Skip to main content
Download PDF

COVID-19: an opportunity of systematic integration for Chagas disease. Example of a community-based approach within the Bolivian population in Barcelona

BMC Infectious Diseases volume 22, Article number: 298 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

As a Neglected Tropical Disease associated with Latin America, Chagas Disease (CD) is little known in non-endemic territories of the Americas, Europe and Western Pacific, making its control challenging, with limited detection rates, healthcare access and consequent epidemiological silence. This is reinforced by its biomedical characteristics—it is usually asymptomatic—and the fact that it mostly affects people with low social and financial resources. Because CD is mainly a chronic infection, which principally causes a cardiomyopathy and can also cause a prothrombotic status, it increases the risk of contracting severe COVID-19.

Methods

In order to get an accurate picture of CD and COVID-19 overlapping and co-infection, this operational research draws on community-based experience and participative-action-research components. It was conducted during the Bolivian elections in Barcelona on a representative sample of that community.

Results

The results show that 55% of the people interviewed had already undergone a previous T. cruzi infection screening—among which 81% were diagnosed in Catalonia and 19% in Bolivia. The prevalence of T. cruzi infection was 18.3% (with 3.3% of discordant results), the SARS-CoV-2 22.3% and the coinfection rate, 6%. The benefits of an integrated approach for COVID-19 and CD were shown, since it only took an average of 25% of additional time per patient and undoubtedly empowered the patients about the co-infection, its detection and care. Finally, the rapid diagnostic test used for COVID-19 showed a sensitivity of 89.5%.

Conclusions

This research addresses CD and its co-infection, through an innovative way, an opportunity of systematic integration, during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Peer Review reports

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic has represented a persistent sanitary challenge since its inception, also for patients with parasitic diseases. This is notably the case of Chagas disease (CD) coupled with the acute COVID-19, with myocarditis [1] and other clinical manifestations [2] as well as the post-acute COVID-19 syndrome [3,4,5,6].

CD is mainly a chronic infection that principally causes cardiomyopathy and can also cause a prothrombotic status, putting the population infected with the parasite that causes it, Trypanosoma cruzi, at risk of presenting severe COVID-19 [2, 7]. One of the main challenges of CD control is the detection of cases. Worldwide it is estimated that < 10% of the estimated 6–7 million infected people have been diagnosed, leading to a high epidemiological silence [8,9,10]. CD, originally confined to the Americas, has been detected in up to 42 countries, due to the increased population movements of the last decades [11]. Since the first case was detected in Europe, 42 years ago [12] up to seventeen European countries have diagnosed CD cases, with the highest prevalence in Spain [13]. By contrast, in less than a year, the SARS-CoV-2 infection has rapidly spread in all world countries facilitating the epidemiological overlapping, co-infection and co-morbidiy.

CD is one of the Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs), as labeled by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2005 [14]. Despite the different public health initiatives of the last years at national and international level [15] and the existence of several CD patients organizations, gathered in an international federation (www.findechagas.org), affected people still struggle to get the attention they need, financial resources to mobilize, network and make their case in the micro politics climate in which health care is brokered. The “social determinants of health” are defined by WHO as “the conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work and age, and the wider set of forces and systems shaping the conditions of daily life”. They have had a great impact on CD patients since in most cases, it is more likely to affect disadvantaged people who are economically and politically vulnerable [16, 17]. This is especially the case of migrant populations facing multiple challenges in their access to healthcare services, including diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Besides, psycho-emotional and socio-anthropological barriers are extremely significant in the case of CD [18,19,20,21,22], and specifically the fear of the disease and the social stigma it might trigger [23].

Other barriers, related to administrative processes and healthcare access, are also quite important since the majority of the potentially affected population is immigrant and most of the time, not familiar with the administrative procedures of their host countries [24]. This calls for a multidimensional analysis and approach [25], that the public health & community team (eSPiC) of the Unit of Tropical Medicine and International Health Drassanes-Vall d’Hebron (UTMIHD-VH) has started to put in place since 2008. It has indeed been working with the Latin American community in Barcelona to promote and enhance CD diagnosis [26]. Since 2014, the eSPiC/UTMIHD-VH has implemented community screenings of T. cruzi infection for people of Latin American origin living in Catalonia. In parallel, it also entered into a partnership with the General Consulate of Bolivia in Barcelona (Table 1) in order to promote community-based actions based on information, education and communication (IEC) components, reducing underdiagnosis within the Bolivian community (historically the community with the highest rate of T. cruzi infection), provide quality care, follow up to the infected individuals and, eventually, prevent congenital transmission [1, 2, 25,26,27,28,29,30,31].

Table 1 Key methodological components of the study background led by UTMIHD-VH (2008–2019) in the city of Barcelona
Full size table

In light of the pandemic, the idea of a community-based approach of CD and COVID-19 arised as an opportunity of systematic integration (OSI). The “community-based” term refers to a philosophical approach in which communities play an active role, highlighting and addressing the issues they identify as important to them. Communities are notably encouraged to actively design, develop and deliver their own prevention and intervention strategies, which challenges community members to identify what the issues are and work together to address those issues [32]. OSI are strategies developed in order to face the challenges of coinfection and co-morbidity between diseases. Worldwide, they have progressively been implemented since 2007 and proved to have positive outcomes on different diseases. Among OSI examples we notably find the following: diagnosis of haemoparasites infection (Plasmodium spp., filariasis spp. and T. cruzi) through malaria films [33, 34]; screening of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Hepatitis B (HBV), Syphilis and CD at birth [35]; screening of opportunistic infections that define AIDS condition [36, 37]; dual epidemiology approach (with communicable and noncommunicable diseases) in the screening of chronic diseases that can cause chronic cardiomyopathy (CD, rheumatic heart disease, hypertension, diabetes, cardiorenal syndrome…) [8, 38].

OSI used by the CD Control Programme of WHO could apply to the complex situation generated by the COVID-19 syndemic [39] and co-infection with T. cruzi infection. The opportunities are given in the coincidence in space and time of two or more existing processes or elements. The opportunities already exist, and the challenge is to identify them. The OSI can offer the possibility to increase detection, diagnosis confirmation, care, prevention, control and cost-effectiveness. Once an OSI has been identified, the non-integration can be considered as a missing opportunity or even a bad practice [8].

We drew on previous community-based experiences, including participative-action-research components already known and well accepted by health professionals and community leaders and members [40].

The four specific objectives of the study were:

  1. 1.

    To assess the percentage of people with Bolivian nationality previously screened for T. cruzi infection in Barcelona and determine where the diagnosis of T. cruzi infection took place.

  2. 2.

    To diagnose T. cruzi infection cases, determine the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and co-infection among Bolivian nationals in Barcelona.

  3. 3.

    To assess the feasibility of an OSI based on a community-based approach for SARS-CoV-2 and T. cruzi infections and co-infection.

  4. 4.

    To determine the performance of a serologic rapid diagnostic test for COVID-19 used in the integrated approach.

Methods

The work was carried out in the Metropolitan area of the city of Barcelona, Autonomous community of Catalonia, Spain, among the Bolivian community during the national Bolivian elections organized on 18th October 2020 (Fig. 1). In 2019, Catalonia had a population of 7,619,494 inhabitants, with 1,159,427 foreigners, 29,570 Bolivian nationals of which 8495 lived in Barcelona city [41].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Left: General view of the field study place, with two mobile units and a stand. Right: Community health workers and members of the association of people affected by Chagas disease (ASAPECHA) offering information and infection screening to people that came to vote. Photo: Jordi Gómez i Prat, 2020

Full size image

Key background methodological components this study is based on are specified in the Table 1. Sequentially, the UTMIHD-VH decided to use the 2020 Bolivian national elections for the first time to target the community. This was enabled by the long lasting collaboration and work of awareness raising with official representatives of the Consulate of Bolivia. In the context of COVID-19 restrictions, the Bolivian elections were the only event that could attract the highest number of Bolivians in the metropolitan area of Barcelona. All Bolivian nationals were eligible to participate in the screening.

Participants were recruited by community health agents and peer-to-peer educators from ASAPECHA Barcelona (association of friends of people with Chagas disease of Barcelona) who had been previously trained on the multidimensional approach of the disease. Their main focus was on the psycho-social aspects that make access to CD diagnosis difficult. They interviewed the participants and informed them about CD, the barriers to healthcare access, and the importance of CD diagnosis and treatment. The interviewers also gave them information specifically relevant to their own case/history.

Additionally, participants were asked if they had already heard of CD before, and if they had already been tested for it and where. Afterwards, the participants who had never been tested for CD before were offered the chance to get screened in situ for both the T. cruzi and the SARS-CoV-2 infection, taking advantage of a unique blood extraction, taken by the mobile teams of the Blood and Tissue Bank of Catalonia (BTBC). Key methodological components of the community-based approach intervention are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2 Key methodological components of the community-based approach intervention of CD and COVID-19 in the city of Barcelona (2020)
Full size table

The informative and educational activity was successfully carried out in the waiting line before entering to vote, by peer educators. After voting, they welcomed the volunteers to participate in the study. Sociodemographic data gathering from participants was done by community health agents before blood extraction. The data gathered, as well as any referred symptomatology, was verified and registered in the SAP NetWeaver. This computer software was previously reconfigured so that the two screening tests could be requested in a single request, unequivocally for each person.

The serologic screening of the T. cruzi infection was done with a chemiluminescence technique using recombinant antigen (Elecsys Chagas. Roche). Following the WHO diagnostic recommendations for the diagnosis of chronic CD, an ELISA technique using a native antigen (Ortho T. cruzi ELISA, Ortho diagnostics) was also performed in positive samples. Patients with both positive serological results were considered infected. If both tests were negative, infection was ruled out. Sera with a positive recombinant ag test and a negative ag test were considered discordant. To test SARS-CoV-2 infection, the sera underwent a determination of total antibodies by chemiluminescence (Elecsys Anti SARS-CoV-2. Roche). When positive, a detection of specific anti-IgG was confirmed by chemiluminescence (LIAISON® SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG. Diasorin).

Additionally, sera with positive total antibodies were tested with a rapid immunochromatographic assay (Fastep COVID-19 IgG/IgM Rapid Test Kit. Grifols), which enables detecting separately both IgG and IgM.

People with a positive result on one of the two screening tests were contacted by phone and referenced to the UTMIHD-VH to initiate bio-psychosocial care, including antiparasitic treatment, follow-up and determine if the cardiac, digestive and/or neurological systems were affected and to what extent. In case of a positive serological result for COVID-19, patients with T. cruzi infection were informed about possible future health implications and their right to be vaccinated in priority for COVID-19. The patient's condition was registered in the electronic medical records (software SAP) of the Catalan Health Institute and in the App called “La meva Salut” of the Catalan Health Service, Department of Health of the Government of Catalonia (DH/GC) (https://lamevasalut.gencat.cat/es).

All the subjects who were interviewed gave verbal consent to participate in the in situ screening. This is part of the conventional protocol of our clinics to screen susceptible CD individuals and provide healthcare to diagnosed patients. The procedures performed during the screening are the ones recommended by WHO. No data containing personal or identifying information from the participants has been published.

The resources used, including infrastructure, instruments, consumables, human resources and time, were calculated based on the following: (i) experience of previous community screening actions with the 29,570 Bolivian residents in Catalonia; (ii) specific COVID-19 prevention measures implemented by DH/GC; (iii) voting time period (from 8 to 17 h); (iv) availability of existing resources on the day of election (Sunday 18 October 2020).

The statistical analyses were performed using Stata v14 (StataCorp. 2015. Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. College Station, TX, USA: StataCorp LP). Median and interquartile range (IQR) as well as proportions were used for the description of quantitative variables and qualitative variables, respectively. To assess the association between the different variables, the Chi squared test and the Fisher’s exact test were performed.

Results

Percentage of people with Bolivian nationality previously screened for T. cruzi infection in Barcelona and determination of the place of infection diagnosis

Out of the 7421 people censused in the Plurinational Electoral Body of Bolivia and having the city of Barcelona as a voting place, 4866 (65.57%) participated in the Bolivian national elections and 1200 (16.17%) were finally informed and interviewed at random at their arrival at the polling place. In order to know the percentage of people screened for T. cruzi infection and place of diagnosis, 604 people, out of the 1200 people informed and interviewed, were specifically asked if they had undergone a previous screening and 272 (45%) said no. The 332 people (55%) who answered positively were also asked whether and where they were diagnosed and 269 (81%) answered that it was in Catalonia and the rest (19%) in different Bolivian departments. All samples were aleatory and statistically representative, with a confidence interval of 95% and a precision/accuracy of ± 5% units.

Prevalence of T. cruzi and SARS-CoV-2 infections and co-infection rates in the migrant population with Bolivian nationality in Barcelona

A total of 299 people were finally screened for T. cruzi and SARS-CoV-2 infection. The median age was 43 years (IQR 33–53). Among those screened, 65.9% (197/299) were women and all participants were born in Bolivia (Table 3).

Table 3 Demographic characteristics of the Bolivian population that underwent in situ T. cruzi and SARS-CoV-2 infections screening
Full size table

Out of the 299 screened people for T. cruzi infection, 55 (18.3%) of them presented a positive result of the chemiluminescence and ELISA tests, 3.3% [10] presented discordant results (a positive chemiluminescence result followed by a negative ELISA result) and 78.3% (234) presented both negative results. A total of 61.8% (34/55) of the positive results were in women, but 17.3% (34/197) of all screened women presented positive results, while 20.6% (21/102) of all screened men presented positive results.

The median age of people with positive serologic results was 48.4 years (IQR 39–57.8). Among all people with positive results, the age decade with the highest prevalence of infection was 40–49 years old (36.4%) (Table 4).

Table 4 Description of the demographic characteristics of the Bolivian individuals that tested positive to the screening tests for T. cruzi and SARS-CoV-2 infections performed during the community interventions
Full size table

In relation to the decade of age, we found a total of 40.0% (8/20) of positive results in those older than 60 years, 26.6% (17/64) in those between 50 and 59 years, 18.7% (20/107) in those between 40 and 49 years, 11.8% (10/85) in those between 30 and 39 years and no cases were found (0/23) among those < 30 years of age (Fig. 2). The difference between decades was statistically significant (Chi: 0.002/Fisher: 0.001).

Fig. 2
figure 2

T. cruzi and SARS-Cov-2 infection rates by group age

Full size image

The determination of SARS-CoV-2 IgG was positive in 22.3% (67/299) of the total population. A total of 61.2% (41/67) of the positive results were in women; 20.8% (41/197) of all screened women presented positive results, while 25.5% (26/102) of all screened men presented positive results.

The age group with the highest number of positive results of the screening test was 40–49 years (49.2% of the total positive results) (Table 4). The study found a positivity rate of: 15% (3/20) of people > 60 years old; 17.2% (11/64) of people between 50 and 59 years old; 30.8% (33/107) for those between 40 and 49 years old; 15.3% (13/85) among the people between 30 and 39 years old and 30.4% (7/23) among those < 30 (Fig. 2). There is hence a great difference between age categories (Chi: 0005).

Finally, it is interesting to highlight that out of the 299 screened people 18 individuals that tested positive for T. cruzi infection also tested positive for anti-SARS-CoV-2, which represents a coinfection prevalence of 6%.

Feasibility of an OSI based on a community-based approach for SARS-CoV-2 and T. cruzi infections and co-infection

After voting, 299 participants who had not been previously tested accepted to be screened in situ for both the T. cruzi infection and the SARS-CoV-2 infection. This represents an acceptability rate of 55% (299/540), since 45% (or 540 out of the 1200) of the people that were interviewed had never been previously tested and considered it to be a good opportunity.

Based on the specified methodological calculations, the following resources were finally used: two mobile units of the BTBC, with two usable stretchers per unit; one physician and one nurse, public health experts, coordinating the whole implementation; four nurses for the blood extraction distributed in the two mobile units and one tent; five community health agents from UTMIHD-VH and seven peer educators, (members of the ASAPECHA Barcelona) doing IEC and recruitment.

Table 5 shows that an integrated approach of both SARS-Cov-2 and CD per patient takes on average 20 min, in comparison to 15 for a first consultation for CD, which represents an additional 25% of time of doing a unique CD approach.

Table 5 Time per patient needed for the integrated approach for CD and COVID-19
Full size table

The study also showed that the use of the SAP NetWeawer program eased the process. The laboratory work was quite speedy since it consisted of tagging and processing the samples at the same time. Those tasks were carried out by a team as well as an automated chemiluminescence immunoassay, which enables suctioning the collected material directly from the extraction tube. It is hence time saving since there is no need to aliquot or centrifuge the samples.

Performance of a rapid diagnostic test for COVID-19 used in the integrated approach

A rapid diagnostic test (RDT) was carried out on the 68 sera that presented positive antibodies to COVID-19 in the chemiluminescence immunoassay (CHIA). The following results were obtained: 89.5% (60/67) tested positive for IgG and 61.2% (41/67) tested positive for IgM. This showed a high performance of the rapid tests. Due to the high sensitivity of the CHIA, none was carried out on the negative sera.

Discussion

This article describes an innovative and pioneer integrative approach for the field of healthcare. Through a community approach, two diseases—COVID 19 and CD—were tested on one single occasion, enabling potential infected people to access healthcare for the first time. This work was based on fourteen years of previous work (Fig. 3), during which awareness raising activities and discussions took place with a wide array of actors going from immigrants, health and civil society organizations to governmental institutions based in the city of Barcelona. The collaboration of more than five years with the Bolivian Consulate in Barcelona was one of the key elements to be able to carry out this study and work with the population at higher risk.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Timeline of project interventions in the city of Barcelona between 2007 and 2020, with epidemiological Chagas disease data between 2014 and 2020

Full size image

Previous in situ screening actions were performed between 2014 and 2017 at the occasion of different Bolivian community events and previously described by our group [27, 28]. The technical appoach of community actions on the recruitment of patients for screening tests has also been described at the occasion of: workshops performed in 2012 and in 2013 [43] in Bergamo, Italy,); informative group talks in Madrid, Jerez de la Frontera and Alicante, Spain, between 2007 and 2010 [44]; and the combined use of informative brochures and workshops at Bolivian community events in the case of Munich, Germany, in 2013 and 2014 [45]. Those previous experiences taught us that having people specifically trained on CD and its different components before undertaking a study was key to its implementation and development. It enables a “conscious action”, in which the actors are fully aware of all the socio-psychological dimensions of CD and know how to help and lead people to overcome them [46]. Besides, the fact that the people raising awareness and playing the part of reaching to the people at the voting site were from the organized civil society (as ASAPECHA members) with a trained background (as Expert Patient Programme for CD), created an in-depth feeling of equality and trust for the people. That was determinant for the good implementation of the study [42].

The implementation of an OSI approach highlights several benefits [8]. It optimizes time, human capital, economic resources, IEC materials, infrastructure, as well as instruments and consumables, especially in the laboratory work. It increases efficiency and effectiveness, and from the public health point of view, the failure to identify and take advantage of existing OSI can be considered a major missing opportunity.

This operational research represents a real turning point for our team in Barcelona and more generally, the field of CD. The public health field is characterized by a search for “impact and effectiveness of programs”, a space in which rational choice calculation operates as to determine where to allocate resources and where the benefits of an envisaged intervention would be highest compared to what would happen if such intervention did not take place [47]. From a public health policy perspective there is hence no incentive and no interest in mobilizing extensively for a NTD such as CD.

Out of the 604 people asked about previous T. cruzi infection screening, 332 (55%) of them answered affirmatively. Since the study was eventually able to screen 299 people, it reached one of the highest acceptability rates (55%) for this type of study as well as the largest T. cruzi infection screening coverage in the world right now [10]. Considering that in 2014 the coverage rate was 17.7% [27] (Fig. 3), significant progress was made, as also witnessed in our study of 2017, where the coverage rate was 45.4% [28]. Another key finding is that 81% of the people with Bolivian nationality have been diagnosed in Catalonia. Indeed, since 2005, active and passive screening have been progressively implemented in the territory, with 33% of diagnoses done in CD-specialized health facilities; 21.2% community health actions; 8% at primary health level and 37.8% in a miscellaneous of additional places [28]. The activities implementation of the blood and tissues bank of Catalonia since 2005 and the programme of congenital CD since 2010 have played a significant role.

The prevalence of CD among the people that were tested was 18.3%, a higher value than the 8.9% we found in 2017 in Barcelona (Fig. 3). Other studies also showed similar prevalences, between 9.3% and 27.7% [43,44,45, 48]. A similar random effect pooled prevalence of 18.1%, within the Bolivian population, and lower prevalence of 4.2% within Latin American population, were both calculated in 2015, from 18 studies of five European countries, [49]. It marked the first time a population sample was obtained in a national election with mandatory voting. So, with most probable values of infection closer to reality. On the other hand, the Bolivian population shows once more one of the highest T. cruzi prevalence rates of infection in the world.

The detection of IgG antibodies indicates exposure to the SARS-CoV-2 virus and permits to estimate the prevalence in a specific population. Until now, no prevalence studies have been done on SARS-CoV-2 and migrant communities. The prevalence of 22.3% of the virus among the Bolivian population is way higher than the one found in the overall population of the province of Barcelona (6.8%) or the one found in Spain’s foreign population (5.7%) [50]. That can notably be explained, as stated earlier, by sociocultural factors such as work and living conditions in which lationamerican immigrants often find themselves in their host country. Some interviews done during the study also highlight that members of that community are more likely to gather—fueling the spread of the virus—and be fearless of the disease [51]. Because of their economic status, potentially infected people tend to live in dwellings and work in positions with major exposure to the COVID-19 virus. They are part of a category of people that has a limited capacity to take preventive measures, leading to a higher prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among them [52]. The 2003 outbreak of SARS also taught us that the attitude when confronting an infectious disease depends on the understanding and the level of panic within the population itself. They are hence important variables when trying to prevent the spread of the virus [53, 54].

Finally, it is interesting to look at the age variable when studying the CD prevalence. As we saw, the range with the highest number of cases was the one of people 40–49 years old. This is significantly different from our last study [26], where the highest number of affected individuals were 50–59 years old. However, when looking at the prevalence rate per age range we found that the highest value was among the group of individuals over 60 years old, followed by the 50–59 years old, and so on. This reflects the fact that over the last decades, there has been an improvement in the transmission control of CD in Bolivia.

On the other hand, Pollan [50] showed that the age variable does not play a role when it comes to SARS-CoV-2. However, as shown earlier, there is a statistical difference in our study—with significantly more cases among people 40–49 years old and under 30 years old. This fact could be explained by the dynamics of socialization of these groups.

Because this study was based on one single event—national election day in Bolivia—the screening was conducted on a high number of people in one single day: 1200. Out of those, we managed to fully test 299 people. In comparison, in two of our previous studies, in both 2014 and 2017, we respectively tested 169 and 271 people in 2 days [28]. As other elements of comparisons, we can also think of other community studies that took place in the city of Bergamo, Italy, and in the city of Madrid, Spain. In Bergamo, 1,305 people were screened as a result of different workshops carried out over a year (3–4 people per day) [43] and in Madrid, 352 people were tested in 44 workshops carried out over two and a half years (eight people per workshop) [44]. The number of 299 screened people represents an acceptability of 55% (299 out of 540 people), which demonstrates good feasibility and acceptability of community intervention. Because only one fourth of the people who participated in the elections were interviewed (1200/4866), the study shows that four times the number of resources would have been needed to interview all participants.

Community interventions are group activities planned and carried out in a collaborative manner in the community and aimed at improving health and well-being through the empowerment of the affected people [55]. The share of people that agreed to be screened was quite similar to the ones we (and other groups) had in previous studies conducted on people potentially infected with T. cruzi. It has been agreed that the psycho-emotional and socio-anthropological factors are highly relevant to access care. This work fundamentally contributes to reconstructing perceptions around CD and even COVID-19 on the part of those affected, the general population and the health professionals themselves.

Another major takeaway of this study is that following this same model of communitary actions, both in rural and urban areas, it is possible to really integrate people in the development and execution of health strategies on the long run. People become truly aware of the risks they incur and of the steps they need to take to take care of their own health [56].

Other key elements to facilitate the recruitment of people and enhance access to diagnosis and care were the creation of a multidisciplinary community health team, involving Primary Health Care, as well as the use of community strategies based on studies about the socio-anthropological and psychological aspects of the disease [28].

As the results show, the investment in human capital as well as in logistics was minimal for a comprehensive but successful approach of promotion, prevention and care. Working with people already knowledgeable about CD enabled us to optimize the time dedicated to each person while giving excellent care and duly informing about the disease and its specifics.

A significant experience of the study was the reprogramming of the lab software (SAP NetWeaver) to process simultaneously the two screening tests of these two different infectious diseases in a single request. The current digital health revolution facilitates the invention of new decision support systems and can be a facilitator instrument to implement different OSI with a systemic approach. The technological evolution in screening, collection of data, diagnosing, treatment, storing, processing as well as the use of deep learning can definitely lead to improved health indicators [57].

Despite the fact that the best sensitivity to detect SARS-CoV-2 antibodies is obtained through conventional serological tests, this study has shown a sensitivity rate of RDT above 89%. This, coupled with the fact that they are easy to use and that results are obtained rapidly, put them as a good option to use in situ of community studies [58].

Despite its devastating consequences, the COVID-19 pandemic gave new opportunities worldwide in a wide array of matters, opening doors for new ways of thinking and acting. This work relates a concrete example of our capacity to bring about inspiring and practical solutions at a local level when facing uncertainty. As such, the study that this paper presents, was enabled by the crisis context itself. COVID-19 appeared as an opportunity window for CD, setting it on the agenda of the Bolivian consulate. John W. Kingdon [59] identifies an opportunity window when three autonomous and different streams meet: problem stream, policy stream and political stream. Applied to our study, this model highlights CD as the problem stream—there is an issue and something can be done to fix it; the people that mobilize in order to address the problem—notably the UTMIHD-VH—as the policy stream; and finally, the Bolivian national elections as the political stream, where ideas, alternatives and solutions to the situation are presented. In the case of the following study, it is clearly COVID-19 that acted as a “window opener” for CD to be tested massively on Bolivian nationals.

Conclusion

This study shows one path to fight the current underdiagnosis of CD through a community-based approach, encompassing fully the multidimensional understanding of CD. Additionally, it shows that systematic integration is a major tool to fight and manage SARS-CoV-2 infection between community health teams, Primary Health Care level and second and third health level, while at the same time allowing access to diagnosis for other diseases.

In Europe, the city of Barcelona holds one of the highest coverage of T. cruzi screening and diagnosis of the migrant Bolivian population. Most of the patients undergo screening and are given a diagnosis at their arrival in the metropolitan area of Barcelona, confirming that the area has a strong and efficient diagnosis and prevention system of CD.

Because of their economic and social characteristics, the prevalence of T. cruzi, SARS-CoV-2 infection and their co-infection among Bolivian nationals in Barcelona is much higher than within the local general population.

Detection of a NTD such as CD is one of the biggest challenges of the implementation of the 2021–2030 WHO roadmap [60]. This study illustrates the benefits of this type of action in the fight against SARS-CoV-2 infection by a multidisciplinary team and rapid diagnosis tests. The lessons learned have shown how to replicate an OSI based on a community-based approach on other similar occasions and in other places.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CD:

Chagas disease

WHO:

World Health Organization

NTD:

Neglected tropical diseases

UTMIHD-VH:

Unit of Tropical Medicine and International Health Drassanes-Vall d’Hebron

eSPiC:

Public Health and Community Team

ASAPECHA:

Asociación de Amigos de las personas afectadas por la enfermedad de Chagas—Associations of Friends of Chagas affected patients

BTBC:

Blood and Tissue Bank of Catalonia

IEC:

Information, education and communication

OSI:

Opportunity of systematic integration

IQR:

Interquartile range

RDT:

Rapid diagnostic test

CHIA:

Chemiluminescence immunoassay

References

  1. Bailey AL, Dmytrenko O, Greenberg L, Bredemeyer AL, Ma P, Liu J, Penna V, Lai L, Winkler ES, Sviben S, Brooks E, Nair AP, Heck KA, Rali AS, Simpson L, Saririan M, Hobohm D, Stump WT, Fitzpatrick JA, Xie X, Shi PY, Hinson JT, Gi WT, Schmidt C, Leuschner F, Lin CY, Diamond MS, Greenberg MJ, Lavine KJ. SARS-CoV-2 infects human engineered heart tissues and models COVID-19 Myocarditis. 2020;5:2020.11.04.364315.

  2. Zaidel EJ, Forsyth CJ, Novick G, Marcus R, Ribeiro ALP, Pinazo MJ, Morillo CA, Echeverría LE, Shikanai-Yasuda MA, Buekens P, Perel P, Meymandi SK, Ralston K, Pinto F, Sosa-Estani S. COVID-19: implications for people with Chagas disease. Glob Heart. 2020;15(1):69.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Nalbandian A, Sehgal K, Gupta A, et al. Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome. Nat Med. 2021;27:601–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Cucinotta D, Vanelli M. WHO declares COVID-19 a pandemic. Acta Biomed. 2020;91(1):157–60.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Logue JK, Franko NM, McCulloch DJ, et al. Sequelae in adults at 6 months after COVID-19 infection. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(2):e210830.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Allotey J, Stallings E, Bonet M, Yap M, Chatterjee S, Kew T, et al. Clinical manifestations, risk factors, and maternal and perinatal outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy: living systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2020;370:3320. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Alberca RW, Yendo TM, Leuzzi Ramos YÁ, Fernandes IG, Oliveira LdM, Teixeira FME, Beserra DR, de Oliveira EA, Gozzi-Silva SC, Andrade MMdS, Branco ACCC, Pietrobon AJ, Pereira NZ, de Brito CA, Orfali RL, Aoki V, Duarte AJdS, Benard G, Sato MN. Case report: COVID-19 and chagas disease in two coinfected patients. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021;103(6):2353–2356. Retrieved Mar 5, 2021, from https://www.ajtmh.org/view/journals/tpmd/103/6/article-p2353.xml

  8. World Health Organization, Department of Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases. Integrating neglected tropical diseases into global health and development: fourth WHO report on neglected tropical diseases. 2017.

  9. Coura JR, Viñas PA. Chagas disease: a new worldwide challenge. Nature. 2010;465(S7301):S6-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Basile L, Jansà JM, Carlier Y, Salamanca DD, Angheben A, Bartoloni A, et al. Chagas disease in European countries: the challenge of a surveillance system. Eurosurveillance. 2011;16(37):19968.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. World Health Organization. Ending the neglect to attain the Sustainable Development Goals: a road map for neglected tropical diseases 2021–2030. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2020; https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240010352.

  12. Liechti M, Baur HR, Gurtner HP, Straub PW. Cardiac complications of American trypanosomiasis (Chagas disease). Various case reports and general observations. Schweizerisc Med Wochensc. 1990;120(41):1493–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pellegrino A. Migration from Latin America to Europe: Trends and Policy Challenges. Prepared for IOM. University of the Republic of Uruguay; 2004.

  14. WHO. (2006). Strategic and technical meeting on intensified control of neglected tropical diseases—Berlin, 18–20 April 2005. A renewed effort to combat entrenched communicable diseases of the por—report of an international workshop. WHO/Department of control of neglected tropical diseases. In: Savioli L, Daumerie D, Languages: English. WHO reference number: WHO/CDS/NTD/2006.1. vi, 46 p.

  15. OPS/MSF. Relatório Técnico: Consulta Técnica Regional OPS/MSF sobre Organização e Estrutura da Atenção Médica do Doente e Infectado por Trypanosoma cruzi/Doença de Chagas Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2005;38 (6):538.

  16. Carlos Chagas. Descoberta do Tripanozoma Cruzi e verificação da Tripanosomiasi Americana. Retrospectivo histórico. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Ano 1922, Tomo XV. Faciculo I. Número commemorativo do Centenario da Independência do Brasil; 1922.

  17. Mathur R, Rentsch CT, Morton CE, Hulme WJ, Schultze A, MacKenna B, et al. Ethnic differences in SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19-related hospitalisation, intensive care unit admission, and death in 17 million adults in England: an observational cohort study using the OpenSAFELY platform. The Lancet. 2021;397(10286):1711–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Uchôa E, Firmo JOA, Dias EC, Pereira MSN, Gontijo ECD. Signs, meanings, and actions associated with Chagas disease. Cad Saude Publica. 2002;18(1):71–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Avaria Saavedra A, Gómez i Prat J. “Si tengo chagas es mejor que me muera”. El desafío de incorporar una aproximación sociocultural a la atención de personas afectadas por Enfermedad de Chagas. Enfermedades Emerg. 2008;10 (S1): 40–5.

  20. Briceño-León R, Méndez GJ. The social determinants of Chagas disease and the transformations of Latin America. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2007;102:109–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. de Oliveira W Jr. Atenção integral ao paciente chagásico: uma proposta para o cuidar. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2005;84(1):1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Velarde-Rodríguez M, Avaria Saavedra A, Gómez i Prat J, Jackson Y, De Oliveira W Jr, Camps-Carmona B, et al. Need of comprehensive health care for T. cruzi infected immigrants in Europe. Rev Soc Brasil Med Trop. 2010;42(Suppl II):92–5.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sanmartino M, Saavedra AA, Prat Gómez i J, Cristina BM, Albajar-Viñas P. Que no tengan miedo de nosotros:el Chagas según los propios protagonistas. Interface (Botucatu). 2015;19(55):1063–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hill J, Rodriguez DX, McDaniel PN. Immigration status as a health care barrier in the USA during COVID-19. J Migr Health. 2021;4:100036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmh.2021.100036.PMID:33778797;PMCID:PMC7979269.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Mariana S, Forsyth CJ, Andrea A, Velarde-Rodriguez M, Gómez i Prat J, Albajar-Viñas P. The multidimensional comprehension of Chagas disease. Contributions, approaches, challenges and opportunities from and beyond the Information, Education and Communication field. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, 2021;16.

  26. Gómez I Prat J, Peremiquel-Trillas P, Claveria Guiu I, Caro Mendivelso J, Choque E, de Los Santos JJ, Sulleiro E, Ouaarab Essadek H, Albajar Viñas P, Ascaso Terren C. Comparative evaluation of community interventions for the immigrant population of Latin American origin at risk for Chagas disease in the city of Barcelona. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(7):e0235466.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Ouaarab Essadek H, Claveria Guiu I, Caro Mendivelso J, Sulleiro E, Pastoret C, Navarro M, Barrabeig I, Gómez I Prat J. Cribado in situ de la enfermedad de Chagas con una intervención comunitaria: ¿puede mejorar la accesibilidad al diagnóstico y al tratamiento? [On site-screening for Chagas disease supported by a community intervention: can it improve accessibility for diagnosis and treatment?]. Gac Sanit. 2017;31(5):439–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2017.04.007 (Spanish).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gómez I Prat J, Peremiquel-Trillas P, Claveria Guiu I, Choque E, Oliveira Souto I, Serre Delcor N, Sulleiro E, Espasa M, Pastoret C, de Los Santos JJ, Ouaarab H, Albajar Viñas P, Ascaso Terren C. A community-based intervention for the detection of Chagas disease in Barcelona. Spain J Community Health. 2019;44(4):704–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Piron M, Vergés M, Muñoz J, Casamitjana N, Sanz S, Maymó RM, Hernández JM, Puig L, Portús M, Gascón J, Sauleda S. Seroprevalence of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in at-risk blood donors in Catalonia (Spain). Transfusion. 2008;48(9):1862–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01789.x (Epub 2008 Jun 2 PMID: 18522707).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Murcia L, Carrilero B, Munoz-Davila MJ, Thomas MC, López MC, Segovia M. Risk factors and primary prevention of congenital Chagas disease in a nonendemic country. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56(4):496–502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Murcia L, Simón M, Carrilero B, Roig M, Segovia M. Treatment of infected women of childbearing age prevents congenital Trypanosoma cruzi infection by eliminating the parasitemia detected by PCR. J Infect Dis. 2017;215(9):1452–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Van Bibber M. It Takes A Community. A resource manual for community-based prevention of fetal alcohol syndrome and fetal alcohol effects. Aboriginal Nurses Association of Canada; 1997.

  33. Angela Cristina Veríssimo Junqueira et al. Manual de capacitación para la detección de Trypanosoma cruzi por los microscopistas del paludismo y los técnicos de laboratório de la red pública. 2 edn, Rio de Janeiro: SCV/ICICT, 2011; xii: 296.

  34. Gómez i Prat J, Morais P, Claret M, Badia P, Fialho RR, Albajar-Vinas P, Villegas L, Ascaso C. Community-based approaches for malaria case management in remote communities in the Brazilian Amazon. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2020.

  35. Pan American Health Organization. EMTCT Plus. Framework for elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV, Syphilis, Hepatitis B, and Chagas. Washington, D.C.: PAHO; 2017. https://www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=13567:paho-launches-new-initiative-to-eliminate-mother-to-child-transmission-of-four-diseases&Itemid=1926&lang=es.

  36. Almeida Eros Antonio de, Ramos Júnior Alberto Novaes, Correia Dalmo, Shikanai-Yasuda Maria Aparecida. Co-infection Trypanosoma cruzi/HIV: systematic review (1980–2010). Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2011; 44(6): 762–770.

  37. WHO. WHO case definitions of HIV for surveillance and revised clinical staging and immunological classification of HIV-related disease in adults and children. WHO Region of the Americas. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. 2007; https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43699. https://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0037-86822011000600021.

  38. Organização Mundial da Saúde. Cuidados inovadores para condições crônicas: componentes estruturais de ação: relatório mundial [Internet]. Brasília: Organização Mundial da Saúde. Disponível em: 2003; http://www.who.int/chp/knowledge/publications/icccportuguese.pdf

  39. Horton R. COVID-19 is not a pandemic. The Lancet. 2020;396(10255):874.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Reason P, Bradbury H. (eds) The Sage Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. Sage, CA. 2008; ISBN 978–1412920292.

  41. Institut d’Estadística de Catalunya. Població estrangera a 1 de gener. Per municipis. http://www.idescat.cat/poblacioestrangera/?b=6&geo=cat&nac=d341.

  42. Claveria Guiu I, Caro Mendivelso J, Ouaarab Essadek H, González Mestre MA, Albajar-Viñas P, Gómez i Prat J. The Catalonian expert patient programme for chagas disease: an approach to comprehensive care involving affected individuals. J Immigr Minor Health. 2017;19(1):80–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Repetto EC, Zachariah R, Kumar A, Angheben A, Gobbi F, Anselmi M, et al. Neglect of a neglected disease in Italy: The challenge of access-to-care for chagas disease in Bergamo. The challenge of access-to-care for chagas disease in Bergamo Area. PLOS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(9):e0004103.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Navarro M, Perez-Ayala A, Guionnet A, Perez-Molina JA, Navaza B, Estevez L, et al. Targeted screening and health education for Chagas disease tailored to at-risk migrants in Spain, 2007 to 2010. Eurosurveillance. 2011;16(38):19973.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Navarro M, Berens-Riha N, Hohnerlein S, Seiringer P, von Saldern C, Garcia S, et al. Cross-sectional, descriptive study of Chagas disease among citizens of Bolivian origin living in Munich, Germany. Br Med J Open. 2017;7(1):e013960.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Avaria A, Gómez i Prat J. Si tengo Chagas es mejor que me muera: el desafío de incorporar una aproximación sociocultural a la atención de personas afectadas por la enfermedad de Chagas. Enferm Emerg. 2008;10:40–5.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Rebecca Martín. Measuring the impact of public health interventions: (almost) as important as the work itself. PhD: August, 21. 2017.

  48. Romay-Barja M, Boquete T, Martinez O, González M, Álvarez-Del Arco D, Benito A, Blasco-Hernández T. Chagas screening and treatment among Bolivians living in Madrid, Spain: the need for an official protocol. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(3):e0213577.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Requena-Méndez A, Aldasoro E, de Lazzari E, Sicuri E, Brown M, Moore DA, Gascon J, Muñoz J. Prevalence of Chagas disease in Latin-American migrants living in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9(2):e0003540.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Pollán M, Pérez-Gómez B, Pastor-Barriuso R, Oteo J, Hernán MA, Pérez-Olmeda M, Sanmartín JL, Fernández-García A, Cruz I, Fernández de Larrea N, Molina M, Rodríguez-Cabrera F, Martín M, Merino-Amador P, León Paniagua J, Muñoz-Montalvo JF, Blanco F, Yotti R, ENE-COVID Study. Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in Spain (ENE-COVID): a nationwide, population-based seroepidemiological study. Lancet. 2020;396(10250):535–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Kapitány-Fövény M, Sulyok M. Social markers of a pandemic: modeling the association between cultural norms and COVID-19 spread data. Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2020;7:97. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00590-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. de Sanidad M. Equidad en Salud y COVID-19. Análisis y propuestas para abordar la vulnerabilidad epidemiológica vinculada a las desigualdades sociales. Madrid, España; 2020.

  53. Person B, Sy F, Holton K, Govert B, Liang A, National enter for Infectious Diseases SCOT. Fear and stigma: the epidemic within the SARS outbreak. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:358–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Tao N. An analysis on reasons of SARS-induced psychological panic among students. J Anhui Inst Educ. 2003;21:78–9.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Cassetti V, López-Ruiz V, Paredes-Carbonell JJ, Grupo de Trabajo del Proyecto AdaptA GPS. Participación comunitaria: mejorando la salud y el bienestar y reduciendo desigualdades en salud. Zaragoza: Ministerio de Sanidad, Consumo y Bienestar Social-Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud. 2018.

  56. Jesús Ramirez. A community-based approach to primary health care. In: Rigg KK, editor. Dimensions of Community-Based Projects in Health Care. University of South Florida. Douglas J Engelman. University of North Carolina at Wilmington. 2018; pp.105–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61557-8_9.

  57. Manteghinejad A, Javanmard SH. Challenges and opportunities of digital health in a post-COVID19 world February 2021. J Res Med Sci. 2021;26(1):11.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Tang Y-W, Schmitz JE, Persing DH, Stratton CW. Laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19: current issues and challenges. J Clin Microbiol. 2020;58:e00512-e520.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Kingdon JW. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston: Little, Brown, 1984; pp. xi + 240.

  60. WHO. Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases. Editors: Dr Malecela Mwelecele Ntuli / Neglected tropical diseases. (2021). Executive summary. Ending the neglect to attain the Sustainable Development Goals: A road map for neglected tropical diseases 2021–2030. WHO/UCN/NTD/2020.01 https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-UCN-NTD-2020.01.

Download references

Acknowledgements

To the patients who participated in the community interventions, to ASAPECHA Barcelona for the community work performed and to all the professionals involved in the in situ intervention and the development of the interviews. The General Consulate of Bolivia for the long lasting collaboration.

Funding

This intervention was partially funded by the NGO Fundación Mundo Sano-España, financing part of the promotional material of the community intervention. The design of the study and the collection, the data analysis and its interpretation has not been funded.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Jordi Gómez i Prat and Pedro Albajar-Viñas are co-authors

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Public Health and Community Team (eSPiC), Unit of Tropical Medicine and International Health Drassanes-Vall d’Hebron (UTMIHD-VH), PROSICS, Servei de Medicina Preventiva, Carrer de Sant Oleguer, 17, 08001, Barcelona, Spain

    Jordi Gómez i Prat, Hakima Ouaarab Essadek, Isabel Claveria Guiu & Estefa Choque

  2. Microbiology Department, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain

    Juliana Esperalba, Francesc Zarzuela Serrat, Lidia Goterris, Tomàs Pumarola & Elena Sulleiro

  3. Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology Department, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain

    Ricardo Zules-Oña & Magda Campins

  4. Asociación de Amigos de las Personas con la Enfermedad de Chagas (ASAPECHA), Barcelona, Spain

    Jordi Gómez i Prat, Hakima Ouaarab Essadek, Isabel Claveria Guiu & Estefa Choque

  5. Departament de Salut, Generalitat de Catalunya, Banc de Sang i Teixits de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain

    Conxita Pastoret & Natàlia Casamitjana Ponces

  6. Fundación Mundo Sano-España, Madrid, Spain

    Juan José de los Santos

  7. Universal Doctor, Barcelona, Spain

    Jordi Serrano Pons

  8. Department of Control of Neglected Tropical Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland

    Aurore Dehousse & Pedro Albajar-Viñas

Authors
  1. Jordi Gómez i Prat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hakima Ouaarab Essadek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Juliana Esperalba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Francesc Zarzuela Serrat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Isabel Claveria Guiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lidia Goterris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ricardo Zules-Oña
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Estefa Choque
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Conxita Pastoret
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Natàlia Casamitjana Ponces
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Juan José de los Santos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Jordi Serrano Pons
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Aurore Dehousse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Pedro Albajar-Viñas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Tomàs Pumarola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Magda Campins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Elena Sulleiro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors have made substantial contributions to conception and design of the intervention and acquisition of data. JGP, HOE, JE, FZS, ICG, LG, EC, CP, JJS, and ES designed the in situ screening intervention. CP in charge of the intervention logistics. JGP, EC, and HO interviewed the participants and collected the interview data. JGP, and HO collected the clinical data. JE, FZS, LG and ES performed the laboratory tests. RZO performed the data analysis. All authors discussed the results obtained and the intervention performed. RZO, AD, JSP and PAV contributed to the interpretation of the results. JGP and PAV wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors have critically revised the intellectual and scientific content of the article. JGP, AD and PAV wrote the final version of the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the submitted manuscript. JGP and PAV are first co-authors of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jordi Gómez i Prat.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and ethical regulations. Vall d’Hebron Hospital Ethics Committee approved the study (PR(AG)371/2019). Prior to participating, all participants received oral information of the intervention prior and gave oral informed consent. For subjects under 16 and illiterate, parents or legal guardians gave oral consent to participate. Participants’ consent was registered in their computerized medical history. All those who consent were actively enrolled in the community action and underwent screening for Chagas disease and COVID-19. Oral consent was accepted by the Vall d’Hebron Hospital Ethics Committee as this intervention was included as regular clinical practice in our center and the intervention was not only performed for research purposes. Thus, this manuscript reports the results derived from regular clinical practice in our center. The screening procedures performed are the ones established and recommended by the WHO. Participants’ data were codified and analyzed anonymously. No data containing personal or identifying information from the participants have been published.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare not having any potential conflict of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gómez i Prat, J., Essadek, H.O., Esperalba, J. et al. COVID-19: an opportunity of systematic integration for Chagas disease. Example of a community-based approach within the Bolivian population in Barcelona. BMC Infect Dis 22, 298 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07305-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07305-6

Keywords

BMC Infectious Diseases

ISSN: 1471-2334

Contact us