Skip to main content

Clearance of blood stream infections in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a retrospective single-center cohort study



There are limited data on the treatment of blood stream infections (BSIs) in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Current guidance recommends documenting clearance only in fungal and Gram-positive BSIs. This study investigates the incidence and clinical significance of blood stream infections with positive repeat cultures (BSIPRC) in ECMO as well as clinical factors that may predict positive repeat cultures.


All BSIs in patients receiving ECMO at Brooke Army Medical Center between September 2012 and October 2021 were included in this study. BSIPRC was defined as re-isolation of the same organism on repeat blood cultures following an initial positive blood culture.


A total of 60 patients developed 87 BSI (38.5 BSI per 1000 ECMO days). Of the 80 (92%) BSIs who had repeat blood cultures drawn, patients had BSIPRC in 35 (44%) of cases. Fever, leukocytosis, and vasopressor requirement on day of repeat culture were not associated with persistent positivity. There was no difference in survival to discharge for patients with BSIPRC as compared to single day BSI (58% vs. 63%, p = 0.78). 19% of patients with Gram-negative bacteremia had BSIPRC, and gram-negative bacteremia in general was associated with an 83% morality.


There were no clinical findings that differentiated patients with BSIPRC from those who had a single day of positivity. BSI was associated with high mortality in patients with Gram-negative bacteremia. Given high incidence of positive repeat cultures being seen in Gram-negative BSIs, repeat blood cultures have utility for all BSIs in patients receiving ECMO.

Peer Review reports


Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) use has expanded significantly over the past decade with recent increases in veno-venous ECMO as a salvage therapy for those with reversible COVID-19 related respiratory failure or as a bridge to transplant. While ECMO has been shown to be a cost-effective tool in patients with respiratory failure, due to the critically ill nature of the patients and the need for long-term invasive access, ECMO has a high risk of hospital acquired infections [1, 2]. Blood stream infections (BSI) are associated with a three-fold increase in mortality in patients requiring ECMO support [3]. Despite the growing use of ECMO and its associated risk of infections, there are no guidelines and few data published that address the management of BSIs in ECMO patients.

One aspect of care that has limited data is the utility of repeat blood cultures for patients with BSI. For all patients, regardless of their status on an ECMO circuit, repeat blood cultures are generally recommended to document clearance in both Gram-positive and fungal BSIs [4, 5]. However, the low utility of follow-up blood cultures in Gram-negative BSI across a variety of settings have led to the practice of not testing for clearance in Gram-negative BSI. There is concern of risk for persistent BSI in critically ill patients receiving ECMO who have large cannulas in place for significant periods of time. This study aims to investigate the usefulness of repeat blood cultures in patients with BSI receiving ECMO to determine their clinical utility.


Study population

Positive blood cultures were reviewed from all adult patients who received ECMO at Brooke Army Medical Center, a 450-bed tertiary care center, between September 2012 and October 2021. Patients were determined to have a BSI if they had a positive blood culture and were treated with antibiotics by the treatment team. Patients were described as having blood stream infections with positive repeat cultures (BSIPRC) if an organism was re-isolated from blood cultures within 5 days of the original blood culture. At this center there is no routine antibiotic prophylaxis or use of surveillance cultures. Additionally, there was no standardized decontamination practices to include guidance on patient bathing or disinfection of the exposed ECMO circuit. Antibiotics were utilized at the discretion of the primary team without any standardized protocols related to patients receiving ECMO. The San Antonio Institutional Review Board reviewed the protocol and determined it was exempt and informed consent was not required.

Data collection and analysis

From the medical records, variables collected in this study included: patient age and sex, ECMO indication, cannulation and decannulation dates, culture data, as well as vital signs, laboratory data, and antimicrobial therapy on day of repeat cultures. Days until clearance was defined as days between the first positive culture and the first negative culture obtained. Patients were classified as being on appropriate antimicrobials if the isolate was susceptible to the antimicrobial therapy used on the day the culture was drawn. Bacterial isolates were determined to be multi-drug resistant organisms if they were resistant to three or more classes of antibiotics, as previously defined [6].

Patients with only a single day of positive cultures were compared to BSIPRC by type of organism, use of appropriate antibiotics, and patient variables on day of repeat cultures. Mortality was compared between BSI episodes only if the isolate was the last BSI to occur in a patient’s ECMO course. Nominal variables were compared by Chi-squared or Fisher’s Exact test as appropriate. Continuous variables were compared by a Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test. A 2-sided P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


During the study period, 282 patients received ECMO with 60 (21%) patients developing 87 BSI (1.45 BSI per patient; 19.7 infections per 1000 ECMO days) (Table 1). This cohort was predominantly male (77%) and had a median age of 42 (IQR: 30–48). COVID-19 accounted for the majority (53%) of admissions. Patients received ECMO for a median 7.8 [IQR: 3.6–17.6] days. Gram-positive organisms accounted for the majority of BSI with Enterococcus faecalis (25%) and Staphylococcus aureus (20%) being the most commonly isolated organisms. Multi-drug resistant organisms (MDRO) were responsible for 22/87 (25%) of blood stream infections. Of the 87 BSI, 80 (92%) had at least one repeat blood culture. Of the 7 patients who did not receive a repeat blood culture, 5 (71%) died within 2 days after the initial blood culture was collected. 85/87 of the BSIs were in the setting of veno-venous ECMO, whereas two were in patients receiving veno-arterial ECMO. For patients with repeat cultures, the median duration between initial blood cultures and first repeat blood cultures was 2 days. The median days of BSI culture positivity was 4 days [IQR: 3–7] for Gram-positive infections, 3 days [IQR: 2.5–3.5] for Gram-negative infections, and 3 days [IQR: 2–3] for fungal infections.

Table 1 All patient and blood stream infection characteristics

Of the 80 patients with repeat blood cultures within 5 days of first positive blood culture, 35 (44%) met criteria for BSIPRC (Table 2). BSIPRC was more common in Gram-positive (48%) and fungal (45%) infections compared to Gram-negative infections (19%). There was no association between BSIPRC and maximum temperature (median 37.5 IQR [37.1–37.9] vs 37.5 [37.2–38.1], p = 0.62) or leukocyte count (15.9 [11.6–21.2] vs. 14.7 [10.2–19.7], p = 0.5) on day of repeat blood cultures. The use of initial appropriate antimicrobials was similar between BSIPRC and patients with a single day of culture positivity (71% vs. 87%, p = 0.25). Furthermore, there was no association between a patient’s additional treatment modalities such as use of vasopressors (54% vs. 49%, p = 0.65), renal replacement therapy (46% vs 44%, p = 1.0), or intubation (71% vs 62%, p = 0.47) and having a BSIPRC. Finally, there was no difference in mortality (42% vs. 37%, p = 0.78) seen in patients whose last BSI was a BSIPRC.

Table 2 Multiple day vs single day blood stream infection characteristics

In patients with BSI with Gram-negative infections, 84% died before discharge, as compared to 24% in Gram-positive infections and 38% in fungal infections. Gram-negative BSIs were more often seen in patients receiving vasopressors (74% vs. 44%, p = 0.03) and renal replacement therapy (63% vs. 39%, p = 0.11) as compared to Gram-positive and fungal infections (Table 3).

Table 3 Gram-negative vs gram-positive and fungal infection characteristics

The subset of patients who developed Gram-negative BSIPRC were examined (Table 4). Most Gram-negative BSIPRC occurred in patients with COVID-19 and did not involve multi-drug resistant isolates. The median duration of positive blood cultures was five days and five (83%) of the patients died, two of which who never demonstrated clearance. Interestingly, both cases occurred in patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa with one patient having had bacteremia for 28 days as well as isolation from sputum cultures.

Table 4 Gram-negative blood stream infections with positive repeat cultures


Our study is the first to describe BSIPRC in patients requiring ECMO. Our findings show that Gram-positive and fungal infections have BSIPRC more frequently than Gram-negative infections without clear clinical criteria of what patients are likely to have repeat positivity. We also found that BSIPRC is associated with high mortality in Gram-negative infections. This study suggests a possible benefit of obtaining repeat blood cultures in patients receiving ECMO for all BSI regardless of infective organism.

The prevalence of ECMO BSI infections in the pre-COVID era has been reported around 5.5–18% [7,8,9,10,11]. Data looking at BSI’s in those specifically on ECMO due to SARS-CoV-2 infections is scarce. However several single center retrospective studies have reported BSI infection rates as high as 32–48% [12, 13]. Our reported BSI prevalence of 21% reflects a population with mixed indications for ECMO, however when specifically looking at the 70 patients in our study who were placed on ECMO secondary to SARS-CoV-2, we see the prevalence of BSI is 46%. Proposed explanations for this observation include higher rates of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) reported during the COVID-19 pandemic [14], high rates of pre-cannulation blood stream infections (12%), bacterial pneumonia co-infection (33%) seen in COVID-19 patients prior to ECMO initiation [15], and higher rates of secondary infections, especially VAP in COVID-19 patients post-cannulation, when compared to influenza controls [16, 17].

ECMO is associated with a high rate of secondary infections [18]. There are many proposed explanations for the high infection rate in ECMO including a predisposition to renal failure resulting in immunosuppression and dysregulation of the coagulation system, which promotes bacterial adhesion to catheters, or sequestration of leukocytes by the circuit [2, 16, 18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. Other possible etiologies include colonization of the ECMO catheter or membrane oxygenator [25, 26]. All of these mechanisms could contribute to the high number of patients with BSIPRC.

The organisms seen in this cohort are similar to the diversity previously described. Interestingly there was a high rate of Enterococcus faecalis as compared to previous studies. Nationally, E. faecalis is associated with nosocomial infections causing 7.7% of CRBSIs [27]. Enterococcal bacteremia has been shown to correlate with prolonged ICU stays [28]. The mean duration of ECMO hours in previous ECMO studies ranged from 168 to 307 [8, 29, 30] whereas in this study, the median duration of ECMO hours was 537 h and the longer time on ECMO may be a reason for increased infection rates. Further studies are needed to better elucidate the causes of bacteremia in ECMO.

While it is recommended practice to collect repeat blood cultures in patients who have Gram-positive or fungal BSIs, this is not the case for Gram-negative BSI [4, 5]. Previous large studies of Gram-negative bacteremia in hospitalized patients have shown that positive repeat cultures in the setting of gram-negative BSI are seen 6–11% of the time [31, 32]. When specifically looking at a subset of immunocompromised hospitalized patients, the frequency of positive repeat cultures in gram negative BSIs continues to be comparatively low at 3% [33]. At one academic center, BSIPRC was only seen in 4/38 of critically ill patients and was more commonly seen with endovascular sources of infection [34]. This low prevalence differs greatly from our study where 19% of patients with Gram-negative bacteremia had a positive repeat culture, which is similar to previously reported studies for Gram-positive organisms [31]. While in our study, we only observed patients with repeat cultures, a large metanalysis suggest mortality benefit for ordering repeat cultures in Gram-negative bacteremia [35]. Given the increased incidence of Gram-negative BSIPRC observed in this cohort, it would be reasonable to obtain repeat cultures for all BSIs in those receiving ECMO.

Furthermore, in this small study, there was no clinical criteria that differentiated patients who had BSIPRC from those who had single isolation of a pathogen. In studies limited to bacteremia, case–control analyses have also not shown differences in fever or leukocytosis between those persistently bacteremic [32]. This inability to identify patients with persistent BSI is even more plausible in a system such as ECMO where various vital signs such as temperature and blood pressure can be partially controlled by the circuit. Without reliable clinical signs that would suggest a BSIPRC, there is a further reason for repeating cultures to demonstrate clearance as the utility of clinical parameters do not appear to correlate.

In our cohort, mortality amongst those with Gram-negative bacteremia was high (83%), especially in those with BSIPRC, where 5/6 patients died before discharge. Few were multidrug resistant and half were on appropriate antibiotics at time of repeat blood cultures. There were two patients with significantly prolonged bacteremia despite appropriate antibiotics after their repeat culture was obtained. In the setting of proper antibiotics being used, this argues for a lack of source control. One possibility of a deep source is the lungs. In ECMO studies of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), recurrence culture positivity has been described as high as 79%, suggesting possible seeding from a protected space such as fibrotic lungs [16]. Additionally, previous studies have demonstrated gut hypoperfusion leading to increased gut permeability in those on cardiopulmonary bypass, further suggesting that a pathogenically colonized GI tract serves as another plausible source [36, 37].

This single center, retrospective, observational study is subject to several limitations. All cultures acquired by clinical team as part of clinical care without standardized protocols for repeat cultures. There was no standard antimicrobial regimen and therefore, only 80% of patients were on appropriate antibiotics at time of repeat culture. As primary teams were the ones who differentiated real infections from contaminants, it is possible that there were contaminants that were included in analysis. A majority of patients in this study were infected with SARS-CoV-2, which may differ from centers that treat different patient populations. It is unclear if the high mortality rate observed in those who developed Gram-negative BSIs is from the infection itself or rather was a manifestation of a critically ill patient. Finally, best practices have not yet been established for cannula or circuit exchange in the setting of bacteremia and will need further studies to better characterize.


In conclusion, this study evaluated BSIs in patients receiving ECMO and found that BSIPRC was commonly seen in Gram-positive and fungal infections, but were also seen in Gram-negative infections at much higher rates than described in patients who are not receiving ECMO. BSIPRC is associated with a high mortality in Gram-negative infections and there is no clinical data point to differentiate patients with a single day of positive cultures from a patient with multiple days of positive cultures. Therefore, in ECMO, it is reasonable to get repeat blood cultures in all patients with a BSI, regardless of the pathogen isolated.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



Blood stream infections


Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation


Blood stream infections with positive repeat cultures


Multi-drug resistant organism


Central line-associated bloodstream infections


Ventilator-associated pneumonia


  1. Peek GJ, Mugford M, Tiruvoipati R, Wilson A, Allen E, Thalanany MM, et al. Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;374(9698):1351–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Biffi S, Di Bella S, Scaravilli V, Peri AM, Grasselli G, Alagna L, et al. Infections during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: epidemiology, risk factors, pathogenesis and prevention. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2017;50(1):9–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Steiner CK, Stewart DL, Bond SJ, Hornung CA, McKay VJ. Predictors of acquiring a nosocomial bloodstream infection on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Pediatr Surg. 2001;36(3):487–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu C, Bayer A, Cosgrove SE, Daum RS, Fridkin SK, Gorwitz RJ, et al. Clinical practice guidelines by the infectious diseases society of America for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(3):e18-55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes DR, Clancy CJ, Marr KA, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, et al. Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Candidiasis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62(4):e1-50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Poulikakos P, Tansarli GS, Falagas ME. Combination antibiotic treatment versus monotherapy for multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant, and pandrug-resistant Acinetobacter infections: a systematic review. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;33(10):1675–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Aubron C, Cheng AC, Pilcher D, Leong T, Magrin G, Cooper DJ, et al. Infections acquired by adults who receive extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: risk factors and outcome. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013;34(1):24–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pieri M, Agracheva N, Fumagalli L, Greco T, De Bonis M, Calabrese MC, et al. Infections occurring in adult patients receiving mechanical circulatory support: the two-year experience of an Italian National Referral Tertiary Care Center. Med Intensiva. 2013;37(7):468–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Schmidt M, Brechot N, Hariri S, Guiguet M, Luyt CE, Makri R, et al. Nosocomial infections in adult cardiogenic shock patients supported by venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;55(12):1633–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yun JH, Hong SB, Jung SH, Kang PJ, Sung H, Kim MN, et al. Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of bloodstream infection in patients under extracorporeal membranous oxygenation. J Intensive Care Med. 2021;36(9):1053–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Quintana MT, Mazzeffi M, Galvagno SM, Herrera D, Boyajian GP, Hays NM, et al. A Retrospective study of infection in patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021;112(4):1168–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schmidt M, Hajage D, Lebreton G, Monsel A, Voiriot G, Levy D, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome associated with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(11):1121–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Saeed O, Tatooles AJ, Farooq M, Schwartz G, Pham DT, Mustafa AK, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of patients with COVID-19 supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a retrospective multicenter study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022;163(6):2107–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fakih MG, Bufalino A, Sturm L, Huang RH, Ottenbacher A, Saake K, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, central-line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), and catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI): the urgent need to refocus on hardwiring prevention efforts. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022;43(1):26–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Barbaro RP, MacLaren G, Boonstra PS, Iwashyna TJ, Slutsky AS, Fan E, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in COVID-19: an international cohort study of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry. Lancet. 2020;396(10257):1071–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Luyt CE, Sahnoun T, Gautier M, Vidal P, Burrel S, Pineton de Chambrun M, et al. Ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients with SARS-CoV-2-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome requiring ECMO: a retrospective cohort study. Ann Intensive Care. 2020;10(1):158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Marcus JE, Sams VG, Barsoumian AE. Elevated secondary infection rates in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2021;42(6):770–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Burket JS, Bartlett RH, Vander Hyde K, Chenoweth CE. Nosocomial infections in adult patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Clin Infect Dis. 1999;28(4):828–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hanna HA, Raad I. Blood products: a significant risk factor for long-term catheter-related bloodstream infections in cancer patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2001;22(3):165–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hocker JR, Wellhausen SR, Ward RA, Simpson PM, Cook LN. Effect of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on leukocyte function in neonates. Artif Organs. 1991;15(1):23–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mehall JR, Saltzman DA, Jackson RJ, Smith SD. Fibrin sheath enhances central venous catheter infection. Crit Care Med. 2002;30(4):908–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Musher D, Goldsmith E, Dunbar S, Tilney G, Darouiche R, Yu Q, et al. Association of hypercoagulable states and increased platelet adhesion and aggregation with bacterial colonization of intravenous catheters. J Infect Dis. 2002;186(6):769–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Vanholder R, Van Loo A, Dhondt AM, De Smet R, Ringoir S. Influence of uraemia and haemodialysis on host defence and infection. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1996;11(4):593–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zach TL, Steinhorn RH, Georgieff MK, Mills MM, Green TP. Leukopenia associated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in newborn infants. J Pediatr. 1990;116(3):440–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim DW, Yeo HJ, Yoon SH, Lee SE, Lee SJ, Cho WH, et al. Impact of bloodstream infections on catheter colonization during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Artif Organs. 2016;19(2):128–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kuehn C, Orszag P, Burgwitz K, Marsch G, Stumpp N, Stiesch M, et al. Microbial adhesion on membrane oxygenators in patients requiring extracorporeal life support detected by a universal rDNA PCR test. ASAIO J. 2013;59(4):368–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Weiner-Lastinger LM, Abner S, Edwards JR, Kallen AJ, Karlsson M, Magill SS, et al. Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with adult healthcare-associated infections: Summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network, 2015–2017. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020;41(1):1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Moses V, Jerobin J, Nair A, Sathyendara S, Balaji V, George IA, et al. Enterococcal bacteremia is associated with prolonged stay in the medical intensive care unit. J Glob Infect Dis. 2012;4(1):26–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bizzarro MJ, Conrad SA, Kaufman DA, Rycus P. Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Task Force on Infections EMO. Infections acquired during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in neonates, children, and adults. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2011;12(3):277–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sun HY, Ko WJ, Tsai PR, Sun CC, Chang YY, Lee CW, et al. Infections occurring during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use in adult patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;140(5):1125–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Canzoneri CN, Akhavan BJ, Tosur Z, Andrade PEA, Aisenberg GM. Follow-up blood cultures in gram-negative bacteremia: are they needed? Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65(11):1776–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wiggers JB, Xiong W, Daneman N. Sending repeat cultures: is there a role in the management of bacteremic episodes? (SCRIBE study). BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16:286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Buzzalino LG, Mease J, Bernhardi CL, Bork JT, Johnson JK, Claeys KC. Follow-up Blood Culture Practices for Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections in Immunocompromised Hosts at a Large Academic Medical Center. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022;9(5):ofac173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Maskarinec SA, Park LP, Ruffin F, Turner NA, Patel N, Eichenberger EM, et al. Positive follow-up blood cultures identify high mortality risk among patients with Gram-negative bacteraemia. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020;26(7):904–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Thaden JT, Cantrell S, Dagher M, Tao Y, Ruffin F, Maskarinec SA, et al. Association of follow-up blood cultures with mortality in patients with gram-negative bloodstream infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(9): e2232576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ohri SK, Bjarnason I, Pathi V, Somasundaram S, Bowles CT, Keogh BE, et al. Cardiopulmonary bypass impairs small intestinal transport and increases gut permeability. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;55(5):1080–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ohri SK, Somasundaram S, Koak Y, Macpherson A, Keogh BE, Taylor KM, et al. The effect of intestinal hypoperfusion on intestinal absorption and permeability during cardiopulmonary bypass. Gastroenterology. 1994;106(2):318–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not reflect the official policy or position of Brooke Army Medical Center, the Department of Defense, or any agencies under the U.S. Government.


No funding sources to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



SF was a major contributor in collecting, organizing, and analyzing the data as well as writing the manuscript. JM was a major contributor in analyzing the data as well as editing the manuscript. AM was a major contributor in editing the manuscript. MS was a major contributor in collecting the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Stone A. Frankford or Joseph E. Marcus.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Study has been granted an exemption from requiring ethics approval. This was determined by the Brooke Army Medical Center Human Research Protections Office (HRPO), Reference #942735. Given the retrospective nature of the study, the ethics committee also granted a HIPAA Waiver, thus this study was exempt from requiring informed consent. All methods were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Novel procedures or tools that deviated from usual clinical practice were not used. The study did not include research on stem cells, animals, plants, or geological material.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Frankford, S.A., Sobieszczyk, M.J., Markelz, A.E. et al. Clearance of blood stream infections in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a retrospective single-center cohort study. BMC Infect Dis 23, 63 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • ECMO
  • Blood stream infection
  • Clearance