Skip to main content

Investigation of the impact of SARS-CoV infection on the immunologic status and lung function after 15 years

Abstract

Background

We investigate the long-term effects of SARS-CoV on patients’ lung and immune systems 15 years post-infection. SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is ongoing however, another genetically related beta-coronavirus SARS-CoV caused an epidemic in 2003–2004.

Methods

We enrolled 58 healthcare workers from Peking University People’s Hospital who were infected with SARS-CoV in 2003. We evaluated lung damage by mMRC score, pulmonary function tests, and chest CT. Immune function was assessed by their serum levels of globin, complete components, and peripheral T cell subsets. ELISA was used to detect SARS-CoV-specific IgG antibodies in sera.

Results

After 15 years of disease onset, 19 (36.5%), 8 (34.6%), and 19 (36.5%) subjects had impaired DL (CO), RV, and FEF25–75, respectively. 17 (30.4%) subjects had an mMRC score ≥ 2. Fourteen (25.5%) cases had residual CT abnormalities. T regulatory cells were a bit higher in the SARS survivors. IgG antibodies against SARS S-RBD protein and N protein were detected in 11 (18.97%) and 12 (20.69%) subjects, respectively. Subgroup analysis revealed that small airway dysfunction and CT abnormalities were more common in the severe group than in the non-severe group (57.1% vs 22.6%, 54.5% vs 6.1%, respectively, p < 0.05).

Conclusions

SARS-CoV could cause permanent damage to the lung, which requires early pulmonary rehabilitation. The long-lived immune memory response against coronavirus requires further studies to assess the potential benefit.

Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03443102. Registered prospectively on 25 January 2018

Peer Review reports

Background

Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) caused by SARS-CoV occurred in China in late 2002 and subsequently spread over the world [1, 2]. Up to September 2003, more than 8000 laboratory-confirmed cases had been documented globally, of which about 30% were severe cases, and 20% were health care workers (HCWs) [3]. At the end of 2019, a new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) emerged and caused an outbreak of pneumonia (now called COVID-19) [4]. The novel coronavirus pneumonia has now spread fast all over the world [5] and has infected approximately 11% HCWs [6]. SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 might cause similar pathological changes since they both invade the alveolar epithelial cells through the ACE-2 receptors [7,8,9]. Both at the SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 in the pulmonary alveolar sac can cause acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) associated with infection of monocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells, and lymphocytes, fluid accumulation in the bronchioles, the release of cytokines, reactive oxygen species, cellular debris, and proteases, further reducing oxygen exchange capacity [10]. In severe COVID-19 infection, the dysregulated immune system responds by secreting cytokines in an uncontrolled manner leading to marked increases in cytokine release, or a “cytokine storm” syndrome [11]. Therefore, we assumed that the long-term effects of SARS-CoV could provide some insight into the impact of COVID-19 on long-term conditions [12]. We investigated the immune system and lung physiology of the patients, 15 years after the SARS-CoV infection Subgroup analyses were conducted to explore the differences between the severe group and the non-severe groups, according to previous severity of illness.

Methods

Study design and participants

Fifty-eight HCWs with confirmed SARS-CoV infection in Peking University People’s Hospital in the 2003 pandemic were enrolled in the study. Diagnose criteria were established by the Chinese Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Fifty-seven of their co-workers, who also had a history of SARS exposure in 2003, were enrolled as controls matched by gender, age, and occupational classifications.

The baseline characteristics and medical histories were collected by a standard questionnaire. The evaluation index system in the study includes the general status, the pulmonary status, and the immunity status. The general status was evaluated by regular laboratory tests including complete blood count (CBC) and blood biochemistry examination. Peripheral blood samples were collected from both SARS cases and controls on empty stomach in the early morning. The pulmonary status was assessed by the dyspnea scale (mMRC), the pulmonary function tests (PTFs), and the chest CT scans. The clinical immunologic evaluations of enrolled subjects included quantitation of serum immunoglobulins (IgA, IgG, and IgM) and complement components (C3 and C4), the WBC count, and differential counts of T lymphocyte subsets. Besides, we conducted serologic tests to see whether there are still detectable IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV after 15 years. The flowchart is shown in Fig. 1. Specific steps for the process are as follows.

Fig. 1
figure1

Flow diagram for study participants

SARS-CoV IgG antibody test

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was performed to detect the IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV in serum. For IgG detection, ELISA plates were coated with purified recombinant SARS protein antigens (S-RBD protein or N protein). Serum samples (diluted 1:160) and negative and positive controls were added to the wells of the coated plates in a total volume of 100 μl, plates were then incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. After five wash steps with washing buffer, 100 μl of diluted HRP-conjugated anti-human IgG antibodies was added to the wells, and samples were incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. After five wash steps with washing buffer, 50 μl of TMB substrate solution and 50 μl of the corresponding buffer were added, and samples were incubated at 37 °C for 10 min. The reaction was terminated by adding 50 μl of 2 M sulfuric acid, and A450 was measured.

Sixteen serum samples from a pneumonia cohort (NCT 03093220) were used as controls to rule out the nonspecific cross-immunoreactivity. Absorbance at 450 nm was measured by ELISA Microplate Reader. The cut-off OD value was calculated as 1.5 times the normal threshold of the controls.

Lung imaging and interpretation

A total of 55 patients underwent lung high-resolution CT (HRCT) examination in March 2018. HRCT was performed by the GE 256-row Revolution scanner with inspiratory and expiratory phases, respectively. The radiological images were reviewed independently by two radiologists and final interpretation was established by consensus, including the following HRCT abnormalities: ground-glass opacity, consolidation, fibrous strip shadow, emphysema, pulmonary bullae, bronchiectasis, and pleural thickening.

Pulmonary function tests (PFTs)

Dyspnea in daily living was evaluated by the mMRC scale. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) included spirometry, plethysmography, diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide were conducted. The main observation indicators included total lung capacity (TLC), residual volume (RV), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), one-second rate (FEV1/FVC), maximum mid-expiratory flow rate 25–75 (FEF25–75), and carbon monoxide diffusion amount [DL (CO)] measured by a single breath test. Values below 80% prediction were regarded as being impaired. RV over 120% predicted and FEF25–75 below 65% predicted as being damaged.

Statistical analysis

All the analyses were performed with the SPSS software, version 22.0, (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) unless otherwise indicated. Continuous variables were expressed as medians (interquartile ranges) or mean ± SD and compared by Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney U tests for normal or non-normal distribution, respectively. Categorical variables were expressed as numbers (proportion). p-values < 0.05 were considered significant.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the ethics committee of Beijing University People’s Hospital (PHB0102018-01) and was registered on the Clinical trials website (https://clinicaltrials.gov/) (NCT03443102). The written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Results

Demographic and clinical features

As shown in Table 1, among the 58 HCWs enrolled in the study, ten were male (17.2%), and the median age was 46 years (IQR 40.0–50.5) up to 2018. The majority of them were nurses who worked in the Emergency Department during the 2003 pandemic. Thirty-five patients were categorized as non-severe pneumonia in 2003, and 23 cases as severe pneumonia. Up to March 2018, most of them (47/58, 81.0%) were still full-time employed. Sixteen of them had hypertension, five had diabetes, and one had Sjogren’s syndrome. Nearly half of the subjects complained of fatigue (27/58, 46.55%). Thirty-nine (39/56, 69.6%) SARS survivors had an mMRC score of 0–1 and 17 subjects (17/56, 30.4%) had 2–3 (Table 2).

Table 1 Demographic data of SARS survivors and controls
Table 2 The lung status of SARS survivors assessed by mMRC score, pulmonary function tests, and chest CT

Immunological features 15 years after recovering from the SARS-CoV pneumonia

The results of CBC and biochemical tests were within the normal range, as well as serum immunoglobulin tests. There was no statistically significant difference among the severe group, the non-severe group, and the control group (p > 0.05). Complement 4 (C4) were a bit higher in the non-severe group, with values of 0.22 ± 0.06, 0.27 ± 0.18 and 0.22 ± 0.06 g/L, respectively, F = 3.547, p = 0.032. (Table 3).

Table 3 Laboratory evaluation of immune status of SARS survivors

T cell subsets were all within normal limits. The percentage of peripheral CD4+ CD25+ Foxp3+ regulatory T cells was slightly higher in the SARS survivors, as compared to the controls (3.85 ± 1.31% vs 3.34 ± 0.97%, respectively, T = 2.420, p = 0.018) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure2

Peripheral T cell subsets between SARS survivors and healthy controls. The proportion of CD4 + (A), CD8 + (B), CD4 + CD25 + (C) and CD4 + CD25 + Foxp3 + regulatory T cells (D) between SARS survivors and healthy controls

The serum antibody test results of SARS survivors showed that SARS-CoV N protein IgG antibody and S-RBD protein IgG antibody were positive in 11 (18.97%) and 12 (20.69%), respectively (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure3

SARS-CoV specific IgG antibodies in serum after 15 years of infection. ELISA results of Specific IgG antibody against SARS N protein (A) and against S-RBD protein (B). S-RBD receptor binding domain of spike protein, N protein nuclear protein

Lung imaging results

CT abnormalities including ground-glass opacities, interstitial fibrosis, emphysema, bullae, and pleural thickening were observed in 14 SARS survivors, mostly (12/14, 85.6%) in the severe group. The most common abnormal lung radiologic findings were ground-glass opacities, detected in 8 (57.1%) cases. Seven cases presented with interstitial fibrosis. Less common changes included emphysema, bullae, and pleural thickening, and none of the survivors showed pleural effusion. We compared longitudinal series of chest CT in some cases of the severe group, and the abnormalities remained relatively stable 1 year after the disease onset. Dynamic CT changes of a patient in the severe group were shown in Fig. 4.

Fig. 4
figure4

Serial CT images of a male SARS survivor in 15 years. A Showed diffused consolidation in bilateral lungs on June 14, 2003. BD Showed a stable reticular interstitial fibrosis with tractive bronchiectasis in the serial follow-up, after 1 year (B, November 2004), 3 years (C, August 2006) and 15 years (D, March 2018) of SARS pneumonia

Pulmonary function tests

Pulmonary function tests including spirometry, lung volume and diffusion capacities proceeded in 52 subjects. One severe case had moderate impairment of FVC (1/52, 1.92%), and no one showed restrictive ventilatory dysfunction. The FEF25–75% decreased in 19 patients (36.54%) with the mean (SD) 75.93 ± 21.57%. Diffusion capacity was impaired in 19 patients (36.54%), and the lowest was 62.2% of predicted values.

FEV1, FEV1/FVC and FEF25–75% were lower in the severe group than that in the non-severe group (FEV12.48 ± 0.514% vs 2.90 ± 0.453L, FEV1/FVC 79.23 ± 4.35% vs 82.64 ± 4.80%, FEF25–75% 65.95 ± 19.73% vs 82.69 ± 20.36%, p = 0.003, 0.012, and 0.005, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in lung diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide between the two groups (84.01 ± 11.06% vs 82.18 ± 12.42%, p = 0.576). All the results of PFTs are provided in Table 2.

Discussion

We investigated the current status of convalescent SARS patients to find out whether there is any long-term effect of SARS-CoV infection. In our study, most cases have continued to normal operation as expected. The majority of PFT values, cellular and humoral immune parameters are within the normal range. However, cases in the severe group revealed poor lung function than cases in the non-severe group, including small airway function (FEF25–75%) and diffuse capacity [DL (CO)]. Plus the persistent CT abnormalities, our study indicated that SARS-CoV can cause permanent damage to the lung, especially in critically ill patients. Besides, the high percent of Treg cells in peripheral blood and the durability of serum antibodies indicate a persistent immune memory to SARS-CoV in both T- and B- cells. However, whether it is a virus-specific protective immune response requires further exploration.

Our study found that the pulmonary functions of SARS survivors largely returned to normal after 15 years of convalescence, most of them (81.03%) were still full-time employed, and 69.6% had an mMRC scale score of 0–1. The lung function damage was characterized by small airway abnormalities (36.5%) and reduced diffusion capacity (36.5%). Previous studies evaluating the lung function status [13, 14] in SARS survivors observed consistent results with our study. The impairment of DL (CO) was significant in all studies, which suggests impairment in the intra-alveolar diffusion pathway. Airway obstruction and small airway dysfunction were less common in the studies. In our study, small airway dysfunction was as common as damaged diffusion capacity. Survivors from severe COVID-19 also revealed small airway dysfunction [15, 16]. As previously reported, the predominant pathological finding in SARS was diffuse alveolar damage in the early phase of the disease [17] but in the later course of the disease, dense septal and alveolar fibrosis were seen [18]. Recently report demonstrated that the COVID-19 virus particles could be observed in distal airway mucosal epithelial through electron microscopy [19]. Therefore, bronchiolitis may exist and result in dysfunction of the small airway.

No statistical differences in the pulmonary function measurements were observed in the longitudinal studies [13, 14], as compared with those measured either immediately after recovery or after 24 months post-illness. These results are in accord with our study, which showed persistent CT abnormalities in SARS convalescent patients. Besides, we previously reported that the CT abnormalities remained stable after 24 months post-infection [20]. These data suggested permanent lung damage due to coronavirus and indicated the necessity of early respiratory rehabilitation training.

We also found that approximately 20% of SARS convalescent patients still have a detectable level of serum IgG specific to SARS-CoV, with 20.69% positive to S-RBD protein and 18.97% positive to N protein, which was not related to the disease severity. These findings are somewhat surprising given the fact that other researches have shown that SARS-CoV-specific antibodies waned over time [21] and SARS-CoV-specific IgG antibodies could not be detected in more than 90% of patients six years after infection [22]. The researchers have reported long-lived SARS-CoV-specific memory T cells but not B cells in SARS survivors. SARS-CoV reactive CD4 + T cells could be detected even 17 years after infection [23]. Our data indicated the existence of virus-specific memory B cells in the peripheral blood, which could still be activated to secret IgG up to 15 years post-infection. An improved detection threshold might explain the different results. Further evidence is required to validate whether the antibodies can confer protection against SARS-CoV, or even better, cross-protection against COVID-19.

Besides, we observed a slight elevation of Treg cells in peripheral blood in SARS survivors after 15 years, as compared with healthy controls (3.85 ± 1.31% vs 3.34 ± 0.97%). The values were still within the normal range and no clinical features were observed to be related to the higher proportion of Treg cells, including the disease severity. However, the autoimmune characteristics have been observed in critical COVID-19 cases [24], and autoimmune and inflammatory diseases were observed following COVID-19 as well [25]. It is well known that Treg-mediated active maintenance of self-tolerance is the pathogenetic mechanism of autoimmune diseases [26]. Although the connections between SARS and autoimmune or inflammatory diseases were not reported, the cross-reaction of SARS-CoV antigen with autoantibodies had already been observed as early as 2004 [27]. In addition to this, Treg cells can also limit pulmonary immunopathology in respiratory virus infections [28]. And in West Nile infection, Tregs can protect from central nervous system immunopathology by controlling CD8 T-cell responses [29]. Brandon Malone etc. had recently revealed the diversity of the immunogenic landscape of SARS-CoV-2 among the different HLA groups [30]. The exact role of Treg cell reaction to coronavirus infection might need to be further explored.

There are several limitations to this study. First, although this study had the largest sample size for an evaluation of the long-term effects of SARS, we failed to make serial assessments over 15 years. This limitation means that study findings need to be interpreted cautiously. Further comparisons over time would be required to verify the observations. Second, although full lung function tests were conducted in our study, we did not perform 6MWT or cardiopulmonary exercise testing to verify their exercise capacities, as a great part of our cases were complaining of fatigue when questioned. The results might therefore not be representative of the entire cohort, especially those with normal DL (CO). Additional factors such as muscle deconditioning and steroid myopathy should be considered in further studies.

Conclusions

In summary, more than 30% of SARS survivors had impaired DL (CO) and over 30% of them had small airway dysfunction 15 years after SARS onset. CT abnormalities remained in over 20% of SARS subjects. SARS can lead to persistent lung abnormalities in survivors. Health authorities should provide more support for early pulmonary rehabilitation. The long-lived immune memory response requires further research to assess the potential beneficial immunity against coronavirus.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ACE2:

Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2

CoV:

Coronavirus

DIC:

Disseminated intravascular coagulation

DLCO:

Diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide of the lung

DLCO/VA:

Diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide of the lung/Alveolar volume

ELISA:

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

FEF25–75% :

Forced expiratory flow between 25 and 75% of forced vital capacity

FEV1 :

Forced expiratory volume in one second

FEV1/FVC%:

Forced expiratory volume in one second/Forced vital capacity

FVC:

Forced vital capacity

GGO:

Ground-Glass opacity

HCWs:

Health care workers

HRCT:

High-resolution computerized tomography

HRQoL:

Health-related quality of life

RT-PCR:

Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction

RT-PCR:

Real-time PCR

RV:

Residual volume

SARS:

Severe acute respiratory syndrome

TLC:

Total lung capacity

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. 1.

    Lee N, Hui D, Wu A, Chan P, Cameron P, Joynt GM, Ahuja A, Yung MY, Leung CB, To KF, et al. A major outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(20):1986–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Tsang KW, Ho PL, Ooi GC, Yee WK, Wang T, Chan-Yeung M, Lam WK, Seto WH, Yam LY, Cheung TM, et al. A cluster of cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(20):1977–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    WHO: http://www.who.int/csr/sars/country/2003_08_15/en/.

  4. 4.

    Andersen KG, Rambaut A, Lipkin WI, Holmes EC, Garry RF. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2. Nat Med. 2020;26(4):450–2.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Sohrabi C, Alsafi Z, O’Neill N, Khan M, Kerwan A, Al-Jabir A, Iosifidis C, Agha R. World Health Organization declares global emergency: a review of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19). Int J Surg. 2020;76:71–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Gómez-Ochoa SA, Franco OH, Rojas LZ, Raguindin PF, Roa-Díaz ZM, Wyssmann BM, Guevara SLR, Echeverría LE, Glisic M, Muka T. COVID-19 in health-care workers: a living systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence, risk factors, clinical characteristics, and outcomes. Am J Epidemiol. 2021;190(1):161–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Wen Z, Lu J, Li J, Li N, Zhao J, Wang J, Yu L, Yang W. Determining the filtration efficiency of half-face medical protection mask (N99) against viral aerosol. Aerobiologia. 2010;26(3):245–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Seyran M, Takayama K, Uversky VN, Lundstrom K, Palù G, Sherchan SP, Attrish D, Rezaei N, Aljabali AAA, Ghosh S, et al. The structural basis of accelerated host cell entry by SARS-CoV-2†. FEBS J. 2020;288(17):5010–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Seyran M, Pizzol D, Adadi P, El-Aziz TMA, Hassan SS, Soares A, Kandimalla R, Lundstrom K, Tambuwala M, Aljabali AAA, et al. Questions concerning the proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2. J Med Virol. 2021;93(3):1204–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Machhi J, Herskovitz J, Senan AM, Dutta D, Nath B, Oleynikov MD, Blomberg WR, Meigs DD, Hasan M, Patel M, et al. The natural history, pathobiology, and clinical manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 infections. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2020;15(3):359–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Fajnzylber J, Regan J, Coxen K, Corry H, Wong C, Rosenthal A, Worrall D, Giguel F, Piechocka-Trocha A, Atyeo C, et al. SARS-CoV-2 viral load is associated with increased disease severity and mortality. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):5493.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Yang Y, Peng F, Wang R, Yange M, Guan K, Jiang T, Xu G, Sun J, Chang C. The deadly coronaviruses: the 2003 SARS pandemic and the 2020 novel coronavirus epidemic in China. J Autoimmun. 2020;109:102434.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Li L, Sun X, Wu Q, Wu Q, Xing Z, Yu H. The lung function status in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome after ten years of convalescence in Tianjin. Zhonghua jie he he hu xi za zhi Zhonghua jiehe he huxi zazhi Chin J Tuberculosis Respir Dis. 2015;38(8):575–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ngai JC, Ko FW, Ng SS, To KW, Tong M, Hui DS. The long-term impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome on pulmonary function, exercise capacity and health status. Respirology (Carlton, Vic). 2010;15(3):543–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    You J, Zhang L, Ni-Jia-Ti M-Y-d-L, Zhang J, Hu F, Chen L, Dong Y, Yang K, Zhang B, Zhang S. Anormal pulmonary function and residual CT abnormalities in rehabilitating COVID-19 patients after discharge. J Infect. 2020;81(2):e150–2.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Li X, Wang C, Kou S, Luo P, Zhao M, Yu K. Lung ventilation function characteristics of survivors from severe COVID-19: a prospective study. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Lam C, Lauder I, Lam T, Gandek B. Population based norming of the Chinese (HK) version of the SF-36 health survey. Hong Kong Practitioner 1999.

  18. 18.

    Gu J, Korteweg C. Pathology and pathogenesis of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Am J Pathol. 2007;170(4):1136–47.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Yao X, Li T, He Z, Ping Y, Liu H, Yu S, Mou H, Wang L, Zhang H, Fu W. A pathological report of three COVID-19 cases by minimally invasive autopsies. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi Chin J Pathol. 2020;49:E009–E009.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Zhang P, Li J, Liu H, Han N, Ju J, Kou Y, Chen L, Jiang M, Pan F, Zheng Y. Long-term bone and lung consequences associated with hospital-acquired severe acute respiratory syndrome: a 15-year follow-up from a prospective cohort study. Bone Res. 2020;8(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Xie L, Liu Y, Xiao Y, Tian Q, Fan B, Zhao H, Chen W. Follow-up study on pulmonary function and lung radiographic changes in rehabilitating severe acute respiratory syndrome patients after discharge. Chest. 2005;127(6):2119–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Tang F, Quan Y, Xin ZT, Wrammert J, Ma MJ, Lv H, Wang TB, Yang H, Richardus JH, Liu W, et al. Lack of peripheral memory B cell responses in recovered patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome: a six-year follow-up study. J Immunol. 2011;186(12):7264–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Swadling L, Maini MK. T cells in COVID-19—united in diversity. Nat Immunol. 2020;21(11):1307–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Zhou Y, Han T, Chen J, Hou C, Hua L, He S, Guo Y, Zhang S, Wang Y, Yuan J. Clinical and autoimmune characteristics of severe and critical cases of COVID-19. Clin Transl Sci. 2020;13(6):1077–86.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Galeotti C, Bayry J. Autoimmune and inflammatory diseases following COVID-19. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2020;16(8):413–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Sakaguchi S, Sakaguchi N. Regulatory T cells in immunologic self-tolerance and autoimmune disease. Int Rev Immunol. 2005;24(3–4):211–26.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Wang Y, Sun S, Shen H, Jiang L, Zhang M, Xiao D, Liu Y, Ma X, Zhang Y, Guo N, et al. Cross-reaction of SARS-CoV antigen with autoantibodies in autoimmune diseases. Cell Mol Immunol. 2004;1(4):304–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Loebbermann J, Durant L, Thornton H, Johansson C, Openshaw PJ. Defective immunoregulation in RSV vaccine-augmented viral lung disease restored by selective chemoattraction of regulatory T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013;110(8):2987–92.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Lanteri MC, O’Brien KM, Purtha WE, Cameron MJ, Lund JM, Owen RE, Heitman JW, Custer B, Hirschkorn DF, Tobler LH. Tregs control the development of symptomatic West Nile virus infection in humans and mice. J Clin Investig. 2009;119(11):3266–77.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Malone B, Simovski B, Moline C, Cheng J, Gheorghe M, Fontenelle H, Vardaxis I, Tennoe S, Malmberg JA, Stratford R, et al. Artificial intelligence predicts the immunogenic landscape of SARS-CoV-2 leading to universal blueprints for vaccine designs. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):22375.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the following colleagues who have offered tremendous help in this study: Yan Yu and Yu Xie.

Funding

The work was funded by grants from the National Key Research and Development Program “Precision Medicine Research” from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2016YFC0903800), the Emergency Scientific Research Project of Novel Coronavirus Prevention and Control from Xiamen University (20720200017, 20720200032).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ZG had the idea for and designed the study and had full access to all data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. JL and YZ contributed equally to the drafting of the manuscript. ZG, JL and YZ contributed to the critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. JL and YZ contributed to the statistical analysis. JL, YZ, ZY, FP, BY and YC contributed to the data acquisition. YZ, YC, GZ and YZ contributed to the SARS-CoV specific antibodies detection. JL, YZ and LZ contributed to the T lymphocyte subsets analysis. JL, YZ, BY, YC, FP, LZ, YZ and ZG contributed to data analysis or data interpretation. The final version had been reviewed and approved by all authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhancheng Gao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the ethics committee of Beijing University People’s Hospital (PHB0102018-01). The written informed consent was obtained from all participants. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, J., Zheng, Y., Zhao, L. et al. Investigation of the impact of SARS-CoV infection on the immunologic status and lung function after 15 years. BMC Infect Dis 21, 1183 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06881-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)
  • SARS-CoV specific IgG antibody
  • Regulatory T cell
  • HRCT
  • Pulmonary function test