Skip to main content
Download PDF

Symptomatic MERS-CoV infection reduces the risk of future COVID-19 disease; a retrospective cohort study

BMC Infectious Diseases volume 23, Article number: 757 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The general human immune responses similarity against different coronaviruses may reflect some degree of cross-immunity, whereby exposure to one coronavirus may confer partial immunity to another. The aim was to determine whether previous MERS-CoV infection was associated with a lower risk of subsequent COVID-19 disease and its related outcomes.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study among all patients screened for MERS-CoV at a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia between 2012 and early 2020. Both MERS-CoV positive and negative patients were followed up from early 2020 to September 2021 for developing COVID-19 infection confirmed by RT-PCR testing.

Results

A total of 397 participants followed for an average 15 months during COVID-19 pandemic (4.9 years from MERS-CoV infection). Of the 397 participants, 93 (23.4%) were positive for MERS-CoV at baseline; 61 (65.6%) of the positive cases were symptomatic. Out of 397, 48 (12.1%) participants developed COVID-19 by the end of the follow-up period. Cox regression analysis adjusted for age, gender, and major comorbidity showed a marginally significant lower risk of COVID-19 disease (hazard ratio = 0.533, p = 0.085) and hospital admission (hazard ratio = 0.411, p = 0.061) in patients with positive MERS-CoV. Additionally, the risk of COVID-19 disease was further reduced and became significant in patients with symptomatic MERS-CoV infection (hazard ratio = 0.324, p = 0.034) and hospital admission (hazard ratio = 0.317, p = 0.042).

Conclusions

The current findings may indicate a partial cross-immunity, where patients with symptomatic MERS-CoV have a lower risk of future COVID-19 infection and related hospitalization. The present results may need further examination nationally using immunity markers.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Since the emergence of COVID-19 in December 2019, a significant global public health pandemic emergency has imposed many challenges on healthcare sectors worldwide [1]. This largest pandemic was caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV-2), a virus belonging to a large family of single-stranded RNA coronaviruses that mainly cause respiratory tract infections [2, 3]. The clinical importance and the epidemic possibility of coronaviruses started to be recognized in 2002 when the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-1) epidemic occurred, with 66% of the cases detected in China [4]. Subsequently, this was followed by the middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus MERS-CoV infection in 2012, with more than 80% of the cases detected in Saudi Arabia [5, 6].

Although suggested, it is still unclear whether coronaviruses have cross-reactive immunity between different types [7,8,9]. A growing body of evidence indicates that coronavirus infection triggers both humoral and cellular immunities essential to eliminate the viral infection [10, 11]. Sero-prevalence studies showed that the detection of antibodies against coronaviruses starts early during the disease, after 11 days in SARS-CoV-2, 16 days in MERS-CoV, and 12 days in SARS-CoV-1 [9, 10, 12]. SARS-CoV-2 specific antibody levels declined to undetectable levels after two to three months in 40% of asymptomatic and 13% of symptomatic individuals [13]. This decline of antibody levels is much quicker than in MERS-CoV infection, where the specific antibody responses can persist for 2–6 years in patients who survived a severe form of the disease and to a shorter duration in patients with a subclinical or mild form of MERS-CoV disease [14,15,16]. However, it is strongly believed that cellular immunity is essential for long-term immunity in both SARS-CoV-2 [17] and MERS-CoV [18].

The general similarity of the immune responses against different coronaviruses may suggest the presence of some degree of cross-immunity, with exposure to one virus may confer partial immunity to another [8, 11]. Even at the level of testing, there has been some degree of cross-reactivity between different coronaviruses [8, 9]. This study aimed to determine whether previous MERS-CoV infection was associated with a lower risk of subsequent COVID-19 disease and COVID-19-related outcomes, including disease severity and hospitalization.

Methods

Study design

A retrospective cohort study was carried out among all patients screened for MERS-CoV at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh (KAMC-R) in Saudi Arabia between September 2012 and March 2020. Both MERS-CoV positive and negative cohorts were followed up through September 2021 for the development of COVID-19 infection. The study obtained all required ethical approvals.

Setting

The study was conducted at KAMC-R, Saudi Arabia. KAMC-R is an approximately 1488-bed tertiary care facility composed of two hospitals. KAMC-R provides healthcare services for almost 1.15 million eligible Saudi National Guard soldiers, employees, and their families. The Medical City is Joint Commission International (JCI) accredited facility.

Case finding

Per the Saudi Ministry of Health (MOH) regulations, the basic information of all PCR-confirmed MERS-CoV patients is reported electronically through the Saudi Health Electronic Surveillance Network (HESN). The HESN reporting system is an integrated national electronic surveillance system governed by MOH in Saudi Arabia. HESN has several domains to uniformly monitor infectious diseases, disease epidemics, immunization, and Hospital Acquired Infections across Saudi Arabia [19]. Eligibility criteria were verified by utilizing both HESN basic information and local infection control data at KAMC-R.

Study population

All patients screened for MERS-CoV between September 2012 and March 2020, irrespective of their test results, age, gender, nationality, and employment status (healthcare versus non-healthcare provider), were identified. Patients who died after MERS-CoV testing and before March 2020 and those who had less than three months between MERS-CoV testing and COVID-19 assessment were excluded. Additionally, those who were missing testing results of either MERS-CoV or COVID-19 were excluded from this study.

Sample size and sampling

According to WHO reports, 1333 patients with MERS-CoV in Saudi Arabia survived the disease by May 2020 [6], and less than 10% were diagnosed in KAMC-R. Given the presence of a small population of patients with positive MERS-CoV at KAMC-R (N = 100), it was estimated that 90 patients would be required to detect 10% (± 2.0%) of COVID-19 infection. Additionally, 270 individuals with negative MERS-CoV (in a ratio of 3:1) were recruited as a comparison group, to adjust for the small number of patients with positive MERS-CoV. Therefore, the total sample size was 360 patients (90 positive and 270 negative MERS-CoV). The negative cohort was group-matched with the positive cohort as regards the year of testing, age (within five years), and gender. Given the limited number of survived MERS-CoV patients who have COVID-19 status in our center, all eligible patients were included in the study and no special sampling was done.

Data collection tool

Detailed information on both cohorts was collected using a standardized data collection form. These included demographic characteristics, working status (health care workers versus patients), and disease severity during MERS-CoV assessment. Additionally, medical comorbidities and COVID-19 status and severity at the end of the follow-up duration.

Exposure and outcome definitions

Laboratory-confirmed MERS-CoV patients (exposure groups) and Laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients (outcome groups) were determined using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing. Other outcomes were investigated, including COVID-19 severity, complications, mortality, hospital/ICU admission, use and duration of Ventilation, and hospital/ICU length of stay. The severity of MERS-CoV disease was categorized as asymptomatic, mild/moderate (home isolation vs. hospital ward admission), and severe (required ICU admission). The severity of COVID-19 disease was categorized as asymptomatic, mild (symptomatic without evidence of pneumonia or hypoxia), moderate (clinical signs of pneumonia but no hypoxia), severe (severe pneumonia or hypoxia), and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were expressed as mean and standard deviation (SD) or median with appropriate interquartile ranges (IQRs), whereas categorical variables were expressed as numbers and percentages. Additionally, the incidence of the study outcomes per 1000 patient years was calculated. The study outcomes were compared between patients with positive versus negative MERS-CoV and patients with symptomatic versus negative or asymptomatic MERS-CoV infection. Significant differences between groups were examined using Chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests as appropriate for categorical variables, t-test or Mann-Whitney test as appropriate for continuous variables, and Z-test for incidence. Crude and adjusted (multivariate) Cox regression models predicting the study outcomes at the end of the follow-up period by baseline MERS-CoV status were run to estimate the hazard ratio (HRs) and COVID-19-free survival. Multivariate models were adjusted for age at COVID, gender, and significant comorbidity (hypertension, diabetes, heart diseases, lung diseases, and renal disease/hemodialysis). P-values < 0.05 were considered significant. SPSS (Version 27.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp) was used for all statistical analyses.

Results

Out of 418 patients, 21 (5.0%) patients were excluded for either short (< 3 months) follow-up duration (N = 9, 2.2%) or lack of information about MERS-CoV proof (N = 5, 1.2%) or COVID-19 proof (N = 7, 1.7%). A total of 397 were included in the current analysis, and they were followed for an average 15 months during COVID-19 pandemic, which was on average 4.9 years from the MERS-CoV infection. Out of the included patients, 93 (23.4%) had positive MERS-CoV PCR tests, 61 (15.4%) had symptomatic MERS-CoV infection, and 48 (12.1%) had positive COVID-19 PCR tests (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Diagram of developing COVID-19 infection by MERS-CoV status

Full size image

Description of the population at baseline

As shown in Table 1, the mean age was 46.4 ± 19.3 years. Approximately 54.8% were females, 62.8% were Saudi, and 40.6% were healthcare workers. The main presentations were respiratory symptoms (37.3%) and fever (23.9%), while almost half (51.6%) of patients were asymptomatic. Approximately 8.8% required ICU admission, and 2.8% required Mechanical Ventilation. MERS-CoV was significantly associated with non-Saudi patients, healthcare workers, having respiratory symptoms or fever, having severe disease, and requiring ICU admission or Mechanical Ventilation.

Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population at baseline by MERS-CoV status
Full size table

Description of patients with COVID-19

As shown in Table 2, the mean age was 51.2 ± 19.7 years. Approximately 54.2% were females, 70.8% were Saudi, and 31.3% were healthcare workers. The main presentations were respiratory symptoms (66.7%), and fever (33.3%), with the majority (77.1%) of patients having mild/moderate disease (no hypoxia). The main complications were an acute respiratory failure (8.3%) and septic shock (6.3%). The main comorbidity included hypertension (35.4%), diabetes (29.2%), heart diseases (14.6%), lung diseases (14.6%), and renal disease, including hemodialysis (14.6%). Approximately 27.1% required hospital admission, 8.3% needed ICU admission, and 4.2% required Mechanical Ventilation. Diagnosing COVID-19 was significantly associated with developing respiratory symptoms, fever, constitutional symptoms, severe disease, acute respiratory failure, or septic shock, and requiring hospital or ICU admission.

Table 2 Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population at the end of follow up by COVID-19 status
Full size table

Crude outcomes

By the end of follow-up, the incidences per 1000 person-years of COVID-19 infection (20.1 versus 28.7), hospital admission (14.1 versus 18.9), and ICU admission (2.0 versus 6.0) were lower in patients with positive MERS-CoV compared with those with negative MERS-CoV, but without reaching statistical significance (Fig. 2). The risk of COVID-19 disease was reduced but still insignificant when comparing patients with symptomatic MERS-CoV versus those with negative or asymptomatic MERS-CoV. Table 3 shows detailed outcomes, including COVID-19 infection, disease severity, complications, mortality, hospital/ICU admission, use and duration of Mechanical Ventilation, and hospital/ICU length of stay. All outcomes were better in patients with positive or symptomatic MERS-CoV infection but without reaching statistical significance. For example, COVID-19 infection (6.6% versus 13.1%, p = 0.150), severe disease (1.6% versus 3.0%, p = 0.584), and mortality (1.6% versus 3.3%, p = 0.701) were lower in patients with symptomatic MERS-CoV versus those with negative or asymptomatic MERS-CoV. On the other hand, the follow-up time in patients with symptomatic MERS-CoV was significantly longer (5.5 versus 4.9 years, p = 0.002). There was no association between COVID-19 infection by followed up time, irrespective of MERS-CoV status.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Incidence of the study outcomes per 1000 patient years at the end of follow up period by baseline MERS-CoV status

Full size image
Table 3 Study outcomes at the end of follow up period by baseline MERS-CoV status
Full size table

Adjusted outcomes

As shown in Table 4, Cox regression analysis adjusted for the follow-up time in addition to age, gender, and major comorbidity at COVID assessment showed a marginally significant lower risk of COVID-19 infection (hazard ratio = 0.533, p = 0.085) and hospital admission (hazard ratio = 0.411, p = 0.061) in patients with positive MERS-CoV. Interestingly, the risk of COVID-19 disease was further reduced and became significant in patients with symptomatic MERS-CoV, COVID-19 infection (hazard ratio = 0.324, p = 0.034), and hospital admission (hazard ratio = 0.317, p = 0.042). Similarly, COVID-19-free survival at the end of the follow-up period was better in patients with positive MERS-CoV (p = 0.085) and those with symptomatic MERS-CoV (p = 0.034) (Fig. 3).

Table 4 Crude (unadjusted) and adjusted Cox regression models predicting the study outcomes at the end of follow up period by baseline MERS-CoV status
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

Adjusted Cox regression analysis of COVID-19 free survival at the end of follow up period by baseline MERS-CoV status*Adjusted for age at COVID, gender, and major comorbidity (hypertension, diabetes, heart diseases, lung diseases, and renal disease/hemodialysis)

Full size image

Discussion

The current study examined the risk of COVID-19 infection and its related outcomes among patients who survived MERS-CoV infection before the COVID-19 pandemic. There was a generally lower risk of COVID-19 disease and related hospitalization in patients with symptomatic MERS-CoV rather than just positive MERS-CoV, irrespective of symptoms. However, the risk only reached statistical significance in models adjusted for the follow-up time, age, gender, and significant comorbidity. Comparing the current finding is challenging due to scarce data testing MERS-CoV and COVID-19 cross-protection. We were able to identify only one similar study [7]. A retrospective cohort study in Saudi Arabia in 2020 showed a lower incidence of COVID-19 infection in patients with positive compared with negative MERS-CoV (24% versus 31%, p = 0.014) [7]. However, patients with positive MERS-CoV in that study had higher hospitalization and case fatality [7]. The later contradictory crude finding was probably caused by the fact that the positive MERS-CoV group in that study was significantly older and had a higher morbidity profile than the negative MERS-CoV group. This was further proven by eliminating the significance of case fatality by adjusting for age. Additionally, the authors did present a complete adjusted analysis for different study outcomes.

Consistent with current findings, a serological study in Sierra Leone showed significantly lower MERS-CoV antibodies among patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection compared with survivors of Lassa fever and Ebola and their contacts who did not have COVID-19 disease [20]. Additionally, some studies suggested the presence of cross-protection against COVID-19 infection in patients with previous seasonal coronaviruses [21]. A retrospective analysis of an extensive insurance database showed that adults with a possible coronaviruses-caused common cold as manifested by acute sinusitis, bronchitis, or pharyngitis during the last year had a lower risk of confirmed COVID-19 infection [21]. A significant limitation of that study was the lack of serological confirmation of previous coronavirus infection, which usually accounts for only 10–30% of common cold-related diagnoses.

The current finding confirms that symptomatic MERS-CoV infection protects more against COVID-19 than asymptomatic or negative MERS-CoV. This may be explained by the fact that severe MERS-CoV is associated with humoral and cellular immune responses that persist longer than subclinical or mild disease [15, 16]. Additionally, severe MERS-CoV disease is associated with a more robust immune response, including specific antibodies and memory CD4 T cells [15, 22, 23]. The more robust immune response in patients with severe MERS-CoV disease has been observed 6 to 24 months after infection in both Saudi Arabia [15] and South Korea [22]. On the other hand, the majority of patient with mild disease had undetectable antibody titre [22]. Unlike COVID-19, neutralization antibodies in patients with MERS-CoV are detectable up to 6 years after diagnosis [16]. Finally, cellular immunity including T cells, is essential for long-term immunity in both MERS-CoV AND COVID-19 [17, 18]. These immunologic findings may point to the possible cross-immunity against COVID-19 infection and severe outcomes among MERS-CoV survivals. Nevertheless, the lack of significant differences in ICU admission and mortality between the study groups of the current study may be related to their very low incidence (2.3% and 2.8%, respectively) compared with infection (12.1%).

The current study is considered the first to estimate the impact of previous MERS-CoV infection on the risk of COVID-19 disease and its related outcomes in a cohort design using adjusted analysis. Baseline cohorts were group-matched on age, gender, and year of testing. Both MERS-CoV and COVID-19 infection statuses were confirmed using PCR testing. The healthcare system where the data were collected has a unique experience with MERS-CoV [24, 25]. Nevertheless, the retrospective design may have introduced bias to the collected data. The single-center experience may limit the generalizability of the study findings, and the lack of serologic data may undermine the underlying mechanism of suggested protection. Healthcare workers who represented about 40% of the sample may have more screening opportunities than patients. The impact of over-screening is probably insignificant because it was similarly observed in MERS-CoV outbreak and COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, the further analysis of the data by symptomatic status should eliminate most of such difference, as negative and asymptomatic patients were grouped as one group. The current data is considered unique and considerably contributes to our understanding regarding the cross-protection between coronaviruses.

In conclusion, patients with symptomatic MERS-CoV have a lower risk of COVID-19 infection and related hospitalization, especially after adjusting for demographic and comorbidity profiles. The current findings may indicate a partial cross-immunity between MERS-CoV and COVID-19 infection. These findings probably justify a national multicentre study using immunity markers to confirm cross-immunity and elaborate more on its mechanisms.

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from King Abdul Aziz Medical city. Restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for this study. Data are available from the corresponding authors with the permission of King Abdul Aziz Medical city and Institutional Review Board of King Abdullah International Medical Research Center.

Abbreviations

MERS-CoV:

Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus

KAMC-R:

King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh

MOH:

Ministry of Health

HESN:

Health Electronic Surveillance Network

References

  1. Filip R, Gheorghita Puscaselu R, Anchidin-Norocel L, Dimian M, Savage WK. Global Challenges To Public Health Care Systems during the COVID-19 pandemic: a review of pandemic measures and problems. J Pers Med 2022, 12(8).

  2. Ashour HM, Elkhatib WF, Rahman MM, Elshabrawy HA. Insights into the recent 2019 Novel Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) in light of Past Human Coronavirus outbreaks. Pathogens. 2020;9(3):186.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. V’Kovski P, Kratzel A, Steiner S, Stalder H, Thiel V. Coronavirus biology and replication: implications for SARS-CoV-2. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021;19(3):155–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cherry JD. The chronology of the 2002–2003 SARS mini pandemic. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2004;5(4):262–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Omrani AS, Shalhoub S. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV): what lessons can we learn? J Hosp Infect. 2015;91(3):188–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. World Health Organization-Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMRO). : Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), 5 August 2022 Update. URL: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/middle-east-respiratory-syndrome-coronavirus-(mers-cov) (Last accessed January 10, 2023). 2020.

  7. Khan AA, Alahmari AA, Almuzaini Y, Alamri F, Alsofayan YM, Aburas A, Al-Muhsen S, Van Kerkhove M, Yezli S, Ciottone GR, et al. Potential cross-reactive immunity to COVID-19 Infection in individuals with Laboratory-confirmed MERS-CoV Infection: a National Retrospective Cohort Study from Saudi Arabia. Front Immunol. 2021;12:727989.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Yaqinuddin A. Cross-immunity between respiratory coronaviruses may limit COVID-19 fatalities. Med Hypotheses. 2020;144:110049–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang AT, Garcia-Carreras B, Hitchings MDT, Yang B, Katzelnick LC, Rattigan SM, Borgert BA, Moreno CA, Solomon BD, Rodriguez-Barraquer I et al. A systematic review of antibody mediated immunity to coronaviruses: antibody kinetics, correlates of protection, and association of antibody responses with severity of disease. medRxiv 2020.

  10. Zhang YY, Li BR, Ning BT. The comparative immunological characteristics of SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus Infections. Front Immunol. 2020;11:2033.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Sinderewicz E, Czelejewska W, Jezierska-Wozniak K, Staszkiewicz-Chodor J, Maksymowicz W. Immune Response to COVID-19: can we benefit from the SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV Pandemic Experience? Pathogens 2020, 9(9).

  12. Sariol A, Perlman S. Lessons for COVID-19 Immunity from Other Coronavirus Infections. Immunity 2020.

  13. Long Q-X, Tang X-J, Shi Q-L, Li Q, Deng H-J, Yuan J, Hu J-L, Xu W, Zhang Y, Lv F-J et al. Clinical and immunological assessment of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infections. Nat Med 2020.

  14. Drosten C, Meyer B, Müller MA, Corman VM, Al-Masri M, Hossain R, Madani H, Sieberg A, Bosch BJ, Lattwein E, et al. Transmission of MERS-Coronavirus in Household contacts. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(9):828–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhao J, Alshukairi AN, Baharoon SA, Ahmed WA, Bokhari AA, Nehdi AM, Layqah LA, Alghamdi MG, Al Gethamy MM, Dada AM et al. Recovery from the Middle East respiratory syndrome is associated with antibody and T-cell responses. Sci Immunol 2017, 2(14).

  16. Alshukairi AN, Zhao J, Al-Mozaini MA, Wang Y, Dada A, Baharoon SA, Alfaraj S, Ahmed WA, Enani MA, Elzein FE, et al. Longevity of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus antibody responses in humans, Saudi Arabia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2021;27(5):1472–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Moga E, Lynton-Pons E, Domingo P. The robustness of Cellular Immunity determines the fate of SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Front Immunol. 2022;13:904686.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu WJ, Zhao M, Liu K, Xu K, Wong G, Tan W, Gao GF. T-cell immunity of SARS-CoV: implications for vaccine development against MERS-CoV. Antiviral Res. 2017;137:82–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Saudi Ministry of Health (MOH). : Health Electronic Surveillance Network. URL: https://hesn.moh.gov.sa/webportal/ (Last accessed September 1, 2020). 2020.

  20. Borrega R, Nelson DKS, Koval AP, Bond NG, Heinrich ML, Rowland MM, Lathigra R, Bush DJ, Aimukanova I, Phinney WN et al. Cross-reactive antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV in Pre-COVID-19 blood samples from Sierra Leoneans. Viruses 2021, 13(11).

  21. Aran D, Beachler DC, Lanes S, Overhage JM. Prior presumed coronavirus Infection reduces COVID-19 risk: a cohort study. J Infect. 2020;81(6):923–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Choe PG, Perera R, Park WB, Song KH, Bang JH, Kim ES, Kim HB, Ko LWR, Park SW, Kim NJ, et al. MERS-CoV antibody responses 1 year after Symptom Onset, South Korea, 2015. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23(7):1079–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Corman VM, Albarrak AM, Omrani AS, Albarrak MM, Farah ME, Almasri M, Muth D, Sieberg A, Meyer B, Assiri AM, et al. Viral shedding and antibody response in 37 patients with Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus Infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62(4):477–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Balkhy HH, Alenazi TH, Alshamrani MM, Baffoe-Bonnie H, Arabi Y, Hijazi R, Al-Abdely HM, El-Saed A, Al Johani S, Assiri AM, et al. Description of a hospital outbreak of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome in a large Tertiary Care Hospital in Saudi Arabia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016;37(10):1147–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Alenazi TH, Al Arbash H, El-Saed A, Alshamrani MM, Baffoe-Bonnie H, Arabi YM, Al Johani SM, Hijazi R, Alothman A, Balkhy HH. Identified Transmission Dynamics of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus Infection during an outbreak: implications of an overcrowded Emergency Department. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65(4):675–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the effort of the team at Infection Prevention and Control Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City.

Funding

The authors received no financial support related to this research.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Aiman El-Saed

    Present address: King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Infection Prevention and Control Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    Aiman El-Saed, Henry Baffoe-Bonnie, Rawabi Almulhem, Muayed Matalqah & Majid M. Alshamrani

  2. King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    Aiman El-Saed & Majid M. Alshamrani

  3. King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    Fatmah Othman & Majid M. Alshamrani

  4. Epidemiology and Biostatistics Department, College of Public Health and Health Informatics, King Saud bin Abdul Aziz University for Health Science, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    Fatmah Othman

  5. Infection Prevention and Control Department, King Abdullah Specialist Children Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    Latifah Alshammari

Authors
  1. Aiman El-Saed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fatmah Othman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Henry Baffoe-Bonnie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rawabi Almulhem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Muayed Matalqah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Latifah Alshammari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Majid M. Alshamrani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MA and AE conceived of and planned the analysis. AE, MA, HB, MM, LA and FO were involved in the study design, analysis plan, and data collection. AE and FO analyzed the data. MA, HB, MM, LA and RA provided comments and discussions on the analytical methods. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript initially and after the modification.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Majid M. Alshamrani.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study obtained all required ethical licenses from the Institutional Review Board of King Abdullah International Medical Research Center at King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for health Science, protocol number (RC20-527-R). Waiver of informed consent was obtained through the Institutional Review Board of King Abdullah International Medical Research Center due to the nature of this retrospective study and to preserve anonymity of patients. The authors confirms that all methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All authors have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

El-Saed, A., Othman, F., Baffoe-Bonnie, H. et al. Symptomatic MERS-CoV infection reduces the risk of future COVID-19 disease; a retrospective cohort study. BMC Infect Dis 23, 757 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08763-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08763-2

Keywords

BMC Infectious Diseases

ISSN: 1471-2334

Contact us