Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Breakthrough viridans streptococcal bacteremia in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients receiving levofloxacin prophylaxis in a Japanese hospital

  • Muneyoshi Kimura1Email author,
  • Hideki Araoka1, 4,
  • Atsushi Yoshida2,
  • Hisashi Yamamoto3,
  • Masahiro Abe1,
  • Yuki Okamoto2,
  • Mitsuhiro Yuasa3,
  • Daisuke Kaji3,
  • Kosei Kageyama3,
  • Aya Nishida3,
  • Kazuya Ishiwata3,
  • Shinsuke Takagi3,
  • Go Yamamoto3,
  • Yuki Asano-Mori3,
  • Naoyuki Uchida3,
  • Akira Hishinuma2,
  • Koji Izutsu3,
  • Atsushi Wake3,
  • Shuichi Taniguchi3, 4 and
  • Akiko Yoneyama1, 4
BMC Infectious DiseasesBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:372

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1692-y

Received: 31 October 2015

Accepted: 5 July 2016

Published: 5 August 2016

Abstract

Background

Breakthrough viridans streptococcal bacteremia (VSB) in patients with hematological malignancy receiving levofloxacin prophylaxis is a major blood stream infection (BSI) occurring during febrile neutropenia. However, clinical data focused on VSB in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) recipients are lacking.

Methods

The medical records of allo-HSCT recipients who received oral levofloxacin prophylaxis between January 2011 and August 2013 at Toranomon Hospital were reviewed to evaluate breakthrough VSB. Stored viridans streptococcal (VGS) species were identified by using sodA gene sequencing, and were assessed for drug susceptibility.

Results

Among the 184 allo-HSCT recipients on levofloxacin prophylaxis, 28 (15.2 %) experienced breakthrough VSB. All of the 28 recipients with VSB were treated with a cefepime-based or piperacillin/tazobactam-based regimen. The susceptibility rates of the VGS strains for levofloxacin, cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem, and vancomycin were 0 %, 95 %, 100 %, 100 %, and 100 %, respectively. Both the MIC50 (minimum inhibitory concentration) and the MIC90 of ceftazidim (0.5 μg/mL and 2 μg/mL, respectively) were higher than the MIC90 of all the other anti-pseudomonal beta-lactams (APBLs). Only 1 VGS strain had a penicillin MIC ≥ 2 μg/mL by the Etest (3.6 %). There were no cases with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) that was associated with VSB, although the rate of viridans group streptococcal shock syndrome was high (26 %). The crude 30-day mortality rate in the VSB group (10.7 %) did not differ significantly from that in the BSI without VSB group (9.3 %) or non-BSI group (7.0 %) (P = 0.77). Also, VSB was not a risk factor for all-cause mortality up to 60 days following allo-HSCT (P = 0.43).

Conclusions

APBL with increased anti-VGS activity (APBL-VA) monotherapy would typically be optimal for treating the VGS strains in this setting. Indication of adding an empiric anti-gram-positive agent to APBL-VA for treating VSB should depend on local factors, such as the susceptibility results. In addition, breakthrough VSB is probably not a major cause of death in allo-HSCT settings, where beta-lactam non-susceptible VGS and the ARDS are rare.

Keywords

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantationFebrile neutropeniaLevofloxacin prophylaxisLevofloxacin breakthroughCeftazidimeViridans streptococcus

Background

Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis should be considered for high-risk patients with prolonged and profound neutropenia [1]. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) recipients are the primary constitutes of this high-risk group. Among them, breakthrough blood stream infection (BSI) on fluoroquinolone prophylaxis has been reported [25]. Some allo-HSCT recipients have also been reported to have breakthrough BSI on levofloxacin prophylaxis, and viridans group streptococcus (VGS) is one of the causative organisms [2, 3]. Additionally, VGS is a major causative organism of febrile neutropenia (FN) in cancer patients [610]. The 2010 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) FN guideline recognizes that anti-pseudomonal beta-lactam (APBL) antibiotics currently employed as empiric monotherapy in FN generally have good in vitro anti-VGS activity [1]. The APBLs with increased anti-VGS activity (APBL-VAs) recommended by the guideline are cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, and antipseudomonal carbapenems [1], and as such anti-gram-positive agents (AGPAs), including vancomycin, linezolid, or daptomycin, are not routinely recommended when viridans streptococcal bacteraemia (VSB) is suspected [1]. However, it is not clear whether this recommendation is optimal for all clinical settings, including the allo-HSCT setting. A recent report described that in vitro resistance to the APBL-VAs was observed in VGS isolates with a penicillin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) measured by Etest of ≥ 2 μg/mL [11]. Therefore, the clinical criteria that can assist with the targeted use of AGPAs only for the VSB that caused by VGS strains with penicillin MIC ≥ 2 μg/mL has been suggested [11]. On the other hand, some clinical centers choose prophylactic vancomycin for high-risk patients to prevent infection caused by gram-positive cocci such as VGS [12, 13]. A report from United States described that the mortality rate of VSB was 21.9 % and early administration of vancomycin was highly protective against VSB in the allo-HSCT setting [13]. However, the allo-HSCT recipients did not receive any prophylactic antimicrobial agents such as fluoroquinolone, and were initially treated by combination of ticarcillin/clavulanic acid and amikacin during neutropenia [13]. These findings may not extend to current allo-HSCT settings.

This is the first report to describe the characteristics of VSB and therapeutic strategies for the VSB in allo-HSCT recipients with FN who received levofloxacin prophylaxis in the era of APBL-VAs.

Methods

Study patients

A retrospective analysis of VSBs among allo-HSCT recipients (age, ≥16 years) who received standard prophylaxis with 500 mg/day oral levofloxacin was conducted between January 2011 and August 2013 at the Toranomon Hospital (890 beds; Tokyo, Japan). The medical and microbiological records of the recipients under levofloxacin prophylaxis during the study period were reviewed. Our standard strategy of levofloxacin prophylaxis for allo-HSCT recipients was introduced in January 2011 comprises following three major policies: (1) 500 mg/day oral levofloxacin prophylaxis started before day −7 (7 days before allo-HSCT); (2) levofloxacin prophylaxis stopped at the first episode of FN and changed to another antimicrobial regimen immediately after obtaining ≥ 2 sets of blood cultures; and (3) continuation of levofloxacin prophylaxis until neutrophil engraftment in the absence of any FN episodes. Neutrophil engraftment was defined as the first of 3 consecutive days with ANC (absolute neutrophil count) of ≥ 500cells/μL. A central venous access device was inserted before conditioning was started. All recipients received antifungal agents and acyclovir for prophylaxis. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was given from day −7 through day −2 for Pneumocystis prophylaxis. Urine, stool, nasal, and pharyngeal swabs were collected from each allo-HSCT recipient for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization screening within 3 months before allo-HSCT. Stool samples were also collected for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) colonization screening at the same time. All the cord blood transplant recipients received single cord blood during the study period.

This study was approved by the Human Ethics Review Committee of Toranomon Hospital.

Definitions

Breakthrough VSB was defined as the presence of at least a single positive result of blood culture for VGS in a sample drawn from a patient at the first episode of FN under levofloxacin prophylaxis. The definition of VSB was the same as the previous study in the allo-HSCT setting [13].

The definition of FN included criteria for body temperature and neutrophil count: Body temperature ≥ 37.5 °C measured at the axially fossa, according to routine practice in Japan [14]; and ANC <500 cells/μL or ANC that decreased to <500 cells/μL during the 48 h following the occurrence of fever [1].

For disease status, all hematological disorders were defined as either standard risk, or high risk [15]. Conditioning regimens were classified based on the report by the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research [16]. Myeloid malignancy contains acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), MDS overt AML, and chronic myelogenous leukemia. The recipients with prior history of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (PH-allo-HSCT) indicates the recipients who received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation 2 or more times. Coagulase negative staphylococci, Corynebacterium species, unidentified gram positive cocci, and unidentified gram positive cocci were considered contaminants unless they were cultured from ≥ 2 separate blood culture bottles. Co-infection was defined as the identification of ≥ 2 bacterial species in multiple blood culture bottles of samples collected within 24 h.

Hypotension, septic shock, and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) were defined as described previously [17, 18]. Refractory hypotension was defined as hypotension that was refractory to intravenous fluid therapy. VGS shock syndrome was defined as monobacteremia of viridans streptococcus (mono VSB) with refractory hypotension (patients who had VSB with co-infection were excluded). Invasive aspergillosis was defined as probable or proven invasive aspergillosis according to the EORTC-MSG criteria [19].

Initial antimicrobial regimen at the onset of levofloxacin breakthrough FN

Monotherapy with APBL-VA, as recommended by the IDSA guideline, is the routine empiric initial antimicrobial regimen administered at the onset of FN [1]. Clinicians could choose any of the APBL-VAs including cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, and meropenem. In our institution, AGPAs and amikacin were not routinely administered as a standard component of the empiric initial antimicrobial regimen for FN.

AGPAs should be combined with the APBL-VA regimen for specific clinical indications, including suspected catheter-related infection, skin or soft-tissue infection, or severe sepsis which caused by beta-lactam-resistant gram-positive organisms. Clinicians usually chose vancomycin as the first line AGPAs, except when the recipients were allergic to vancomycin. Amikacin could be combined with an APBL-VA regimen for suspected severe sepsis caused by beta-lactam-resistant gram-negative rod.

Identification of VGS and other organisms

Strains of VGS were initially identified from colony morphology and by hemolysis and the VITEK2 system (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France). Additionally, the stored VGS strains obtained from the blood samples between August 2011 and August 2013 were also identified to species level by examining the heterogeneity in streptococcal sod A gene sequences [20]. General identification of the other organisms that cultured from blood samples to species level was performed by VITEK2 (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France), or WalkAway 96 SI (Siemens Healthcare, Deerfield, IL, USA). Helicobacter cinaedi was identified by using gyrB-targeted PCR methods. Corynebacterium spp. was identified into species level by RapID CB Plus system (Remel, Lenexa, KS, USA).

Antimicrobial susceptibility

Drug susceptibility tests for levofloxacin, ceftazidime, cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem, and vancomycin were performed using microdilution methods by the Clinical Laboratory and Standards Institute (CLSI) at Dokkyo Medical University for the stored VGS strains obtained from the blood samples between August 2011 and August 2013 [21]. In addition, tests for penicillin were performed using Etest (bioMérieux, Durham, NC, USA) for all the VGS strains obtained at Toranomon Hospital during the entire study period. Drug susceptibility breakpoints in VGS species, as established by CLSI M100-S22, were used to categorize the MICs of the cultured VGS strains [21]. Susceptibility guidelines for VGS are not available for piperacillin/tazobactam; therefore, a cutoff MIC of 16/4 μg/mL was chosen on a previous report [11]. The breakpoint of ceftazidime has not been defined in the CLSI M100-S22 [21].

Outcome evaluation of the febrile neutropenia

An evaluation cohort (EC) was created to evaluate the clinical characteristics of breakthrough VSB as compared with other groups at the first episode of FN. Among all the study subjects, the allo-HSCT recipients who experienced FN were included into the EC; the recipients who successfully achieved neutrophil engraftment without FN and continued levofloxacin prophylaxis until neutrophil engraftment were excluded from the EC. The EC subjects were then divided into three groups: VSB group, consisting of recipients with VSB; BSI without VSB group, comprising the recipients with BSI where the causative organisms was not VGS; and the non-BSI group, comprising recipients without BSI at the first episode of FN. Recipients with contaminant organisms cultured from the blood samples included into non BSI group.

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were compared by the Fisher’s exact test. Continuous variables from the different three groups were compared by Kruskal-Wallis test. The 30-day mortality rates and the 60-day mortality rates after the onset of FN were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and the groups were compared using log-rank test. The incidence of VSB was estimated based on cumulative incidence curves. Competing event was febrile neutropenia that associated with non VSB causes. The groups were compared using Gray’s test. For the multivariate analysis, variables that P-values showed ≤ 0.10 were entered into the Fine-Gray proportional hazard model and sequentially eliminated in a stepwise backward fashion until the remaining variables were statistically significant. Log-rank test and proportional hazard model were used for pre-transplant variables and time dependent variables (VSB and engraftment within 30 days following allo-HSCT), respectively to identify the risk factors associated with 60 days overall mortality following allo-HSCT in the univariate analysis. For the multivariate analysis, valuables that P-values showed ≤ 0.10 were entered into the proportional hazard model and sequentially eliminated in a stepwise backward fashion until the remaining factors were statistically significant. Significance was set at α = .05. All statistical analysis was performed with EZR (Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University), which is a graphical user interface for R (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing) [22].

Results

Patient characteristics

Among the 184 allo-HSCT recipients who received the standard levofloxacin prophylaxis during the study period, 28 had breakthrough VSB. Twenty four of the 28 VGS strains (86 %) were cultured from ≥2 sets of blood culture bottles. The cumulative incidence of the VSB was 15.2 %. The characteristics of the 28 recipients are shown in Table 1. Among them, 22 received cord blood stem cell transplantation, 4 received related peripheral blood stem cell transplantation, and 2 received unrelated bone marrow transplantation.
Table 1

Clinical and microbiological characteristics of 28 breakthrough VSB cases

Characteristics

No.

Median age (range)

55 (20–71)

Gender

 

  Male

15 (53.6 %)

  Female

13 (46.4 %)

Hematological disorder

 

 Myeloid malignancy

 

  AML

3 (10.7 %)

  MDS overt AML

6 (21.4 %)

  MDS

8 (28.6 %)

  CML

1 (3.6 %)

 Lymphoid malignancy

 

  ALL

5 (17.9 %)

  NHL

1 (3.6 %)

  T-PLL

1 (3.6 %)

 Others

 

  Others

3 (10.7 %)

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

 

  CBT

22 (78.6 %)

  rPBSCT

4 (14.3 %)

  uBMT

2 (7.1 %)

Status of the patients

 

  Nosocomial infection

28 (100 %)

  Severe neutropenia (ANCs <100/pL )

28 (100 %)

  Receipt of beta-lactam in the previous 30 day

6 (21.4 %)

Clinical presentation

 

  Median body temperature (range) (°C)

38.6 (37.5-40.6)

  Acute respiratory distress syndrome

0

  Co-infection

9 (32.1 %)

Co-infectious pathogen

 

  Staphylococcus epidermidis

5

  Corynebacterium striatum

2

  Enterococcus faecium

1

  Rothia mucilaginosa

1

  Escherichia coli

1

Treatment

 

  Cefepime

26 (92.9 %)

  Piperacillin/tazobactam

2 (7.14 %)

  Empiric VCM administration

4 (14.3 %)

Clinical outcome

 

  Crude 30-day mortality

3 (10.7 %)

  Crude 60-day mortality

3 (10.7 %)

Clinical presentation of mono VSB

N = 19

  VGS shock syndrome

5 (26 %)

AML acute myeloid leukemia, MDS myelodysplastic syndrome, CML chronic myelogenous leukemia, ALL acute lymphoblastic leukemia, NHL non Hodgkin lymphoma, T-PLL T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia, SAA severe aplastic anemia, CBT cord blood transplantation , rPBSCT related peripheral blood cell transplantation, uBMT unrelated bone marrow transplantation, ANCs absolute neutrophil counts, VCM vancomycin, VSB viridans streptococcal bacteremia, VGS viridans group streptococcus

Microbiological characteristics of the breakthrough VSB

The clinical and microbiological characteristics of breakthrough VSB are shown in Table 1. All 28 VSBs occurred as nosocomial infections during severe neutropenia (ANCs ≤ 100/μL) before neutrophil engraftment (from 2 days before allo-HSCT to 8 days after allo-HSCT). Nine recipients had co-infections (32 %) caused by 10 organisms, which are listed in Table 1. Overall, 22 of the 28 VGS strains were obtained between August 2011 and August 2013 and stored; the remaining 6 VGS strains were obtained from January 2011 to July 2013 but not stored. Among the 22 stored VGS strains, the causative strains identified by sodA signature sequences were S. mitis (14 strains), S. oralis (4 strains), S. australis (1 strain), and S. infantis (1 strain); 2 strains could not be identified. Of these, only S. mitis is capable of causing VGS shock syndrome. Then, 5 of the 14 S. mitis (36 %) caused VGS shock syndrome.

The results of antimicrobial susceptibility tests for beta-lactam agents are shown in Table 2. Among the 22 stored VGS strains, the susceptibility rates for levofloxacin, cefepime, piperacillin/tazobactam, meropenem, and vancomycin were 0 %, 95 %, 100 %, 100 %, and 100 %, respectively. Both the MIC50 of ceftazidime and MIC90 of ceftazidime were higher than those of the APBL-VAs. Additionally, only 1 of the 28 VGS strains (3.6 %) had a penicillin MIC 2 μg/mL by Etest. The penicillin MICs for the remaining VGS strains were <2 μg/mL. The penicillin MICs for all the 6 VGS strains that cultured from blood samples obtained from the recipients who were exposed to a beta lactam in the previous 30 days (Table 1) were ranged from 0.03 to 0.25 μg/mL (<2 μg/mL) by Etest.
Table 2

Antimicrobial (beta lactam) susceptibility of the breakthrough viridans group streptococcal strains

        

No. of isolates at each MIC, mg/L

Antimicrobial agent

No. of isolates tested

Susceptible range mg/L

No. of the susceptible strains

Resistant range mg/L

No. of the resistant strains

MIC50, mg/L

MIC90, mg/L

≤0.03

0.06 ≤0.06; CFPM

0.12

0.25 ≤0.25; CAZ

0.5

1

2

4

8

16

Penicillin

28

≤0.12

22 (79 %)

>4

0

0.06

0.25

8

9

5

3

2

0

1

0

0

0

Ceftazidime

22

NA

NA

NA

NA

0.5

2

   

5

7

7

1

0

2

0

Cefepime

22

≤1

21 (95 %)

>4

0

0.12

0.25

 

9

7

4

0

1

1

0

0

0

Meropenem

22

≤0.5

22 (100 %)

>1

0

≤0.03

0.12

17

2

2

1

0

0

    
           

≤0.25/4

0.5/4

1/4

2/4

4/4

8/4

>16/4

Piperacillin/tazobactam

22

≤8/4

22 (100 %)

>16/4

0

≤0.25/4

≤0.25/4

   

21

1

0

0

0

0

0

MIC minimum inhibitory concentration, CFPM cefepime, CAZ ceftazidim, NA not available

Risk factors of the breakthrough VSB

To identify risk factors, the cumulative incidences of the VSB among each group were compared (Additional file.1). The recipients with the high risk hematological disorders tended to have the VSB more frequent than those with the standard risk (P = 0.11). However, no significant risk factors were identified by univariate analysis and multivariate analysis.

Therapeutic regimen

For empirical therapy, all 28 recipients received a cefepime-based regimen (26 recipients) or a piperacillin/tazobactam-based regimen (2 recipients) immediately after withdrawing levofloxacin prophylaxis at the first episode of FN. Four recipients received empirical vancomycin administration. None of the recipients received any empirical AGPA other than vancomycin.

Outcome of the breakthrough VSB in the evaluation cohort

Among 19 recipients with mono VSB, 5 had VGS shock syndrome (26 %). However, none of the recipients experienced ARDS. The crude 30-day mortality rate of the VSB was 10.7 %. All 6 recipients who had septic shock survived. In the 3 recipients who died, all the causative VGS strains were susceptible to penicillin (MIC ≤ 0.12 μg/mL).

Next, the characteristics and outcome of VSB in the EC were evaluated. The EC consisted of 182 recipients, since 2 recipients were excluded because they successfully achieved neutrophil engraftment without FN and continued levofloxacin prophylaxis until neutrophil engraftment. All the recipients were started on an APBL-VA-based regimen at the onset of FN instead of levofloxacin prophylaxis (Additional file.2). Thirteen recipients (7.1 %) received additional empiric vancomycin administration along with the APBL-based regimen. All the recipients in the EC were divided into the VSB group (28 patients), BSI without VSB group (54 patients), or non-BSI group (100 patients). Some minor differences were observed among the groups among the three groups (Additional file.2). The causative organisms in the BSI without VSB group are shown in Table 3. Among the 54 recipients in the BSI without VSB group, 5 had co-infections. At the onset of FN, 1 recipient had MRSA bacteremia and 1 had micafungin breakthrough fungemia caused by Trichosporon asahii; however, none of the recipients had VRE bacteremia or invasive aspergillosis. Clinicians ordered colonization screening tests for 165 of the 182 recipients in the EC (91 %). The rate of MRSA colonization and VRE colonization before transplantation were 3 % (5/165), and 0 % (0/165), respectively. The crude 30-day mortality rate after the onset of FN in the VSB group (10.7 %) was not significantly different from that in the BSI without VSB group (9.3 %) or the non-BSI group (7.0 %) (P = 0.77) (Fig. 1). Also, the crude 60-day mortality rate in the VSB group (10.7 %) was not significantly different from that in the BSI without VSB group (16.7 %) or the non-BSI group (14.0 %) (P = 0.81).
Table 3

Causative organisms in the BSI without VSB group as determined from blood cultures

 

No of strains

Gram positive cocci

 

 Coagulase negative staphylococcus

19

Enterococcus faecium

4

Enterococcus faecalis

2

 MRSA

1

Streptococcus agalactiae

1

 Unidentified GPC

2

Gram positive rods

 

Corynebacterium striatum

10

Corynebacterium jeikeium

1

Corynebacterium spp.

1

 Unidentified GPR

2

Gram negative rods

 

Escherichia coli

10

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

2

Klebsiella pneumoniae

1

Campylobacter spp.

1

Helicobacter cinaedi

1

Fungi

 

Trichosporon asahii

1

All the gram negative rods were resistant to levofloxacin except for Helicobacter cinaedi and Campylobacter spp. The standard drug susceptibility tests for Helicobacter cinaedi and Campylobacter spp. could not be performed in our institute

BSI blood stream infection, VSB viridans streptococcal bacteremia, GPC gram-positive coccus, GPR gram-positive rod

Figure 1
Fig. 1

The crude 30-day mortality after the onset of febrile neutropenia among the three groups

Risk factors for all-cause mortality up to 60 days following allo-HSCT

Engraftment within 30 days following allo-HSCT, high risk hematological diseases, and PH-allo-HSCT were associated with the outcome up to 60 days following allo-HSCT significantly in univariate analysis (Table 4). While, VSB was not identified as the risk factor for the mortality (P = 0.43). Then, engraftment within 30 days was the independent factor that improved the survival significantly (P = 0.0014) in the multivariate analysis (Table 4).
Table 4

Risk factor for all-cause mortality up to 60 days following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Univariate analysis

 Pre-transplant factors

Variables (Number)

Mortality (%)

P-value

  Gender

Male (119)

19.3

0.13

Female (65)

10.8

 

  Age

≥60 (80)

18.8

0.42

<60 (104)

14.4

 

  Diagnosis

Myeloid malignacy (119)

16.8

0.83

non Myeloid malignancy (65)

15.4

 

  Diseases risk

High risk hematological diseases (151)

19.2

0.028

Standard risk hematological diseases (33)

3.03

 

  PH of allo-HSCT

Yes (25)

32.0

0.017

No (159)

13.8

 

  Donor typre

CBT (135)

19.3

0.076

non CBT (49)

8.16

 

  Conditioning

RIC(63)

22.3

0.11

MAC (121)

13.2

 

 Time dependent factors

   

  Viridans streptococcal bacteremia

VSB (28)

10.7

0.43

non VSB (156)

17.3

 

  Engraftment within Day30

Yes (161)

9.94

<0.001

No (23)

60.9

 

Multivariate analysis

   

 Factors

Hazard ratio

95 % confidence interval

P-value

  High risk hematological diseases

5.59

0.741–42.18

0.095

  Prior history of allo-HSCT

2.09

0.919–4.740

0.079

  CBT

1.66

0.569–4.839

0.35

  Engraftment within Day30

0.22

0.087–0.558

0.0014

CBT cord blood transplantation, RIC reduced-intensity conditioning, MAC Myeloablative conditioning, allo-HSCT allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, VSB viridans streptococcal bacteremia, PH-allo-HSCT prior history of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Discussion

The high incidence of levofloxacin breakthrough VSB in this study (15.2 %) was comparable to that of the previous study conducted in autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplant setting (16.2 %) [6]. However, it was higher than those in other studies that described levofloxacin breakthrough BSI in allo-HSCT setting [2, 3]. Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis had been approved for approximately 10 years at our hospital (Tosufloxacin prophylaxis was used in our institute before January 2011 when the levofloxacin prophylaxis was started instead of tosufloxacin prophylaxis.). The long use of the fluoroquinolone prophylaxis might select VGS with diminished susceptibility to levofloxacin [6].

None of the 28 VGS strains assessed in this study were susceptible to levofloxacin; in contrast, none of the strains were resistant to penicillin based on the breakpoint of CLSI (penicillin MIC ≥ 4 μg/mL) [21]. This low penicillin resistant rate (0 %) was comparable to that reported in Finland (2.3 %) [23]. In addition, the penicillin MIC was 2 μg/mL for only 1 VGS strain, as assessed by Etest (Table 2). Therefore, based on a previous report, only 1 of the 28 VGS strains (3.6 %) was not considered to have good susceptibility to APBL-VAs [11]. This rate of 3.6 % for a penicillin MIC ≥ 2 μg/mL differs considerably from the rates observed in North America and Spain, which ranged from 17 % to 22 % [11, 24, 25]. Moreover, the susceptible rates of the APBL-VAs in this study were over 95 %. In contrast, in vitro inferiority of ceftazidime compared with the APBL-VAs was shown (Table 2). A similar result was reported in the previous study [24]. Accordingly, ceftazidime should probably not be administrated as a first line empirical therapeutic agent instead of the APBL-VAs when clinicians treat levofloxacin breakthrough FN in a setting, where breakthrough VSB is prevalent.

In the present study, 21 of the 24 recipients who did not receive empiric vancomycin administration at the first episode of FN were added vancomycin to APBL-VA-based regimen immediately after a gram-positive coccus was cultured from blood samples. This practice is recommended by the IDSA guideline [1]. However, according to the in vitro data described above, APBL-VA mono therapy was optimal for almost all the VGSs identified in our study. Thus, the empiric addition of vancomycin to APBL-VA-based regimen would not typically be needed for treating mono VSB in our setting, even when clinicians are awaiting the drug susceptibility results of VGS strains.

Nosocomial VSB and receipt of a beta lactam antimicrobial in the previous 30 days were reported to be the useful factors to predict VGS strains with a penicillin MIC ≥ 2 μg/mL in the previous study that conducted in the setting where beta-lactam non-susceptible VGS strains were prevalent [11]. However, the positive predicted values of them in the present study were only 3.7 % (1/28), and 0 % (0/6), respectively. Hence, the predictive factors in the previous study would probably lead to overuse of unnecessary empiric AGPAs administration in the settings where beta-lactam non-susceptible VGS strains were rare.

In this study, both the crude 30-day mortality rate and the crude 60-day mortality was 10.7 %. These were lower than those reported in previous studies in the allo-HSCT settings, which ranged from 21.9 to 24 % [13, 26]. In the previous study, seven of the 32 recipients with VSB (21.9 %) died, at median of 26 days (range, 12–36 days) from VSB diagnosed because of ARDS and multiorgan failure [13].

Further, both the crude 30-day mortality and the crude 60-day mortality after the onset of FN did not differ significantly from those in the other two groups in this study. Also, VSB was not a risk factor for all-cause mortality up to 60 days following allo-HSCT (Table 4). There was no VSB with ARDS in the present study, although 3 % to 33 % of VSB caused ARDS during neutropenia in the previous studies [7]. It was probably one of the reasons why the mortality of VSB in our study was lower. S. mitis cluster2 identified by multilocus sequence analysis is probably associated with ARDS because it was reported to be associated with unexplained pulmonary infiltrate during neutropenia [27]. There might be few S. mitis cluster2 among all the 28 VGS strains in our study. Additionally, the previous studies were not conducted in the era of APBL-VAs, which may be one of the reasons underlying the high mortality. However, the exact reasons for the difference are unclear since the drug susceptibility data from these studies are insufficient [13, 26]. In this context, breakthrough VSB is probably not a major cause of death in the present allo-HSCT setting, where beta-lactam non-susceptible VGSs and ARDS that associated with VSB are rare.

Some studies have recommended early or prophylactic vancomycin administration to prevent VSB [5, 12, 13]. However, considering our results, clinicians should be able to reduce that kind of AGPA administration in certain allo-HSCT settings, especially where beta-lactam non-susceptible VGS is not prevalent, such as Japan and Finland. Further epidemiological investigations regarding VSB in various settings, including allo-HSCT settings are needed.

Our study had some limitations. First, this study was a single-center retrospective study. However, prospective, multicenter, or randomized trials to clarify appropriate antimicrobial usage for BSIs occurred in allo-HSCT settings, such as VSB, are becoming increasingly rare. Second, 182 of the 184 recipients (99 %) who received levofloxacin prophylaxis had FN, although levofloxacin prophylaxis has been reported to be effective in reducing FN incidence [28]. Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis is an accepted protocol for neutropenic patients with hematological malignancy and severe neutropenia [1, 28, 29], although the limitations of fluoroquinolone prophylaxis are also recognized [1, 30]. Therefore, analyzing the impact of levofloxacin breakthrough infections is important for current allo-HSCT settings. Third, susceptibility tests for APBL-VAs could not be performed against all 28 VGS strains. However, among the 22 stored VGS strains analyzed in this study, the susceptibility rates for APBL-VAs were high (Table 2). According to these data and the results of a previous report, high susceptibility rates for APBL-VAs against all the 28 strains are highly probable [11]. Forth, the risk factor of the VSB was not identified. That might be because the number of the recipients was not enough. Among, 92 recipients who were checked their oral conditions and had the data regarding them, the cumulative incidence of the VSB in the recipients with mucositis (21.3 %) tended to be higher than that in the recipients without it (9.7 %) (P = 0.16). Mucositis might be identified as the significant risk factor, if all the recipients were checked their oral conditions.

Conclusions

In summary, the empiric addition of an AGPA, such as vancomycin to an APBL-VA-based regimen would not typically be needed for treating breakthrough VGS strains in this setting. The indication of adding an empiric AGPA to APBL-VA based regimen for treating VSB should depend on the local factors in each setting. In addition, breakthrough VSB is probably not a major cause of death in the allo-HSCT setting where the beta-lactam non-susceptible VGS strains and the ARDS that associated with VSB are rare.

Abbreviations

allo-HSCT, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant; BSI, blood stream infection; VGS, viridans group streptococcus; FN, febrile neutropenia; IDSA, Infectious Diseases Society of America; APBL, anti-pseudomonal beta-lactam; APBL-VAs, APBLs with increased anti-VGS activity; AGPAs, anti-gram-positive agents; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; VSB, viridans streptococcal bacteraemia; ANC, absolute neutrophil count; MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; VRE, vancomycin-resistant enterococci; AML, acute myeloid leukemia; MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome; PH-allo-HSCT, prior history of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; CLSI, Clinical Laboratory and Standards Institute; EC, evaluation cohort

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank the staff of the microbiology laboratory of Toranomon Hospital and Dokkyo Medical University Hospital for performing identification and drug susceptibility tests. We received helpful data regarding oral condition of the recipients from Dr Mieko Yoshimura.

Funding

None.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its additional files (Additional files 1 and 2).

Authors’ contributions

MK, HA and MA designed the study and collected data. MK, HA, HY and YA-M analyzed the clinical data. MK and HA wrote the manuscript. AtY, YO, and AH performed the identification and drug susceptibility testing for viridans streptococcal strains. MY, DK, KK, AN, KaI, ShiT, GY, NU, KoI, AW, ShuT, and AkY interpreted the results and reviewed the final draft of the manuscript. All authors read and revised the final manuscript before submission.

Authors’ information

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Human Ethics Review Committee of Toranomon Hospital. The committee approved this study without the need for written informed consent because the data lacked patient identifiers.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Infectious Diseases, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
(2)
Department of Infection Control and Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
(3)
Department of Hematology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
(4)
Okinaka Memorial Institute for Medical Research, Tokyo, Japan

References

  1. Freifeld AG, Bow EJ, Sepkowitz KA, Boeckh MJ, Ito JI, Mullen CA, et al. Clinical practice guideline for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer: 2010 update by the infectious disease society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(4):427–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Guthrie KA, Yong M, Frieze D, Corey L, Fredricks DN. The impact of a change in antibacterial prophylaxis from ceftazidime to levofloxacin in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2010;45(4):675–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Busca A, Cavecchia I, Locatelli F, D’Ardia S, De Rosa FG, Marmont F, et al. Blood stream infections after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: a single-center experience with the use of levofloxacin prophylaxis. Transpl Infect Dis. 2012;14(1):40–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Blennow O, Liunqman P, Sparrelid E, Mattsson J, Remberger M. Incidence, risk factors, and outcome of blood stream infections during the pre-engraftment phase in 512 allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantations. Transpl Infect Dis. 2014;16(1):106–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Seo SK, Xiao K, Haung YT, Jongwutiwes U, Chung D, Maloy M, et al. Impact of peri-transplant vancomycin and fluoroquinolone administration on rates of bacteremia in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients: A 12-year single institution study. J Infect. 2014;69(4):341–51.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Razonable RR, Litzow MR, Khaliq Y, Piper KE, Rouse MS, Patel R. Bacteremia due to viridans group streptococci with diminished susceptibility to levofloxacin among neutropenic patients receiving levofloxacin prophylaxis. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34(11):1469–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bochud PY, Calandra T, Francioli P. Bacteremia due to viridans streptococci in neutropenic patients: a review. American J Med. 1994;97(3):256–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Gassas A, Grant R, Richardson S, et al. Predictors of viridans streptococcal shock syndrome in bacteremic children with cancer and stem cell transplant recipients. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(7):1222–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Elting L, Bodey GP, Keefe BH. Septicemia and septic shock syndrome due to viridans streptococci: a case–control study of predisposing factors. Clin Infect Dis. 1992;14(6):1201–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Marron A, Carratala J, Gonzalez-Barca E, Fernandez-Sevilla A, Alcaide F, Gudiol F. Serious complications of bacteremia caused by viridans streptococci in neutropenic patients with cancer. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;31(5):1126–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Shelburne 3rd SA, Lasky RE, Sahasrabhojane P, Tarrand JT, Rolston KV. Development and validation of a clinical model to predict the presence of β-lactam resistance in viridans group streptococci causing bacteremia in neutropenic cancer patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;59(2):223–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Arms da Cunha C, Weisdorf D, Shu XO, DeFor T, Pastor 3rd JD, Jhonson JR. Early gram-positive bacteremia in BMT recipients: impact of three different approaches to antimicrobial prophylaxis. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1998;21(2):173–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Jaffe D, Jakubowski A, Sepkowitz K, Sebti R, Kiehn TE, Pamer E, et al. Prevention of peritransplantation viridans streptococcal bacteremia with early vancomycin administration: a single-center observational cohort study. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(11):1625–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Masaoka T. Evidence-based recommendations for antimicrobial use in febrile neutropenia in Japan: Executive Summary. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;15 Suppl 1:S49–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Yamamoto H, Uchida N, Matsuno N, Ota H, Kageyama K, Wada S, et al. Anti-HLA antibodies other than against HLA-A, B, DRB1 adversely affect engraftment and nonrelapse mortality in HLA-mismatched single cord blood transplantation: possible implications of unrecognized donor-specific antibodies. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014;20(10):1634–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Giral S, Ballen K, Rizzo D, Bacigalupo A, Horowitz M, Pasquini M, et al. Reduced-intensity conditioning regimen workshop: defining the dose spectrum. Report of a workshop convened by the center for international blood and marrow transplant research. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009;15(3):367–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(2):580–637.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Definition Task Force ARDS, Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA. 2012;307(23):2526–33.Google Scholar
  19. Walsh TJ, Donnelly JP, Stevens DA, Edwards JE, Calandra T, et al. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Revised difinitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infectious Cooperative Group and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46(12):1813–21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Hoshino T, Fujiwara T, Kilian M. Use of phylogenetic and phenotypic analyses to identify nonhemolytic streptococci isolated from bacteremic patients. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(12):6073–85.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Twenty-second informational supplement. Wayne: Document M100-S22 CLSI; 2012.Google Scholar
  22. Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available east-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48(3):452–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lindgren M, Jalava J, Rantakokko-Jalava K, Meurman O. In vitro susceptibility of viridans group streptococci isolated from blood in southwest Finland in 1993–2004. Scand J Infect Dis. 2007;39(6–7):508–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Paulus S, Dobson S, Rassekh S, Blondel-Hill E. In vitro inferiority of ceftazidime compared with other beta-lactams for viridans group Streptococcus bacteremia in pediatric oncology patients: implications for antibiotics choices. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2009;31(4):267–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Marron A, Carratala J, Alcaide F, Fernandez-Sevilla A, Gudiol F. High rates of resistance to cephalosporins among viridans-group streptococci causing bacteremia in neutropenic cancer patients. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2001;47(1):87–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Almyroudis NG, Fuller A, Jakubowski A. Pre- and post-engraftment bloodstream infection rates and associated mortality in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis. 2005;7(1):11–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Shelburn SA, Sahasrabhojane P, Saldana M, Yao H, Su X, Horstmann N, et al. Streptococcus mitis strains causing severe clinical diseases in cancer patients. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20(5):762–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Bucaneve G, Micozzi A, Menichetti F, Martino P, Dionisi MS, Martinelli G, et al. Levofloxacin to prevent bacterial infection in patients in patients with cancer and neutropenia. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(10):977–87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Gafter-Gvili A, Fraser A, Paul M, Leibovici L. Meta-analysis: antibiotic prophylaxis reduces mortality in neutropenic patients. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(12 Pt 1):979–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kern WV, Klose K, Jellen-Ritter AS, Oethinger M, Bohnert J, Kern P, et al. Fluoroquinolone resistance of Escherichia coli at a cancer center: epidemiologic evolution effects of discontinuing prophylactic fluoroquinolone use in neutropenoic patients with leukemia. Eur J Clin microbial Infect Dis. 2005;24(2):111–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement