- Research article
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Imbalances in serum angiopoietin concentrations are early predictors of septic shock development in patients with post chemotherapy febrile neutropenia
© Alves et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
- Received: 29 January 2010
- Accepted: 28 May 2010
- Published: 28 May 2010
Febrile neutropenia carries a high risk of sepsis complications, and the identification of biomarkers capable to identify high risk patients is a great challenge. Angiopoietins (Ang -) are cytokines involved in the control microvascular permeability. It is accepted that Ang-1 expression maintains endothelial barrier integrity, and that Ang-2 acts as an antagonizing cytokine with barrier-disrupting functions in inflammatory situations. Ang-2 levels have been recently correlated with sepsis mortality in intensive care units.
We prospectively evaluated concentrations of Ang-1 and Ang-2 at different time-points during febrile neutropenia, and explored the diagnostic accuracy of these mediators as potential predictors of poor outcome in this clinical setting before the development of sepsis complications.
Patients that evolved with septic shock (n = 10) presented higher levels of Ang-2 measured 48 hours after fever onset, and of the Ang-2/Ang-1 ratio at the time of fever onset compared to patients with non-complicated sepsis (n = 31). These levels correlated with sepsis severity scores.
Our data suggest that imbalances in the concentrations of Ang-1 and Ang-2 are independent and early markers of the risk of developing septic shock and of sepsis mortality in febrile neutropenia, and larger studies are warranted to validate their clinical usefulness. Therapeutic strategies that manipulate this Ang-2/Ang-1 imbalance can potentially offer new and promising treatments for sepsis in febrile neutropenia.
- Septic Shock
- Febrile Neutropenia
- Sequential Organ Failure Assessment
- Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score
- Neutropenic Fever
Despite improvements in supportive care, sepsis remains the most common cause of death in intensive care units, with mortality rates of 30% to 50 [1, 2]. Recently, therapies targeting elements from the inflammatory and coagulation cascades yielded disappointing results in clinical trials [3–5], possibly due to redundancy within the inflammatory pathways activated during sepsis. Endothelial barrier disruption plays a key role in the pathogenesis of sepsis and septic shock, making it an attractive target for studies aimed to identify new therapeutic targets for sepsis . Recently, the participation of VEGF, a vascular growth factor with potent microvascular permeability functions, in the pathogenesis of septic shock was demonstrated . Another important regulator of endothelial barrier function are the angiopoietins (Ang) -1 and -2, and the tyrosine kinase receptor Tie2 expressed in endothelial cells. Binding of Ang-1 to Tie2 maintains the quiescent resting state of the endothelium and reduces vascular permeability in response to inflammatory stimuli. In contrast, Ang-2 inhibits biding of Ang-1 to Tie2, resulting in vessel destabilization [8–10]. Circulating levels of Ang-1 and Ang-2 have been recently evaluated in patients with sepsis, and levels of Ang-2 have been correlated with sepsis severity in children  and adults [12–15], when evaluated in patients admitted to intensive care units with established signs and symptoms of sepsis.
Febrile neutropenia (FN) in patients with hematologic malignancies is characterized by increased susceptibility to sepsis complications, and a higher risk of septic shock, with mortality ranging from 2-21% . Most patients with FN are well at the time of fever onset. However, ways to predict the development of fulminant sepsis and septic shock is a great challenge in the care of these patients [17, 18]. Here we evaluated the time-course of Ang-1 and Ang-2 expression in FN patients early in the course of sepsis and explored the diagnostic accuracy of Ang-1 and Ang-2 levels as potential predictors of poor outcome in this clinical setting.
Patient's eligibility criteria
Recruitment of patients took place at the Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit of University of Campinas between March 2008 and March 2009. Patients were included if they fulfilled the following criteria: (1) diagnosis of hematological malignancies, and (2) admission as inpatients for intensive chemotherapy (induction for acute leukemia or high-dose sequential therapy for lymphomas) or hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). Patients were invited to participate before the initiation of any chemotherapy regimen. Fever (T ≥ 38.0°C) at admission was the only exclusion criteria. The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the local Ethics Committee. Informed written consent was obtained from all patients prior to collection of samples. Only patients that presented fever during neutropenia (defined as a neutrophil count <500 μl) were included in the second phase of the study. Descriptive data consisting of demographics, diagnosis, clinical data, and disease severity scores were obtained from the medical records. Twenty healthy individuals volunteered to determine a normal reference range for Ang-1 and Ang-2 levels (10 males, 10 females; median age 40 - range 24 to 53).
Sepsis definitions and risk stratification scores
An infectious etiology was assumed for all patients with post chemotherapy neutropenia with new onset fever, in accordance with FN management protocols. Blood and urine cultures were immediately obtained and broad-spectrum antibiotics were initiated . Sepsis, in this population, was defined by the presence of two or more of the following: (1) temperature > 38.0°C, (2) heart rate>90 beats/min, (3) respiratory rate > 20 breaths/min or PaCO2 < 32 mmHg, and a microbiologically proven or clinically evident source of infection. Septic shock was present in patients in which sepsis was complicated with hypoperfusion or hypotension (systolic arterial pressure <90 mmHg or a reduction in systolic blood pressure of >40 mmHg from baseline), despite adequate volume resuscitation. Patients were subdivided into two outcome groups: sepsis (non-complicated) and septic shock. Severity of illness was assessed by calculating the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score  daily after the development of fever, and by calculation of the Multinational Association for Supportive Care In Cancer (MASCC) score at the time of fever [21, 22].
Venous blood was drawn at enrollment (baseline), within 12 hours after first episode of neutropenic fever, and 48 hours thereafter. Samples were immediately centrifuged at 3000 rpm (4°C, 20 mins) and plasma and serum was stored at -80°C until analysis. Samples were processed by the same investigator. Serum levels of Ang-1 and Ang-2 were measured in duplicate using a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (Quantikine, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Interassay coefficient of variations were 2.95% for Ang-1 and 6.87% for Ang-2 samples with concentrations within the range observed in our study. Von Willebrand Factor (VWF) levels were measured in duplicate in citrate plasma samples using a rabbit anti-human VWF peroxidase conjugate (Dako Netherlands BV, Heverlee, Belgium).
Patients were divided in two outcome subgroups according to the presence of absence of septic shock at any time point before the resolution of FN. Differences in continuous variables between patients from each subgroup, and between patients and healthy controls were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney rank sum test. Categorical variables were compared using the Fisher's exact test. Data are expressed as median and range unless otherwise stated. Correlation (Spearman's rank correlation) and linear regression analysis were performed between sepsis severity scores and angiopoietin concentrations. Receiver operator characteristics (ROC) procedures were used to identify optimal cut-off values of angiopoietin concentrations to differentiate patients with non-complicated sepsis and patients with septic shock. A second analysis was performed to explore the effect of angiopoietin concentrations on 30-day mortality, calculated from the day of fever onset. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Parameters independently associated with survival were identified by univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. Variables found to be statistically significant at a 10% level in the univariate analyses were included in the multivariate model. Different models were established, and variable selection was performed by different forward and backward procedures, with comparable results. A p value less than or equal to 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analysis were performed with the SPSS package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and the GraphPad Prism Software (GraphPad Prism Software Inc. San Diego, California, USA).
(n = 31)
(n = 10)
Age (median, range)
P < 0.01 *
Intensive CTx/autologous HSCT
Neutrophils/μl - Fever (median, range)
60 (0 - 290)
50 (20 - 470)
Days of neutropenia (median, range)
12 (4 - 22)
14 (7 - 30)
Platelets × 10 3 /μl - fever (median, range)
25 (6 - 169)
38 (12 - 90)
Days with fever (median, range)
4 (1 - 12)
5 (1 - 12)
SOFA score - fever onset (median, range)
3 (0 - 7)
4 (2 - 8 )
SOFA score - 48 hours (median, range)
4 (2 - 7)
7 (4 - 16)
P = 0.01 *
MASCC score (median, range)
21 (16 - 23)
18 (11 - 24)
P = 0.03 *
Agent isolation in bloodstream (yes:no) £
P < 0.001 **
Von Willebrand Factor U/ml - fever (median, range)
Baseline levels of Ang-1 and Ang-2 in the study population
Healthy individuals (N = 20)
Patients (N = 41)
Sepsis € (n = 31)
Septic shock (n = 10)
Time-course of Ang-1 serum levels in hematological patients with FN
Time-course of Ang-2 serum levels in hematological patients with FN
At baseline, no statistically significant difference could be observed in levels of Ang-2 between patients from the two groups (Table 2). Furthermore, Ang-2 levels were similar at the time of neutropenic fever between patients with non-complicated sepsis (105.55 pg/ml, range 19.40-1653.50 pg/ml) and septic shock (152.39 pg/ml, range 19.97-644.27 pg/ml). However, 48 hours after neutropenic fever a striking difference could be observed between patients with and without septic shock, with markedly increased Ang-2 concentrations in patients with septic shock (840.77 pg/ml, range 30.67-2085.30 pg/ml) compared to patients with non-complicated sepsis (91.10 pg/ml, range 19,40-785,24 pg/ml; Mann-Whitney test: p = 0.002) (Figure 2). We estimated the diagnostic accuracy of Ang-2 levels measured 48 hours after fever onset. Ang-2 48 hours after fever onset yielded an area under the ROC curve of 0.84 (95%CI = 0.65-1.0; P = 0.004). In our population, an optimal cut-off value of Ang-2>233 pg/ml predicted the development of septic shock with a sensitivity of 75% (95%CI = 34.9%-96.8%) and a specificity of 92.6%(95%CI = 75.7%-99.1%).
The Ang-2/Ang-1 ratio is increased in FN patients that evolve to septic shock
The Ang-2/Ang-1 ratio was calculated in an effort to detect relevant changes in the relative concentration of these two antagonistic mediators of microvascular permeability. At the time of neutropenic fever, the Ang-2/Ang-1 ratio was much higher in patients with septic shock (6.80, range 0.03-17.20) compared to patients with non-complicated sepsis (0.80, range 0.01-16.8; Mann-Whitney test: p = 0.05). After 48 hours, the Ang-2/Ang-1 ratio was higher in patients that developed septic shock (10.58, range 0.10-101.70) compared to patients with non-complicated sepsis (0.40, range 0.01-18.70), but statistical significance was not reached (Mann-Whitney test: P = 0.06) (Figure 2). Estimation of the diagnostic accuracy of the Ang-2/Ang-1 ratio at fever onset yielded an area under the ROC curve of 0.71 (95%CI = 0.50-0.93; P = 0.05). In our population, a median Ang-2/Ang-1 ratio of 1.17, which was the optimal cut-off value identified by the ROC procedure, predicted the development of septic shock with a sensitivity of 77.8% (95%CI = 40.0%-97.2%) and a specificity of 60% (95% CI = 40.6%-77.3%).
Serum Ang-1 and Ang-2 levels correlate with severity of illness score (SOFA)
Ang-2/Ang-1 ratio at fever onset and 30-day mortality in patients with FN
Post chemotherapy FN in patients with hematological malignancies is a condition that carries a high risk of sepsis complications with mortality rates as high as 21% , usually preceded by septic shock. Patients with FN are a heterogeneous group in terms of risks of complications and mortality, and the identification of parameters capable to accurately identify high risk patients is one of the great challenges in their care. Clinical scores such as the MASCC , and laboratory parameters such as C-reactive protein, IL-6, IL-8 and procalcitonin have been recently proved to be useful tools for this purpose . However, it is generally acknowledged that these parameters are more useful to identify patients at low risk for complications, leaving room for refinements in the risk stratification of FN patients. Ideally, one such marker should be easily detected in samples obtained before the development of severe sepsis, and should not be influenced by cytopenias or by the inflammatory milieu associated with disease status. Elements that are directly involved in the pathogenesis of sepsis complications are thus more attractive candidates than non-specific elements of the inflammatory cascade.
Angiopoietins are a family of vascular growth factors with critical roles in embryonic and postnatal angiogenesis. Ang-1 and Ang-2 both act on the Tie2 tyrosine kinase receptor found primarily on endothelial cells, but appear to play antagonist roles . Apparently, Ang-1 promotes vessel stabilization whereas Ang-2 is involved in the destabilization of newly formed vessels. These processes of disassemble and reassemble of the endothelial lining of primitive blood vessels is important because it allows the incorporation of new endothelial cells to growing endothelial tubes, leading eventually to the formation of functional and mature blood vessels . A role of angiopoietins in the pathogenesis of septic shock is supported by multiple lines of evidence. First, increased levels of Ang-2 levels have been demonstrated in adult and pediatric patients with sepsis in intensive care units (ICU) and these levels correlated with sepsis severity [11, 12, 14, 25]. Second, serum from patients with sepsis has been shown to disrupt endothelial architecture, an effect that correlates with Ang-2 levels, is reversed by Ang-1 and is mimicked by recombinant Ang-2 . Finally, Ang-2 levels have been shown to correlate with pulmonary permeability edema and occurrence of acute respiratory distress syndrome in mechanically ventilated patients . More recently, Kumpers et al, studying a population of 43 medical ICU patients demonstrated that Ang-2 levels at the time of ICU admission was a strong predictor of mortality . Ang-1 levels were also evaluated in some of these studies, but so far studies have failed to a relationship between Ang-1 and sepsis outcomes.
In our prospective study we explored the time-course of Ang-1 and Ang-2 in a population of patients with high risk of sepsis complications before the development of severe sepsis. As far as we are aware, the significance of Ang-1 and Ang-2 levels has not been studied in patients with FN. An additional contribution of our study is that we prospectively evaluated the significance of Ang-1 and Ang-2 levels at an earlier time-point in the development of sepsis (which developed in a median time of 4.1 days after fever onset), as opposed to studies that evaluated patients at the ICU. This difference is evidenced by the median SOFA score of our patients (4 range 1-8) compared to higher median SOFA scores (16 range 1-22) from other key studies . Last, Ang-1 and Ang-2 levels were serially evaluated at three time points, thus offering a view of the time-course of Ang-1 and Ang-2 release in the early hours of sepsis.
For this study we only included patients with hematological malignancies and FN after intensive chemotherapy that were treated as inpatients from day one of chemotherapy until the resolution of neutropenia. By doing so, we intended to obtain a representative sample of patients with high risk of sepsis complications. Furthermore, the fact that all patients were treated as inpatients allowed us to standardize important variables that could affect the validity of our results such as the time between fever onset and sample collection. So as to limit as much as possible the influence of different diagnosis and chemotherapy regimens on our results, Ang-1 and Ang-2 levels were also collected immediately before the initiation of chemotherapy, allowing differences between outcome groups to be compared not only as absolute values, but also as fold-increase from baseline levels, which did not alter our results (data not shown). In fact, neither Ang-1 nor Ang-2 levels were significantly different before the initiation of chemotherapy between patients with non-complicated sepsis and septic shock, supporting the uniformity of our group of patients as far as the two study variables were concerned.
The main finding of our study is that the relative concentration of Ang-1 and Ang-2 are different in subgroups of patients with FN that evolve to non-complicated sepsis compared to patients that develop septic shock, and that evaluation of these two proteins within the first 48 hours after neutropenic fever, before the development of any signs and symptoms of septic shock, is a promising tool to discriminate high risk patients with FN. In accordance with previous studies, Ang-2 levels were significantly higher in patients with septic shock compared to patients with non-complicated sepsis. This difference was not present at the time of fever onset, rose sharply and became evident after 48 hours, when levels in the poorer outcome group were 8 times higher than in the good outcome group. Importantly, Ang-2 baseline levels were similar. As in previous studies, we were not able to detect any significant difference of Ang-1 levels between study groups. However, when the relative concentrations of these two antagonistic cytokines were evaluated, we did observe a relative deficiency of Ang-1 compared to Ang-2 levels in patients that developed septic shock, that was evident early at the time of fever onset. It has been known for more than a decade that Ang-1 can protect adult vasculature against VEGF-induced plasma leakage . Ang-1 has also been shown to protect mice from endotoxic shock . In this respect, it is tempting to speculate that the imbalance between Ang-1 and Ang-2 levels present already at the time of fever onset is associated with a poorer outcome of sepsis in FN, and possibly in other patients with sepsis. This hypothesis is well illustrated in our work by the divergent trend of Ang-2/Ang-1 ratio observed in each outcome subgroup of patients. Early in the course of sepsis, patients that evolved to septic shock presented a 7-fold increase in the Ang-2/Ang-1 ratio, whereas patients with non-complicated sepsis presented a 0.8 decrease when compared to baseline (pre-chemotherapy) ratios. After 48 hours, this divergent trend persisted, with patients that evolved to septic shock presenting a 10-fold increase, and patients with non-complicated sepsis with a 0.4-fold decrease. We also evaluated VWF antigen levels, which is increased in patients with sepsis , and is an indicator of endothelial dysfunction and stimulation . In contrast to Ang-2, no difference could be observed between both patient groups at any time-point (table 1). We also demonstrated a significant, though weak correlation of Ang-2 concentrations 48 hours after fever onset and of Ang-2/Ang-1 ratio (both at fever onset and after 48 hours) with the SOFA score of sepsis severity. Based on these results, we estimated diagnostic accuracy of Ang-2 concentrations 48 hours after fever and of Ang-2/Ang-1 ratio at fever onset. Despite wide confidence intervals, area under the ROC curves suggest that both biomarkers should be further investigated as promising tools to discriminate high-risk FN patients in studies with larger sample sizes. The relationship between angiopoietin concentrations and 30-day mortality was also evaluated. Using a multivariate Cox model, we demonstrate that the Ang-2/Ang-1 ratio at the time of fever onset can be an independent predictor of sepsis survival in our population, an observation that will have to be validated in larger studies.
Recently, the time course of Ang-1 and Ang-2 release was evaluated in a model of human endotoxemia , which showed that Ang-2 release is initiated 2.5 hours after LPS challenge, and observed no significant variations in levels of Ang-1. Ang-2 is a Weibel-Palade body-stored molecule that is rapidly released upon endothelial stimulation. In contrast, Ang-1 is believed to exert its vessel-sealing effect by low-level constitutive activation of the Tie2 receptor, in a model in which constitutive Ang-1/Tie2 interactions control endothelial barrier integrity as a default pathway, and Ang-2 acts as a dynamically regulated antagonizing cytokine . Our results showing that patients that evolve to septic shock present an initial relative deficiency of Ang-1 associated with a sharp increase in Ang-2 levels in the first 48 hours of sepsis supports that similar events can be involved in the pathogenesis of septic shock in FN.
There are certain limitations of our study that need to be acknowledged to avoid overinterpretation of its conclusions. Research about new diagnostic tools follow a sequence of phases along which the questions answered by each phase progress from the demonstration that a biomarker behaves differently in diseased and normal individuals (phase I) to the ultimate demonstration of improved clinical outcomes after its incorporation (phase IV) . Ours is a phase II study in which the performance of a new diagnostic assay was tested in patients with a defined condition (febrile neutropenia) and potential different outcomes, but in which several confounding variables were controlled. Phase II studies tell us whether the test shows diagnostic promise under ideal conditions. Therefore, our study design does not allow us to universalize our conclusions to clinical settings where the impact of treatment related and other variables might reject our conclusions. For the formal validation of the assay and its incorporation intro clinical practice, a larger sample size (ideally from distinct centers) under less controlled conditions should be used. The relatively low number of deaths used for the multivariate analysis also deserves to be discussed. Our study design required a very specific population of patients, with stringent inclusion criteria to control confounding variables, so that a further increase in sample size was not feasible. On the other hand, it has been demonstrated that relaxing the rule of 10 events per variable in Cox models is possible without unacceptable increases in confounding bias . With this in mind, we believe that as long as the above-mentioned limits of our study are acknowledged, the association of 30-day mortality with Ang-2/Ang-1 ratio is an important information to the literature.
In summary, our data suggest that imbalances in the concentrations of Ang-1 and Ang-2 present already at the time of the first fever peak is an independent marker of the risk of developing septic shock and of 30-day mortality in FN. Further studies are warranted to validate this new biomarker as clinically relevant tool in the daily care of these patients. In addition, therapeutic strategies designed to manipulate the Ang-2/Ang-1 imbalance can offer a new and promising paradigm for the treatment of sepsis and septic shock in patients with FN.
This study was financially supported by Fapesp and CNPq, Brazil. The Hematology and Hemotherapy Center - Hemocentro UNICAMP, forms part of the National Institute of Science and Technology of Blood, Brazil (INCT do Sangue CNPq/MCT/FAPESP).
- Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, Dellinger RP, Fein AM, Knaus WA, Schein RM, Sibbald WJ: Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chest. 1992, 101 (6): 1644-1655. 10.1378/chest.101.6.1644.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, Moss M: The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med. 2003, 348 (16): 1546-1554. 10.1056/NEJMoa022139.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- De Backer D, Donadello K, Favory R: Link between coagulation abnormalities and microcirculatory dysfunction in critically ill patients. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009, 22 (2): 150-154. 10.1097/ACO.0b013e328328d1a1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hotchkiss RS, Karl IE: The pathophysiology and treatment of sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2003, 348 (2): 138-150. 10.1056/NEJMra021333.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Warren HS, Suffredini AF, Eichacker PQ, Munford RS: Risks and benefits of activated protein C treatment for severe sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2002, 347 (13): 1027-1030. 10.1056/NEJMsb020574.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spronk PE, Zandstra DF, Ince C: Bench-to-bedside review: sepsis is a disease of the microcirculation. Crit Care. 2004, 8 (6): 462-468. 10.1186/cc2894.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Yano K, Liaw PC, Mullington JM, Shih SC, Okada H, Bodyak N, Kang PM, Toltl L, Belikoff B, Buras J, et al: Vascular endothelial growth factor is an important determinant of sepsis morbidity and mortality. J Exp Med. 2006, 203 (6): 1447-1458. 10.1084/jem.20060375.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Fiedler U, Reiss Y, Scharpfenecker M, Grunow V, Koidl S, Thurston G, Gale NW, Witzenrath M, Rosseau S, Suttorp N, et al: Angiopoietin-2 sensitizes endothelial cells to TNF-alpha and has a crucial role in the induction of inflammation. Nat Med. 2006, 12 (2): 235-239. 10.1038/nm1351.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maisonpierre PC, Suri C, Jones PF, Bartunkova S, Wiegand SJ, Radziejewski C, Compton D, McClain J, Aldrich TH, Papadopoulos N, et al: Angiopoietin-2, a natural antagonist for Tie2 that disrupts in vivo angiogenesis. Science. 1997, 277 (5322): 55-60. 10.1126/science.277.5322.55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thurston G, Rudge JS, Ioffe E, Zhou H, Ross L, Croll SD, Glazer N, Holash J, McDonald DM, Yancopoulos GD: Angiopoietin-1 protects the adult vasculature against plasma leakage. Nat Med. 2000, 6 (4): 460-463. 10.1038/74725.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Giuliano JS, Lahni PM, Harmon K, Wong HR, Doughty LA, Carcillo JA, Zingarelli B, Sukhatme VP, Parikh SM, Wheeler DS: Admission angiopoietin levels in children with septic shock. Shock. 2007, 28 (6): 650-654.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kumpers P, Lukasz A, David S, Horn R, Hafer C, Faulhaber-Walter R, Fliser D, Haller H, Kielstein JT: Excess circulating angiopoietin-2 is a strong predictor of mortality in critically ill medical patients. Crit Care. 2008, 12 (6): R147-10.1186/cc7130.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kumpers P, van Meurs M, David S, Molema G, Bijzet J, Lukasz A, Biertz F, Haller H, Zijlstra JG: Time course of angiopoietin-2 release during experimental human endotoxemia and sepsis. Crit Care. 2009, 13 (3): R64-10.1186/cc7866.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Parikh SM, Mammoto T, Schultz A, Yuan HT, Christiani D, Karumanchi SA, Sukhatme VP: Excess circulating angiopoietin-2 may contribute to pulmonary vascular leak in sepsis in humans. PLoS Med. 2006, 3 (3): e46-10.1371/journal.pmed.0030046.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Siner JM, Bhandari V, Engle KM, Elias JA, Siegel MD: Elevated serum angiopoietin 2 levels are associated with increased mortality in sepsis. Shock. 2009, 31 (4): 348-353. 10.1097/SHK.0b013e318188bd06.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Herbst C, Naumann F, Kruse EB, Monsef I, Bohlius J, Schulz H, Engert A: Prophylactic antibiotics or G-CSF for the prevention of infections and improvement of survival in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009, CD007107-1Google Scholar
- Cherif H, Johansson E, Bjorkholm M, Kalin M: The feasibility of early hospital discharge with oral antimicrobial therapy in low risk patients with febrile neutropenia following chemotherapy for hematologic malignancies. Haematologica. 2006, 91 (2): 215-222.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Malik I, Hussain M, Yousuf H: Clinical characteristics and therapeutic outcome of patients with febrile neutropenia who present in shock: need for better strategies. J Infect. 2001, 42 (2): 120-125. 10.1053/jinf.2001.0798.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hughes WT, Armstrong D, Bodey GP, Bow EJ, Brown AE, Calandra T, Feld R, Pizzo PA, Rolston KV, Shenep JL, et al: 2002 guidelines for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer. Clin Infect Dis. 2002, 34 (6): 730-751. 10.1086/339215.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonca A, Bruining H, Reinhart CK, Suter PM, Thijs LG: The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 1996, 22 (7): 707-710. 10.1007/BF01709751.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Klastersky J, Paesmans M, Rubenstein EB, Boyer M, Elting L, Feld R, Gallagher J, Herrstedt J, Rapoport B, Rolston K, et al: The Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer risk index: A multinational scoring system for identifying low-risk febrile neutropenic cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2000, 18 (16): 3038-3051.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Uys A, Rapoport BL, Anderson R: Febrile neutropenia: a prospective study to validate the Multinational Association of Supportive Care of Cancer (MASCC) risk-index score. Support Care Cancer. 2004, 12 (8): 555-560. 10.1007/s00520-004-0614-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ellis M: Febrile neutropenia. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008, 1138: 329-350. 10.1196/annals.1414.035.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Conway EM, Collen D, Carmeliet P: Molecular mechanisms of blood vessel growth. Cardiovasc Res. 2001, 49 (3): 507-521. 10.1016/S0008-6363(00)00281-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Orfanos SE, Kotanidou A, Glynos C, Athanasiou C, Tsigkos S, Dimopoulou I, Sotiropoulou C, Zakynthinos S, Armaganidis A, Papapetropoulos A, et al: Angiopoietin-2 is increased in severe sepsis: correlation with inflammatory mediators. Crit Care Med. 2007, 35 (1): 199-206. 10.1097/01.CCM.0000251640.77679.D7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Heijden van der M, van Nieuw Amerongen GP, Koolwijk P, van Hinsbergh VW, Groeneveld AB: Angiopoietin-2, permeability oedema, occurrence and severity of ALI/ARDS in septic and non-septic critically ill patients. Thorax. 2008, 63 (10): 903-909. 10.1136/thx.2007.087387.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Witzenbichler B, Westermann D, Knueppel S, Schultheiss HP, Tschope C: Protective role of angiopoietin-1 in endotoxic shock. Circulation. 2005, 111 (1): 97-105. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000151287.08202.8E.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kremer Hovinga JA, Zeerleder S, Kessler P, Romani de Wit T, van Mourik JA, Hack CE, ten Cate H, Reitsma PH, Wuillemin WA, Lammle B: ADAMTS-13, von Willebrand factor and related parameters in severe sepsis and septic shock. J Thromb Haemost. 2007, 5 (11): 2284-2290. 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02743.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reinhart K, Bayer O, Brunkhorst F, Meisner M: Markers of endothelial damage in organ dysfunction and sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2002, 30 (5 Suppl): S302-312. 10.1097/00003246-200205001-00021.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fiedler U, Scharpfenecker M, Koidl S, Hegen A, Grunow V, Schmidt JM, Kriz W, Thurston G, Augustin HG: The Tie-2 ligand angiopoietin-2 is stored in and rapidly released upon stimulation from endothelial cell Weibel-Palade bodies. Blood. 2004, 103 (11): 4150-4156. 10.1182/blood-2003-10-3685.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sackett DL, Haynes RB: The architecture of diagnostic research. BMJ. 2002, 324 (7336): 539-541. 10.1136/bmj.324.7336.539.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Vittinghoff E, McCulloch CE: Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression. Am J Epidemiol. 2007, 165 (6): 710-718. 10.1093/aje/kwk052.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/10/143/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.