Skip to main content
Download PDF

High incidence of fosfomycin-resistant uropathogenic E. coli among children

BMC Infectious Diseases volume 23, Article number: 475 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

There are few epidemiological or molecular data on Escherichia coli (E. coli) strains resistant to fosfomycin. In this study, we described the occurrence and characterization of fosfomycin-resistant uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) isolated from children.

Materials and methods

This study was carried out on 96 E. coli isolates obtained from children with urinary tract infections. Two methods were performed to detect fosfomycin resistance: The agar dilution method and the rapid fosfomycin test. The disc diffusion method was done to detect the antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of all isolates. The phylogenetic grouping of all isolates was done according to the modified Clermont method. Conventional PCR was performed to detect plasmid-mediated fosfomycin-resistant genes (fos genes) and the blaCTX−M gene.

Results

Analyses of data were performed by SPSS software. A high percentage of fosfomycin resistance (37/96; 38.5%) was reported among UPEC isolates. The fosfomycin-resistant strains showed a higher resistance rate than fosfomycin-susceptible isolates to different antibiotics. E group (62.2%) was the most predominant phylogenetic group among the fosfomycin-resistant UPEC isolates, followed by Group B2 (21.6%) and group D (13.5%). The fos genes were detected in 21 isolates with the fosA3 gene as the most frequent, which was detected in 11 isolates followed by fosA (8), fosC2 (4), fosA4(1), and fosA5(1) genes.

Conclusion

This is the first report of a high prevalence of plasmid-mediated fosfomycin-resistant UPEC in Egypt. All of these isolates were multidrug-resistant to the tested antibiotics. Close monitoring of such strains is mandatory to prevent widespread dissemination of the genes code for antibiotic resistance.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) is the most common bacterial infection between children with E. coli is the most common cause. It was reported that 8% of girls and 2% of boys are affected by UTI at the age of 7 years [1]. Early diagnosis and treatment of UTI is important as there is increased risk of renal disease in children below the age of 5 years which result of morbidity. Uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) with different phylogenetic characteristics and virulence profiles are multiple drug resistant (MDR) isolates which make them a serious, challenging health problem including those producing extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) and/or carbapenemases, resulting in major limitations on the therapeutic options available to treat urinary tract infections (UTIs) [2, 3]. Fosfomycin is an old antibiotic that has reemerged to overcome antibiotic resistance and is also commonly used as a first-line oral agent for uncomplicated UTI [4]. Recently a review of fosfomycin use in children recommends it for the treatment of UTI and osteomyelitis, especially for multidrug-resistant bacteria [5]. Fosfomycin prevents the initial step of peptidoglycan synthesis through the inactivation of N-acetyl glucosamine transferase (MurA), which prevents the formation of N-acetylmuramic acid from N-acetylglucosamine and phosphoenol pyruvate. Fosfomycin crosses the bacterial cell wall using two transport systems; glycerol phosphate (GlpT) and hexose phosphate (UhpT). Fosfomycin resistance can result from mutations in the chromosomal glpT and uhpT genes or amino acid mutations in the active site of the MurA target. The production of plasmid-encoded fosfomycin-inactivating enzymes (fos genes) is another important mechanism for fosfomycin resistance. Different fosfomycin-modifying enzymes have been described: FosA, FosB, FosC, and FosX, encoded by the fos gene, which inactivates fosfomycin by cleaving the oxirane ring. FosA enzymes are the most frequently reported fosfomycin-modifying enzymes and are common in Enterobacteriaceae. The FosA3 enzyme is the most commonly identified FosA determinant in E. coli [6]. Other fos genes, such as fosA4, fosA5, and fosA6 have also been less frequently identified in E. coli [7]. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the prevalence of fosfomycin-resistant E. coli isolated from children with UTIs in general, then to determine the distribution of the fos genes in these isolates. To the best of our knowledge, there are few epidemiological and molecular data regarding the phylogenetic grouping of fosfomycin-resistant E. coli [8, 9]. Accordingly, we aimed to evaluate the frequency of fosfomycin resistance and phylo-group fosfomycin-resistant and fosfomycin-susceptible isolates.

Patients and methods

In this cross sectional descriptive study which has been done during the period from October 2021 till March 2022, all children aged from 2–16 years old complaining of UTI manifestations were selected from outpatient clinic - Minia university hospital. Exclusion criteria include: A child with a catheter associated UTI, A child diagnosed with congenital anomalies, Previous surgery of the genitourinary tract (except circumcision in male children), A child has history of chronic renal diseases or found an immune compromising agents as HIV, malignancy and chronic use of corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive drugs. All the included children in the study were exposed to the following: detailed history taking with special focus on the presence of urological manifestations (dysuria, loin pain, frequency, supra-pubic pain, change of the color of urine, enuresis), treatment with certain drugs for long period, past history of renal diseases or family history of renal diseases and full clinical examination.

The number of patients required in this study was estimated using the following equation[10]:

$$Z_{1 - \alpha /2}^2P(1 - P)/{d^2}$$
(1)

Z1−α/2 = is standard normal variate (at 5% type 1 error (P < 0.05) it is 1.96.

P = Expected proportion in population. d = Absolute error or precision.

Isolation of E. coli from urine samples

A total of 241 midstream urine samples were collected from children (2–16 years old) attending the Pediatric outpatient clinics of Minia University hospital. Urine samples were transported to the laboratory for processing within 2 h of collection. Positive cultures were identified by detection of ≥ 105 CFU/ml. E. coli identification was done by inoculation of urine samples into MacConkey and Eosin Methylene Blue agar (Oxoid, UK). Further identification was done by Gram staining and biochemical reactions of the suspected colonies [10].

Phenotypic detection of fosfomycin-resistant E. coli strains

Agar dilution method

According to CLSI guidelines, the only approved method for testing fosfomycin MIC is agar dilution using agar media supplemented with 25 µg/mL of glucose-6-phosphate [11]. Commercial fosfomycin powder (Zambon, S.P.A), glucose-6-p powder (Oxoid, England), and Muller Hinton agar (Oxoid, England) were used. Briefly bacterial suspension of 0.5McFarland turbidity was prepared. Fosfomycin powder was diluted to obtain concentrations ranging from 2 to 1024 µg/ml. Mueller Hinton agar supplemented with 25 µg/mL of glucose-6-phosphate was dissolved in distilled water and then autoclaved. One part of the antimicrobial solution to nine parts of molten agar in every petri dish was added. Two µl of each isolate was spotted off the agar starting from the lowest antibiotic concentration. Two plates were prepared, one containing bacterial suspension with no antimicrobial solution as a growth control and the other containing plain media only as purity plates. The plates were inverted and incubated for 24 h at 37 ºC. Then MICs were recorded as the lowest concentration shows no visible growth on the inoculum spot.

Rapid fosfomycin NP test

The rapid fosfomycin NP test was developed to detect fosfomycin resistance in E. coli isolates and its results are obtained in 1 h 30 min. The test is based on glucose utilization and the detection of bacterial growth in the presence of fosfomycin. Bacterial growth is visually detected by an orange-to-yellow color change of red phenol, a pH indicator. The rapid fosfomycin NP test was done according to Nordmann’s instructions as follows: Briefly, the rapid fosfomycin NP solution was prepared by mixing the culture medium, glucose, pH indicator, and distilled water. In a 96-well polystyrene micro test plate 50 µl of bacterial suspension (3 McFakrland standard) was added to two wells, the first containing 150 µl of rapid fosfomycin NP solution without Fosfomycin (Positive control), and the second containing 150 µl of rapid fosfomycin NP solution supplemented with 25 µg/ml glucose-6-phosphate and 40 µg/ml fosfomycin. The same procedure was performed using 50 µl Sodium Chloride instead of the bacterial suspension, as negative controls. The plate was incubated at 37 ºC in an aerobic incubator and the micro-test plates were visually inspected every 30 min [12].

Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of E. coli isolates

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for all E. coli isolates to the following antibiotics: Cefazolin, Ampicillin-Sulbactam, Cefoxitin, Ceftazidime, Levofloxacin, Nitrofurantoin, Tetracycline, and Meropenem were determined by the disk diffusion method according to the instructions of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [11].

Phenotypic detection of plasmid-mediated fosfomycin-resistant E. coli by phosphonoformate test

Plasmid-encoded fosfomycin-inactivating enzymes (Fos enzymes) were detected by a modified Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion test. In brief, a Mueller-Hinton agar plate was inoculated with a 0.5 McFarland suspension of the isolate assayed. Two disks were placed on the agar: a 200-µg fosfomycin disk, and a disk with both 200-µg fosfomycin and 100-µg phosphonoformate. The diameter of the inhibition zone around each disk was measured after 24 h of incubation at 37 °C. The Fos enzyme-mediated fosfomycin resistance is inhibited by phosphonoformate and is demonstrated by an increase in the diameter of the growth inhibition zone by ≥ 5 mm [13].

Molecular characterization

DNA extraction

DNA extraction for all E. coli isolates was done by boiling method as follow: After overnight broth culture for each isolate, 1.5 mL of bacterial broth was loaded into sterile microtubes. The tubes were centrifuged at 5,000 × g for 3 min by microtubes centrifuge (Hamburg, Germany). The supernatant was eliminated, and the pellet was suspended in 200 µl molecular biology-grade water and mixed by pipetting. The tubes were subjected to boiling at 100 °C in a water bath for 14 min then; sudden cooling in ice for 20 min, followed by centrifugation for 3 min at 5,000 × g. The supernatant containing DNA was transferred to a newly labeled tube for PCR study.

Phylogenetic grouping of E. coli isolates

Phylogenetic grouping was done according to the new Clermont method [14]: A multiplex PCR was used to group the E. coli isolates based on the presence or absence of 4 genes: arpA, chuA, yjaA, and TspE4. This method was used to classify E. coli isolates into 8 phylogroups (A, B1, B2, C, D, E, F, and cryptic clade). Multiplex PCR was carried out in a 25 µL reaction mixture, including 10 µl of hot start 2x Taq DNA Polymerase Master Mix (Bioline, USA), 5 µL nuclease-free water, 1 µL (10 µM), each primer, and 2 µL (100 ng/µl), template DNA. Amplification was carried out as follows: initial denaturation at 94 C° (10 min), 30 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C (30 s), annealing at 59 °C (30 s), and elongation at 72 °C (60 s), followed by a final extension at 72 °C (5 min). The PCR products were analyzed by running the PCR product through 1% agarose in TBE buffer at 90 V and visualization under UV trans-illumination.

Detection of fos genes and bla CTX-M gene

Conventional PCR was performed to detect fos genes and CTX-M gene in Fosfomycin-resistant isolates using primers and conditions listed in Table 1 [13, 15,16,17,18]. The amplification reactions were carried out in 25 µl volumes containing 12.5 µl of PCR master mix (Bioline, USA Inc.), 1 µl of each primer (10 pmol/µl), 8.5µL nuclease-free water, and 2 µl of 100 ng/µl template DNA.

Table 1 PCR Primers and conditions of the studied genes
Full size table

Statistical analysis

Analyses of data were performed by SPSS software version 23 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Categorical data are presented as number and percentage. The Chi-square test was used to determine the significant differences. The odds ratios and corresponding p-values for the samples were analyzed by logistic regression analysis. A two-tailed p-value of ˂ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Clinical characteristics of children with UTI

A total of 241 children with UTI between 2 and 16 years were identified. Of these, 126 (52.2%) patients had a first episode of UTI and 115 (47.7%) had recurrent UTI. The median age at presentation was 6 years old, females were predominant (N = 151, 62.7%). Other risk factors such as, history of prolonged antibiotics administration (N = 190, 78.8%), Family history of UTI (N = 174, 72.2%) and enuresis (N = 153, 63.5%) were predominant among children with UTI.

Isolation of E. coli from urine samples

Out of 241 urine samples obtained from children suffering from UTIs, 170 isolates were confirmed as positive cultures. 96 of these cultures were confirmed to be E. coli (56.5%).

Phenotypic detection of fosfomycin-resistant E. coli strains

Two methods were performed to detect fosfomycin resistance: The agar dilution method and the rapid fosfomycin test (Supplementary Fig. 1). Out of 96 E. coli isolates, 37 (38.5%) were fosfomycin resistant (MIC ≥ 256 µg/ml) by agar dilution method while, 36 (37.5%) E. coli isolates were reported as fosfomycin resistant by the rapid NP test. There was a good correlation between the agar dilution susceptibility test and the rapid fosfomycin NP test findings (97.3% sensitivity and 100% specificity), both for susceptible and resistant isolates. All but one fosfomycin-resistant isolates detected by agar dilution method converted to yellow color (resistant) by the rapid fosfomycin NP test.

Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of E. coli isolates

The antimicrobial resistance rates stratified by fosfomycin resistance or susceptibility categories are summarized in Table 2. The fosfomycin-resistant strains studied in this work showed a higher resistance rate than fosfomycin-susceptible isolates to different antibiotics with significant differences to cefazolin, cefoxitin, ceftazidime (p-value < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis identified history of prolonged antibiotics administration and history of recurrent UTI as independent risk factors for fosfomycin resistance and MDR as shown in Table 3 (OR ˃ 1 and P ˂0.05). Also as will be mentioned below, UPEC phylogenetic group E was found to be an important risk factor for fosfomycin resistance (OR = 5.296, 95% CI: 1.667–10.167, P value = 0.001).

Table 2 Antimicrobial resistance pattern of E. coli isolates stratified by fosfomycin resistance or susceptibility categories
Full size table
Table 3 Logistic regression analysis of risk factors for MDR and fosfomycin resistance in children with UTI;2
Full size table

Phylogrouping of UPEC isolates

A total of 91 of 96 UPEC isolates were assigned to 3 phylogenetic groups (B2, D, and E) using the quadruplex PCR method (Supplementary Fig. 2). The remaining 5 isolates were categorized as an unknown group. Group B2 was the predominant phylogenetic group in the fosfomycin-susceptible isolates, 32/59 (54.2%). On the other hand, group E was the predominant phylogenetic group in the fosfomycin-resistant isolates, 23/37 (62.2%) (Table 4).

Table 4 The phylogenetic groups of E. coli isolates stratified by fosfomycin resistance or susceptibility categories:
Full size table

Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of plasmid-mediated fosfomycin resistant isolates

Phosphonoformate test was performed to detect plasmid-encoded fosfomycin-inactivating enzymes. Out of 37 fosfomycin resistant, E. coli isolates, 23 (62.2%) were phosphonoformate test positive (Supplementary Fig. 3). The phosphonoformate test positive isolates showed a higher fosfomycin MIC than the phosphonoformate test negative isolates with the median MIC of 1024 µg/ml for the phosphonoformate test positive isolates versus 512 µg/ml for the phosphonoformate test negative isolates (Fig. 1). PCR was performed to detect the plasmid-mediated fosfomycin-resistant genes in the fosfomycin-resistant isolates (Supplementary Fig. 4). The fos genes were detected in 21 isolates with 4 isolates harbor 2 genes of them. All of these isolates were phosphonoformate test positive but 2 phosphonoformate test positive isolates didn’t harbor any of the tested fos genes. Antibiotic-resistant pattern and molecular characterization of the 23 plasmid-mediated fosfomycin-resistant isolates were listed in Table 5. The predominant fosfomycin-resistant gene in this study was fosA3, which was found in 11 isolates (47.8%), followed by fosA, fosC2, fosA4, and fosA5 genes which were detected in 8(34.8%), 4(17.4%), 1(4.3%), and 1(4.3%) of the 23 phosphonoformate test positive isolates, respectively. All but 3 of the 11 fosA3-positive isolates in our study were also CTX-M gene positive. However, the fosA6 and fosB genes weren’t detected in any of the isolates (Table 6).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Fosfomycin MIC of the phosphonoformate test positive and negative isolates: PPF, phosphonoformate test

Full size image
Table 5 Antibiotic resistance pattern and molecular characterization of the plasmid mediated fosfomycin-resistant isolates
Full size table
Table 6 Frequency of the different fos genes and CTX-M gene among fosfomycin resistant E. coli phylogenic groups
Full size table

Discussion

In this study 241 urine samples obtained from children suffering from UTIs, 151(62.7%) samples obtained from females and 90 (37.3) from males.170 samples were confirmed as positive cultures; 96 of these cultures were confirmed to be E. coli. Fosfomycin resistance was reported in 38.5% of E. coli isolates by agar dilution method. Phylogenetic analysis in this study showed that UPEC isolates mainly belong to group B2 followed by group E and D. Previous studies have shown that female gender, history of prolonged antibiotics administration, family history of UTI and enuresis were important risk factors for UTI [19, 20]. Thus, the high frequency of these risk factors in children with UTI found in our study is consistent with these reports. In this study, E. coli was the predominant etiological agent (56.5%) of UTI in children and the distribution of UPEC in the same age group is similar to that previously reported [21, 22].

Fosfomycin was reintroduced as an option for the treatment of UTI in children. There are few epidemiological, clinical or molecular data on E. coli strains resistant to fosfomycin isolated from UTIs. In this study, we investigated the occurrence and molecular features of all fosfomycin-resistant E. coli isolated from children. The strains in our study displayed a high rate of resistance to fosfomycin of about 38.5%, which is higher than that previously reported in Spain, Europe, Asia, United States, South Africa and Pakistan. In Spain certain studies reported that, fosfomycin- resistance among E. coli isolated from urine samples of adult patients were 2.7% and 3.8%, respectively; however, this rate increased to 14.1% and 21.7% when only ESBL-producers were considered [9, 23]. Also, Garcia-Fulgueiras et al. and Rodríguez-Lozano et al. in Spain reported that fosfomycin- resistance among microorganisms that cause urinary tract infections in pediatric patients was 4% and 14.5%, respectively [8, 24]. A total of 1225 ESBL-producing E. coli isolated from different samples and different age groups were investigated for fosfomycin resistance in Switzerland, Europe by Mueller et al. Seventeen isolates turned to be positive according to the results of the agar dilution method and rapid fosfomycin/E. coli NP test [25]. Mosime et al. in South Africa reported that, amongst all the E. coli isolates (n = 138) collected from antenatal clinics, fosfomycin resistance was detected in 2.2% of these isolates [26]. Ali et al. in Pakistan reported 10% resistance to fosfomycin in UPEC isolated from Patients with different age groups[27]. The difference in Fosfomycin resistance rates could be due to different sample size and different geographical distribution.

Following our result, Abu El-Wafa and Abouwarda in Egypt reported 24.1% resistance to fosfomycin in UPEC isolated from Patients with different age groups [28].

Oteo et al. reported that fosfomycin resistance among ESBL-producing E. coli increased from 2.2% to 2003 to 21.7% in 2008 with the increased use of fosfomycin by 50% (23). Moreover, Lee and Le [29] have reported that the increased use of fosfomycin has been associated with increased resistance.

The overall resistance of UPEC isolates to different antibiotics was; Cefazolin (92.7%), Ampicillin-Sulbactam (57.3%), Cefoxitin (63.5%), Ceftazidime (71.8%), Levofloxacin (81.3%), Nitrofurantoin (76%), Tetracycline (82.3%), and Meropenem (39.6%). The high antibiotic resistance rates and MDR pattern (71.8%) of UPEC isolates found in our study is consistent with previous reports from Egypt whether UPEC isolates were collected from children or from different age groups [30,31,32,33]. This may be due to non-indicated, random and excessive use of these antibiotics. Thus the guidelines for antibiotics description must be strictly applied in our country. Also, improving the public knowledge and changing their attitudes towards antibiotic use will be a crucial strategy to maintain antibiotic effectiveness.

Most of the fosfomycin-resistant strains studied in this work showed a high resistant rate to different antibiotics and 85.7% of these isolates were MDR. The resistance rates for cefazolin, cefoxitin, and ceftazidime were significantly higher in fosfomycin-resistant isolates than in fosfomycin-susceptible isolates (P-value < 0.05). Loras et al. and Ya Li et al. also reported that antimicrobial resistance to different antibiotics was significantly higher in fosfomycin-resistant isolates than in fosfomycin-susceptible isolates [9, 34].

In this study, history of prolonged antibiotics administration and history of recurrent UTI were reported as important risk factors for fosfomycin resistance and MDR. Thus, these data suggest certain possible points of intervention to overcome antibiotic resistance such as: restricted administration of antibiotics, optimize antibiotic use among children with recurrent UTI, empirical antibiotics administration for treatment of UTI among children with previous prolonged antibiotic use.

In fosfomycin-resistant strains, phosphonoformate test and PCR for fos genes were performed to detect plasmid-mediated fosfomycin-resistant isolates, followed by classification by phylogenetic grouping. To the best of our knowledge, the present work is the first investigation of the prevalence and phylogenetic grouping of fosfomycin-resistant UPEC in Egypt.

In this study and according to the new Clermont phylotyping method, group B2 (41.7%) was the predominant group among UPEC isolates, followed by E (33.3%) and D (19.8%) groups. Our findings are in accordance with other studies in Egypt [30, 35] and worldwide [2, 36,37,38] where it was found that virulent extra intestinal E. coli strains belonged typically to group B2 followed by group D or E. Most of our fosfomycin-resistant UPEC strains belonged to phylogenetic group E, 23/37 (62.2%) followed by B2 (21.6%) and D (13.5%) groups. On the other hand, Group B2 was the predominant phylogenetic group in the fosfomycin-susceptible isolates, 32/59 (54.2%). This indicates that group E may contribute more to fosfomycin resistance than other phylogroups. Another study carried by Loras et al. in Spain reported that; most of the fosfomycin resistant UPEC belonged to phylogenetic group B2 (23/39; 59%), followed by: E (7/39; 18%), A (5/39; 13%), B1 (2/ 39; 5%) and C (2/39; 5%) groups [9]. This difference may be due to different strains, sample sizes, and geographical distribution.

The phylogroup E strains possess 4331 to 5440 genes with a core genome of 2771 genes and a pangenome of 33 722 genes. The distribution of these genes among the strains shows an asymmetric U-shaped distribution. E phylogenetic strains have the largest genomes of the species, partly explained by the presence of mobile genetic elements. Sixty-eight lineages were delineated, some of them exhibiting extra-intestinal virulence genes and being virulent in the mouse sepsis model. Some diarrheogenic E. coli strains are found in this phylogroup and except for the EHEC lineages and the reference EPEC, EIEC and ETEC strains, very few strains possess intestinal virulence genes [39].

Out of 37 fosfomycin-resistant E. coli isolates, 23 (62.2%) were phosphonoformate test positive, and the tested fos genes were detected in 21 isolates of them. The predominant fos gene in this study was fosA3, which was found in 11 isolates. It has been previously reported that fosA3 is the most prevalent plasmid-mediated fosfomycin-resistant gene in E. coli isolates, which is usually located in conjugative plasmids also carrying CTX-M-type ESBL-encoding genes [40,41,42][40, 41 and 42]. Thus, the high prevalence of fosA3 gene found in our study is consistent with these reports. Moreover, all but 3 of the 11 fosA3-positive isolates in our study were also positive for CTX-M gene, confirming the high degree of association between the two resistance determinants. The small fosfomycin resistant sample set complicated the interpretation of our results. Furthermore, we could only base our findings on the selected resistance genes investigated in this study. Although the study tested only 96 UPEC isolates and all the isolates were from the same region, the study provided some indication of the fosfomycin resistance patterns and genes among UPEC phylogenetic groups in our locality. Further studies on UPEC phylogenetic groups and fosfomycin resistance patterns with large sample size from different regions are recommended to understand the characterization and the epidemiology of this isolates. Future studies on this sample set could use whole genome sequencing to describe other potential fosfomycin resistance mechanisms.

Conclusion

This study showed that the prevalence of fosfomycin-resistant UPEC start to increase with the increased reuse of fosfomycin antibiotic as a result of high resistance to other antibiotic classes. In this study we detected the presence of different variants of plasmid-mediated fos genes in fosfomycin- resistant E. coli strains. As far as we know, this is the first description of the plasmid-mediated fosfomycin-resistant UPEC in Egypt. Acquisition of the fosA genes by successful E. coli clones and efficient resistance plasmid vectors may restrict the usefulness of fosfomycin in MDR infections. Fosfomycin should be used carefully and the prevalence of fosA and other fos genes monitored closely. This study shows that, in our setting fosfomycin- resistant UPEC strains isolated from children belongs mainly to phylogenetic group E. Alteration in the phylogenetic types are important in identifying novel groups of emerging bacteria that are better recognized as a result of this analysis.

Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.

References

  1. Shaikh N, Mattoo TK, Keren R, Ivanova A, Cui G, Moxey-Mims M, Majd M, Ziessman HA, Hoberman A. Early antibiotic treatment for Pediatric Febrile urinary tract infection and renal scarring. JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170(9):848–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Navidinia M, Peerayeh SN, Fallah F, Bakhshi B, Sajadinia RS. Phylogenetic grouping and pathotypic comparison of urine and fecal Escherichia coli isolates from children with urinary tract infection. Braz J Microbiol. 2014;45(2):509–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Maczynska B, Frej-Madrzak M, Sarowska J, Woronowicz K, Choroszy-Krol I, Jama-Kmiecik A. Evolution of Antibiotic Resistance in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates in a Multi-Profile Hospital over 5 years (2017–2021). J Clin Med 2023, 12(6).

  4. Gupta K, Hooton TM, Naber KG, Wullt B, Colgan R, Miller LG, Moran GJ, Nicolle LE, Raz R, Schaeffer AJ, et al. International clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of acute uncomplicated cystitis and pyelonephritis in women: a 2010 update by the infectious Diseases Society of America and the european Society for Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(5):e103–120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Baquero-Artigao F, Del Rosal Rabes T. Fosfomycin in the pediatric setting: evidence and potential indications. Rev Esp Quimioter. 2019;32(Suppl 1):55–61.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Diez-Aguilar M, Canton R. New microbiological aspects of fosfomycin. Rev Esp Quimioter. 2019;32(Suppl 1):8–18.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Falagas ME, Vouloumanou EK, Samonis G, Vardakas KZ. Fosfomycin. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2016;29(2):321–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Garcia-Fulgueiras V, Caiata L, Bado I, Giachetto G, Robino L. Antibiotic susceptibility and fosfomycin resistance characterization in a cohort of children older than 6 years of age with urinary tract infection. Rev Argent Microbiol. 2022;54(2):120–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Loras C, Mendes AC, Peixe L, Novais A, Alos JI. Escherichia coli resistant to fosfomycin from urinary tract infections: detection of the fosA3 gene in Spain. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2020;21:414–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheesbrough M, Tropical Health T. District laboratory practice in tropical countries. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. CLSI. : Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 30th ed. Wayne, PA, USA: CLSI Supplement M100; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. In.; 2020.

  12. Nordmann P, Poirel L, Mueller L. Rapid Detection of Fosfomycin Resistance in Escherichia coli. J Clin Microbiol 2019, 57(1).

  13. Sorlozano-Puerto A, Lopez-Machado I, Albertuz-Crespo M, Martinez-Gonzalez LJ, Gutierrez-Fernandez J. Characterization of Fosfomycin and Nitrofurantoin Resistance Mechanisms in Escherichia coli isolated in clinical urine samples. Antibiot (Basel) 2020, 9(9).

  14. Clermont O, Christenson JK, Denamur E, Gordon DM. The Clermont Escherichia coli phylo-typing method revisited: improvement of specificity and detection of new phylo-groups. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2013;5(1):58–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hou J, Huang X, Deng Y, He L, Yang T, Zeng Z, Chen Z, Liu JH. Dissemination of the fosfomycin resistance gene fosA3 with CTX-M beta-lactamase genes and rmtB carried on IncFII plasmids among Escherichia coli isolates from pets in China. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56(4):2135–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Arca P, Reguera G, Hardisson C. Plasmid-encoded fosfomycin resistance in bacteria isolated from the urinary tract in a multicentre survey. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1997;40(3):393–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Benzerara Y, Gallah S, Hommeril B, Genel N, Decré D, Rottman M, Arlet G. Emergence of plasmid-mediated fosfomycin-resistance genes among Escherichia coli isolates, France. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23(9):1564.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Saladin M, Cao VT, Lambert T, Donay JL, Herrmann JL, Ould-Hocine Z, Verdet C, Delisle F, Philippon A, Arlet G. Diversity of CTX-M beta-lactamases and their promoter regions from Enterobacteriaceae isolated in three parisian hospitals. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2002;209(2):161–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Amin EK, Kotb AERI. Epidemiology of urinary tract infections in the children in zagazig university children’s hospital. Zagazig Univ Med J. 2019;25(6):909–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lu J, Wang L, Wei Y, Wu S, Wei G. Trends and risk factors of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase urinary tract infection in chinese children: a nomogram is built and urologist should act in time. Translational Pediatr. 2022;11(6):859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. El-Gamasy M, Fakhreldin A. Urine screening for a sample of egyptian school students: two centers experience. Int J Fam Commun Med. 2018;2:00031.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lehrasab W, Aziz T, Naheem Ahmed IA. Causative organisms of urinary tract infection and their sensitivity pattern in children. Annals of PIMS ISSN. 2016;1815:2287.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Oteo J, Orden B, Bautista V, Cuevas O, Arroyo M, Martinez-Ruiz R, Perez-Vazquez M, Alcaraz M, Garcia-Cobos S, Campos J. CTX-M-15-producing urinary Escherichia coli O25b-ST131-phylogroup B2 has acquired resistance to fosfomycin. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009;64(4):712–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rodríguez-Lozano J, de Malet A, Cano ME, de la Rubia L, Wallmann R, Martínez-Martínez L, Calvo J. Antimicrobial susceptibility of microorganisms that cause urinary tract infections in pediatric patients. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2018;36(7):417–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mueller L, Cimen C, Poirel L, Descombes M-C, Nordmann P. Prevalence of fosfomycin resistance among ESBL-producing Escherichia coli isolates in the community, Switzerland. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019;38:945–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mosime LB, Newton-Foot M, Nel P. Fosfomycin resistance in community-acquired urinary pathogens from western Cape, South Africa. South Afr J Infect Dis. 2022;37(1):321.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ali I, Rafaque Z, Ahmed S, Malik S, Dasti JI. Prevalence of multi-drug resistant uropathogenic Escherichia coli in Potohar region of Pakistan. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2016;6(1):60–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. El-Wafa MA, Abouwarda W. In vitro assessment of the antibacterial effects of the combinations of fosfomycin, colistin, trimethoprim and nitrofurantoin against multi‐drug–resistant Escherichia coli. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2022;74(3):334–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee H, Le JP. BOOK 1 Urinary tract infections. In.: PSAP; 2018.

  30. Hassuna NA, Khairalla AS, Farahat EM, Hammad AM, Abdel-Fattah M. Molecular characterization of extended-spectrum β lactamase-producing E. coli recovered from community-acquired urinary tract infections in Upper Egypt. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gad AH. The occurrence of Multidrug Resistant E. Coli which produce ESBL and cause urinary tract infections. J Appl Microbiol. 2017;1(2):8.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tharwat N, El-Sherif R, Elnagdy S, Marzaban R, Amer S. Virulent Escherichia coli strains among egyptian patients with acute diarrhoea versus urinary tract infection, and their antibiotic susceptibility. Arab J Gastroenterol. 2019;20(2):74–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Masoud SM, Abd El-Baky RM, Aly SA, Ibrahem RA. Co-existence of certain ESBLs, MBLs and plasmid mediated quinolone resistance genes among MDR E. coli isolated from different clinical specimens in Egypt. Antibiotics. 2021;10(7):835.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Li Y, Zheng B, Li Y, Zhu S, Xue F, Liu J. Antimicrobial susceptibility and molecular mechanisms of fosfomycin resistance in clinical Escherichia coli isolates in mainland China. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(8):e0135269.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. El-Baz R, Said HS, Abdelmegeed ES, Barwa R. Characterization of virulence determinants and phylogenetic background of multiple and extensively drug resistant Escherichia coli isolated from different clinical sources in Egypt. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2022;106(3):1279–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Čurová K, Slebodníková R, Kmeťová M, Hrabovský V, Maruniak M, Liptáková E, Siegfried L. Virulence, phylogenetic background and antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli associated with extraintestinal infections. J Infect Public Health. 2020;13(10):1537–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Dadi BR, Abebe T, Zhang L, Mihret A, Abebe W, Amogne W. Distribution of virulence genes and phylogenetics of uropathogenic Escherichia coli among urinary tract infection patients in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Yılmaz E, Aslantaş Ö. Phylogenetic group/subgroups distributions, virulence factors, and antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli strains from urinary tract infections in Hatay. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2020, 53.

  39. Clermont O, Condamine B, Dion S, Gordon DM, Denamur E. The E phylogroup of Escherichia coli is highly diverse and mimics the whole E. coli species population structure. Environ Microbiol. 2021;23(11):7139–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wachino J-i, Yamane K, Suzuki S, Kimura K, Arakawa Y. Prevalence of fosfomycin resistance among CTX-M-producing Escherichia coli clinical isolates in Japan and identification of novel plasmid-mediated fosfomycin-modifying enzymes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54(7):3061–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Sato N, Kawamura K, Nakane K, Wachino J-I, Arakawa Y. First detection of fosfomycin resistance gene fosA3 in CTX-M-producing Escherichia coli isolates from healthy individuals in Japan. Microb Drug Resist. 2013;19(6):477–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Cao X-L, Shen H, Xu Y-Y, Xu X-J, Zhang Z-F, Cheng L, Chen J-H, Arakawa Y. High prevalence of fosfomycin resistance gene fosA3 in blaCTX-M-harbouring Escherichia coli from urine in a chinese tertiary hospital during 2010–2014. Epidemiol Infect. 2017;145(4):818–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the health care workers of Pediatric department, Minia University hospital for their cooperation.

Funding

None.

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medical Microbiology and Immunology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Minia University, Minia, Egypt

    Wedad M. Abdelraheem, W. K.M Mahdi & Noha Anwar Hassuna

  2. Pediatric Department, Faculty of Medicine, Minia University, Minia, Egypt

    Ibtehal S. Abuelela

Authors
  1. Wedad M. Abdelraheem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. W. K.M Mahdi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ibtehal S. Abuelela
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Noha Anwar Hassuna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

NAH and WKM conceived and designed the study. ISA collected the samples and presented the patient’s data. WMA and NAH performed the experiment. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wedad M. Abdelraheem.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the research ethical committee of Faculty of Medicine, Minia University (approval number, 266:2022). The work has been carried out in accordance with the code of ethics of the world medical association (Declaration of Helsinki) for studies involving humans. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants’ parents.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdelraheem, W.M., Mahdi, W.K., Abuelela, I.S. et al. High incidence of fosfomycin-resistant uropathogenic E. coli among children. BMC Infect Dis 23, 475 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08449-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08449-9

Keywords

BMC Infectious Diseases

ISSN: 1471-2334

Contact us