This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Association between Lactobacillus species and bacterial vaginosis-related bacteria, and bacterial vaginosis scores in pregnant Japanese women
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-7-128
© Tamrakar et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 20 February 2007
Accepted: 07 November 2007
Published: 07 November 2007
Abstract
Background
Bacterial vaginosis (BV), the etiology of which is still uncertain, increases the risk of preterm birth. Recent PCR-based studies suggested that BV is associated with complex vaginal bacterial communities, including many newly recognized bacterial species in non-pregnant women.
Methods
To examine whether these bacteria are also involved in BV in pregnant Japanese women, vaginal fluid samples were taken from 132 women, classified as normal (n = 98), intermediate (n = 21), or BV (n = 13) using the Nugent gram stain criteria, and studied. DNA extracted from these samples was analyzed for bacterial sequences of any Lactobacillus, four Lactobacillus species, and four BV-related bacteria by PCR with primers for 16S ribosomal DNA including a universal Lactobacillus primer, Lactobacillus species-specific primers for L. crispatus, L. jensenii, L. gasseri, and L. iners, and BV-related bacterium-specific primers for BVAB2, Megasphaera, Leptotrichia, and Eggerthella-like bacterium.
Results
The prevalences of L. crispatus, L. jensenii, and L. gasseri were significantly higher, while those of BVAB2, Megasphaera, Leptotrichia, and Eggerthella-like bacterium were significantly lower in the normal group than in the BV group. Unlike other Lactobacillus species, the prevalence of L. iners did not differ between the three groups and women with L. iners were significantly more likely to have BVAB2, Megasphaera, Leptotrichia, and Eggerthella-like bacterium. Linear regression analysis revealed associations of BVAB2 and Megasphaera with Nugent score, and multivariate regression analyses suggested a close relationship between Eggerthella-like bacterium and BV.
Conclusion
The BV-related bacteria, including BVAB2, Megasphaera, Leptotrichia, and Eggerthella-like bacterium, are common in the vagina of pregnant Japanese women with BV. The presence of L. iners may be correlated with vaginal colonization by these BV-related bacteria.
Keywords
Background
Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is the disturbed vaginal flora, in which normal lactobacilli are replaced by an overgrowth of various anaerobic bacteria [1]. This condition is common in women of reproductive age [1, 2] and may cause malodorous vaginal discharge, although in many women it is asymptomatic [3]. In pregnant women, bacterial vaginosis has been suggested to be a risk factor of perinatal complications, including preterm birth [1, 4–12] and chorioamnionitis [4, 13]. These complications are closely associated with neonatal morbidity and mortality worldwide.
Bacteria detected in BV flora include Gardnerella vaginalis, Mycoplasma hominis, Mobiluncus species (sp.), and other anaerobic bacteria, i.e., Peptostreptococcus sp., Prevotella sp., and Bacteroides sp. [1, 14–16]. Recently, bacteria such as Atopobium vaginae, Megasphaera sp., Leptotrichia sp., and Eggerthella-like bacterium have been reported as microorganisms related to this condition by molecular analyses [17–19]. Fredricks et al. identified three phylogenetically distinct bacterial DNA sequences in human vaginal samples highly specific for this condition and designated them BV-associated bacteria (BVAB) 1~3 [19]. They showed that BVABs, Megasphaera, Leptotrichia, and Eggerthella-like bacterium are more specific for BV than Gardnerella and Atopobium [19]. Among BVABs, BVAB2 was shown to be more sensitive for BV than BVAB1 and BVAB3, while the specificities of three BVABs were similar [19]. We use the term "BV-related bacteria" for bacteria including BVAB2, Megasphaera, Leptotrichia, and Eggerthella-like bacterium in this manuscript. However, it is important to note that these organisms have not been proven to be causative agents of BV.
The healthy human vaginal flora in reproductive age is usually predominated by Lactobacillus species. Their metabolic products, such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), lactic acid, and bacteriocin are believed to play an important role in maintenance of the normal vaginal flora by inhibiting colonization by other pathogens [20–23]. The predominant Lactobacillus species in the normal lactobacillary flora were shown by molecular biological analyses to be L. crispatus, L. gasseri, and L. jensenii [23–28]. In recent studies, L. iners described as L. 1086V by Antonio et al. [24] was identified as one of the common Lactobacillus species colonizing the human vagina [18, 28–31]. Only 9% of the strains of this species produce H2O2, whereas almost all strains of L. crispatus and L. jensenii produce H2O2 [24].
To date, there have been few studies regarding the frequencies of the BV-related bacteria described above and Lactobacillus species in healthy and abnormal vaginal flora in pregnant women. The present study was performed to evaluate the prevalence of the BV-related bacteria and the common Lactobacillus species in normal and BV flora in pregnant Japanese women. We used a specific PCR method targeting the bacterial 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) region for this purpose.
Methods
Patients
A total of 163 pregnant Japanese women were enrolled in this study during routine prenatal visits at Hokkaido University Hospital from May 2005 to February 2006. Informed consent was obtained from all participants in verbal form. Vaginal fluid samples were collected at a mean of 23 weeks of gestation. Estimated date of delivery was determined from the last menstrual period and early gestational fetal ultrasonographic measurements.
Sample collection, Nugent's scoring, and bacterial culture
A sterile speculum was inserted into the vagina and a specimen of vaginal fluid was obtained by brushing the posterior vaginal fornix with a swab. A vaginal smear was prepared by rolling a swab onto a glass slide, which was then air-dried, heat-fixed, and Gram-stained. The smears were then assessed according to Nugent criteria [32]. The other swab was spread onto Columbia blood agar plates, and incubated at 35°C under aerobic conditions in 5% CO2 and anaerobic conditions for 48 h. Lactobacilli were identified to the genus level by Gram staining of colonies and from colony morphology on blood agar plates.
DNA extraction and PCR
Another swab was placed in 1 ml of PBS with subsequent vigorous vortexing to dislodge cells. The cells were centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 5 min. The pellet was digested with proteinase K at 56°C for 30–60 min and the DNA was extracted and purified with a QIAmp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions, resulting in 200 μl of DNA solution. PCR mixtures consisted of PCR buffer with 1.5 mM of MgCl2, 10 pmol of each primer, 2.0 μM of each deoxyribonucleoside triphosphate, 0.1 μl of Taq DNA polymerase, and 1.5 μl of template DNA solution in a final volume of 15 μl.
PCR primers
Name | Sequence(5'-3') | Target | Annealing temperature (°C) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LactoF LactoR | TGGAAACAGRTGCTAATACCG GTCCATTGTGGAAGATTCCC | Lactobacillus | 62 | [33] |
LcrisF LcrisR | AGCGAGCGGAACTAACAGATTTAC AGCTGATCATGCGATCTGCTT | L. crispatus | 65 | [33] |
LjensF LjensR | AAGTCGAGCGAGCTTGCCTATAGA CTTCTTTCATGCGAAAGTAGC | L. jensenii | 60 | the present study |
LgassF LgassR | AGCGAGCTTGCCTAGATGAATTTG TCTTTTAAACTCTAGACATGCGTC | L. gasseri | 63 | the present study |
LinersF LinersR | CTCTGCCTTGAAGATCGGAGTGC ACAGTTGATAGGCATCATCTG | L. iners | 65 | the present study |
Uncxb2-619F Uncxb2-1024R | TTAACCTTGGGGTTCATTACAA AATTCAGTCTCCTGAATCGTCAGA | BVAB2 | 55 | [19] |
Egger-621F Egger-859R | AACCTCGAGCCGGGTTCC TCGGCACGGAAGATGTAATCT | Eggerthella-like bacterium | 58 | [19] |
Lepto-395F Lepto-646R | CAATTCTGTGTGTGTGAAGAAG ACAGTTTTGTAGGCAAGCCTAT | Leptotrichia | 55 | [19] |
MegaE-456F MegaE-667R | GATGCCAACAGTATCCGTCCG CCTCTCCGACACTCAAGTTCGA | Megasphaera | 55 | [19] |
Bacterial strains and the specificity of primers
Species | Strain | LactoF | LcrisF | LjensF | LgassF | LinersF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LactoR | LcrisR | LjensR | LgassR | LinersR | ||
L. crispatus | ATCC33197 | + | + | - | - | - |
L. jensenii | ATCC25258 | + | - | + | - | - |
L. gasseri | ATCC 4963 | + | - | - | + | - |
L. acidophilus | ATCC 4356 | + | - | - | - | - |
L. brevis | ATCC 14869 | + | - | - | - | - |
L. casei | ATCC 334 | + | - | - | - | - |
L. delbrueckii | ATCC 11842 | + | - | - | - | - |
L. fermentum | ATCC 14931 | + | - | - | - | - |
L. johnsonii | ATCC 11506 | + | - | - | - | - |
L. helveticus | ATCC 521 | + | - | - | - | - |
L. plantarum | ATCC 8014 | + | - | - | - | - |
L. reuteri | JCM1112 | + | - | - | - | - |
L. rhamnosus | ATCC 7469 | + | - | - | - | - |
L. salvarius | ATCC 11741 | + | - | - | - | - |
The sensitivities of the species-specific PCR for L. crispatus, L. jensenii, and L. gasseri were measured using serial dilutions of DNA solution of the reference strain. Similarly, for L. iners, serial dilutions of a cloned fragment of 16S rDNA region of L. iners were used instead. The sensitivity of the species-specific PCR for L. crispatus, L. jensenii, and L. gasseri and that of L. iners PCR were 102 to 103 copies and 102 copies per reaction, respectively.
Statistical analysis
Fisher's exact probability test was used for statistical analysis. Multivariate logistic-regression analysis using SPSS™ for Windows was performed to evaluate the independent risk factors, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Clinical characteristics of women in three groups divided by Nugent score
A total of 163 samples from 163 pregnant women were obtained during the study period and 31 samples were excluded because of lack of information regarding the gestational week at delivery (n = 21) or Gram staining (n = 10). The remaining 132 samples from 132 women were analyzed and classified according to the Nugent criteria. Ninety-eight women (74.2%) were classified as having normal vaginal flora, 21 (15.9%) were intermediate, and 13 (9.8%) were BV. Samples from these women were divided into normal, intermediate, and BV groups, respectively.
Demographic and obstetric characteristics of women in normal, intermediate, and BV groups
Nugent score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0–3 | 4–6 | 7–10 | ||||
No. of women | 98 | 21 | 13 | |||
Age (years) | 32.6 ± 5.3 | (19–44) | 32.1 ± 5.8 | (20–40) | 29.1 ± 5.3 | (21–37) |
Nulliparity (%) | 46.2 | 52.4 | 50.0 | |||
Gestational week at sampling | 22.6 ± 8.6 | (5–36) | 23.0 ± 9.1 | (7–36) | 24.2 ± 11.2 | (7–37) |
Gestational week at delivery | 37.1 ± 2.9 | (21–41) | 36.4 ± 4.7 | (18–40) | 37.3 ± 5.5 | (20–41) |
Preterm birth at <37 weeks | 26 | 26.5% | 7 | 33.3% | 2 | 15.4% |
Preterm birth at <33 weeks | 6 | 6.1% | 2 | 9.5% | 1 | 7.7% |
Preterm birth at <30 weeks | 2 | 2.0% | 1 | 4.8% | 1 | 7.7% |
Birth weight (g) | 2807 ± 565 | (360–3805) | 2602 ± 794 | (165–3660) | 2807 ± 831 | (350–3555) |
Detection rate of lactobacilli and BV-related bacteria in three groups by PCR
Distribution of lactobacilli and bacterial vaginosis-related bacteria in women in normal, intermediate, and BV groups determined by PCR
Nugent score | |||
|---|---|---|---|
0–3 | 4–6 | 7–10 | |
No. of women | 98 | 21 | 13 |
any Lactobacillus | 97(99.0%) | 21(100.0%) | 12(92.3%) |
L. crispatus | 60(61.2%) | 6(28.6%)§ | 2(15.4%)§ |
L. jensenii | 29(29.6%) | 4(19.0%) | 0(0.0%)† |
L. gasseri | 33(33.7%) | 9(42.9%) | 0(0.0%)§ |
L. iners | 39(39.8%) | 10(47.6%) | 6(46.2%) |
BVAB2 | 3(3.1%) | 4(19.0%)† | 5(38.5%)§ |
Megasphaera | 11(11.2%) | 13(61.9%)§ | 9(69.2%)§ |
Leptotrichia | 14(14.3%) | 5(23.8%) | 7(53.8%)§ |
Eggerthella-like bacterium | 7(7.1%) | 7(33.3%)§ | 7(53.8%)§ |
Independent risk factors for abnormal Nugent score
Independent risk factors for Nugent score ≥ 4 by multivariate regression analysis
β | SE | p-value | Odds (95%CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Constant | -1.32 | 0.35 | ||
L. crispatus | -1.51 | 0.52 | 0.004 | 0.22 (0.08–0.61) |
Megasphaera | 2.60 | 0.51 | 0.001 | 13.33 (4.92–36.11) |
Independent risk factors for Nugent score ≥ 7 by multivariate regression analysis
β | SE | p-value | Odds (95%CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Constant | -2.24 | 0.47 | ||
Eggerthella-like bacterium | 1.83 | 0.65 | 0.005 | 6.24 (1.75–22.21) |
Coexistence of BV-related bacteria with L. iners
Prevalence of various bacteria according to the presence or absence of L. iners
L. iners | |||
|---|---|---|---|
present | absent | p-value | |
Number | 55 | 77 | |
Lactobacillus | 55 (100.0%) | 75 (97.4%) | 0.510 |
L.crispatus | 25 (45.5%) | 43(55.8%) | 0.290 |
L. jensenii | 13 (23.6%) | 20(26.0%) | 0.840 |
L. gasseri | 15 (27.3%) | 27(35.1%) | 0.449 |
BVAB2 | 11 (20.0%) | 1 (1.3%) | <0.001 |
Megasphaera | 21 (38.2%) | 12(15.6%) | 0.004 |
Leptotrichia | 19 (34.5%) | 7(9.1%) | <0.001 |
Eggerthella-like bacterium | 15 (27.3%) | 6 (7.8%) | 0.004 |
Difference in the detection of Lactobacillusspecies between PCR and culture methods
Differences in detection between PCR and cultivation methods
PCR | CULTURE | CULTURE/PCR(%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
any Lactobacillus | 130 | 104 | 80.0% |
L. crispatus | 68 | 63 | 92.6% |
L. jensenii | 33 | 32 | 97.0% |
L. gasseri | 42 | 39 | 92.9% |
L. iners | 55 | 41 | 74.5% |
L. crispatus only | 24 | 22 | 91.7%§ |
L. jensenii only | 5 | 4 | 80.0%§ |
L. gasseri only | 14 | 13 | 92.9%§ |
L. iners only | 21 | 10 | 47.6%§ |
Lactobacillus, unspecified spp.only | 11 | 3 | 27.3%§ |
Discussion
In the present study, we confirmed that L. crispatus, L. gasseri, and L. jensenii were common species in pregnant Japanese women with normal vaginal flora by species-specific PCR of the 16S rDNA region. These three species were less prevalent in women with BV. In contrast, four BV-related bacteria, i.e., BVAB2, Megasphaera, Leptotrichia, and Eggerthella-like bacterium, were detected at higher prevalence in women with BV. As all these results were in accordance with those of Fredricks et al. [19] who analyzed the vaginal fluid of non-pregnant women with and without BV using the broad-range 16S rDNA PCR and cloning methods, BV is suggested to have remarkably similar microbiological profiles among women with different demographic characteristics, including race and pregnancy, as suggested by the conventional cultivation method.
L. crispatus, L. gasseri, and L. jensenii are common Lactobacillus species found in the vagina [24–28, 31, 34]. L. iners, described recently as a new Lactobacillus species [29], is one of the common Lactobacillus species of the vaginal microbiota [18, 19, 23, 28, 30, 31], which was also confirmed in the present study. The results showed that L. iners was present in 40% to 50% of women irrespective of Nugent score, as observed in an earlier study [19]. We examined twelve samples positive for L. iners (6 from normal flora and 6 from BV flora) to determine whether the abundance of L. iners was different in the two groups. The species-specific PCR for L. iners using serial dilutions of each sample revealed that both normal and BV flora contained 103 to 105 copies/μl of L. iners and the median concentration was 104 copies/μl for both.
As the presence of H2O2-producing lactobacilli in the vaginal fluid is associated with a reduced risk of BV [15, 24] and because the concentration of H2O2 in the vaginal fluid is low in women with BV as compared with those with normal vaginal flora [21], the H2O2-producing ability of lactobacilli is thought to play a significant role in protecting the vaginal ecosystem from BV infection, although direct evidence to support this notion is lacking. Nearly all strains of L. crispatus and L. jensenii have been reported to produce H2O2, whereas only 9% of the strains of L. iners produce H2O2 [24]. The prevalences of L. crispatus and L. jensenii were significantly higher in the normal group than in the BV group and the detection rates of all BV-related bacteria were significantly higher in women with than in those without L. iners in this study. Although this observation is consistent with the notion that H2O2-producing ability of lactobacilli is important in protecting the vaginal ecosystem from BV infection, it remains to be determined whether these observations resulted from differences in H2O2-producing ability of these lactobacilli.
The newly proposed "BV-related bacteria," including BVAB2, Megasphaera, Leptotrichia, and Eggerthella-like bacterium, were all shown to be associated with BV in the present study, confirming the results of a recent study by Fredricks et al. [19]. However, the detection rates of these bacteria in women with BV were lower, while those in women with normal flora were similar to their results [19]. BVAB2 is cultivation-resistant, one of three bacteria (provisionally named BV-associated bacteria: BVAB1, BVAB2, and BVAB3) newly found to be highly specific for BV in the vagina of non-pregnant women [19], and not closely related to other bacteria as shown by comparison of 16S rDNA. In the present study, BVAB2 was present in 38.5% (5/13) and 3.1% (3/98) of women with BV and with normal vaginal flora, respectively, while Fredricks et al. reported these rates to be 88.9% (24/27) and 4.3% (2/46), respectively [19]. Similarly, detection rates of Megasphaera (69.2%),Eggerthella-like bacterium (53.8%), and Leptotrichia (53.8%) in women with BV in the present study were lower than those of 96.3%, 92.6%, and 85.2% reported by Fredricks et al. [19], while detection rates of Megasphaera (11.2%),Eggerthella-like bacterium (7.1%), and Leptotrichia (14.3%) in women with normal vaginal flora were comparable to their values of 8.7%, 8.7%, and 4.3%, respectively [19].
The results of the present study raised the possibility that the four BV-related bacteria were less prevalent in pregnant Japanese women with BV as compared with non-pregnant American women. However, the number of subjects with BV in the present study was too low to draw definitive conclusions about the prevalence of bacteria in different populations. Further studies using different demographic populations are needed to determine the roles of these BV-related bacteria in the pathogenesis of BV.
Twelve (92%) of 13 women with BV were positive for genus Lactobacillus by 16S rDNA PCR using the universal Lactobacillus primer, including 5 women with L. iners, one with both L. iners and L. crispatus, one with L. crispatus, and 5 with unspecified Lactobacillus. Of these 13 women, only one with L. iners was positive for Lactobacillus by general cultivation methods and positive for Gram-positive rods on Gram staining. These results suggested that many women with BV harbor genus Lactobacillus in the vagina and that the number of these lactobacilli colonizing the vagina is small. Further, as L. iners has been reported to require specialized blood agar media for isolation [29], the conventional culture method used in this study may have failed to reveal its colonization in the vagina.
Conclusion
Our results suggested that BV-related bacteria, including BVAB2, Megasphaera, Leptotrichia, and Eggerthella-like bacterium, were associated with BV in pregnant Japanese women. The presence of L. iners, one of the common Lactobacillus species in the vagina, may be correlated with vaginal colonization by these BV-related bacteria. It remains to be determined whether BV-related bacteria cause BV or are common and abundant as a consequence of BV.
Declarations
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Takahiro Yamada, Mashiho Minami, and Ayano Yamazaki for sample collection, and Hirotsugu Akisawa for reading gram staining results and bacterial cultures. Renuka Tamrakar is supported by Sato International Scholarship Foundation.
Authors’ Affiliations
References
- Sobel JD: Bacterial vaginosis. Annu Rev Med. 2000, 51: 349-356. 10.1146/annurev.med.51.1.349.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang J: Bacterial vaginosis. Prim Care Update Ob Gyns. 2000, 7: 181-185. 10.1016/S1068-607X(00)00043-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Burton JP, Reid G: Evaluation of the bacterial vaginal flora of 20 postmenopausal women by direct (Nugent score) and molecular (polymerase chain reaction and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis) techniques. J Infect Dis. 2002, 186: 1770-1780. 10.1086/345761.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gravett MG, Hummel D, Eschenbach DA, Holmes KK: Preterm labor associated with subclinical amniotic fluid infection and with bacterial vaginosis. Obstet Gynecol. 1986, 67: 229-237.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Krohn MA, Hillier SL, Lee ML, Rabe LK, Eschenbach DA: Vaginal Bacteroides species are associated with an increased rate of preterm delivery among women in preterm labor. J Infect Dis. 1991, 164: 88-93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McDonald HM, O'Loughlin JA, Jolley P, Vigneswaran R, McDonald PJ: Vaginal infection and preterm labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991, 98: 427-435.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Holst E, Goffeng AR, Andersch B: Bacterial vaginosis and vaginal microorganisms in idiopathic premature labor and association with pregnancy outcome. J Clin Microbiol. 1994, 32: 176-186.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hay PE, Lamont RF, Taylor-Robinson D, Morgan DJ, Ison C, Pearson J: Abnormal bacterial colonisation of the genital tract and subsequent preterm delivery and late miscarriage. BMJ. 1994, 308: 295-298.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hillier SL, Nugent RP, Eschenbach DA, Krohn MA, Gibbs RS, Martin DH, Cotch MF, Edelman R, Pastorek JG, Rao AV, McNellis D, Regan JA, Carey JC, Klebanoff MA: Association between bacterial vaginosis and preterm delivery of a low-birth-weight infant. The Vaginal Infections and Prematurity Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1995, 333: 1737-1742. 10.1056/NEJM199512283332604.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Subtil D, Denoit V, Goueff FL, Husson MO, Trivier D, Puech F: The role of bacterial vaginosis in preterm labor and preterm birth: a case-control study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biology. 2002, 101: 41-46. 10.1016/S0301-2115(01)00515-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Usui R, Ohkuchi A, Matsubara S, Izumi A, Watanabe T, Suzuki M, Minakami H: Vaginal lactobacilli and preterm birth. J Perinat Med. 2002, 30: 458-466. 10.1515/JPM.2002.072.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leitich H, Bodner-Adler B, Brunbauer M, Kaider A, Egarter C, Husslein P: Bacterial vaginosis as a risk factor for preterm delivery: A meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003, 189: 139-147. 10.1067/mob.2003.339.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hillier SL, Martius J, Krohn M, Kiviat N, Holmes KK, Eschenbach DA: A case-control study of chorioamnionic infection and histologic chorioamnionitis in prematurity. N Engl J Med. 1988, 319: 972-978.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hill GB: The microbiology of bacterial vaginosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993, 169: 450-454.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hillier SL, Krohn MA, Rabe LK, Klebanoff SJ, Eschenbach DA: The normal vaginal flora, H2O2-producing lactobacilli, and bacterial vaginosis in pregnant women. Clin Infec Dis. 1993, 16: S273-81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thorsen P, Jensen IP, Jeune B, Ebbesen N, Arpi M, Bremmelgaard A, Moller BR: Few microorganisms associated with bacterial vaginosis may constitute the pathologic core: A population-based microbiologic study among 3596 pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998, 178: 580-587. 10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70442-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ferris MJ, Masztal A, Aldridge KE, Fortenberry JD, Fidel PL, Martin DH: Association of Atopobium vaginae, a recently described metronidazole resistant anaerobe, with bacterial vaginosis. BMC Infect Dis. 2004, 4: 5-10.1186/1471-2334-4-5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Zhou X, Bent SJ, Schneider MG, Davis CC, Islam MR, Forney LJ: Characterization of vaginal microbial communities in adult healthy women using cultivation-independent methods. Microbiology. 2004, 150: 2565-2573. 10.1099/mic.0.26905-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fredricks DN, Fiedler TL, Marrazzo JM: Molecular identification of bacteria associated with bacterial vaginosis. N Eng J Med. 2005, 353: 1899-1911. 10.1056/NEJMoa043802.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Klebanoff SJ, Hillier SL, Eschenbach DA, Waltersdorph AM: Control of the microbial flora of the vagina by H2O2-generating lactobacilli. J Infect Dis. 1991, 164: 94-100.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Al-Mushrif S, Jones BM: A study of the prevalence of hydrogen peroxide generating Lactobacilli in bacterial vaginosis: the determination of H2O2 concentrations generated, in vitro, by isolated strains and the levels found in vaginal secretions of women with and without infection. J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998, 18: 63-67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Onderdonk AB, Lee ML, Lieberman E, Delaney ML, Tuomala RE: Quantitative microbiologic models for preterm delivery. J Clin Microbiol. 2003, 41: 1073-1079. 10.1128/JCM.41.3.1073-1079.2003.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wilks M, Wiggins R, Whiley A, Hennessy E, Warwick S, Porter H, Corfield A, Millar M: Identification and H2O2 production of vaginal lactobacilli from pregnant women at high risk of preterm birth and relation with outcome. J Clin Microbiol. 2004, 42: 713-717. 10.1128/JCM.42.2.713-717.2004.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Antonio MAD, Hawes SE, Hillier SL: The identification of vaginal Lactobacillus species and the demographic and microbiologic characteristics of women colonized by these species. J Infect Dis. 1999, 180: 1950-1956. 10.1086/315109.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Song YL, Kato N, Matsumiya Y, Liu CX, Kato H, Watanabe K: Identification of and hydrogen peroxide production by fecal and vaginal lactobacilli isolated from Japanese women and newborn infants. J Clin Microbiol. 1999, 37: 3062-3064.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Vallor AC, Antonio MAD, Hawes SE, Hillier SL: Factors associated with acquisition of, or persistent colonization by, vaginal lactobacilli: Role of hydrogen peroxide production. J Infect Dis. 2001, 184: 1431-1436. 10.1086/324445.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pavlova SI, Kilic AO, Kilic SS, So JS, Nader-Macias ME, Simoes JA, Tao L: Genetic diversity of vaginal lactobacilli from women in different countries based on 16S rRNA gene sequences. J Appl Microbiol. 2002, 92: 451-459. 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01547.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vasquez A, Jakobsson T, Ahrne S, Forsum U, Molin G: Vaginal Lactobacillus flora of healthy Swedish women. J Clin Microbiol. 2002, 40: 2746-2749. 10.1128/JCM.40.8.2746-2749.2002.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Falsen E, Pascual C, Sjoden B, Ohlen M, Collins MD: Phenotypic and phylogenetic characterization of a novel Lactobacillus species from human sources: description of Lactobacillus iners sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1999, 49: 217-221.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Burton JP, Cadieux PA, Reid G: Improved understanding of the bacterial vaginal microbiota of women before and after probiotic instillation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003, 69: 97-101. 10.1128/AEM.69.1.97-101.2003.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Antonio MAD, Rabe LK, Hillier SL: Colonization of the rectum by Lactobacillus species and decreased risk of bacterial vaginosis. J Infect Dis. 2005, 192: 394-398. 10.1086/430926.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL: Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of Gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol. 1991, 29: 297-301.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Byun R, Nadkarni MA, Chhour KL, Martin FE, Jacques NA, Hunter N: Quantitative analysis of diverse Lactobacillus species present in advanced dental caries. J Clin Microbiol. 2004, 42: 3128-3136. 10.1128/JCM.42.7.3128-3136.2004.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Giorgi A, Torriani S, Dellaglio F, Bo G, Stola E, Bernuzzi L: Identification of vaginal lactobacilli from asymptomatic women. Microbiologica. 1987, 10: 377-384.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/7/128/prepub
Pre-publication history
Copyright
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
