

Studies performed in Ethiopia, which evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of rk39 RDT, showed a large variation with sensitivities, ranging from 27.8% [20] to 98.3% [21]. Similarly, the specificities also showed a huge variation from 27.8% [20] to 98.2% [22]. Despite these variations, Ethiopia does not have nationwide and regional data that showed the diagnostic accuracy of the rk39 test. Therefore, this review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the pooled national sensitivity and specificity of the rk39 test and to assess if there is a difference between the different regions of the country.

Method and materials

Study design

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed following the Cochran library recommendations for determining diagnostic test accuracy to assess the nationwide pooled sensitivity and specificity of the rk39 RDTs produced by InBios International Inc. (Seattle, WA, USA) or DiaMed-IT Leish®, DiaMed AG, Cressiersur-Morat, Switzerland, DiaMed Bio-RAD France, and Kalazar Detect® (InBios International, USA, and onsite Leishmania Ab Rapid Test (CTK Biotech, USA).

Inclusion criteria

Original articles that determined the diagnostic accuracy of the index tests (rk39 RDT) for diagnosis of VL using human specimen, have a reference/s test, presence of the actual number of true positive, true negative, false-positive, and false-negative, and has a clear classification of study subjects into VL patients and controls were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis.

Exclusion criteria

Articles were excluded if not clearly define the reference test and patient and control groups. Studies that used non-human specimens were also excluded.

Search strategy

Electronic search in MEDLINE (via PUBMED), EMBASE, and Google Scholar was performed to retrieve articles evaluating the diagnostic performance of rk39 RDT for VL published from 2004 to 2020. To include more articles, we performed searching in other databases such as web of Science and SCOPUS using searching terms like evaluation, performance, validation, sensitivity, and specificity of rk39, Visceral Leishmania, VL, kala-azar, L. donovani, L. infantum, and Ethiopia. Duplicates cleaning was performed by using EndNote X8 software. Primarily selection was done by reading titles and abstracts. Subsequently, articles found eligible by initial selection were further screened by reading the full text. The initial screening was independently performed by Dawit G. Hagos and Dr. Dawit Wolday. Discrepancies were resolved by discussion among the members of the team. To retrieve the relevant articles, the following search terms were included: PUBMED:- ((((((("leishmaniasis visceral"[MeSH Terms] OR "Kala-azar"[tiab]) AND "L. infantum"[tiab]) OR "L. donovani"[tiab]) OR "L. chagasi"[tiab]) AND (("diagnostic performance"[tiab] OR "rk39"[tiab]) OR "validation"[tiab])) AND "Ethiopia"[tiab]. The search terms for EMBASE were: (('visceral leishmaniasis'/exp OR 'kala azar'/exp OR 'l. donovani' OR 'l. infantum') AND 'performance of rk39' OR 'evaluation of rk39' OR 'evaluation'/exp) AND Ethiopia. Furthermore, to search for unpublished manuscripts, institutions specific libraries such as Ethiopian University websites were searched. On top of this, references of the included articles were checked for cross-reference. Neither language nor time restriction was applied.

Data analysis

Data were first extracted into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratio were calculated using Meta-DiSc software, developed by Clinical Biostatistics Unit—Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Hospital University of Madrid, Spain and results were presented into a summary table and forest plot. Besides, the summary of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plot was also generated, using sensitivity on the Y-axis and 1-specificity on the X-axis, which classifies the patient into VL and non-VL [23]. Heterogeneity was assessed by Inconsistent square (I2), visually inspecting SROC curves, subgroup analysis, and Spearman correlation coefficient (rs), where rs > 0.6 indicates the presence of heterogeneity [24]. Inconsistency square (I2) statistics, categorised heterogeneity in to low (I2 < 25%), moderate (I2 = 25–75%) and high (I2 > 75%) [25]. Cochran Q test statistics (Chi-square) was also performed to explore the presence of heterogeneity. When the chi-square statistics p-value is < 0.05, then the heterogeneity present is significant [26]. Publication bias was ascertained by performing Egger’s test p-value and publication bias p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. The quality of the selected articles was evaluated using QUADAS-2 checklists [27, 28].

Results

Using the search terms, 340, 322, and 2 articles from PUBMED, EMBASE, and Google scholar online databases respectively were retrieved. Besides, the references of all the included articles were checked for cross-referencing and obtained null. Moreover, other databases such as web of Science, SciELO and SCOPUS were also searched but no additional eligible articles were retrieved. No eligible gray or unpublished articles were obtained by personal communications and by searching specific Ethiopian University libraries. After duplicates were removed using the EndNote X8 reference manager, an initial selection process was performed by reading titles and abstracts and end up with 77 articles. Further screening was also done by reading the full-text length and finally, 12 articles were included in the meta-analysis (Fig. 2). From the 12 articles, 2240 data were extracted and included in the final random-effects models of meta-analysis.

Fig. 2
figure 2

PRISMA Workflow Diagram for the article’s selection process

Full size image

The systematic review showed a sensitivity of the rk39 RDT for VL diagnosis in Ethiopia ranged from 27.8% [9] to 98.3% [21]. Similarly, specificity was varied from 27.8% [20] to 98.5% [17], (Table 1). The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the included articles were also computed and the overall pooled sensitivity and specificity of the rk39 RDTs for VL diagnosis in the Ethiopian studies were 88.0% (95% CI 86.0% to 89.0%) and 84.0% (95% CI 82.0% to 86.0%), respectively, (Fig. 3).

Table 1 Compiled eligible studies included in the meta-analysis of rk39 in Ethiopia
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

Estimates of sensitivity and specificity of rK39-based RDTs for the serodiagnosis of VL in Ethiopian studies

Full size image

A large deviation of sensitivity and specificity among the individual studies and from pooled was observed. To explore the presence of heterogeneity, different methods such as I2, Chi-square, rs, visual inspection of SROC, and subgroup analysis were employed. The I2 statistics demonstrated considerable heterogeneity: sensitivities (I2 = 83.4) and specificity (I2 = 90.4%). The Chi-square p-value was very low (P = 0.0000) and hence the heterogeneity present was significant, not by chance [26].

In addition, rs was computed between sensitivity (logit of the true positive rate) and specificity (logit of the false positive rate) for rk39 RDT [24]. In our analysis, rs = 0.699, P = 0.043, suggesting a significant threshold effect, which in turn explained there was a significant heterogeneity [29].

By performing the subgroup analysis, between study heterogeneity was determined, and only these using different reference test was found a cause for heterogeneity (I2 reduced from 92.1 to 77.6). Neither the different Ethiopian regions nor type of commercial kits were the found the cause for heterogeneity. The sensitivity and specificity of the rk39 in north Ethiopia, a region with highest VL prevalence, were found lower: 86.0% (95% CI 84.0% to 88.0%) and 71.0% (95% CI 75.0% to 92.0%) than the rest: 100.0% (95% CI 72.0% to 100.0%) and 87.0% (95% CI 83.0% to 90.0%), respectively. Furthermore, these studies that used InBios International Inc. kit had higher sensitivities and specificities (89.2%, 95% CI 86.7% to 91.4%, I2 = 84.3% and 88.6%, 95% CI 84.9% to 91.6%, I2 = 87.7%) than DiaMed-IT(86.7%, 95% CI 84.2% to 89.0%, I2 = 83.5% and 82.1%, 95% CI 79.1% to 84.8%, I2 = 92.7) respectively. The rk39 RDT that uses microscopy and/or NNN culture as reference test had lower sensitivity and specificity (84.4%, 95% CI 81.4% to 87.1%, I2 = 85.6% and 74.1%, 95% CI 69.5% to 78.3%, I2 = 92.1%) than those used serology (90.7%, 95% CI 88.5% to 92.6%, I2 = 77.6% and 90.2%, 95% CI 87.7% to 92.3%, I2 = 78.2%). The likelihood ratio of the rk39 was also determined. The overall positive likelihood ratio (LR) were 5.12 (95% CI 2.93% to 8.94%), (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Estimates of positive likelihood ratio of rK39 for the diagnosis of VL in Ethiopian studies

Full size image

Similarly, the negative likelihood ratio was also determined: 0.17 (95% CI 0.09% to 0.92%, (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Estimates of negative likelihood ratio of rK39 for the diagnosis of VL in Ethiopian studies

Full size image

Performance of rk39 among HIV seropositive individuals

In this meta-analysis, the sensitivity and specificity of rk39 among the HIV-positive and negative participants were determined. In HIV negatives, the sensitivity and specificity of the rk39 were 86.0% (95% CI 81.0% to 91.0%) and 97.0% (95% CI 94.0% to 99.0%) respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of rk39 among HIV positive VL patients were 82.0% (95% CI 76.0% to 87.0%) and 67.0% (22.0% to 96%) respectively.

The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) is an important single indicator that explained the diagnostic capability of a test to correctly differentiate patients from the non-patients. The DOR was: 37.94 (95% CI 14.28 to 100.81), Fig. 6. However, when the two extreme outliers, Kiros et al. [20] and Endalamaw et al. [9], were excluded, the DOR is raised to 49.59 (17.79 to 136.26).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Diagnostic Odds Ratio of rk39 to diagnose VL in Ethiopia

Full size image

The SROC curve analysis is one of the valuable parameters to classify an individual into disease and without the disease [30]. In this meta-analysis, the SROC curve was generated and the area under the curve (AUC) was 93.4, Fig. 7. As part of heterogeneity testing in the SROC curve, we visually inspect the curve for the presence of shoulder arm pattern at the upper left corner and the pattern was observed which representing the existence of heterogeneity. According to Cochran's handbook guide for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy, the currently available methods such as funnel plot are not appropriate to examine the presence of publication bias [31]. Therefore, we only determined Egger’s test P-value to examine whether there is a significant publication bias or not. In our analysis, Egger’s test yielded P = 0.014, referring publication bias was statistically significant.

Fig. 7
figure 7

summary ROC of rk39 for the diagnosis of VL in Ethiopia

Full size image

Discussion

In this systematic review, we observed a very wide range of sensitivities and specificities of rk39 RDT among each study (27.8% to 98.3% and 27.8% to 98.5%) and from the pooled estimates (88.0% and 84.0%) respectively. The pooled sensitivity of the rk39 RDT was lower (88.0%) compared to the Indian sub-continent (97%) and the global sensitivity (91.9%) [32], and a little higher than the pooled sensitivity of the east African studies (85.3%). The variation possibly is explained by the commercial brand of rk39 RDT and the reference test used. More importantly, the sensitivity of the kit in the northern part of Ethiopia, a region with the highest VL burden, is lower (86.0%) compared to the other parts of Ethiopia (100.0%). The principle of the rk39 RDT is based on the detection of anti-leishmania antibodies in the patient’s serum, which persists for months and even for years after a patient recovered from the disease. In addition, anti-leishmania antibodies can be produced in asymptomatic and sub-clinical patients as well [22], which potentially reduced the diagnostic accuracy in endemic areas. The commercial brand of rk39 RDT, types of reference tests, and the presence of other comorbidities like HIV can lower the performance. Genetic diversity of rK39 gene sequences of L. donovani strains between East African and Indian or maybe due to population differences between the continents can be the cause for the performance disparities. Molecular characterization of the rK39 kinesin repeat sequences of L. donovani strains from East Africa demonstrated a clear divergence from the Southeast Asian strains, manifested by a variation in drug susceptibility patterns: Indian strains were sensitive to a certain drug whereas East Africa strains were resistant [22].

More interestingly, the northern and north-western strains are similar to the Sudanese strains whereas the southern strains are similar to the Kenyan strain [33,34,35], which perhaps, revealed the reason for performance disparities within Ethiopia. The major challenge of meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy in dealing with heterogeneity. In the present study, a considerable level of heterogeneity (I2 > 75) was determined. To assess the source of heterogeneity, subgroup analysis using a different type of reference test and commercial brand of rk39 was performed based. Accordingly, using different types of reference tests was found as source heterogeneity while variation in commercial Brand of rk39 RDT was not. Publication bias is one of the essential parameters to be determined during meta-analysis, especially in interventional studies. However, these methods are not appropriate for meta-analysis of diagnostic tests [31]. As a result, we only determined the Egger’s test p-values and observed a significant publication bias, p = 0.014.

To include gray literature and unpublished manuscripts, searching specific Ethiopian University libraries and personal communications with individuals working at various research institutions in Ethiopia were made. Besides, we also checked the references of the included studies to increase the chance of getting more articles. We did not have any language and time restrictions, though we know studies done in Ethiopia are all in English.

The sensitivity and specificity of rk39 RDT were higher (90.7% and 90.2%) in studies that used serology than microscopy and/or NNN culture (84.4% and 74.1%) and PCR (89.8% and 50.0%) as reference tests. The possible explanation could be L. donovani complex can non-specifically activate B cells to produce cross-reactive antibodies that can affect the specificity of the test [36]. The specificity of rk39 among Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) negative was higher (97.0%) than HIV positive (66.0%) VL patients. However, the sensitivity of HIV-positive (82.0%) and negative VL (86.0%) patients almost remained similar. HIV, known to deplete T cells, induces immune tolerance and lowering the renewal of the T-cell repertoire which leads to exhaustion of B cells response [37], which justifies the rk39 RDT performance disparities observed in this analysis.

Diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), which is not affected by disease prevalence, is an important single quantitative parameter that revealed the tests' ability to classify the individuals into diseased and not diseased [38]. In the present meta-analysis, the DOR of rk39 RDT to diagnose VL was 37.9 and therefore the odds of VL patients having a positive rk39 test result is approximately 38 times higher than those individuals without the disease. The likelihood ratio is also another essential indicator for the diagnostic test to assess how likely the VL patients have a positive diagnostic result [39]. Likelihood ratios range from zero to infinity, so the higher the value, the more likely the patient to have the disease. In the present meta-analysis, the positive likelihood ratio was 5.12 and hence the positive test result occurs 5.12 times more frequently in VL patients than the non-VL patients. Similarly, the negative likelihood ratio was 0.17 and hence, rk39 RDT negative test result was 1/0.17 = 5.9 times less frequent in VL patients than the non-VL patients. Moreover, another essential indicator of the performance of a diagnostic test is the SROC curve, which categorized patients into VL and non-VL, which is expressed by the AUC. The AUC has different scales; 0.9 to 1.0 = excellent, 0.8 to 0.9 = good, 0.7 to 0.8 = fair, and < 0.5 have no diagnostic value. Therefore, in the present meta-analysis, the AUC is 0.93 and hence, according to the result, rk39 is an excellent alternative diagnostic test for VL in endemic remote areas, Fig. 5.

Limitation of the study

The major limitation of this meta-analysis was the individual studies employed diverse types of reference tests which affects the pooled sensitivity and specificity of the test. Apart from this, the rk39 RDT has certain inherent limitations as the test is based on anti-Leishmania antibodies, which can remain in the serum for a long time even after the parasite has cleared. On top of this, we did not perform meta-regression because the software did not support it.

Conclusions

Referring to our result, rk39 considered an essential rapid diagnostic test for VL diagnosis. Besides the diagnostic accuracy, the features such as easy to perform, quick (10–20 min), cheap, equipment-free, electric and cold chain free, and result reproducibility, rk39 RDT is advisable to remains in practice as a diagnostic test at least in the remote VL endemic localities of Ethiopia till a better test will come.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

References

  1. Ferede G, Diro E, Getie S, Getnet G, Takele Y, Amsalu A, et al. Visceral leishmaniasis-malaria coinfection and their associated factors in patients attending Metema Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia: suggestion for integrated vector management. Malar Res Treat. 2017;2017:6816913.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Diro E, Techane Y, Tefera T, Assefa Y, Kebede T, Genetu A, et al. Field evaluation of FD-DAT, rK39 dipstick and KATEX (urine latex agglutination) for diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis in northwest Ethiopia. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007;101(9):908–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. de Ruiter CM, van der Veer C, Leeflang MM, Deborggraeve S, Lucas C, Adams ER. Molecular tools for diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis: systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52(9):3147–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Elmahallawy EK, Martínez AS, Rodriguez-Granger J, Hoyos-Mallecot Y, Agil A, Mari JMN, et al. Diagnosis of leishmaniasis. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2014;8(8):961–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. ter Horst R, Tefera T, Assefa G, Ebrahim AZ, Davidson RN, Ritmeijer K. Field evaluation of rK39 test and direct agglutination test for diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis in a population with high prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus in Ethiopia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009;80(6):929–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Alebie G, Worku A, Yohannes S, Urga B, Hailu A, Tadesse D. Epidemiology of visceral leishmaniasis in Shebelle Zone of Somali Region, eastern Ethiopia. Parasit Vectors. 2019;12(1):209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ayelign B, Jemal M, Negash M, Genetu M, Wondmagegn T, Zeleke AJ, et al. Validation of in-house liquid direct agglutination test antigen: the potential diagnostic test in visceral Leishimaniasis endemic areas of Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Microbiol. 2020;20:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Diro E, Lynen L, Assefa M, Takele Y, Mengesha B, Adem E, et al. Impact of the use of a rapid diagnostic test for visceral leishmaniasis on clinical practice in Ethiopia: a retrospective study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(5):e0003738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gadisa E, Custodio E, Canavate C, Sordo L, Abebe Z, Nieto J, et al. Usefulness of the rK39-immunochromatographic test, direct agglutination test, and leishmanin skin test for detecting asymptomatic Leishmania infection in children in a new visceral leishmaniasis focus in Amhara State. Ethiopia Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012;86(5):792–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Akhoundi M, Downing T, Votypka J, Kuhls K, Lukes J, Cannet A, et al. Leishmania infections: molecular targets and diagnosis. Mol Aspects Med. 2017;57:1–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Srivastava P, Dayama A, Mehrotra S, Sundar S. Diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2011;105(1):1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dixit KK, Verma S, Singh OP, Singh D, Singh AP, Gupta R, et al. Validation of SYBR green I based closed tube loop mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay and simplified direct-blood-lysis (DBL)-LAMP assay for diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis (VL). PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(11):e006922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Maia Z, Lírio M, Mistro S, Mendes CMC, Mehta SR, Badaro R. Comparative study of rK39 Leishmania antigen for serodiagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis: systematic review with meta-analysis. PLoS Neglect Trop Dis. 2012;6(1):e1484.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Boelaert M, Lynen L, Desjeux P, Van Der Stuyft P. Cost-effectiveness of competing diagnostic-therapeutic strategies for visceral leishmaniasis. Bull World Health Organ. 1999;77(8):667.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Burns JM, Shreffler WG, Benson DR, Ghalib HW, Badaro R, Reed SG. Molecular characterization of a kinesin-related antigen of Leishmania chagasi that detects specific antibody in African and American visceral leishmaniasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1993;90(2):775–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Vaish M, Singh OP, Chakravarty J, Sundar S. rK39 antigen for the diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis by using human saliva. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012;86(4):598–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Canavate C, Herrero M, Nieto J, Cruz I, Chicharro C, Aparicio P, et al. Evaluation of two rK39 dipstick tests, direct agglutination test, and indirect fluorescent antibody test for diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis in a new epidemic site in highland Ethiopia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011;84(1):102–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Borzi AA, Rasouli M, Nademi Z, Kadivar M, Pourabbas B. Evaluation of rK39 strip test for the diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis in infants. EMHJ-Eastern Mediterr Health J. 2006;12(3–4):294–9.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ghasemian M, Gharavi MJ, Akhlaghi L, Mohebali M, Meamar AR, Aryan E, et al. Development and assessment of loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay for the diagnosis of human visceral leishmaniasis in Iran. Iran J Parasitol. 2014;9(1):50–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kiros YK, Regassa BF. The role of rk39 serologic test in the diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis in a Tertiary Hospital, Northern Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes. 2017;10(1):169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ejazi SA, Ghosh S, Saha S, Choudhury ST, Bhattacharyya A, Chatterjee M, et al. A multicentric evaluation of dipstick test for serodiagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis in India, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Brazil, Ethiopia and Spain. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):9932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bezuneh A, Mukhtar M, Abdoun A, Teferi T, Takele Y, Diro E, et al. Comparison of point-of-care tests for the rapid diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis in East African patients. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014;91(6):1109–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nagai K, Horita N, Yamamoto M, Tsukahara T, Nagakura H, Tashiro K, et al. Diagnostic test accuracy of loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for Mycobacterium tuberculosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:39090.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Walusimbi S, Bwanga F, De Costa A, Haile M, Joloba M, Hoffner S. Meta-analysis to compare the accuracy of GeneXpert, MODS and the WHO 2007 algorithm for diagnosis of smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13(1):1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mohebali M, Keshavarz H, Shirmohammad S, Akhoundi B, Borjian A, Hassanpour G, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of direct agglutination test for serodiagnosis of human visceral leishmaniasis: a systematic review with meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20(1):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Israel H, Richter RR. A guide to understanding meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Therapy. 2011;41(7):496–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(8):529–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Venazzi A, Swardfager W, Lam B, de Oliveira Siqueira J, Herrmann N, Cogo-Moreira H. Validity of the QUADAS-2 in assessing risk of bias in Alzheimer’s disease diagnostic accuracy studies. Front Psychiatry. 2018. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00221.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Littenberg B, Moses LE. Estimating diagnostic accuracy from multiple conflicting reports: a new meta-analytic method. Med Decis Making. 1993;13(4):313–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Narkhede S. Understanding AUC-ROC curve. Towards Data Sci. 2018;26:220.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Macaskill P, Gatsonis C, Deeks J, Harbord R, Takwoingi Y. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy. Version 0.9. 0. London: Cochrane Collaboration. 2010;83.

  32. Boelaert M, El-Safi S, Hailu A, Mukhtar M, Rijal S, Sundar S, et al. Diagnostic tests for kala-azar: a multi-centre study of the freeze-dried DAT, rK39 strip test and KAtex in East Africa and the Indian subcontinent. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2008;102(1):32–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Zackay A, Nasereddin A, Takele Y, Tadesse D, Hailu W, Hurissa Z, et al. Polymorphism in the HASPB repeat region of East African Leishmania donovani strains. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7(1):e2031.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Al-Salem W, Herricks JR, Hotez PJ. A review of visceral leishmaniasis during the conflict in South Sudan and the consequences for East African countries. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9(1):460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Leta S, Dao THT, Mesele F, Alemayehu G. Visceral leishmaniasis in Ethiopia: an evolving disease. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8(9):e3131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Galvao-Castro B, Ferreira JS, Marzochi K, Marzochi M, Coutinho S, Lambert P. Polyclonal B cell activation, circulating immune complexes and autoimmunity in human american visceral leishmaniasis. Clin Exp Immunol. 1984;56(1):58.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Lindoso JAL, Moreira CHV, Cunha MA, Queiroz IT. Visceral leishmaniasis and HIV coinfection: current perspectives. Hiv/aids (Auckland, NZ). 2018;10:193.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Glas AS, Lijmer JG, Prins MH, Bonsel GJ, Bossuyt PM. The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56(11):1129–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Geweke JF, Singleton KJ. Interpreting the likelihood ratio statistic in factor models when the sample size is small. J Am Stat Assoc. 1980;75(369):133–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledgment the funding agent (EDCTP) as this systematic review and meta-analysis was part of a bigger project.

Funding

This article was part of the project supported by the European Developing Countries Clinical Trial Partnership (EDCTP)—European Commission (Grant ID#: TMA2016SF-1437), The Hague, The Netherlands. The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Ethiopia

    Dawit Gebreegziabiher Hagos & Mahmud Abdulkadir

  2. College of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Ethiopia

    Yazezew K. Kiros

  3. College of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Ethiopia

    Dawit Wolday

  4. Academic Medical Centre at the University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Microbiology, Experimental Parasitology Unit, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Dawit Gebreegziabiher Hagos & Henk D. F. H. Schallig

Authors
  1. Dawit Gebreegziabiher Hagos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Henk D. F. H. Schallig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yazezew K. Kiros
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mahmud Abdulkadir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Dawit Wolday
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

DGH, DW, HDFHS design, and conceptualization of the study. DGH and DW performed the search, retrieved, and made the initial and secondary selection. Methodological and quality assessment and meta-analysis was of was done by DGH and DW. Manuscript writing and reviewing were done by DGH, DW, MA, YK, and HDFHS. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dawit Gebreegziabiher Hagos.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

“Not applicable”.

Consent for publication

“Not applicable”.

Competing interests

All authors declared no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hagos, D.G., Schallig, H.D.F.H., Kiros, Y.K. et al. Performance of rapid rk39 tests for the diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis 21, 1166 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06826-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06826-w

Keywords

BMC Infectious Diseases

ISSN: 1471-2334

Contact us