- Research article
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
A longitudinal evaluation of Treponema pallidumPCR testing in early syphilis
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-353
© Shields et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
- Received: 14 June 2012
- Accepted: 10 December 2012
- Published: 17 December 2012
Abstract
Background
Syphilis is a growing public health problem among men who have sex with men (MSM) globally. Rapid and accurate detection of syphilis is vital to ensure patients and their contacts receive timely treatment and reduce ongoing transmission.
Methods
We evaluated a PCR assay for the diagnosis of Treponema pallidum using swabs of suspected early syphilis lesions in longitudinally assessed MSM.
Results
We tested 260 MSM for T pallidum by PCR on 288 occasions: 77 (26.7%) had early syphilis that was serologically confirmed at baseline or within six weeks, and 211 (73.3%) remained seronegative for syphilis. Of 55 men with primary syphilis, 49 were PCR positive, giving a sensitivity of 89.1% (95% CI: 77.8%-95.9%) and a specificity of 99.1% (95% CI: 96.5%-99.9%). Of 22 men with secondary syphilis, 11 were PCR positive, giving a sensitivity of 50% (95% CI: 28.2%-71.8%) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI: 66.4%-71.8%). Of the 77 syphilis cases, 43 (56%) were HIV positive and the sensitivity and specificity of the PCR test did not vary by HIV status. The PCR test was able to detect up to five (10%) primary infections that were initially seronegative, including one HIV positive man with delayed seroconversion to syphilis (72 to 140 days) and one HIV positive man who did not seroconvert to syphilis over 14 months follow-up. Both men had been treated for syphilis within a week of the PCR test.
Conclusions
T pallidum PCR is a potentially powerful tool for the early diagnosis of primary syphilis, particularly where a serological response has yet to develop.
Keywords
- Syphilis
- PCR
- Evaluation
Background
Syphilis is a sexually transmissible infection (STI) caused by Treponema pallidum. The infection is systemic, usually involving mucocutaneous ulcers and rashes in the early phases, and a range of serious complications including cardiovascular and neurological disease in later phases [1, 2].
As in many countries, Australian men who have sex with men (MSM) with HIV infection are disproportionately affected by syphilis. Although only ~10% of Australian MSM have HIV infection they contribute around half of all cases of infectious syphilis among MSM [3, 4]. Community-based cohort studies have shown that the incidence of syphilis in MSM with HIV infection is 5–10 times higher than in MSM without HIV [5]. Reasons for this differential are probably behavioural, [6]. but a biological phenomenon linked to HIV’s effect on the immune system has yet to be excluded [7].
Syphilis is at its most infectious in its primary and secondary stages, so early detection has been modelled to have the maximum benefit for preventing its onward transmission [8]. The interpretation of syphilis serology can be problematic in primary syphilis because serological responses might be delayed, often requiring the patient to return for re-testing.
Dark-field microscopy of secretions from chancres can provide a rapid point-of care test result, but the sensitivity is limited and the skill and meticulous care required for specimen collection and microscopy are rarely available. The loss of expertise in dark-field microscopy was lamented over 60 years ago [9].
HIV infection is more likely to be associated with exaggerated and delayed serological responses to syphilis infection [10]. This problem can result in a syphilis diagnosis being missed or the treatment being delayed, with ongoing transmission. A PCR based swab test has the potential to provide earlier diagnosis of primary syphilis in MSM with HIV and also demonstrate re-infection in high titre rapid plasma reagin (RPR) serofast MSM with HIV who have been previously treated for syphilis. Considering the high incidence of early syphilis in HIV-infected MSM, a more sensitive and robust direct test for T pallidum such as PCR is needed.
In this study we evaluated the performance of a probe based PCR assay used to detect T pallidum in suspected lesions of early syphilis, based on a comprehensive clinical and serological assessment.
Methods
Study setting and population
Taylor Square Private Clinic was established in 1981 as Australia’s first private sexual health clinic and has one of the highest case-loads of HIV-infected MSM patients in Australia [11]. All high-risk patients are routinely screened for T pallidum, Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae and HIV according to guidelines [12]. All patients in this study were consecutive high-risk MSM with lesions suggestive of early syphilis between 2004 and 2010, though in the early years of the study the test was in limited supply so it was only used for the highest-risk men. Heterosexual patients were excluded because syphilis is rare in heterosexuals in Australian cities. There was no standardized specimen collection protocol and several different doctors collected specimens.
T pallidumPCR
Specimen collection
A dry swab specimen was obtained from genital, anal or oral ulcers; or from the surface of rashes, papular lesions, or mucosal erosions suggestive of secondary syphilis; then placed in transport medium and sent at room temperature to the Institute of Clinical Pathology and Medical Research (ICPMR) for syphilis PCR testing. Blood for syphilis serology was collected at the same time.
DNA extraction
DNA was extracted from clinical specimens using the NucliSENS easyMAG (BioMeurieux) total nucleic acid extraction system with off board lysis. In brief, swabs were placed in individual lysis tubes, vortexed vigorously and incubated at room temperature for 10 minutes. Lysis solution was then combined with magnetic silica in an extraction cartridge and DNA extracted in the easyMAG using Boom technology. DNA extracts were stored at −80°C prior to PCR testing.
Assay design
The T pallidum PCR targets a 146 base pair region of the gene encoding the 47kDa lipoprotein (Genbank accession number: M88769). The assay uses a 6 carboxyfluorescein (FAM) labelled hydrolysis probe and end point fluorescence detection to identify amplification of products.
The primers [Syph1: 1130AGG GGA AGG TGC TGA CCA TAG1150; & Syph2: 1275GGG AGT GAA ATC CGC AGA GAG1255] and hydrolysis probe [1166(6-FAM) AGC CTA AGC TTG TCA GCG ATC AAG C (BHQ1)1191] were designed using Primer3 and manufactured by Sigma Aldrich.
The PCR was performed in a 50uL reaction containing sample DNA, 3.5mM MgCl2, 200nM each primer, 100nM probe & HotStar Taq Master Mix (Qiagen) [containing 1.5mM MgCl2; 200uM each dNTP & HotStar taq DNA polymerase]. Baseline fluorescence was determined using the FlourTracker (Stratagene) before amplification in a Eppendorf Mastercycler under the following conditions: 95°C × 15 min; 50 cycles of [96°C × 10 sec, 60°C x 1min, 72C × 1min]; 72°C × 5min. Post amplification fluorescence was again measured in the FluorTracker and the ratio of post- to pre-amplification fluorescence calculated.
Samples with fluorescence ratios greater than 3.4 were considered positive and confirmed by gel electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel run for 40 minutes at 200V. Fluorescence ratios less than 1.5 indicated a negative sample, and samples with ratios between 1.5 and 3.4 were deemed equivocal and the assay repeated.
Controls
Individual samples were tested in parallel with inhibition and contamination controls and as both neat and diluted DNA to ensure detection of both weak and strong specimens. Inhibition controls consisted of sample DNA spiked with positive material, while contamination controls utilised no template reagent samples. Each run also contained a serial dilution of positive control to identify the limit of detection of the assay. The positive control was produced by extraction of DNA from a T pallidum (Nichols) suspension which had been previously used in the T pallidum immobilization assay. Initial experiments indicated the assay had a limit of detection of 10–100 organisms and was specific for T pallidum species.
Syphilis serology
Sera were initially screened with fully automated one-step Immulite Treponemal EIA (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics) which uses one major T pallidum recombinant antigen (p17). Specimens positive by EIA were then subjected to confirmatory testing with a RPR test (Reditest, Biokit) and a T pallidum particle agglutination assay (TPPA) (Serodia TPPA, Fujirebio) and fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption (FTA-ABS) test (MarDx®). Men that had previously been treated for syphilis were screened with the RPR test.
Narrow definition of a syphilis case
- 1.
His serology was positive by EIA and TPPA at the time of the PCR swab, after being negative in the previous year, or
- 2.
His RPR titre had risen 4-fold (two titres) or more if he had previously been treated for syphilis.
However, as this definition excludes cases that are in the serological window period, for this study we used a broader case definition:
Broader definition of a syphilis case
- 1.
His serology was positive by both the EIA and TPPA at the time of the PCR swab or within 6 weeks of treatment, after being negative in the previous year, or
- 2.
His RPR titre rose 4-fold (two titres) or more if he had previously been treated for syphilis.
This expanded (longitudinal) definition of early syphilis was developed because many cases were treated presumptively (before serological confirmation) on clinical suspicion or as soon as a positive PCR test result became available. Direct detection tests such as dark-field microscopy [13] and PCR [14] for syphilis have been documented to sometimes precede the serological response, as with all infections.
We conservatively settled on a 6-week cut-off as the minimum period for someone to be (a) treated for syphilis, (b) to have a long-acting injected penicillin or a 2-week course of oral doxycycline ‘wash out’, (c) to become newly-infected with syphilis, and (d) to thereafter mount a serological response. Any seroconversion to syphilis within 6 weeks was, therefore, deemed to result from a T pallidum infection at the time of the initial swab collection and treatment.
Uninfected case definition
- 1.
His T pallidum EIA test remained negative, or
- 2.
His RPR titre did not rise 4-fold (two titres) or more if he had previously been treated for syphilis.
Analysis
Clinical and laboratory data that were extracted from the patient management system included HIV status, syphilis stage, treatment, previous syphilis, syphilis serology and PCR results.
The performance (sensitivity and specificity) of the Treponema pallidum PCR in lesions suggestive of primary syphilis and secondary syphilis was then assessed against the definitions of a syphilis case (above), and by HIV status. For the purpose of comparability with other studies, we also assessed the performance of the PCR test against the narrower definition of syphilis that was limited to base-line clinical signs and serology. We calculated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using the binomial approximation method.
Using a Chi-square test we compared the performance of the PCR test in HIV-positive and HIV-negative men.
All analyses were conducted using Stata statistical software version 9 [15].
Results
Performance of T pallidum PCR by syphilis stage and lesion site
Category | Breakdown | PCR- pos/ serology- pos | Sensitivity (95% CI) | PCR- neg/ serology-neg | Specificity (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lesion stage | Primary lesions(a) | 49/55 | 89.1 (77.8-95.9) | 200/202 | 99.1 (96.5-99.9) |
Secondary lesions(b) | 11/22 | 50.0 (28.2-71.8) | 9/9 | 100.0 (66.4-100) | |
Lesion site | Penile ulcer | 30/33 | 90.9 (75.7-98.1) | 68/70 | 97.1 (90.0-99.7) |
Anal ulcer | 16/16 | 100.0 (79.4-100) | 88/88 | 100.0 (95.9-100*) | |
Oral ulcer | 3/6 | 50.0 (11.8-88.2) | 44/44 | 100.0 (91.9-100) | |
Generalised rash | 6/17 | 35.3 (14.2-61.7) | 9/9 | 100.0 (66.4-100) | |
Perianal condylomata lata/snail track ulcers of the mouth | 5/5 | 100.0 (47.8-100) | - | - |
Performance of PCR against serology – broader definition
Using the broader case definition, 77 (26.7%) of the 288 PCR specimens were collected from men with primary or secondary syphilis at baseline and 211 (73.3%) were collected from men without syphilis.
Of the 55 men with primary syphilis, 49 were PCR positive, yielding a sensitivity of 89.1% (95% CI: 77.8%-95.9%) and a specificity of 99.1% (95% CI: 96.5%-99.9%). Of the 22 men with secondary syphilis, 11 were PCR positive, yielding a sensitivity of 50% (95% CI: 28.2%-71.8%) a specificity of 100% (95% CI: 66.4%-100%) (Table 1). By specimen type, the sensitivity was 90.9% (95% CI: 75.7%-98.1%) in penile chancres, 100% (95%CI: 79.4%-100%) in anal chancres, 50% (95%CI: 11.8%-88.2%) in oral chances, 35% (95%CI:14.2-61.7) in dry rashes of secondary syphilis, and 100% in moist secondary lesions (snail track oral lesions and perianal condylomata lata) (Table 1).
There was no significant difference in sensitivity and specificity of the PCR test, nor site or stage of syphilis, according to HIV status. Of the 77 syphilis cases, 43(56%) were HIV positive, including 53.7% of the primary cases and 62.5% of the secondary cases.
Performance of PCR against serology – narrow case definition
Characteristics of patients that were PCR positive but seronegative for syphilis at baseline
Case number | Clinical status | Baseline test results | Treatment | Intermittent negative EIA results | Follow-up positive serology tests | Syphilis seroconversion classification | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Site of ulcer | Prior syphilis | HIV status (CD4 cells/ul) | Syphilis PCR | HSV PCR | EIA/RPR/TPHA/FTA | Days since baseline | Days since baseline | Days since baseline | EIA/RPR/TPHA/FTA | ||
1 | Anus | No | N | P | N | N | 14 | - | 7 | P/N//P/P | Delayed |
2 | Penis and perianal | Yes | N | P | N | P/N/P/P | 5 | - | 21 | P/1:4/P/P | Delayed |
3 | Penis | No | N | P | N | N | 11 | 7, 14 | 35 | P/N/P/P | Delayed |
4 | Penis | No | P (774) | P | ND | N | 6 | 14,42,72 | 170 | P/N/P/P | Delayed or re-infection |
5 | Anus | No | P (646) | P | N | N | 7 | 426 | - | - | Persistent negative at 14 months |
Discrepant results– PCR positive and serology negative
In five high-risk MSM the T. pallidum PCR test was positive and the syphilis serology was negative at baseline. The characteristics of these cases, including follow-up serology, are detailed in Table 2. Cases 1, 2, and 3 all seroconverted to syphilis within 35 days. Case 4 seroconverted between 72 and 170 days and was at ongoing risk, so it was not possible to determine whether he was a late seroconverter or was re-infected with syphilis. Case 5 remained seronegative after 14 months and received antibiotic treatment 7 days after sample collection. Both cases 4 and 5 were HIV positive with high CD4 counts. Notably, three men who seroconverted later, had not previously been treated for syphilis and remained seronegative in the RPR test.
Discussion
We found the T pallidum PCR test to be both sensitive and specific in primary syphilis, thus facilitating rapid diagnosis and treatment. This evaluation has demonstrated that the sensitivity of T. pallidum was 89.1% for primary syphilis and 50.0% for secondary syphilis, including three infections in men that seroconverted to syphilis within five weeks. There was no difference in the sensitivity and specificity of the PCR test according to HIV status. The performance of T pallidum PCR testing in our evaluation was broadly comparable to previous studies using other PCR tests [14, 16–19].
Previous evaluations have generally relied on baseline serology alone [16–18]. Clinicians are aware that the diagnosis of syphilis is not so straightforward and recognise that the diagnosis and staging of syphilis relies on a combination of knowledge of the individual’s past syphilis history and sexual behaviour, clinical appearance, and serological profile (including RPR titre and serological evolution), as well as direct detection techniques.
Like Heymans et al., [17] and Gayet-Ageron et al [16] we do not see much value in T pallidum PCR testing in suspected secondary syphilis. The sensitivity of PCR was modest (Table 3) and the sensitivity of both RPR and specific serological tests is virtually 100% in secondary syphilis [10]. That said, the sensitivity of the PCR test might be increased by improved specimen collection. There was a time when well-selected secondary lesions were lightly abraded with the edge of a large-bore needle or a scalpel to extract serum for dark-field microscopy [9] and this might also improve the sensitivity of PCR. This re-visited method of specimen-collection would be worth examining in future evaluations of T pallidum PCR tests. Notably, a study that assessed the performance of PCR using skin biopsy specimens to diagnose secondary syphilis found a higher sensitivity of 75% [19].
The lack of a standardised specimen collection protocol is a limitation of this study that may have reduced the apparent sensitivity of the PCR test. Another limitation of our study was that patient selection was not according to a formal protocol. Since the PCR test was in limited supply the test was used selectively and therefore we assume that the tested population was biased toward the higher risk MSM within the clinic. This bias might inflate the apparent specificity of the PCR test.
The PCR test seems likely to be most valuable in primary syphilis, where serology is more problematic than in secondary syphilis. Since HIV infection is more likely to be associated with exaggerated or delayed serological responses to syphilis, a PCR test has the potential to provide earlier diagnosis of primary syphilis in MSM with HIV and also demonstrate re-infection in high titre RPR serofast MSM with HIV who have been previously treated for syphilis. There were five (10% of the primary) cases in our evaluation where the PCR was positive and the serology was negative at baseline. In three cases the serology became positive between 7 and 35 days later. Palmer et al. also found two patients who were positive by PCR 12 and 21 days before seroconverting to syphilis, both were HIV positive [14]. A further two of our patients, who were HIV positive were not confirmed as becoming seropositive as a result of the current episode, though one was positive when next tested 7 months later. Palmer et al., also found a positive PCR result in a patient with HIV infection with consistently negative syphilis serology. This patient received a 10 day course of antibiotics one week after sampling. They hypothesized the prompt antibiotic treatment coupled with the patient’s immune dysfunction may have blunted a serological response to T pallidum[14].
Conclusion
In conclusion, our evaluation demonstrated that T pallidum PCR could allow earlier diagnosis of primary syphilis, with potential clinical and public health benefits.
Declarations
Authors’ Affiliations
References
- Zetola NM, Engelman J, Jensen TP, Klausner JD: Syphilis in the United States: an update for clinicians with an emphasis on HIV coinfection. Mayo Clin Proc. 2007, 82: 1091-1102. 10.4065/82.9.1091.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Donovan B, Dayan L: Syphilis. Oxford Textbook of Medicine. Edited by: Warrell DA, Cox TM, Firth JD. 2010, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 885-896.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Guy R, Leslie D, Simpson K, Hatch B, Leydon J, Hellard M, Kelly H: Sustained increase in infectious syphilis notifications in Victoria. Med J Aust. 2005, 183: 218-219.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jin F, Prestage GP, Kippax SC, Pell CM, Donovan BJ, Kaldor JM, Grulich AE: Epidemic syphilis among homosexually active men in Sydney. Med J Aust. 2005, 183: 179-183.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jin F, Prestage GP, Zablotska I, Rawstorne P, Kippax SC, Donovan B, Cunningham PH, Templeton DJ, Kaldor JM, Grulich AE: High rates of sexually transmitted infections in HIV positive homosexual men: data from two community based cohorts. Sex Transm Infect. 2007, 83: 397-399. 10.1136/sti.2007.025684.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Mao L, Crawford JM, Hospers HJ, Prestage GP, Grulich AE, Kaldor JM, Kippax SC: ‘Serosorting’ in casual anal sex of HIV-negative gay men is noteworthy and is increasing in Sydney, Australia. AIDS. 2006, 20: 1204-1206. 10.1097/01.aids.0000226964.17966.75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fleming DT, Wasserheit JN: From epidemiological synergy to public health policy and practice: the contribution of other sexually transmitted diseases to sexual transmission of HIV infection. Sex Transm Infect. 1999, 75: 3-17. 10.1136/sti.75.1.3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Gray RT, Hoare A, Prestage GP, Donovan B, Kaldor JM, Wilson DP: Frequent testing of highly sexually active gay men is required to control syphilis. Sex Transm Dis. 2010, 37: 298-305.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stokes JH, Beerman H, NR I: Modern Clinical Syphilology. 1944, Philadelphia: WB SaundersGoogle Scholar
- Larsen SA, Steiner BM, Rudolph AH: Laboratory diagnosis and interpretation of tests for syphilis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1995, 8: 1-21.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Donovan B, Finlayson RJ, Mutimer K, Price R, Robertson M, Nelson M, Slade M, Reece I, Dalle Nogare J: HIV infection in sexually transmissible disease practice in Sydney: the effects of legislation, public education and changing clinical spectrum. Int J STD AIDS. 1990, 1: 21-27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bourne C, Edwards B, Shaw M, Gowers A, Rodgers C, Ferson M: Sexually transmissible infection testing guidelines for men who have sex with men. Sex Health. 2008, 5: 189-191. 10.1071/SH07092.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Creighton ET: Darkfield microscopy for the detection and identification of Treponema pallidum. A manual of tests for syphilis. Edited by: Larsen SA, Hunter EF, Kraus SJ. 1990, Washington, D.C: American Public Health Association, 49-62. 8Google Scholar
- Palmer HM, Higgins SP, Herring AJ, Kingston MA: Use of PCR in the diagnosis of early syphilis in the United Kingdom. Sex Transm Infect. 2003, 79: 479-483. 10.1136/sti.79.6.479.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- StataCorp: Intercooled Stata. 2004, College Station: Stata Corp, 90Google Scholar
- Gayet-Ageron A, Ninet B, Toutous-Trellu L, Lautenschlager S, Furrer H, Piguet V, Schrenzel J, Hirschel B: Assessment of a real-time PCR test to diagnose syphilis from diverse biological samples. Sex Transm Infect. 2009, 85: 264-269. 10.1136/sti.2008.034314.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Heymans R, van der Helm JJ, de Vries HJC, Fennema HSA, Coutinho RA, Bruisten SM: Clinical value of Treponema pallidum real-time PCR for diagnosis of syphilis. J Clin Microbiol. 2010, 48: 497-502. 10.1128/JCM.00720-09.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leslie DE, Azzato F, Karapanagiotidis T, Leydon J, Fyfe J: Development of a real-time PCR assay to detect Treponema pallidum in clinical specimens and assessment of the assay’s performance by comparison with serological testing. J Clin Microbiol. 2007, 45: 93-96. 10.1128/JCM.01578-06.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Buffet M, Grange PA, Gerhardt P, Carlotti A, Calvez V, Bianchi A, Dupin N: Diagnosing Treponema pallidum in secondary syphilis by PCR and immunohistochemistry. J Invest Dermatol. 2007, 127: 2345-2350. 10.1038/sj.jid.5700888.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/12/353/prepub
Pre-publication history
Copyright
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
