Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Increase in non-tuberculous mycobacteria isolated from humans in Tuscany, Italy, from 2004 to 2014

BMC Infectious DiseasesBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:44

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1380-y

Received: 2 July 2015

Accepted: 25 January 2016

Published: 1 February 2016

Abstract

Background

In Italy, the prevalence of non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) in human infections is largely unknown. Herein, we report the epidemiology of NTM infections in a region of central Italy, Tuscany, over the last 11 years, and provide a review of the recent literature on NTM isolation rates in different geographic regions.

Methods

The complete collection of NTM strains isolated from a total of 42,055 clinical specimens at the Laboratory of Clinical Mycobacteriology of Pisa University Hospital, Italy, from 1 January 2004 to 31 December 2014 was included.

Results

In our setting, in the period 2004–2014 a total of 147 patients had cultures positive for NTM. The number of NTM isolates increased considerably from five isolates in 2004 to 29 in 2014; a sharp increase occurred in the last 3 years. Overall, 16 NTM species were isolated; the most common were M. avium, M. intracellulare and M. gordonae detected in respectively in 41.5, 14.3 and 11.6 % of NTM patients. In general, NTM isolates were largely prevalent in people older than 60 (57.8 %); patients aged 1–10 year-old almost exclusively yielded M. avium and M. intracellulare. Of the 147 NTM clinical isolates, 76.2 % were from respiratory specimens, 10.9 % from lymph nodes, 2.7 % from blood (yielding exclusively M. avium), and the remaining 10.2 % from other clinical specimens.

Conclusions

The observed increase in NTM isolation rate in our setting is in keeping with the general increase in NTM infections reported worldwide in the past two decades, although the distribution of the NTM prevalent species differs by geographic region.

Keywords

Non-tuberculous mycobacteria Human mycobacteriosis NTM Epidemiology

Background

Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) include all Mycobacterium species other than Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and Mycobacterium leprae. NTM are a group of over 150 enviromental species, but, due to recent advancement of molecular techniques, novel species are being identified [1]. NTM are generally endowed with low pathogenicity to humans [2], however some species are associated with a variety of human diseases, especially concomitantly to particular risk factors [3]; respiratory tract infections are the most frequent, followed by lymphadenitis in children, disseminated infections in severely immunocompromised patients and skin infections [4]. Although significant differences in geographic distribution of NTM have been observed [5], species belonging to Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC), particularly M. avium and M. intracellulare, are the most frequently reported; other important human NTM pathogens include slowly growing mycobacteria, usually community-acquired from environmental or animal sources, such as Mycobacterium kansasii, Mycobacterium xenopi, Mycobacterium malmoense, and rapidly growing mycobacteria typically hospital-acquired, such as Mycobacterium abscessus, Mycobacterium chelonae and Mycobacterium fortuitum. A considerable increase in both incidence and prevalence of NTM infections has been observed worldwide in the past two decades, not only for the development of new and more sensitive molecular methods for NTM identification, but also for a real increase in NTM disease cases [6]. Several European countries have published studies about NTM epidemiology showing an increase in NTM isolated from human clinical samples [79], however NTM epidemiology in Italy is largely unknown. The aim of the present survey is to provide an overview of the epidemiology and recent trend of NTM infections in a region of central Italy, Tuscany, over the last 11 years.

Methods

Clinical isolates

The survey include the complete collection of 147 NTM strains, isolated from the same number of patients, from a total of 42,055 clinical specimens at the Laboratory of Clinical Mycobacteriology of Pisa University Hospital, Italy, during an 11-year study period from 1 January 2004 to 31 December 2014. In the case of multiple consecutive positive cultures from the same patient, only the first isolate was included in the present study. All strains were isolated by using the BACTEC MGIT960 liquid culture system (Becton Dickinson, USA) and were identified by molecular probes (InnoLipa [Innogenetics, Belgium] and/or Genotype CM/AS [Hain Lifescience, Germany]) and by a multiplex PCR designed to discriminate MAC organisms [10]. Patients’ clinical information, including gender, age and site of infection, was obtained from clinical records; distinction between community-versus hospital-acquired infections was not possible.

Research ethics approval was not necessary for retrospective studies in our Institution; informed consent was not required as the data were analyzed anonymously.

Results and discussion

Between January 2004 and December 2014, a total of 42,055 clinical specimens collected from approximately 15,000 patients with suspected mycobacterial infection were tested; a total of 595 patients had cultures positive for mycobacteria; M. tuberculosis complex and NTM species were isolated from 448 (75.3 %) and 147 (24.7 %) patients, respectively. A total of 16 NTM species were isolated (Table 1), the most common belonging to the MAC (n = 82, 55.8 %); in particular, M. avium subsp. hominissuis was detected in 61 (41.5 %) and M. intracellulare in 21 (14.3 %) patients. M. gordonae was the third prevalent species (n = 17, 11.6 %), followed by M. xenopi (n = 14, 9.5 %), M. fortuitum (n = 10, 6.8 %), and M. kansasii (n = 7, 4.8 %). In general, the species distribution of NTM isolated in our setting was close to that reported earlier in an inventory study of NTM in the European Union, which included Italy [7]. Similarly to other studies [9, 11], the NTM infections were not associated with gender, although M. intracellulare and M. kansasii appeared to be more common in men (16 males vs 5 females, P = 0.002 for M. intracellulare; 6 males vs 1 females, P = 0.003 for M. kansasii, by χ2 analysis). In general, NTM isolates were largely prevalent in people older than 60 (n = 85, 57.8 %)¸ patients aged 1–10 year-old almost exclusively yielded M. avium and M. intracellulare (11 out of 12, 91.7 % in total), the most commonly encountered species in mycobacterial lymphadenitis in children [12]. Of the 147 NTM clinical strains, 112 (76.2 %) were isolated from respiratory tract specimens (sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage), 4 (2.7 %) from blood, 16 (10.9 %) from lymph nodes, and the remaining 15 isolates (10.2 %) from other specimens, including urine, stool, skin, gastric lavage and other body fluid. In particular, all the blood specimens yielded M. avium, which was also the prevalent species isolated from adenitis episodes; M. xenopi and M. kansasii were isolated only from pulmonary specimens; M. marinum was isolated exclusively from skin samples. These results reflect the ability of the mycobacterial species to infect and localize in different body sites [3].
Table 1

Species, patients’ age and site of infection of NTM isolated at the Clinical Mycobacteriology Laboratory of Pisa University Hospital during years 2004–2014

NTM species

No. of isolates (% of total isolates)

No. of isolates (% of species isolates)

Patient age range

Site of isolation

1–10

11–20

21–30

31–40

41–50

51–60

61–70

71–80

>80

Respiratory tract

Blood

Lymph node

Othera

M. avium

61 (41.5)

8 (13.1)

2 (3.3)

1 (1.6)

8 (13.1)

7 (11.5)

9 (14.8)

20 (32.8)

6 (9.8)

40 (65.6)

4 (6.6)

11 (18.0)

6 (9.8)

M. intracellulare

21 (14.3)

3 (14.3)

2 (9.5)

2 (9.5)

5 (23.8)

6 (28.6)

3 (14.3)

17 (81.0)

4 (19.0)

M. gordonae

17 (11.6)

3 (17.6)

4 (23.5)

2 (11.8)

3 (17.6)

4 (23.5)

1 (5.9)

14 (82.4)

3 (17.6)

M. xenopi

14 (9.5)

5 (35.7)

2 (14.3)

2 (14.3)

4 (28.6)

1 (7.1)

14 (100.0)

M. fortuitum

10 (6.8)

1 (10.0)

2 (20.0)

3 (30.0)

4 (40.0)

7 (70.0)

3 (30.0)

M. kansasii

7 (4.8)

1 (14.3)

1 (14.3)

4 (57.1)

1 (14.3)

7 (100.0)

M. celatum

3 (2.0)

1 (33.3)

1 (33.3)

1 (33.3)

2 (66.6)

1 (33.3)

M. abscessus

2 (1.4)

1 (50.0)

1 (50.0)

1 (50.0)

1 (50.0)

M. chelonae

2 (1.4)

1 (50.0)

1 (50.0)

2 (100.0)

M. marinum

2 (1.4)

2 (100.0)

2 (100.0)

M. lentiflavum

2 (1.4)

2 (100.0)

2 (100.0)

M. simiae

2 (1.4)

1 (50.0)

1 (50.0)

2 (100.0)

M. scrofulaceum

1 (0.7)

––

1 (100.0)

1 (100.0)

M. triplex

1 (0.7)

1 (100.0)

1 (100.0)

M. phocaicum

1 (0.7)

1 (100.0)

1 (100.0)

M. bolletii

1 (0.7)

1 (100.0)

1 (100.0)

Total

147 (100.0)

12 (8.2)

2 (1.4)

2 (1.4)

11 (7.5)

18 (12.2)

17 (11.6)

31 (21.1)

40 (27.2)

14 (9.5)

112 (76.2)

4 (2.7)

16 (10.9)

15 (10.2)

ainclude isolates from urine, stool, skin, gastric lavage and other body fluids

The distribution over time of the NTM isolates is reported in Fig. 1. As shown, the number of NTM isolates increased considerably from five isolates in 2004 to 29 in 2014; a sharp increase occurred in the last 3 years. In 2014, in particular, M. avium and M. intracellulare were the prevalent isolates representing 58.6 % of total NTM isolates; the increase in MAC isolates occurred mostly in people aged over 60 with pulmonary infections, as also reported by others [9, 13, 14]. Notably, M. kansasii, a pulmonary pathogen not reported before 2012 in our setting, was repeatedly isolated in the last 3 years, representing 9.6 % of total NTM isolates; M. gordonae, which is considered a non-pathogenic enviromental contaminant, was the third most frequently isolated species.
Fig. 1

NTM isolated at the Clinical Mycobacteriology Laboratory of Pisa University Hospital during years 2004–2014. Only the six prevalent species, out of the 16 isolated during the survey period, are individually reported with different column fillings; the other NTM species (M. celatum, M. abscessus, M. chelonae, M. marinum, M. lentiflavum, M. simiae, M. scrofulaceum, M. triplex, M. phocaicum and M. bolletii) are grouped together (see figure legend at the right side)

On the whole, the increase in isolation rate of NTM in our setting in recent years is in keeping with several reports all over the world [79, 11, 1519]. However, it is worthy to note that the distribution of the species of NTM isolated from clinical specimens differs markedly by geographic region. Table 2 summarizes a selection of the recent literature reporting NTM isolation rates in different settings and geographic regions. In Europe, M. avium and M. intracellulare were the most common species, reaching prevalence rates approximately as high as 40–60 % in Italy, United Kingdom and the Netherlands. Interestingly, in the United Kingdom, although M. avium-intracellulare, M. malmoense and M. kansasii were the prevalent species, the rise in NTM isolates was mostly due to M. gordonae generally isolated from pulmonary specimens in patients over 60 year-old [9, 13]; similarly, in a study from Croatia, the highest increase in NTM isolation frequency was attributed to M. gordonae and M. fortuitum [11]; also studies from the Netherlands and Athens (Greece) showed high rates of M. gordonae isolates [14, 20]. In the United States the prevalent NTM species were M. avium complex, M. gordonae and M. abscessus [21, 22], while in Eastern Asia the most frequent were M. avium complex, M. kansasii and M. abscessus and M. fortuitum [2325].
Table 2

Recent studies on isolation rates of NTM from human clinical specimens in different settings

Setting

Years

Prevalent NTM species

% of total isolates

Trend

Reference

Tuscany (Italy)

2004–2014

M. avium

41.5

Increase

This study

M. intracellulare

14.3

M. gordonae

11.6

England, Wales and Northern Ireland

1995–2006

M. avium-intracellulare

42.9

Increase

9

M. malmoense

13.7

M. kansasii

12.5

Scotland

2000–2010

M. avium complex

48.1

No clear trend

13

M. malmoense

17.7

M. abscessus

9.8

The Netherlands

2000–2006

M. avium complex

39.0

Increase

14

M. gordonae

14.1

M. kansasii

7.4

Croatia

2006–2010

M. gordonae

42.9

Increase

11

M. xenopi

15.5

M. fortuitum

11.5

Athens (Greece)

2007–2013

M. gordonae

13.9

No trend

20

M. avium

13.1

M. fortuitum

12.2

Virginia (USA)

2001–2009

M. avium complex

40.9

Increase

22

M. gordonae

28.7

M. abscessus

4.5

Oregon (USA)

2007–2012

M. avium-intracellulare

86

Increase

21

M. chelonae/abscessus

6

Shangai (China)

2008–2012

M. kansasii

45.0

Increase

23

M. intracellulare

20.8

M. chelonae/abscessus

14.9

Cheonan (Korea)

2005–2011

M. intracellulare

51.3

Increase

24

M. avium

14.7

M. kansasii

7.8

South Korea

2001–2011

M. avium complex

53

Increase

25

M. abscessus-massiliense

25

M. fortuitum

6

Conclusions

In conclusion, the present study, although not representing a population-based investigation, shows an increase in NTM isolation rate in our setting, which is consistent with the increasing rates seen elsewhere, and provides a snapshot of the prevalent NTM species in our setting. The clinical significance of the increased isolation rate of NTM from human specimens observed in the present study remains largely unknown for the difficulties to interpret whether the NTM isolations are related to colonisation or disease. Further studies involving detailed clinical data are needed to better understand the changes in NTM epidemiology.

Declarations

Acknowledgment

This work was financially supported by the University of Pisa, Grant “Fondi di Ateneo, 2013-2014”.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Dipartimento di Ricerca Traslazionale e delle Nuove Tecnologie in Medicina e Chirurgia, Università di Pisa

References

  1. Tortoli E. Impact of genotypic studies on mycobacterial taxonomy: the new mycobacteria of the 1990s. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2003;162:319–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Griffith DE, Aksamit T, Brown-Elliott BA, Catanzaro A, Daley C, Gordin F, et al. An official ATS/IDSA statement: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;175:367–416.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Tortoli E. Clinical manifestations of nontuberculous mycobacteria infections. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009;15:906–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. van Ingen J. Diagnosis of nontuberculous mycobacterial infections. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;34:103–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Hoefsloot W, van Ingen J, Andrejak C, Angeby K, Bauriaud R, Bemer P, et al. The geographic diversity of nontuberculous mycobacteria isolated from pulmonary samples: an NTM-NET collaborative study. Eur Respir J. 2013;42:1604–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Behr MA, Falkinham 3rd JO. Molecular epidemiology of nontuberculous mycobacteria. Future Microbiol. 2009;4:1009–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. van der Werf MJ, Ködmön C, Katalinić-Janković V, Kummik T, Soini H, Richter E, et al. Inventory study of non-tuberculous mycobacteria in the European Union. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:62.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ringshausen FC, Apel RM, Bange FC, de Roux A, Pletz MW, Rademacher J, et al. Burden and trends of hospitalisations associated with pulmonary non-tuberculous mycobacterial infections in Germany, 2005–2011. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:231.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Moore JE, Kruijshaar ME, Ormerod LP, Drobniewski F, Abubakar I. Increasing reports of non-tuberculous mycobacteria in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, 1995–2006. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:612.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Shin SJ, Lee BS, Koh WJ, Manning EJ, Anklam K, Sreevatsan S, et al. Efficient differentiation of Mycobacterium avium complex species and subspecies by use of five-target multiplex PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:4057–62.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Jankovic M, Samarzija M, Sabol I, Jakopovic M, Katalinic Jankovic V, et al. Geographical distribution and clinical relevance of non-tuberculous mycobacteria in Croatia. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2013;17:836–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Eriksson M, Bennet R, Danielsson N. Non-tuberculous mycobacterial lymphadenitis in healthy children: another lifestyle disease? Acta Paediatr. 2001;90:1340–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Russell CD, Claxton P, Doig C, Seagar AL, Rayner A, Laurenson IF. Non-tuberculous mycobacteria: a retrospective review of Scottish isolates from 2000 to 2010. Thorax. 2014;69:593–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. van Ingen J, Hoefsloot W, Dekhuijzen PN, Boeree MJ, van Soolingen D. The changing pattern of clinical Mycobacterium avium isolation in the Netherlands. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2010;14:1176–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Chien JY, Lai CC, Sheng WH, Yu CJ, Hsueh PR. Pulmonary infection and colonization with nontuberculous mycobacteria, Taiwan, 2000–2012. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20:1382–5.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Marras TK, Mendelson D, Marchand-Austin A, May K, Jamieson FB. Pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacterial disease, Ontario, Canada, 1998–2010. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19:1889–91.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Prevots DR, Shaw PA, Strickland D, Jackson LA, Raebel MA, Blosky MA, et al. Nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease prevalence at four integrated health care delivery systems. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182:970–6.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Billinger ME, Olivier KN, Viboud C, de Oca RM, Steiner C, Holland SM, et al. Nontuberculous mycobacteria-associated lung disease in hospitalized persons, United States, 1998–2005. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:1562–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Martín-Casabona N, Bahrmand AR, Bennedsen J, Thomsen VO, Curcio M, Fauville-Dufaux M, et al. Non-tuberculous mycobacteria: patterns of isolation. A multi-country retrospective survey. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2004;8:1186–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Panagiotou M, Papaioannou AI, Kostikas K, Paraskeua M, Velentza E, Kanellopoulou M, et al. The epidemiology of pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacteria: data from a general hospital in Athens, Greece, 2007–2013. Pulm Med. 2014;2014:894976.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Henkle E, Hedberg K, Schafer S, Novosad S, Winthrop KL. Population-based incidence of pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacterial disease in Oregon 2007 to 2012. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015;12:642–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Satyanarayana G, Heysell SK, Scully KW, Houpt ER. Mycobacterial infections in a large Virginia hospital, 2001–2009. BMC Infect Dis. 2011;11:113.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Wu J, Zhang Y, Li J, Lin S, Wang L, Jiang Y, et al. Increase in nontuberculous mycobacteria isolated in Shanghai, China: results from a population-based study. PLoS One. 2014;9:e109736.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kim JK, Rheem I. Identification and distribution of nontuberculous mycobacteria from 2005 to 2011 in cheonan, Korea. Tuberc Respir Dis. 2013;74:215–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Koh WJ, Chang B, Jeong BH, Jeon K, Kim SY, Lee NY, et al. Increasing recovery of nontuberculous mycobacteria from respiratory specimens over a 10-year period in a tertiary referral hospital in South Korea. Tuberc Respir Dis. 2013;75:199–204.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Rindi and Garzelli. 2016