Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Risk factor analysis for extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacter cloacaebloodstream infections in central Taiwan

BMC Infectious Diseases201313:417

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-417

Received: 19 January 2013

Accepted: 27 August 2013

Published: 8 September 2013

Abstract

Background

Enterobacter cloacae (E.cloacae) bloodstream infection (EcBSI) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality, with an increasing incidence in our hospital. We wanted to elucidate the risk factors of mortality among patients with ESBL-positive EcBSI in central Taiwan.

Methods

We ordered the clinical and microbiological data of cases with diagnosis of EcBSI, and analyzed the isolates by using antibiotyping, detection of ESBL, detection of class 1 integron and genomic fingerprinting by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE).

Results

Seventy episodes of EcBSI from 70 patients (56 hospital-acquired infections) were enrolled. Significant differences were found between ESBL-positive and ESBL-negative isolates with regard to risk factors, including the diseases severity (p = 0.03), category of health care-associated infection (p = 0.04), prior use of antibiotics (p = 0.023), and prior use of a ventilator (p = 0.037). A significant difference in mortality between two groups (p = 0.004) was determined using the chi-square test, and a trend in mortality between two groups (p = 0.006, OR = 4.750, 95% C.I.=1.573-14.344) was determined using univariate logistic regression analysis. The predominant clone in ESBL-positive strains was associated with a higher mortality rate but not with the presence of the integron.

Conclusions

The study disclosed four types of clinical characteristics to obtain ESBL-positive EcBSI, and there was a trend in mortality too. We suggested the need to review antibiotic prescription practices, and the possible need to consider ESBL-positive strains in empirical treatment of bloodstream infection.

Keywords

Enterobacter cloacae Class 1 integron Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase Mortality Risk factors Bloodstream infections

Background

Enterobacter cloacae (E. cloacae) is the most frequently isolated species of Enterobacter, which is a genus within the family Enterobacteriaceae [1] that causes infections in hospitalized and debilitated patients and has emerged as an important bacterial pathogen in recent years [2]. E. cloacae bloodstream infection (EcBSI) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in both developing and developed countries, especially Taiwan [3, 4].

In the last 20 years, extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) have attained great medical importance [5]. With regard to the expression mechanism, bacterial class 1 integrons, such as IntI1 integron, contain a site-specific recombination system able to capture and express genes as gene cassettes [6], and most cassette-integrated β-lactamase genes, such as bla VEB-1 and bla GES-1, encode β-lactamases [7, 8]. Jiang et al. found that 12 clonally related E. cloacae isolates from the China possessed a novel bla VEB-3-type beta-lactamase that was located in an integron [9], and some studies have reported that Taiwan E. cloacae strains contain the bla Imp-8 and bla SHV-12 genes [3, 4].

The isolation rate of E. cloacae has increased since 1995 at the hospital in Taiwan evaluated in the present study. Preliminary findings suggested an increased prevalence of E. cloacae that was associated with high mortality from E. cloacae infection and high prevalence of the IntI1 integron; thus, in the present study, we surveyed the ESBLs and integrons of E. cloacae. We collected the clinical and microbiological data of cases with a diagnosis of EcBSI and analyzed the isolates by antibiotyping, detection of ESBLs, detection of the class 1 integron and genomic fingerprinting by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). The goal of the study was to elucidate the risk factors for mortality among patients with ESBL-positive EcBSI in central Taiwan.

Methods

Hospital setting and data collection

The study hospital is an 1800-bed teaching hospital located in the center of Changhua in central Taiwan. A cross-sectional retrospective study of EcBSI was conducted by the division of infectious diseases of the study hospital from January 1, 2001 through December 31, 2003. The clinical details were recorded, and any mention of risk factors (only those predating the infection) was recorded. The severity of the underlying disease was categorized using the criteria of McCabe & Jackson [10]. The source of infection was determined according to clinical and microbiological evidence and categorized according to its site of origination. All patients with documented EcBSI at the hospital were enrolled during the study period. Repeated isolation of E. cloacae within a two-week period was defined as one episode of EcBSI. Only the first isolate obtained from each patient was studied. The exclusion criteria included inadequate data and misidentification. The ESBL-positive and ESBL-negative groups were defined according to the microbiological reports. The integron groups were defined according to the results of IntI1 gene detection. Health care-associated infection (HAI) was defined according to criteria of the Center of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [11]; in particular, HAI was defined when all CDC-defined conditions for site-specific infection were first present together on or after the third day of admission in the hospital.

Ethical approval

The collection of these data as described above was approved by the Ethics Committee of Changhua Christian Hospital (the reference number is CCH 121,112).

Microbiological investigation

Blood cultures were performed for every patient with suspected sepsis using the BACTEC NR-860 system (Becton Dickinson Diagnostic Instrument Systems, Franklin Lake, NJ). E. cloacae was presumptively identified using colonial morphology, Gram staining and routine biochemical reactions, and the identification was confirmed using the API-20NE kit (Bio Merieux Vitek, Hazelwood, Mo). Routine antibiotic sensitivity testing using β-lactams (amoxicillin-clavulanate, piperacillin-tazobactam, cefazolin, cefuroxime, flomoxef, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, cefepime and imipenem-cilastatin), aminoglycosides (amikacin, gentamicin and tobramycin), fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacins and ofloxacin) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was performed using the disk diffusion method (BBL, Sensi-Disc; Becton Dickinson, Cockeysville, MD), according to the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [12]. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for confirmation and detection of ESBLs was performed on the Vitek-2 System (Biomerieux, Hazlewood, Mo.), which has been shown to be 99% sensitive and specific for the detection of ESBLs [13].

Molecular detection of IntI1

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed for all E. cloacae for detection of IntI1. Koeleman’s previously described method was used to amplify the target genes [14]. IntI1 F (5′-CAGTGGACATAAGCCTGTTC-3′) and R (5′-CCCGAGGCATAGACTGTA-3′) primers were used to detect the IntI1 gene. PCR amplification was conducted in 20-μL volumes containing 0.25 μL template DNA, 0.025 mM deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTP), 1 μL 10 K PCR buffer, 1U Taq polymerase (Perkin-Elmer Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA), 1.5 mM MgCl2 and each primer at a concentration of 0.5 μM. PCR amplification was performed using a PTC-200 Gradient Peltier Thermal Cycler (MJ Research, Waltham, MA). The amplification products were resolved by electrophoresis at 125 V for 1 h on a 1.5% agarose gel in 0.5 × Tris-borate-EDTA buffer containing ethidium bromide, followed by visualization under UV light. All PCR amplifications were performed in duplicate.

PFGE analysis

Genomic DNA isolated from E. cloacae was digested using XbaI (Takara Bio Co., Japan), and the standard PFGE protocol for E. cloacae was followed according to Fernández’s procedure [15]. Briefly, E. cloacae isolates were grown on blood agar plates incubated in 5% CO2 at 35°C for 16 to 24 h. Plug slices with a width of 2 mm were digested using 20 U of XbaI. The DNA fragments were then separated in 1% Seakem Gold agarose gel (FMC BioProducts) at 14°C using a Bio-Rad CHEF DRIII (Bio-Rad Laboratories) in 0.5 × Tris-borate-EDTA (TBE; pH 8) at a 120° fixed angle using a fixed voltage (6 V/cm) and pulse time intervals from 2.2 to 54.2 s for 22 h. XbaI-digested genomic DNA fragments of S. enterica ser. Braenderup H9812 were used as reference size markers. After staining and destaining of the gel, it was exposed on a LJV transilluminator, and the image was captured digitally using a gel documentation system (Alphalmager 2000; Alpha Innotech Corporation, San Leandro, Calif.). The interpretation criteria were described previously by Tenover [16].

Statistical analysis

Either the chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test was used for analysis. The results were considered significant when P < 0.05. All data were analyzed using SPSS software v10.0.

Results

Eighty patients with a diagnosis of EcBSI were identified during the study period, but 10 patients were excluded because of inadequate data. Seventy-eight E. cloacae isolates were recovered from the remaining 70 patients, and only the first isolate obtained from each patient was studied. Fifty-six of the EcBSI isolates were identified as HAI, and the remainder was undefined because the patients were referred from either a local hospital or the community. Overall, 20 of 70 E. cloacae isolates possessed ESBL, and 49 of them possessed the IntI1 gene.

The demographics of the 20 patients with ESBL-positive EcBSI are presented in Additional file 1. The male to female ratio was 8:12, and the age range was 0–82 years. Fourteen of the 20 patients with ESBL-positive EcBSI had fever. The initial presentation of the 20 patients included abdominal pain(5 patients), shortness of breath(4), conscious disturbance(4), hematuria(2), deafness(1), flank pain(1), chest pain(1), dysuria(1), and limb weakness(1). Three of them developed shock at initial presentation. Only three of them had received effective empirical antibiotic treatment at the early stage of EcBSI. Twelve of the 20 patients (60%) died. Nine of the 12 deaths directly resulted from the EcBSI (Additional file 1).

The results of the risk factor analysis are listed in Table 1. There was a significant difference between the ESBL-positive and ESBL-negative groups with regard to disease severity (p = 0.03), category of HAI (p = 0.04), prior use of antibiotics (p = 0.023) and prior use of a ventilator (p = 0.037). Table 2 shows the analysis of the clinical presentation in patients with ESBL-positive and ESBL-negative isolates. In patients with ESBL-negative isolates, the male to female ratio was 29:21. Overall, urinary tract infection was the only factor significantly different between patients with ESBL-positive isolates and those with ESBL-negative isolates, either in clinical presentation or microbiological characteristics. As shown in Table 3, there was a significant difference in mortality between patients with ESBL-positive isolates and those with ESBL-negative isolates (p = 0.004), and mortality tended to be different between patients with ESBL-positive isolates and those with ESBL-negative isolates (p = 0.006, OR = 4.750, 95% C.I.=1.573-14.344) in the univariate logistic regression analysis. Forty-nine of the 70 isolates (70%) carried the IntI1 gene, and 18 of the 49 patients (36.7%) with these isolates died. There was no significant difference between patients with integron-positive E. cloacae and those with integron-negative isolates (Table 3).
Table 1

Analysis of the risk factors between 20 patients with ESBL-positive EcBSI and 50 patients with ESBL-negative EcBSI

  

ESBL-negative E. cloacae

ESBL-positive E. cloacae

p-value

Total number

Total number

Underlying disease

Diabetes mellitus

 

14

6

 

Liver cirrhosis

 

5

2

 

Cancer

 

12

5

 

Uremia

 

3

1

 

McCabe category

A

19

5

0.03

B

19

5

 

C

12

10

 

Belong to Health care-associated infection

 

36

20

0.04

Invasive procedures before E. cloacae infection

 

4

20

0.481

Chemotherapy before E. cloacae infection

 

1

2

0.482

Operation before E. cloacae infection

 

15

1

0.481

Usage of central venous catheter before E. cloacae infection

 

50

20

0.464

Usage of peripheral catheter before E. cloacae infection

 

50

20

0.301

Usage of arterial catheter before E. cloacae infection

 

24

18

0.857

Usage of Swan-Guan catheter before E. cloacae infection

 

4

3

0.481

Usage of total parenteral nutrition before E. cloacae infection

 

35

17

0.65

Usage of antibiotics before E. cloacae infection

 

46

17

0.023

Usage of ventilator before E. cloacae infection

 

47

19

0.037

Usage of Foley catheter

 

42

20

0.657

P-value by chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test when appropriate.

Table 2

Clinical presentation between ESBL-positive EcBSI and ESBL-negative EcBSI

  

ESBL(−)

ESBL(+)

P-value

 

Integron(−)

Integron(+)

  

Integron(−)

Integron(+)

  
  

Total

N

%

N

%

P-value

Total

N

%

N

%

P-value

 

Sex

Male

29

9

31.0

20

69.0

0.851

8

2

25.0

6

75.0

1.000

1.000

Female

21

6

28.6

15

71.4

 

12

4

33.3

8

66.7

 

1.000

Previous antibiotics at the empirical stage before

No

24

1

5.0

23

95.0

1.000

17

7

41.2

10

58.8

1.000

0.023

E. cloacae infection

Yes

26

16

61.0

10

39.0

 

3

1

33.3

2

66.7

  

Prognosis

Survival

38

18

47.4

20

52.6

0.874

8

2

25.0

6

75.0

1.000

0.435

Expired

12

6

50.0

6

50.0

 

12

2

16.7

10

83.3

 

0.193

Type of infection

Primary

1

0

0.0

1

100.0

1.000

5

2

0.0

3

100.0

1.000

 

Secondary

49

9

18.4

40

81.6

 

15

4

21.1

11

78.9

 

1.000

Secondary infection (multiple)

Total

49

19

 

30

  

15

5

 

10

   

Respiratory tract

30

10

33.3

20

66.7

0.326

3

1

33.3

2

66.7

0.370

1.000

Urinary tract

12

2

16.7

10

83.3

0.095

6

1

 

5

 

0.023

1.000

Catheter-related

2

0

0.0

2

100.0

0.515

0

0

0.0

0

100.0

1.000

 

Intra-abdominal infection

9

2

22.2

7

77.8

0.451

6

0

0.0

6

100.0

0.474

1.000

CNS infection

3

1

33.3

2

66.7

1.000

0

0

0.0

0

0.0

  
 

Others

3

1

33.3

2

66.7

1.000

0

0

0.0

0

00

0.474

1.000

P-value by chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test when appropriate.

Table 3

Univariate logistic regression analysis for mortality between ESBL-positive EcBSI and ESBL-negative EcBSI

  

Total

Expired

P-value*

Univariate logistic regression analysis

N

%

B

SE

OR

95% CI for OR

P-value

Overall

ESBL(−)

50

12

24.0

0.004

1.558

0.564

1.000

1.573

-

14.344

0.006

ESBL(+)

20

12

60.0

4.750

ESBL(−)

Integron(−)

24

6

25.0

0.874

−0.105

0.662

1.000

0.246

-

3.297

0.874

Integron(+)

26

6

23.1

0.900

ESBL(+)

Integron(−)

4

2

50.0

1.000

0.511

1.125

1.000

0.184

-

15.130

0.650

Integron(+)

16

10

62.5

1.667

*:by chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test when appropriate.

OR: odds ratio.

All 13 strains tested (11 ESBL-positive and 2 ESBL-negative) were typeable. Ten ESBL-positive isolates from expired patients and one each from an ESBL-positive isolate from a survivor, an ESBL-negative isolate from an expired patient and an ESBL-negative from a survivor were analyzed to investigate differences in clinical outcome between ESBL-positive and ESBL-negative strains and to establish the major clones. The fingerprints generated using XbaI restriction endonucleases are shown in Figure 1. There was no evidence of clonal dissemination during the three years of the study. The predominant clone was found in most of the ESBL-positive strains.
Figure 1

PFGE fingerprints of 11 ESBL(+) E. cloacae isolates and 2 ESBL(−) E. cloacae isolates after digestion with the Xba I restriction enzyme. Lane 1 to lane 10, ESBL(+) E. cloacae isolates; lane 11 to lane 13, ESBL(−)E. cloacae isolates; lane M, molecular size markers (PFGE marker, S. enterica ser.Braenderup H9812).

Discussion

E. cloacae bloodstream infection is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in both developing and developed countries. In our hospital, an increasing incidence and a high crude mortality rate (24/70, 34.3%) led us to investigate the epidemiology of this infection, particularly with regard to ESBL, and to determine whether clonal spreading occurred.

In a previous epidemiological study of E. cloacae infection, Liu showed that central venous catheterization and mechanical ventilation increased the relative risk for nosocomial E. cloacae infection; that age and mechanical ventilation were risk factors for multiresistant E. cloacae infection; and that mortality was associated with multiresistant isolates and polymicrobial infection [4]. These risk factors were similar to those identified in our study, which included disease severity (p = 0.03), category of hospital-acquired infection (p = 0.04), prior use of antibiotics (p = 0.023) and prior use of a ventilator (p = 0.037). We also demonstrate that mortality tended to be different (p = 0.006, OR = 4.750, 95% C.I.=1.573-14.344) between infections with ESBL-positive E. cloacae and those with ESBL-negative E. cloacae.

ESBL-expressing E. cloacae present a challenge for clinical microbiologists and clinicians because of the high morbidity and mortality associated with infection. In our study, some ESBL-positive stains were sensitive to imipenem-cilstatin. However, there have already been reports of therapeutic failures of imipenem-cilstatin in strains that produce multiple β-lactamases [17]. The high mortality rate observed for ESBL-positive EcBSI likely results from this difficulty in treatment. In the present study, there was a significant difference in mortality between patients with ESBL-positive EcBSI and those with ESBL-negative EcBSI (p = 0.004), and mortality tended to be different between patients with ESBL-positive EcBSI and those with ESBL-negative EcBSI (p = 0.006, OR = 4.750, 95% C.I. = 1.573-14.344) in a univariate logistic regression analysis. These findings may be attributed to the fact that 17 of the 20 patients with ESBL-positive EcBSI did not receive effective empirical antibiotic treatment, whereas 46 of the 50 patients with ESBL-negative isolates did receive effect antibiotic treatment.

This is the first study to report the relationship between ESBLs and an integron in E. cloacae. There was no significant difference between patients with integron-positive EcBSI and those with integron-negative EcBSI. However, mortality tended to be different between patients with ESBL-positive EcBSI and those with ESBL-negative EcBSI (p = 0.004). The development and spread of ESBL-positive EcBSI has been suggested to be caused by the overuse of expanded-spectrum cephalosporins in the hospital setting [3]. We agree with this mechanism but also consider that the epidemiology of ESBL-positive EcBSI requires further investigation. We observed a high prevalence (70%) of the integron, which also raises the question of whether antibiotic selective pressure in hospitals in Taiwan may have led to the dissemination of this integron, which contains an ESBL-carrying cassette. β-lactam, aminoglycoside and sulfonamide resistance genes are all associated with class 1 integrons and may enhance the dissemination of these integrons. Similar to Severino [18], we suggest that integron detection should be used for the study of molecular epidemiology in hospital environments, particularly for the detection of possible cross-infection cases and estimation of accumulative antibiotic selective pressure.

The increased prevalence of E. cloacae and its association with high EcBSI mortality and high prevalence of IntI1 motivated us to perform PFGE, which is an auxiliary investigation method for E. cloacae isolates that has high reproducibility and high discriminatory power and is thus regarded as the “gold standard” for defining a clone in various nosocomial bacterial populations [2, 19]. The predominant clone was associated with increased mortality that was most likely related to ESBL production; however, the predominant clone was not associated with the presence of the integron. Clonal spread was not observed, and the class 1 integron was not a major factor in the increased incidence of ESBL-positive E. cloacae in the study hospital. Ho et al. used PFGE genotyping to show that seven ESBL- positive E. hormaechei isolates were unrelated [20]. Our results are similar and show a lack of clonal outbreak during the three years of the study. The predominant clone seemed to be associated with increased mortality and ESBL expression but not with the presence of the integron.

Although the bacterial isolates were collected between 2001 and 2003, as the clinical pattern of EcBSI did not show obvious changes in our institute within the last decade (2002–2012), the results are still relevant for clinical application at the present time and agree with the findings of Freeam [21].

Conclusions

This study identified four types of clinical characteristics for ESBL-positive EcBSI, and increased mortality was associated with the presence of ESBL, which most likely resulted from inappropriate empirical treatment. We suggest that it is necessary to review antibiotic prescription practices and possibly consider ESBL-positive strains in the empirical treatment of bloodstream infections.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Changhua Christian Hospital for the kind gift of the clinical E. cloacae strains. The authors thank LC Lin, CW Huang, and WC Chu for technical assistance. The authors thank CS Choiu and JC Laiu of the Central Branch Office of the Center for Disease Control, Taichung. The authors thank Biomerieux for technical assistance with the Vitek-2 system. The authors thank YJ Chang for statistical assistance. The authors thank Min-Chi Lu, M.D.,Ph.D., and Carolyn Hsu, Ph.D. for polishing the manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Changhua Christian Hospital
(2)
Department of Nursing, College of Medicine & Nursing, Hung Kuang University
(3)
College of Life Science, National Chung Hsing University

References

  1. Farmer JJ: Enterobacteriaceae: introduction and identification. Manual of clinical microbiology. Edited by: Murray PR, Baron EJ, Tenover FC, Yolken RH. 1999, Washington, D.C: American Society for Microbiology, 442-458. 7Google Scholar
  2. Jalaluddin S, Devaster JM, Scheen R, Gerard M, Butzler JP: Molecular epidemiological study of nosocomial Enterobacter aerogenes isolates in a Belgian hospital. J Clin Microbiol. 1998, 36: 1846-1852.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Ma L, Chang FY, Fung CP, Chen TL, Lin JC, Lu PL, Huang LY, Chang JC, Siu LK: Variety of TEM-, SHV-, and CTX-M-type beta-lactamases present in recent clinical isolates of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterobacter cloacae from Taiwan. Microb Drug Resist. 2005, 11: 31-39. 10.1089/mdr.2005.11.31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Liu CP, Wang NY, Lee CM, Weng LC, Tseng HK, Liu CW, Chiang CS, Huang FY: Nosocomial and community-acquired Enterobacter cloacae bloodstream infection: risk factors for and prevalence of SHV-12 in multiresistant isolates in a medical centre. J Hosp Infect. 2004, 58: 63-77. 10.1016/j.jhin.2004.04.019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Patricia A: Bradford. extended-spectrum β-lactamases in the 21st century: characterization, epidemiology, and detection of this important resistance threat. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001, 14: 933-995. 10.1128/CMR.14.4.933-951.2001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Bennett PM: Integrons and gene cassette: a genetic construction kit for bacteria. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1999, 43: 1-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Poirel L, Naas T, Nicolas D, Collet L, Bellais S, Cavallo JD, Nordmann P: Characterization of VIM-2, a carbapenem-hydrolyzing metallo-β-lactamase and its plasmid- and integron-borne gene from a pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolate in France. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000, 44: 891-897. 10.1128/AAC.44.4.891-897.2000.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Girlich D, Poirel L, Leelaporn A, Karim A, Tribuddharat C, Fennewald M, Girlich D: Molecular epidemiology of the integron-located VEB-1 extended-spectrum beta-lactamase in nosocomial enterobacterial isolates in Bangkok, Thailand. J Clin Microbiol. 2001, 39: 175-182. 10.1128/JCM.39.1.175-182.2001.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Jiang X, Ni Y, Jiang Y, Yuan F, Han L, Li M, Liu H, Yang L, Lu Y: Outbreak of infection caused by Enterobacter cloacae producing the novel VEB-3 beta-lactamase in China. J Clin Microbiol. 2005, 43: 826-831. 10.1128/JCM.43.2.826-831.2005.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. McCabe W, Jackson CG: Gram negative bacteremia I. etiology and ecology. Arch Intern Med. 1962, 36: 1020-1027.Google Scholar
  11. Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA: CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control. 2008, 36: 309-332. 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.03.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI): Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically: approved standard. 2012, USA: CLSI: Document M7-A9. Wayne, PA, 6Google Scholar
  13. Sanders CC, Barry AL, Washington JA, Shubert C, Moland ES, Traczewski MM, Knapp C, Mulder R: Detection of extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing members of the family Enterobacteriaceae with the Vitek ESBL test. J Clin Microbiol. 1996, 34: 2997-3001.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Koeleman JG, Stoof J, Van Der Bijl MW, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CM, Savelkoul PH: Identification of epidemic strains of acinetobacter baumannii by integrase gene PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2001, 39: 8-13. 10.1128/JCM.39.1.8-13.2001.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Fernández A, Pereira MJ, Suárez JM, Poza M, Treviño M, Villalón P, Sáez-Nieto JA, Regueiro BJ, Villanueva R, Bou G: Emergence in Spain of a multidrug-resistant Enterobacter cloacae clinical isolate producing SFO-1 extended-spectrum β-lactamase. J Clin Microbiol. 2011, 49: 822-828. 10.1128/JCM.01872-10.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Turnover FC: Plasmid fingerprinting: a tool for bacterial strain identification and surveillance of nosocomial and community-acquired infections. Clin Lab Med. 1985, 5: 413-436.Google Scholar
  17. Ahmad M, Urban C, Mariano N, Bradford PA, Calcagni E, Projan SJ, Bush K, Rahal JJ: Clinical characteristics and molecular epidemiology associated with imipenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Clin Infect Dis. 1999, 29: 352-355. 10.1086/520214.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Severino P, Magalhães VD: Integrons as tools for epidemiological studies. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004, 10: 156-162. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.00769.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Richard VG: Molecular epidemiology of nosocomial infection: analysis of chromosomal restriction fragment patterns by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1993, 14: 595-600. 10.1086/646645.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Ho PL, Shek RH, Chow KH, Duan RS, Mak GC, Lai EL, Yam WC, Tsang KW, Lai WM: Detection and characterization of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases among bloodstream isolates of Enterobacter spp. in Hong Kong, 2000-2002. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005, 55: 326-332. 10.1093/jac/dki010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Freeman JT, McBride SJ, Nisbet MS, Gamble GD, Williamson DA, Taylor SL, Holland DJ: Bloodstream infection with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae at a tertiary care hospital in New Zealand: risk factors and outcomes. Int J Infect Dis. 2012, 16: e371-e374.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/13/417/prepub

Copyright

© Chen and Huang; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.