Skip to main content

Multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a report of cosmopolitan microbial migration and an analysis of best management practices

Abstract

Background

Tuberculosis (TB) control is a primary global health priority but the goal to eliminate TB is being threatened by the increase in incidence of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). With this series of seven MDR-TB cases in migrant patients with identical Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains we aim to illustrate the challenges encountered during therapy and follow-up: language barriers, access to care for migrant patients, depression due to isolation, adverse reactions to the treatment, management of pediatric TB, further contact tracing. We also discuss best practices for the management of complex MDR-TB cases in settings with low overall TB incidence focusing on modern diagnostic assays and an individualized and an interdisciplinary therapeutic approach.

Methods

We describe a case series of seven consecutively diagnosed MDR-TB patients, six of them treated at our tertiary care hospital between May 2018 and March 2020. Epidemiologic data was gained by semi-structured patient interviews and reconstruction of the migration route. The origin of the cluster was confirmed by genotyping of the TB-strains.

Results

Six related patients were diagnosed with pulmonary MDR-TB between May and August 2018. All had a positive Interferon-Gamma-Release Assay (IGRA), in five patients sputum microscopy was positive for acid-fast bacilli (AFB). The genetic and phenotypical drug susceptibility test did not match with MDR-TB strains from an East-African origin. The index patient was identified through genetical fingerprinting. By changing the therapy to a modern MDR-TB regime and using an interdisciplinary and culture-sensitive approach, all patients improved clinically and radiologically.

Conclusion

Human migration plays an important role for the global spread of MDR-TB in low incidence countries. Early case detection and adequate treatment are key to prevention of outbreaks. Especially language barriers and complex migration routes make genotyping of TB-strains a crucial tool to identify cases clusters, the potential index patient and transmission dynamics. We are fortunate enough to experience times in which new TB-antibiotics were made available and in which molecular assays revolutionized TB-diagnostics. We need to take advantage of that and develop personalized therapies for patients suffering from drug resistant TB.

Peer Review reports

Background

Tuberculosis (TB) is the leading cause of death from a single infectious agent [1]. The incidence of drug-resistant TB has increased steadily in the past years, threatening the goal to end the TB pandemic [1]. In patients with or multidrug-resistant (MDR-TB), defined as an infection by a Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) strain showing resistance to at least rifampicin and isoniazid treatment is expensive, unacceptably long, poorly tolerated and has a low success rate [2, 3]. The global spread of MTBC strains has been closely linked to human migration [4]. Armed conflicts, natural disasters and poverty have led to unprecedented forced displacement. In 2018, 70.8 million people, half of them children, were forced to flee their homes [5]. Newly notified TB case numbers are comparably low in North American and Western European nations and typically range below 25 per 100,000 people [6]. In these settings, previous TB treatment and a foreign-born status are the strongest risk factors for MDR-TB [7, 8]. Although genome-based molecular surveillance has significantly improved the assessment of TB transmission dynamics, it is still only irregularly used. Frequent relocation as well as language and cultural barriers pose significant challenges for contact tracing in migrant populations [9,10,11].

Based on a series of seven migrant patients with MDR-TB, we discuss best practices for the management of complex MDR-TB cases in settings with low overall TB incidence focusing on the state-of-the-art in diagnostics and personalized treatment, transmission, access to healthcare, social and language barriers.

Methods

Epidemiological methods/contact tracing

After diagnosing MDR-TB in two migrant patients (mother and child) that were infected with a M. tuberculosis strain resistant to isoniazid (INH), rifampicin (RMP), ethambutol (EMB), pyrazinamide (PZA), ethionamid (ETO) and moxifloxacin, a case series investigation was initiated. Contact tracing was pursued by semi-structured interviews in German, English and Arabic (Additional file 1). Contacts were considered persons that had had contact with the culture-confirmed cases during the symptomatic phase of TB disease before diagnosis. IGRA Tests, sputum analyses (smear, Tb-specific nucleic acid amplification test, culture) and chest X-rays were performed in all presumed contacts. The data were confirmed by genetic fingerprinting of TB in culture-positive contacts. In an attempt to identify the index-case, the semi-structured interviews focused on the exact migration route of each patient as well.

Drug susceptibility testing

MTBC isolates were obtained by culturing primary specimens in both liquid (BACTEC MGIT 960, Becton Dickinson Diagnostic Systems, Sparks, US) and on solid media (Löwenstein-Jensen and Stonebrink media). Phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST) for all drugs except cycloserin (solid medium) was performed using the MGIT 960 system at critical concentrations as recommended by WHO [12]. For molecular DST the Genotype MTBDRplus and MTBDRsl assays (HAIN lifescience GmbH, Nehren, Germany) were performed according to manufacturer recommendations. Mutations within the pyrazinamidase gene pncA were detected by amplification and DNA sequencing. Phenotypic DST of second-line antituberculous drugs were performed via the MGIT 960 system.

Whole genome sequencing

For strain comparison and extended analysis of resistance associated mutations whole genome sequencing (WGS) was performed with Illumina Technology using NextSeq500 and Nextera XT library preparation kits as instructed by the manufacturer (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Obtained reads were processed with the MTBseq pipeline calling variants with a minimum of 4 reads in both forward and reverse orientation, 4 reads calling the variant with at least a phred score of 20, and 75% variant frequency [13].

Clinical data

The clinical characteristics presented were the routine clinical data collected in the course of treatment and follow-up. No additional tests or procedures were performed for the sole purpose of this study.

Results

Microbiological data and genome-based molecular surveillance of TB

Six patients from two related migrant families originating from Sudan were diagnosed with MDR-TB caused by a MTBC strain showing a complex pattern of phenotypic resistance and resistance associated mutations for isoniazide (INH), rifampicin (RMP), ethambutol (EMB), pyrazinamide (PZA), ethionamid (ETO) and low-dose fluorochinolones - a strain that had never been diagnosed in Germany in patients originating from East Africa (Table 1). By contact-tracing via semi-structured interviews (Additional file 1) that was verified by genetic fingerprinting of TB, we identified the probable index patient (patient 7). It was a 50-year-old Georgian migrant that had lived in the same refugee accommodation with the families for 7 days before being diagnosed with MDR-TB. Data on contact tracing performed on the index patient were not available.

Table 1 Resistance pattern of the MDR-TB strain

Clinical and radiological findings

Three of the six patients were children: two infants and a 4-year old girl. The adults and the 4-year old girl had fled Sudan. Both infants (patients 2 and 6) were born in Germany and had been previously diagnosed with recurrent bronchitis unresponsive to symptomatic treatment but had never had an X-ray. None of them was infected with the human immunodeficiency virus.

In April 2018 a 21-year old woman (patient 1) and her 6 months old son (patient 2), were diagnosed with pulmonary TB non-responsive to standard quadruple therapy (INH, RMP, EMB, PZA). In May 2018, both patients were transferred to our infectious disease department for further care, no genotyping had been performed beforehand. Patient 1 had experienced fever, loss of appetite, weight loss, cough and dyspnea since January 2018. At diagnosis, sputum microscopy was highly positive for acid-fast bacilli (AFB) and culture became positive for MTB within 6 days. Chest X-rays showed left-sided lung cavities (Fig. 1a). Her breastfed son (patient 2) showed disseminated bronchial involvement, bilateral mediastinal lymphadenopathy, fever, and failure to thrive. In the course of subsequent contact tracing investigations, both the 29-year old husband (patient 3) and the 4-year old daughter (patient 4), who were clinically asymptomatic, showed highly positive Interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA)-Tests and radiographic signs of TB including mediastinal lymphadenopathy and apical pulmonary noduli. While patient 3 was culture-positive for TB, all mycobacteriological investigations for patient 4 remained negative (Table 2).

Fig. 1
figure1

Chest X-ray studies showing extensive TB-lung involvement in both the adult (left) and the pediatric patient (right)

Table 2 Patient characteristics

Two additional cases were identified within a closely related family: a 20- year old woman (patient 5) was asymptomatic but her sputum turned culture positive for M. tuberculosis. Chest CT scans revealed multiple granulomas in the apical lung segments and hilar lymphadenopathy. Her 6-months old son (patient 6) showed mediastinal lymphadenopathy with compression of the left main bronchus and an extensive left apical pulmonary infiltrate (Fig. 1b). M. tuberculosis was cultured from bronchoalveolar lavage. Disseminated TB was excluded in all children through abdominal ultrasound and lumbal puncture.

Treatment strategy, side-effects and outcomes

Treatment was initiated for all adult patients based on genotypic and phenotypic drug sensitivity testing results and included bedaquiline, clofazimine, linezolid, terizidone, amikacin, 4-aminosalicylic acid (PAS), and meropenem in combination with amoxicilin/clavulanic acid. The children received clofazimine, linezolid, terizidone, amikacin, and PAS. Both treatment strategies were designed taking into consideration the current TB national guidelines and the drug sensitivity results available at the time of referral [14]. Laboratory screening (serum creatinine, electrolytes, liver enzymes, thyroid stimulating hormone, haemoglobin and white blood count), assessment for peripheral neuropathy, audiometry, and electrocardiograms were performed following the current recommendations to monitor adverse effects. All patients developed slight liver enzymes elevations, mild high-frequency hearing loss during long-term treatment with aminoglycosides, bone marrow suppression while receiving linezolid and a mild hypothyroidism presumably associated with PAS. All patients exposed to oral PAS showed moderate gastrointestinal distress including bloating and nausea aggravating malnutrition especially in patient 1. Four of the patients developed a QTc-prolongation up to 493 msec.

Cohort isolation – by families – was necessary up to 7 months until three consecutive sputa were microscopically negative for AFB and culture was negative. Patient 5 became pregnant about 5 months into the isolation period and, after an uneventful pregnancy despite extensive TB treatment, she gave birth to a healthy child. The patients were discharged with continuation therapy of bedaquiline, levofloxacin, terizidone, clofazimine, and PAS in the adult cases or levofloxacin, terizidone, clofazimine, and PAS in the infant cases. Meropenem was discontinued to simplify outpatient care, the other antibiotics were chosen based on final drug sensitivity results and on drug tolerability. They all completed the treatment with no signs of relapse (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure2

Timeline of the clinical case presentation

Discussion

Gathering data, but also overcoming the social, cultural, diagnostic and therapeutic challenges involved a coordinated effort of public health officers, microbiologists, an interdisciplinary team of infectious disease’ practitioners and pediatricians, microbiologists, obstetricians, nurses, medical students and volunteers. We discuss challenges in the management of MDR-TB in a low incidence country and possible ways to overcome them.

Rapid diagnosis of TB and molecular typing of MTBC strains

Rapid and accurate diagnosis is essential to prevent inadequate treatment of MDR-TB. TB diagnosis is based on clinical, radiological and microbiological features. However, clinical features can be heterogeneous and are, especially in children, less specific ranging from weight loss, cough and fever to wheezing or lethargy, possibly delaying the diagnosis in low-burden settings. In recent years, genome-based characterization of MTBC strains became a powerful tool for prospective surveillance and prediction of antimicrobial susceptibilities. In the setting of population displacement, language barriers and fragmented information related to contacts, genotyping has been used to infer the likelihood of transmission between cases [9,10,11]. The advent of extensive genetic DST enables targeted and more individualized treatment regimens [15].

Genotypic drug sensitivity testing (DST) was only performed after referral to our clinic, leading to an ineffective standard TB-therapy of the first two patients for weeks. In our cases it revealed identical TB-strains in all culture-positive patients and-by revealing the complex resistance pattern- it also enabled us to find the index patient. Phenotypic and genotypic DST was concordant for all drugs tested (Table 1).

Laboratories need to implement standardized algorithms for TB diagnosis: nucleic acid amplification tests endorsed by the World Health Organisation should be performed on at least one sputum sample per patient being evaluated for MTBC strains. Rapid drug susceptibility tests should be more accessible in primary care hospitals to provide comprehensive and efficient care. In future, whole genome sequencing could be the tool to detect a broad spectrum of mutations with one analysis [10, 16].

Contact tracing and access to national healthcare systems for migrants with MDR-TB

Forced displacement, poor nutrition, the collapse of health service infrastructure, mental and physical stress are risk factors for refugees contracting infectious diseases, including TB [17]. In Germany, all asylum seekers above 16 (excluding pregnant women) undergo a compulsive TB screening via chest X-ray upon entering the country. The federal states organize reception and registration independently, including TB screening and documentation. Data transfer and storage was poorly standardized. Therefore good quality and reliable data concerning health monitoring of refugees and TB in particular in Germany are scarce [18].

As a result, only the adult male patients were screened for TB upon entering Germany. The X-rays were only available after intensive file studies and involving many health authorities but showed no signs of active TB upon entering Germany. No IGRA tests were performed.

Our patients couldn’t remember much about the first medical screening and trying to recapitulate their migration route and their displacements within Germany necessitated numerous interviews. Before immigration to Germany the adults and the 4-year old girl were residents of Sudan. The male patients had travelled to Germany via Russia and Estonia in 2014, the female patients – 2 adults and one child- had travelled via Egypt to Estonia by airplane. They reunited with the male patients and continued their route to Germany by bus (Fig. 3). Both infants were born in Germany approximately 3 months after arriving there. Before travelling to Germany in May 2017, the families had lived in two flats in Estonia with no contact to other refugees. None of the patients remembered contact to a coughing or ill person during this period. They only remembered having lived with an ill middle-aged person for a couple of days in one of the first German refugee camps. This person could be identified as a 50-year-old Georgian refugee who was diagnosed with cavernous pulmonary MDR-TB briefly after having lived with our patients and who was successfully treated in another hospital in northern Germany. Through genetic fingerprinting of MTBC we identified this patient as the index case.

Fig. 3
figure3

Travel routes of the cases (modified from VectorStock®, Expanded Licence ID 21681944, licensed to the corresponding author). Case 1, 4 and 5 travelled from Sudan via Egypt to Estonia (red line). Case 3 travelled from Sudan via Russia to Estonia (blue line). Cases 1, 3, 4 and 5 reunited in Estonia and further travelled to Germany (green line). Case 7 (index case) travelled from Georgia to Germany (orange line)

In Germany, access to health care services for asylum seekers is limited to emergencies, with exceptions being possible on a case-by-case basis, which leads to delays in the delivery of care [18, 19]. Consequently, access to long and expensive MDR-TB treatments for this population is poorly regulated. According to the Dublin Regulation, the first country of entry to the European Union is responsible for a person’s asylum claim. Five months after starting treatment of our first patients they faced the possibility of being sent to Estonia, the first European country they set foot on, putting the treatment continuation and therefore outcome in jeopardy. For this reason, although the patients were diagnosed with a life-threatening disease in one of the wealthiest countries in the world, there were serious uncertainties about whether the high therapy costs will be covered by the national health-care system.

Due to the national and international mobility of asylum seekers, a joint European solution of health information management would be desirable for the future.

Personalized treatment of patients with MDR-TB

Almost 50 years after the introduction of rifampicin, three new TB-antibiotics (bedaquiline, delamanid, pretonamid) were lanced and a number of older and repurposed drugs became increasingly important for the treatment of MDR-TB [2, 20,21,22,23,24,25]. As drug-susceptibility testing is complemented by genotypic methods offering rapid information on drug resistance patterns, individualized MDR-TB regimens can be designed more rapidly - an approach we also used. However, MDR-TB regimes are poorly tolerated, lengthy and expensive. Because of the adverse effects up to 90% of patients need regimen changes [2, 3, 26]. Our patients did not make an exception so we needed to adapt the treatment plans to the severe adverse effects, for example the severe polyneuropathy leading to discontinuation of linezolid in the adult patients or the high frequency hearing loss occurring in all patients treated with amikacin. All patients receiving an MDR-TB treatment should undergo systematic clinical and laboratory assessment to detect and allow rapid management of drug toxicity and adverse events [27, 28]. Standardized data should be systematically collected and reported to inform future policies on MDR-TB treatment strategies.

Aiming to provide family-centered care, we decided not to separate the children from their parents. Therefore, the first family was admitted to the adult infectious disease ward and the last two cases were treated on the pediatric ward. Infectious disease practitioners worked close with pediatricians and therapeutic decisions were always made in this interdisciplinary team.

Pediatric TB

Although it is estimated that up to 32.000 children develop MDR-TB every year, little is known about optimal treatment strategies [29, 30]. Diagnosing TB in children is more strenuous than in adults because of difficulties in collecting respiratory samples and because children often have paucibacillary (AFB smear- and culture-negative) disease [31]. Moreover, care for pediatric MDR-TB patients is hampered by a lack of child-friendly formulations for second-line therapeutic regimens. Secondly, children have a wide spectrum of TB manifestations and the clinical features are rarely straight-forward [29, 31]. Both infants (patient 2 and 6) had been seen by general practitioners and pediatricians due to recurrent airway distress and failure to thrive but were only diagnosed after months of delay. Therefore, even in low-burden settings TB should be considered in the differential diagnosis and molecular diagnosis of TB should be implemented early on.

TB and pregnancy

The immunological changes associated with pregnancy render pregnant women more vulnerable to TB [32, 33]. The unawareness of TB in Germany and the fear of X-ray studies during pregnancy delays the diagnosis and treatment in this population. We assume that both women were infected while being pregnant but were only diagnosed months afterwards.

Both young families were explained the need for contraception measures during the treatment, only one of the families opted for an intrauterine device. Five months into the isolation period of patient 5 we diagnosed an early pregnancy (gestation age 11 weeks). This raised additional ethical and pharmacological issues since we now needed to balance the possible teratogenic risks of the therapy against the risk of insufficient treatment. At this point patient 5 was treated with levofloxacin, bedaquilin, terizidone, clofazimine and PAS. There is little data on the safety and efficacy of these drugs during pregnancy and most data relating MDR-TB pregnant women were gathered from case reports and case series [34,35,36]. The expecting parents were counselled by gynecologists, infectious disease specialists, psychologists and pharmacologists and they decided not to interrupt the pregnancy; the treatment was also continued unchanged. After an uneventful pregnancy patient 5 gave birth at full term to a healthy child. Since the mother had been smear negative for months now, she and the newborn weren’t separated. The newborn didn’t receive any TB prophylaxis after birth and- respecting the parents’ wishes and their cultural background- it was breastfed.

TB management in pregnancy is a multidisciplinary approach. Moreover, family planning counselling should be an integral part of the therapy and follow-up strategies for TB patients of child-bearing age.

Language and cultural barriers

Language and cultural barriers hindered adherence and limited the quality of information provided to the patients, since it often lacked detail. Language barriers also diminished the accuracy in reporting side-effects and it was challenging to verify the patients’ understanding. Depression due to isolation also posed difficulties. The new pregnancy underscored the differences in therapeutic goals and disease understanding between medical personnel and patients: the young couple was explained the need for contraception measures during the treatment and-since they refused following medical advice- we didn’t approach the issue further.

We addressed all the above issues with the support of translators from bilingual colleagues and volunteers from the migrant community. Professional translators and available psychological support dealing with pre-migration trauma and post-resettlement stress among refugees would be desirable and would have probably improved adherence in our patients.

Conclusion

Tuberculosis control is a primary global health priority but the goal to eliminate TB is being threatened by the increase in incidence of MDR-TB cases [1, 23]. Travel and migration are phenomena as old as humankind and- since they have reached unprecedented levels in the past years – they are due to also speed up the geographical spread of multidrug resistant strains. This case series demonstrates the special challenges of MDR-TB in a low incidence country with a decentralized health care system. We are fortunate enough to experience times in which new TB-antibiotics were made available and in which molecular assays revolutionized TB-diagnostics. We need to take advantage of that, establish early molecular DST and develop personalized therapies for patients suffering from drug resistant TB. Hopefully, in the future access to routine next generation sequencing of specimens from every TB patient will enable us to improve a comprehensive surveillance, detect TB case clusters and trace transmission patterns faster and more efficiently. Furthermore, integrating prevention and relief strategies for the physical, psychological and social distress brought by TB is both medically and morally essential.

Availability of data and materials

Data will be made available by the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

TB:

Tuberculosis

MDR-TB:

Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis

MTBC:

Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex

INH:

Isoniazide

RMP:

Rifampicin

EMB:

Ethambutol

PZA:

Pyrazinamide

ETO:

Ethionamid

DST:

Drug susceptibility testing

AFB:

Acid-fast bacilli

IGRA:

Interferon-gamma release assay

PAS:

4-aminosalicylic acid

References

  1. 1.

    WHO. Global Tuberculosis Report 2018. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Lange C, Aarnoutse RE, Alffenaar JWC, Bothamley G, Brinkmann F, Costa J, et al. Management of patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2019;23(6):645–62.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Collaborative Group for the Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data in MDRTBt, Ahmad N, Ahuja SD, Akkerman OW, Alffenaar JC, Anderson LF, et al. Treatment correlates of successful outcomes in pulmonary multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Lancet. 2018;392(10150):821–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    O'Neill MB, Shockey A, Zarley A, Aylward W, Eldholm V, Kitchen A, et al. Lineage specific histories of mycobacterium tuberculosis dispersal in Africa and Eurasia. Mol Ecol. 2019;28:3241–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15120.

  5. 5.

    UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), Global Trends: Forced Displacement in 2018. 2019. Available at: https://www.unhcr.org/5d08d7ee7.pdf. Accessed 10 Sept 2019.

  6. 6.

    MacNeil A, Glaziou P, Sismanidis C, Maloney S, Floyd K. Global epidemiology of tuberculosis and Progress toward achieving global targets - 2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019;68(11):263–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Glasauer S, Altmann D, Hauer B, Brodhun B, Haas W, Perumal N. First-line tuberculosis drug resistance patterns and associated risk factors in Germany, 2008-2017. PLoS One. 2019;14(6):e0217597.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Gunther G, van Leth F, Alexandru S, Altet N, Avsar K, Bang D, et al. Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Europe, 2010-2011. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21(3):409–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Walker TM, Merker M, Knoblauch AM, Helbling P, Schoch OD, van der Werf MJ, et al. A cluster of multidrug-resistant mycobacterium tuberculosis among patients arriving in Europe from the horn of Africa: a molecular epidemiological study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(4):431–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Walker TM, Merker M, Kohl TA, Crook DW, Niemann S, Peto TE. Whole genome sequencing for M/XDR tuberculosis surveillance and for resistance testing. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017;23(3):161–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Lalor MK, Casali N, Walker TM, Anderson LF, Davidson JA, Ratna N, et al. The use of whole-genome sequencing in cluster investigation of a multidrug-resistant tuberculosis outbreak. Eur Respir J. 2018;51:1702313. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.02313-2017.

  12. 12.

    Organization GWH. Technical Report on critical concentrations for drug susceptibility testing of medicines used in the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis. 2018; (WHO/CDS/TB/2018.5).

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kohl TA, Utpatel C, Schleusener V, De Filippo MR, Beckert P, Cirillo DM, et al. MTBseq: a comprehensive pipeline for whole genome sequence analysis of mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolates. PeerJ. 2018;6:e5895.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Schaberg T, Bauer T, Brinkmann F, Diel R, Feiterna-Sperling C, Haas W, et al. Tuberculosis guideline for adults - guideline for diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis including LTBI testing and treatment of the German central committee (DZK) and the German respiratory society (DGP). Pneumologie. 2017;71(6):325–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Lange C, Alghamdi WA, Al-Shaer MH, Brighenti S, Diacon AH, DiNardo AR, et al. Perspectives for personalized therapy for patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. J Intern Med. 2018.

  16. 16.

    Consortium CR, the GP, Allix-Beguec C, Arandjelovic I, Bi L, Beckert P, et al. Prediction of susceptibility to first-line tuberculosis drugs by DNA sequencing. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(15):1403–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Dhavan P, Dias HM, Creswell J, Weil D. An overview of tuberculosis and migration. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2017;21(6):610–23.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Biddle L, Menold N, Bentner M, Nost S, Jahn R, Ziegler S, et al. Health monitoring among asylum seekers and refugees: a state-wide, cross-sectional, population-based study in Germany. Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2019;16:3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Bozorgmehr K, Wenner J, Razum O. Restricted access to health care for asylum-seekers: applying a human rights lens to the argument of resource constraints. Eur J Pub Health. 2017;27(4):592–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Lange C, Chesov D, Heyckendorf J. Clofazimine for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019;25(2):128–30.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    von Groote-Bidlingmaier F, Patientia R, Sanchez E, Balanag V Jr, Ticona E, Segura P, et al. Efficacy and safety of delamanid in combination with an optimised background regimen for treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group phase 3 trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2019;7(3):249–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Pym AS, Diacon AH, Tang SJ, Conradie F, Danilovits M, Chuchottaworn C, et al. Bedaquiline in the treatment of multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. Eur Respir J. 2016;47(2):564–74.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    WHO consolidated guidelines on drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment. WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee. Geneva. 2019.

  24. 24.

    Keam SJ. Pretomanid: first approval. Drugs. 2019;79(16):1797–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Tweed CD, Dawson R, Burger DA, Conradie A, Crook AM, Mendel CM, et al. Bedaquiline, moxifloxacin, pretomanid, and pyrazinamide during the first 8 weeks of treatment of patients with drug-susceptible or drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis: a multicentre, open-label, partially randomised, phase 2b trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2019;7(12):1048–58.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Lange C, Abubakar I, Alffenaar JW, Bothamley G, Caminero JA, Carvalho AC, et al. Management of patients with multidrug-resistant/extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in Europe: a TBNET consensus statement. Eur Respir J. 2014;44(1):23–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Borisov S, Danila E, Maryandyshev A, et al. Surveillance of adverse events in the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis: first global report. Eur Respir J. 2019;54(6):1901522. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01522-2019.

  28. 28.

    Campbell JR, Falzon D, Mirzayev F, et al. Improving Quality of Patient Data for Treatment of Multidrug- or Rifampin-Resistant Tuberculosis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26(3):e190997. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2603.190997.

  29. 29.

    Harausz EP, Garcia-Prats AJ, Law S, Schaaf HS, Kredo T, Seddon JA, et al. Treatment and outcomes in children with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2018;15(7):e1002591.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Jenkins HE, Yuen CM. The burden of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in children. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2018;22(5):3–6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Marais BJ, Gie RP, Schaaf HS, Hesseling AC, Obihara CC, Starke JJ, et al. The natural history of childhood intra-thoracic tuberculosis: a critical review of literature from the pre-chemotherapy era. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2004;8(4):392–402.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Kraus TA, Engel SM, Sperling RS, Kellerman L, Lo Y, Wallenstein S, et al. Characterizing the pregnancy immune phenotype: results of the viral immunity and pregnancy (VIP) study. J Clin Immunol. 2012;32(2):300–11.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Zenner D, Kruijshaar ME, Andrews N, Abubakar I. Risk of tuberculosis in pregnancy: a national, primary care-based cohort and self-controlled case series study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;185(7):779–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Drobac PC, del Castillo H, Sweetland A, Anca G, Joseph JK, Furin J, et al. Treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis during pregnancy: long-term follow-up of 6 children with intrauterine exposure to second-line agents. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40(11):1689–92.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Palacios E, Dallman R, Munoz M, Hurtado R, Chalco K, Guerra D, et al. Drug-resistant tuberculosis and pregnancy: treatment outcomes of 38 cases in Lima, Peru. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48(10):1413–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Shin S, Guerra D, Rich M, Seung KJ, Mukherjee J, Joseph K, et al. Treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis during pregnancy: a report of 7 cases. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;36(8):996–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Florian Maurer and Sönke Andres for the constructive critical discussions.

Funding

The authors have no funding source to disclose. Open access funding provided by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

OJ and TT were involved in patient care, searched the scientific literature, designed the figures, wrote the first manuscript draft and co-edited the manuscript. KS, NS, MS, UB were involved in patient care, co-wrote and edited the manuscript. LS was involved in the microbiological diagnosis, cultural and molecular drug resistance testing and edited the manuscript. BK offered advice on therapy design and on follow-up strategies and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oana Joean.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Epidemiologic patient data was collected as part of routine case notification and contact investigation according to German Federal Infection Protection Act (Infektionsschutzgesetz (IfSG), 01/2001). Clinical data were anonymised in accordance with the requirements of the German Federal Data Protection Act (Bundesdatenschutzgesetz (BDSG), 06/2017). The clinical characteristics presented were the routine clinical data collected in the course of treatment and follow-up. No additional tests or procedures were performed for the sole purpose of this study. Therefore, the Institutional Ethics Committee Approval was waived. The adult patients and the legal guardians of the pediatric patients gave written informed consent to the medical procedures used for routine treatment purposes.

Consent for publication

The adult patients and legal guardians of the pediatric patients gave written informed consent to the publication of this case series.

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1.

Semi-structured interview concerning the migration routes, diagnosis of TB and contact tracing.

Additional file 2.

Expanded license agreement and copy-right for Figure 3, modified from VectorStock® and licensed to the corresponding author.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Joean, O., Thiele, T., Schütz, K. et al. Multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a report of cosmopolitan microbial migration and an analysis of best management practices. BMC Infect Dis 20, 678 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-05381-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Tuberculosis
  • Molecular epidemiology
  • Case series