Skip to main content
Download PDF

Clonal diversity of Staphylococcus aureus isolates in clinical specimens from selected health facilities in Ethiopia

BMC Infectious Diseases volume 23, Article number: 399 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is among the top three causative agents of nosocomial infection in Ethiopia. The majority of studies in Ethiopia have focused on the epidemiology of S. aureus in hospital settings, with limited molecular genotyping results. Molecular characterization of S. aureus is essential for identification of strains, and contributes to the control and prevention of S. aureus infection. The aim of the current study was to determine the molecular epidemiology of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates recovered from clinical specimens in Ethiopia. A total of 161 MSSA and 9 MRSA isolates were characterized using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and staphylococcal protein A (spa) typing. Based on the PFGE analysis, MSSA isolates were grouped into eight pulso-types groups (from A to I), while MRSA isolates clustered into three (A, B and C) pulso-types with more than 80% similarity. The spa typing analysis showed diversity of S. aureus with 56 distinct spa types. Spa type t355 was most prevalent (56/170, 32.9%), while eleven new spa types were detected including t20038, t20039, and t20042. The identified spa types were clustered into 15 spa-clonal complexes (spa-CCs) using BURP analysis; novel/unknown spa types were further subjected to MLST analysis. The majority of isolates belonged to spa-CC 152 (62/170, 36.4%), followed by spa-CC 121 (19/170, 11.2%), and spa-CC 005 (18 /170, 10.6%). Of the nine MRSA isolates, 2 (22.2%) were spa-CC 239 with staphylococcal cassette chromosome (SCC)mec III. These findings highlight the diversity of S. aureus strains in Ethiopia, as well as the presence of potentially epidemic strains circulating in the country necessitating further characterization of S. aureus for antimicrobial resistance detection and infection prevention purposes.

Peer Review reports

Background

Staphylococcus aureus is an important human pathogen causing a variety of infections in both healthcare facilities and community settings [1]. S. aureus is among the top three causes of nosocomial infection in Ethiopia. It was found to be the leading cause of nosocomial infection, accounting for 26.2% and 35.6% of infections in two hospitals in Ethiopia [2, 3]. In another hospital, S. aureus was the third leading cause, accounting for 20.6% of hospital-acquired infection [4]. The majority of studies were focused on antimicrobial susceptibility testing, with limited information on molecular epidemiology in Ethiopia [5, 6]. There was a single study showing the epidemiology of S. aureus using strain typing [7]. S. aureus are constantly changing, with novel strains appearing in different geographical regions [8,9,10]. Molecular characteristics of MRSA can be diverse in different hospitals within the same country [11].

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), Multi Locus Sequence Typing (MLST) and staphylococcal protein A (spa) typing have been used extensively to identify different S. aureus strain types. For methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), molecular typing of the staphylococcal cassette chromosome (SCC)mec, which harbors the gene encoding methicillin resistance, provides additional strain discrimination [12].

The most frequently reported global MRSA clonal complexes (CCs) include the following: CC1, CC5, CC8, CC22, CC30, CC45, CC59 CC80, and CC239. Many of these are distribute globally, while others are restricted to particular region [13]. The most widely distributed healthcare associated (HA)-MRSA clone include ST239-MRSA-III, ST22- MRSA-IV while the most common community associated (CA)- MRSA clones include ST8-MRSA-IV (USA300), ST80-IV-MRSA and ST30-IV-MRSA which has been reported in many countries around the world. On the other hand, clones such as ST59-MRSA-IV and ST93-MRSA-IV have displayed comparatively restricted geographical spread. The pandemic HA-MRSA clone, ST239/ST241-III-MRSA has been reported since 1980 and 1990 s from most parts of the world including Africa, Australia, Europe, Asia, North and South America [14,15,16].

Although, genotypic reports of S. aureus and MRSA in Africa are limited, some have highlighted the major clones circulating within the continent. Commonly reported CC circulating in Africa include CC5, CC7, CC21, CC30, CC121 and CC152 [7, 17, 18], as well as MRSA strains with different SCCmec types belonging to CC1, CC8, CC22, and CC88. Notably, the globally-distributed HA-MRSA strain ST239/ST241-MRSA-III has only been identified in Egypt, Ghana, Kenya, and South Africa [19].

Molecular genotyping of S. aureus prospectively in healthcare setting can determine prevalent strains, identify outbreaks and transmission routes of newer strains, and implement control and prevention of S. aureus spread within healthcare settings. The aim of the current retrospective study was to determine the molecular epidemiology of MSSA and MRSA from multiple antimicrobial resistance (AMR) surveillance sites in Ethiopia to evaluate for any potential clusters outbreak transmissions prospectively.

Methods

Study site description

Ethiopia has been implementing a laboratory-based AMR surveillance program since 2016 [20]. Currently, more than 10 sentinel sites are networked within the national AMR surveillance system. Among these sites, four have been actively participating in the surveillance program since the program was initiated. The four sites included in this study were: Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital (TASH), Addis Ababa; Amhara Public Health Institute - Dessie Branch (APHI), Dessie; Ayder University Hospital (AUH), Mekelle; and the Clinical Bacteriology and Mycology National Reference Laboratory at the Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI), Addis Ababa.

Sampling strategy

A total of 190 stored S. aureus isolates from the aforementioned AMR Surveillance sites were characterized in this study. The clinical specimens included wound/pus (n = 167), blood (n = 8), ear swabs (n = 6), and other body fluids including eye swabs (n = 9). The isolates were collected from 2016 to 2019 from their respective sites and transported to EPHI. The isolates used in the study were stocked using 20% glycerol and tryptic soya broth in a cryotube and stored at -80 freezer for further analysis. The isolates were tested at the respective AMR surveillance sites using classical microbiological methods. Specimens were cultured on sheep blood agar plate (BAP) and beta-hematolytic colonies with characteristics indicative of S. aureus were further sub-cultured on mannitol salt agar (MSA). Yellow colonies were then sub-cultured onto nutrient agar and isolates were identified as S. aureus based on catalase and coagulase positivity. The isolates were then shipped to The Ohio State University (OSU) for molecular characterization.

Diagnostic testing

All of the isolates were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility, spa type, Panton-Valentine leucocidin (lukF-PV), toxic shock syndrome toxin (tst), and 5 staphylococcal enterotoxin genes (sea, seb, sec, seh, sej) as previously described [21]. In addition, the isolates were characterized using PFGE, spa typing and the MRSA isolates were tested by using SCCmec typing. A subset of isolates with novel spa type patterns were also subjected to MLST analysis. The study protocol was approved by the EPHI Institutional Review Board (IRB) (Unique identifier: “EPHI-IRB-029-2017”). Data analyses were anonymous, and all phases of the study did not identify patients in any way.

Nucleic acid isolation

Genomic DNA was extracted using a commercially available kit (QIAamp DNA mini Kits, Germany), following the manufacturer’s protocol [22]. DNA extraction and PCR tests were done at the Infectious Disease Epidemiology Molecular Laboratory (IDEML) at OSU. The extracts were stored at -20 °C until further analysis. MLST and spa typing was performed at the Center for Discovery and Innovation, Hackensack Meridian Health, Nutley, New Jersey, USA.

Staphylococcal Cassette chromosome (SCC)mec typing and SCCmec-IV sub-typing

Nine MRSA isolates that were confirmed with mecA detection were tested for (SCCmec typing using PCR. Identification of cassette chromosome recombinase (ccr) alleles and mec class was used to determine SCCmec type as previously described [23]. For PCR master mix, illustra™ PuReTaq™ Ready-To-Go™ PCR Beads (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences, USA) were used in 25 µl reactions, and reference strains of known SCCmec types were used as controls throughout the PCR test.

Staphylococcal protein A (spa) typing

Spa typing was performed using PCR followed by Sanger sequencing, as previously described [24]. Assignment of spa type Based Upon Repeat Pattern (BURP) analysis for determination of spa clonal complex (spa-CC) was performed using Ridom StaphType. The Ridom SpaServer was used to predict the multi-locus sequence types (STs) as described previously [25]. Phylogenetic trees were constructed using RAxML Tree, Geneious Version 2022.2, (https://www.geneious.com).

Multi-locus sequence typing (MLST)

MLST was performed using the method described by Enright et al. [26] for 12 isolates with novel/unknown spa type patterns (11 MSSA and 1 MRSA). Allelic sequences for each gene were analyzed using Geneious software, and used to query the S. aureus database (https://pubmlst.org/saureus/) [27]. Clonal complexes (CC) were inferred for 6 of the strains using the BURST analysis software available on the PubMLST server; the remainder were singletons or novel sequence types unrelated to any other in the database.

Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE)

PFGE was performed for further characterization of both MSSA and MRSA isolates. The isolates were selected randomly, while considering the site and specimen type to identify clonal relatedness. DNA fingerprinting was performed by macro-restriction of chromosomal DNA using SmaI (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) and pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) as described previously [28]. The PulseNet “universal” standard strain Salmonella enterica serovar Braenderup H9812 was used as a reference marker. The chromosomal fragments were separated using a CHEF-DR®III Pulsed-Field Electrophoresis System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). Gel images were analyzed using Bionumerics Gelcompar II version 6. 6. software (Applied Math inc., Belgium). Cluster analysis was performed using the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic averages (UPGMA). Similarity coefficients were determined using Bionumerics by calculating the Dice coefficient similarity index. A similarity coefficient of 80% was selected to define individual pulso-types.

Results

Detection of virulence factor genes

Among the 190 total isolates, 172 were confirmed S. aureus. The remaining 172 S. aureus isolates tested for the presence of spa gene yielded positive results, while the mecA gene was detected in 9 of the isolates. None of the tested isolates were positive for mecC. Among the S. aureus isolates, 102 (59.3%) possessed the lukF-PV gene. A total of 66 (38.4%) isolates harbored at least one staphylococcal enterotoxin gene, while 31 (47.0%) isolates had more than one.

Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA)

Spa typing

The spa typing analysis revealed 56 distinct spa types among the 170 S. aureus isolates, the most common being: t355 (56/170, 32.9%), t085 (13/170, 7.6%) and t314 (11/170, 6.5%). The other spa types had less than 5% frequency each. Eleven novel spa types were also identified (Table 1) and registered in the Ridom SpaServer database (https://spaserver.ridom.de/). The spa types identified were clustered into 15 spa-clonal complexes (spa-CCs) by BURP analysis; however, 18 of the isolates could not be identified by this method (Fig. 1). The majority of the isolates belonged to spa-CC 152 (62/170, 36.5%), and consisted of four spa types: t1172 [1], t1299 [3], t355(56) and t454[2]; followed by spa-CC 121 (19/170, 11.18%), spa-CC 5 (18 /170, 10.59%), spa-CC 15 (15/170, 8.82%), and spa-CC 22 (10 /170, 5.88%). MLST was performed (Table 2) for several spa-types which could not be assigned to spa-CC, including t777, t1916, t1991, and t5338.

Table 1 Novel spa types identified
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Clonal complexes of Staphylococcus aureus isolates identified by Based on Repeat Pattern BURP analysis. spa-CC, clonal complex

Full size image

CC: Clonal complex; unk: unknown.

Multi-locus sequence typing (MLST)

Table 2 shows the MLST housekeeping genes, spa and clonal complex (CC) information for the 11 MSSA and one MRSA isolate. Among the 11 MSSA strains, 5 were assigned to CCs, including CC5, CC15, CC25, CC121 and CC398; these strains corresponded to spa-type t777, t605, t1916, t1991, and t5338, respectively. The remaining 6 MSSA strains displayed considerable variety, with multiple novel/unknown alleles in all 7 of the MLST housekeeping genes, which did not correlate to any existing sequence types (ST), nor to any known CCs. The isolate with spa-type t20037 is a double-locus variant of ST-5695, while isolate with spa-type t20038 is a single-locus variant of ST-2294; isolates with spa-types t20040 and t20041 are both singletons most closely related to ST-1852 and ST-5696, respectively; while isolate with spa-type t20036 is distantly related to ST-6984 (only matching 3 out of 7 loci). the closest match to the MRSA strain was ST 140 and was assigned to CC398; this corresponded to spa-types t3487.

Table 2 Multi-locus sequence typing housekeeping genes, spa type, and clonal complexes of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates
Full size table

PFGE

Based on the PFGE analysis, MSSA isolates (n = 41) exhibiting more than 80% similarity were grouped into eight pulso-types (A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H and I) (Table 2). PFGE pulso-type D comprised 8 isolates (8/51 15.7%). Except for one isolate (body fluid), the pulso-type D clusters were all from pus specimens.

Pulso-types E and G consisted of 3 isolates each, whereas the other pulso-types comprised 2 isolates each. All the tested isolates have relatedness. The three isolates contained in a cluster and sub-clusters E, F and I were identified from sample all collected from EPHI. Cluster B strains were identified from sample collected from TASH and EPHI. Cluster A and C strains were identified from sample collected from TASH and APHI, and Dessie respectively. Cluster G strains were identified from sample collected from EPHI and AUH. Cluster H strains were identified from sample collected from APHI and AUH, Dessie and Mekelle. The PFGE pulso-types and spa CC showed close correlation of strains (Table 3).

Table 3 Methicillin Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus isolates pulsed field gel electrophoresis results using 80% similarity cut off
Full size table

Methicillin Resistance Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)

Spa typing

The 9 MRSA isolates were assigned to four spa clonal complexes (CC 8, CC 55, CC 88, and CC 239) and seven spa types (t30, t86, t306, t311, t688, t1476, t3487) as shown in (Table 4). One MRSA isolate (t3487) could not be characterized by BURP analysis; MLST analysis determined it as a single-locus variant of ST-140, previously associated with CC398.

Table 4 Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome (SCC)mec and spa type of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates
Full size table

PFGE

The PFGE analysis for the MRSA isolates (n = 9) yielded three pulso-types (A, B and C) with 93.7, 88.0, and 90.3% similarity, respectively. Each pulso-type consisted of two MRSA isolates (Fig. 2). Two isolates had 58.3% relatedness and the distant MRSA were 50.03% similar with other strains. All MRSA strains showed over 46% relatedness. The two isolates in pulso-type A had identical antimicrobial resistance patterns. Isolates in pulso-types B and C had similar AMR patterns Table 4.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis dendrogram showing relatedness of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates

Full size image

SCCmec typing and SCCmec IV sub-typing

Four of the nine (44.4%) MRSA isolates were found to be SCCmec type IV, 2/9 (22.2%) isolates were SCCmec type III, 2/9 (22.2%) isolates were SCCmec type V and 1/9 (11.1%) isolate was SCCmec type VI (Table 4).

Discussion

The molecular epidemiology of S. aureus isolates circulating in Ethiopia has not been well-described previously. In this study, 56 different spa types and 15 spa clonal complexes were identified. Eleven of the spa types were novel, while six could not be assigned to spa or MLST clonal complexes, highlighting the diversity of S. aureus strains in Ethiopia. Among the S. aureus spa types identified, the most common included t085, t314 and t355. Interestingly, spa  type t355, clonal complex cluster CC152 is the most prevalent spa type reported in other east African countries [29]. This cluster was also the most prevalent in another study conducted in Ethiopia [7]. Spa-CC 152, spa-CC 5, spa-CC 8 and spa-CC 30 are among the most prevalent lineages identified in other African countries [17, 29, 30].

The strains characterized by MLST, were all associated with novel sequence types not found in the PubMLST database, with multiple unique alleles identified for each of the seven genes. Similar results were obtained in another study from Ethiopia, where more than half of the strains were shown to comprise novel STs with unique allelic combinations not found within the database [7]. The MRSA strain analyzed by MLST (spa type t3847) was shown to be closely related to ST-140, previously associated with CC398, a livestock-associated lineage [31]. This strain was reported on inanimate objects and from patient infection associated with hospital transmission elsewhere in Africa [18, 32].

Among the MSSA isolates, PFGE analysis identified eight distinct pulso-types, as well as several distantly-related strains. The PFGE results indicated that strains from different geographical areas were genotypically related. Another PFGE-based study conducted on S. aureus isolates from distinct regions of Ethiopia reported similar patterns [33]. The presence of similar strains in widespread areas is possibly related to the large-scale movement of people within Ethiopia, especially to the central region where the capital city Addis Ababa is located. In this study, the spa type assignments were closely correlated with PFGE pulso-types, similar to what has been described in other studies [34].

The three clusters of MRSA strains displayed relatedness regardless of geographic separation. One strain was found to exhibit > 80% relatedness with strains from AUH, Mekelle and EPHI. In addition, all MRSA isolates showed more than 46% similarity, suggesting relatedness between strains from different geographic location. Moreover, strains clustered within a single pulso-type also showed similar antimicrobial resistance properties. Other studies have also highlighted correlations between strain relatedness and antimicrobial resistance patterns [35, 36].

In this study, the most common spa-CC for MRSA strains were spa-CC 5, comprising SCCmec types, IV, V, and VI, and spa types t306, t311 and t688. Another study from Africa also reported spa-CC 5 as the most common lineage among MRSA strains [30, 37]. Previously, SCCmec types I–III were considered to be HA-MRSA, whereas SCCmec types IV and V were considered CA-MRSA [38]. In recent years, however, the distinction between HA-MRSA and CA-MRSA has blurred increasingly in recent years, as a growing number of reports have demonstrated that CA-MRSA lineages are now prevalent in hospitals [39, 40].

Two MRSA strains displayed 97.3% similarity using PFGE, and had identical SCCmec (type IVa) and spa (t086) types, as well as identical antimicrobial resistance patterns. Another two of MRSA strains were spa-CC 239 with SCCmec type III, and displayed multidrug resistance, suggestive of HA-MRSA. This result was consistent with other studies describing CC 239 SCCmec type III as being commonly associated with multidrug resistance and treatment failure [41, 42]. Moreover, CC 239 SCCmec type III was known to cause MRSA pandemic, circulating in many countries and also associated with serious illness such as admittance to ICU and high rate of death [16, 43].

Despite identification of some cluster, the study is limited by the retrospective nature of the isolates tested and lack of clinical and epidemiological information for linking the cases. In addition, the use of PFGE and spa typing are primarily used for local epidemiological investigation and cannot be applied to multiple sites without knowing if these are the endemic strains versus emerging outbreak strains. Unfortunately, more robust genotyping with MLST for all the isolates and/or whole genome sequence (WGS) could not be performed due to budgetary constraints.

Conclusion

The most predominant spa type in Ethiopia was found to be t355, belonging to spa-CC 152. The spa types identified in this study were closely associated with the PFGE pulso-types. Eleven new spa types were identified among the MSSA isolates, while among the MRSA isolates, strains with high antimicrobial resistance and global epidemic potential were identified. These findings highlight the diversity of S. aureus strains in Ethiopia, as well as the presence of potentially epidemic strains circulating in the country necessitating further characterization of S. aureus for antimicrobial resistance detection and infection prevention purposes in prospective study with MLST and/or WGS for country wide analysis.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Tong SYC, Davis JS, Eichenberger E, Holland TL, Fowler VG. Staphylococcus aureus infections: Epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015;28(3):603–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Et Al WM, Mulu W, Kibru G, Beyene G, Damtie M. Postoperative nosocomial Infections… POSTOPERATIVE NOSOCOMIAL INFECTIONS AND ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE PATTERN OF BACTERIA ISOLATES AMONG PATIENTS ADMITTED AT FELEGE HIWOT REFERRAL HOSPITAL, BAHIRDAR, ETHIOPIA.

  3. Feleke T, Eshetie S, Dagnew M, Endris M, Abebe W, Tiruneh M et al. Multidrug-resistant bacterial isolates from patients suspected of nosocomial infections at the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes. 2018 Aug 20;11(1).

  4. Gashaw M, Berhane M, Bekele S, Kibru G, Teshager L, Yilma Y et al. Emergence of high drug resistant bacterial isolates from patients with health care associated infections at Jimma University medical center: A cross sectional study. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018 Nov 19;7(1).

  5. Deyno S, Toma A, Worku M, Bekele M. Antimicrobial resistance profile of staphylococcus aureus isolates isolated from ear discharges of patients at University of Hawassa comprehensive specialized hospital. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2017;18(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mama M, Abdissa A, Sewunet T. Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of bacterial isolates from wound infection and their sensitivity to alternative topical agents at Jimma University Specialized Hospital, South-West Ethiopia. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2014 Apr 14;13(1).

  7. Verdú-Expósito C, Romanyk J, Cuadros-González J, TesfaMariam A, Copa-Patiño JL, Pérez-Serrano J, et al. Study of susceptibility to antibiotics and molecular characterization of high virulence Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from a rural hospital in Ethiopia. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(3):1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lakhundi S, Zhang K. crossm. 2018;32(iv).

  9. Nyasinga J, Omuse G, John N, Nyerere A, Abdulgader S, Newton M, et al. Epidemiology of <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> Infections in Kenya: Current State, Gaps and Opportunities. Open J Med Microbiol. 2020;10(04):204–21.

  10. Pérez-Montarelo D, Viedma E, Larrosa N, Gómez-González C, De Gopegui ER, Muñoz-Gallego I, et al. Molecular epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: Association of molecular factors with the source of infection. Front Microbiol. 2018;9(SEP):1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lee CY, Fang YP, Chang YF, Wu TH, Yang YY, Huang YC. Comparison of molecular epidemiology of bloodstream methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates between a new and an old hospital in central Taiwan. Int J Infect Dis. 2019;79:162–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Szabo J. Molecular methods in epidemiology of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): advantages, disadvantages of different techniques. J Med Microbiol Diagn. 2014;03(03).

  13. Boswihi SS, Udo EE. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: an update on the epidemiology, treatment options and infection control. Curr Med Res Pract. 2018;8(1):18–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Boswihi SS, Udo EE, Al-Sweih N. Shifts in the clonal distribution of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus in Kuwait hospitals: 1992–2010. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(9):1992–2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang X, Liu Y, Wang L, Qian S, Yao K, Dong F, et al. Clonal and drug resistance dynamics of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pediatric populations in China. Pediatr Investig. 2019;3(2):72–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang SH, Khan Y, Hines L, Mediavilla JR, Zhang L, Chen L, et al. Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus sequence type 239-iii, Ohio. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18(10):2007–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Perovic O, Iyaloo S, Kularatne R, Lowman W, Bosman N, Wadula J, et al. Prevalence and trends of staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in hospitalized patients in South Africa, 2010 to 2012: laboratory-based surveillance mapping of antimicrobial resistance and molecular epidemiology. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(12):1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Obasuyi O, McClure J, Oronsaye FE, Akerele JO, Conly J, Zhang K. Molecular characterization and pathogenicity of staphylococcus aureus isolated from Benin-City. Nigeria Microorganisms. 2020;8(6):1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lawal OU, Ayobami O, Abouelfetouh A, Mourabit N, Kaba M, Egyir B et al. A 6-Year update on the diversity of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones in Africa: a systematic review. Front Microbiol. 2022;13(May).

  20. Ethiopia AMR. Surveillance Plan_Final. https://www.ephi.gov.et/images/pictures/download2010/Ethiopia-AMR-Surveillance-Plan_Final.pdf

  21. Løvseth A, Loncarevic S, Berdal KG. Modified multiplex PCR method for detection of pyrogenic exotoxin genes in staphylococcal isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42(8):3869–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. QIAGEN, QIAamp. DNA Mini and blood Mini handbook. Qiagen. 2016;(5):1–72.

  23. Kondo Y, Ito T, Ma XX, Watanabe S, Kreiswirth BN, Etienne J, et al. Combination of multiplex PCRs for staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type assignment: Rapid identification system for mec, ccr, and major differences in junkyard regions. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51(1):264–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Aires-De-Sousa M, Boye K, De Lencastre H, Deplano A, Enright MC, Etienne J, et al. High interlaboratory reproducibility of DNA sequence-based typing of bacteria in a multicenter study. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(2):619–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Mellmann A, Weniger T, Berssenbrügge C, Rothgänger J, Sammeth M, Stoye J, et al. Based upon repeat pattern (BURP): an algorithm to characterize the long-term evolution of Staphylococcus aureus populations based on spa polymorphisms. BMC Microbiol. 2007;7:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Enright MC, Day NPJ, Davies CE, Peacock SJ, Spratt BG, JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY. Multilocus Sequence Typing for Characterization of Methicillin-Resistant and Methicillin-Susceptible Clones of Staphylococcus aureus [Internet]. Vol. 38,. 2000. Available from: http://mlst.zoo.ox.ac.uk.

  27. Jolley KA, Maiden MCJ. Using MLST to study bacterial variation: prospects in the genomic era. Future Microbiol. 2014;9(5):623–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tenover FC, Arbeit RD, Goering RV, Mickelsen PA, Murray BE, Persing DH, et al. Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed- field gel electrophoresis: Criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33(9):2233–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Nyasinga J, Kyany’a C, Okoth R, Oundo V, Matano D, Wacira S et al. A six-member SNP assay on the iPlex MassARRAY platform provides a rapid and affordable alternative for typing major african Staphylococcus aureus types. Access Microbiol. 2019;1(3).

  30. Kyany’a C, Nyasinga J, Matano D, Oundo V, Wacira S, Sang W, et al. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates from Kenya. BMC Microbiol. 2019;19(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Samutela MT, Kwenda G, Simulundu E, Nkhoma P, Higashi H, Frey A, et al. Pigs as a potential source of emerging livestock-associated Staphylococcus aureus in Africa: a systematic review. International Journal of Infectious Diseases. Volume 109. Elsevier B.V.; 2021. pp. 38–49.

  32. Obanda BA, Cook EAJ, Fèvre EM, Bebora L, Ogara W, Wang SH et al. Characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Patients in Busia County Referral Hospital, Kenya. Pathogens. 2022 Dec 1;11(12).

  33. Eyasu T, Tesfu K, Daniel A, Haile A, Thomas S, Pamela RFA, et al. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolates recovered from bovine milk in central highlands of Ethiopia. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2015;9(44):2209–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Güven Gökmen T, Kalayci Y, Yaman A, Köksal F. Molecular characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains by spa typing and pulsed field gel electrophoresis methods. BMC Microbiol. 2018;18(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pomorska K, Jakubu V, Malisova L, Fridrichova M, Musilek M, Zemlickova H. Antibiotic resistance, spa typing and clonal analysis of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates from blood of patients hospitalized in the Czech Republic. Antibiotics. 2021;10(4).

  36. Senda Mezghani M, Jihene Jdidi T, Gustave C, alexandre, Ilhem B, Maha M, Sophia B, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility and molecular epidemiology of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Tunisia: results of a Multicenter Study. J Infect Dis Epidemiol. 2019;5(2):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Conceição T, Coelho C, Santos-Silva I, De Lencastre H, Aires-De-Sousa M. Epidemiology of methicillin-resistant and -susceptible staphylococcus aureus in Luanda, Angola: first description of the spread of the MRSA ST5-IVa clone in the african continent. Microb Drug Resist. 2014;20(5):441–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Liu J, Chen D, Peters BM, Li L, Li B, Xu Z et al. Staphylococcal chromosomal cassettes mec (SCCmec): a mobile genetic element in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Microb Pathog. 2016.

  39. Kateete DP, Bwanga F, Seni J, Mayanja R, Kigozi E, Mujuni B, et al. CA-MRSA and HA-MRSA coexist in community and hospital settings in Uganda. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019;8(1):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Barcudi D, Sosa EJ, Lamberghini R, Garnero A, Tosoroni D, Decca L, et al. MRSA dynamic circulation between the community and the hospital setting: new insights from a cohort study. J Infect. 2020;80(1):24–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Jain S, Chowdhury R, Datta M, Chowdhury G, Mukhopadhyay AK. Characterization of the clonal profile of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from patients with early post-operative orthopedic implant based infections. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob [Internet]. 2019;18(1):1–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-019-0307-z.

  42. Monecke S, Slickers P, Gawlik D, Müller E, Reissig A, Ruppelt-Lorz A et al. Molecular typing of ST239-MRSA-III from diverse geographic locations and the evolution of the SCCmec III element during its intercontinental spread. Front Microbiol. 2018;9(JUL).

  43. Abd El-Hamid MI, Sewid AH, Samir M, Hegazy WAH, Bahnass MM, Mosbah RA, et al. Clonal diversity and epidemiological characteristics of ST239-MRSA strains. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12(March):1–13.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to acknowledge Ethiopia Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance team at EPHI, APHI-Dessie, AUH and TASH.

Funding

This work was supported by Sustainable One Health Research Training Capacity (OHEART): Molecular epidemiology of zoonotic foodborne and waterborne pathogens in Eastern Africa. Funded by the NIH Fogarty International Center (D43TW008650), through the Global One Health initiative (GOHi). The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Akililu Lemma Institute of Pathobiology, Addis Ababa University, Ababa, Ethiopia

    Rajiha Abubeker. Ibrahim, Solomon H. Mariam & Nega Berhe

  2. Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

    Rajiha Abubeker. Ibrahim, Tesfa Addis Kefale & Geremew Tasew Guma

  3. Ohio State Global One Health (GOH) LLC, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

    Rajiha Abubeker. Ibrahim & Eyasu T. Seyoum

  4. Colleges of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

    Zelalem Mekuria & Wondwossen A. Gebreyes

  5. Global One Health initiative (GOHi), The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

    Zelalem Mekuria, Shu-Hua Wang & Wondwossen A. Gebreyes

  6. Infectious Disease Division, Internal Medicine Department, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

    Shu-Hua Wang

  7. Center for Discovery and Innovation, Hackensack Meridian Health, Nutley, NJ, USA

    Jose R. Mediavilla & Barry Kreiswirth

Authors
  1. Rajiha Abubeker. Ibrahim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zelalem Mekuria
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shu-Hua Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jose R. Mediavilla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Barry Kreiswirth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Eyasu T. Seyoum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Solomon H. Mariam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Wondwossen A. Gebreyes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Tesfa Addis Kefale
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Geremew Tasew Guma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Nega Berhe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

RAI was responsible for data analysis and drafted the manuscript. ETS, JRM, BK for the study design and the manuscriptreviewing and editing. RAI, TAK and ZM performed microbiological and molecular studies. SW, NB, WAG and SHM advised the project. All authors approved reviewed and final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajiha Abubeker. Ibrahim.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by Ethiopian Public Health Institutional Review Board (Unique identifier: “EPHI-IRB-029-2017”). This was a retrospective study without any collection of clinical and personal information from patients and data analyses were anonymous. The need for informed consent was waived by Ethiopian Public Health Institutional Review Board, because of the retrospective nature of the study. All methods were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ibrahim, R.A., Mekuria, Z., Wang, SH. et al. Clonal diversity of Staphylococcus aureus isolates in clinical specimens from selected health facilities in Ethiopia. BMC Infect Dis 23, 399 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08380-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08380-z

Keywords

BMC Infectious Diseases

ISSN: 1471-2334

Contact us