Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance-associated mutations in Mycoplasma genitalium in Johannesburg, South Africa, 2007–2014

BMC Infectious Diseases201919:148

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-3797-6

  • Received: 30 May 2018
  • Accepted: 8 February 2019
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Antimicrobial resistance in Mycoplasma genitalium is rising globally with resultant clinical treatment failure. We investigated the prevalence of mutations in the macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance-determining regions of M. genitalium in Johannesburg, South Africa, and ascertained their association with HIV serostatus.

Methods

Stored M. genitalium positive specimens, collected from STI and HIV patients enrolled in the Gauteng STI National Microbiological Surveillance programme (2007–2014) and a large HIV outpatient clinic-based study (2007) in Johannesburg, were tested for antimicrobial resistance.

Results

We determined the prevalence of 23S rRNA gene mutations conferring macrolide resistance and mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining regions (QRDR) of the gyrA and parC genes in 266 M. genitalium positive DNA extracts. No macrolide resistance-associated mutations were detected in any of the specimens analysed. QRDR mutations with known M. genitalium-associated fluoroquinolone resistance were not detected in gyrA, however, one specimen (0.4%) contained a D87Y amino acid alteration in parC, which has been linked to fluoroquinolone treatment failure. The most common parC amino acid change detected, of unknown clinical significance, was P62S (18.8%). We found no significant association between QRDR mutations in M. genitalium and HIV-infection.

Conclusions

Ongoing antimicrobial resistance surveillance in M. genitalium is essential, as macrolide resistance may emerge given the recent incorporation of azithromycin into the 2015 South African national STI syndromic management guidelines.

Keywords

  • Macrolide
  • Fluoroquinolone
  • Resistance-associated mutations
  • Mycoplasma genitalium
  • Johannesburg
  • South Africa

Background

Mycoplasma genitalium is a known cause of non-gonococcal urethritis (NGU) in men and cervicitis in women [1]. A recent meta-analysis revealed that M. genitalium infection in women is also associated with an increased risk of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), infertility, preterm delivery and spontaneous abortion [2]. Furthermore, M. genitalium infection is a possible cofactor for the acquisition and transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) [35]. The prevalence of M. genitalium infection ranges between 1.1 and 3.3% in the general population and can be as high as 35% among men with symptomatic non-chlamydial NGU [1, 6]. Asymptomatic M. genitalium infections are common among women and often remain undiagnosed [7].

The current STI Management Guidelines (2015) for South Africa include the use of 1 g azithromycin (a macrolide), orally, as a single dose for the treatment of male urethritis syndrome (MUS) and vaginal discharge syndrome (VDS) [8]. The European NGU management guidelines recommend the use of an extended 5-day azithromycin regimen (500 mg on the first day and 250 mg for the next four days) for dual treatment of M. genitalium and Chlamydia trachomatis infections [9]. The widespread use of azithromycin has led to the emergence of macrolide resistance in some settings [1012]. A rapid decline in azithromycin efficacy, from 85% in 2009 to 61% in recent years has been documented in the Asia-Pacific region [10, 13, 14]. Resistance is mediated by nucleotide substitutions at positions A2058 and A2059 (Escherichia coli numbering) in the V region of the 23S rRNA gene of M. genitalium [15]. Mutations in the L4 and L22 ribosomal protein genes conferring macrolide resistance have been described in other mollicutes but these mutations seem to be associated with low-grade resistance [16]. Moxifloxacin, a fluoroquinolone, is often recommended as a second-line treatment in cases of azithromycin treatment failure; however, reports of moxifoxacin treatment failure, have been described, especially in the Asia-Pacific region, and are associated with point mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining region (QRDR) of the DNA gyrase (gyrA) and the topoisomerase IV (parC) genes [10, 1721]. In our setting, HIV-infected individuals, in particular, may have increased exposure to fluoroquinolones used in the treatment of acute gastroenteritis and non-typhoidal salmonella infections and macrolides for the treatment of severe pneumonia [2225]. The isolation of M. genitalium in cell culture remains problematic and therefore in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing of M. genitalium strains is rarely performed [26]. The genetic characterisation of M. genitalium strains from South Africa is important for studies of antimicrobial resistance, which in turn enables the development of effective treatment algorithms for syndromic management of patients with genital discharge.

We evaluated the prevalence of macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance in stored M. genitalium positive specimens at the National Institute for Communicable Diseases (NICD), South Africa. We sequenced the region V of the 23S rRNA gene and QRDRs of the gyrA and parC genes in M. genitalium positive specimens obtained from Gauteng STI National Microbiological Surveillance (NMS) (2007–2014), as well as in M. genitalium positive specimens obtained from HIV positive patients previously recruited to an urban HIV outpatient clinic in Johannesburg, South Africa (2007). Additionally, we sought to determine the association between HIV serostatus and the presence of mutations in the antimicrobial resistance-determining regions of M. genitalium.

Methods

Study population and specimens

The STI Section of the Centre for HIV & STI (CHIVSTI) at the NICD, Johannesburg, has conducted annual STI National Microbiological Surveillance (NMS) surveys among STI patients (male and female patients aged 18 or older) attending the Alexandra Health Centre in Gauteng, South Africa, since 2007. This facility is a community-based primary healthcare centre offering HIV, AIDS, STI and TB-related treatment, care and support services and is situated in the most populous province in South Africa. Clinical and microbiological data were linked using survey numbers and delinked from patient identifiers. Genomic DNA was initially extracted from urine (men) and endocervical swabs (women) using an automated DNA extractor (X-tractor Gene and QIAxtractor platforms, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Extracted DNA specimens were tested for Neisseria gonorrhoeae, C. trachomatis, Trichomonas vaginalis and M. genitalium using a validated in-house multiplex real-time PCR assay on the Rotor-Gene platform (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) [27]. A total of 458/4731(9.7%) of Gauteng NMS specimens analysed during 2007–2014 tested positive for M. genitalium DNA, of which 222/2509 (8.8%) were from males and 236/2222 (10.6%) from females. These 458 M. genitalium positive DNA specimens were stored at -70 °C at the STI Section, CHIVSTI and were used for the study. Additional stored M. genitalium DNA specimens, obtained from a previous study that determined the burden of asymptomatic STIs among people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) at an urban HIV outpatient clinic in Johannesburg, were also included in this study [28]. The presence of M. genitalium DNA in these specimens was determined using the same methodology described above. A total of 68/1108 (6.1%) of PLWHA specimens also tested positive for M. genitalium DNA; these positive DNA extracts were stored at -70 °C at the STI Section, CHIVSTI and used in this analysis. The total number of M. genitalium-positive specimens that were available for this study is depicted in Table 1. All 526 frozen stored M. genitalium DNA extracts were re-tested to confirm the presence of M. genitalium DNA using a validated, commercially available Sacace M. genitalium Real-TM PCR assay (Sacace Biotechnologies, Como, Italy), according to manufacturer’s instructions. The HIV serostatus of each de-identified NMS participant was determined as part of the main NMS study protocol.
Table 1

Overall M. genitalium prevalence and number of M. genitalium positive specimens after confirmation testing (2007–2014)

Year

Study*

Males

Females

N

M. genitalium prevalence

M. genitalium used in this study after confirmation

N

M. genitalium prevalence

M. genitalium used in this study after confirmation

n

%#

n

%§

n

%#

n

%§

2007

NMS

205

31

15.1

2

6.5

200

23

11.5

1

4.3

2007

PLWHA

550

39

7.1

16

41.0

558

29

5.2

8

27.6

2008

NMS

433

37

8.5

14

37.8

312

32

10.3

13

40.6

2009

NMS

499

45

9.0

13

28.9

492

40

8.1

7

17.5

2010

NMS

427

38

8.9

27

71.1

393

51

13.0

36

70.6

2011

NMS

261

21

8.0

16

76.2

220

19

6.4

15

78.9

2012

NMS

198

16

8.1

15

93.8

207

20

9.7

16

80.0

2013

NMS

280

23

8.2

13

56.5

199

27

13.6

25

92.6

2014

NMS

206

11

5.3

10

90.9

199

24

12.1

19

79.2

Total

Total

3059

261

8.5

126

48.3

2780

265

9.5

140

52.8

* NMS National Microbiological Surveillance study (symptomatic patients), PLWHA People living with HIV/AIDS study (asymptomatic patients)

# Percentage of genital discharge specimens that initially tested positive for M. genitalium

§ Percentage of stored DNA specimens that tested M. genitalium positive after confirmatory testing in this study

Detection of mutations in the 23S rRNA gene conferring macrolide resistance and characterization of the quinolone-resistance determining regions of the gyrA and parC genes of Mycoplasma genitalium

Macrolide resistance mediating mutations in region V of the 23S rRNA-gene were detected by DNA sequencing of amplicons obtained from the M. genitalium positive specimens. Published primers targeting a unique 147 bp region of the M. genitalium 23S rRNA gene flanking the mutations found in region V of the 23S rRNA gene were used [15]. Fluoroquinolone resistance testing was conducted based on the methodology described by Shimada et al. (2010) [29]. Mutations in the region corresponding to the QRDR of the E. coli DNA gyrase genes (gyrA) and the topoisomerase IV (parC) genes in M. genitalium were analysed. PCR primers for the amplification of the gyrA and parC genes have been published previously [29]. The PCR assays were performed in a GeneAmp 9700 thermocycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). To visualize PCR products, 1 μl of PCR products, including the 1000 bp marker were analyzed on an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The PCR products were purified using the MSB® Spin PCRapace kit (Invitek, Berlin, Germany). After purification of the PCR products, sequencing reactions were performed in both directions using the same primers as previously described [15, 29]. Cycle sequencing was performed using the ABI Prism Big Dye terminator reaction kit v. 3.1 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and sequences were analysed on a 16-capillary ABI 3130xl system (Applied Biosystems).

Data analyses

Contigs obtained from initial sequencing were assembled using Sequencher software version 5.4.6 (Gene Codes Corp, MI, USA) and the FASTA sequences obtained were aligned with reference sequences using MEGA version 7.0.20 [30]. A chi-square test was used to determine associations between HIV serostatus and mutations in the target genes with the level of significance set at p = 0.05.

Results

A total of 266/526 (50.6%) stored DNA specimens were confirmed as M. genitalium positive using the Sacace M. genitalium Real-TM PCR assay (Table 1). These DNA specimens were obtained from 126 men and 140 women. The median age of all 266 participants was 27 years (IQR 24–32) [males: 28 years (IQR 24–33); females: 26 years (IQR 23–31)]. A significant difference in HIV serostatus was observed between males (57/126 HIV-infected; 45.2%) and females (90/140 HIV-infected; 64.3%) (p = 0.002) in the M. genitalium-infected cohort analysed.

Macrolide resistance-associated mutations (A2058G/A2059G) were not detected in any of the specimens analysed. Mutations in the QRDR of the gyrA and parC genes were detected in 9/266 (3.4%) and 54/266 (20.3%) specimens, respectively (Table 2), with no significant differences observed between males and females (gyrA: p = 0.88; parC: p = 0.62). HIV serostatus was not associated with the presence or absence of mutations in either gyrA (p = 0.99) or parC (p = 0.51).
Table 2

Fluoroquinolone resistance-associated mutations and corresponding amino acid changes in Mycoplasma genitalium, Gauteng Province, South Africa

Gene

Mutation/s

Amino acid change/s

No. of samples (n = 266)

Frequency (%)

Associated with clinically-relevant antimicrobial resistance

Yes/No/ Unknown

Reference

gyrA

G207A

M69I

2

0.8

Unknown

N/A

G231A

No change

1

0.4

N/A

N/A

A288G

No change

2

0.8

N/A

N/A

A318G

No change

1

0.4

N/A

N/A

C321T

No change

1

0.4

N/A

N/A

T348C

No change

1

0.4

N/A

N/A

A353G

H118R

1

0.4

Unknown

N/A

parC

C234T

No change

1

0.4

N/A

N/A

G259 T

D87Y

1

0.4

Yes

[29, 35, 50, 52]

G291A

No change

1

0.4

N/A

N/A

A338G

D113G

1

0.4

Unknown

N/A

C184T + C234T

P62S

50

18.8

Unknown

[35, 46, 54]

C184T + C234T + A338G

P62S + D113G

1

0.4

Unknown

N/A

N/A Not applicable

QRDR gyrA mutations comprised two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) resulting in altered amino acids at positions 69 (M69I) and 118 (H118R). The clinical relevance of these SNPs is unknown. The M69I alteration was detected in two specimens (2/266; 0.8%) sampled in 2013 while the H118R alteration occurred only once (1/266; 0.4%) in a sample collected in 2007. An additional six specimens contained single synonymous substitutions at nucleotide positions 231 (G231A), 288 (A288G), 318 (A318G), 321 (C321T) and 348 (T348C), resulting in no amino acid changes.

Mutations in the QRDR of parC were more frequently observed and included amino acid alterations at positions 62 (P62S), 87 (D87Y) and 113 (D113G) (Table 2). The clinically significant D87Y alteration in ParC was observed only once in 2013 (1/266; 0.4%). The P62S was the most common alteration observed in ParC (50/266; 18.8%) and was always accompanied by a synonymous substitution at nucleotide position 234 (C234T). The P62S (C184T)/C234T combination was observed in each year of the survey (2007–2014). In one specimen collected in 2010, the P62S alteration (+C234T nucleotide substitution) was observed in combination with another amino acid alteration at position 113 (D113G) of ParC. One additional synonymous parC nucleotide substitution, G291A, was observed in a single specimen collected in 2012.

Discussion

We report the baseline prevalence rates of macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance-associated mutations in M. genitalium among symptomatic and asymptomatic patients in Johannesburg, South Africa (2007–2014). No macrolide resistance-associated mutations were found in the 23S rRNA genes of M. genitalium analysed in this study, and only one specimen (0.4%) contained a known fluoroquinolone resistance-associated mutation (G259 T) in the parC gene resulting in amino acid change D87Y.

M. genitalium is a known cause of non-gonococcal urethritis (NGU) worldwide but syndromic management of NGU is mainly focused on the successful treatment of C. trachomatis infections. Three antimicrobial classes, namely tetracyclines, macrolides and fluoroquinolones, have shown antimicrobial activity against mycoplasmas. In South Africa, prior to 2008, ciprofloxacin and doxycycline were the recommended syndromic treatment options for patients presenting with genital discharge syndromes but due to the rapid emergence of fluoroquinolone-resistant N. gonorrhoeae in the country, the treatment regimen was changed in 2008 to single-dose cefixime and doxycycline [27]. Doxycycline is very effective in clearing C. trachomatis infections but has a low eradication rate for M. genitalium infection. Given concerns over the subsequent emergence of cefixime-resistant N. gonorrhoeae isolates in South Africa, and in the face of already high-level tetracycline resistance among gonococci, the treatment guidelines were once again changed in 2015. A key change was to replace doxycycline with azithromycin, a potent macrolide with a long half-life and good tissue penetration [12, 31]. Single dose azithromycin (1 g) is an attractive treatment option for STI patients with C. trachomatis and, although not ideal, may also treat co-existing M. genitalium infections. Azithromycin has now been adopted in many countries as the first line treatment option for NGU [32]. The additional impact of azithromycin as a component of a dual treatment regimen for gonorrhoea makes this drug a rational choice for the syndromic management of male urethritis syndrome (MUS) and vaginal discharge syndrome (VDS) [33].

An increase in the prevalence of macrolide resistant M. genitalium strains has been reported in many parts of the world, signifying a strong association between the presence of specific mutations in the 23S rRNA gene of M. genitalium and macrolide treatment failure [15, 3437]. It is now widely accepted that a 1 g single dose of azithromycin may be more likely to select for macrolide resistance as compared to extended azithromycin treatment (500 mg on day 1, 250 mg daily on days 2–5) although macrolide resistant M. genitalium infections are unlikely to respond to either regimen [38, 39]. The widespread use of 1 g azithromycin in countries such as Australia, Canada, Greenland, the United Kingdom and Japan has caused rapid selection of resistant mutants, resulting in the detection of macrolide resistance-associated mutations in 31–100% of M. genitalium analysed [36, 4043]. The rise in macrolide-resistant M. genitalium infections has heralded calls to use an extended azithromycin regimen or revert to doxycycline as first-line treatment of NGU. Moxifloxacin is recommended in settings where macrolide resistance is already well established [32].

Limited information is available on the prevalence of macrolide resistance-associated mutations in South Africa with only two studies reporting prevalence rates of mutations in the 23S rRNA gene of M. genitalium [44, 45]. The first study showed a 9.8% prevalence of the A2058G 23S rRNA mutation in 41 M. genitalium-positive specimens collected between 2011 and 2012 in the Mopani District, Limpopo Province [45]. These remnant specimens were obtained from sexually active females aged 18–49 years who attended primary health care clinics and participated in a cross-sectional study of vaginal, rectal and oral gonococcal and chlamydial infections [45]. The second study investigated macrolide resistance-associated mutations in the 23S rRNA genes of M. genitalium detected in females attending a pregnancy termination clinic at the George Mukhari Academic Hospital in Pretoria in 2012 and 2016 [44]. No macrolide resistance-associated mutations were detected in the 2012 specimens but 2/8 (25.0%) of the M. genitalium-positive 2016 specimens contained the A2059G 23S rRNA mutation [44]. Macrolide resistance-associated mutations were not detected in any of the M. genitalium-positive specimens analysed in our study but could emerge due to the recent incorporation of azithromycin into the 2015 South African national STI treatment guidelines.

Fluoroquinolones are often recommended as a second-line treatment option for M. genitalium infection but vary in terms of efficacy and in vitro activity against the organism [46]. Fluoroquinolones that are highly active against M. genitalium include moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, sitafloxacin and some of the newer fluoroquinolones, while ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin and levofloxacin are less efficacious for the treatment of M. genitalium infections [17, 47, 48]. Moxifloxacin is the treatment of choice for macrolide-resistant M. genitalium infections. However, recent reports of moxifloxacin treatment failure with reduced cure rates of macrolide-resistant M. genitalium infections in the Asia-Pacific region have emerged; these are all linked to the presence of fluoroquinolone resistance-associated mutations in gyrA and parC [20]. A number of these resistance-associated mutations in gyrA and parC have been described [35, 46, 4951]. Our findings mirror those from other published studies, whereby the frequency of mutations observed in parC was higher than in gyrA (19.5% v 1.1%) [35, 46, 49, 50]. Only two amino acid alterations were detected in GyrA (M69I in 2 specimens and H118R in one specimen) but none of these alterations have previously been associated with fluoroquinolone resistance.

The most commonly reported amino acid alterations associated with fluoroquinolone resistance are found at positions 83 and 87 of ParC (corresponding to positions 80 and 84 in E. coli) [35, 46, 4951]. The amino acid change D87Y in ParC has been described in specimens from Japan, France, Russia, Estonia and Australia and was found in only one specimen from this study [35, 4952]. The newly described D113G alteration in ParC was detected in one specimen but it is not known if this alteration contributes to fluoroquinolone resistance. The most prevalent amino acid alteration in ParC from this study was P62S (18.8%). The P62S ParC alteration, caused by the missense mutation C184T, has been described previously in a whole genome sequenced M. genitalium strain (M6282) that originated from a male with non-chlamydial NGU in Miyazaki, Japan [53]. The M6282 strain contained both the C184T missense mutation as well as a synonymous C234T mutation the QRDR of parC, however this strain has demonstrated in vitro phenotypic susceptibility to fluoroquinolones [15]. The P62S alteration was detected in 9.3% of M. genitalium-positive individuals in Melbourne, Australia and in 14.8% of M. genitalium-positive men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM) in Alabama, USA [46, 54]. The location of the P62S alteration in the QRDR of parC indicates that it may play a role in the evolution of fluoroquinolone resistance but current evidence suggests it does not confer phenotypic resistance [15]. STI patients in Johannesburg could have been exposed to circulating fluoroquinolone resistant M. genitalium strains in the community, and this could explain the presence of QRDR mutations observed in M. genitalium from this study. They may also have been exposed to quinolones used as treatment for other indications such as urinary tract infections. Moxifloxacin is currently one of five second-line drugs used to treat multi-drug resistant Mycobacterium turberculosis (TB) in South Africa, but due to concerns of widespread unrestricted use in primary healthcare centres and consequently the development of moxifloxacin resistance in TB, it is unlikely to be included in future national STI treatment guidelines.

Limitations of the study included the inability to determine the association between the presence of amino acid alterations in the QRDR of gyrA and parC detected in this study and patient treatment outcomes. Patients presenting with genital discharge at primary health care clinics in South Africa are treated syndromically and they might not return to the same clinic for follow-up assessment and treatment if initial treatment failed to cure their infection. Antimicrobial susceptibility assays for M. genitalium are also rarely performed due to the technical difficulties in culturing M. genitalium from clinical specimens, and therefore attempts to associate phenotypic resistance with genotypic findings are lacking [26]. Another limitation was the inability to confirm all M. genitalium-positive specimens that were stored at -70 °C. Unsuccessful amplifications were mostly observed in older specimens and may have been due to DNA degradation during storage or due to low bacterial loads of M. genitalium in these specimens. Carlson and Jensen (2010) demonstrated that freezing of M. genitalium-positive clinical specimens, as well as extracted DNA, leads to a significantly lower M. genitalium DNA load and a decreased sensitivity to that obtained by testing fresh specimens, especially in those with an initial low DNA load [55]. Finally, the samples tested came from one city in South Africa and may not be geographically representative at national level.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we report the absence of macrolide resistance-associated mutations in M. genitalium-positive patients presenting with urogenital discharge to the Alexandra Health Centre between 2007 and 2014 and among asymptomatic M. genitalium-positive, HIV-positive individuals attending an urban HIV outpatient clinic in Johannesburg in 2007. The low number of known fluoroquinolone resistance-associated mutations observed in the QRDR of M. genitalium in this study could strengthen the case for reverting to this class of antibiotic if macrolide resistance become widespread in South Africa. However, resistance to macrolides could emerge due to the incorporation of azithromycin in the 2015 South African national STI treatment guidelines. Countries with high-level macrolide resistance in M. genitalium could implement rapid M. genitalium and macrolide resistance testing at point-of-care, using commercial assays such as the SpeeDX Resistance Plus™ MG test to facilitate appropriate targeted treatment [56]. Ongoing surveillance of macrolide resistance-associated mutations in M. genitalium positive cases is warranted and will be performed in our setting to support the continued use of azithromycin, which is included in the current national STI syndromic management guidelines.

Abbreviations

AIDS: 

Acquired immune deficiency syndrome

bp: 

Base pair

CHIVSTI: 

Centre for HIV and Sexually Transmitted Infections

DNA: 

Deoxyribonucleic acid

HIV: 

Human immunodeficiency virus

IQR: 

Interquartile range

MSM: 

Men-who-have-sex-with-men

MUS: 

Male urethritis syndrome

NGU: 

Non-gonococcal urethritis

NICD: 

National Institute for Communicable Diseases

NMS: 

National Microbiological Surveillance

PCR: 

Polymerase chain reaction

PID: 

Pelvic inflammatory disease

PLWHA: 

People living with HIV/AIDS

QRDR: 

Quinolone resistance-determining region

rRNA: 

Ribosomal ribonucleic acid

STI: 

Sexually transmitted infection

TB: 

Mycobacterium tuberculosis

VDS: 

Vaginal discharge syndrome

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the clinical staff (Alex Vezi and Valencia Kekana) at the Alexandra Health Centre and STI Section staff at NICD for their assistance during this study. Special thanks go to Associate Professor Cynthia Firnhaber who provided additional specimens for analyses from an urban HIV outpatient clinic in Johannesburg.

Funding

This study was internally funded by the National Institute for Communicable Diseases (NICD), a division of the National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS), South Africa. The funding body had no role in the design of this study, including sample collection, analysis, interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on request.

Authors’ contributions

EM and DL performed the study concept and design. EM and MM conducted the molecular testing and data analyses. EM drafted the manuscript and MM, DL and RK reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics clearance for this study was obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committee (Medical) of the University of the Witwatersrand [Clearance no. M150528]. All study participants provided written consent for their specimens to be used for future research.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Sexually Transmitted Infections Section, Centre for HIV and Sexually Transmitted Infections, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa
(2)
Western Sydney Sexual Health Centre, Western Sydney Local Health District, Parramatta, Australia
(3)
Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity and Sydney Medical School-Westmead, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
(4)
Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

References

  1. Taylor-Robinson D, Jensen JS. Mycoplasma genitalium: from Chrysalis to multicolored butterfly. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2011;24(3):498–514.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Lis R, Rowhani-Rahbar A, Manhart LE. Mycoplasma genitalium infection and female reproductive tract disease: a meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61(3):418–26.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Mavedzenge SN, Van Der Pol B, Weiss HA, Kwok C, Mambo F, Chipato T, et al. The association between mycoplasma genitalium and HIV-1 acquisition in African women. AIDS. 2012;26(5):617–24.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Vandepitte J, Weiss HA, Kyakuwa N, Nakubulwa S, Muller E, Buve A, et al. Natural history of mycoplasma genitalium infection in a cohort of female sex workers in Kampala, Uganda. Sex Transm Dis. 2013;40(5):422–7.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Vandepitte J, Weiss HA, Bukenya J, Kyakuwa N, Muller E, Buve A, et al. Association between mycoplasma genitalium infection and HIV acquisition among female sex workers in Uganda: evidence from a nested case-control study. Sex Transm Infect. 2014;90(7):545–9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Andersen B, Sokolowski I, Ostergaard L, Kjolseth Moller J, Olesen F, Jensen JS. Mycoplasma genitalium: prevalence and behavioural risk factors in the general population. Sex Transm Infect. 2007;83(3):237–41.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Jensen JS, Cusini M, Gomberg M, Moi H. 2016 European guideline on mycoplasma genitalium infections. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016;30(10):1650–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Sexually Transmitted Infections Management Guidelines 2015 [Cited 24 January 2018]. Adapted from: Standard Treatment Guidelines and Essential Drugs List PHC [Available from: http://www.nicd.ac.za/index.php/sexually-transmitted-infections-stis/].
  9. Shahmanesh M, Moi H, Lassau F, Janier M. Iusti/who. 2009 European guideline on the management of male non-gonococcal urethritis. Int J STD AIDS. 2009;20(7):458–64.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Bissessor M, Tabrizi SN, Twin J, Abdo H, Fairley CK, Chen MY, et al. Macrolide resistance and azithromycin failure in a mycoplasma genitalium-infected cohort and response of azithromycin failures to alternative antibiotic regimens. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60(8):1228–36.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Manhart LE, Broad JM, Golden MR. Mycoplasma genitalium: should we treat and how? Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53(Suppl 3):S129–42.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Manhart LE, Gillespie CW, Lowens MS, Khosropour CM, Colombara DV, Golden MR, et al. Standard treatment regimens for nongonococcal urethritis have similar but declining cure rates: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56(7):934–42.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Lau A, Bradshaw CS, Lewis D, Fairley CK, Chen MY, Kong FY, et al. The efficacy of azithromycin for the treatment of genital mycoplasma genitalium: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61(9):1389–99.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Deguchi T, Kikuchi M, Yasuda M, Ito S. Multidrug-resistant mycoplasma genitalium is increasing. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62(3):405–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Jensen JS, Bradshaw CS, Tabrizi SN, Fairley CK, Hamasuna R. Azithromycin treatment failure in mycoplasma genitalium-positive patients with nongonococcal urethritis is associated with induced macrolide resistance. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47(12):1546–53.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Pereyre S, Guyot C, Renaudin H, Charron A, Bebear C, Bebear CM. In vitro selection and characterization of resistance to macrolides and related antibiotics in mycoplasma pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48(2):460–5.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Jernberg E, Moghaddam A, Moi H. Azithromycin and moxifloxacin for microbiological cure of mycoplasma genitalium infection: an open study. Int J STD AIDS. 2008;19(10):676–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Gruson D, Pereyre S, Renaudin H, Charron A, Bebear C, Bebear CM. In vitro development of resistance to six and four fluoroquinolones in mycoplasma pneumoniae and mycoplasma hominis, respectively. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49(3):1190–3.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Vila J, Ruiz J, Goni P, De Anta MT. Detection of mutations in parC in quinolone-resistant clinical isolates of Escherichia coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40(2):491–3.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Couldwell DL, Tagg KA, Jeoffreys NJ, Gilbert GL. Failure of moxifloxacin treatment in mycoplasma genitalium infections due to macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance. Int J STD AIDS. 2013;24(10):822–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Terada M, Izumi K, Ohki E, Yamagishi Y, Mikamo H. Antimicrobial efficacies of several antibiotics against uterine cervicitis caused by mycoplasma genitalium. J Infect Chemother. 2012;18(3):313–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Kudsk-Iversen S, Gilbert JP, Azarath A. Management of patients presenting with diarrhoea to a regional emergency department in KwaZulu-Natal: call for clearer, more relevant guidance. SAJHIVMED. 2014;15:102–3.Google Scholar
  23. Keddy KH, Musekiwa A, Sooka A, Karstaedt A, Nana T, Seetharam S, et al. Clinical and microbiological features of invasive nontyphoidal Salmonella associated with HIV-infected patients, Gauteng Province, South Africa. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(13):e6448.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Uche IV, MacLennan CA, Saul A. A systematic review of the incidence, risk factors and case fatality rates of invasive Nontyphoidal Salmonella (iNTS) disease in Africa (1966 to 2014). PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11(1):e0005118.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Boyles TH, Brink A, Calligaro GL, Cohen C, Dheda K, Maartens G, et al. South African guideline for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9(6):1469–502.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Mondeja BA, Rodriguez NM, Barroto B, Blanco O, Jensen JS. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of recent Cuban mycoplasma genitalium isolates determined by a modified cell-culture-based method. PLoS One. 2016;11(9):e0162924.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Mhlongo S, Magooa P, Muller EE, Nel N, Radebe F, Wasserman E, et al. Etiology and STI/HIV coinfections among patients with urethral and vaginal discharge syndromes in South Africa. Sex Transm Dis. 2010;37(9):566–70.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Lewis DA, Chirwa TF, Msimang VM, Radebe FM, Kamb ML, Firnhaber CS. Urethritis/cervicitis pathogen prevalence and associated risk factors among asymptomatic HIV-infected patients in South Africa. Sex Transm Dis. 2012;39(7):531–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Shimada Y, Deguchi T, Nakane K, Masue T, Yasuda M, Yokoi S, et al. Emergence of clinical strains of mycoplasma genitalium harbouring alterations in ParC associated with fluoroquinolone resistance. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010;36(3):255–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 2016;33(7):1870–4.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Couldwell DL, Lewis DA. Mycoplasma genitalium infection: current treatment options, therapeutic failure, and resistance-associated mutations. Infect Drug Resist. 2015;8:147–61.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Jensen JS, Bradshaw C. Management of Mycoplasma genitalium infections - can we hit a moving target? BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15:343.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Bignell C, Garley J. Azithromycin in the treatment of infection with Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Sex Transm Infect. 2010;86(6):422–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Ito S, Shimada Y, Yamaguchi Y, Yasuda M, Yokoi S, Ito S, et al. Selection of mycoplasma genitalium strains harbouring macrolide resistance-associated 23S rRNA mutations by treatment with a single 1 g dose of azithromycin. Sex Transm Infect. 2011;87(5):412–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Tagg KA, Jeoffreys NJ, Couldwell DL, Donald JA, Gilbert GL. Fluoroquinolone and macrolide resistance-associated mutations in mycoplasma genitalium. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51(7):2245–9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Pond MJ, Nori AV, Witney AA, Lopeman RC, Butcher PD, Sadiq ST. High prevalence of antibiotic-resistant mycoplasma genitalium in nongonococcal urethritis: the need for routine testing and the inadequacy of current treatment options. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58(5):631–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Nijhuis RH, Severs TT, Van der Vegt DS, Van Zwet AA, Kusters JG. High levels of macrolide resistance-associated mutations in mycoplasma genitalium warrant antibiotic susceptibility-guided treatment. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015;70(9):2515–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Horner P, Blee K, Adams E. Time to manage mycoplasma genitalium as an STI: but not with azithromycin 1 g! Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2014;27(1):68–74.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Bjornelius E, Anagrius C, Bojs G, Carlberg H, Johannisson G, Johansson E, et al. Antibiotic treatment of symptomatic mycoplasma genitalium infection in Scandinavia: a controlled clinical trial. Sex Transm Infect. 2008;84(1):72–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Twin J, Jensen JS, Bradshaw CS, Garland SM, Fairley CK, Min LY, et al. Transmission and selection of macrolide resistant mycoplasma genitalium infections detected by rapid high resolution melt analysis. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35593.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Kikuchi M, Ito S, Yasuda M, Tsuchiya T, Hatazaki K, Takanashi M, et al. Remarkable increase in fluoroquinolone-resistant mycoplasma genitalium in Japan. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69(9):2376–82.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Gesink D, Racey CS, Seah C, Zittermann S, Mitterni L, Juzkiw J, et al. Mycoplasma genitalium in Toronto, Ont: estimates of prevalence and macrolide resistance. Can Fam Physician. 2016;62(2):e96–101.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Gesink DC, Mulvad G, Montgomery-Andersen R, Poppel U, Montgomery-Andersen S, Binzer A, et al. Mycoplasma genitalium presence, resistance and epidemiology in Greenland. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2012;71:1–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Le Roux M, Mafunise M, de Villiers B, Ditsele R. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Mycoplasma genitalium isolates from Pretoria, South Africa in 2012 and 2016. South Afr J Infect Dis 2017,4(1):1–4.Google Scholar
  45. Hay B, Dubbink JH, Ouburg S, Le Roy C, Pereyre S, van der Eem L, et al. Prevalence and macrolide resistance of mycoplasma genitalium in south African women. Sex Transm Dis. 2015;42(3):140–2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Murray GL, Bradshaw CS, Bissessor M, Danielewski J, Garland SM, Jensen JS, et al. Increasing macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance in mycoplasma genitalium. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23(5):809–12.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Deguchi T, Ito S, Hagiwara N, Yasuda M, Maeda S. Antimicrobial chemotherapy of mycoplasma genitalium-positive non-gonococcal urethritis. Expert Rev Anti-Infect Ther. 2012;10(7):791–803.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Yasuda M, Maeda S, Deguchi T. In vitro activity of fluoroquinolones against mycoplasma genitalium and their bacteriological efficacy for treatment of M. Genitalium-positive nongonococcal urethritis in men. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41(9):1357–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Deguchi T, Yasuda M, Horie K, Seike K, Kikuchi M, Mizutani K, et al. Drug resistance-associated mutations in mycoplasma genitalium in female sex workers, Japan. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21(6):1062–4.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Le Roy C, Henin N, Pereyre S, Bebear C. Fluoroquinolone-resistant mycoplasma genitalium, southwestern France. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22(9):1677–9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Shipitsyna E, Rumyantseva T, Golparian D, Khayrullina G, Lagos AC, Edelstein I, et al. Prevalence of macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance-mediating mutations in mycoplasma genitalium in five cities in Russia and Estonia. PLoS One. 2017;12(4):e0175763.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Deguchi T, Maeda S, Tamaki M, Yoshida T, Ishiko H, Ito M, et al. Analysis of the gyrA and parC genes of mycoplasma genitalium detected in first-pass urine of men with non-gonococcal urethritis before and after fluoroquinolone treatment. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2001;48(5):742–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. McGowin CL, Ma L, Jensen JS, Mancuso MM, Hamasuna R, Adegboye D, et al. Draft genome sequences of four axenic mycoplasma genitalium strains isolated from Denmark, Japan, and Australia. J Bacteriol. 2012;194(21):6010–1.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Dionne-Odom J, Geisler WM, Aaron KJ, Waites KB, Westfall AO, Van Der Pol B, et al. High prevalence of multidrug-resistant mycoplasma genitalium in human immunodeficiency virus-infected men who have sex with men in Alabama. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66(5):796–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Carlsen KH, Jensen JS. Mycoplasma genitalium PCR: does freezing of specimens affect sensitivity? J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48(10):3624–7.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Tabrizi SN, Su J, Bradshaw CS, Fairley CK, Walker S, Tan LY, et al. Prospective evaluation of ResistancePlus MG, a new multiplex quantitative PCR assay for detection of mycoplasma genitalium and macrolide resistance. J Clin Microbiol. 2017;55(6):1915–9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2019

Advertisement