Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Clinical and molecular characteristics of invasive community-acquired Staphylococcus aureusinfections in Chinese children

  • Yanhong Qiao1, 2,
  • Xue Ning1,
  • Qiang Chen3,
  • Ruizhen Zhao4,
  • Wenqi Song1,
  • Yuejie Zheng4,
  • Fang Dong1,
  • Shipeng Li1,
  • Juan Li1,
  • Lijuan Wang1,
  • Ting Zeng1,
  • Yanhong Dong1,
  • Kaihu Yao1,
  • Sangjie Yu1,
  • Yonghong Yang1 and
  • Xuzhuang Shen1Email author
BMC Infectious Diseases201414:582

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-014-0582-4

Received: 6 June 2014

Accepted: 23 October 2014

Published: 7 November 2014

Abstract

Background

This study aims to investigate the clinical features of invasive community-acquired Staphylococcus aureus (CA-SA) infection in Chinese children and analyze its molecular features.

Methods

Clinical data and invasive CA-SA isolates were prospectively collected. Pediatric risk of mortality (PRISM) score was used for disease severity measurement. Molecular typing was then performed, followed by expression analysis for virulence genes.

Results

Among 163 invasive CA-SA infection cases, 71 (43.6%) were methicillin-resistant SA (MRSA) infections and 92 (56.4%) were methicillin-susceptible SA (MSSA). A total of 105 (64.4%) children were younger than 1 year old, and 79.7% (129/163) were under 3 years age. Thirteen kinds of diseases were observed, in which bacteremia and pneumonia accounted for 65.6% (107/163) and 52.8% (86/163), respectively. A total of 112 (68.1%) patients had two or more infective sites simultaneously, and four cases (2.5%) died. CA-MSSA more frequently caused multi-sites infections, bacteremia, and musculoskeletal infection than MRSA. A total of 25 sequence types (STs) were detected. MRSA mainly comprised ST59 (49/71, 69%), whereas the most frequent clonotypes were ST88 (15/92, 16.3%), ST25 (13/92, 14.1%), ST7 (13/92, 14.1%), ST2155 (12/92, 13%), and ST188 (9/92, 9.8%) for MSSA. Seven STs were common to both MSSA and MRSA groups. No differences in clinical presentation or PRISM score were found between the two groups or among different ST. The expression levels of the four known virulence genes varied among the six main ST clones.

Conclusions

Invasive CA-SA infections were characterized by high incidence and multi-site infections in young children in China. The clinical manifestations of CA-MSSA were more frequently associated with multi-site infections, bacteremia and musculoskeletal infection than those of CA-MRSA. Isolated genotypes may be relevant to the expressions of virulence genes, but not to clinical manifestations.

Keywords

Staphylococcus aureus Community-acquired Invasive infection Child Molecular epidemiology

Background

Staphylococcus aureus (SA) causes a multitude of human infections around the world [1]. In the past decade, an increase in the community-acquired SA (CA-SA) infection rate, accompanied by a decreased incidence of hospital-acquired SA (HA-SA) infections, has been observed [2]-[4].

In 2005, Gonzalez reported 14 children with severe CA-SA infections, 13 of which experienced bacteremia and bone-joint complications simultaneously and 3 died [5]. Since 1999 four deaths caused by severe invasive community-acquired methicillin-resistant SA (CA-MRSA) were observed in America, and many serious infections caused by CA-MRSA have been reported [6]. In Cunnington’s study, eight children with serious invasive community-acquired methicillin-susceptible SA (CA-MSSA) infection were reported and their clinical manifestations were clearly described [7]. Several studies have reported invasive infections, but few of large scale studies on the clinical characteristics of invasive CA-SA infections have been performed.

As the subjective simplification of the physiological stability index, the simplified acute physiology (SAP) score is a widely used general severity scoring system used in European intensive care medicine for adult patients [8]. The pediatric risk of mortality (PRISM) score has been developed and validated in several centers in the United States in pediatric patients [9]-[11]. It was reported that the PRISM score could directly reflect the severity of the disease, and has been widely used for predicting patients’ death or survival, as reported in Portugal in 2005, the United Kingdom and Senegal in 2006, and India in 2010 [12]-[15].

Regional differences may exist in the distribution of invasive CA-MRSA isolates. For example, ST93 and ST1 are the common types in Australia [16], whereas ST8 (USA300) is common in America [17] and France [18]. In Switzerland, ST5 accounted for the majority of invasive CA-MRSA isolates [19]. Our previous study also revealed that ST59 was the dominant clone in children from the mainland of China, which was in agreement with the results reported by Taiwan [20]. However, no dominant clone has been detected yet for invasive MSSA isolates throughout the world [21],[22].

Previous studies have indicated that virulence genes may play an important role in serious SA infections [7],[22],[23]. Although various virulence genes have been reported, core genome-encoded toxins, including hemolysin-a genes (hla), a-type phenol-soluble modulins (psmα) and RNAIII, have been detected in almost all SA isolates [24]. Panton–Valentine leukocidin (pvl) was initially considered as an important virulence factor in SA; however, the role of pvl in the pathogenicity of SA is still under debate [25]. Compelling evidence has revealed an association between virulence gene expression and pathogenicity in animal model. For example a study in the US showed high expression levels of core genome-encoded virulence genes contributed to the high virulence of isolate USA300 in rats [26]. However, information on the relationship between virulence gene expression and clinical manifestations in patients with invasive SA infections is still lacking [27]. A correlation has also been reported between molecular type and virulence gene expression [28],[29].

In the current study, we used the PRISM III score to evaluate disease severity, described the clinical and molecular characteristics of CA-SA, and detected the expression of the hla, psmα, RNA III and pvl genes. Virulence gene expression and clinical manifestations and virulence gene expressions were then compared between invasive CA-MRSA and CA-MSSA isolates, followed by an investigation into the relationship between molecular characteristics and disease severity. The findings contribute to our understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms involved in invasive SA infections.

Methods

Definitions

“Community-acquired infections” are infections that are either present or incubating on admission and associated with the first positive culture result obtained within 48 h of admission [29]. Individuals with the following “high-risk” factors were excluded from the study: receiving continuous hemodialysis, receiving chemotherapy, dependent on an indwelling catheter, needing an intravenous line or percutaneous device when culturing [15].

Invasive SA refers to SA isolated from a normally sterile body site [17]. Subjects were excluded from this classification if they had positive culture results but did not show clinically relevant infective signs [17]. Staphylococcal pneumonia, necrotizing pneumonia and musculoskeletal infection were defined as described previously [20]. Patients with pneumonia were excluded if the SA isolates were recovered from the sputum. Patients with orbital infections were excluded if the SA isolates were recovered from the swabs of the eye or ear secretion only [30]. Severe pneumonia diagnosis should meet at least one of the following requirements: (1) admission to an intensive care unit; (2) necrotizing or cavitary infiltrates; and (3) empyema. Patients that did not meet one of these requirements were classified into the moderate pneumonia group [31]. Necrotizing fasciitis was diagnosed based on a surgical report, as confirmed by pathological examination [32]. Any patient who showed SA infections involving skin or soft tissue structures was categorized under skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI).

Patients and data collection

Patients (≤14 years old) with invasive CA-SA infections were prospectively recruited from three regional Children’s hospitals between December 2011 and February 2013. Clinical data, such as general demographic information, clinical features, laboratory results, potential risk factors and treatment, were retrieved from the medical records department. PRISM III [11] was used to measure disease severity; all patients were scored based on PRISM within 24 h of admission. This study was approved by the Ethics Committees of the three Children’s hospitals in Beijing, Shenzhen and Jiangxi. A parent or guardian of each patient provided written informed consent.

Molecular typing and screening of the key virulence genes

All isolates were sent to the Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Beijing Children’s Hospital for SA identification. Only the first isolated strain from a normally sterile body site was evaluated.

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification was used for multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and staphylococcal protein A (SPA) typing. Three core genome-encoded toxin genes, including hla, and psmα and the regulator RNAIII, were screened by PCR [33]; pvl gene was also detected as described previously [33].

Quantitative analysis of gene expression

For RNA isolation, overnight cultures were diluted 1:100 in 10 mL of tryptic soy broth (TSB) and incubated at 37°C with shaking at 180 rpm until stationary growth phase (OD600 ≥ 2.0). No observable differences in the growth rates were found for the SA strains in TSB. The harvested cell aliquots were pelleted by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm at −4°C for 5 min. Each pellet was washed once in an equal volume of Tris–HCl and EDTA buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl and 1 mM EDTA, pH 8), followed by re-suspension in TE buffer containing 10 g/L lysozyme and 40 mg/L lysostaphin. The mixture was then incubated at 37°C for 15 min. Total bacterial RNA was isolated using RNAiso (Takara, Japan) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. Contaminated DNA was removed by incubating the total bacterial RNA with RNase-free DNase I (30 U/100 μg of total RNA, Takara) at 37°C for 1 h. Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized using the PrimeScript RT reagent kit (Takara) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. The amounts of RNA and cDNA were quantitated using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA).

Real-time PCR was performed using SYBR Premix Ex Taq™ (Takara), and the primers were designed and synthesized according to a previous study [28]. The comparative Ct (2-ΔΔCT) method was used to quantify the expression of the genes selected, with the expression of MRSA isolate USA300 being used as a reference. Alterations in gene expression were expressed as the fold change relative to the reference; all of the reactions were performed in triplicate, and the gyrB gene was used as an endogenous control [33].

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were analyzed using the Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. Mann–Whitney U analysis was used to compare PRISM scores between MRSA and MSSA groups. Gene expression values were normalized by log10 transformation, then analyzed by performing the Student’s t test to compare MRSA and MSSA strains. One-way analysis of variance with Dunnett’s multiple comparison was used for the PRISM score and expression level analysis among different ST or SPA types. Differences were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05. All analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 18.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago IL, USA).

Results

Demographics of the patients

A total of 163 children (99 males and 64 females; mean age, 2.4 years) were enrolled in this study. Approximately 66.3% (108/163) of the patients were less than 1 year old and 79.8% (130/163) were under 3 years old. Seventy-one patients (43.6%) suffered from MRSA infection, while 92 (56.4%) patients manifested MSSA infection. A significantly higher proportion of patients with related risk factors was observed in the MRSA group than in the MSSA group (χ 2 = 11.499, df =1, p =0.001). No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of age, origin, fever duration and other factors (Table 1). A total of 120 cases (73.6%) yielded PRISM scores of less than 4.0, and 20 cases (12.3%) yielded PRISM scores higher than 8.0. The Mann–Whitney U analysis revealed no significant difference in the PRISM scores between MRSA and MSSA groups (Z = −0.706, p = 0.48).
Table 1

Demographics and clinical characteristics of patients with invasive SA infections

Characteristics

Total No. (%)

MRSA No. (%)

MSSA No. (%)

P

Patients

163

71 (43.6)

92 (56.4)

1.0

Gender

    

Male

99 (60.7)

37 (52.1)

62 (67.4)

0.048

Female

64 (39.3)

34 (47.9)

30 (32.6)

 

Age-Median (month, IQRa)

6 (35.23)

8 (35.33)

6 (32.75)

0.397

 <=1 mo

51 (31.3)

20 (28.1)

31 (33.7)

0.451

1 mo–1 yr

54 (33.1)

26 (36.6)

28 (30.4)

0.593

1 yr–3 yr

25 (15.3)

15 (21.2)

10 (10.9)

0.072

3 yr–14 yr

33 (20.3)

10 (14.1)

23 (25)

0.086

Area

    

Rural

90 (55.2)

38 (53.5)

52 (56.5)

0.702

Urban

73 (44.8)

33 (46.5)

40 (43.5)

 

Risk factors b :

33 (20.2)

23 (32.4)

10 (10.9)

0.001

history in the past 1 yr of

    

 Hospitalization

21

16

5

0.001

 Surgery

6

3

3

0.336

 Trauma or scalds

3

1

2

0.212

 Endotracheal intubation

4

3

1

1.0

Congenital heart disease

4

2

2

0.567

Other congenital diseasesc

3

2

1

1.00

Presenting symptoms

    

 Fever

134 (82.2)

60 (84.5)

74 (80.4)

0.5

 Hypothermia

4 (2.5)

2 (2.8)

2 (2.2)

1.00

 Fever days-Median (IQR)

5.5 (7)

6.5 (7)

5 (6)

0.76

 Shock

4 (2.5)

2 (2.8)

2 (2.2)

1.00

 Coma

2 (1.2)

1 (1.4)

1 (1.1)

1.00

Laboratory examination

    

White cell count-Median (109/L IQR)

17.35 (8.47)

18.71 (9.41)

16.41 (9.52)

0.72

Neutrophil count-Median (IQR)

10.46 (7.37)

11.58 (6.44)

10.74 (7.18)

0.81

Thrombocytopenia (<100 × 109/L)

12 (7.4)

5 (7)

7 (7.6)

0.89

C-reactive protein-Median (mg/L, IQR)

47.9 (19.5)

46.7 (21.3)

48.5 (19.3)

0.92

PRISM score Median (IQR)

2 (6)

2 (6)

2 (6)

0.48

Hospitalization

    

hospital days-median (IQR)

15 (7)

17 (8)

14.5 (7)

0.168

Intensive care unit (ICU) admission

76 (46.6)

34 (47.9)

42 (45.7)

0.777

ICU days-Median (IQR)

9 (4)

8 (5)

9.5 (4)

0.786

Notes: MRSA: methicillin-resistant S. aureus; MSSA: methicillin-susceptible S. aureus; PRISM: pediatric risk of mortality.

aInterquartile range.

bNot mutually exclusive.

cOne MRSA case each of congenital immunodeficiency and congenital laryngeal cyst and one MSSA case of thalassemia.

Clinical diagnosis

Table 2 lists the disease spectrum of patients with invasive SA infection. Bacteremia (65%), pneumonia (52.8%) and musculoskeletal infection (19.6%) were the most frequent diseases. The proportion of patients with bacteremia or musculoskeletal infection caused by MSSA was significantly higher than that caused by MRSA (χ 2 = 13.696, df =1, and p = 0.000 for bacteremia; χ 2 = 5.578, df = 1, and p = 0.018 for musculoskeletal infection). Fifty-one cases (31.3%) were found to have single-site infections; among which, pneumonia (45.1%) and bacteremia (29.4%) were the most common symptoms. In total, 112 patients (68.7%) showed two or more infective sites simultaneously, in which 25.9% had bacteremia and pneumonia, and 19.6% had SSTI. A significantly higher proportion of patients with multi-site infections was observed in the MSSA group compared with the MRSA group (χ 2 = 5.344, df =1, and p = 0.021). Patients with pneumonia complicated with MRSA-instigated SSTI were higher in proportion than patients with SSTI caused by MSSA (χ 2 = 10.57, df =1, and p = 0.001). The proportion of patients displaying pneumonia alone was higher in the MRSA group than in the MSSA group (χ 2 = 7.82, df = 1, and p = 0.005, Table 2).
Table 2

Clinical characteristics of children with invasive S. aureus infections

Characteristics

Total n =163 N (%)

MRSA n =71 N (%)

MSSA n = 92 N (%)

P

Infection sites a

    

Bacteremia

107 (65.6)

34 (47.9)

73 (79.3)

0.000

Pneumonia

86 (52.8)

43 (60.6)

43 (46.7)

0.08

Severe pneumonia

72 (83.7)

38 (88.4)

34 (79.1)

0.243

 Necrotizing pneumonia

16 (18.6)

8 (18.6)

8 (18.6)

1.0

Moderate pneumonia

14 (16.3)

5 (11.6)

9 (20.9)

0.243

Musculoskeletal infection

32 (19.6)

8 (11.3)

24 (26.1)

0.018

 Osteomyelitis

27 (84.3)

8 (100)

19 (79.2)

0.29

 Arthritis

15 (46.9)

3 (37.5)

17 (70.8)

0.116

 Pyomyositis

10 (31.2)

4 (50)

6 (25)

1.0

 Necrotizing fasciitis

8 (25)

2 (25)

6 (25)

1.0

Meningitis

7 (3.7)

3 (4.2)

4 (4.3)

1.0

Endocarditis

3 (1.8)

2 (2.8)

1 (1.1)

0.82

Orbital abscess

4 (2.5)

4 (5.6)

0

0.073

Deep-seated abscess

4 (2.5)

1 (1.4)

3 (3.3)

0.805

Othersb

6 (3.6)

4 (5.6)

2 (2.2)

0.457

Clinical diagnosis

    

Single-site infections

51 (31.3)

29 (40.8)

22 (23.9)

0.021

Pneumonia

23 (45.1)

18 (62.1)

5 (22.7)

0.005

Bacteremia

15 (29.4)

6 (20.7)

9 (40.9)

0.117

Musculoskeletal infection

7 (13.7)

2 (6.9)

5 (22.7)

0.224

Othersc

6 (11.8)

3 (10.3)

3 (13.6)

1.0

Multi-site infections

112 (68.7)

42 (59.2)

70 (76.1)

0.021

Two infection sites

87 (77.7)

35 (49.3)

52 (74.3)

0.266

Bacteremia + SSTI

22 (19.6)

10 (23.8)

12 (17.1)

0.39

Bacteremia + Pneumonia

29 (25.9)

7 (16.7)

22 (31.4)

0.084

 Bacteremia-related Pneumonia

16 (14.3)

3 (7.1)

13 (18.6)

0.094

 Pneumonia-related Bacteremia

13 (11.6)

4 (9.5)

9 (12.9)

0.594

Bacteremia + Musculoskeletal infection

12 (10.7)

2 (4.8)

10 (14.3)

0.207

Pneumonia + SSTI

10 (8.9)

9 (21.4)

1 (1.4)

0.001

Othersd

14 (12.5)

7 (16.7)

7 (10)

0.302

The infection sites ≥3

25 (22.3)

7 (16.7)

18 (25.7)

0.266

Bacteremia + Pneumonia + SSTI

12 (10.7)

2 (4.8)

10 (14.3)

0.207

Otherse

13 (11.6)

5 (11.9)

8 (11.4)

1.00

MRSA: methicillin-resistant S. aureus; MSSA: methicillin-susceptible S. aureus; SSTI: skin and soft tissue infections.

aNot mutually exclusive.

bOne MRSA case each of lymphadenitis, peritonitis, hepatapostema, and appendiceal abscess and one MSSA case each of peritonitis and hydrocele complicated with infection.

cOne MRSA case each of appendiceal abscess, deep-seated abscess, and orbital abscess and three MSSA cases of deep-seated abscess.

dTwo MRSA cases of bacteremia + orbital abscess, one MRSA case each of pneumonia + musculoskeletal infection, pneumonia + meningitis, pneumonia + peritonitis, pneumonia + hepatapostema, and musculoskeletal infection + SSTI; three MSSA cases of musculoskeletal infection + SSTI; one MSSA case each of pneumonia + meningitis, bacteremia + peritonitis, endocarditis + meningitis, and bacteremia + hydrocele complicated with infection.

eOne MRSA case each of bacteremia + meningitis + endocarditis, bacteremia + pneumonia + lymphadenitis, pneumonia + musculoskeletal infection + endocarditis, bacteremia + pneumonia + orbital abscess + meningitis, and bacteremia + pneumonia + musculoskeletal infection + SSTI; four MSSA cases of bacteremia + musculoskeletal infection + SSTI; two cases of bacteremia + pneumonia + meningitis + SSTI; one MSSA case each of bacteremia + pneumonia + musculoskeletal infection and bacteremia + pneumonia + musculoskeletal infection + SSTI.

Treatment and follow-up

Additional file 1: Table S1 shows information relating to the medication and surgical treatment received by patients. The proportion of susceptible antibiotics used in prior empirical therapy was significantly lower in the MRSA group than in the MSSA group (χ 2 = 13.49, df =1, and p = 0.000). No difference was observed between the MRSA and MSSA groups in the proportion of patients requiring surgical treatment (χ 2 = 1.824, df =1, and p = 0.117).

In total, four patients died because of infection-related diseases during hospitalization; among which, three were newborn babies with bacteremia complicated with pneumonia. The remaining case suffered from MRSA bacteremia and meningitis complicated with endocarditis.

MLST and SPA typing

A total of 25 STs were detected. MRSA strains showed 11 ST, in which 69% were ST59. Nineteen ST, including two new ST (ST2760 and ST2771), were detected in the MSSA strains. The five most dominant STs in MSSA were ST88 (15/92, 16.3%), ST25 (13/92, 14.1%), ST7 (13/92, 14.1%), ST2155 (12/92, 13%) and ST188 (9/92, 9.8%). Seven ST were observed in both MRSA and MSSA, among which the most frequent ST were ST59, ST88, ST25, ST7, ST2155 and ST188, detected in 119 strains (73%).

The MRSA strains displayed 21 SPA types, among which t437 (42/71, 59.2%) and t441 (4/71, 5.6%) were the most frequent. Forty-three SPA types, including three new types (t12861, t12862, and t16824), were found in the MSSA isolates, with the most frequent being t091 (10/92, 10.9%), t189 (8/92, 8.7%) and t078 (6/92, 6.5%). MRSA and MSSA isolates both displayed ST59-t437, ST188-t189, ST5-t002, and ST965-t062 types (see Additional file 2: Table S2).

MLST typing and disease

Among the 51 ST59-SA isolates, 20 strains (39.2%) led to single-site infections, including 12 (23.5%) pneumonia only, 5 (9.8%) bacteremia, and 2 (3.9%) musculoskeletal infections. A total of 31 strains (60.8%) were found to cause multi-site infections, including 8 (15.7%) bacteremia complicated with SSTI and 7 (13.7%) pneumonia complicated with SSTI. Among the 20 ST88-SA isolates, 14 (70%) resulted in multi-site infections, among which 8 cases exhibited bacteremia complicated with pneumonia or musculoskeletal infection. More than half of the ST25, ST7, ST2155 and ST188 isolates were associated with multi-site infections (Table 3). Fisher analysis showed no significant difference in the distribution of infective sites between the MRSA and MSSA strains in ST59, ST88 and ST188 type strains. No differences were observed in the infective site number and infection type (bacteremia, pneumonia, and musculoskeletal infection) among the various ST. No difference was found in the PRISM scores among the various STs and SPA types (Figure 1).
Table 3

Clinical characteristics of children with invasive infections caused by the common MLST-type S. aureus strains

Clinical syndrome

ST59

ST88

ST25

ST7

ST2155

ST188

(n = 51)

(n = 20)

(n = 13)

(n = 13)

n = 12

n = 10

MRSA

MSSA

MRSA

MSSA

MSSA

MSSA

MSSA

MRSA

MSSA

(n = 49)

(n = 2)

(n = 5)

(n = 15)

(n = 13)

(n = 13)

(n = 12)

(n = 1)

(n = 9)

Single-site infection

Total

20(39.2)

0

1(5)

5(25)

4(30.8)

5(38.5)

6(50)

1(100)

2(22.2)

Bacteremia

5(9.8)

0

0

2(10)

2(15.4)

3(23.1)

1(8.3)

1(100)

1(11.1)

Pneumonia

12(23.5)

0

1(5)

2(10)

1(7.7)

1(7.7)

3(25)

0

0

Musculoskeletal infection

2(3.9)

0

0

1(5)

0

1(7.7)

2(16.7)

0

1(11.1)

Others

1a(2)

0

0

0

1b(7.7)

0

0

0

0

Multi-site infections

Total

29(56.9)

2(3.9)

4(20)

10(50)

9(69.2)

8(61.5)

6(50)

0

7(77.8)

B + P

4(7.8)

0

2(10)

2(10)

2(15.4)

3(23.1)

1(8.3)

0

3(33.3)

B + M

1(2)

0

1(5)

3(15)

3(23.1)

1(7.7)

2(16.7)

0

1(11.1)

B + S

8(15.7)

0

1(5)

3(15)

2(15.4)

0

3(25)

0

1(11.1)

P + S

7(13.7)

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

B + P + S

2(3.9)

1(2)

0

1(5)

1(7.7)

1(7.7)

0

0

0

Others

7c(13.7)

1d(2)

0

1e(5)

1f(7.7)

3g(23.1)

0

0

2h(22.2)

Notes: B + P, bacteremia + pneumonia; B + M, bacteremia + musculoskeletal infection; B + S, bacteremia + skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI); P + S, pneumonia + SSTI; B + P + S, bacteremia + pneumonia + SSTI.

aOne case of orbital abscess.

bOne case of deep-seated abscess.

cTwo cases of bacteremia + orbital abscess, one case each of bacteremia + pneumonia + musculoskeletal infection, musculoskeletal infection + SSTI, bacteremia + pneumonia + lymphadenitis, bacteremia + pneumonia + osteomyelitis + SSTI, and pneumonia + osteomyelitis + endocarditis.

dOne case of bacteremia + pneumonia + musculoskeletal infection + SSTI.

eOne case of bacteremia + musculoskeletal infection + SSTI.

fOne case of musculoskeletal infection + SSTI.

gTwo cases of bacteremia + pneumonia + meningitis and one case of pneumonia + meningitis.

hOne case each of bacteremia + pneumonia + musculoskeletal infection and meningitis + endocarditis.

Figure 1

Differences in PRISM scores between different MLST-type isolates and different Staphylococcus protein A (SPA)-type isolates. Differences in PRISM score between different MLST-type and SPA-type groups are not statistically significant (one-way ANOVA test). Note: ST59 only had two MSSA strains. ST25, ST7, and ST2155 only comprised MSSA strains. ST188 only had one MRSA strain. ST88 had five MRSA and 15 MSSA strains. t437 only had three MSSA strains, whereas t441 only comprised MRSA strains. t091 and t189/t078 only comprised MSSA strains.

Quantitative analysis of hla, psmα, pvl, and RNAIIIgene expression

PCR results revealed that all of the isolates carried hla, psmα and RNAIII genes. The pvl gene was detected in 44 strains (27%; 30 MRSA and 14 MSSA). A significantly higher ratio of isolates carrying the pvl gene was observed in the MRSA group than in the MSSA group (χ 2 = 14.864, df =1 and p = 0.000). No difference was found between the MRSA and the MSSA strains in terms of psmα, hla, RNAIII and pvl expression levels (t = -0.208, df =161 and p = 0.835 for psmα; t = -0.174, df =161 and p = 0.862 for hla; t = -1.486, df =161 and p = 0.139 for RNAIII; t = 0.772, df = 161 and p = 0.441 for pvl; see Additional file 3: Figure S1).

Significant differences were observed in the gene expression levels of the four genes among the six most dominant ST genotypes (F = 3.947 and p = 0.003 for psmα; F = 7.62 and p = 0.00 for hla; F =9.276 and p = 0.00 for RNAIII; and F = 3.22 and p = 0.01 for pvl). The expression levels of the psmα genes in ST59 were significantly higher than those in ST7 (p = 0.003). Higher expression levels of hla and RNAIII were detected in the ST59 strains than those in the ST88, ST7 and ST188 strains (p = 0.00, p = 0.009 and p = 0.00 for hla; and p = 0.00, p = 0.001 and p = 0.00 for RNAIII). In addition, a higher pvl gene expression level was also observed in the ST59 strain than in the ST188 and ST7 strains (p = 0.008 and p = 0.021). Lower pvl expression was observed in ST59 than in the ST25 strains (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Expression of the psmα, hla, RNAIII, and pvl genes in different MLST-type and SPA-type isolates. The expression of key genes was measured by qRT–PCR of cultures grown to the early phase of stationary growth in TSB. gyrB cDNA was used as an endogenous control. USA300 was used as a normalized control to measure sample expression. Data was normalized by transforming the data by log10 (gene expression values). The results are the means of each group and are presented as means ± standard errors of the means. *: p <0.05, **: p <0.01, ***: p <0.001 (one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparison test vs. ST59).

Discussion

Clinical characteristics of invasive CA-SA infections in children

As a pathogen with extremely high prevalence, CA-SA causes various severe clinical infections and is associated with morbidity and mortality [4],[17],[34],[35]. In Suryadevara’s study, most of the 128 children with invasive SA infections showed symptoms of bacteremia and musculoskeletal infections, and 61.8% of these children were under 4 years age [4]. Chen reported that cases in children under 1 year of age accounted for 29% of the total number of children with invasive CA-MRSA infections [36]. Klevens reported that bacteremia and pneumonia are the most common diseases in invasive MRSA infections [17]. In the present study, children younger than 1 year of age accounted for approximately 64.4% of the total cases with invasive SA infections, and bacteremia was the most common diagnosis. In addition, 68.1% of the children exhibited two or more infective sites, indicating that the clinical manifestations of invasive SA infections are complex in young children.

Previous studies have also revealed that invasive MRSA in children mainly resulted in multi-sites infections [36],[37]. However, few studies have reported the clinical features of pediatric invasive MSSA infections. In the current study, significantly higher proportion of bacteremia, musculoskeletal infection and multi-site infections were found in the pediatric MSSA group than in the MRSA group, which differed from the results reported for adults [16],[38]. Recent studies have reported that fewer MSSA cells were required to cause the same rate of death in mice than MRSA cells, indicating the higher pathogenicity of MSSA than MRSA [39]. In addition, differences in virulence of epidemic clones and sensitivities of different populations may also contribute to these results. However, no significant difference in the mortality and PRISM scores was observed between children with invasive MRSA and those with MSSA infections. In the present study, some of the cases had hospitalizations during the previous year and colonization of SA might not be ruled out among those patients. A high proportion of MRSA infections was observed in this study, and therefore the choice of effective antibiotics is important for successful management in invasive CA-SA infection.

Molecular features of invasive CA-SA isolates

This is the first study to analyze of the molecular characteristics of invasive CA-MSSA strains isolated from children in mainland China. Diverse types including ST88, ST25, ST7, ST2155 and ST188, have been identified in this study, which differ from those detected in Europe, Australia and Taiwan [21],[22],[40]. In addition, the common clones of CA-MSSA were diverse, as reported previously in other geographical regions [21],[22],[40], indicating that MSSA strains isolated from invasive infection may also have regional characteristics.

MSSA has been proposed to gain or lose drug resistance and virulence genes through transduction of phage or Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec (SCCmec) elements, and may finally evolve into MRSA [41]. For example, glycopeptide intermediately susceptible MRSA, discovered in Japan and in the United States, is supposedly derived from ST5-MSSA after acquiring SCCmec II [42]. In the present study, seven ST-SPA types existed in both MRSA and MSSA, and a similar mechanism may contribute to the evolution of MSSA to MRSA. However, in ST59-MSSA strains, only one strain was type t437, which was the dominant SPA type for ST59-MRSA. This finding indicates that ST59-MRSA is probably an entry clone, but did not evolve from local MSSA, similar to the results obtained by Jimenez [38].

Molecular features and disease

Studies have reported that the virulence gene of SA may vary with ST type [22],[24],[29]. Little information exists on whether molecular types contribute to different clinical manifestations. Nair reported that invasive infections caused by USA300 and non-USA300 strains did not differ in mortality [43], whereas Wehrhahn et al. found that ST45-MSSA, ST47-MSSA and ST22-MRSA corresponded to bloodstream infections [22]. In this study, no significant differences were found in the PRISM scores, infective site number or infective type among different ST and SPA types. Several factors may affect such analyses, such as strain type, immune status of the host, underlying diseases, quantity of the infecting bacteria and the route of infection.

Expression of key virulence genes

Key virulence genes- hla, psmα and RNAIII may have major functions in various infections associated with SA in animal models. Li et al. found that the expression levels of these genes were related to disease severity in the rabbit model and proposed that the expressions of these genes can be used for assessing the virulence of MRSA [28]. Kobayashi deemed that hla, psmα, and RNAIII perform important functions in USA300-induced mouse skin infection [44]. A number of studies have shown that the pathogenic potential of MRSA may be related to the expression levels of virulence genes, especially the key virulence genes. However, differences in the expression levels of key virulence genes have not been clearly investigated between MRSA and MSSA, and among the different ST of MSSA. Our previous studies revealed that expressions of hla, psma, RNAIII and pvl in ST59 were higher than those in other MRSA STs [29]. In the present study, stronger associations were detected among the six common genotypes of the isolates and their expressions of virulence genes. However, ST was not correlated with PRISM score. Based on these results, it appears that SA virulence genes do not solely act in causing infection, they may also play a causative role by the regulation of virulence. In addition, in the present study, the pvl gene was only detected in 27% of the isolates, in which MRSA accounted for 68.1%. This result indicates that the pvl gene does not play a crucial role in SA pathogenicity.

Conclusion

In this study, the clinical and molecular characteristics of invasive SA infections are investigated in Chinese children for the first time. Multifarious clinical manifestations were observed for invasive SA infections. MSSA may be associated with more multi-site infections, bacteremia and musculoskeletal infections. ST may contribute to different expression levels of virulence genes. The limitation of this study is that sample size is relatively low, multicenter studies are needed for further verification of our findings. However, our results help to clarify the pathogenic mechanism of this organism. These findings may have implications for rational drug use and the treatment of SA-induced invasive infections in children.

Authors’ contributions

YHQ and XN were responsible for the study design, data collection, conducting the experiments and drafting of the manuscript; RZZ, YJZ, QC, FD and WQS were responsible for data and sample collection; LJW, JL and SPL performed the experiments; TZ and YHD performed the statistical analysis; YHY, KHY and SJY critically revised the manuscript; XZS contributed to the design of the study and drafting the manuscript, analyzing the data, and revising the final version of the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Additional files

Abbreviations

CA-SA: 

Community-acquired Staphylococcus aureus

PRISM: 

Pediatric risk of mortality

SA: 

Staphylococcus aureus

MRSA: 

Methicillin- resistant SA

HA-SA: 

Hospital-acquired SA

CA-MRSA: 

Community-acquired methicillin-resistant SA

CA-MSSA: 

Community-acquired methicillin-susceptible SA

hla

hemolysin-a genes

psmα

a-type phenol-soluble modulins

pvl

Panton–Valentine leukocidin

PCR: 

Polymerase chain reaction

MLST: 

multilocus sequence typing

STs: 

sequence types

SPA: 

staphylococcal protein A

TSB: 

tryptic soy broth

Declarations

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81171648) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China and the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong Joint Research Scheme (no. 81061160509). We would like to thank Prof. Baolin Sun from the University of Science and Technology of China, Prof. Jianzhong Zhang from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention and Prof. Yongqiang Jiang from the Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, Academy of Military Medical Sciences for their assistance with the experimental techniques. We are also grateful for the help provided by Wei Gao and Lin Yuan from the Beijing Pediatric Research Institute, Beijing Children’s Hospital.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Key Laboratory of Major Diseases in Children and National Key Discipline of Pediatrics, Ministry of Education, Beijing Pediatric Research Institute, Beijing Children’s Hospital, Capital Medical University
(2)
Pediatric Department of Aviation General Hospital
(3)
Jiangxi Children’s Hospital
(4)
Shenzhen Children’s Hospital

References

  1. Lowy FD: Staphylococcus aureus infections. N Engl J Med. 1998, 339: 520-532. 10.1056/NEJM199808203390806.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Hadler JL, Petit S, Mandour M, Cartter ML: Trends in invasive infection with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Connecticut, USA, 2001–2010. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012, 18: 917-924. 10.3201/eid1806.120182.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Sola C, Paganini H, Egea AL, Moyano AJ, Garnero A, Kevric I, Culasso C, Vindel A, Lopardo H, Bocco JL: Spread of epidemic MRSA-ST5-IV clone encoding PVL as a major cause of community onset staphylococcal infections in Argentinean children. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e30487-10.1371/journal.pone.0030487.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Suryadevara M, Moro MR, Rosenbaum PF, Kiska D, Riddell S, Weiner LB, Shaw J: Incidence of invasive community-onset Staphylococcus aureus infections in children in Central New York. J Pediatr. 2010, 156: 152-154. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.07.020. e1View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Gonzalez BE, Martinez-Aguilar G, Hulten KG, Hammerman WA, Coss-Bu J, Avalos-Mishaan A, Mason EO, Kaplan SL: Severe Staphylococcal sepsis in adolescents in the era of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Pediatrics. 2005, 115: 642-648. 10.1542/peds.2004-2300.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Four pediatric deaths from community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus--Minnesota and North Dakota, 1997–1999. JAMA. 1999, 282: 1123-1125.Google Scholar
  7. Cunnington A, Brick T, Cooper M, Danin J, Hunt D, Jeanes A, Kearns AM, Nolan M, Lyall H: Severe invasive Panton-Valentine Leucocidin positive Staphylococcus aureus infections in children in London, UK. J Infect. 2009, 59: 28-36. 10.1016/j.jinf.2009.05.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Strand K, Søreide E, Aardal S, Flaatten H: A comparison of SAPS II and SAPS 3 in a Norwegian intensive care unit population. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009, 53: 595-600. 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.01948.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Pollack MM, Ruttimann UE, Getson PR: Pediatric risk of mortality (PRISM) score. Crit Care Med. 1988, 16: 1110-1116. 10.1097/00003246-198811000-00006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Pollack MM, Patel KM, Ruttimann U, Cuerdon T: Frequency of variable measurement in 16 pediatric intensive care units: influence on accuracy and potential for bias in severity of illness assessment. Crit Care Med. 1996, 24: 74-77. 10.1097/00003246-199601000-00013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Pollack MM, Patel KM, Ruttimann UE: PRISM III: an updated Pediatric Risk of Mortality score. Crit Care Med. 1996, 24: 743-752. 10.1097/00003246-199605000-00004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Martha VF, Garcia PC, Piva JP, Einloft PR, Bruno F, Rampon V: Comparison of two prognostic scores (PRISM and PIM) at a pediatric intensive care unit. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2005, 81: 259-264. 10.2223/JPED.1348.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Brady AR, Harrison D, Black S, Jones S, Rowan K, Pearson G, Ratcliffe J, Parry GJ: Assessment and optimization of mortality prediction tools for admissions to pediatric intensive care in the United Kingdom. Pediatrics. 2006, 117: e733-e742. 10.1542/peds.2005-1853.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gerardin P, Rogier C, Leteurtre S, Jouvencel P, Ka AS, Imbert P: Evaluation of Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM) scoring in African children with falciparum malaria. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2006, 7: 45-47. 10.1097/01.PCC.0000192321.66637.E6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Taori RN, Lahiri KR, Tullu MS: Performance of PRISM (Pediatric Risk of Mortality) score and PIM (Pediatric Index of Mortality) score in a tertiary care pediatric ICU. Indian J Pediatr. 2010, 77: 267-271. 10.1007/s12098-010-0031-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Wehrhahn MC, Robinson JO, Pearson JC, O'Brien FG, Tan HL, Coombs GW, Pascoe EM, Lee R, Salvaris P, Salvaris R, New D, Murray RJ: Clinical and laboratory features of invasive community-onset methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection: a prospective case–control study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010, 29: 1025-1033. 10.1007/s10096-010-0973-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Klevens RM, Morrison MA, Nadle J, Petit S, Gershman K, Ray S, Harrison LH, Lynfield R, Dumyati G, Townes JM, Craig AS, Zell ER, Fosheim GE, McDougal LK, Carey RB, Fridkin SK: Invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in the United States. JAMA. 2007, 298: 1763-1771. 10.1001/jama.298.15.1763.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Dauwalder O, Lina G, Durand G, Bes M, Meugnier H, Jarlier V, Coignard B, Vandenesch F, Etienne J, Laurent F: Epidemiology of invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones collected in France in 2006 and 2007. J Clin Microbiol. 2008, 46: 3454-3458. 10.1128/JCM.01050-08.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Senn L, Basset P, Greub G, Prod'hom G, Frei R, Zbinden R, Gaia V, Balmelli C, Pfyffer GE, M hlemann K, Zanetti G, Blanc DS: Molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Switzerland: sampling only invasive isolates does not allow a representative description of the local diversity of clones. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013, 19: E288-E290. 10.1111/1469-0691.12185.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Qiao Y, Dong F, Song W, Wang L, Yang Y, Shen X: Hospital- and community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a 6-year surveillance study of invasive infections in Chinese children. Acta Paediatr. 2013, 102: 1081-1086.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Grundmann H, Aanensen DM, van den Wijngaard CC, Spratt BG, Harmsen D, Friedrich AW: Geographic distribution of Staphylococcus aureus causing invasive infections in Europe: a molecular-epidemiological analysis. PLoS Med. 2010, 7: e1000215-10.1371/journal.pmed.1000215.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Wehrhahn MC, Robinson JO, Pascoe EM, Coombs GW, Pearson JC, O'Brien FG, Tan HL, New D, Salvaris P, Salvaris R, Murray RJ: Illness severity in community-onset invasive Staphylococcus aureus infection and the presence of virulence genes. J Infect Dis. 2012, 205: 1840-1848. 10.1093/infdis/jis279.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hienz SA, Schennings T, Heimdahl A, Flock JI: Collagen binding of Staphylococcus aureus is a virulence factor in experimental endocarditis. J Infect Dis. 1996, 174: 83-88. 10.1093/infdis/174.1.83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Otto M: MRSA virulence and spread. Cell Microbiol. 2012, 14: 1513-1521. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2012.01832.x.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Otto M: A MRSA-terious enemy among us: end of the PVL controversy?. Nat Med. 2011, 17: 169-170. 10.1038/nm0211-169.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Montgomery CP, Boyle-Vavra S, Adem PV, Lee JC, Husain AN, Clasen J, Daum RS: Comparison of virulence in community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pulsotypes USA300 and USA400 in a rat model of pneumonia. J Infect Dis. 2008, 198: 561-570. 10.1086/590157.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Boakes E, Kearns AM, Badiou C, Lina G, Hill RL, Ellington MJ: Do differences in Panton-Valentine leukocidin production among international methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones affect disease presentation and severity?. J Clin Microbiol. 2012, 50: 1773-1776. 10.1128/JCM.06421-11.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Li M, Cheung GY, Hu J, Wang D, Joo HS, Deleo FR, Otto M: Comparative analysis of virulence and toxin expression of global community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains. J Infect Dis. 2010, 202: 1866-1876. 10.1086/657419.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Li S, Sun J, Zhang J, Li X, Tao X, Wang L, Sun M, Liu Y, Li J, Qiao Y, Yu S, Yao K, Yang Y, Shen X: Comparative analysis of the virulence characteristics of epidemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains isolated from Chinese children: ST59 MRSA highly expresses core gene-encoded toxin. APMIS. 2014, 122: 101-114. 10.1111/apm.12105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Mongkolrattanothai K, Aldag JC, Mankin P, Gray BM: Epidemiology of community-onset Staphylococcus aureus infections in pediatric patients: an experience at a Children’s Hospital in central Illinois. BMC Infect Dis. 2009, 9: 112-10.1186/1471-2334-9-112.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Liu C, Bayer A, Cosgrove SE, Daum RS, Fridkin SK, Gorwitz RJ, Kaplan SL, Karchmer AW, Levine DP, Murray BE, J Rybak M, Talan DA, Chambers HF: Clinical practice guidelines by the infectious diseases society of america for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children: executive summary. Clin Infect Dis. 2011, 52: 285-292. 10.1093/cid/cir034.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Wong CH, Chang HC, Pasupathy S, Khin LW, Tan JL, Low CO: Necrotizing fasciitis: clinical presentation, microbiology, and determinants of mortality. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003, 85-A: 1454-1460.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Li J, Wang L, Ip M, Sun M, Sun J, Huang G, Wang C, Deng L, Zheng Y, Fu Z, Li C, Shang Y, Zhao C, Yu S, Yao K, Yang Y, Shen X: Molecular and clinical characteristics of clonal complex 59 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in Mainland China. PLoS One. 2013, 8: e70602-10.1371/journal.pone.0070602.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Dantes R, Mu Y, Belflower R, Aragon D, Dumyati G, Harrison LH, Lessa FC, Lynfield R, Nadle J, Petit S, Ray SM, Schaffner W, Townes J, Fridkin S: National Burden of Invasive Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections, United States, 2011. JAMA Intern Med. 2013, 173: 1970-1978.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Iwamoto M, Mu Y, Lynfield R, Bulens SN, Nadle J, Aragon D, Petit S, Ray SM, Harrison LH, Dumyati G, Townes JM, Schaffner W, Gorwitz RJ, Lessa FC: Trends in invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Pediatrics. 2013, 132: e817-e824. 10.1542/peds.2013-1112.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Chen CJ, Huang YC, Chiu CH, Su LH, Lin TY: Clinical features and genotyping analysis of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in Taiwanese children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2005, 24: 40-45. 10.1097/01.inf.0000148926.11227.1c.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Creel AM, Durham SH, Benner KW, Alten JA, Winkler MK: Severe invasive community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in previously healthy children. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2009, 10: 323-327. 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181988798.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Jiménez JN, Ocampo AM, Vanegas JM, Rodriguez EA, Mediavilla JR, Chen L, Muskus CE, Vélez LA, Rojas C, Restrepo AV, Garcés C, Kreiswirth BN, Correa MM: A comparison of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus reveals no clinical and epidemiological but molecular differences. Int J Med Microbiol. 2013, 303: 76-83. 10.1016/j.ijmm.2012.12.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Rozgonyi F, Kocsis E, Kristof K, Nagy K: Is MRSA more virulent than MSSA?. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007, 13: 843-845. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01780.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Chen FJ, Siu LK, Lin JC, Wang CH, Lu PL: Molecular typing and characterization of nasal carriage and community-onset infection methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus isolates in two Taiwan medical centers. BMC Infect Dis. 2012, 12: 343-10.1186/1471-2334-12-343.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Monecke S, Slickers P, Ellington MJ, Kearns AM, Ehricht R: High diversity of Panton-Valentine leukocidin-positive, methicillin-susceptible isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and implications for the evolution of community-associated methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007, 13: 1157-1164. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01833.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Enright MC, Robinson DA, Randle G, Feil EJ, Grundmann H, Spratt BG: The evolutionary history of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002, 99: 7687-7692. 10.1073/pnas.122108599.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Nair R, Ammann E, Rysavy M, Schweizer ML: Mortality among patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA300 versus Non-USA300 invasive infections: a meta-analysis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014, 35: 31-41. 10.1086/674385.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Kobayashi SD, Malachowa N, Whitney AR, Braughton KR, Gardner DJ, Long D, Bubeck Wardenburg J, Schneewind O, Otto M, Deleo FR: Comparative analysis of USA300 virulence determinants in a rabbit model of skin and soft tissue infection. J Infect Dis. 2011, 204: 937-941. 10.1093/infdis/jir441.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Qiao et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.