Skip to main content

Dengue in Western Uganda: a prospective cohort of children presenting with undifferentiated febrile illness

Abstract

Background

The spatial distribution and burden of dengue in sub-Saharan Africa remains highly uncertain, despite high levels of ecological suitability. The goal of this study was to describe the epidemiology of dengue among a cohort of febrile children presenting to outpatient facilities located in areas of western Uganda with differing levels of urbanicity and malaria transmission intensity.

Methods

Eligible children were first screened for malaria using rapid diagnostic tests. Children with a negative malaria result were tested for dengue using a combination NS1/IgM/IgG rapid test (SD Bioline Dengue Duo). Confirmatory testing by RT-PCR was performed in a subset of participants. Antigen-capture ELISA was performed to estimate seroprevalence.

Results

Only 6 of 1416 (0.42%) children had a positive dengue rapid test, while none of the RT-PCR results were positive. ELISA testing demonstrated reactive IgG antibodies in 28 (2.2%) participants with the highest prevalence seen at the urban site in Mbarara (19 of 392, 4.9%, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Overall, these findings suggest that dengue, while present, is an uncommon cause of non-malarial, pediatric febrile illness in western Uganda. Further investigation into the eocological factors that sustain low-level transmission in urban settings are urgently needed to reduce the risk of epidemics.

Peer Review reports

Background

Dengue is a mosquito-borne viral disease that is estimated to cause upwards of 400 million infections each year [1, 2]. While more than half of the world’s population is thought to be at risk, the global burden of dengue remains highly uncertain [3]. Nowhere is this epidemiological uncertainty more pronounced than in Africa, where the requisite laboratory infrastructure to distinguish dengue from other causes of febrile illness is not routinely available [4, 5]. Despite limited data, there is reasonable consensus for the existence of endemic dengue transmission in many countries, with modeling frameworks suggesting that Africa’s disease burden may be similar to that of other high transmission areas, such as the Americas [1].

The East African highlands, including areas of Uganda, Rwanda, and Burundi, represent a region of especially high uncertainly [3]. While previous studies of pediatric admission at sentinel sites across Uganda demonstrated a relatively low prevalence of arboviral infections, these findings are limited by the spatial and temporal trends in sampling. In contrast, the indirect evidence supporting endemic dengue transmission in Uganda is relatively strong. There are favorable precipitation and temperature conditions, the Aedes aegypti mosquito - the primary vector of dengue, along with yellow fever and Rift Valley fever - is ubiquitous in Uganda. Dengue outbreaks and transmission have been documented in neighboring countries, and cases have been reported among travelers returning from Uganda [1, 6, 7]. Other factors favoring the likelihood of dengue transmission in Uganda include an increasingly globalized economy and rapid urbanization [8, 9].

While the majority of dengue infections result in either asymptomatic or mild, self-limited clinical disease, the potential health system and economic impact of dengue transmission in a malaria-endemic country like Uganda represents an important knowledge gap. Given the non-specific symptoms and lack of available diagnostic tools, dengue infections may frequently be misdiagnosed and empirically treated as malaria [7]. This likely contributes to (i) over-estimation of malaria transmission, (ii) over-use of artemisinin combination therapies (ACT), perhaps accelerating to the development of resistance, and (iii) inadequate resourcing of dengue surveillance and control measures, which generally do not overlap with malaria control strategies such as insecticide-treated nets (ITN) [10].

Defining the burden of dengue in Uganda is critically important, especially as new tools such as vaccines become more widely available [11]. Therefore, the overarching aim of this study was to describe the epidemiology of dengue among a cohort of children presenting to outpatient public health facilities in western Uganda with acute febrile illness.

Methods

Study setting

The study was conducted at two sites in the Kasese District and one site in the Mbarara District of Southwest Uganda (Fig. 1). These facilities were purposefully selected to examine dengue as a potential cause of non-malarial febrile illness across different ecological settings and in areas of varying malaria transmission intensity [12] (Table 1). While little is known about the seasonality of dengue transmission in Uganda, malaria transmission is characterized by semi-annual transmission peaks typically following the end of the rainy seasons [13]. Therefore, the study was planned to take place over a period of at least 6 months to capture both rainy and dry seasons. There are no government-provided diagnostic tools or standardized treatment protocols for dengue fever at public health facilities in Uganda [14].

Fig. 1
figure1

Map showing location of study sites and population density of each location

Table 1 Description of clinical sites

Study design

The study was a prospective, observational cohort design, enrolling children seeking care for febrile illness from November 2017 to June 2018. Children (age < 18 years) presenting to one of three outpatient clinics with documented fever (axillary temperature ≥ 38o celsius [C]) or a reported history of fever within the last 7 days were eligible. Children presenting without a parent or guardian to provide consent were excluded. After consent was provided, study personnel recorded demographic information, vital signs, and administered a brief health questionnaire (Supplementary Annex 1).

Laboratory staff performed a malaria rapid diagnostic test (mRDT) (SD Bioline Malaria Ag P.f, Standard Diagnostics, Republic of Korea) and collected dried blood spots (DBS) on filter paper (Whatman, Chicago, IL). DBS sampling was chosen as a pragmatic but effective option for sampling children across the different field conditions at our study sites [15]. The reliability of measuring antibodies eluted from DBS has been validated several times, [16, 17] and we and others have used DBS-based serology to study the epidemiology of arboviruses in both standard ELISA as well as multiplex platforms [18,19,20]. Children with a positive mRDT result were excluded from further participation. Children with a negative mRDT result subsequently underwent testing with a dengue rapid diagnostic test (dRDT) (SD Bioline Dengue Duo, Standard Diagnostics Korea). Using excess dRDTs, we also tested a subset of participants with a positive mRDT to explore the possibility of dengue-malaria co-infection. Participants at the Mbarara site located at the Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital outpatient clinic, where reliable sample processing and storage facilities were available, had 5 mL of venous rather than capillary blood drawn into serum serparator tubes for further testing in addition to the dRDT.

Results of the dRDT were provided to the responsible clinician for the purposes of counseling and case management. Treatment and disposition (i.e. admission versus discharge) plans, as determined by the clinician, were recorded. DBS were stored at room temperature under desiccation and serum samples were stored at − 20 °C until analysis.

Laboratory methods

All RDTs for the study were obtained directly from the manufacturer, stored in the original packaging at room temperature, and used in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions prior to the expiration date. In brief, whole blood, either capillary (i.e. via finger prick) or venous was applied directly into the specimen wells of the malaria and/or dengue RDT. Assay diluent was added into the round well of the malaria and dengue IgM/IgG cassettes and the test was allowed to run for 15–20 min. Two staff members recorded the RDT results. A third, senior staff member adjudicated any discrepancies between the initial reads.

Further description of specific procedures is provided below.

Elution of dried blood spots for serologic analysis

Plasma proteins were eluted from DBS as previously described [18,19,20]. One 6-mm hole punch of each DBS was placed in a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube with 300 μL of phosphate-buffered saline, and rotated for 2 h at 37 °C. This yielded an eluate that is equivalent to a 1:40 plasma dilution. Eppendorf tubes were centrifuged then eluate transferred to a new tube. Eluate was heat inactivated for 30 min in a 56 °C water bath. The samples were centrifuged again to pellet proteinaceous debris and the supernatant was transferred to a new tube and stored at 4 °C for up to 1 week or at − 20 °C until use.

Antigen capture IgG ELISA

Binding IgG to DENV or ZIKV was measured by antigen capture ELISA as previously described [21]. Briefly, DENV antigen (an equal volume mixture of supernatant from each of the four DENV serotypes cultured in C6/36 cells) was captured by the anti-E protein mouse mAb 4G2 [22]. Plates were blocked with 3% nonfat dry milk, and incubated with DBS eluate at 37 °C for 1 h, and binding was detected with an alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-human IgG secondary Ab and p-nitrophenyl phosphate substrate. Absorbance at 405 nm (optical density, OD) was measured by spectrophotometry on a plate reader. ELISA data are reported as OD values that are the average of technical replicates. The average OD for technical replicates using DBS eluate obtained from flavivirus-naïve individuals (NHS) served as the negative control in ELISA assays. The cut off for positivity was calculated for each plate as the average OD of NHS = standard deviations + 0.1 [18,19,20].

IgM ELISA

Testing for anti-DENV IgM was only performed on participant samples with either a positive dRDT or IgG ELISA per CDC MAC ELISA protocol after titrating individual reagents per instructions [23]. DBS eluate was tested at 1:40 dilution. DENV1–4 antigen was the same as for IgG ELISA above. Plates were washed 3 times between each step. The Enhanced K-Blue TMB substrate reaction was stopped after 30 min by addition of 50 μL 1 N HCl. Optical density (OD) of each well was determined within 5 min at 450 nm.

Neutralization assays

Neutralization titers were determined by 96-well microFRNT [24, 25]. Due to limited sample availability from DBS, an abbreviated neutralization assay format was used (eFRNT). DBS eluates were run in singleton over four 4-fold dilutions. Serial dilutions of DBS eluate were mixed with approximately 75–100 focus-forming units of virus in DMEM with 2% FBS. The virus-antibody mixtures were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C and then transferred to a monolayer of Vero cells for infection for 2 h at 37 °C. OptiMEM overlay media supplemented with 2% FBS and 5 g (1%) Carboxymethylcellulose was then added, and cultures were incubated for 48 h (DENV2 and DENV4) or 52 h (DENV1, DENV3). Cells were fixed with 100 μL of 1:1 methanol:acetone for 30 min. 100 μL of permeabilization buffer was added for 10 min followed by 100 μL of blocking buffer (3% normal goat plasma in permeabilization buffer) and left overnight at 4 °C. 50 μL of 4G2 at 12.5 ng/μL were added to the plates and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. Cells were washed with a microplate washer followed by the addition of 50 μl of 1:3000 horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary antibody for 1 h at 37 °C. Foci were visualized with 100 μL of True Blue and counted with a user-supervised automated counting program on 2x-magnified images of micro-wells obtained on a CTL ELISPOT reader. NHS controls were included on every plate to define 100% infection. The eFRNT value is a discrete number corresponding to the dilution factor at which 50% maximum FFU are observed or the average of the two dilution factors between which 50% FFU is crossed.

Real-time polymerase chain reaction

Whole blood was drawn into serum serparator tubes and centrifuged. Viral RNA was extracted from 140 μL of serum using the QIAamp extraction kit (QIAGEN Hilden, Germany) and eluted in 60 μL. Real time PCR was performed on the Rotor-Gene Q (QIAGEN Hilden, Germany) platform using the RealStar® kits for Dengue, V2.0, Chikungunya, V2.0 and Zika V.1.0 (Altona Diganostics, Hamburg, Germany) in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions.

Statistical analysis

Data was collected in a REDCap database and analyzed with Stata 15.1 (College Station, TX) [26]. We summarized participant characteristics and compared them between those with positive and negative mRDT resuts using Student’s t-test (normally distributed data) or Wilcoxon rank-sum test (nonparametric data) for continuous variables and Pearson χ2 test for categorical variables. We determined the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of malaria among individuals with self-reported bed net use as the primary explanatory variable using generalized negative binomial regression models with robust standard errors. In a post-hoc analysis, we performed multivariable regression analyses to explore the demographic, geographic, and clinical parameters associated with the primary outcome of interest: a positive dengue IgG. All variables that were significant in univariate models with a pre-specified p-value of < 0.25 were included in the subsequent multivariate analysis [27]. A resulting p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant in the final models.

Results

A total of 1702 children met the eligibility criteria and were screened for malaria with a mRDT. Complete laboratory results were available for 1693 (99.5%) particpants, who were subsequently included in the analysis. Characteristics of the cohort are summarized in Table 2. The median age was 5 years (IQR 2–10), although children at Bugoye were significantly older (10 years, IQR 5–14, p < 0.0001), likely attributable to an existing village-based, community health worker led fever management intervention targeting children less than 5 years of age and reducing the number of these patients that presented to our study site [28].

Table 2 Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study cohort

Overall, 369 children (21.8%) had a positive mRDT result. The lowest rate was observed at MRRH (17 of 455, 3.7, 95% CI 2.3–5.9), whereas much higher rates were seen in Kasese (138 of 606, 22.8, 95% CI 19.6–26.3) and Bugoye (214 of 632, 33.9, 95% CI 30.3–37.7). Self-reported ITN use was associated with a protective effect against malaria (IRR 0.70, 95% CI 0.54–0.90, p = 0.006), but when the analysis was limited only to the high-transmission areas with higher risk, the protective effect was no longer significant (IRR 0.85, 95% CI 0.65–1.11, p = 0.25).

There was overlap in self-reported symptoms between children with positive and negative mRDT results (Table 2). Among all participants, cough (69.1%), headache (63.6%), and rhinorrhea (53.0%) were the most frequently reported symptoms. A total of 431 (25.4%) participants reported all three of these symptoms, 364 (84.5%) of whom had a negative mRDT result. Participants with a negative mRDT were also more likely to have sought care and received treatment for malaria within the past 14 days. In contrast, arthralgia and myalgia were more frequently reported in the mRDT positive group.

Of the 1324 participants with a negative mRDT test result, 1285 (97.1%) had an evaluable dRDT result, of which 5 (0.39%) had a positive result, defined as a visible NS1, IgM, or IgG band. Individual tests results include one child with positive IgM bands, three with positive IgG bands, and one with positive IgM and IgG bands. There were three positive dRDT results in Bugoye, two in Mbarara, and and one in Kasese (Fig. 2) All 414 samples from MRRH tested by RT-PCR were negative for DENV, CHIKV, and ZIKV.

Fig. 2
figure2

Summary of study participantion and test results stratified by study site

Serological testing of 1247 (94.2%) DBS samples from participants with a negative mRDT test result identified reactive IgG antibodies in 28 (2.3%) participants. Demographic and clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 3. There was a significant difference in seroprevalence between Mbarara (19 of 392, 4.9%), which is a more urban center, and the rural sites (Kasese 2 of 453, 0.4%; Bugoye 7 of 414, 1.7%; p < 0.001). The Mbarara study site was the only significant predictor of a dengue infection in the multivariable analysis when using Kasese as the reference, although there was a statistical trend towards males being at higher risk of infection (p = 0.10) (Table 4). Samples that were positive by RDT or IgG ELISA were also tested by eFRNT and DENV IgM-ELISA, but none were positive for IgM antibodies.

Table 3 Demographic and clinical characteristics of participants stratified by Dengue IgG result
Table 4 Regression modeling of variables associated with presence of dengue IgG

Of the 28 participants with a reactive IgG antibodies by ELISA, only 1 (3.6%) had a positive IgG band on the dRDT. This occurred in the one patient with both IgM and IgG bands positive on the dRDT. Overall, the correlation in IgG results between the dRDT and ELISA was poor (κ = 0.06, 95% CI 0–0.40).

Among those with a negative mRDT result, 1297 of 1324 (98.0%) received treatment with an antibiotic, including five who also received treatment with artemether/lumefantrine (AL). An additional 17 (1.3%) received treatment with AL (and no antibiotic) despite negative mRDT test results. There were no differences in the rate of antibiotic administration between children with a reactive IgG antibody result and those without (96.4% vs. 97.48%, p = 0.73). The vast majority of children (1279 of 1316, 97.2%) were discharged from the outpatient clinics, while 35 (2.7%) were admitted. Children with a anti-dengue IgG were admitted from the outpatient clinic at a higher rate, although the absolute number of admissions was low (3, 11.1% vs. 26, 2.3%, p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in admission rates by sex, age category, or clinical site.

Discussion

Despite favorable climate and ecology, our findings suggest that dengue is an uncommon cause of non-malarial, pediatric febrile illness in western Uganda. Our results are consistent with those obtained from a laboratory-based surveillance system of inpatient pediatric admissions across six sentinel sites in Uganda, which reported recent arboviral infection in only 18 of 622 (2.9%) samples tested [29], as well as multi-site seroprevalence study of healthy adult blood donors, which identified dengue antibodies in 72 of 1744 (4.1%) of donors [30]. However, these data exclude neither the possibility of sporadic dengue outbreaks in the past or future nor the possibility that dengue or other Aedes-borne viruses could establish endemicity in this region given the favorable ecological conditions. Our time-limited and geographically-restricted study design, however, does provide a robust snapshot of current arbovirus transmission. While seroprevalence studies that include older subjects may increase the sensivtivity for detecting historic dengue transmission, our findings do provide strong evidence for the presence of low-level transmission, particularly at the more urban site in Mbarara. In areas of higher transmission, dengue seroprevalence is typically 20% or greater in young children [31,32,33]. The few cases detected here, along with the large susceptible population make dengue introduction a major concern, and surveillance together with further investigation of the demographic, spatial, and entomologic factors that could support epidemic and endemic dengue infection in urban East Africa should be a high priority.

Given the low number of positive cases, a rigorous assessment of the performance of the dengue rapid diagnostic tests was not possible. The relatively poor correlation in IgG results between the dRDT and the ELISA is consistent with a study of febrile outpatients conducted in the Democratic Republic of Congo, which showed 2.5% IgG positivity by dRDT and 34.0% positivity by ELISA with an estimated sensitivity of 7.6% [34]. It is crucial to note that dRDT are designed for use in the setting of acute infection and not for seroprevalence studies. The main advantage of including IgG testing in this context is in secondary infection, when IgG may rise quickly and dramatically, suppressing the IgM response and limiting unbound dengue antigen present in serum [35]. In primary infection, patients would typically present before an IgG response has developed. A recent systematic review evaluated the potential of dRDT to function as a measure of seroprevalence but found performance to be suboptimal, with sensitivity ranging from 30 to 60% [36].

Our results do highlight the urgent need for better diagnostics and management algorithms for children with acute febrile illness. Malaria was identified as the cause of fever in only 22% of participants, and among participants with a negative malaria test, nearly 80% reported cough or rhinorrhea with more than half (51.1%) reporting both symptoms. While not confirmed by microbiologic or molecular methods, many of these children likely had viral infections, including other arboviral diseases such as West Nile or Chikungunya [30], that would be self-limited and not require antibiotic treatment [37]. Yet more than 97% of children with a negative malaria test result across all three sites received a course of antibiotic treatment. Given the growing global threat of antimicrobial resistance, driven in part by antimicrobial overuse, this patient population represents an important target for antibiotic stewardship interventions.

To our knowledge, our study is one of the first to examine the burden of dengue among children presenting to outpatient clinics in western Uganda with undifferentiated febrile illness. Strengths of our approach include the diverse geography of the clinical sites, large sample size, and different diagnostic testing strategies (i.e. dRDT, ELISA, PCR). The study also has a number of limitations. First, we excluded children with a positive mRDT from further consideration. While dengue-malaria coinfections have been reported in other countries [7, 38, 39], this was expected to be a relatively infrequent occurrence. To explore this possibility, however, we tested 131 mRDT positive children at the Kasese site, only one (0.77%) of who had a positive IgM band on the dRDT; a prevalence similar to children with a negative mRDT (p = 0.53). Second, our facility-based and temporally-limited enrollment strategy may have missed focal outbreaks of dengue in the community. Dengue is well-known to emerge rapidly in non-immune populations then quickly disappear. Studies from neighboring countries and other surveillance methods do, however, support the validity of our findings. Third, we did experience some attrition of samples, due to improper labeling, inadequate specimen, or loss/damage in transport. We were, however, able to complete dRDT and ELISA testing in more than 97 and 94% of eligible participants, respectively. Fourth, IgG ELISA may overestimate dengue prevalence as this assay may also detect cross-reactive antibodies elicited by infection by related flaviviruses, though neutralization testing also supported prior infection by dengue for some subjects in this population [40, 41]. Lastly, we did not have the means to screen all specimens for anti-dengue IgM, which precluded a direct comparison of serologic IgM testing to the dRDT result.

Conclusions

Dengue does not account for a large proportion of non-malarial, acute febrile illness presentations in western Uganda. However, the presence of the vector and the pathogen, along with a large susceptible population make sporadic outbreaks a major concern. Further investigation into the ecological factors that sustain low-level transmission in urban centers such as our Mbarara site, are urgently needed.

Availability of data and materials

Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.

Abbreviations

ACT:

Artemisinin combination therapies

AL:

Artemether/lumefantrine

Co :

Degrees Celsius

CHIKV:

Chikungunya Virus

DBS:

Dried Blood Spot

DENV:

Dengue Virus

dRDT:

Dengue rapid diagnostic test

ELISA:

Enzyme Linked immunosorbent Assay

ITN:

Insecticide-treated nets

mRDT:

Malaria rapid diagnostic test

MRRH:

Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital

NS1:

Non-structural protein 1

OD:

Optical Density

RNA:

Ribonucleic acid

RT-PCR:

Reverse-Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction

ZIKV:

Zika Virus

References

  1. 1.

    Bhatt S, Gething PW, Brady OJ, Messina JP, Farlow AW, Moyes CL, Drake JM, Brownstein JS, Hoen AG, Sankoh O, et al. The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature. 2013;496(7446):504–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Simmons CP, Farrar JJ, Nguyen VV, Wills B. Dengue. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(15):1423–32.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Brady OJ, Gething PW, Bhatt S, Messina JP, Brownstein JS, Hoen AG, Moyes CL, Farlow AW, Scott TW, Hay SI. Refining the global spatial limits of dengue virus transmission by evidence-based consensus. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(8):e1760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    WHO. WHO report on global surveillance of epidemic-prone infectious diseases: dengue and dengue haemorrhagic fever. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Simo FBN, Bigna JJ, Kenmoe S, Ndangang MS, Temfack E, Moundipa PF, Demanou M. Dengue virus infection in people residing in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence studies. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):13626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Amarasinghe A, Kuritsk JN, Letson GW, Margolis HS. Dengue virus infection in Africa. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17(8):1349–54.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Chipwaza B, Mugasa JP, Selemani M, Amuri M, Mosha F, Ngatunga SD, Gwakisa PS. Dengue and Chikungunya fever among viral diseases in outpatient febrile children in Kilosa district hospital, Tanzania. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8(11):e3335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Jaenisch T, Junghanss T, Wills B, Brady OJ, Eckerle I, Farlow A, et al. Dengue expansion in Africa—not recognized or not happening? Emerg Infect Dis [Internet]. 2014. https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2010.140487.

  9. 9.

    Statistics UBo. National Population and housing census 2014. Kampala: Republic of Uganda; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Anders KL, Hay SI. Lessons from malaria control to help meet the rising challenge of dengue. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012;12(12):977–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Deng SQ, Yang X, Wei Y, Chen JT, Wang XJ, Peng HJ. A Review on Dengue Vaccine Development. Vaccines (Basel). 2020;8(1):63.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Uganda Bureau of Statistics. Uganda Malaria Indicator Survey 2014–15. Kampala, Uganda, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: International. UaI; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Yeka A, Gasasira A, Mpimbaza A, Achan J, Nankabirwa J, Nsobya S, Staedke SG, Donnelly MJ, Wabwire-Mangen F, Talisuna A, et al. Malaria in Uganda: challenges to control on the long road to elimination: I. epidemiology and current control efforts. Acta Trop. 2012;121(3):184–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Uganda Ministry of Health. National Guidelines for the Management of Common Conditions. Kampala, Uganda; 2016. http://library.health.go.ug/publications/guidelines/uganda-clinical-guidelines-2016.

  15. 15.

    Lim MD. Dried blood spots for Global Health diagnostics and surveillance: opportunities and challenges. Am J Trop Med Hygiene. 2018;99(2):256–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Andersen NJ, Mondal TK, Preissler MT, Freed BM, Stockinger S, Bell E, Druschel C, Louis GM, Lawrence DA. Detection of immunoglobulin isotypes from dried blood spots. J Immunol Methods. 2014;404:24–32.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Behets F, Kashamuka M, Pappaioanou M, Green TA, Ryder RW, Batter V, George JR, Hannon WH, Quinn TC. Stability of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 antibodies in whole blood dried on filter paper and stored under various tropical conditions in Kinshasa, Zaire. J Clin Microbiol. 1992;30(5):1179–82.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Corbett KS, Katzelnick L, Tissera H, Amerasinghe A, de Silva AD, de Silva AM. Preexisting neutralizing antibody responses distinguish clinically inapparent and apparent dengue virus infections in a Sri Lankan pediatric cohort. J Infect Dis. 2015;211(4):590–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Tissera H, Amarasinghe A, De Silva AD, Kariyawasam P, Corbett KS, Katzelnick L, Tam C, Letson GW, Margolis HS, de Silva AM. Burden of dengue infection and disease in a pediatric cohort in urban Sri Lanka. Am J Trop Med Hygiene. 2014;91(1):132–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Willcox AC, Collins MH, Jadi R, Keeler C, Parr JB, Mumba D, Kashamuka M, Tshefu A, de Silva AM, Meshnick SR. Seroepidemiology of dengue, Zika, and yellow fever viruses among children in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Am J Trop Med Hygiene. 2018;99(3):756–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    de Alwis R, Smith SA, Olivarez NP, Messer WB, Huynh JP, Wahala WM, White LJ, Diamond MS, Baric RS, Crowe JE Jr, et al. Identification of human neutralizing antibodies that bind to complex epitopes on dengue virions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(19):7439–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Henchal EA, Gentry MK, McCown JM, Brandt WE. Dengue virus-specific and flavivirus group determinants identified with monoclonal antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence. Am J Trop Med Hygiene. 1982;31(4):830–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Martin DA, Muth DA, Brown T, Johnson AJ, Karabatsos N, Roehrig JT. Standardization of immunoglobulin M capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for routine diagnosis of arboviral infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38(5):1823–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Collins MH, McGowan E, Jadi R, Young E, Lopez CA, Baric RS, Lazear HM, de Silva AM. Lack of durable cross-neutralizing antibodies against Zika virus from dengue virus infection. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23(5):773–81.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Swanstrom JA, Plante JA, Plante KS, Young EF, McGowan E, Gallichotte EN, Widman DG, Heise MT, de Silva AM, Baric RS. Dengue Virus Envelope Dimer Epitope Monoclonal Antibodies Isolated from Dengue Patients Are Protective against Zika Virus. mBio. 2016;7(4):e01123.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Hosmer D, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York: Wiley; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    English L, Miller JS, Mbusa R, Matte M, Kenney J, Bwambale S, Ntaro M, Patel P, Mulogo E, Stone GS. Monitoring iCCM referral systems: Bugoye integrated community case management initiative (BIMI) in Uganda. Malar J. 2016;15:247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Lamorde M, Mpimbaza A, Walwema R, Kamya M, Kapisi J, Kajumbula H, Sserwanga A, Namuganga JF, Kusemererwa A, Tasimwa H, et al. A cross-cutting approach to surveillance and laboratory capacity as a platform to improve health security in Uganda. Health Secur. 2018;16(S1):S76–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Clements TL, Rossi CA, Irish AK, Kibuuka H, Eller LA, Robb ML, Kataaha P, Michael NL, Hensley LE, Schoepp RJ. Chikungunya and O'nyong-nyong Viruses in Uganda: Implications for Diagnostics. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019;6(3):ofz001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    L'Azou M, Assoukpa J, Fanouillere K, Plennevaux E, Bonaparte M, Bouckenooghe A, Frago C, Noriega F, Zambrano B, Ochiai RL, et al. Dengue seroprevalence: data from the clinical development of a tetravalent dengue vaccine in 14 countries (2005-2014). Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2018;112(4):158–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Reller ME, de Silva AM, Miles JJ, Jadi RS, Broadwater A, Walker K, Woods C, Mayorga O, Matute A. Unsuspected dengue as a cause of acute febrile illness in children and adults in Western Nicaragua. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10(10):e0005026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Rojas DP, Barrera-Fuentes GA, Pavia-Ruz N, Salgado-Rodriguez M, Che-Mendoza A, Manrique-Saide P, Vazquez-Prokopec GM, Halloran ME, Longini IM, Gomez-Dantes H. Epidemiology of dengue and other arboviruses in a cohort of school children and their families in Yucatan, Mexico: baseline and first year follow-up. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(11):e0006847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Proesmans S, Katshongo F, Milambu J, Fungula B, Muhindo Mavoko H, Ahuka-Mundeke S, Inocencio da Luz R, Van Esbroeck M, Arien KK, Cnops L, et al. Dengue and chikungunya among outpatients with acute undifferentiated fever in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo: a cross-sectional study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13(9):e0007047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Peeling RW, Artsob H, Pelegrino JL, Buchy P, Cardosa MJ, Devi S, Enria DA, Farrar J, Gubler DJ, Guzman MG, et al. Evaluation of diagnostic tests: dengue. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8(12 Suppl):S30–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Luo R, Fongwen N, Kelly-Cirino C, Harris E, Wilder-Smith A, Peeling RW. Rapid diagnostic tests for determining dengue serostatus: a systematic review and key informant interviews. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019;25(6):659–66.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    D'Acremont V, Kilowoko M, Kyungu E, Philipina S, Sangu W, Kahama-Maro J, Lengeler C, Cherpillod P, Kaiser L, Genton B. Beyond malaria--causes of fever in outpatient Tanzanian children. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(9):809–17.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Monamele GC, Demanou M. First documented evidence of dengue and malaria co-infection in children attending two health centers in Yaounde, Cameroon. Pan Afr Med J. 2018;29:227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Mouiche MMM, Ntumvi NF, Maptue VT, Tamoufe U, Albert B, Ngum Ndze V, Nwobegahay J, Gillis A, LeBreton M, McIver DJ, et al. Evidence of low-level dengue virus circulation in the south region of Cameroon in 2018. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2020;20(4):314–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Allwinn R, Doerr HW, Emmerich P, Schmitz H, Preiser W. Cross-reactivity in flavivirus serology: new implications of an old finding? Med Microbiol Immunol. 2002;190(4):199–202.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Speer SD, Pierson TC. VIROLOGY. Diagnostics for Zika virus on the horizon. Science. 2016;353(6301):750–1.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank the clinical staff and patients of the Bugoye Health Centre, Kasese Health Centre, and Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital Outpatient Department for their participation and support. We also thank Corinna Keeler for the cartography support.

Funding

The study was supported by Takeda Vaccines. Standard Diagnostics provided the rapid diagnostic tests for the study at no cost. RMB is supported by the National Institutes of Health (K23AI141764). JJJ received support from National Institute of Health (K24AI13499). EJC is supported by the National Institutes of Health (5T32HL007106–43). Neither Takeda nor Standard Diagnostics nor had any role in the design or conduct of the study or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study conception and design: RMB, MHC, EM. Funding: RMB. Study implementation: RMB, RM, RN, EC MM, MN, DN, EM. Laboratory testing: RN, DN, SG, DE, YZ, MHC, JJJ. First draft of manuscript: RMB, SG, EC, MHC, DN. Revisions: All. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ross M. Boyce.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval of the study was provided by the institutional review boards of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (16–2128), the Mbarara University of Science and Technology (01/03–16), and the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology (HS 2115). Written informed consent for participation in the study was obtained from all adult participants or from their parent or guardian when participants were children (under 18 years old).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form and declare: no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous 3 years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boyce, R.M., Collins, M., Muhindo, R. et al. Dengue in Western Uganda: a prospective cohort of children presenting with undifferentiated febrile illness. BMC Infect Dis 20, 835 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-05568-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Dengue
  • Fever
  • Arbovirus
  • Epidemiology
  • Uganda