Skip to main content
Download PDF

Immune response to the recombinant herpes zoster vaccine in people living with HIV over 50 years of age compared to non-HIV age-/gender-matched controls (SHINGR’HIV): a multicenter, international, non-randomized clinical trial study protocol

BMC Infectious Diseases volume 24, Article number: 329 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The burden of herpes zoster (shingles) virus and associated complications, such as post-herpetic neuralgia, is higher in older adults and has a significant impact on quality of life. The incidence of herpes zoster and post-herpetic neuralgia is increased in people living with HIV (PLWH) compared to an age-matched general population, including PLWH on long-term antiretroviral therapy (ART) with no detectable viremia and normal CD4 counts. PLWH – even on effective ART may- exhibit sustained immune dysfunction, as well as defects in cells involved in the response to vaccines. In the context of herpes zoster, it is therefore important to assess the immune response to varicella zoster virus vaccination in older PLWH and to determine whether it significantly differs to that of HIV-uninfected healthy adults or younger PLWH. We aim at bridging these knowledge gaps by conducting a multicentric, international, non-randomised clinical study (SHINGR’HIV) with prospective data collection after vaccination with an adjuvant recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) in two distinct populations: in PLWH on long-term ART (> 10 years) over 50 years of and age/gender matched controls.

Methods

We will recruit participants from two large established HIV cohorts in Switzerland and in France in addition to age-/gender-matched HIV-uninfected controls. Participants will receive two doses of RZV two months apart. In depth-evaluation of the humoral, cellular, and innate immune responses and safety profile of the RZV will be performed to address the combined effect of aging and potential immune deficiencies due to chronic HIV infection. The primary study outcome will compare the geometric mean titer (GMT) of gE-specific total IgG measured 1 month after the second dose of RZV between different age groups of PLWH and between PLWH and age-/gender-matched HIV-uninfected controls.

Discussion

The SHINGR’HIV trial will provide robust data on the immunogenicity and safety profile of RZV in older PLWH to support vaccination guidelines in this population.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05575830. Registered on 12 October 2022. Eu Clinical Trial Register (EUCT number 2023-504482-23-00).

Peer Review reports

Background

The burden of herpes zoster (HZ) virus, also known as shingles, and associated complications such as post-herpetic neuralgia is higher in older adults and has a significant impact on the quality of life in this population [1]. HZ is caused by the reactivation of the varicella zoster virus (VZV) that remains latent in the nervous system after previous infection. Each year In the USA, HZ develops in half a million people aged 60 years and over [2]. In people living with HIV (PLWH), the incidence of shingles and post-herpetic neuralgia is significantly increased compared to an age-matched general population, even in those on long-term antiretroviral therapy (ART) with no detectable viremia and normal CD4 counts [3, 4].

A recent meta-analysis of reported HZ cases, excluding patients on immunosuppressive medication, showed a greater risk of HZ among adults with HIV/AIDS compared to controls (relative risk = 3.22; 95% CI, 2.40–4.33) [5]. While the introduction of ART reduced HZ incidence, it remains a significant issue in this population [6, 7], especially for older PLWH due to the combined impact of HIV-related immunosuppression and age-related immunosenescence [8]. Indeed, It is well established that PLWH exhibit a sustained immune dysfunction despite viral suppression under ART [9,10,11]. Defects in the T- and B-cell memory response have been reported, as well as in T follicular helper (Tfh) cells that are essential for the formation of a high and functional antibody response [12, 13]. The follicular architecture of the lymph node, a site where T- and B-cells interact to mount an effective antibody response to vaccines, is altered in PLWH, which may explain why these patients have less Tfh cells. Although vaccines remain generally immunogenic in PLWH in term of antibody levels there is a paucity of data assessing cellular (T and B lymphocytes)responses to vaccines s in PLWH, which may be specifically reduced compared to HIV-uninfected controls, as observed after influenza vaccination [14]. Importantly, HIV infection worsens the effect of age on the responsiveness to influenza vaccine [15, 16]. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) latent infection in these patients may also contribute to an hypo-responsiveness to vaccines [17]. In the context of HZ and zoster vaccination, whereby cellular responses are particularly important, it is therefore relevant to assess whether the magnitude and/or the quality of the VZV-specific antibody and T-cell response in older PLWH are the same as in HIV-uninfected individuals or younger PLWH.

In addition to antibody and T-cell responses, there is also evidence that innate immunity, such as monocyte function, is specifically altered in PLWH and that baseline systemic inflammation is elevated in this population [11, 18]. These mechanisms may interfere with the mode of action of vaccines relying on the activation of innate immunity, such as adjuvanted or mRNA-based vaccines [19, 20]. However, data accumulated during the H1N1 2009 pandemic with the AS03- and MF59-adjuvanted vaccines showed that adjuvanted vaccines has shown an acceptable safety profile and effective despite in PLWH [21, 22]. Although most data were generated in relatively young populations [23, 24], this may indicate that adjuvants could help to overcome the immune dysregulation in this population.

There are currently two approved zoster vaccines. The live attenuated zoster vaccine (Zostavax®, Merck & Co,) and is well tolerated and modestly increases VZV-specific antibodies in PLWH on ART [25, 26]. The adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) (Shingrix®, GlaxoSmithKline,) has been approved in the USA in 2017 and more recently in the European Union and Switzerland. In Switzerland, RZV is recommended for the prevention of HZ in (a) everyone aged 65 years and older, (b) in those over 50 years old living with a current or future state of immunosuppression associated with a higher risk for HZ (such as all PLWH), and (c) in those over 18 years old who are severely immunosuppressed, such as PLWH with CD4 counts ≤ 200c/µL or < 15%. RZV is a subunit vaccine containing the VZV glycoprotein E (gE) antigen and the adjuvant system AS01B (a liposomal formulation containing monophosphoryl lipid A and QS-21). RZV vaccination has an acceptable safety profile [27] and leads to high and sustained efficacy against HZ (> 84%), including in people aged 70 years and above) [28,29,30], and is expected to be at least cost effective [31] and potentially cost-saving [32] in aged patients (≥ 50 years) [33, 34]. It is thought that both the antibody and T-cell response to the vaccine are important to prevent reactivation of VZV and HZ [35].

The immune response to RZV is characterized by robust and long-lasting gE-specific antibodies and CD4 + T-cell responses, but with no or limited induction of CD8 + cytotoxic T-cells [36, 37]. However, only very limited data are available on the immunogenicity and safety of RZV in PLWH, especially in those with lower levels of CD4 T-cells and with additional risk factors, such as age or comorbidities. In a randomized phase II study including 123 HIV patients, RZV was shown to be immunogenic and well tolerated [38]. Although RZV induced a detectable immune response after two doses with no additional benefit of a third dose, the response was not compared to age-matched healthy adults. Of note, the mean age of patients in the study was 46.6 (range, 23–74) years and therefore, no data exist for adult PLWH > 75 years of age (YOA) who may be the least responsive to the vaccine. In addition, participants had a viral RNA load of < 40 copies/mL at baseline and most had relatively high CD4 + T-cell counts with an average of 594.31 ± 273.55 cells/µl in the entire cohort, thus leaving a data gap for those with lower residual T-cells.

Vaccination, including with non-adjuvanted vaccines, can induce a transient increase in HIV viral load, although with little or no clinical significance on the course of the HIV infection [39,40,41]. In Yek C et al., an increase in HIV RNA was reported in some participants in both RVZ and placebo recipients, but with no statistically significant difference between groups [41]. A better characterization of the effect of RZV on HIV viral load is warranted in different HIV populations, i.e., among the elderly [42] and those on long-term ART.

In this multicenter, international, non-randomized clinical trial we will perform an in-depth evaluation of the immunogenicity and safety profile of RZV in PLWH > 50 YOA on long-term ART (> 10 years) and compare the results across age-groups and to non-HIV age-/gender-matched controls to investigate the combined effect of aging and immunosuppression due to chronic HIV disease. The specific objectives of the study include the following: (1) To evaluate whether immune dysregulation to a long history of HIV disease/ART impacts the immunogenicity (antibody and T-cell response) of the RZV vaccine in aged PLWH compared to age-/gender-matched healthy controls; (2) To assess whether age impacts immunogenicity in PLWH; (3) To assess the benefit/risk profile of RZV vaccine in PLWH, irrespective of age, by monitoring reactogenicity and unsolicited adverse events after vaccination; (4) To determine the effect of vaccination on HIV viral load; (5) To compare inflammatory responses induced by RZV in PLHW and controls; (6) To identify pre-vaccination markers (e.g., pre-existing immunity to the vaccine antigen, CMV status, ageing immune markers) predictive of the vaccine response.

Methods

The trial will be sponsored by the HIV Unit, Department of Infectious Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals (Geneva, Switzerland). The study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05575830) and on the Eu Clinical Trial Register (EUCT number 2023-504482-23-00).

Study design and sites

The SHINGR’HIV trial is a multicentric, international non-randomized clinical study with prospective data collection after vaccination with an adjuvant recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) in two distinct populations: PLWH on long-term ART (> 10 years) over 50 years of age and age/gender matched controls (phase IV - post marketing in Switzerland and phase II studies in PLWH and non-HIV infected controls in France because at the time of protocol approval, the vaccine was not commercially available in France). Participants will be recruited at seven clinical sites in Switzerland and at one site in France. The clinical study will have two groups, PLWH and non- HIV infected control participants, who will receive two doses of RZV two months apart. Participants will be enrolled in the main study, which includes four visits with four blood draws (Fig. 1a). Consenting participants will have the possibility to be included in the innate immunity sub-study, which includes two additional visits and blood sampling on the day after each vaccine dose (Fig. 1b). The trial will be conducted at the following institutions: Geneva University Hospitals; University Hospital Basel; Bern University Hospital; University Hospital of Lausanne; Lugano Cantonal Hospital; Kantonsspital St. Gallen, and Zurich University Hospital in Switzerland; and Bordeaux University Hospital in France.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Timeline for study procedures and visits for the main study (a) and innate sub-study (b). Abbreviations: RZV, recombinant zoster virus; D, day

Full size image

Study population and recrutement

The study will consist of six groups (Fig. 2). PLWH participants will be stratified in three age groups (N = 50 per group): >75 YOA; between 60 and 75 YOA; and between 50 and 59 YOA. Gender-matched healthy adults will be stratified following the same age ranges (N = 25 per group). Gender matching will be performed as follows: for every two men or women included in one age strata in the PLWH group, one man or one woman in the same age strata will be included in the control group. At least fifteen participants of each group will be included in the innate sub-study PLWH will be recruited from two large established HIV cohorts: the Swiss HIV cohort study (SHCS) and the French National Agency for AIDS Research (Agence Nationale de la Recherche sur le SIDA et les hépatites virales [ANRS]) CO3 Aquivih-NA cohort in Aquitaine. This gives access to bio-banked biological specimens and the medical history of the participants of the study. Controls participants will be recruited from distinct sources: (1) Patients followed at the Bordeaux University Hospital’s multidisciplinary health center, a multi-professional medical center attached to the CHU de Bordeaux; (2) Healthy volunteer cohort of the Bordeaux University Hospital; (3) Participants already followed as part of the GERICO cohort, which is the Geneva Retiree Cohort, recruited from the general population and prospectively followed to assess their bone health evolution.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Stratification of the study population according to the age (YOA). Abbreviations PLWH, people living with HIV; YOA, years of age

Full size image

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria for PLWH participants are: (1) already registered in the SHCS or ANRS CO3 Aquitaine cohort; (2) age > 50 YOA; (3) time since first ART initiation > 10 years; d) not already vaccinated with RZV; (4) HIV viral load < 50 copies/ml; (5) informed consent as documented by signature; and (only for French candidates) person affiliated with or beneficiary of the French social security scheme. Inclusion criteria for age-/gender-matched controls are: (1) age > 50 YOA; (2) not already vaccinated with RZV; (3) informed consent as documented by signature; (4) not HIV infected; and (5) (only for French candidates) person affiliated with or beneficiary of the French social security scheme.

Participants will be excluded if they meet any of the following criteria: (a) ongoing signs of febrile or non-febrile infection at the time of the first vaccination; (b) Immunosuppression due to current malignant neoplasm, primary immunodeficiency or recent (< 2 years) solid or bone-marrow transplant or any transplant still requiring immunosuppressive therapy; (c) intake of drugs that suppress the immune system (e.g., glucocorticoids over a long period of time [an equivalent dose of prednisone > 20 mg/day > 3 months]), monoclonal antibodies, cytostatics, biological products) within 6 months prior to enrollment; (d) having received any other vaccine than RZV in the last month or expected to receive any vaccine other than RZV in the following month; (e) having received a shingles vaccine within one year; (f) presented with HZ in the previous year; (g) contraindication to RZV; (h) hospitalized patients; (i) unable to provide informed consent or inability to follow the study procedures, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, etc.; (j) participation in another study with an investigational drug within the 30 days preceding study entry or during the study; k) pregnant or breastfeeding woman; and l) (only for French candidates) patient governed by articles L 1121-5 to L 1121-8 (persons deprived of their liberty by a judicial or administrative decision, minors, persons of legal age who are the object of a legal protection measure or unable to express their consent).

Intervention

Consenting participants will receive two doses of RZV two months apart. Each dose contains 50 µg of VZV glycoprotein E (gE), produced in Chinese hamster ovary cells by recombinant DNA technology, the adjuvant AS01B containing 50 µg of a purified plant extract Quillaja saponaria Molina, fraction 21 (QS-21), and 50 µg of the Toll-like receptor 4 ligand 3-O-desacyl-4’-monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL) from Salmonella Minnesota [35]. RZV will be prepared and injected according to the manufacturer’s instructions. No dosage modification is expected for study participants. The second dose of the vaccine may not be given in the case of a contraindication appearing after the first dose (e.g. hypersensitivity reaction). The patient may decide to withdraw his/her participation at any time.

Outcome measures

The primary outcome is the geometric mean titer (GMT) of gE-specific total IgG measured at day (D) 90 (1 month after the second vaccine dose) by ELISA. Secondary outcomes will include: mean of gE-specific CD4 + T-cells expressing at least two activation markers (i.e., a combination of the following markers: CD40L, intracellular IFN-gamma, IL-2 or TNF-alpha) after activation by a pool of peptides covering the entire gE (ref: 31) and measured at D90; kinetics of the GMT of gE-specific IgG measured at D0, D60, D90 and D360; kinetics of the gE-specific CD4 + T-cells expressing at least two activation markers measured at D0, D90, and D360; vaccine response rate for antibody defined as the percentage of individuals with a ≥ 4-fold increase in the anti-gE antibody concentration compared to the pre-vaccination concentration (for initially seropositive participants) or compared to the anti-gE antibody cut-off value for seropositivity (for initially seronegative participants); and the vaccine response rate for T-cells defined as the percentage of individuals with a ≥ 2-fold increase in the frequency of specific CD4 + T-cells compared to pre-vaccination frequencies or a ≥ 2-fold increase above the cut-off (for participants with pre-vaccination frequencies below the cut-off).

Changes in the level of serum pro-inflammatory markers (including a panel of cytokines and c-reactive protein) between D0 and D1 (first dose) and between D60 and D61 (second dose) will be measured using a multiplex assay for the innate sub-study. The differential expression of innate and adaptive immune response genes and associated pathways at D1 and D60 compared to D0 (first dose) and at D61 and D90 compared to D60 (second dose) will be assessed by RNAseq. Samples will be used for a more in-depth exploratory analysis of the immune response and the identification of potential clinical or biological markers associated with the vaccine response. For example, we will measure changes in the activation and memory markers on gE-specific T- and B-cells by flow cytometry and in the functionality of antibodies using specifically designed assays. We will also investigate biomarkers at baseline such as CMV serological status, and CD4 T-cell count,associated with a potential reduction in vaccine response.

Safety outcomes will include the incidence of solicited local and systemic adverse events (AEs) in the 7 days following each vaccine dose (reactogenicity) collected in a diary questionnaire (Table 1). Unsolicited AEs will be collected for 28 days after each vaccine dose. Serious AEs and the incidence of potential immune-mediated disorders [43] will be collected throughout the study period. Finally, given the historical evidence of the effect of vaccines on HIV viral load, the percentage of PLWH with a HIV viral load > 50 copies/ml will be measured 1 month after the second vaccine dose (D90).

Table 1 Adverse events diary questionnaire
Full size table

Visit schedule

Potential eligible participants will be screened by a phone call or during a routine hospital visit at least 7 days before study inclusion to allow sufficient time to provide consent to study participation. At the inclusion visit (D0), written consent will be collected before starting any procedure. For the main study, there will be four on-site visits (D0, D60, D90, D360) and one phone call (D28) (Fig. 1a), while for the innate sub-study there will be six on-site visits (D0, D1, D60, D61, D90, D360) and one phone call (D28) (Fig. 1b). Vaccine doses will be given at D0 and D60 ± 7 days. If a temporary contra-indication occurs, the vaccine could be delayed at the shortest interval possible, but up to 6 months after the first injection.

Justification of sample size

We hypothesize that anti-gE specific IgG GMT at D90 will differ between the PLWH group and the non-HIV group and assume that a GMT difference of 25–30% is clinically relevant. Based on data from 1070 healthy individuals of 50 YOA and older available in the ‘Summary of Product Characteristic’(44), we assumed a reference value of anti-gE specific IgG geometric mean concentration in the control group of 52377 mUI/mL with an upper limit of the 95% CI of 54578 mUI/mL. The standard deviation of the natural log of the mean was 0.68. Given the fact that we can expect a more heterogeneous response in PLWH, we increased the standard deviation by 20% to 0.82 natural log mUI/mL. Using a two-tailed parametric test (t-test; SAS Proc POWER two sample means) with β = 0.2 (80% power), α = 0.05, a sample size of 150 in the PLWH group and 75 in the non-HIV group will allow to detect a difference of 14649.5 mUI/mL for anti-gE antibodies (representing 28% of the mean value measured in healthy adults). Based on data from the above-mentioned study, this sample size will also allow to have 80% power to detect a difference in T-cell responses of 600 cells per million T-cells (representing 32% of the mean value observed in healthy adults). Assuming 5% loss to follow-up at D90, we would be able to demonstrate a difference of 14995 mUI/mL for anti-gE antibodies and a difference of 616 cells per million T cells between PLWH and non-HIV infected controls.

Statistical analysis

Geometric means and their 95% CIs of gE-specific IgG (primary endpoint) and secondary endpoints will be calculated and graphically described in the PLWH and non-HIV groups and according to age groups. Several statistical approaches (i.e., linear and logistic regression, mixed models, survival models and integrative methods) will also be considered for the analysis of the primary and secondary endpoints. All statistical tests will be two-sided with a significance level of 0.05. Two-sided 95% CIs will be reported. Linear regression models will be adjusted on potential confounders and determined by directed acyclic graphs using the available literature. Baseline anti-gE level, age, gender, ethnicity, and history of shingles will also be considered in the adjusted model. As a secondary analysis, we will add an interaction term, if possible, in the model, to assess for an interaction between age and HIV status. Finally, an integrative approach of all available data generated in this study will also be considered using statistical approaches to relate and down-select several markers among the high-dimensional data, i.e., sPLS or similar techniques. As a sensitivity analysis, we will use multiple imputation to account for missing data. Very few missing data are expected due to the study design, the population studied, and the fact that patients are already participating in cohort studies.

Data collection, management and monitoring

Data will be collected on hard copy case report forms (CRF) by the clinical investigator or designated site staff and entered in the database REDCap™, a certified Good Clinical Practice-compliant electronic clinical data management system used to develop an electronic CRF (eCRF). The eCRF will reflect the study plan and all subject-related datato be collected, including primary immunological and safety outcomes. Data and metadata will be exported from REDCap™ in plain text (CSV, SPSS) for analysis and the entire database will be archived for a minimum period of 15 years. The REDCap™ platform ensures traceability and safety. Data will be stored on identified servers allowing for safety back-ups as needed. Biological material will be identified by a unique participant number and only accessible to authorized personnel. Participant data collected throughout the duration of the study can be analyzed with data from other research groups. For quality control of the study conduct and data collection, all study sites will be monitored by appropriately trained and qualified personnel according to ICH Good Clinical Practice guidelines.

Discussion

In this prospective, multicentre, international open-label phase IV (Switzerland) and phase II (France) clinical trial, we will perform an in depth-evaluation of the humoral, cellular and innate immunogenicity and safety profile of RZV in PLWH over 50 YOA on long-term ART (> 10 years) compared to non-HIV age-/gender-matched controls to address the combined effect of aging and potential immune deficiencies due to chronic HIV infection. Importantly, the profile of the vaccine response in older PLWH will be, for the first time to our knowledge, compared to healthy age-/gender-matched controls. Patients will be recruited from two large HIV cohorts, established for several years in Switzerland and in France, with access to their bio-banked biological specimens and medical history. These data are expected to set the foundation for future studies. We expect to be able to monitor vaccine effectiveness in these two patient cohorts and potentially define immune responses associated with vaccine breakthrough by taking advantage of the bio-banked samples routinely collected in the cohort. Addressing whether RZV remains highly immunogenic with an acceptable safety profile in older PLWH is critical and will support the development of vaccination guidelines in this population. This study is therefore expected to lead to significant contributions to the field and ultimately improve prevention of HZ in PLWH and their quality of life and provide important data for general vaccine response in PLWH.

Trial status

The trial is funded both in Switzerland and in France. The recruitment process has been active in Switzerland since December 2022, and in France since November 2023. Suisse protocol version 2.0 of 21/09/2022, France protocol version 1.1 of 26/06/2023.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

AE:

adverse events

ART:

antiretroviral therapy

CMV:

cytomegalovirus

CRF:

case report form

GMT:

geometric mean titer

HZ:

herpes zoster

PLWH:

people living with HIV

RZV:

recombinant zoster vaccine

SHCS:

Swiss HIV Cohort Study

Tfh:

T follicular helper (cells)

VZV:

varicella-zoster virus

YOA:

years of age

gE:

glycoprotein E

References

  1. Matthews I, Duong M, Parsons VL, Nozad B, Qizilbash N, Patel Y, et al. Burden of disease from shingles and post-herpetic neuralgia in the over 80 year olds in the UK. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(2):e0229224.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Neuzil KM, Griffin MR. Preventing shingles and its complications in older persons. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(11):1079–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Blank LJ, Polydefkis MJ, Moore RD, Gebo KA. Herpes zoster among persons living with HIV in the current ART era. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 1999. 2012;61(2):203–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. McKay SL, Guo A, Pergam SA, Dooling K. Herpes zoster risk in immunocompromised adults in the United States: a systematic review. Clin Infect Dis off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2020;71(7):e125–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Marra F, Parhar K, Huang B, Vadlamudi N. Risk factors for herpes zoster infection: a Meta-analysis. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020;7(1):ofaa005.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Gilbert L, Wang X, Deiss R, Okulicz J, Maves R, Schofield C, et al. Herpes Zoster Rates continue to decline in people living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus but remain higher Than Rates reported in the General US Population. Clin Infect Dis off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2019;69(1):155–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ku HC, Tsai YT, Konara-Mudiyanselage SP, Wu YL, Yu T, Ko NY. Incidence of herpes zoster in HIV-Infected patients undergoing antiretroviral therapy: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2021;10(11):2300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Hawkins KL, Gordon KS, Levin MJ, Weinberg A, Battaglia C, Rodriguez-Barradas MC, HERPES ZOSTER AND HERPES ZOSTER VACCINE RATES AMONG ADULTS LIVING WITH AND WITHOUT HIV IN THE VETERANS AGING COHORT STUDY. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1999. 2018;79(4):527–33.

  9. Appay V, Kelleher AD. Immune activation and immune aging in HIV infection. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2016;11(2):242–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lagathu C, Cossarizza A, Béréziat V, Nasi M, Capeau J, Pinti M. Basic science and pathogenesis of ageing with HIV: potential mechanisms and biomarkers. AIDS Lond Engl. 2017;31(Suppl 2):S105–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Babu H, Ambikan AT, Gabriel EE, Svensson Akusjärvi S, Palaniappan AN, Sundaraj V, et al. Systemic inflammation and the increased risk of Inflamm-Aging and Age-Associated diseases in people living with HIV on Long Term suppressive antiretroviral therapy. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1965.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Wheatley AK, Kristensen AB, Lay WN, Kent SJ. HIV-dependent depletion of influenza-specific memory B cells impacts B cell responsiveness to seasonal influenza immunisation. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):26478.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Cole ME, Saeed Z, Shaw AT, Guo Y, Höschler K, Winston A, et al. Responses to Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine reveal distinct circulating CD4 + CXCR5 + T cell subsets in men living with HIV. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):15650.

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Moysi E, Pallikkuth S, De Armas LR, Gonzalez LE, Ambrozak D, George V, et al. Altered immune cell follicular dynamics in HIV infection following influenza vaccination. J Clin Invest. 2018;128(7):3171–85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. George VK, Pallikkuth S, Parmigiani A, Alcaide M, Fischl M, Arheart KL, et al. HIV infection worsens Age-Associated defects in antibody responses to Influenza Vaccine. J Infect Dis. 2015;211(12):1959–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Parmigiani A, Alcaide ML, Freguja R, Pallikkuth S, Frasca D, Fischl MA, et al. Impaired antibody response to Influenza Vaccine in HIV-Infected and uninfected aging women is Associated with Immune activation and inflammation. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(11):e79816.

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Royston L, Isnard S, Lin J, Routy JP. Cytomegalovirus as an uninvited guest in the response to vaccines in people living with HIV. Viruses. 2021;13(7):1266.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. George VK, Pallikkuth S, Pahwa R, de Armas LR, Rinaldi S, Pan L, et al. Circulating inflammatory monocytes contribute to impaired influenza vaccine responses in HIV-infected participants. AIDS Lond Engl. 2018;32(10):1219–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Del Giudice G, Rappuoli R, Didierlaurent AM. Correlates of adjuvanticity: a review on adjuvants in licensed vaccines. Semin Immunol. 2018;39:14–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Verbeke R, Hogan MJ, Loré K, Pardi N. Innate immune mechanisms of mRNA vaccines. Immunity. 2022;55(11):1993–2005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. O’Hagan DT, Lodaya RN, Lofano G. The continued advance of vaccine adjuvants– ‘we can work it out’. Semin Immunol. 2020;50:101426.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Manuel O, Pascual M, Hoschler K, Giulieri S, Alves D, Ellefsen K, et al. Humoral response to the Influenza A H1N1/09 monovalent AS03-Adjuvanted vaccine in immunocompromised patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(2):248–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Calmy A, Bel M, Nguyen A, Combescure C, Delhumeau C, Meier S, et al. Strong serological responses and HIV RNA increase following AS03-adjuvanted pandemic immunization in HIV-infected patients. HIV Med. 2012;13(4):207–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Durando P, Fenoglio D, Boschini A, Ansaldi F, Icardi G, Sticchi L, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of two influenza virus subunit vaccines, with or without MF59 adjuvant, administered to human immunodeficiency virus type 1-seropositive and -seronegative adults. Clin Vaccine Immunol CVI. 2008;15(2):253–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Benson CA, Andersen JW, Macatangay BJC, Mailliard RB, Rinaldo CR, Read S, et al. Safety and Immunogenicity of Zoster Vaccine live in human immunodeficiency virus-infected adults with CD4 + cell counts > 200 Cells/mL virologically suppressed on antiretroviral therapy. Clin Infect Dis off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2018;67(11):1712–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Weinberg A, Levin MJ, Macgregor RR. Safety and immunogenicity of a live attenuated varicella vaccine in VZV-seropositive HIV-infected adults. Hum Vaccin. 2010;6(4):318–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Parikh R, Singer D, Chmielewski-Yee E, Dessart C. Effectiveness and safety of recombinant zoster vaccine: a review of real-world evidence. Hum Vaccines Immunother. 2023;19(3):2263979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cunningham AL, Lal H, Kovac M, Chlibek R, Hwang SJ, Díez-Domingo J, et al. Efficacy of the herpes zoster subunit vaccine in adults 70 years of age or older. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(11):1019–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lal H, Cunningham AL, Godeaux O, Chlibek R, Diez-Domingo J, Hwang SJ, et al. Efficacy of an adjuvanted herpes zoster subunit vaccine in older adults. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(22):2087–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Boutry C, Hastie A, Diez-Domingo J, Tinoco JC, Yu CJ, Andrews C, et al. The Adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine confers long-term protection against herpes zoster: interim results of an extension study of the pivotal phase 3 clinical trials ZOE-50 and ZOE-70. Clin Infect Dis off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2022;74(8):1459–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Giannelos N, Ng C, Curran D. Cost-effectiveness of the recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) against herpes zoster: an updated critical review. Hum Vaccines Immunother. 2023;19(1):2168952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Singer D, Salem A, Stempniewicz N, Ma S, Poston S, Curran D. The potential impact of increased recombinant zoster vaccine coverage on the burden of herpes zoster among adults aged 50–59 years. Vaccine. 2023;41(37):5360–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Strezova A, Diez-Domingo J, Al Shawafi K, Tinoco JC, Shi M, Pirrotta P, et al. Long-term protection against herpes zoster by the Adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine: Interim Efficacy, Immunogenicity, and Safety results up to 10 years after initial vaccination. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022;9(10):ofac485.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Kim JH, Johnson R, Kovac M, Cunningham AL, Amakrane M, Sullivan KM, et al. Adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine decreases herpes zoster-associated pain and the use of pain medication across 3 randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Pain. 2023;164(4):741–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lecrenier N, Beukelaers P, Colindres R, Curran D, De Kesel C, De Saegher JP, et al. Development of adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine and its implications for shingles prevention. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2018;17(7):619–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Cunningham AL, Heineman TC, Lal H, Godeaux O, Chlibek R, Hwang SJ, et al. Immune responses to a recombinant glycoprotein E herpes zoster vaccine in adults aged 50 years or older. J Infect Dis. 2018;217(11):1750–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Levin MJ, Kroehl ME, Johnson MJ, Hammes A, Reinhold D, Lang N, et al. Th1 memory differentiates recombinant from live herpes zoster vaccines. J Clin Invest. 2018;128(10):4429–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Berkowitz EM, Moyle G, Stellbrink HJ, Schürmann D, Kegg S, Stoll M, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of an adjuvanted herpes zoster subunit candidate vaccine in HIV-infected adults: a phase 1/2a randomized, placebo-controlled study. J Infect Dis. 2015;211(8):1279–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kolber MA, Gabr AH, De La Rosa A, Glock JA, Jayaweera D, Miller N, et al. Genotypic analysis of plasma HIV-1 RNA after influenza vaccination of patients with previously undetectable viral loads. AIDS Lond Engl. 2002;16(4):537–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Staprans SI, Hamilton BL, Follansbee SE, Elbeik T, Barbosa P, Grant RM, et al. Activation of virus replication after vaccination of HIV-1-infected individuals. J Exp Med. 1995;182(6):1727–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Yek C, Gianella S, Plana M, Castro P, Scheffler K, García F, et al. Standard vaccines increase HIV-1 transcription during antiretroviral therapy. AIDS Lond Engl. 2016;30(15):2289–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Weinberg A, Schmid DS, Leung J, Johnson MJ, Miao C, Levin MJ. Predictors of five-year persistence of antibody responses to Zoster vaccines. J Infect Dis. 2023;jiad132.

  43. López-Fauqued M, Campora L, Delannois F, El Idrissi M, Oostvogels L, De Looze FJ, et al. Safety profile of the adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine: pooled analysis of two large randomised phase 3 trials. Vaccine. 2019;37(18):2482–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Summary of product characteristics, Shingrix powder and suspension for suspension for injection Herpes zoster vaccine (recombinant, adjuvanted) [Internet]. Available from:https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/shingrix-epar-product-information_en.pdf

Download references

Acknowledgements

Swiss HIV Cohort Study: This study has been implemented within the framework of the Swiss HIV Cohort Study, supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant #201369), by the SHCS research foundation. The data are gathered by the Five Swiss University Hospitals, two Cantonal Hospitals, 15 affiliated hospitals and 36 private physicians. Members of the Swiss HIV Cohort Study: Abela I, Aebi-Popp K, Anagnostopoulos A, Battegay M, Bernasconi E, Braun DL, Bucher HC, Calmy A, Cavassini M, Ciuffi A, Dollenmaier G, Egger M, Elzi L, Fehr J, Fellay J, Furrer H, Fux CA, Günthard HF (President of the SHCS), Hachfeld A, Haerry D (deputy of “Positive Council”), Hasse B, Hirsch HH, Hoffmann M, Hösli I, Huber M, Jackson-Perry D (patient representatives), Kahlert CR (Chairman of the Mother & Child Substudy), Kaiser L, Keiser O, Klimkait T, Kouyos RD, Kovari H, Kusejko K (Head of Data Centre), Labhardt N, Leuzinger K, Martinez de Tejada B, Marzolini C, Metzner KJ, Müller N, Nemeth J, Nicca D, Notter J, Paioni P, Pantaleo G, Perreau M, Rauch A (Chairman of the Scientific Board), Salazar-Vizcaya L, Schmid P, Speck R, Stöckle M (Chairman of the Clinical and Laboratory Committee), Tarr P, Trkola A, Wandeler G, Weisser M, Yerly S. ANRS CO3 – AQUIVIH-NA Cohort: The ANRS CO3 - AQUIVIH-NA Cohort is a cohort of people living with HIV-1 and followed in the internal medicine or infectious diseases departments of one of the 18 participating hospitals in Nouvelle Aquitaine, France. This cohort is supported by the ANRS│MIE and the CHU de Bordeaux. Members of theANRS CO3 Aquitanie Cohort: Scientific committee: P. Bellecave, P. Blanco, F. Bonnet (Chair), S. Bouchet, D. Breilh, C. Cazanave, S. Desjardin, V. Gaborieau, A. Gimbert, M. Hessamfar, L. Lacaze-Buzy, ME. Lafon, E. Lazaro, O. Leleux., G. Le Moal, D. Malvy, P. Mercié, D. Neau, I. Pellegrin, A. Perrier, V. Petrov-Sanchez, A. Peyrouny-Mazeau, C. Tumiotto, M.O. Vareil, L. Wittkop (Methodologist). Participating centers: Hôpital Saint André, CHU de Bordeaux, Médecine Interne et Maladies Infectieuses, (N. Bernard, F. Bonnet, D. Bronnimann H. Chaussade, D. Dondia, P. Duffau, I. Faure, V. Hémar, M. Hessamfar, W. Jourde, C. Martell, P Mercié, A. Monier, P. Morlat, E. Mériglier, F. Paccalin, R. Paz, E. Riebeiro, C. Rivoisy, MA Vandenhende); Hôpital Pellegrin, CHU de Bordeaux, Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, (L. Barthod, C. Cazanave, FA. Dauchy, A. Desclaux, M. Ducours, H. Dutronc, A. Duvignaud, J. Leitao, M. Lescure, D. Neau, D. Nguyen, D. Malvy, T. Pistone, M. Puges, G. Wirth); Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Médecine Interne et Maladies Infectieuses, (C. Courtault, F. Camou, C. Greib, E. Lazaro, JL. Pellegrin, C. Prot-Leurent, E. Rivière, JF. Viallard); Hôpital d’Agen, Médecine Interne (E. Klément-Fructos, A. Nonis, P. Rispal); Hôpital de Libourne, Médecine Interne (O. Caubet, S. De Faucal, M. Favarel-garrigues, H. Ferrand, S. Tchamgoué); Hôpital de Bayonne, Maladies Infectieuses (L. Alleman, S. Farbos, MO. Vareil, H. Wille); Hôpital de Dax, Médecine Interne et Maladies Infectieuses, (K. André, L. Caunegre, Y. Gérard); Hôpital Saint-Cyr/Villeneuve-sur-Lot, Maladies Infectieuses, (I. Chossat); Hôpital de Mont de Marsan, Médecine Interne et Maladies Infectieuses, (Y. Gerard); Hôpital d’Arcachon, Médecine Interne, (A. Barret, M. Bouet, C. Courtault, M. Roucoules, M. Videcoq); Hôpital de Périgueux, Médecine Interne et Maladies Infectieuses, (B Castan, J. Koffi, N. Rouanes, A. Saunier, JB Zabbe); Hôpital de Pau, Médecine Interne et Maladies Infectieuses, (G. Dumondin, V. Gaborieau); Hôpital d’Orthez, Médecine Interne, (Y. Gerard); CHU de Poitiers, Médecine Interne et Maladies Infectieuses, (G. Beraud, G. Le Moal, M. Catroux, M. Garcia, V. Giraud, JP. Martellosio, F. Roblot, JM. Turmel); Hôpital de Saintes, Médecine Interne, (T. Pasdeloup); Hôpital d’Angoulême, Médecine Interne, (A. Riché, M. Grosset, S. Males, C. Ngo Bell); Hôpital de Jonzac, Maladies Infectieuses, (T. Pasdeloup), Hôpital de Saint jean d’Angely, Maladies Infectieuses, (T. Pasdeloup); Hôpital de Royan, Médecine Interne, (P. Mottaz, T. Pasdeloup); Hôpital de Châtellerault, Médecine Interne (A, Elsendoorn). Other departements: Immunology: P. Blanco, I. Pellegrin; CRB-BBS: C. Carpentier, I. Pellegrin; Virology: P. Bellecave, ME. Lafon, C. Tumiotto; Pharmacology: S. Bouchet, D. Breilh, G. Miremeont-Salamé; Data collection: G. Arnou, P. Camps, S. Delveaux, F. Diarra, L. Gabrea, S. Lawson-Ayayi, W-H. Lai, E. Lenaud, D. Plainchamps, (A) Pougetoux, I. Stragier, (B) Uwamaliya, K. Zara; IT department: V. Conte, M. Gapillout; Project Team: O. Leleux (Project Leader), A. Perrier (Data Manager), A. Peyrouny-Mazeau (Statistitien).

Funding

The study is funded by GlaxoSmithKline Vaccines as an Investigator Sponsored Study, as well as research grants from the French National Agency for AIDS Research (Agence Nationale de la Recherche sur le SIDA et les hépatites virales) and the “Sidaction” association. All data generated in this study will be owned by the sponsor; the funders will have no access to the data and will not be involved in their analyses.

Open access funding provided by University of Geneva

Author information

Author notes

  1. Maxime Hentzien and Fabrice Bonnet have contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. HIV/AIDS Unit, Division of Infectious Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland

    Maxime Hentzien, Stefano Musardo & Alexandra Calmy

  2. University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Reims, France

    Maxime Hentzien

  3. CHU de Bordeaux, Hôpital Saint-André, Service de Médecine Interne et Maladies Infectieuses, Bordeaux, France

    Fabrice Bonnet & Linda Wittkop

  4. Université de Bordeaux, INSERM, Institut Bergonié, BPH, U1219, CIC-EC 1401, Bordeaux, F-33000, France

    Fabrice Bonnet & Olivier Leleux

  5. Department of Infectious Diseases, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland

    Enos Bernasconi

  6. Division of Bone Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland

    Emmanuel Biver

  7. Division Department of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Dominique L. Braun

  8. Service of Infectious Diseases, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudoise (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland

    Aline Munting

  9. Clinical Virology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland

    Karoline Leuzinger

  10. Division of Infectious Disease, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland

    Virginie Prendki

  11. Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, Kantonsspital, St Gallen, Switzerland

    Patrick Schmid

  12. Department of Infectious Diseases, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

    Cornelia Staehelin

  13. Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland

    Marcel Stoeckle & Carla S. Walti

  14. CHU de Bordeaux, Service d’information médicale, INSERM, Institut Bergonié, CIC-EC 1401, Bordeaux, F-33000, France

    Linda Wittkop

  15. Inria équipe SISTM team, Talence, France

    Linda Wittkop

  16. Université de Bordeaux, CNRS UMR 5164, INSERM ERL 1303, ImmunoConcEpT, Bordeaux, 33000, France

    Victor Appay

  17. Department of Pathology and Immunology, Center of Vaccinology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

    Arnaud M. Didierlaurent

Authors
  1. Maxime Hentzien
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fabrice Bonnet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Enos Bernasconi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Emmanuel Biver
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Dominique L. Braun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Aline Munting
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Karoline Leuzinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Olivier Leleux
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Stefano Musardo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Virginie Prendki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Patrick Schmid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Cornelia Staehelin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Marcel Stoeckle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Carla S. Walti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Linda Wittkop
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Victor Appay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Arnaud M. Didierlaurent
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Alexandra Calmy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MH and FB are co-first authors. MH, AMD, AC, FB, LW, VA and SM wrote the protocol. AC and FB are principal investigators in Switzerland and France, respectively. AMD is project lead. All other authors have critically reviewed and completed the final protocol. AMD and VA are lead immunologists for the study. LW is lead statistician for the study. SM, MH, AMD and AC wrote the manuscript, and SM prepared figures and table. All authors have reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Arnaud M. Didierlaurent or Alexandra Calmy.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This trial has received ethical approval from the Geneva Cantonal Commission for Ethics and Research (CCER - BASEC 2022 − 01314) on 20 October 2022, and by the relevant ethics commissions: Kantonale Ethikkommission Bern (14 November 2022), EKNZ (Ethikkommission Nordwest- und Zentralschweiz, 20 November 2022), EKOS (Ethikkommission Ostschweiz, 2 November 2022), Ethikkommission Tessin (24 November 2022), Commission cantonale d’éthique de la recherche sur l’être humain CER-VD (8 November 2022) and Ethikkommission Zürich (1 November 2022). In France the protocol has been approved by the “Comité de Protection des Personnes” and by the “Agence nationale de sécurité du medicament et des produits de santé” on July 20, 2023. The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and with each country’s laws and regulations, as well as with Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice for biomedical research on drugs for human use and ICH Good Clinical Practice E6 (R2) 9 November 2016, European Regulation EU no. 536/2014, and Good Clinical Laboratory Practice (World Health Organization on behalf of the Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases, 2009). Participants must provide signed and dated written informed consent prior to undergoing any study-specific procedure. Participants will have the opportunity to provide consent for the use of health-related data and samples for research purposes.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

DLB reports honoraria for advisory boards payed to himself from the companies AstraZeneca, Gilead, MSD, Pfizer and ViiV. ADM reports honoraria for participation to scientific advisory boards of Speransa, Bioaster, Sanofi, to Data Safety Monitoring Board for AMC Biosciences and speaker bureau for Roche and Merck. All the other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hentzien, M., Bonnet, F., Bernasconi, E. et al. Immune response to the recombinant herpes zoster vaccine in people living with HIV over 50 years of age compared to non-HIV age-/gender-matched controls (SHINGR’HIV): a multicenter, international, non-randomized clinical trial study protocol. BMC Infect Dis 24, 329 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-024-09192-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-024-09192-5

Keywords

BMC Infectious Diseases

ISSN: 1471-2334

Contact us