Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Plasmid-based high-resolution melting analysis for accurate detection of rpoB mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Moroccan patients

BMC Infectious DiseasesBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:548

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2666-4

©  The Author(s). 2017

  • Received: 25 April 2017
  • Accepted: 2 August 2017
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Rapid diagnosis of drug resistance in tuberculosis (TB) is pivotal for the timely initiation of effective antibiotic treatment to prevent the spread of drug-resistant strains. The development of low-cost, rapid and robust methods for drug-resistant TB detection is highly desirable for resource-limited settings.

Methods

We report the use of an in house plasmid-based quantitative polymerase chain reaction-high-resolution melting (qPCR-HRM) analysis for the detection of mutations related to rifampicin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) in clinical isolates from Moroccan patients. Five recombinant plasmids containing predominant mutations (S531L, S531W, H526Y and D516V) and the wild-type sequence of the Rifampicin Resistance-Determining Region (RRDR) have been used as controls to screen 45 rifampicin-resistant and 22 rifampicin-susceptible MTB isolates.

Results

The sensitivity and the specificity of the qPCR-HRM analysis were 88.8% and 100% respectively as compared to rifampicin Drug Susceptibility Testing (DST). The results of qPCR-HRM and DNA sequencing had a concordance of 100%.

Conclusion

Our qPCR-HRM assay is a sensitive, accurate and cost-effective assay for the high-throughput screening of mutation-based drug resistance in TB reference laboratories.

Keywords

  • Tuberculosis
  • Drug resistance
  • qPCR-HRM
  • Plasmid-based controls
  • Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Background

Tuberculosis (TB) is a major public health problem with 10.4 million new cases and 1.8 million deaths each year worldwide [1]. In developing countries, such as Morocco, the increasing incidence of drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains is one of the major factors sustaining the current TB epidemic. In 2015, Morocco registered 31,403 new TB cases, in which 1% were rifampicin resistant (RR) and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) cases [1].

Rifampicin (RIF) is a main first-line anti-TB drug and forms the backbone of short-course TB treatment in combination with isoniazid (INH). Resistance to rifampicin is caused by spontaneous mutations, which occur in the rpoB gene, the RNA polymerase beta-subunit encoding locus. Genetic studies have demonstrated that more than 95% of the resistance to RIF was associated with mutations in a defined 81 bp hot-spot region (codons 507–533) of the rpoB gene, termed rifampicin resistance-determining region (RRDR) [2–4].

Traditional phenotypic drug susceptibility tests pose delays in the detection of resistance due to the slow growth rate (days to weeks) in culturing M. tuberculosis specimens. Thus, rapid diagnosis of drug resistance to TB is crucial for the timely initiation of effective antibiotic treatment to prevent the spread of drug-resistant strains. Therefore, molecular-based techniques such as DNA sequencing, real-time PCR, DNA microarrays and line probe assays, have been applied to detect mutations related to TB drug resistance within 1–2 days using clinical samples or culture isolates [5–8].

The World Health Organization (WHO) has endorsed molecular line probe assays (LPA) such as INNO-LiPA® RIF TB, GenoType®MTBDR/MTBDRplus and GenoType® MTBDRsl as well as the fully automated Xpert® MTB/RIF assay and recently the Xpert® MTB/RIF Ultra for the rapid determination of genetic mutations associated with resistance to rifampicin, isoniazid and second-line anti-tuberculosis drugs [9–11]. Although these assays offer rapid analysis and high sensitivity and specificity, they have the disadvantage of being unable to cover a large panel of mutations into the rpoB sequence and are high cost to implement in resource-limited countries.

Recently, high-resolution melting analysis (HRMA) has been investigated for the detection of mutations such as single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) conferring drug resistance. This method relies on the identification of differences in PCR melting curves involving the use of dsDNA-binding dyes [12]. Several studies have evaluated HRM for the detection of resistance in cultured isolates of M. tuberculosis with high sensitivity and specificity as compared to conventional drug susceptibility testing in clinical practice [13]. HRM is a simple, cost-efficient and closed-tube system that requires only unlabeled primers and a dsDNA binding dye for analyzing the genotype without the need for specific probes.

The aim of the present study was to develop a plasmid-based quantitative polymerase chain reaction-HRM (qPCR-HRM) assay for accurate and cost-effective identification of RIF-resistant M. tuberculosis strains and to determine the main mutations conferring resistance to RIF in clinical isolates from Morocco.

Methods

Bacterial isolates and drug susceptibility testing

The ethics charter of the Pasteur Institute of Morocco (Casablanca, Morocco) approved the consent procedure and the protocols (IRB reference number: IPM2013-P3). The framework of the charter ensures the protection of patient’s clinical information and confidential preservation of the results. Sixty seven clinical M. tuberculosis isolates from TB-confirmed patients were provided by the tuberculosis reference laboratory of the Pasteur Institute of Morocco (Casablanca, Morocco). Drug susceptibility testing (DST) of the selected samples was previously established using the proportion method in Lowenstein-Jensen (L-J) medium [14]. Two groups of strains were used in this study: 45 rifampicin resistant (RIF-R) and 22 rifampicin susceptible (RIF-S) isolates.

DNA extraction

Mycobacterial genomic DNA was extracted and purified using QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, USA) in accordance with the protocol provided by the manufacturer. DNA yield and purity was checked with a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (NanoDrop 2000, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Purified genomic DNA was stored at −20 °C until analysis.

Construction of reference plasmids

To evaluate the specificity of HRM discrimination among different types of mutations, five plasmid-controls were designed and constructed. These plasmids contained four of the most predominant mutations (S531L, S531W, H526Y, or D516V) and a fifth wild-type (WT) plasmid with no mutation in the 81 bp hot-spot region. For each plasmid, 377 bp segment of rpoB gene containing the RRDR region was synthetically generated and then cloned into a 2507 bp pEX-K vector (Eurofins MWG Operon, Germany). All the vectors were then used to transform highly competent E. coli (New England Biolabs, MA, USA). Transformed E. coli cells carrying recombinant plasmid DNA were grown overnight in Luria Bertani (LB) broth (10 mL, Sigma Aldrich, USA) containing kanamycin (50 μg mL−1, Invitrogen, USA) at 37 °C at 300 rpm constant shaking. The bacterial cultures were harvested by centrifugation at 6000×g for 15 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was removed and the cell pellets consisting of the recombinant plasmid were isolated and purified with Wizard® Plus SV Minipreps DNA Purification System (Promega, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The purified plasmid DNA samples were quantified and then stored at −20 °C.

Real-time PCR and HRM analysis

To perform qPCR-HRM, primers were manually designed to specifically amplify a 120 bp amplicon spanning the RRDR (RRDR-Fwd, 5′-CCGCGATCAAGGAGTTCTTC-3′; RRDR-Rev., 5′-GTGACAGACCGCCGGG-3′). Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) analysis (National Center for Biotechnology Information, NCBI) was performed on the primer pair to evaluate their specificity.

The reaction mixture was made up using 2X MeltDoctor HRM Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, USA) (10 μL), each primer (1.5 μL, 3 μM), genomic or plasmid DNA (5 μL) and diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC)-treated water (1 μL) to obtain a 20 μl final reaction volume. The staining method used in the qPCR-HRM assays was based on the SYTO9® intercalating dye. SYTO9® is a third generation dye, which is more robust to generate shaped melting curves as compared to SYBR Green I. The latter dye is known to cause PCR inhibition when used at high concentrations, leading to redistribution problems during melting stage. SYTO9® can be used at higher concentrations due to low reaction toxicity, drastically increasing dsDNA saturation and avoiding redistribution effects during DNA dissociation.

Quantitative PCR and HRM assays were performed in 96-fast well plates using an integrated QuantStudio 6 Flex System (Applied Biosystems, USA). QuantStudio™ 6 heating block has the capability to control the temperature by less than 0.1 °C increments, which offers a high melt precision.PCR cycling run under the following conditions: one cycle of 95 °C for 10 min, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 1 min. HRM curve acquisition was performed during a post-PCR stage (dissociation stage). Previously amplified samples were heated to 95 °C for 10 s, cooled to 60 °C for 1 min, and then heated from 60 °C to 95 °C rising by 0.025 °C s−1. Analysis of the obtained curves was performed using the High Resolution Melt Module for QuantStudio™ 6 and 7 Flex Real-Time PCR System Software that allows both acquisition and analyses of PCR plots and HRM curves on the same interface. All samples were tested in duplicates including negative and positive controls and different genotypes were assigned in accordance to the HRM curves of plasmid controls.

PCR and DNA sequencing

The primers rpoB-F 5′-GGGAGCGGATGACCACCCA-3′ and rpoB-R 5′ GCGGTACGGCGTTTCGATGAAC-3′ were previously described [15] to amplify a 350-bp segment of rpoB containing the RRDR region. PCR reactions were performed with a Veriti Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems, USA) using PCR Supermix (Invitrogen, USA) under the following cycling conditions: (i) an initial step at 95 °C for 5 min, (ii) 35 cycles at 95 °C for 45 s, 68 °C for 45 s and 72 °C for 45 s, and (iii) a 10-min step at 72 °C.

The sequencing was carried out by utilizing the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and an Applied Biosystems 3730 DNA Analyzer from Secugen (Madrid, Spain). Constructed plasmid controls and H37Ra PCR products were used as an internal control to validate the results. The mutations were detected by mapping against H37Rv strain as a reference sequence obtained from GenBank (NCBI, Bethesda, MD, USA) (Accession on NC_000962). Sequence alignment was carried out by using BioEdit 7.2.5 software (Ibis Biosciences, Carlsbad, CA, USA).

Statistical analysis

Sensitivity, specificity as well as concordance of the qPCR-HRM assay were calculated in comparison with the standard DST and DNA sequencing, respectively. Sensitivity was defined as [Number of drug-resistant isolates with mutations]/[Number of drug-resistant isolates with mutations + number of drug-resistant isolates without mutation]; and specificity as [Number of drug-susceptible isolates without mutations]/[number of drug susceptible isolates with mutations + number of drug-susceptible isolates without mutations] [16]. Concordance analysis was performed to assess the near-equivalence of the qPCR-HRM and DNA sequencing used for assessing presence/absence of mutations [17]. Concordance between the two techniques results was calculated as [Number of drug-resistant isolates with mutations + number of drug-susceptible isolates without mutations]/[total number of samples]. Sensitivity and specificity calculations were estimated at a 95% confidence interval [95% CI]. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 17.0 software (SPSS Inc., USA).

Results

Sixty seven M. tuberculosis strains from TB-confirmed patients were enrolled in this study. Among them, 45 cases were phenotypically RIF-resistant and 22 cases were RIF-susceptible. In comparison to phenotypic data, rpoB genotyping showed that all strains harboring mutations in the RRDR were resistant to rifampicin. The rpoB mutations detected by HRM and confirmed by DNA sequencing were summarized in the Table 1. Amplification products from M. tuberculosis H37ra genomic DNA and M. tuberculosis RIF-susceptible isolates had the same melting profile when compared to pEX-K WT melt curve. Additionally, HRM profiles of the recombinant plasmids carrying mutations (pEX-K D516V, pEX-K H526Y, pEX-K S531L and pEX-K S531W) were accurately discriminated (Fig. 1) and labeled by the HRM software as controls.
Table 1

Mutations detected by qPCR-HRM and confirmed by DNA sequencing

Rifampicin phenotypic profile

Amino Acid Change

Nucleotide Change

Number of mutations (Percentage)

qPCR-HRM assay

DNA Sequencing

Resistant (45)

S531L

TCG>TTG

32 (71.1%)

Mutant

Mutant

S531W

TCG>TGG

2 (4.4%)

Mutant

Mutant

H526Y

CAC>TAC

2 (4.4%)

Mutant

Mutant

H526L

CAC>CTC

1 (2.2%)

Mutant

Mutant

H526C

CAC>TGC

3 (6.7%)

Mutant

Mutant

No mutation

-

5 (11.1%)

Wild

Wild

Susceptible (22)

No mutation

-

--

Wild

Wild

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

High resolution melting analysis of five plasmid-based controls. Representative aligned (a) and difference (b) curves derived from the normalized data using pEX-K WildType and M. tuberculosis H37ra reference strain as the baseline and four pEX-K plasmids harboring D516V, H526Y, S531W and S531L mutations

All M. tuberculosis strains carrying H526Y, S531L and S531W were correctly defined in control groups, with the exception of D516V group, as no D516V mutation was found in all analyzed M. tuberculosis rifampicin-resistant isolates. The five plasmid-based controls had a specificity of 100%, and the plasmid control pEX-K WT differentiated all WT genotypes from those including single or double mutations. Furthermore, all strains presenting the S531L, S531W and H526Y changes were identified and sorted according to their corresponding plasmid controls and no strains with other mutations (variants) were included in control groups. Additionally, two mutations have been classified in variant groups 1 and 2 (Fig. 2) and were then identified by DNA sequencing as single mutation H526L (CAC/CTC) and double mutation H526C (CAC/TGC), respectively.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Plasmid-based high resolution melting analysis of M. tuberculosis isolates. Differential plots of the 120 bp segment of the rpoB gene from Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates. The five plasmid controls melting profiles were set up as reference control groups. The baseline represents the pEX-K WT, M. tuberculosis H37ra and RIF-S isolates, as well as five RIF-R isolates. Melting profile genotypes were indicated by matching to previously set control groups. The other melt curves including mutations were clearly distinguishable and control groups were defined as variants

Among 45 genotypically typed RIF-resistant isolates, the mutation S531L (TCG/TTG) was the most encountered (71.1%, 32/45), followed by H526C (CAC/TGC) (6.7%, 3/45), S531W (TCG/TGG) and H526Y (CAC/TAC) (equally 4.4%, 2/45) and H526L (CAC/CTC) (2.2%, 1/45) (Table 1). In addition, no deletions or insertions were detected. However, 5/45 RIF resistant M. tuberculosis isolates contained no mutation in the rpoB amplified region and were classified as phenotypically RIF-resistant isolates.

HRMA identified 40 of 45 isolates that were resistant and 22/22 (100%) that were susceptible on DST by L-J proportion method with a sensitivity and specificity of 88.8% (95% CI: 75.95–96.29) and 100% (95% CI: 84.56–100.00), respectively. The concordance between HRMA and DNA sequencing was 100%, where the 40 genotypically RIF-resistant isolates were correctly categorized as single or double mutations in the RRDR region while all the 22 RIF-susceptible isolates were classified as WT.

Discussion

Investigating the prevalence of geography-specific mutations is important for the development of in-house qPCR-HRM assays targeting relevant mutations in each specific setting. In this study, we have developed and evaluated a qPCR-HRM assay for accurate detection of mutations mostly associated with resistance to rifampicin. All mutations in the resistant isolates had specific melt curve patterns and were further characterized by DNA sequencing. In accordance with the previous reports from Lebanon, Iran/Iraq, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates, China, Belarus, Honduras, Romania, and Uganda [18–21], the most frequently occurring mutations detected in our study were at codon 531 (75.5%), followed by codon 526 (13.3%). In comparison to the reports from Morocco [22–26], mutations at codons 531 had relative frequencies varying from 49.8% to 83.6%. The high frequency of codon 531 mutant isolates could be due to the spread of an endemic clone or a biased sampling due to a relatively small number of isolates. Notably, a double mutation at codon 526 (H526C) was observed in Moroccan isolates with a relatively high frequency (6.7%, 3/45). This mutation was previously reported in Moroccan [27], Turkish [28], Chinese & German [29], and Korean [30] isolates with low frequencies.

Our study confirmed the accuracy of plasmid-based controls for rpoB mutation detection by qPCR-HRM as previously reported by others [31, 32]. Including the plasmid controls pEX-K S531W and pEX-K D516V in the qPCR-HRM assay has demonstrated the high sensitivity of the assay in discriminating resistant isolates carrying SNP class 3 and 4, which were the most challenging mutations (C/G and A/T, respectively). In these SNP classes, bases switch only their specific strands, resulting in low melting temperatures differences (∆Tm) that are difficult to identify, which can lead to false negative results [33]. In addition, the use of plasmid-based controls was proven to be a valuable alternative to genomic DNA as it reduced the cost of the assay as compared to the high-cost, labor-intensive and time-consuming preparation of reference strains DNA that requires biosafety level (BSL-3) facilities [32, 34]. Moreover, the plasmid-based controls allow not only the detection of the drug-resistant TB presence, but also the identification of the nature of rpoB mutation. Thus, this permits the establishment of an accurate diagnosis of RIF resistance in case of mutation occurrence associated with different levels of rifampicin resistance [35, 36]. It could be also useful for an absolute quantitative detection when pathogen copy number is necessary for disease and treatment control.

According to our results, there was phenotypic and genotypic concordance in 40 out of 45 resistant isolates. All genotypes determined by qPCR-HRM were confirmed by DNA sequencing with a concordance of 100%. The sensitivity (88.8%) and specificity (100%) of the qPCR-HRM assay in the present study are consistent with previously published studies using HRM in clinical isolates [31, 37–41]. Only five phenotypically resistant isolates were genotypically susceptible (WT), which has affected the sensitivity of the assay. For these strains, other mutations might have occurred outside the rpoB region examined in the present work. Although resistance to rifampicin is mostly mediated by mutations located in the 81-bp RRDR of rpoB gene, other mutations can be occasionally associated with resistance to rifampicin. Several studies in various geographic locations have reported mutations outside the RRDR hot spot: (GTC/TTC) at codon 176 [42] and (GCG/GTG) at codon 381 [43]. Mutation at codon 146 (V to F) was found frequently in M. tuberculosis strains recovered from patients of Middle Eastern origin [44]. However, it is speculated that additional mechanisms such as low cell wall permeability, the presence of membrane proteins acting as drug efflux pumps or the production of drug-modifying and inactivating enzymes can contribute to rifampicin resistance in Mycobacteria [45, 46].

Our study results have confirmed the performance of HRMA as a method for the rapid and accurate detection of mutations associated to MDR-TB as previously reported by studies that have successfully discriminated resistant strains from clinical isolates [31, 37–40]. Furthermore, in a recent study, Sharma et al. have evaluated HRM curve analysis as a rapid approach for the diagnosis and screening of rifampicin resistance in tuberculous meningitis directly from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples [47]. More recently, Anthwal et al. have reported the use of a plasmid-based HRM assay for direct detection of MDR-TB in sputum, especially for direct smear negative cases [32]. These studies suggest that HRMA can be a robust, accurate, sensitive and cost-effective diagnostic technology for the detection of MDR-TB on both clinical isolates and patient samples.

Conclusion

This is the first study of developing and evaluating a plasmid-based qPCR-HRM assay for rifampicin resistance screening in cultured isolates from Moroccan TB patients. The results indicate that this assay has the potential to be a valuable high-throughput, accurate and cost-effective technology in TB reference laboratories. However, further evaluation of our qPCR-HRM assay directly on sputum samples would be crucial to shorten the delay in drug resistance diagnosis. Moreover, screening the rpoB gene in a larger population can reveal new region-specific mutations that may occur out of RRDR. Thus, covering other regions in the rpoB gene would enable the detection of unidentified mutations by building a library of plasmid controls harboring frequently occurring mutations.

Abbreviations

DEPC: 

Diethyl Pyrocarbonate

dsDNA: 

Double Stranded deoxyribonucleic acid

DST: 

Drug Susceptibility Testing

INH: 

Isoniazid

LB: 

Luria Bertani

L-J: 

Lowenstein-Jensen

MDR-TB: 

Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis

MTB: 

Mycobacterium tuberculosis

qPCR-HRM: 

quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction-High-Resolution Melting

RIF: 

Rifampicin

rpoB : 

RNA polymerase beta-subunit

RR: 

Rifampicin Resistant

RRDR: 

Rifampicin Resistance-Determining Region

SNP: 

Single Nucleotide Polymorphism

TB: 

Tuberculosis

Declarations

Acknowledgemnts

We thank all patients who have kindly agreed to provide us with the samples analyzed.

Funding

This work was funded by the Moroccan Foundation for Advanced Sciences, Innovation and Research (MAScIR).

Availability of data and materials

The raw data will be provided upon request by Dr. Hassan Ait Benhassou

Author’s contributions

HAB, SA, HS conceived and designed the study. EMB participated in the design of the study, carried out the experiments and wrote the manuscript. MA and MDE participated in the conception and design of the study, contributed in the recruitment of participants and revised the manuscript critically. MM collected patient’s samples, performed phenotypic DST and helped in the acquisition of data and in the drafting of the manuscript. AKY participated in the interpretation of the results and revised the manuscript critically. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was performed with respect to the ethics charter of the Pasteur Institute of Morocco that approved the patient consent procedure and experimental protocols (IRB reference number: IPM2013-P3). A verbal informed consent was obtained from all participants. Patient’s clinical information and respective experimental results were kept confidential in the framework of the charter.

Consent for publication

Not applicable. This manuscript does not contain any individual person data.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Medical Biotechnology Center, Moroccan Foundation for Advanced Science, Innovation and Research (MAScIR), Rabat Design Center, Avenue Mohamed El Jazouli - Madinat Al Irfane, 10100 Rabat, Morocco
(2)
Laboratory of Tuberculosis, Pasteur Institute of Morocco, Casablanca, Morocco
(3)
Laboratory of Mycobacteria Genetics, Pasteur Institute of Morocco, Tangier, Morocco
(4)
Harvard−MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard University and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 65 Landsdowne Street, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
(5)
Laboratory of Biochemistry and Immunology, Faculty of Sciences, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco

References

  1. World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2016. 2016; Available from: http://www.who.int/tb/publications/global_report/en/. Accessed 1 Aug 2017.
  2. Ramaswamy S, Musser JM. Molecular genetic basis of antimicrobial agent resistance inMycobacterium tuberculosis: 1998 update. Tuber Lung Dis. 1998;79:3–29.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Telenti A, Imboden P, Marchesi F, Matter L, Schopfer K, Bodmer T, et al. Detection of rifampicin-resistance mutations in mycobacterium tuberculosis. Lancet Elsevier. 1993;341:647–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Traore H, van Deun A, Shamputa IC, Rigouts L, Portaels F Oise Direct detection of mycobacterium tuberculosis complex DNA and rifampin resistance in clinical specimens from tuberculosis patients by line probe assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. Am Soc Microbiol; 2006;44:4384–4388.Google Scholar
  5. Cho EH, Bae HK, Kang SK, Lee EH. Detection of isoniazid and rifampicin resistance by sequencing of katG, inhA, and rpoB genes in Korea. Korean J Lab Med. 2009;29:455–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Huang W-L, Chen H-Y, Kuo Y-M, Jou R. Performance assessment of the GenoType MTBDRplus test and DNA sequencing in detection of multidrug-resistant mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:2520–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Morgan M, Kalantri S, Flores L, Pai M. A commercial line probe assay for the rapid detection of rifampicin resistance in mycobacterium tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2005;5:62.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Tang X, Morris SL, Langone JJ, Bockstahler LE. Microarray and allele specific PCR detection of point mutations in mycobacterium tuberculosis genes associated with drug resistance. J Microbiol Methods Elsevier. 2005;63:318–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. World Health Organization. Molecular line probe assays for rapid screening of patients at risk of MultiDrug-Resistant Tuberculosis (MDR-TB) [Internet]. 2008. Available from: http://www.who.int/tb/laboratory/line_probe_assays/en/. Accessed 1 Aug 2017.
  10. World Health Organization. Xpert MTB/RIF assay for the diagnosis of pulmonary and extrapulmonary TB in adults and children [Internet]. 2013. Available from: http://www.who.int/tb/publications/xpert-mtb-rif-assay-diagnosis-policy-update/en/ Accessed 1 August 2017.
  11. World Health Organization. Next-generation Xpert® MTB/RIF Ultra assay recommended by WHO [Internet]. 2017. Available from: http://who.int/tb/features_archive/Xpert-Ultra/en/. Accessed 1 Aug 2017.
  12. Pietzka AT, Indra A, Stöger A, Zeinzinger J, Konrad M, Hasenberger P, et al. Rapid identification of multidrug-resistant mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates by rpoB gene scanning using high-resolution melting curve PCR analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009;63:1121–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Yin X, Zheng L, Liu Q, Lin L, Hu X, Hu Y, et al. High-resolution melting curve analysis for rapid detection of rifampin resistance in mycobacterium tuberculosis: a meta-analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:3294–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Canetti G, Froman S, Al GJ, Hauduroy P, Langerova M, Mahler HT, et al. Mycobacteria: laboratory methods for testing drug sensitivity and resistance. Bull World Health Organ. 1963;29:565.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Tho DQ, Ha DTM, Duy PM, Lan NTN, Hoa DV, Chau NVV, et al. Comparison of MAS-PCR and GenoType MTBDR assay for the detection of rifampicin-resistant mycobacterium tuberculosis. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2008;12:1306–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Altman DG, Bland JM. Diagnostic tests. 1: Sensitivity and specificity. BMJ Br. Med. J. 1994;308:1552.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Kwiecien R, Kopp-Schneider A. Concordance analysis: part 16 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications. Dtsch. Arztebl. Int. 2011 [cited 2017 Jul 9]; Available from: https://wwwncbinlmnihgov/pmc/articles/PMC3165924/. Accessed 1 Aug 2017.
  18. Ahmad S, Araj GF, Akbar PK, Fares E, Chugh TD, Mustafa AS. Characterization of rpoB mutations in rifampin-resistant mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from the Middle East. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis Elsevier. 2000;38:227–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Ahmad S, Mokaddas E, Fares E. Characterization of rpoB mutations in rifampin-resistant clinical mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Kuwait and Dubai. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2002;44:245–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Ma X, Wang H, Deng Y, Liu Z, Xu Y, Pan X, et al. rpoB gene mutations and molecular characterization of rifampin-resistant mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Shandong Province, China. J. Clin. Microbiol. Am Soc Microbiol. 2006;44:3409–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Rosales-Klintz S, Jureen P, Zalutskayae A, Skrahina A, Xu B, Hu Y, et al. Drug resistance-related mutations in multidrug-resistant mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from diverse geographical regions. Int J mycobacteriology Elsevier. 2012;1:124–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Chaoui I, Atalhi N, Sabouni R, Akrim M, Abid M, Amzazi S, et al. Rifoligotyping assay: an alternative method for rapid detection of rifampicin resistance in mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Morocco. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip Taylor & Francis. 2014;28:1095–102.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. El Baghdadi J, Remus N, Laaboudi L, Benslimane A. Chronic cases of tuberculosis in Casablanca, Morocco. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung dis. 2003;7:660–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kourout M, Chaoui I, Sabouni R, Lahlou O, El Mzibri M, Jordaan A, et al. Molecular characterisation of rifampicin-resistant mycobacterium tuberculosis strains from Morocco [technical note]. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2009;13:1440–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Sabouni R, Kourout M, Chaoui I, Jordaan A, Akrim M, Victor TC, et al. Molecular analysis of multidrug resistantMycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Morocco. Ann Microbiol Springer. 2008;58:749–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Zakham F, Chaoui I, Echchaoui AH, Chetioui F, Elmessaoudi MD, Ennaji MM, et al. Direct sequencing for rapid detection of multidrug resistant mycobacterium tuberculosis strains in Morocco. J Infect Drug Resist. 2013;6:207–13.Google Scholar
  27. Chaoui I, Atalhi N, Sabouni R, Akrim M, Abid M, Amzazi S, et al. Rifoligotyping assay: an alternative method for rapid detection of rifampicin resistance in mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Morocco. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2014;28:1095–102.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Cavusoglu C, Hilmioglu S, Guneri S, Bilgic A. Characterization of rpoB mutations in rifampin-resistant clinical isolates of mycobacterium tuberculosis from Turkey by DNA sequencing and line probe assay. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:4435–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Hillemann D, Kubica T, Rüsch-Gerdes S, Niemann S. Disequilibrium in distribution of resistance mutations among mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing and non-Beijing strains isolated from patients in Germany. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49:1229–31.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Song K-S, Nimse SB, Kim HJ, Yang J, Kim T. Accurate detection of rifampicin-resistant mycobacterium tuberculosis strains. Sensors. 2016;16:376.View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Silva JL da, Leite GGS, Bastos GM, Lucas BC, Shinohara DK, Takinami JS, et al. Plasmid-based controls to detect rpoB mutations in mycobacterium tuberculosis by quantitative polymerase chain reaction-high-resolution melting. Mem{ó}rias do Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. SciELO Brasil; 2013;108:106–109.Google Scholar
  32. Anthwal D, Gupta R, Bhalla M. Direct Detection of Rifampin and Isoniazid Resistance in Sputum Samples from Tuberculosis Patients by High-Resolution Melt Curve Analysis. J. Clin. [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2017 Jul 9]; Available from: http://jcmasmorg/content/55/6/1755short/. Accessed 1 Aug 2017.
  33. Yadav R, Sethi S, Mewara A, Dhatwalia SK, Gupta D, Sharma M. Rapid detection of rifampicin, isoniazid and streptomycin resistance in mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates by high-resolution melting curve analysis. J Appl Microbiol. 2012;113:856–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Bentaleb EM, Abid M, El Messaoudi MD, Lakssir B, Amzazi S, Sefrioui H, et al. Development and evaluation of an in-house single step loop-mediated isothermal amplification (SS-LAMP) assay for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in sputum samples from Moroccan patients. BMC Infect. Dis. BioMed Central. 2016;16:517.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Bahrmand AR, Titov LP, Tasbiti AH, Yari S, Graviss EA. High-level rifampin resistance correlates with multiple mutations in the rpoB gene of pulmonary tuberculosis isolates from the Afghanistan border of Iran. J. Clin. Microbiol. Am Soc Microbiol. 2009;47:2744–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Ocheretina O, Escuyer VE, Mabou M-M, Royal-Mardi G, Collins S, Vilbrun SC, et al. Correlation between genotypic and phenotypic testing for resistance to rifampin in Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates in Haiti: investigation of cases with discrepant susceptibility results. PLoS One. Public Libr Sci. 2014;9:e90569.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Chen X, Kong F, Wang Q, Li C, Zhang J, Gilbert GL. Rapid detection of isoniazid, rifampin, and ofloxacin resistance in mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates using high-resolution melting analysis. J Clin Microbiol Am Soc Microbiol. 2011;49:3450–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Galarza M, Fasabi M, Levano KS, Castillo E, Barreda N, Rodriguez M, et al. High-resolution melting analysis for molecular detection of multidrug resistance tuberculosis in Peruvian isolates. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16:260.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Malhotra B, Goyal S, Bhargava S, Reddy PVJ, Chauhan A, Tiwari J. Rapid detection of rifampicin resistance in mycobacterium tuberculosis by high-resolution melting curve analysis. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung dis. 2015;19:1536–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Ramirez MV, Cowart KC, Campbell PJ, Morlock GP, Sikes D, Winchell JM, et al. Rapid detection of multidrug-resistant mycobacterium tuberculosis by use of real-time PCR and high-resolution melt analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:4003–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Yadav R, Sethi S, Mewara A, Dhatwalia SK, Gupta D, Sharma M. Rapid detection of rifampicin, isoniazid and streptomycin resistance in mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates by high-resolution melting curve analysis. J Appl Microbiol Wiley Online Library. 2012;113:856–62.Google Scholar
  42. Heep M, Rieger U, Beck D, Lehn N. Mutations in the beginning of the rpoBGene can induce resistance to Rifamycins in both helicobacter pylori and mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000;44:1075–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Taniguchi H, Aramaki H, Nikaido Y, Nakamura M, Koga T, Yoshida S. Rifampicin resistance and mutation of the rpoB gene in mycobacterium tuberculosis. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1996;144:103–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Ahmad S, Mokaddas E. The occurrence of rare rpoB mutations in rifampicin-resistant clinical mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from Kuwait. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2005;26:205–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Louw GE, Warren RM, Van Pittius NCG, McEvoy CRE, Van Helden PD, Victor TC. A balancing act: efflux/influx in mycobacterial drug resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother Am Soc Microbiol. 2009;53:3181–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Smith T, Wolff KA, Nguyen L. Molecular biology of drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Pathog. Mycobacterium Tuberc. its Interact. with Host Org. Spring. 2012:53–80.Google Scholar
  47. Sharma K, Modi M, Kaur H, Sharma A, Ray P, Varma S. rpoB gene high-resolution melt curve analysis: a rapid approach for diagnosis and screening of drug resistance in tuberculous meningitis. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2017 Jul 11];83:144–149. Available from: http://wwwncbinlmnihgov/pubmed/26254140/. Accessed 1 Aug 2017.

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement

BMC Infectious Diseases

ISSN: 1471-2334

Contact us