This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Incidence and risk factors of herpes zoster among hiv-positive patients in the german competence network for HIV/AIDS (KompNet): a cohort study analysis
© Jansen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 11 January 2013
Accepted: 5 August 2013
Published: 10 August 2013
HIV infection is a risk factor for the development of Herpes zoster (HZ) and its complications. Prior to antiretroviral therapy (ART), HZ incidence in HIV-infected individuals ranged from 2.9–5.1/100 person-years. There is limited evidence for the impact of ART on HZ occurrence among HIV-infected adults. We analysed the incidence of, and risk factors for, HZ in a large cohort of German HIV-positive patients.
The study population was taken from the German KompNet cohort, a nationwide multicenter HIV cohort study. The study population was defined by age (≥ 18 years), year of first positive HIV diagnosis, CD4 values ± 6 months from HIV diagnosis (t0), and month of HZ diagnosis. Incidences were estimated using a Poisson distribution, and uni- and multivariate Cox proportional Hazard ratio (HR) regression models were fitted to identify risk factors for developing an initial HZ episode. Independent variables were sex, age at HIV diagnosis, route of HIV transmission, ART status, CD4 count before HZ episode, immunosuppressive medication, and mode of data documentation (retrospective or prospective).
HZ incidence in the overall study population was 1.2/100 person-years. In a subset of patients for that we were able to examine risk factors the following was observed: We examined 3,757 individuals whose mean age at t0 was 38 years. Of those individuals, 96% were diagnosed with HIV in 1996 or later, with a mean observation time of 5.8 years. HZ episodes (n = 362) were recorded in 326 patients (8.7%), resulting in annual HZ incidences of 1.7/100 person-years overall, and 1.6/100 person-years for initial HZ cases. The main risk factors associated with an initial HZ episode were: not partaking in ART compared with an ART regimen containing a non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (HR 0.530, p < 0.001) or a protease inhibitor (HR 0.624, p = 0.004); and lower CD4 count by 100 cells/μl (HR 0.918, p=0.001).
HZ incidence was 4-11-fold higher than in non HIV-infected individuals, but in our study HZ incidences were lower than in previous studies relating to HIV-positive patients. We showed that ART is an important protective factor for HZ episodes.
KeywordsHerpes zoster HIV Highly active antiretroviral therapy Risk factor analysis
Herpes zoster (HZ) is the clinical manifestation resulting from the reactivation of the varicella zoster virus (VZV), and can be a debilitating illness. The incidence of HZ in the general population is around 0.15–0.33/100 person-years [1–4], with a higher incidence (0.5–0.9/100 person-years) in individuals aged 50–80 years . Incidence increases with age, along with certain conditions that impair cell-mediated immunity. HZ can be severe, resulting in hospitalisation; in some cases serious complications can occur. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is a risk factor for the development of HZ and its complications . In cohort studies conducted before the introduction of highly active anti-retroviral therapy (ART), the annual incidence of HZ in HIV-infected people ranged from 2.9–5.1/100 person-years [7–11]. The overall age-adjusted risk of HZ is at least 15-fold higher in homosexual men infected with HIV than in uninfected men without HIV . The advent of ART has seen mortality in HIV-infected patients dramatically decline, and has reduced the incidence of the most common opportunistic infections. However, ART appears to have little effect on the incidence of HZ [12, 13] in most groups other than children [14–19]. Results from a recent study suggested a general protective effect of modern ART regimens . There is limited evidence for the impact of ART on the occurrence of HZ among HIV-infected adults. In this study, we analysed the incidence of, and risk factors for, HZ among HIV-infected patients within the German Competence Network for HIV/AIDS (KompNet). KompNet is an open, retrospective and prospective, multicentre disease-specific and nationwide cohort study funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [21, 22].
Study population and data collection
The study population was selected from HIV-infected patients within the KompNet cohort. The cohort study was approved by the relevant ethical committees for all participating centres and was compliant with the Helsinki declaration. Between June 2004 and September 2007, the KompNet cohort comprised 44 documenting sites (21 outpatient clinics and 23 private practitioners) and included 15,381 subjects with HIV/AIDS. In September 2007, it was reduced to 25 documenting sites (10 outpatient clinics, 15 private practitioners) and 8,162 subjects. Most patients were recruited between autumn 2005 and autumn 2006. Cohort participants had approximately two visits annually. During these visits multiple clinical, laboratory, and sociodemographic variables were collected prospectively . The interval length between visits ranged 4–8 months; serum samples were collected at all visits, however, cells were collected for storage at enrolment and 3 years after enrolment. Data was collected prospectively (i.e. at enrollment into the cohort), in addition chart reviews were performed and data was collected retrospectively when available on patients who attend the KompNet clinical sites before enrolment. The starting point for retrospective data collection was the time of HIV diagnosis (referred to as t0).
The analyses described in this report contain data collected from 1 January 1985 until 1 July 2010.
Identification of HZ cases
In the cohort database, the incidence of HZ cases were coded as monosegmental, multisegmental, multisegmental recurring HZ, or a current HZ episode without other specifications. Cases of HZ were mostly diagnosed on clinical grounds. Additional available documentation of a “condition after Herpes zoster” was used only for validating initial episodes of HZ. For all patients diagnosed with HZ we checked if there was a prior documented diagnosis of “condition after Herpes zoster” or a prior diagnosis of HZ without a documented month. If either were true, patients were excluded from all analyses on initial HZ cases.
HZ cases associated with Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome (IRIS) following the initiation of ART were investigated. HZ cases were considered to be associated with IRIS if HZ was diagnosed within 3 months following commencement of ART in ART-naïve patients. If ART-naïvety could not be ascertained, a corresponding variable was imputed as missing value.
Baseline characteristics were described by frequencies and percentages or by means, standard deviations and ranges, depending on their distributions. Baseline characteristics were compared between the Cox subpopulation and all other patients of the total study population using the χ2- and t-tests. The incidence of HZ was calculated for the whole cohort at risk during the study period, based on both historical and prospectively collected data. Single and multiple diagnoses per patients were considered, with incidences of all HZ cases estimated as events by person-years under risk from HIV diagnosis to last date of follow-up or death. Incidences and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated assuming a Poisson distribution. HZ incidences in the Cox subpopulation, and the overall study population, were compared by fitting a Poisson regression model with a group indicator as the independent variable. Incidences were stratified by age (10-year age groups calculated by calendar year). Cumulative probabilities of initial HZ episodes depending on time since HIV diagnosis were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method for the Cox-subpopulation.
To determine specific risk factors for time dependent analyses with respect to an initial HZ episode from the time of HIV diagnosis, Cox proportional hazard regression models were fitted . For subjects without any record of a HZ episode, the last observation was taken as censored time of the patient (including death). To avoid bias for the few patients with extremely long observation times, the time under risk was truncated at a fixed maximum value (17.5 years) where at least 10 patients of the cohort were still at risk. Independent variables included baseline characteristics (sex, age at HIV diagnosis, probable route of infection) and time-dependent variables (ART status, CD4 count before the HZ episode, CD4 nadir, adjuvant medications, and mode of documentation).
CD4 values between two follow-up visits, ART status and immunosuppressive medication were assigned using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) principle. All independent variables (continuous or categorised) were first assessed in univariate models. Significant risk factors (p < 0.05), or those considered medically important, were then combined in a multivariate model. Some unreasonable variable combinations were excluded from multivariate models; time on ART, and different ART regimen types were not combined in one model, as periods on different ART regimen would then need to be separated. Additional bivariate models were fitted to adjust for univariate models with retrospective documentation. Gender and age were included as possible confounders in the final model to calculate age- and sex-adjusted results. Results were considered statistically significant when p-values were less than 0.05, and all test and confidence intervals were calculated as two-sided unless stated otherwise. Statistical analyses were performed using the statistical software package SAS 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, USA).
Baseline characteristics of patients in the overall cohort population and in the Cox-subpopulation
Mean age at HIV diagnosis (t0)
35.1 years (SD: 10.2) (range 0.0-77.3)
37.8 years (SD: 10.2) (range 14.1-77.3)
Proportion of men
84.9% (17 missing)
85.9% (2 missing)
Proportion of MSM
63.5% (101 missing)
66.4% (28 missing)
Proportion of IV drug users
6.6% (101 missing)
3.0% (28 missing)
Mean duration between HIV diagnosis and inclusion in the cohort
7.5 years (SD: 6.0)
2.8 years (SD 3.2)
Mean duration between HIV diagnosis and last clinical data
10.1 years (SD: 6.3)
5.8 years (SD: 3.9)
Proportion of timepoint of HIV-diagnosis ≥ 1996
Infectious comorbidities at HIV diagnosis (excluding HZ)
HZ episodes within the study populations
Patients with an HZ episode
Number of HZ episodes
AIDS-defining event prior to HZ episode 1
22.1% (44 missing)
18.2% (5 missing)
18.4% (5 missing)
Mean CD4-value/μl at time of HZ-episode
441 (SD: 259) (596 missing)
434 (SD: 244) (22 missing)
423 (SD: 240) (20 missing)
Mean CD4-nadir/μl prior to HZ-episode
292 (SD: 208) (596 missing)
275 (SD: 194) (22 missing)
274 (SD: 193) (20 missing)
Infectious comorbidities at time of HZ episode
Possibly IRIS associated HZ
4.14% (366 missing)
6.19% (55 missing)
6.96% (53 missing)
HZ incidence within the study populations
All HZ cases
All HZ cases
Initial HZ cases
Total cumulative person years
Total incidence (per 100 PY) (95% confidence intervals)
Age stratified incidence (95% confidence intervals)
≥ 50 years
Univariate and multivariate analysis of risk factors associated with HZ infection
Hazard ratios(95%CI)in univariate1models
Hazard ratios(95%CI)in one multivariate model
Male (versus female) 2
0.952 (0.703, 1.290)
0.949 (0.697, 1.291)
Age (1 year change)
1.002 (0.991, 1.013)
1.002 (0.991, 1.013)
MSM (versus no MSM)
1.145 (0.905, 1.448)
ART naïve, time on ART:
0.640 (0.455, 0.902)
0.926 (0.640, 1.339)
Time on ART
0.990 (0.897, 1.093)
(1 year change)
No ART (reference)
ART naïve, time on ART classified:
ART-experienced < 1year
Time on ART 1-<2 years
Time on ART 2-<3 years
Time on ART 3-<4 years
Time on ART > 4- years
No ART (reference)
ART regimen, specific
0.557 (0.396, 0.783)
0.530 (0.375, 0.748)
0.703 (0.512, 0.965)
0.624 (0.451, 0.862)
Regimen with other
0.717 (0.469, 1.095)
0.729 (0.469, 1.131)
1.153 (0.716, 1.859)
1.108 (0.686, 1.789)
No ART (reference)
CD4-rise (of 100 cells/μl)
0.939 (0.898, 0.983)
0.918 (0.875, 0.963)
Immunosuppressive medication (yes versus no)
1.733 (1.060, 2.832)
1.510 (0.921, 2.477)
Retrospective documentation (yes versus no)
0.575 (0.452, 0.730)
0.582 (0.455, 0.745)
In all, the KompNet cohort offers a very good opportunity to undertake epidemiological studies of HIV-positive patients in Germany because of the comprehensive nature of its data collection. For time-dependent risk factor analyses, we defined a Cox subpopulation. The reason for this was to avoid bias due to a large number of patients with incomplete documentation for long periods after t0. A further concern was that in these periods, there was a higher probability that initial HZ episodes might be missed. As the first selection criterion, a documented CD4 count within a 6-month period before and after HIV diagnosis was implemented. This was used as an indicator for the beginning of a complete course of data documentation. Furthermore, subjects with a documentation interval greater than 6 months for either CD4 count or viral load data were excluded, because documented time of HIV diagnosis might no longer be valid.
The main socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of the overall study population and the Cox subpopulation were comparable, and reflected the previously reported epidemiological characteristics of HIV-positive patients in Germany with respect to age, sex, risk of transmission of HIV, origin, and dominance of MSM and geographical origin [21, 22, 24]. The statistical significance of the differences between both populations were primarily because of the large population size, however the sizes of the effects regarding these epidemiological characteristics were small.
While the use of specific populations for incidence analyses and Cox regression modelling offers a reliable methodological approach, the KompNet cohort has allowed us to study the incidence of HZ infection in a much larger group of patients, with the added ability of observing patients remaining free of HZ, in contrast with previous single-centre studies [12, 20].
In our study, the incidence of HZ was 1.2/100 person-years in the overall study population and 1.7/100 person-years in the Cox subpopulation. These figures are 3.6–11.3-fold higher than the 0.15–0.33/100 person-years reported for the general populations of several Western countries [1–5]. Regarding HIV-positive patients, a recent analysis by Blank et al.  showed an incidence of 0.9/100 person-years between 2002 and 2009, which is in contrast to earlier findings at the same HIV clinic (3.2/100 person-years between 1997 and 2001) . With a high proportion of patient observations in our cohort starting after 2001 (Cox subpopulation: 75%), the results of our study are similar to the latest findings by Blank et al. , however we used a different study design and statistical model. It is likely that the differences between previous studies and the results of our analyses reflect a more contemporary and likely composition of current ART regimens, resulting in improved immunological conditions and thereby higher CD4 counts.
We did not observe any statistically significant differences regarding incidences stratified by age group or calendar year in either of our study populations (data not shown). The impact of older age as a risk factor for HZ in the general population may be abrogated in HIV-positive patients by other risk factors, such as the age-independent impairment of the immune system. The more or less stable incidence over time is in line with other findings [12, 20] and suggests that HZ remains an important HIV-associated infection after the introduction and on-going improvement of ART options.
As expected, the mode of data documentation had some impact on the estimation of incidences. In the Cox-subpopulation, there was a small difference between the incidence of cases documented retrospectively and those documented prospectively. Further analysis using Cox regression and another stratification indicated an underestimation of the incidence in cases documented retrospectively, which was confirmed by sensitivity analyses. This may be due to a possible recall bias for long clinical histories documented retrospectively.
Kaplan Meier-analysis showed an exponential decline and therewith a more or less constant hazard for an initial HZ episode. Overall, the 10-year probability of remaining free of an initial HZ episode was 87.3%. We found that 10.7% of all HZ cases occurred at HIV diagnosis and might be the reason for HIV testing, while 25.8% of all cases were diagnosed within the first 6 months after HIV diagnosis. Of those, a relatively high proportion (26%) classifiable in terms of IRIS-related episodes had a HZ episode linked to IRIS.
We conducted Cox regression to identify risk factors for developing an initial HZ episode. In contrast to earlier studies , and in agreement with recent work , undertaking ART was one of the main protective factors in all our Cox regression models. A reason for this might be that the time of HIV diagnosis was defined as the starting point for estimating risk factors for a HZ episode, i.e. t0. This was much earlier than in other studies, where the starting point was often defined as the first time a subject attended a clinic, being partly clinically more progressed. Another reason could be that our analyses cover a more recent era of ART, and therefore highlight the potential benefits of modern ART regimens compared with those examined in earlier studies. In addition, our study population mainly comprised MSM, who are often highly compliant with respect to medical care and treatment, especially compared with intravenous drug users.
Constant use of immunosuppressive medication was not a risk factor in our multivariate models, probably because of their infrequent occurrence in the HIV-positive patients in our study populations. Our findings corresponded with those of Blank et al. , where an increase in the CD4 count was a protective factor, but with a more limited impact compared with ART. Unlike other opportunistic infections, HZ occurs at a wide range of CD4 counts in HIV-positive subjects . HZ episodes in HIV-infected patients are likely to be more severe than in non-HIV-infected subjects, and can also involve recurrent episodes, more than one dermatome, systemic manifestations, and complications such as post-herpetic neuralgia . In some cases, it may be the first sign of an HIV infection; while in other individuals recurrent episodes may represent progression of HIV infection [18, 25]. HIV-positive subjects who develop HZ infections are known to be at high risk for progression to AIDS and death [26, 27]. Therefore, an improved understanding of the incidence of and risk factors for HZ infection in HIV-positive patients has important implications for clinical practice. Our study not only clarifies the incidence in a population which reflects that seen in contemporary practice, it also indicates a positive impact of ART and increased CD4 count to avoid initial HZ episodes in HIV-positive patients.
However, our study does have some limitations. This was an observational study, and although we adjusted for available confounders including the mode of data documentation, other biases cannot be excluded. Our results regarding risk factors can only be interpreted as associations, not as causal relations. The documentation was partially retrospective, which may have contributed to a recall bias and underestimation of HZ incidence. We adjusted for this as best as possible by including a corresponding time-dependent co-variable in the Cox models. Furthermore, time-dependent CD4 values used in the Cox models were imputed using the LOCF principle between neighbouring measures or until the end of observation. This might be problematic for the time course if there are longer gaps for laboratory controls in some patients. There were 35 HZ cases at HIV diagnosis (t0), which may have differed from the cases during follow up. The multivariate Cox model was also fitted after excluding these 35 patients, and yielded the same result. This showed that these special HZ cases at HIV diagnosis did not bias the main results.
We have shown an annual HZ incidence of 1.2/100 person-years for the overall study population, and 1.7/100 person-years for the Cox subpopulation, which is 4–11-fold higher than for non HIV-infected individuals. Incidences in our study were lower than those in previous studies, but in agreement with recently published analyses. For a large study population, this study showed ART as the most important protective factor for HZ episodes.
First, we thank all the patients participating in our cohort for providing their data and biomaterials to the cohort. We are grateful for all the work and dedication of the documentation officers and of the heads of our documenting sites. We thank the Ruhr-University Bochum for financial and structural encouragement. Especially, we thank the Federal Ministry of Education and Research for its financial support from 2002 to 2011 (grant no. BMBF-01 KI 0501). We thank Michael Holland of Driftwood Publishing Ltd for medical writing services on behalf of KompNet and Jargo Jansen of GSK Biologicals for proofreading of the manuscript.
The following documenting sites contribute data to the KompNet cohort: Gemeinschaftspraxis Driesener Straße, Berlin; Gemeinschaftspraxis Mehringdamm, Berlin; Gemeinschaftspraxis Turmstraße, Berlin; Gemeinschaftspraxis Fuggerstraße, Berlin; Praxiszentrum Kaiserdamm, Berlin; Universitätsklinikum Benjamin Franklin, Charité, Berlin; Dermatologische Klinik, Ruhr-Universität, Bochum; Universitätsklinikum Dortmund; Universitätsklinikum, Düsseldorf; Medizinische Klinik 3, Universitätsklinikum, Erlangen; Klinik für Dermatologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen; HIVCENTER, Universitätsklinikum, Frankfurt; Ifi-Institut, Hamburg; ICH Grindelpraxis, Infektionsepidemiologisches Centrum, Hamburg; Medizinische Hochschule, Hannover; Praxis Georgstraße, Hannover; Gemeinschaftspraxis, Kriegsstraße, Karlsruhe, Städtisches Krankenhaus Kemperhof, Koblenz; Praxis Hohenstaufenring, Köln; Gemeinschaftspraxis Isartorplatz, München; MVZ Karlsplatz, HIV Research and Clinical Centre, München; Praxisgemeinschaft Franz Joseph-Straße, München; Klinikum, Osnabrück; Gemeinschaftspraxis Ulmer/Frietsch/Müller, Stuttgart.
- Kurland LT, Chu CP, Perry HO: Population-based study of herpes zoster and its sequelae. Medicine (Baltimore). 1982, 61 (5): 310-316.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gilden DH, Kleinschmidt-DeMasters BK, LaGuardia JJ, Mahalingam R, Cohrs RJ: Neurologic complications of the reactivation of varicella-zoster virus. N Engl J Med. 2000, 342: 635-645. 10.1056/NEJM200003023420906.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Donahue JG, Choo PW, Manson JE, Platt R: The incidence of herpes zoster. Arch Intern Med. 1995, 155: 1605-1609. 10.1001/archinte.1995.00430150071008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hope-Simpson RE: The nature of herpes zoster: a long-term study and a new hypothesis. Proc R Soc Med. 1965, 58: 9-20.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Johnson R, McElhaney J, Pedalino B, Levin M: Prevention of herpes zoster and its painful and debilitating complications. Int J Infect Dis. 2007, 11 (Suppl 2): S43-S48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thomas SL, Hall AJ: What does epidemiology tell us about risk factors for herpes zoster?. Lancet Infect Dis. 2004, 4: 26-33. 10.1016/S1473-3099(03)00857-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Buchbinder SP, Katz MH, Hessol NA, Liu JY, O'Malley PM, Underwood R, Holmberg SD: Herpes zoster and human immunodeficiency virus infection. J Infect Dis. 1992, 166: 1153-1156. 10.1093/infdis/166.5.1153.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Glesby MJ, Moore RD, Chaisson RE: Clinical spectrum of herpes zoster in adults infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Clin Infect Dis. 1995, 21 (2): 370-375. 10.1093/clinids/21.2.370.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Veenstra J, Krol A, van Praag RM, Frissen PH, Schellekens PT, Lange JM, Coutinho RA, van der Meer JT: Herpes zoster, immunological deterioration and disease progression in HIV-1 infection. AIDS. 1995, 9: 1153-1158. 10.1097/00002030-199510000-00006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moore RD, Chaisson RE: Natural history of opportunistic disease in an HIV-infected urban clinical cohort. Ann Intern Med. 1996, 124: 633-642. 10.7326/0003-4819-124-7-199604010-00003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McNulty A, Li Y, Radtke U, Kaldor J, Rohrsheim R, Cooper DA, Donovan B: Herpes zoster and the prognosis of HIV-1 infection. Genitourin Med. 1997, 73 (6): 467-470.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Gebo KA, Kalyani R, Moore RD, Polydefkis MJ: The incidence of, risk factors for, and sequelae of herpes zoster among HIV patients in the highly active antiretroviral therapy era. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005, 40: 169-174. 10.1097/01.qai.0000178408.62675.b0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vanhems P, Voisin L, Gayet-Ageron A, Trepo C, Cotte L, Peyramond D, Chidiac C, Touraine JL, Livrozet JM, Fabry J, Voirin N: The incidence of herpes zoster is less likely than other opportunistic infections to be reduced by highly active antiretroviral therapy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2005, 38: 111-3.0. 10.1097/00126334-200501010-00020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hung CC, Hsiao CF, Wang JL, Chen MY, Hsieh SM, Sheng WH, Chang SC: Herpes zoster in HIV-1-infected patients in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy: a prospective observational study. Int J STD AIDS. 2005, 16: 673-676. 10.1258/095646205774357271.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gona P, Van Dyke RB, Williams PL, Dankner WM, Chernoff MC, Nachman SA, Seage GR: Incidence of opportunistic and other infections in HIV-infected children in the HAART era. J Am Med Assoc. 2006, 296: 292-300. 10.1001/jama.296.3.292.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wood SM, Shah SS, Steenhoff AP, Rutstein RM: Primary varicella and Herpes zoster among HIV-infected children from 1989 to 2006. Pediatrics. 2008, 121 (1): e150-e156. 10.1542/peds.2007-0564.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Levin MJ, Anderson JP, Seage GR, Williams PL, PACTG/IMPAACT 219C Team: Short-term and long-term effects of highly active antiretroviral therapy on the incidence of herpes zoster in HIV-infected children. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2009, 50 (2): 182-191. 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31819550a4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Glesby MJ, Hoover DR, Tan T, Shi Q, Gao W, French AL, Maurer T, Young M, Dehovitz J, Ru J, Anastos K: Herpes zoster in women with and at risk for HIV: data from the Women's Interagency HIV Study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004, 37: 1604-1609. 10.1097/00126334-200412150-00013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Song JY, Lee JS, Jung HW, Choi HJ, Lee JS, Eom JS, Cheong HJ, Jung MH, Kim WJ: Herpes zoster among HIV-infected patients in the highly active antiretroviral therapy era: Korean HIV cohort study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010, 53: 417-418. 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181b1d6dc.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Blank LJ, Polydefkis MJ, Moore RD, Gebo KA: Herpes zoster among persons living with HIV in the current antiretroviral therapy era. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012, 61 (2): 203-207. 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318266cd3c.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Jansen K, Michalik C, Hahn M, Dupke S, Esser S, Jaeger H, Köppe S, Moll A, Plettenberg A, Schmidt RE, Skaletz-Rorowski A, Brockmeyer NH: Competence Network for HIV/AIDS: The patient cohort of the German Competence Network for HIV/AIDS (KompNet): A Profile. Eur J Med Res. 2009, 14: 323-331. 10.1186/2047-783X-14-8-323.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Jansen K, Brockmeyer NH, Hahn M, Kaul I, Fenske S, Rausch M, Kuhlmann B, Ulmer A, Lauenroth-Mai E, Harrer T, Hower M, Skaletz-Rorowski A, Michalik C: Competence Network for HIV/AIDS: Epidemiological composition, clinical and treatment characteristics of the patient cohort of the German Competence Network for HIV/AIDS. Eur J Med Res. 2009, 14: 415-425.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kleinbaum DG, Klein M: Survival analysis: A self-learning text. 2005, New York: Springer, 2Google Scholar
- Robert Koch-Institut: Zum Welt AIDS-Tag 2010. Epidemiologisches Bulleti. 2010, 46: 454-459.Google Scholar
- Feller L, Wood NH, Lemmer J: Herpes zoster infection as an immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in HIV-seropositive subjects: a review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007, 104: 455-460. 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.02.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Melbye M, Grossman RJ, Goedert JJ, Eyster ME, Biggar RJ: Risk of AIDS after herpes zoster. Lancet. 1987, 1: 728-731.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Alliegro MB, Dorrucci M, Pezzotti P, Rezza G, Sinicco A, Barbanera M, Castelli F, Tarantini G, Petrucci A: Herpes zoster and progression to AIDS in a cohort of individuals who seroconverted to human immunodeficiency virus. Italian HIV Seroconversion Study. Clin Infect Dis. 1996, 23: 990-995. 10.1093/clinids/23.5.990.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/13/372/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.