Skip to main content

SARS-CoV-2/DENV co-infection: a series of cases from the Federal District, Midwestern Brazil



Since the novel coronavirus disease outbreak, over 179.7 million people have been infected by SARS-CoV-2 worldwide, including the population living in dengue-endemic regions, particularly Latin America and Southeast Asia, raising concern about the impact of possible co-infections.


Thirteen SARS-CoV-2/DENV co-infection cases reported in Midwestern Brazil between April and September of 2020 are described. Information was gathered from hospital medical records regarding the most relevant clinical and laboratory findings, diagnostic process, therapeutic interventions, together with clinician-assessed outcomes and follow-up.


Of the 13 cases, seven patients presented Acute Undifferentiated Febrile Syndrome and six had pre-existing co-morbidities, such as diabetes, hypertension and hypopituitarism. Two patients were pregnant. The most common symptoms and clinical signs reported at first evaluation were myalgia, fever and dyspnea. In six cases, the initial diagnosis was dengue fever, which delayed the diagnosis of concomitant infections. The most frequently applied therapeutic interventions were antibiotics and analgesics. In total, four patients were hospitalized. None of them were transferred to the intensive care unit or died. Clinical improvement was verified in all patients after a maximum of 21 days.


The cases reported here highlight the challenges in differential diagnosis and the importance of considering concomitant infections, especially to improve clinical management and possible prevention measures. Failure to consider a SARS-CoV-2/DENV co-infection may impact both individual and community levels, especially in endemic areas.

Peer Review reports


Since the outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), over 179.7 million people have been infected by SARS-CoV-2 in over 210 countries [1]. This includes developing regions that are endemic for dengue fever, particularly Latin America and Southeast Asia, which raised concern about the effects of co-infection with dengue viruses (DENV) and SARS-CoV-2 [2,3,4,5,6].

In Brazil and other tropical countries, SARS-CoV-2 was first notified during an ongoing epidemic of dengue fever, with Midwestern Brazil presenting the highest incidence nationwide [2,3,4,5,6]. The city of Brasilia, located in the Federal District of Brazil, alone had an incidence of 1469.8 cases per 100,000 inhabitants [7]. Dengue fever cases usually reach their peak in the first semester of the year in the Federal District, greatly influenced by precipitation during summer time [8]. Due to similarities in their epidemiological and clinical profiles, co-infections of DENV with other febrile syndromes have been reported [9, 10].

In light of the current pandemic scenario, several other infections may share an array of symptoms with COVID-19. Limited data are available in the literature regarding the SARS-CoV-2/DENV co-infection, with a single case reported in an urban area of Brazil, where the patient progressed to a favorable outcome [11]. Thus, it is necessary to understand the spectrum of this co-infection for timely diagnosis and tailored clinical management, which could prove lifesaving in severe cases. Herein, we describe a series of 13 patients with a SARS-CoV-2/DENV co-infection in Brazil aiming to disclose important details of this emerging co-infection considering the diagnosis, clinical management and possible prevention measures.


This retrospective study evaluated 13 patients co-infected with SARS-CoV-2 and DENV diagnosed at the Hospital Universitário de Brasília (HUB), a university hospital located in Brasília (Federal District, Brazil), between April and September of 2020. Patients that were diagnosed with COVID-19 and dengue fever within a maximum timespan of 15 days were considered co-infected. All patients included in this study: (a) had positive RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2, and a positive NS1 or IgM ELISA for DENV with strongly suggestive dengue symptoms in a maximum timeframe of 15 days (RT-PCR for DENV was not performed for any of the patients); (b) resided in the Federal District; (c) were over 18 years old, and (d) were able to understand the information contained in the Free and Informed Consent Form.

For all patients, SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed in nasopharyngeal swab samples by the reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The High Pure Viral Nucleic Acid Version 18 Kit (Roche Diagnostics®, Germany) was used for viral RNA extraction. RT-PCR was performed on a StepOnePlus™ Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems®, USA) using the Molecular SARS-CoV-2 (E/RP) - Bio-Manguinhos kit (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DENV infection was confirmed by either NS1 or IgM, as described in Table 1. Detection of DENV NS1 antigen was performed using a rapid immunochromatographic test (ABBOTT-Alere® S.A., Brazil), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Antibodies for DENV were detected by a commercially available indirect IgM enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Euroimmun®, Germany).

Table 1 Clinical and laboratory characteristics of COVID-19/dengue cases

The cases were reported by a team of healthcare professionals in the COVID-19 and endemic diseases co-infections study approved by Brazil’s National Committee of Ethics under CAAE 34164820.6.0000.0030. All patients received clarification about the general proposal of the study both orally and in writing, based on the printed text of the Free and Informed Consent Form (FICF), which was signed by all patients included in this study. The FICF also assured patients of confidentiality regarding their names and personal data, as well as the possibility of waiving their participation at any time.

Information collected from hospital medical records included: 1) most relevant clinical and laboratory findings, such as clinical presentation (Acute Respiratory Febrile Syndrome - ARFS, or Acute Undifferentiated Febrile Syndrome - AUFS); 2) concomitant conditions; 3) need for hospitalization; 4) platelet count; 5) lymphocyte count, and finally 6) main signs and symptoms at first evaluation.

In addition, information was gathered about the diagnostic process, from the initial to the final diagnosis of a concomitant infection with SARS-CoV-2 and DENV, including: an eventual delay between first and final diagnosis; description of the therapeutic interventions, together with pharmacological, preventative and self-care measures; clinician-assessed outcomes, and follow-up. This descriptive study numbered the reported cases from 1 to 13 to ensure de-identification of patient-specific information.


Of the 13 SARS-CoV-2/DENV co-infection cases reported in this study, with ages ranging between 27 and 79, seven patients were female, and seven patients presented AUFS. Pre-existing morbidities were present in four patients, including diabetes in one patient, diabetes and hypertension in one patient, hypopituitarism and pituitary tumor in one patient, and hypopituitarism and adrenal insufficiency in another patient. Moreover, two patients were pregnant. One of the pregnant patients (Case 5) gave birth without any complications during the course of the SARS-CoV-2/DENV co-infection. Patient case number 10, also pregnant, presented gestational diabetes, chronic gastritis and depression, but experienced no pregnancy-related complications until her 10th week of pregnancy. A total of six patients presented thrombocytopenia, and only one patient had lymphopenia. The most frequently reported symptoms at first evaluation were myalgia, fever and dyspnea, followed by dry cough and diarrhea, as presented in Fig. 1. The clinical and laboratory aspects of all 13 patients are summarized in Table 1.

Fig. 1

Signs and symptoms described in hospital medical records at the first evaluation of patients with SARS-CoV-2/DENV co-infection

As displayed in Table 2, the initial diagnosis for six of the 13 patients was dengue fever, and only after a delayed period, ranging from 2 to 12 days, were these patients also diagnosed with COVID-19. Suspicion of co-infection with SARS-CoV-2 in these patients was raised mainly due to the persistence or emergence of fever or respiratory symptoms. Conversely, in one case, the patient was first diagnosed with COVID-19, and 6 days later also with dengue fever. In six cases, the initial diagnosis was SARS-CoV-2/DENV co-infection. These patients were initially diagnosed with both infections due to previous observations of co-infection cases in the HUB hospital. For the Case1 patient, the initial hypothesis was actually a reaction to the flu vaccine, however, the presence of ecchymosis justified further investigation which led to dengue fever diagnosis. The timeline for variations in initial diagnosis from April to September 2020 are shown in Fig. 2. Four of the six cases initially diagnosed as dengue occurred in the first 2 months of the pandemic (Fig. 2).

Table 2 Initial diagnosis; delay between first diagnosis and final diagnosis of co-infection; therapeutic intervention; outcomes and follow-up of COVID-19/dengue cases
Fig. 2

Timeline presenting the initial diagnosis established in the 13 SARS-CoV-2/DENV co-infection cases reported by the Hospital Universitário de Brasília since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil. The x-axis divisions represent weeks. Background lines represent the epidemic curves for dengue fever (blue line) and COVID-19 (red line), based on official reports from the Brazilian Ministry of Health [7, 12]

Antibiotics were used as part of the therapeutic intervention in five cases; anticoagulants were used in two cases; analgesics were used in eight cases; prednisone in one case, and hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine in one case. The prednisone dosage was increased for the two patients with pre-existing hypopituitarism. Additionally, two patients self-medicated with ivermectin. Non-pharmacological measures were also applied, such as hydration with 0.9% sodium chloride infusion in three cases and oxygen in one patient. In total, four patients were hospitalized. None of the patients presented dengue fever with warning signs or severe dengue, and none of them were transferred to an intensive care unit or died. Clinical improvement was verified in all patients after a maximum of 21 days. Table 2 summarizes diagnosis, therapeutic interventions, outcomes and follow-up information for each of the 13 cases.


The COVID-19 pandemic has had a severe impact with millions of deaths worldwide [1]. In dengue-endemic regions, the situation is aggravated by socio-economic aspects and the occurrence of epidemic arboviruses [3]. In addition to the first case reported in Brazil, also in the Federal District [11], SARS-CoV-2/DENV co-infection cases were reported in other tropical and developing countries, where these infections are also considered a defying public health problem [13,14,15]. The co-infection cases described to date, together with the 13 cases reported herein, highlight the difficulty in reaching the final diagnosis, since both diseases share similar signs, symptoms and laboratory features. These obstacles in the diagnostic process can be detrimental to the patient’s condition and increase the burden on the healthcare system, especially in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, as these are diseases with substantial morbidity and mortality [3].

The precise diagnosis of COVID-19 alone is already a significant challenge in clinical practice as the differential diagnosis with influenza and other respiratory infections must be considered. This problem is reflected in the number of deaths by respiratory diseases reported between March and November of 2020 in Brazil, where a 1225% increase in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and a 40% increase in undetermined deaths (deaths linked to respiratory diseases, but not conclusive) can be seen when compared to the same period in 2019 [16]. In this sense, other endemic febrile diseases complicate the clinical picture even further.

The differential diagnosis problem with febrile diseases becomes evident after analyzing the cases reported here, where the similarities between symptoms in the initial stages of COVID-19 and dengue fever, or asymptomatic presentation of one of them, delayed the diagnosis of concomitant infections (Table 2). Even retro-orbital pain, a symptom usually associated with dengue, is being commonly reported in COVID-19 cases [17]. In the context of this case series, at the start of the pandemic dengue fever was usually the first diagnosis contemplated by physicians (Fig. 2), and co-infection with SARS-CoV-2 was, therefore, determined with delay. Fortunately, during the course of the pandemic, healthcare professionals started to consider the possibility of concomitant infections in the initial diagnosis, as highlighted in Fig. 2.

As dengue fever and COVID-19 require different clinical management, incorrect or delayed diagnosis can have serious consequences [11]. The use of anticoagulants is especially concerning since they are frequently used in COVID-19 patients to protect against thrombotic events, but should be avoided in all patients with dengue fever, as they can increase the risk of thrombocytopenia and even trigger Reyes syndrome, a rare condition characterized by hepatitis and encephalopathy [17]. Furthermore, several factors, such as hypertension, diabetes, obesity and old age, that are associated with poor prognosis in COVID-19 [18], may also complicate dengue fever. Some of these factors are present in the co-infected patients reported here, and in previously reported cases [15].

Some clinical and epidemiological clues can aid differential diagnosis. Generally, the seasonality is opposite: respiratory infections are usually reported in winter whereas dengue is usually in summer. However, COVID-19 cases in Brazil do not follow a clear seasonal pattern, as commonly observed for influenza and other respiratory viruses. It is not yet clear whether COVID-19 will become seasonal or will continue to spread throughout the year, especially because of its stability in comparison to other respiratory viruses (such as influenza) and the presence of an immunologically-susceptible population [19]. Meanwhile, public health policies and individual countermeasures are in place to mitigate the spread.

The usual findings of thrombocytopenia and lymphopenia are common in both diseases [20, 21]. However, cavitary effusions and bleeding are not commonly observed in COVID-19, which should raise suspicion, even with pulmonary clear ground-glass opacities typical of such infection. The diagnosis of COVID-19 during a pandemic might impact and lead to a reduction in the number of dengue cases diagnosed, contributing to underdiagnosis and delayed fluid interventions, which are lifesaving in severe dengue cases [22]. Official reports issued by the Brazilian Ministry of Health showed a decrease in the number of dengue cases and deaths compared to 2019, possibly fueled by resource and personnel allocation to SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis in Brazil [7], which could have led not only to under-reporting of cases and deterioration in surveillance, but also a worsening in control interventions [2].

An additional limitation is mainly related to the serological response of these infections. The low specificity of some rapid tests and commercial kits designed to detect IgM antibody for DENV cross-reactivity must be considered [23]. In addition, the possibility of a hospital-acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection is also a factor to be taken into consideration in patients hospitalized due to severe dengue.

Regarding cross-reactivity, confirmatory diagnosis via RT-PCR for DENV would be ideal. However, in the context of clinical practice, confirmation by RT-PCR is frequently not the most common approach as clinical management of dengue fever is decided primarily on signs and symptoms [24]. IgM ELISA or NS1 tests are often preferred as they are more available, and more affordable, in dengue-endemic regions [25,26,27]. In addition, the serological sample collection time offers more flexibility, while the higher stability of immunoglobulins facilitates transportation [26].

In addition, although it is known that clinical manifestations can vary according to serotype [28], in the Federal District, RT-PCR results are only released in up to 12 working days [29], by which time the symptoms have already subsided in the majority of cases [24]. Therefore, health professionals often use serological tests to confirm dengue diagnosis. That said, information about the circulating serotypes can be obtained from the weekly regional epidemiological bulletins that register the infrequently reported serotype identification. Between January and September of 2020, these bulletins reported 312 DENV-1 and 16 DENV-2 serotype identifications in the residencial areas of the patients included in the present study [7]. Nonetheless, lack of identification of the dengue serotype is a limitation of this study as it has clinical and epidemiological significance [28]. An experimental design incorporating the RT-PCR test for DENV should be considered for future studies.


This study presents a detailed case series of SARS-CoV-2/DENV co-infection in the Federal District, Midwestern Brazil. Despite being limited by a retrospective study design, a reduced number of cases, restricted testing capacity of the Brazilian healthcare system and some unavailable data, this case series is a source of valuable information that is currently missing in the literature. Our study demonstrates that failure to consider a SARS-CoV-2/DENV co-infection may impact both individual and community levels, especially in endemic areas. Other vector-borne infections such as chikungunya, Zika and malaria are highly prevalent in many tropical areas, and how respective co-infections with COVID-19 impact lethality requires further observational studies. Both diseases could be more lethal among more vulnerable populations who have less access to a high-quality health system, despite the universal incidence in all social levels. Therefore, the constant gathering of information and discussion about co-infections is crucial to improve diagnosis, clinical management and prevention measures.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available so as to not compromise patient anonymity. However, this data is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.



Coronavirus disease-2019


Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2


Dengue virus


Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction


Non-structural protein 1


Immunoglobulin M


Acute Respiratory Febrile Syndrome


Acute Undifferentiated Febrile Syndrome


  1. 1.

    World Health Organization. WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard. 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 7]. Available from:

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Olive M-M, Baldet T, Devillers J, Fite J, Paty M-C, Paupy C, et al. The COVID-19 pandemic should not jeopardize dengue control. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14(9):e0008716.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Butt MH, Ahmad A, Misbah S, Mallhi TH, Khan YH. Dengue fever and COVID-19 coinfection; a threat to public health for coepidemic in Pakistan. J Med Virol. 2020;93(2):671–2.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Miah MA, Husna A. Coinfection, coepidemics of COVID-19, and dengue in dengue-endemic countries: a serious health concern. J Med Virol. 2020;93(1):161–2.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Nacher M, Douine M, Gaillet M, Flamand C, Rousset D, Rousseau C, et al. Simultaneous dengue and COVID-19 epidemics: difficult days ahead? Samy AM, editor. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14(8):e0008426.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Cardona-Ospina JA, Arteaga-Livias K, Villamil-Gómez WE, Pérez-Díaz CE, Katterine Bonilla-Aldana D, Mondragon-Cardona Á, et al. Dengue and COVID-19, overlapping epidemics? An analysis from Colombia. J Med Virol. 2020;93(1):522–7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Brazilian Ministry of Health. Boletim Epidemiologico no36 - Monitoramento dos casos de arboviroses urbanas transmitidas pelo Aedes aegypti (dengue, chikungunya e zika), semanas epidemiológicas 1 a 34, 2020. Brasilia; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Churakov M, Villabona-Arenas CJ, Kraemer MUG, Salje H, Cauchemez S. Spatio-temporal dynamics of dengue in Brazil: seasonal travelling waves and determinants of regional synchrony. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13(4):e0007012.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Salam N, Mustafa S, Hafiz A, Chaudhary AA, Deeba F, Parveen S. Global prevalence and distribution of coinfection of malaria, dengue and chikungunya: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):710.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Magalhães BML, Siqueira AM, Alexandre MAA, Souza MS, Gimaque JB, Bastos MS, et al. P vivax Malaria and Dengue Fever Co-infection: A Cross-Sectional Study in the Brazilian Amazon. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8(10):e3239.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Bicudo N, Bicudo E, Costa JD, Castro JALP, Barra GB. Co-infection of SARS-CoV-2 and dengue virus: a clinical challenge. Brazilian J Infect Dis. 2020;24(5):452–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Brazilian Ministry of Health. Coronavirus Panel. Coronavirus Brazil. 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 7]. Available from:

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Hariadi P, Lokida D, Naysilla AM, Lukman N, Kosasih H, Mardian Y, et al. Coinfection with SARS-CoV-2 and dengue virus: a case report; 2020.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ridwan R. COVID-19 and dengue: a deadly duo. Trop Dr. 2020;50(3):270–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Saddique A, Rana MS, Alam MM, Ikram A, Usman M, Salman M, et al. Emergence of co-infection of COVID-19 and dengue: a serious public health threat. J Infect. 2020;81(6):e16–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Portal da Transparência do Registro Civil. Central Nacional de Informações do Registro Civil (CRC Nacional). Óbitos por doenças respiratórias - Painel Registral. 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Bhatia V, Kaul U. Dengue fever, thrombocytopaenia and management issues in post-coronary stenting patients. AsiaIntervention. 2017 [cited 2021 Jun 23]. Available from:

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Grasselli G, Greco M, Zanella A, Albano G, Antonelli M, Bellani G, et al. Risk factors associated with mortality among patients with COVID-19 in intensive care units in Lombardy, Italy. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180(10):1345–55.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Audi A, AlIbrahim M, Kaddoura M, Hijazi G, Yassine HM, Zaraket H. Seasonality of respiratory viral infections: will COVID-19 follow suit? Front Public Health. 2020;8.

  20. 20.

    Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, Qu J, Gong F, Han Y, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):507–13.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Oliveira ECL, Pontes ERJC, Cunha RV, Froes IB, Nascimento D. Hematological abnormalities in patients with dengue. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2009;42(6):682–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Kalayanarooj S, Rothman AL, Srikiatkhachorn A. Case management of dengue: lessons learned. J Infect Dis. 2017;215(suppl_2):S79–88.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Yan G, Lee CK, Lam LTM, Yan B, Chua YX, Lim AYN, et al. Covert COVID-19 and false-positive dengue serology in Singapore. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(5):536.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Brazilian Ministry of Health. DENGUE diagnóstico e manejo clínico adulto e criança. 2016 [cited 2021 Jun 23]. Available from:

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Uddin MN, Nath RK, Barua PK, Das KK, Banik S, Biswas RSR. Clinical and serological study of recent dengue outbreak in Chittagong, Bangladesh. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2021.

  26. 26.

    World Health Organization. LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS AND DIAGNOSTIC TESTS. In: Dengue: Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment, Prevention and Control: New Edition. 2009 [cited 2021 Jun 20]. Available from:

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Chan HBY, How CH, Ng CWM. Definitive tests for dengue fever: When and which should I use? Singapore Med J. 2017.

  28. 28.

    Balmaseda A, Hammond SN, Pérez L, Tellez Y, Saborío SI, Mercado JC, et al. Serotype-specific differences in clinical manifestations of dengue. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;74(3):449–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Laboratório Central de Saúde Pública do Distrito Federal. Dengue PCR – Laboratório Central de Saúde Pública. 2020 [cited 2021 Jun 25]. Available from:

    Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to thank the Research Support Nucleus of Sabin Medicina Diagnostica for performing the reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests for SARS-CoV-2 and NS1 tests for DENV for 4/13 patients as a courtesy.


MVGL and LAN are fellows of the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq). JDB-S is supported by the Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Amazonas (FAPEAM). We also acknowledge the ArboControl Brazil Project funded by the MINISTRY OF HEALTH, under process no. TED 74/2016 & TED 42/2017 for financial support and fellowships. The funders had no role in study design, data collection, manuscript preparation or the decision to publish.

Author information




HLS prepared the manuscript draft; HLS, MVGL, JDB-S, LAN and LSE described and discussed the cases; ETG, MSF, VPL, CHRER, CCS, LMPS and APMGR were involved in the clinical management of the patients and data collection; HLS, SRPSC, CPA, CMG, PSK, LMHM and LSE revised the manuscript and contributed with intellectual input. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laila Salmen Espindola.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The cases were reported by a team of treating physicians in the COVID-19 and endemic diseases co-infections study, approved by Brazil’s National Committee of Ethics under CAAE 34164820.6.0000.0030. All patients signed an informed consent form.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schulte, H.L., Brito-Sousa, J.D., Lacerda, M.V.G. et al. SARS-CoV-2/DENV co-infection: a series of cases from the Federal District, Midwestern Brazil. BMC Infect Dis 21, 727 (2021).

Download citation


  • COVID-19
  • Dengue
  • SARS-CoV-2
  • DENV
  • Co-infection
  • Case series