High adsorption capacity of hemoperfusion on imipenem in critically ill patients with septic shock: a case report

Abstract

Background

Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by an excessive host response to infection, manifested by elevated levels of inflammatory cytokines. At present, the use of hemoperfusion to remove inflammatory cytokines from the bloodstream has been expanding. Meanwhile, the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics characteristics of antibiotics in critically ill patients may be impacted by hemoperfusion.

Case presentation

The patient was a 69-year-old male with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. When admitted to the ICU, Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome (MODS) appeared within 48 h, and he was suspected of septic shock due to acute granulocytopenia and significantly increased procalcitonin. Broad-spectrum antibiotics imipenem was administered according to Sepsis 3.0 bundle and hemoperfusion lasting 4 h with a neutron-macroporous resin device (HA-380, Jafron, China) five times was conducted to lower the extremely high value of serum inflammatory factors. Blood samples were collected to measure imipenem plasma concentration to investigate the effect of hemoperfusion quantitatively. This study showed that 4 h of hemoperfusion had a good adsorption ability on inflammatory factors and could remove about 75.2% of imipenem.

Conclusions

This case demonstrated the high adsorption capacity of hemoperfusion on imipenem in critically ill patients. It implies a timely imipenem supplement is required, especially before hemoperfusion.

Background

Sepsis manifests as potentially fatal organ dysfunction with a high level of inflammatory cytokines due to the dysregulated host response to infection [1, 2]. It has raised a public health concern [1] as a leading cause of mortality worldwide [3, 4]. In mainland China, about one-fifth of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) were diagnosed with sepsis, with a 90-day mortality rate of 35.5% [5]. Effective antibiotic treatment is crucial and should be initiated as soon as possible [6]. Vincent et al. [7] demonstrated that Gram-negative bacterial infections accounted for 67% of severe infection patients. Carbapenems, such as imipenem, are commonly used as empirical therapy [8].

Hemoperfusion is a technique of blood purification relying on the interaction of target molecules with a sorbent [9]. There are various types of hemoperfusion cartridges targeting endotoxins or cytokines globally [9]. Though it benefits inflammatory cytokines absorption, hemoperfusion may affect the pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics of antibiotics. Beyond complicating the hemodynamic state, hemoperfusion can also affect the concentration of antibiotics in the patient’s body, thus may partially affect the effectiveness of anti-infective treatment. Therefore, how does the PK of antibiotics change? How do we optimize the dosage regimen in septic patients undergoing hemoperfusion? Few studies [10] focused on imipenem absorption and dose adjustment during hemoperfusion. By estimating PK parameters before and after 4-hour hemoperfusion, we aim to describe the hemoperfusion absorption ability of imipenem and provide the optimized strategy for imipenem administration under hemoperfusion.

Case presentation

The patient was a 69-year-old male with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. Following a cerebral hemorrhage and craniotomy, he developed severe pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) within 24 h. We transferred him to the ICU on July 28th, 2020 (D1) after his second intubation. Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome (MODS) appeared within 48 h. In addition, he had the complications of acute heart failure (left ventricular ejection fraction decreased from 61 to 30%, impaired diastolic function, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide: 26700 pg/mL), acute kidney injury (serum creatinine: 332 µmol/L, with anuria), acute liver injury (elevated levels of aminotransferase [alanine aminotransferase: 187 U/L] and bilirubin [total bilirubin: 84.2 umol/L], coagulation disorder [fibrinogen: 7.16 g/L, fibrinogen and fibrin degradation products: 24.3 ug/mL, D-Dimer: 3.16 ug/mL] with hypoproteinemia [albumin: 20.9 g/L], dropped from Child-Pugh class A to B), granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia (white blood cell count: 0.71 × 10^9/L, neutrophil count: 0.43 × 10^9/L, platelet count: 68 × 10^9/L). When admitted to the ICU, he was suspected of septic shock due to acute granulocytopenia and significantly increased procalcitonin (from 8 ng/mL to 74 ng/mL in 31 h).

Based on the Sepsis 3.0 bundle, we collected the patient’s blood, urine, sputum, and other body fluids for etiological examination (including smears, cultures, and metagenomics next-generation sequencing (mNGS), and the broad-spectrum antibiotics imipenem and cilastatin sodium (0.5 g/0.5 g, q6h, prolonged infusion to 2 h) were immediately administered, together with vancomycin. At the same time, we implanted PiCCO for hemodynamic parameters-guided fluid resuscitation. Dobutamine, mechanical ventilation, and continuous veno venous hemofiltration (CVVH, blood flow rate: 180 mL/min, replacement fluid rate for pre/post-dilution: 1200 mL/h, ultrafiltration rate: 35.2 mL/[h×kg]) were also used. The application indication of CVVH was septic shock with acute kidney injury. mNGS detected Klebsiella pneumoniae in sputum and blood samples, consistent with the subsequent culture results in the same samples. Meanwhile, such the extremely high value of serum inflammatory factors was detected, as interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-8, and IL-10 being 3.31 × 10^10 pg/mL, 9.21 × 10^4 pg/mL, and 266.06 pg/ml respectively (Fig. 1A). Hemoperfusion was needed since CVVH can not remove macromolecular inflammatory cytokines. We then performed hemoperfusion with a neutron-macroporous resin device (HA-380, Jafron, China) five times from July 28th to August 1st (D1—D5) [11,12,13,14]. Hemoperfusion lasted 4 h each time, and CVVH treatment continued throughout the whole course (Fig. 1B). On August 4th, after five times of hemoperfusion, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10 decreased to 40.16 pg/mL, 224.51 pg/mL, and 5.91 pg/mL, respectively (Fig. 1A), which indicates a good adsorption ability of hemoperfusion on inflammatory factors.

Fig. 1

(A). Values of IL-6, IL-8 and IL-10 from 7/28/2020 to 8/4/2020. (This patient received hemoperfusion five times from July 28th to August 1st (D1—D5), and IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10, which were determined by flow cytometry, decreased gradually.); (B). The ideograph of hemoperfusion and CVVH. (The vena jugularis interna draws and returns blood. The red line represents the blood route, and the black line indicates the introduction of anticoagulants (sodium citrate). The red arrow represents the direction of blood flow. The dotted box indicates hemoperfusion for 4 h each time, which was withdrawn at the end. CVVH, continuous veno venous hemofiltration.) (C). The observed and predicted imipenem plasma concentration-time profiles of this patient. (“a” represents intravenous imipenem, and the infusion duration was 2 h. The sampling times were 15 min before administration, 30 min after the completion of the infusion, before hemoperfusion, and after hemoperfusion. Light gray area indicates CVVH treatment, and dark gray area indicates CVVH and hemoperfusion treatment. Solid square represents the observed value, and the solid line represents the observed curve. Solid dots represent predicted values, and the dotted lines represent predicted curves. It should be mentioned that the predicted values were obtained from the scenario assuming only CVVH without hemoperfusion therapy.)

To quantitatively investigate the effect of hemoperfusion on imipenem, blood samples were taken to measure the plasma concentration before and after hemoperfusion on August 1st (D5), five days following CVVH, hemoperfusion, and anti-infective therapy. As imipenem has a half-life of about 1 h, it was assumed the plasma concentration of imipenem had reached the steady state. Plasma was separated by centrifuge and stored at -80℃ until assayed. The plasma concentrations of imipenem were measured using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography (Shimadzu LC-30 A; Shimadzu, JP) coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (ABSciex 4000 + triple quadrupole system, ABSciex Corp., USA) method. The data was acquired and processed by Analyst 1.6.2 software (ABSciex Corp.). A 200 µL plasma sample was processed by protein precipitation. A total of four samples were collected. The sampling times were 15 min before administration (13:45), 30 min after the completion of the infusion (16:30, which was known as the peak concentration [15], and the infusion time was two hours), before hemoperfusion (17:00), and after hemoperfusion (21:00). The concentrations of imipenem in each time were 16.2 mg/L, 24 mg/L, 19.9 mg/L, and 3.47 mg/L correspondingly (Fig. 1C).

In addition, the PK parameters were calculated using the first-order conditional estimation method [16] through NONMEM version 7.2.0 software (ICON Development Solutions). One- and two-compartment models with first-order absorption and linear elimination were investigated to determine the optimal structural model. Because we only had one patient, the inter-individual variability was fixed at 0, and hemoperfusion was included as the covariate. Finally, the one-compartment model was chosen as it better described the data. The estimated PK parameters are summarized in Table 1. The clearance of this patient only during CVVH and during CVVH combined hemoperfusion was 4.25 L/h and 18.05 L/h, respectively. Besides, the PK model estimated the blood concentration of imipenem at 21:00 to be 13.99 mg/L assuming without hemoperfusion (Fig. 1C), and the actual concentration after hemoperfusion was 3.47 mg/L. That means 4-hour hemoperfusion cleared about 75.2% of imipenem. It suggests that 750 mg of imipenem at the beginning of hemoperfusion for this patient, estimated by the current PK model, would achieve enough imipenem concentration (10.08 mg/L), which is close to 13.99 mg/L. The various dosages simulated by the model and their predicted concentrations after hemoperfusion are shown in Table 2.

Table 1 Pharmacokinetic parameters estimated of imipenem for this patient

Table 2 Predicted concentrations after hemoperfusion of different doses at the start of hemoperfusion

This patient underwent a tracheotomy once the infection was controlled (D10). After breathing and limb rehabilitation exercises, the patient was weaned off the ventilator (D75) and returned to carry out bed activities. He was transferred to a rehabilitation hospital on November 1st, 2020 (D97), and has partially recovered his independent living ability.

Discussion and conclusions

At present, an increasing number of studies show that hemoperfusion can effectively remove inflammatory cytokines in septic patients. Blocking or attenuating the impact of inflammatory cytokines offers protection in acute animal models of fulminant infections [14, 17]. Hemoperfusion can theoretically deliver non-specific treatment, based on several mediators’ plasma levels rather than targeting single cytokines, which has failed before [14, 18, 19]. With new biocompatible sorbent cartridges, the removal of humoral mediators and cytokines with different columns (CytoSorb^®, Cytosorbents, NJ, USA, and HA380, Jafron, China, which the patients used) may be beneficial for the septic patients [14, 20]. In this case, inflammatory cytokines declined rapidly after hemoperfusion, which proved its great clearance ability.

Hemoperfusion may also remove antibiotics and affect the efficacy of anti-infective therapy. International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock [6] recommended empiric broad-spectrum therapy with one or more antimicrobials for patients presenting with sepsis or septic shock to cover all likely pathogens, so carbapenems were usually the first choice. However, scarce evidence exists about how to adjust the antibiotics dosage regimen. A prospective PK study [21] was conducted at a tertiary hospital to evaluate the effect of direct hemoperfusion with polymyxin B immobilized cartridge (DHP-PMX) on meropenem PK in ICU patients with sepsis requiring CVVH. It demonstrated that DHP-PMX does not exhibit a significant effect on meropenem PK, and dose adjustment is unrequired. There are no related studies about imipenem, a very common carbapenem antibiotic in the Sepsis Bundle. Our study showed that 4 h of hemoperfusion could remove about 75.2% of imipenem, owing to the lower molecular weight of imipenem than meropenem (299.346 vs. 383.463 Dalton) or the differences of columns used in the hemoperfusion [14]. Given the central nervous system toxicity of imipenem, as well as to balance the effectiveness of imipenem and its safety, we suggest a 150% dose administration at the start of hemoperfusion.

There are three limitations of this study. Firstly, blood samples were collected only before and after hemoperfusion, resulting in missing details of the PK profile during hemoperfusion. Therefore, results estimated by mathematical methods still need to be further verified. In addition, since the patient received hemoperfusion and CVVH simultaneously, it was hard to measure the effect of hemoperfusion directly. Previous studies [22] have demonstrated that imipenem can be cleared by CVVH, but this patient has been receiving CVVH therapy before and after hemoperfusion, and the parameters of CVVH have not been changed. We may have concentrated on the relative difference in serum imipenem concentration between pre- and post-hemoperfusion, since this may indicated the adsorption capacity of hemoperfusion. Finally, only the concentration of imipenem was determined, and cilastatin was considered ineffective except for inhibiting renal clearance of imipenem by default as the patient was anuric. However, cilastatin absorption by hemoperfusion can’t be ignored for patients with urine as it may affect the activity of imipenem.

This case illustrated that about 75% of imipenem was removed after 4-hour hemoperfusion using HA380 resin hemoperfusion cartridge. It implies a timely imipenem supplement is required, especially before hemoperfusion, which can be beneficial to keep adequate antibiotic concentration during the hemoperfusion. As we only had one patient, future studies are needed to validate the conclusion.