Skip to content


BMC Infectious Diseases

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

A new tool for tuberculosis vaccine screening: Ex vivo Mycobacterial Growth Inhibition Assay indicates BCG-mediated protection in a murine model of tuberculosis

  • Andrea Zelmer1Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
  • Rachel Tanner2,
  • Elena Stylianou2,
  • Timon Damelang1,
  • Sheldon Morris3,
  • Angelo Izzo4,
  • Ann Williams5,
  • Sally Sharpe5,
  • Ilaria Pepponi2, 6, 8,
  • Barry Walker7,
  • David A. Hokey7,
  • Helen McShane2,
  • Michael Brennan7 and
  • Helen Fletcher1
BMC Infectious DiseasesBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:412

Received: 8 March 2016

Accepted: 3 August 2016

Published: 12 August 2016



In the absence of a validated animal model and/or an immune correlate which predict vaccine-mediated protection, large-scale clinical trials are currently the only option to prove efficacy of new tuberculosis candidate vaccines. Tools to facilitate testing of new tuberculosis (TB) vaccines are therefore urgently needed.


We present here an optimized ex vivo mycobacterial growth inhibition assay (MGIA) using a murine Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection model. This assay assesses the combined ability of host immune cells to inhibit mycobacterial growth in response to vaccination. C57BL/6 mice were immunized with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) and growth inhibition of mycobacteria by splenocytes was assessed. Mice were also challenged with Mycobacterium tuberculosis Erdman, and bacterial burden was assessed in lungs and spleen.


Using the growth inhibition assay, we find a reduction in BCG CFU of 0.3–0.8 log10 after co-culture with murine splenocytes from BCG vaccinated versus naïve C57BL/6 mice. BCG vaccination in our hands led to a reduction in bacterial burden after challenge with Mycobacterium tuberculosis of approx. 0.7 log10 CFU in lung and approx. 1 log10 CFU in spleen. This effect was also seen when using Mycobacterium smegmatis as the target of growth inhibition. An increase in mycobacterial numbers was found when splenocytes from interferon gamma-deficient mice were used, compared to wild type controls, indicating that immune mechanisms may also be investigated using this assay.


We believe that the ex vivo mycobacterial growth inhibition assay could be a useful tool to help assess vaccine efficacy in future, alongside other established methods. It could also be a valuable tool for determination of underlying immune mechanisms.


MycobacteriaTuberculosisVaccinesGrowth inhibition assay


Tuberculosis (TB) is a world-wide public health problem and the biggest cause of death due to a single pathogen. It is estimated that in 2014, 9.6 million people developed the disease, and 1.5 million died from it [1]. Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) is the only available vaccine. It confers reliable protection against severe TB in infants and children, but its efficacy in adults is extremely variable (0–80 %), and a new vaccine is urgently needed to control the spread of the infection [2, 3]. Progress towards this goal has been slow. There are several reasons for this stagnation. Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) can persist in infected persons for years without causing disease or symptoms. Vaccine-mediated protection is therefore difficult to measure, resulting in a need for lengthy and costly clinical trials to establish vaccine efficacy. Additionally, only a handful of new vaccine candidates are currently under development, and funders have become more reluctant to provide large investments due to a risk of vaccine failure.

There is currently no validated immune correlate that predicts efficacy (such as antibody titres used for other infections) and this severely hampers the development and pre-clinical and clinical testing of TB vaccine candidates. Additionally, as highlighted by McShane and Williams [4] we do not have a single validated animal model for the screening of TB vaccine candidates, although head-to-head testing of TB vaccine candidates across a range of animal models can be reasonably used to demonstrate that vaccines are efficacious. Further, Henao-Tamayo et al. [5] argue that TB vaccines should be tested against different clinical isolates of Mtb, since the BCG Pasteur vaccine used in their study displayed varying levels of protection against different Mtb isolates in mouse and guinea pig models. A novel tool that would allow vaccine screening in different species may be more time- and cost-efficient than in vivo challenge experiments and could therefore help to accelerate vaccine development. The ability to test several different isolates or lineages of Mtb using cells from the same animal would reduce the number of animals needed, and the cost involved in these experiments.

Here, we present an optimized ex vivo mycobacterial growth inhibition assay (MGIA) for assessment of the summative vaccine-mediated host capacity to control mycobacterial growth. Several variations of mycobacterial growth inhibition assays have been described previously [69]. The assay described here involves direct co-culture of mouse splenocytes with mycobacteria, and subsequent measurement of mycobacterial growth inhibition. This particular variation of the assay has previously been shown to distinguish between naïve and immunized individuals in mice as well as humans by use of PBMC; however, the differences in mycobacterial burden between those two groups were small [10, 11]. To allow detection of a range of efficacies from different vaccine candidates, we aimed to achieve a difference of >0.5 log10 colony forming units (CFU) between BCG-naïve and BCG-immunized groups in our mouse model of TB. Our optimized assay produces a difference of up to 0.8 log10 CFU in our hands. Growth inhibition was also observed when using fast-growing Mycobacterium smegmatis (Msm) as the target bacteria in the MGIA. An in vivo challenge with the Mtb Erdman laboratory strain resulted in a ~0.7 log10 reduction in mycobacterial burden in the lungs and a 1 log10 reduction in the spleens of immunized animals, compared to unimmunized controls. We further demonstrate that an MGIA can show the importance of non-vaccine mediated interferon gamma (IFNγ)-dependent activity by using IFNγ-deficient (IFNγ-/-) mice. Collectively, our data suggest that MGIAs could be a promising tool for screening vaccine candidates pre-clinically, as well as determine the underlying immune mechanisms.



For immunization experiments, female C57BL/6 mice were acquired from Charles River UK at 5–7 weeks of age. Animals were acclimatized for at least 5 days before the start of any experimental procedure. Female B6.129S7-Ifng tm1Ts /J (IFNγ-/-) and C57BL/6 wild type (WT) controls bred in-house were used at 10–12 weeks of age. Group sizes of 5–6 mice were used as indicated throughout the manuscript.

Mycobacteria and culture conditions

BCG SSI and BCG Pasteur Aeras strains were obtained from Aeras (Rockville, MD, USA) as frozen aliquots. These were stored at -80 °C until needed. M. smegmatis was grown in 7H9 media with 10 % OADC, 0.5 % Glycerol and 0.05 % Tween80. At late log phase, bacteria were washed once with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) + 0.05 % Tween80, and resuspended in PBS + 10 % Glycerol. Aliquots were frozen and stored at -80 °C until needed.


Bacteria were thawed at room temperature and diluted to a final concentration of 2–5 × 106 CFU/ml in physiological saline solution for irrigation (Baxter Healthcare, Newbury, UK). Each animal received a subcutaneous injection of 100 μl BCG (immunized groups) or physiological saline solution (control groups) into the left or right leg flap. Animals were rested for 6 weeks (unless indicated otherwise) before an ex vivo mycobacterial growth inhibition assay or infection with M. tuberculosis was carried out.

Ex vivo Mycobacterial Growth Inhibition Assay (MGIA)

Six weeks after immunization (unless specified otherwise), spleens were removed aseptically and single cell suspensions of splenocytes isolated by mechanical disruption of spleens through a 100 μm cell strainer. After lysis of red blood cells, single cell suspensions containing the desired number of total splenocytes per 300 μl were made up in antibiotic-free media (RPMI-1640 (Sigma-Aldrich, Dorset, UK) + 10 % heat-inactivated FBS (Labtech International Ltd, Uckfield, UK) + 2 mM L-Glutamine (Fisher Scientific, Loughborough, UK), and 300 μl aliquots were added to 2 ml screw cap tubes (Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany). Mycobacteria were diluted in sufficient volume for all samples in the same media to a concentration of 90 to 3800 CFU per 300 μl as indicated for individual experiments. 300 μl aliquots of bacteria were added to the splenocytes, and the splenocyte-mycobacteria co-culture was then incubated on 360° tube rotators (VWR International, Lutterworth, UK) at 37 °C for 4 days.

After 4 days of incubation, the 2 ml screw cap tubes were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm in a bench-top microcentrifuge. The supernatants were removed (except 100 μl), and 400 μl of water was added to each tube to lyse host cells. The tubes were then vortexed briefly three times, with an incubation at room temperature for 5 min between each of the vortex steps. Each cell lysate (approx. 500 μl total) was then added to a MGIT tube (BD, Oxford, UK) and incubated in a BACTEC MGIT liquid culture system (BD) until registered positive.

To convert time to positivity (TTP) to bacterial numbers (CFU), a standard curve was used. To produce the standard curve, 500 μl of 10-fold dilutions of the mycobacterial strains were inoculated into the MGIT tubes, and TTP was plotted against CFU obtained from plating aliquots of the mycobacteria on 7H11 agar plates containing 10 % OADC supplement (Yorlab, York, UK) and 0.5 % glycerol. A linear regression analysis was carried out using GraphPad Prism version 6, and the resulting equation was used to convert TTP to CFU. Data are presented here as total number of CFUs per sample, as determined by use of a standard curve (Additional file 1: Figure S1). The difference between the medians of respective groups is described in the text and figures as Δ X log, and was calculated by subtracting the median of the test group (immunized or IFNγ-deficient mice) from the median of the control group (unimmunized or wild type mice).

Infection of mice with M. tuberculosis

Female C57BL/6 mice were infected intranasally with M. tuberculosis Erdman (BEI Resources, Manassas, VA, USA) 6 weeks after immunization and kept in isolators under BSL-3 containment. Frozen aliquots as received from BEI Resources were thawed at room temperature, and diluted in saline to a concentration of 1.4x104 CFU/ml. Mice were anaesthetized by an intraperitoneal injection of a combination of Ketamine (50 mg/kg; Ketalar, Pfizer Itd, Kent, UK) and Xylazine (10 mg/kg; Rompun; Berkshire, UK) in saline. Each animal then received 50 μl of the inoculum, estimated to contain 700 CFU. The number of bacteria in the inoculum was confirmed by plating aliquots on 7H11 agar plates containing 10 % OADC and 0.5 % glycerol.

Four weeks after infection, animals were killed by cervical dislocation. Lungs and spleens were removed aseptically and homogenized by mechanical disruption in sterile PBS. A series of 10-fold dilutions of tissue homogenates in PBS with 0.05 % Tween 80 were plated onto 7H11 agar plates with 10 % OADC supplement and 0.5 % glycerol. Plates were incubated at 37 °C and colonies counted after 3 weeks.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out using GraphPad Prism software Version 6 (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA, USA). The specific test used is indicated in each figure legend.


Comparison of BCG SSI and BCG Pasteur in an ex vivo MGIA

As a first step to maximize the difference in bacterial burden between BCG immunized and control groups in the MGIA, we investigated growth inhibition using two different BCG strains, BCG SSI and BCG Pasteur Aeras, an early passage strain of BCG Pasteur. Groups of 5 and 6 CB57BL/6 mice were immunized with BCG SSI and BCG Pasteur Aeras, respectively, or given saline as a control, and an ex vivo MGIA was carried out to assess mycobacterial growth inhibition of the same bacterial strains by host splenocytes at 4 or 6 weeks after immunization (Fig. 1). 1 × 106 cells and three different inocula of BCG were used for the MGIA as indicated in Fig. 1. The strongest growth inhibition of BCG SSI was found using 675 CFU. This led to a reduction of 0.121 log10 CFU in the immunized group as compared to the control group. No significant differences were found using 3800 CFU or 90 CFU (Fig. 1a). In contrast, using 100 CFU BCG Pasteur Aeras lead to a >1 log10 CFU reduction in bacterial numbers in the immunized group (Fig. 1b). Growth inhibition was also observed with higher inocula of BCG Pasteur Aeras, and although these were not statistically significant, the differences between immunized and control groups increased with lower inocula of BCG. Notably, significantly higher overall bacterial burdens were observed when a higher number of splenocytes (2 × 106) was used (Fig. 1a; 675 CFU, 1 × 106 vs 2 × 106 splenocytes). This was expected as BCG grows intracellularly in macrophages, and a higher overall number of splenocytes would provide more host cells for mycobacteria to grow in; however, we also observed a trend towards a greater effect on growth inhibition under these conditions (a reduction of 0.149 log10 CFU vs 0.121 log10 CFU).
Fig. 1

Ex vivo MGIA comparing growth inhibition conferred by BCG SSI and BCG Pasteur Aeras. a 1 × 106 splenocytes or 2 × 106 splenocytes from mice immunized with BCG SSI (grey circles) or given saline (open squares) were co-cultured with 3800, 675, or 90 CFU of BCG SSI. b 1 × 106 splenocytes from mice immunized with BCG Pasteur Aeras (grey circles) or given saline (open squares) were co-cultured with 2000, 500, or 100 CFU of BCG Pasteur Aeras. Splenocytes were obtained from a total of 5 immunized and 5 control animals (a) or a total of 6 immunized and 6 control animals (b). Aliquots from each spleen were cultured with different numbers of mycobacteria as indicated, and are represented by individual data points. Error bars represent the median +/- interquartile range. Statistical significance was tested using the unpaired t test function in GraphPad Prism

The number of target bacteria and the number of host cells both influence MGIA outcome

Based on these observations and in order to further improve assay conditions, we proceeded to titrate both the BCG Pasteur Aeras input inoculum (2000, 500, or 100 CFU) and the number of splenocytes used (1, 3, or 5 × 106; Fig. 2). Data shown in Fig. 1b are included for comparison. Significant growth inhibition in the immunized versus the control group was observed under several conditions, ranging from ~0.3 log10 to ~1.2 log10 difference between medians. Again, we observed more bacterial growth overall if more splenocytes were present, and we found that a lower BCG input inoculum and a higher number of splenocytes generally increased the growth inhibition effect in immunized groups. However, lower bacterial or splenocyte numbers also increased the variability within groups (measured as % Coefficient of Variation; Fig. 2d). We determined minimal conditions for vaccine candidate testing as delta >0.5 log CFU, CoV < 50 % and required sample size < 10 per group. These parameters were met by three of the conditions: 5 × 106 cells + 100 CFU; 5 × 106 cells + 500 CFU; and 3 × 106 cells + 500 CFU (indicated in bold script in Fig. 2d). Taking into account that the effect size was greatest using 5 × 106 splenocytes + 100 CFU, we determined this as the optimal condition using BCG Pasteur Aeras and C57BL/6 mice. Variability and reproducibility between experiments is a further important consideration. We have repeated the MGIA under these conditions on four independent occasions (Additional file 2: Figure S2a) and were able to detect significant differences ranging from 0.3–0.8 log10 CFU between immunized and unimmunized groups in three of those experiments. Pooling of data points from all experiments leads to a highly significant difference of 0.48 log10 CFU between immunized and control groups (Additional file 2: Figure S2b).
Fig. 2

Optimisation of the ex vivo MGIA using BCG Pasteur Aeras. a 1 × 106, 3 × 106, and 5 × 106 splenocytes (1 M, 3 M, and 5 M, respectively) from mice immunized with BCG Pasteur Aeras (grey circles) or given saline (open squares) were co-cultured with 2000 CFU (a), 500 CFU (b) or 100 CFU (c) of BCG Pasteur Aeras. Splenocytes were obtained from a total of 6 immunized and 6 control animals. Aliquots from each spleen were cultured with different numbers of mycobacteria as indicated, and are represented by individual data points. Error bars represent the median +/- interquartile range. Statistical significance was tested using the unpaired t test function in GraphPad Prism. d Analysis of variation of the data shown in a-c. *Sample sizes (alpha 0.05, power 0.8) were calculated using the mean values of BCG immunized and naïve groups and using the standard deviation of the BCG group (standard deviation was greater in the BCG groups than in the saline groups). **Optimal conditions for vaccine candidate testing determined as delta >0.5 log CFU, CoV < 50 % and required sample size < 10 per group. The analysis was carried out using STATA software

To assess how our ex vivo assay compares to an in vivo infection with virulent M. tuberculosis, groups of 6 C57BL/6 mice were immunized with BCG SSI, BCG Pasteur Aeras, or saline (control group), rested for 6 weeks, and then challenged with 700 CFU Mtb Erdman via the intranasal route. Bacterial burden in lungs (Fig. 3a) and spleens (Fig. 3b) was established 4 weeks after infection. We found that protection was conferred by both BCG strains, with a significant reduction of bacterial burden in the lung by 0.73 log10 CFU (BCG SSI) or 0.79 log10 CFU (BCG Pasteur Aeras), and in the spleen by 0.93 log10 CFU (BCG SSI) or 1.06 log10 CFU (BCG Pasteur Aeras), compared to control animals. There was no significant difference in bacterial burden in either lung or spleen between the two groups immunized with the different BCG strains.
Fig. 3

Protection conferred to infection with M. tuberculosis by BCG SSI and BCG Pasteur Aeras. Groups of 6 C57BL/6 mice were infected 6 weeks after immunization with BCG SSI (grey squares) or BCG Pateur Aeras (grey circles) via the intranasal route with 700 CFU M. tuberculosis Erdman. Control animals received saline at the time of immunization (open squares). CFUs per organ were determined 4 weeks after infection in lungs (a) and spleens (b). Each data point represents an individual animal. Error bars represent the median +/- interquartile range. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak correction for multiple comparisons using GraphPad Prism

BCG-immunized and control groups can be distinguished in an MGIA by using fast-growing Mycobacterium smegmatis

In an effort to further optimize the MGIA with regards to experiment time, the window between immunized and control groups, and ease of handling, we used the fast growing, non-pathogenic Mycobacterium smegmatis as the target bacteria for growth inhibition (Fig. 4). A difference of 0.7 log10 CFU was achieved between the two experimental groups (splenocytes from control mice or from BCG Pasteur Aeras immunized mice), which is equivalent to using BCG Pasteur Aeras. The overall bacterial burden was higher compared to BCG; however, based on the faster doubling time of Msm, this was expected. The overall experiment time was reduced by approx. 7 days.
Fig. 4

Ex vivo MGIA using M. smegmatis distinguishes between immunized and control animals. 5 × 106 splenocytes from mice immunized with BCG Pasteur Aeras (grey circles) or given saline (open squares) were co-cultured with 50 CFU of M. smegmatis 5 weeks after immunization. Splenocytes were obtained from 6 immunized and 6 control animals, each represented by an individual data point. Error bars represent the median +/- interquartile range. Statistical significance was tested using the unpaired t test function in GraphPad Prism

MGIA reflects non-vaccine mediated, interferon gamma-dependent responses that are important for control of mycobacterial growth

To characterize the assay and its potential for use in studies of immune mechanisms, we used splenocytes from interferon-gamma (IFNγ)-deficient C57BL/6 mice (IFNγ-/-) and assessed their ability to control mycobacterial growth ex vivo in comparison to splenocytes from wild type C57BL/6 mice. Here, the number of splenocytes (1, 2, or 3 × 106 cells) was titrated against two different BCG Pasteur Aeras inocula (750 CFU and 100 CFU; Fig. 5). The largest detectable difference was a 1 log10 increase in CFU in the IFNγ-/- splenocytes when using 1 × 106 cells and 750 CFU BCG; using 100 CFU, a 0.8 log10 difference in CFU was observed. This is in concordance with the crucial role of IFNγ in the control of mycobacterial growth in vivo demonstrated widely in the literature [1214]. Interestingly, the dynamics in this case are different from the vaccine-induced growth control described above (Figs. 1, 2, 3 and 4). An increase in the number of splenocytes led to a smaller difference between the two groups, whilst the opposite trend was observed when comparing splenocytes from immunized and unimmunized mice. Similarly, the higher bacterial inoculum led to overall larger differences between the groups, whilst the opposite was the case in the experiments above.
Fig. 5

Ex vivo MGIA reflects importance of IFNγ for growth control of mycobacteria. 1 × 106, 2 × 106, and 3 × 106 splenocytes from IFNγ-deficient (filled diamonds) or wild type mice (grey triangles) were co-cultured with 750 CFU (a) or 100 CFU (b) of BCG Pasteur Aeras. Splenocytes were obtained from a total of 5 IFNγ-deficient and 5 wild type animals. Aliquots from each spleen were cultured with different numbers of mycobacteria as indicated, and are represented by individual data points. Error bars represent the median +/- interquartile range. Statistical significance was tested using the unpaired t test function in GraphPad Prism


The first step towards optimization of an ex vivo mycobacterial growth inhibition assay for pre-clinical vaccine testing was to compare two different BCG strains, BCG SSI and BCG Pasteur Aeras (Fig. 1). We found that using BCG Pasteur Aeras as both the strain for immunization and the strain for assessment of ex vivo growth inhibition led to larger differences between immunized and control groups (Fig. 1b), compared to when BCG SSI was used as the MGIA inoculum and vaccine (Fig. 1a). Importantly, this assay assesses growth inhibition ex vivo, and thus provides a snapshot of the ability of the immune system to control mycobacterial growth at one specific time point. The effect of BCG sub-strains on the elicited host immune response and conferred protection has been investigated previously. Irwin and colleagues find differences after immunization of mice with 3 BCG sub-strains in the number of IFNγ-producing splenic and lung T cells [15]. However, this did not translate to differences in protection from an in vivo infection. Interestingly, the immune profile changes over time, but these changes were not translated to in vivo protection [16]. This is in accordance with our data, as no difference in lung or spleen bacterial burden was found after Mtb challenge in mice immunized with BCG Pasteur Aeras or BCG SSI (Fig. 3). The MGIA using BCG SSI was carried out 4 weeks after immunization, whilst the assay using BCG Pasteur Aeras was carried out 6 weeks after immunization (Fig. 1). It is possible that a difference in immune responses at different time points would be apparent in an ex vivo MGIA, which might contribute towards the differences seen in Fig. 1, but not after challenge in vivo. We observed a faster growth rate in vitro of BCG Pasteur Aeras compared to BCG SSI (data not shown). This could be an additional reason for the larger differences between control and immunized groups seen with this strain ex vivo, if faster growth of bacteria is found in the control groups with comparable growth inhibition in the immunized groups. The immune response to BCG immunization was not characterized here, and it is therefore difficult to conclude which factor is the main driver behind the observed differences. The MGIA at this stage is not meant to exactly reproduce in vivo effects, but is a step that provides additional information between assays determining immunogenicity and in vivo challenge models. As a better indication of immunization-mediated growth inhibition was seen using the faster growing BCG Pasteur Aeras, this strain was used for subsequent experiments.

We reasoned that vaccine-mediated growth inhibition would depend on the presence of mycobacterial antigen-specific T cells. As total splenocytes are used in this assay, the proportion of antigen specific T cells in the total population is not known, and the total number may be too low to have an effect on growth inhibition when using low numbers of splenocytes. Similarly, the ratio of monocytes to mycobacteria may influence the outcome as mycobacteria can survive in these cells. In order to maximize growth inhibition in immunized compared to control splenocytes, we investigated several combinations of total host cell numbers (1, 3, or 5 × 106) and inocula of BCG Pasteur Aeras (2000, 500, or 100 CFU; Fig. 2). This confirmed that a lower number of bacteria leads to a greater difference between the groups, regardless of the number of host cells. We also observed that a higher number of host cells increased the difference between groups. Overall, we determined that 5 × 106 splenocytes and 100 CFU result in a comparatively large and statistically significant difference between medians of 0.81 log10 CFU whilst variability is acceptable (Coefficient of Variation = 22.63 % in the BCG group; 8.06 % in the control group; Fig. 2d). A significant difference was detectable in three out of four independent experiments, indicating that some variability remains and that controls of BCG immunized and naïve animals should be included when testing experimental TB vaccine candidates (Additional file 2: Figure S2). Analysis of variance of the data shown in Fig. 2a-c suggests that sample sizes of 6–8 are required to achieve statistical power to detect an effect size of >0.5 log10 CFU. Therefore increasing group sizes from the numbers used here (5–6 per group) may increase overall reproducibility.

Using fast growing mycobacteria such as M. smegmatis also led to growth inhibition ex vivo after immunization with BCG Pasteur Aeras (Fig. 4). The effect size seen here was similar to the one found when using BCG Pasteur Aeras as the target bacteria. We argued that the faster growth rate of Msm would lead to a shorter study time, that the non-virulent nature of the bacteria would ease handling and allow this assay to be carried out in a wider range of laboratories, and that a faster growth rate may lead to an accentuation of the effect size of growth inhibition. The overall experiment time was reduced by approx. 7 days. However, we did not find more pronounced growth inhibition. This may be because the non-pathogenic nature of the bacteria does not allow it to grow proportionately faster intracellularly in cells from non-immunized mice, or there may not be enough shared antigens between the BCG strain used for immunization and the target of growth inhibition (Msm).

Importantly, both assays result in inhibition of mycobacterial growth by up to 0.7–0.8 log10 CFU. This is within the range of the reduction of bacterial burden seen in our own challenge with Mtb Erdman, where we found a reduction of approx. 0.7 log10 CFU in lungs and 1 log10 CFU in spleens of immunized animals (Fig. 3). Others have found varying degrees of reduction in bacterial burden depending on the Mtb challenge strain used (0.75–1.26 log10 CFU in lung, 0.48–1.32 log10 CFU in spleen) [17].

We did not carry out any assessment of ex vivo growth inhibition using Mtb as the target bacteria, and it is therefore uncertain how representative these conditions are of an infection with virulent Mtb. However, using a growth inhibition assay that involves co-culture of mycobacteria-infected bone marrow-derived macrophages with non-adherent splenocytes from mice vaccinated with different vaccines, Kolibab and colleagues show that in vitro growth inhibition of BCG correlates with in vitro growth inhibition of Mtb, as well as with in vivo challenge with Mtb [18]. We are presenting here a proof-of-concept study to enable further development of this assay. The advantage of using BCG as the target bacteria is that no specialized containment facilities are needed, making the MGIA much more accessible for a wide range of laboratories.

Using splenocytes from IFNγ-/- mice, we examined whether the MGIA can be used to assess the impact of immune factors such as IFNγ-dependent activity on growth control of mycobacteria. We found that splenocytes from IFNγ-/- mice are more permissive to mycobacterial growth than their WT counterparts (Fig. 5). This is in accordance with a wide array of literature describing the crucial role of IFNγ during tuberculosis [12, 13, 19, 20].

The main factor driving the outcome of the MGIA is currently unclear. However, given that the ex vivo MGIA directly assesses the summative ability of the host immune system to inhibit mycobacterial growth, the vaccine-mediated immune mechanism that underlies growth control does not need to be known a priori. In fact, this assay could help to determine underlying immune mechanisms of protection by investigating common factors in samples with efficient growth inhibition. As an ex vivo assay, it is also easily manipulated, for example by adding or depleting sub-populations of cells or cytokines. A further strength lies in the fact that several Mtb strains could be tested by using one single group of immunized mice and incubating aliquots of splenocytes with the different Mtb strains. This would significantly reduce the number of animals needed in comparison to in vivo challenge experiments, which need one group of animals for each Mtb strain to be tested – an ethical consideration that is regarded a priority within the UK research community. This approach may further allow the comparison of immune mechanisms elicited by the different strains.


We have taken several steps to optimize an existing mycobacterial growth inhibition assay in order to provide a potential tool that could help accelerate TB vaccine development. We titrated both host splenocyte numbers and bacterial inocula, and found three conditions that fulfill our criteria of delta >0.5 log CFU, Coefficient of Variance < 50 %, and required sample size < 10 per group (Fig. 2d). Whilst this is an improvement over the previously published 0.2 log10 CFU difference [11], variability and reproducibility could be further optimized. However, this assay could be useful in pre-clinical testing of vaccine candidates, as an intermediate step between immunogenicity testing and in vivo challenge experiments. It is both more rapid and economic than in vivo challenge experiments, and would also significantly reduce the potential harm experienced by the animals during such experiments. With an MGIA vaccine candidates could be screened in multiple doses, with different adjuvant formulations or against different lineages of Mtb before proceeding to in vivo efficacy testing. One of the strengths of this assay is its potential to be translated to other species, and therefore the possibility to test the same vaccine candidate in several animal models without the need for a pathogenic challenge experiment, or in humans.

The ex vivo MGIA is an important tool for the TB vaccine community and we encourage others to include this assay into their studies, and to contribute to the characterization and optimization of parameters will drive the development of the MGIA forward.


BCG, Bacillus Calmette-Guérin; CFU, colony forming unit; IFNγ, interferon gamma; MGIA, mycobacterial growth inhibition assay; Msm, Mycobacterium smegmatis; Mtb, Mycobacterium tuberculosis; PBS, phosphate buffered saline; TB, tuberculosis; TTP, time to positivity; WT, wild type



We are very grateful to Nathalie Cadieux and Megan Fitzpatrick (Aeras, Rockville) for provision of the BCG SSI and BCG Pasteur Aeras stocks. We would like to thank all staff at the Biological Services Facility at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine for their expert technical assistance.


Funding for this work was provided by Aeras and the European Union Horizon2020 program (TBVAC2020).

Availability of data and materials

Data will be shared upon request.

Authors’ contributions

Author contributions are listed under the following categories and against each author’s initials: Data acquisition (DAc); data analysis (DAn); study design (SD); manuscript written (MW); manuscript revision (MR). AZ – DAc, DAn, SD, MW, MR. RT – DAn, SD, MR. ES - DAn, SD, MR. TD – DAc, DAn, MR. SM – SD, MR. AI – SD, MR. AW – SD, MR. SS – SD, MR. IP – SD, MR. BW – SD, MR. DAH – SD, MR. HM – DAn, SD, MR. MB – DAn, SD, MR. HF – DAn, SD, MW, MR. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All animal work was carried out in accordance with the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 under a license granted by the UK Home Office (PPL 70/8043), and approved by the LSHTM Animal Welfare and Ethics Review Body.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
The Jenner Institute, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring, USA
Colorado State University, Fort Collins, USA
Public Health England, Porton Down, UK
Animal and Plant Health Agency, Weybridge, UK
Aeras, Rockville, USA
Translational Research Unit, National Institute for Infectious Diseasess “Lazzaro Spallanzani”, Rome, Italy


  1. World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Report 2015. World Health Organization. 2015.Google Scholar
  2. Colditz GA, Brewer TF, Berkey CS, Wilson ME, Burdick E, Fineberg HV, Mosteller F. Efficacy of BCG vaccine in the prevention of tuberculosis. Meta-analysis of the published literature. JAMA. 1994;271:698–702.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Mangtani P, Abubakar I, Ariti C, Beynon R, Pimpin L, Fine PEM, Rodrigues LC, Smith PG, Lipman M, Whiting PF, Sterne JA. Protection by BCG vaccine against tuberculosis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58:470–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. McShane H, Williams A. A review of preclinical animal models utilised for TB vaccine evaluation in the context of recent human efficacy data. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2014;94:105–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Henao-Tamayo M, Shanley CA, Verma D, Zilavy A, Stapleton MC, Furney SK, Podell B, Orme IM. The Efficacy of the BCG Vaccine against Newly Emerging Clinical Strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0136500.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Worku S, Hoft DF. In vitro measurement of protective mycobacterial immunity: antigen-specific expansion of T cells capable of inhibiting intracellular growth of bacille Calmette-Guérin. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;30 Suppl 3:S257–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Parra M, Yang AL, Lim J, Kolibab K, Derrick S, Cadieux N, Perera LP, Jacobs WR, Brennan M, Morris SL. Development of a murine mycobacterial growth inhibition assay for evaluating vaccines against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2009;16:1025–32.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Wallis RS, Palaci M, Vinhas S, Hise AG, Ribeiro FC, Landen K, Cheon SH, Song HY, Phillips M, Dietze R, Ellner JJ. A whole blood bactericidal assay for tuberculosis. J Infect Dis. 2001;183:1300–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Burl S, Holder BS, Lo BKM, Kampmann B. Optimisation of a functional mycobacterial growth-inhibition assay to improve its suitability for infant TB vaccine studies. - PubMed - NCBI. J Immunol Methods. 2013;394:121–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Fletcher HA, Tanner R, Wallis RS, Meyer J, Manjaly Z-R, Harris S, Satti I, Silver RF, Hoft D, Kampmann B, Walker KB, Dockrell HM, Fruth U, Barker L, Brennan MJ, McShane H. Inhibition of mycobacterial growth in vitro following primary but not secondary vaccination with Mycobacterium bovis BCG. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2013;20:1683–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Marsay L, Matsumiya M, Tanner R, Poyntz H, Griffiths KL, Stylianou E, Marsh PD, Williams A, Sharpe S, Fletcher H, McShane H. Mycobacterial growth inhibition in murine splenocytes as a surrogate for protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tb). Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2013;93:551–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Green AM, Difazio R, Flynn JL. IFN-γ from CD4 T cells is essential for host survival and enhances CD8 T cell function during Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. J Immunol. 2013;190:270–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Flynn JL, Chan J, Triebold KJ, Dalton DK, Stewart TA, Bloom BR. An essential role for interferon gamma in resistance to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. J Exp Med. 1993;178:2249–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cooper AM, Dalton DK, Stewart TA, Griffin JP, Russell DG, Orme IM. Disseminated tuberculosis in interferon gamma gene-disrupted mice. J Exp Med. 1993;178:2243–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Irwin SM, Goodyear A, Keyser A, Christensen R, Troudt JM, Taylor JL, Bohsali A, Briken V, Izzo AA. Immune response induced by three Mycobacterium bovis BCG substrains with diverse regions of deletion in a C57BL/6 mouse model. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2008;15:750–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Mittrücker H-W, Steinhoff U, Köhler A, Krause M, Lazar D, Mex P, Miekley D, Kaufmann SHE. Poor correlation between BCG vaccination-induced T cell responses and protection against tuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:12434–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Jeon BY, Derrick SC, Lim J, Kolibab K, Dheenadhayalan V, Yang AL, Kreiswirth B, Morris SL. Mycobacterium bovis BCG immunization induces protective immunity against nine different Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains in mice. Infect Immun. 2008;76:5173–80.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Kolibab K, Parra M, Yang AL, Perera LP, Derrick SC, Morris SL. A practical in vitro growth inhibition assay for the evaluation of TB vaccines. Vaccine. 2009;28:317–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Cooper AM. Cell-mediated immune responses in tuberculosis. Annu Rev Immunol. 2009;27:393–422.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. O’Garra A, Redford PS, McNab FW, Bloom CI, Wilkinson RJ, Berry MPR. The immune response in tuberculosis. Annu Rev Immunol. 2013;31:475–527.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s). 2016