Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Comparative study of virulence factors among methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates

BMC Infectious Diseases volume 18, Article number: 560 (2018) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is recognized worldwide as a leading cause of hospital and community infections. Biofilm formation by MRSA is an extremely important virulence factor to be understood. Our aim was to establish phenotypic and genotypic characterization of virulence factors among 43 MRSA clinical isolates in a Tunisian hospital.

Methods

We investigated enzymatic profiles, biofilm production and prevalences of genes encoding intracellular adhesion molecules (icaA and icaD), Microbial Surface Components Recognizing Adhesive Matrix Molecules genes (fnbA, fnbB and cna) and exoenzymes genes (geh, sspA and sspB).

Results

Our findings revealed that caseinase, gelatinase, lipase and lecithinase activities were detected in 100%, 100%, 76.6% and 93.3% of cases respectively. This study showed that 23 strains (76.7%) were slime producers on Congo red medium. Furthermore, 46.5% and 53.5% of isolates were respectively highly and moderately biofilm-forming on polystyrene. Significant association was found between both biofilm tests. PCR detection showed that 74.4%, 18.6%, 69.8%, 65.1% and 74.4% of isolates harbored fnbA, fnbB, icaA, icaD and cna genes respectively. In addition, 34.9%, 18.6% and 30.2% of MRSA strains were found positive for sspA, sspB and geh genes respectively. Further, statistical data showed that the presence of the fnbA and fnbB genes was significantly associated with a high biofilm production on polystyrene. However, no statistical association was observed for the icaA, icaD and cna genes.

Conclusions

This study indicates that the detection of fnbA and fnbB contributing to the first step of biofilm formation has been predictable of high biofilm production. As studied factors contribute to MRSA virulence, this research could be of value in orienting towards the development of new preventive and therapeutic measures.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is recognized worldwide as an important bacterial pathogen causing a wide range of infections ranging from skin and soft tissue lesions to lethal infections (osteomyelitis, endocarditis, pneumonia and septicaemia). It is regarded as a major world health threat with a substantial increase in morbidity and mortality [1]. In addition to resistance, the pathogenicity of MRSA is an extremely important feature to be understood. The pathogenesis of this bacterium depends on a combination of extracellular factors and biofilm forming ability [2]. The adherence of S. aureus to biotic and abiotic surfaces stage is mediated by a protein family of staphylococcal Microbial Surface Components Recognizing Adhesive Matrix Molecules (MSCRAMMs). Whereas the cell aggregation is led by the synthesis of polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA) molecule encoded by the intracellular adhesion (ica) [3,4,5,6].

Our aim was to establish a phenotypic characterization of virulence factors among MRSA clinical isolates in a Tunisian Hospital, to determine prevalences of genes encoding intracellular adhesion molecules (icaA and icaD), MSCRAMMs genes (fnbA, fnbB, cna) and exoenzymes genes (geh, sspA and sspB), and to investigate the involvement of these genes in biofilm forming ability.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains

A total of 43 non-redundant MRSA clinical isolates were obtained from the Laboratory of Microbiology of the University hospital of Monastir-Tunisia. These strains were obtained from bacteriological samples in hospitalized patients and/or consultants at the University Hospital of Monastir-Tunisia during the period (January 2016 - June 2016). Two reference strains (S. aureus ATCC 6538 and ATCC 43300) were used as controls. Bacterial identification was performed using Gram staining, catalase test, tube coagulase, DNase agar, mannitol salt agar and API ID 20 STAPH galleries (bio-Merieux, France). To confirm the identity of the isolate as S. aureus, the Sa442 gene was amplified by a PCR-based method. Extraction of genomic DNA was performed using a standard phenolechloroform technique. The PCR mixture (25 μl) for all genes contained 1 mM forward and reverse primers, dNTP mix (100 mM each of dATP, dCTP, dGTP and dTTP), 1 U of Go Taq DNA polymerase (Promega), 5 ml green Go Taq buffer (5X), and DNA template (50 ng). PCR conditions were the following: an initial temperature of 96°C (3min), followed by denaturation at 95°C (1min), annealing at 55°C (30s), elongation at 72°C (3min), and a final elongation step at 72°C (4min). Amplicons of the expected size (108 bp) were obtained. Methicillin resistance was confirmed using a cefoxitin disk (30 μg) on Mueller-Hinton agar plates (Bio-Rad, France) as recommended by the French Society of Microbiology and by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. The mecA gene was detected by PCR. PCR conditions were the following : an initial temperature of 95°C (1min), denaturation at 95°C (15s), annealing at 45°C (15 s), and elongation at 72°C (30s), with a final extension at 72°C (4min). Amplicons of the expected size (162 bp) were obtained [7]. PCR primers were chosen as listed in Table 1.

Table 1 List of primers used for bacterial identification and detection of MSCRAMMs genes (fnbA, fnbB and cna), biofim control genes (icaA and icaD) and exoenzymes genes (sspA, sspB and geh)
Full size table

Amplified PCR products were analyzed on 2% (wt/v) agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide (0.5 μg ml-1), visualized under ultraviolet transillumination and photographed using Gel Doc XR apparatus (Biorad, USA).

Characterization of the enzymatic activity

The ability to produce hydrolytic enzymes was determined after inoculation of cultures on TSA-1 media (Biorad) supplemented with: 1% (wt/vol) skim milk for caseinase; 1% (wt/vol) gelatin for gelatinase; Tween 80 for lipase and 5% (vol/vol) egg yolk for lecithinase. The presence of a clear halo around the colonies indicates the presence of the hydrolytic enzyme. The haemolytic activity was evaluated on bacteriological agar supplemented with 5% sheep’s blood [8].

Phenotypic determination of slime production

Phenotypic qualitative characterization of slime producing strains was carried out by the cultivation of the isolates on Congo red agar (CRA) plate made by mixing 36 g of sucrose (Sigma Chemical Company, St. Louis, MO) with 0.8 Congo red in 1L of brain heart infusion agar (Biorad, USA) as previously described [9]. The strains were incubated at 37°C for 24 hours under aerobic conditions followed by subsequent storage at room temperature. The Congo red dye interacts directly with certain bacterial polysaccharides forming a slime and giving black colonies in contrast to the non-producing colonies which remain red. After 48-72 hours, the results were interpreted as follows: strains producing intensive black, black, and reddish black colonies with a rough, dry, and crystalline consistency were classified as slime producers, whereas red and Bordeaux red with smooth colonies were considered to be non slime producers [9].

Semi-quantitative adherence assay

Biofilm production by MRSA strains, grown in Brain Heart Infusion with 1% glucose, was quantified using a semi-quantitative adherence assay on 96-well tissue culture plates as described previously [10]. Adherent bacteria were fixed with 95% ethanol and stained with 100 mL of 1% crystal violet (Merck, France) for 5 min. The microplates were air-dried and the optical density of each well was measured at 570 nm (OD570) using an automated Multiskan reader (GIO. DE VITA E C, ome, Italy). This assay was performed for each strain in triplicate. The background was determined by using noninoculated media as a control. The cut-off value (ODC) of noninoculated media at an optical density of 570 nm (OD570) was considered the deadline point to define biofilm quantities [cut-off (ODC) = mean OD + 3 standard deviation (SD) of negative control]. Biofilm formation was interpreted as highly positive (OD570> = 4 * ODC), moderately positive (2 * ODC <= OD570 <4 * ODC), weakly positive (ODC <= OD570 <2 * ODC) or negative (OD570 < ODC). These criteria were established by Stepanovic et al. [11].

Detection of icaA, icaD, fnbA, fnbB, cna, sspA, sspB and geh genes

PCR primers were chosen as listed in Table 1. Amplifications of icaA, icaD, fnbA, fnbB, cna, sspA, sspB and geh genes were performed according to the following cycle conditions: an initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min was followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30s, annealing for 30s at temperature determined for each gene as described in Table 1 and elongation at 72°C for 45s, followed by 10 min of final extension at 72°C.

Statistical analysis

The data from this study were captured, recorded and analyzed by SPSS 17.0 software. The non-parametric Mann Whitney U test was used to compare biofilm production assays (Congo red test and polystyrene adherence assay). The same statistical test was used to evaluate correlations of MSCRAMMs genes (fnbA, fnbB and cna), biofilm production control genes (icaA and icaD) and exoenzymes genes (sspA, sspB and geh) to the level of biofilm production on polystyrene. All factors with p values of less than 0.20 were included in multivariate ordinal logistic regression analysis. P values of less than 0.05 were considered to indicate significant difference.

Results

Distribution of isolates

A total of 43 MRSA strains were collected (i.e. a rate of 21.4% of all S. aureus isolates in the laboratory of Microbiology at the University Hospital of Monastir-Tunisia during the same period). Samples were gathered from different organs and systems: pus (58.1%), blood (25.6%), respiratory samples (11.6%) and catheters (4.7%). They were collected from patients admitted in surgery units (44.2%), intensive care units (25.6%), medical units (13.9%), Pediatrics/Neonatology (9.3%) and Gynecology (7.0%).

Characterization of the enzymatic activity

Our results showed that 51.1% and 48.9% of isolates were respectively beta and alpha-hemolytic. All isolates were protease producers (caseinase and gelatinase). Lipase and lecithinase secretion were found in 93.0% and 79.1% of cases respectively (Table 2).

Table 2 Exoenzymes production and hemolysis of studied strains
Full size table

Phenotypic determination of slime production

Out of 43 MRSA isolates, 30 strains (69.8%) were slime producers on the CRA plate. They were black or reddish black color colony producers. Slime production was noted in 16 out of 25 strains isolated from suppurations and in 9 out of 11 blood culture isolates (Table 3).

Table 3 Slime production and adherence assay of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates
Full size table

Semi-quantitative adherence assay

The results of OD570 presented in Table 3, showed that 46.5% and 53.5% strains were respectively highly and moderately biofilm-formers on polystyrene. No isolate was weakly or non-biofilm producer on polystyrene. We detected 5/11 blood culture isolates and 10/25 pus isolates considered as highly biofilm formers. Both reference strains S. aureus ATCC 6538 and ATCC 43300 were highly biofilm-forming on polystyrene.

Detection by PCR of icaA, icaD, fnbA, fnbB, cna, sspA, sspB and geh genes

The icaA and the icaD genes were present in 69.8% and 65.1% of MRSA isolates respectively. A concomitant presence of both genes was detected in 55.8% of the strains. Our results revealed that 74.4% and 18.6% of isolates respectively harbored the fnbA and fnbB genes. The cna gene coding for adhesin to collagen was detected in 32 strains (74.4%). Among the tested strains, 15 (34.9%), 8 (18.6%) and 13 (30.2%) were positive for sspA, sspB and geh genes.

Statistical analysis

Association between Congo red phenotypic test and adherence assay

Out of 20 highly-biofilm producing isolates, 18 showed a positive slime phenotype on Congo red agar. The nonparametric test of Mann Whitney U demonstrated that high biofilm production on polystyrene was significantly correlated with a positive Congo red phenotypic test (p = 0.017).

Association between biofilm production on polystyrene and biofilm related genes

Table 4 shows prevalence rates of MSCRAMMs genes (fnbA, fnbB and cna) and biofilm production control genes (icaA and icaD) depending on biofilm production. Univariate analysis followed by multivariate analysis showed that fnbA and fnbB genes were significantly associated with high biofilm production on polystyrene. However, no difference was observed in prevalence rates of icaA, icaD and cna genes between highly and moderately biofilm producing groups.

Table 4 Association between biofilm production on polystyrene and biofilm related genes
Full size table

Association between biofilm production on polystyrene and exoenzymes genes

Table 5 details the prevalence rates of genes encoding serine protease (sspA), cysteine protease (sspB) and lipase (geh) in moderate and high biofilm-producing groups. Analysis showed that the presence of sspB gene was significantly associated with high biofilm production on polystyrene (p=0.003). However, no differences were found in prevalence rates of sspA and geh genes between both groups (Table 5).

Table 5 Association between biofilm production on polystyrene and exoenzymes genes
Full size table

Discussion

S. aureus has emerged in recent decades as one of the leading causes of hospital and community infections [12]. Its virulence is a multifactorial process requiring the use of a variety of components regulated in a coordinated manner [2]. In this study, we noted that all isolates were alpha or beta-hemolytic. This finding agrees with the results of Barretti et al [13]. Hemolysin-α has pore-forming and pro-inflammatory properties. It binds to a membrane receptor and disrupts the integrity of host cells [14]. As for β-toxin, it is known to be the “hot-cold” hemolysin with a sphingomyelinase and a biofilm ligase activities [15,16,17].

Protease, lipase and lecithinase secretion were detected in most tested strains. Similar results were found by many reports [13, 18, 19]. S. aureus uses proteolytic and lipolytic exoenzymes to invade, damage the host tissue components and even spread to other sites [20]. They also protect against the innate immune system and are key mediators of secreted and cell wall-associated virulence determinant stability [21].

Biofilm formation is a major virulence factor. It provides inter-bacterial contact, accumulation of bacteria in superimposed layers, protection against the host immunity and acquisition of significant multiresistance [22, 23]. Our study showed that the majority of strains were slime producers on CRA. Several reports noted lower frequencies [13, 24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. In addition, all isolates were highly or moderately biofilm-forming on polystyrene. According to other studies, adhesion capacity was weaker [1, 4, 9, 10, 27, 28, 31,32,33,34]. This variability in adhesion capacity between MRSA strains can be explained by inter-strain variability of surface associated proteins and of biofilm production regulatory genes [23]. Significant association between biofilm production on polystyrene and Congo red test in our study highlights the performance of this non-costly phenotypic test to detect potential virulent S. aureus clinical isolates. Similarly, previous reports showed a high consistency between both tests [28, 30, 31].

Biofilm formation in S. aureus isolates occurs through the polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA) as well as the MSCRAMMs. These structures provide initial binding of S. aureus to host tissues and biomaterials [29]. After the step of adhesion and colonization of host cells and mucous membranes, a phase of tissue invasion occurs. It was demonstrated that fibronectin binding proteins FnbA and FnbB are involved in bacterial invasion of the endothelial cells in vivo and in vitro [35]. Prevalences of fnbA and fnbB genes were higher in other studies [36, 37]. Moreover, the intracellular adhesion (ica) operon is essential for the control of biofilm production. The synthesis of polymer matrix exopolysaccharides is monitored by the icaADBC operon, which encodes three membrane proteins (IcaA, IcaD, and IcaC) with enzymatic activity and one extracellular protein (IcaB). The PIA, encoded by this operon, plays also an important role in adhesion to epithelial cells and allows escaping the immune system of the host. Frequencies of icaA and icaD genes were also higher in several previous studies [4, 24, 26,27,28, 35, 37]. Our results showed that icaA and icaD genes were not present in all highly biofilm formers. This discrepancy between biofilm phenotype and genotype could be due to the fact that ica expression is dependent on environmental conditions [38].

Adhesion to collagen plays an important role in the pathogenesis induced by S. aureus [36]. The collagen binding protein Cna is the second most important adhesion molecule. Furthermore, the recombinant Cna can even be designed as an effective vaccine component and antibodies raised against Cna are protective in a mouse model of S. aureus induced septic death [39]. Most of studied isolates were positive for cna gene. Other reports revealed lower rates [4, 35, 37, 40].

The complexity of bacterial tools used for cell adherence and invasion ranges from single monomeric proteins to intricate multimeric macromolecules that perform highly sophisticated functions [41]. In contrast with this study, sspA, sspB and geh genes were harbored by all strains of another report [40].

  • With regard to the complexity and the variability of the biofilm phenotype, genetic studies identified numerous genes involved in biofilm formation. However, their relative importance is still unclear [42]. In the light of this, our multivariate analysis showed that the presence of fnbA and fnbB genes was significantly associated with a high biofilm production on polystyrene. This consolidates the alleged role of these genes in biofilm formation. Comparably, some studies suggested that detection of some adhesion factors is more practical for the prediction of biofilm formation [4, 31, 43]. Other reports have shown the decisive role of the ica gene [32, 33]. However, no statistical difference was found in the distribution of genes by some researchs [28, 31]. Such investigations aim to find new attractive targets for antivirulence therapy by overcoming biofilm formation [31].

We also found a significant association between the presence of sspB gene and biofilm production. In fact, a number of soluble extracellular proteins can affect biofilm formation. The relationship between staphylococcal enzymes activities and biofilm formation was reported by some studies. However, it remains to be elucidated and merits further investigation [44].

Conclusion

In summary, most of our MRSA isolates were highly biofilm producers with elevated prevalences of some MSCRAMMs genes and biofilm production control genes. The present study indicates that the detection of the adhesion factors (fnbA and fnbB genes) contributing to the first step of biofilm formation can be used as a biofilm formation marker in S. aureus. Further in-depth research could be of value in the development of new preventive and therapeutic measures of staphylococcal infections.

Abbreviations

ATCC:

American Type Culture Collection

Cna:

Collagen binding protein

CRA:

Congo red agar

DNA:

Deoxyribonucleic acid

Fnb:

Fibronectin binding protein

Ica:

Intracellular adhesion

MRSA:

Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus

MSCRAMMs:

Microbial Surface Components Recognizing Adhesive Matrix Molecules

OD:

Optical density

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

PIA:

Polysaccharide intercellular adhesion

TSA:

Trypticase soja agar

References

  1. Naicker PR, Karayem K, Hoek KG, Harvey J, Wasserman E. Biofilm formation in invasive Staphylococcus aureus isolates is associated with the clonal lineage. Microb Pathog. 2016;90:41–9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2015.10.023.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dinges MM, Orwin PM, Schlievert PM. Exotoxins of Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2000;13:16–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Donlan RM. Biofilms: microbial life on surfaces. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:881–90 https://doi.org/10.3201/eid0809.020063.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Khoramian B, Jabalameli F, Niasari-Naslaji A, Taherikalani M, Emaneini M. Comparison of virulence factors and biofilm formation among Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from human and bovine infections. Microb Pathog. 2015;88:73–7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2015.08.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Abraham NM, Jefferson KK. A low molecular weight component of serum inhibits biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus. Microb Pathog. 2010;49:388–91 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2010.07.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Dobinsky S, Kiel K, Rohde H, Bartscht K, Knobloch JK, Horstkotte MA, et al. Glucose-related dissociation between icaADBC transcription and biofilm expression by Staphylococcus epidermidis: evidence for an additional factor required for polysaccharide intercellular adhesin synthesis. J Bacteriol. 2003;185:2879–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Milheiriço C, Oliveira DC, de Lencastre H. Multiplex PCR strategy for subtyping the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type IV in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: ‘SCCmec IV multiplex’. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007;60:42–8 https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkm112.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stulik L, Malafa S, Hudcova J, Rouha H, Henics BZ, Craven DE, et al. α- Hemolysin activity of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus predicts ventilator-associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;15:1139–48 https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201406-1012OC.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kouidhi B, Zmantar T, Hentati H, Bakhrouf A. Cell surface hydrophobicity, formation, adhesives properties and molecular detection of adhesins genes in Staphylococcus aureus associated to dental caries. Microb Pathog. 2010;49:14–22 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2010.03.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Manago K, Nishi J, Wakimoto N, Miyanohara H, Sarantuya J, et al. Biofilm formation by and accessory gene regulator typing of methicilin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains recovered from patient with nosocomial infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006;27:188–90 https://doi.org/10.1086/500620.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stepanovic S, Vukovic D, Dakic I, Savic B, Svabic-Vlahovic M. A modified microtiter-plate test for quantification of staphylococcal biofilm formation. J Microbiol Methods. 2000;40:175–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gould I. Costs of hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and its control. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2006;28:379–84 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2006.09.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Barretti P, Montelli AC, Batalha JE, Caramori JC, Cunha Mde L. The role of virulence factors in the outcome of staphylococcal peritonitis in CAPD patients. BMC Infect Dis. 2009;9(212) https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-9-212.

  14. Inoshima N, Wang Y, Wardenburg JB. Genetic requirement for ADAM10 in severe Staphylococcus aureus skin infection. J Invest Dermatol. 2012;132:1513–6 https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Salgado-Pabón W, Herrera A, Vu BG, Stach CS, Merriman JA, et al. Staphylococcus aureus β-toxin production is common in strains with the β-toxin gene inactivatedby bacteriophage. J Infect Dis. 2014;210:784–92 https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiu146.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Diep BA, Carleton HA, Chang RF, Sensabaugh GF, Perdreau-Remington F. Roles of 34 virulence genes in the evolution of hospital- and community-associated strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Infect Dis. 2006;193:1495–503 https://doi.org/10.1086/503777.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Huseby MJ, Kruse AC, Digre J, et al. Beta toxin catalyzes formation of nucleoprotein matrix in staphylococcal biofilms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:14407–12 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911032107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Wu PZ, Zhu H, Thakur A, Willcox MD. Comparison of potential pathogenic traits of staphylococci that may contribute to corneal ulceration and inflammation. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1999;27:234–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lakshmi HP, Prasad UV, Yeswanth S, Swarupa V, Prasad OH, Narasu ML, et al. Molecular characterization of α-amylase from Staphylococcus aureus. Bioinformation. 2013;9:281–5. https://doi.org/10.6026/97320630009281.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kolar SL, Ibarra JA, Rivera FE, Mootz JM, Davenport JE, et al. Extracellular proteases are key mediators of Staphylococcus aureus virulence via the global modulation of virulence-determinant stability. Microbiologyopen. 2013;2:18–34 https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Donlan RM, Costerton JW. Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002;15:167–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Pozzi C, Waters E, Rudkin J, Schaeffer C, Lohan A, Tong P, et al. Methicillin Resistance Alters the Biofilm Phenotype and Attenuates Virulence in Staphylococcus aureus Device-Associated Infections. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8:1002626 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1002626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mulcahy ME, Geoghegan JA, Monk IR, O’Keeffe KM, Walsh EJ, Foster TJ, et al. Nasal colonisation by Staphylococcus aureus depends upon clumping factor B binding to the squamous epithelial cell envelope protein loricrin. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8:1003092 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. El-Mahallawy HA, Loutfy SA, El-Wakil M, El-Al AK, Morcos H. Clinical implications of icaA and icaD genes in coagulase negative staphylococci and Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in febrile neutropenic pediatric cancer patients. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2009;52:824–8 https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.21964.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Elkhatib WF, Khairalla AS, Ashour HM. Evaluation of Different Microtiter Plate-Based Methods for the Quantitative Assessment of Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms. Future Microbiol. 2014;9:725–35 https://doi.org/10.2217/fmb.14.33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Arciola CR, Baldassarri L, Montanaro L. Presence of icaA and icaD genes and slime production in a collection of staphylococcal strains from catheter-associated infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:2151–6 https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.39.6.2151-2156.2001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Lindsay JA, Moore CE, Day NP, Peacock SJ, Witney AA, Stabler RA. Microarrays reveal that each of the ten dominant lineages of Staphylococcus aureus has a unique combination of surface-associated and regulatory genes. J Bacteriol. 2006;188:669–76 https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.188.2.669-676.2006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Grinholc M, Wegrzyn G, Kurlenda J. Evaluation of biofilm production and prevalence of the icaD gene in methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from patients with nosocomial infections and carriers. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2007;50:375–9 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-695X.2007.00262.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Jain A, Agarwal A. Biofilm production, a marker of pathogenic potential of colonizing and commensal staphylococci. J Microbiol Methods. 2009;76:88–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2008.09.017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Arciola CR, Campoccia D, Baldassarri L, Donati ME, Pirini V, Gamberini S, et al. Detection of biofilm formation in Staphylococcus epidermidis from implant infections. Comparison of a PCR-method that recognizes the presence of ica genes with two classic phenotypic methods. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2006;76:425–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cha JO, Yoo JI, Yoo JS, Chung HS, Park SH, Kim HS, et al. Investigation of Biofilm Formation and its Association with the Molecular and Clinical Characteristics of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2013;4:225–32 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrp.2013.09.001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Nourbakhsh F, Namvar AE. Detection of genes involved in biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus isolates. GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2016;22(11) https://doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000267.

  33. Szczuka E, Urbańska K, Pietryka M, Kaznowski A. Biofilm density and detection of biofilm-producing genes in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains. Folia Microbiol. 2013;58:47–52 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-012-0175-9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Namvar AE, Asghari B, Ezzatifar F, Azizi G, Lari AR. Detection of the intercellular adhesion gene cluster (ica) in clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates. GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2013;29(8) https://doi.org/10.3205/dgkh000203.

  35. Peacock S, Moore C, Justice A, Kantazanou M, Story L, Mackie K, et al. Virulent combinations of adhesin and toxin genes in natural populations of Staphyloccus aureus. Infect Immun. 2002;70:4987–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Arciola CR, Campoccia D, Gamberini S, Baldassarri L, Montanaro L. Prevalence of cna, fnbA and fnbB adhesin genes among Staphylococcus aureus isolates from orthopedic infections associated to different types of implant. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2005;246:81–6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsle.2005.03.035.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rahimi F, Katouli M, Karimi S. Biofilm production among methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from catheterized patients with urinary tract infection. Microb Pathog. 2016;98:69–76 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2016.06.031.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Zmantar T, Chaieb K, Makni H, Miladi H, Abdallah FB, Mahdouani K, et al. Detection by PCR of adhesins genes and slime production in clinical Staphylococcus aureus. J Basic Microbiol. 2018;48:308–14 https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.20070028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Madani A, Garakani K, Mofrad MRK. Molecular mechanics of Staphylococcus aureus adhesin, CNA, and the inhibition of bacterial adhesion by stretching collagen. PLoS One. 2017;12:0179601 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Karlsson A, Arvidson S. Variation in extracellular protease production among clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus due to different levels of expression of the protease repressor sarA. Infect Immun. 2002;70:4239–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Pizzaro-Cerda J, Cossart P. Bacterial adhesion and entry into host cells. Cell. 2006;124:715–27 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Tang J, Chen J, Li H, Zeng P, Li J. Characterization of adhesin genes, staphylococcal nuclease, hemolysis and biofilm formation among Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from different sources. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2013;10:757–63 https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2012.1474.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. O'Neill E, Pozzi C, Houston P, Humphreys H, Robinson DA, Loughman A, et al. A novel Staphylococcus aureus biofilm phenotype mediated by the fibronectin-binding proteins, FnBPA and FnBPB. J Bacteriol. 2008;190:3835–50 https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00167-08.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Mann EE, Rice KC, Boles BR, Endres JL, Ranjit D, Chandramohan L, et al. Modulation of eDNA release and degradation affects Staphylococcus aureus biofilm maturation. PLoS One. 2009;9:e5822 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Saïd-Salim B, Dunman PM, McAleese FM, Macapagal D, Murphy E, McNamara PJ, et al. Global regulation of Staphylococcus aureus genes by Rot. J Bacteriol. 2003;185:610–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was financed by the Higher education and scientific research in Tunisia through the laboratory of Transmissible Diseases and Biologically Active Substances, LR99ES27, Faculty of Pharmacy, Monastir University, street Avicenne 5000 Monastir (Tunisia).

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire de Microbiologie, CHU Fatouma Bourguiba de Monastir, Monastir, Tunisie

    Ons Haddad, Aida Elargoubi, Hajer Rhim, Yosr Kadri & Maha Mastouri

  2. Laboratoire des Maladies Transmissible et Substances Biologiquement Actives, LR99ES27, Faculté de Pharmacie de Monastir, Université de Monastir, Monastir, Tunisie

    Ons Haddad, Abderrahmen Merghni, Aida Elargoubi, Hajer Rhim, Yosr Kadri & Maha Mastouri

Authors
  1. Ons Haddad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abderrahmen Merghni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Aida Elargoubi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hajer Rhim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yosr Kadri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Maha Mastouri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

OH, YK and MM collected and cultured the strains. OH, AM, AE and MM designed the experiments. OH, AM and HR carried out the experiments. OH and AE analyzed the data. OH, AM and MM prepared the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ons Haddad.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haddad, O., Merghni, A., Elargoubi, A. et al. Comparative study of virulence factors among methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates. BMC Infect Dis 18, 560 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-018-3457-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-018-3457-2

Keywords

BMC Infectious Diseases

ISSN: 1471-2334

Contact us