Skip to main content
Download PDF

Efficacy of two-week therapy with doxycycline-based quadruple regimen versus levofloxacin concomitant regimen for helicobacter pylori infection: a prospective single-center randomized controlled trial

BMC Infectious Diseases volume 21, Article number: 642 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Antibiotic-resistance reduces the efficacy of conventional triple therapy for Helicobacter Pylori infections worldwide, which necessitates using various treatment protocols. We used two protocols, doxycycline-based quadruple regimen and concomitant levofloxacin regimen. The aim was to assess the effectiveness of doxycycline-based quadruple regimen for treating Helicobacter Pylori infections compared with levofloxacin concomitant regimen as empirical first-line therapy based on intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol analyses (PPA) in Syrian population.

Settings and design

An open-label, randomised, parallel, superiority clinical trial.

Methods

We randomly assigned 78 naïve patients who tested positive for Helicobacter Pylori gastric infection, with a 1:1 ratio to (D-group) which received (bismuth subsalicylate 524 mg four times daily, doxycycline 100 mg, tinidazole 500 mg, and esomeprazole 20 mg, each twice per day for 2 weeks), or (L-group) which received (levofloxacin 500 mg daily, tinidazole 500 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, and esomeprazole 20 mg each twice per day for two weeks). We confirmed Helicobacter Pylori eradication by stool antigen test 8 weeks after completing the treatment.

Results

Thirty-nine patients were allocated in each group. In the D-group, 38 patients completed the follow-up, 30 patients were cured. While in the L-group, 39 completed the follow-up, 32patients were cured. According to ITT, the eradication rates were 76.92%, and 82.05%, for the D-group and L-group respectively. Odds ratio with 95% confidence interval was 1.371 [0.454–4.146]. According to PPA, the eradication rates were 78.9%, and 82.05% for the D-group and L-group respectively. The odds ratio with 95% confidence interval was 1.219 [0.394–3.774]. We didn’t report serious adverse effects.

Conclusions

Levofloxacin concomitant therapy wasn’t superior to doxycycline based quadruple therapy. Further researches are required to identify the optimal first-line treatment for Helicobacter-Pylori Infection in the Syrian population.

Trial registration

We registered this study as a standard randomized clinical trial (Clinicaltrial.gov, identifier-NCT04348786, date:29-January-2020).

Peer Review reports

Background

Eastern Mediterranean region countries have a high prevalence rate of Helicobacter Pylori (H.Pylori) infection [1]. Chronic infection of H. pylori contributes to multiple diseases such as peptic ulcer disease and subsequent bleeding [2,3,4], dyspepsia, gastric adenocarcinoma [5], mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma [6], idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura [7], and unexplained iron deficiency anaemia [8]. World health organization has listed the H.Pylori infection as a class 1 carcinogen [9]. Eradication of H.Pylori cures previous diseases and can decrease the risk of gastric cancer [10]. Eradication rate of H. pylori infection is declining globally due to increased antibiotic resistance particularly clarithromycin and levofloxacin [11]. In the eastern Mediterranean area, the resistance to clarithromycin, metronidazole, levofloxacin, amoxicillin, and tetracycline were 29%, 61%, 23%, 14%, 10% respectively [12]. Several researchers reviewed many therapeutic regimens including sequential, concomitant, and hybrid to find the best treatment protocol [13]. The results of conventional triple therapy in Syria were disappointing [14]. Currently tetracycline is unavailable in Syria, so we used doxycycline in the bismuth quadruple regimen [15, 16]. Although tinidazole isn’t superior to metronidazole in treating Helicobacter Pylori infections [17], we used tinidazole instead of metronidazole in both regimens, as H. pylori had high metronidazole resistance rate [18]. Metronidazole is a commonly overused drug in Syria, mainly prescribed for gynaecological and gastrointestinal diseases [19] Besides, tinidazole (b.i.d) is more tolerable by patients. There is a lack of data about the efficacy of doxycycline-based quadruple regimen and levofloxacin-containing quadruple concomitant regimen in Syrian patients, we conducted this trial to evaluate the efficacy and report the eradication rate of these regimens according to Intention-to-treat analysis (ITT) and per-protocol analysis (PPA).

Methods

This was a prospective single-center open-label parallel randomized superiority controlled clinical trial. It was conducted at gastroenterology department, Damascus hospital, Syria. We recruited appropriate candidates from patients who visited our clinic for evaluation of dyspeptic symptoms by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy between February 2020 and August 2020. Exclusion criteria were (1) younger than 18 years and older than 80 years; (2) prior eradication treatment for H pylori; (3) documented reactions to any of the studied medications;(4) recent use of antibiotics, bismuth, or proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in the preceding month; (5) pregnant or lactating women; (6) previous gastric surgery; (7) alcohol or opioid abuse; and (8) severe concurrent medical illnesses, such as liver failure, renal failure, or terminal malignancy.

H. pylori detection

All patients have undergone upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopists have taken five gastric biopsies; two from the antrum, two from the body, and one from the incisura according to the Sydney system [20]. Pathologists confirmed H. pylori infection by microscopic examination after using haematoxylin, eosin, and Giemsa stains [21]. We sent all biopsies to the central pathological laboratory of the same referral hospital.

Intervention

Eligible patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive 2 weeks of treatment of either doxycycline-based regimen (D-group) or concomitant levofloxacin regimen (L-group). The D-group obtained bismuth subsalicylate 524 mg q.i.d, doxycycline 100 mg, tinidazole 500 mg, esomeprazole 20 mg each b.i.d for 14 days. While the L-group obtained levofloxacin 500 mg q.d, tinidazole 500 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, and esomeprazole 20 mg each b.i.d for 14 days. The indication of treatment relied on the American College of gastroenterology guideline and Maastricht V/Florence consensus report [13, 15] including peptic ulcer, chronic gastritis, primary gastric MALT lymphoma, intestinal metaplasia, dyspepsia, and unexplained iron deficiency anaemia.

We used a Microsoft Excel function called (RANDBETWEEN) to generate a sequence of two randomized numbers, number one referred to the D-group, and number two referred to the L-group. We printed each code on separate paper, inserted it into sealed opaque envelopes in unchanged order, and hold it in a secure locker belonging to an independent medical staff member. After obtaining informed consent, the independent medical staff member took the top envelope to assign the patient to the treatment regimen. We provided all patients with written instructions considering medication dosage. We evaluated compliance by counting the number of unused medications and considered that the patient was complaint if he/she had taken at least 90% of the assigned treatment protocol.

At the end of the treatment course, patients revisited the clinic to investigate side effects and evaluate compliance. We reported side effects such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, melena, dysgeusia, and anorexia. After 8 weeks, all patients visited the central laboratory of our hospital and undergone stool antigen tests by using the enzyme immunoassay method (EIA) [22]. Medical laboratory workers were blinded to the treatment arm. Qualified physician collected the data in a questionnaire including (1) participants’ demographics; (2) smoking history; (3) medication history; (4) adverse events, and (5) results of stool antigen test. Numerical data were shown as mean, and qualitative data were expressed as a ratio.

Authors reported the results according to the CONSORT.

Outcomes

This study aims to assess the effectiveness of doxycycline-based quadruple regimen for treating Helicobacter Pylori infections compared with levofloxacin concomitant regimen.

Sample size and statistical analysis

We reviewed English medical literature for Helicobacter Pylori doxycycline-based therapy and found a systematic review authored by Niv [16] .There aren’t new studies yet. We reviewed the studies within it and found that nine clinical trials excluded bismuth, two clinical trials replaced proton pump inhibitors with ranitidine, and two clinical trials used different doxycycline therapeutic protocol (LOND: levofloxacin, omeprazole, nitanoxanide, and doxycycline) [23]. The remaining two studies: Borody TJ et al. reported the eradication rate of doxycycline based therapy as first line treatment and it was 0.65 [24],while Wang et al. reported the eradication rate of doxycycline based therapy as second-line treatment based on ITT, It was 0.6744 [25]. Those results were close and we chose the highest eradication rate. Federico et al. found that the eradication rate based on ITT was 0.922% in concomitant levofloxacin-containing therapy [26]. To find if concomitant levofloxacin-containing regimen was more effective than doxycycline-based regimen we conducted a clinical trial with superior study design. We used a power (1-β) of 80%, two tails test and significance level (α) equal to 5%, with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Each treatment arm required 37 patients [27]. We added two patients to each group to compensate for the predicted dropout [28, 29].

Statistical tests: Chi-square test (χ2 -test) for categorical variables, and t-test for continuous data. We reported the odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval. A P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. We performed statistical analyses using SPSS (IBM Corp. Released in 2017. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp).

Results

We collected 226 patients diagnosed with H. pylori infection confirmed by biopsy. Seventy-eight treatment-naive patients were enrolled in this study (39 patients for each group), only one patient in D-group didn’t complete the follow-up. [Fig. 1 and Table 1] summarizes the flow chart and baseline characteristics of the patients. The gender, mean age and pharmacological side effects were similar among treatment groups, except for melena, which occurred more frequently in the D-group.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow of the study

Full size image
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients
Full size table

H. pylori infection was eradicated in 30 patients from the D-group, and 32 patients from the L-group. Table 2 summarised the eradication rates according to ITT and PPA analysis. We didn’t report serious adverse effects.

Table 2 Helicobacter pylori eradication rate
Full size table

Discussion

Researchers globally observe a decline in the rate of H pylori eradication following standard triple therapies, thus requiring a search for new therapeutic approaches [45–48]. This randomized clinical trial included 78 patients from an area of high prevalence (>15%) of clarithromycin and levofloxacin resistant helicobacter pylori strains [1, 12, 14, 30, 31]. Both concomitant and bismuth-containing quadruple therapies are recommended as alternative first-line treatment according to the previously mentioned guidelines, particularly in regions with a high prevalence of clarithromycin resistance [13, 15].

The eradication rate for levofloxacin concomitant protocol was 82.05% according to ITT analysis, while doxycycline-based therapy had a PPA eradication rate of 78.94%, and 76.92% according to ITT analysis. The overall eradication rate of levofloxacin concomitant was about 3% higher than doxycycline-based therapy but the difference didn’t reach statistical significance. The result of levofloxacin containing therapy can be regarded as Grade D standard, while the result of bismuth-containing therapy can be regarded as Grade F as proposed recently [32]. The former results are better than our preceding study outcomes regarding the treatment of H. pylori [14]. Our results are agreeing with a meta-analysis by Essa et al. and similar research by Federico et al. Both studies showed that concomitant therapy is effective in the eradication of H.Pylori [26, 33]. Similarly, meta-analysis by Niv et al. found that the Doxycycline-based quadruple regimen had good efficacy in the treatment of Helicobacter Pylori infection [16] .Even though this research treated patients for a longer period [34], our results didn’t show the effectiveness mentioned in previous studies, this may be due to the existence of Helicobacter Pylori resistant strains [35]. Antibiotics are overused,especially macrolides and fluoroquinolones, for treating respiratory, urinary and gynaecological infections [36,37,38]. Chokshi et al. reported that the main contributors of emerging antibiotic resistance in developing countries are clinical mismanagement, antibiotics availability, poor quality of available antibiotics, and insufficient surveillance of resistance development [39]. We checked compliance by counting remaining pills which raised suspicions about outpatient incompliance to antibiotic regimens [40,41,42].

Our study has a few limitations (1) The only method to investigate medication history was to interrogate patients. Electronic medical were lacking, The patient was considered “naïve” if he/she wasn’t previously treated for H. pylori infection ;(2) We depended on patients to evaluate the compliance ;and (3) We didn’t perform a susceptibility test of H. pylori to antibiotics, because it’s unavailable in Syria.

This study showed that both regimens had an acceptable rate of eradication, and the difference didn’t reach statistical significance. These results were highly promising in treating H. pylori infection in Syria.

Conclusion

The success rate of the standard triple therapy with clarithromycin or levofloxacin has declined substantially due to increasing antimicrobial resistance. (ACG) Clinical guideline and Maastricht Consensus recommended alternative regimens, including bismuth-containing quadruple therapy or non-bismuth concomitant therapy, as first-line therapies, particularly in areas with a high prevalence of clarithromycin resistance like Syria. Levofloxacin concomitant therapy wasn’t superior to doxycycline based quadruple therapy, we didn’t record any serious adverse event in both regimens. We encourage further researches to determine the optimal first-line empirical therapy for Helicobacter-Pylori Infection in the Syrian population.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is available for free in the [data.mendeley.com] repository, [https://data.mendeley.com/drafts/fzv77yzshx], and it will be available after 15 September 2021 to 15 September 2023.

Abbreviations

PPA:

Per-protocol analysis

ITT:

Intention to treat analysis

q.i.d.:

Four times a day

b.i.d.:

Twice a day

q.d:

Once a day

ACG:

American College of Gastroenterology

H. pylori :

Helicobacter Pylori

PPI:

Proton pump inhibitors

References

  1. Hooi JKY, Lai WY, Ng WK, Suen MMY, Underwood FE, Tanyingoh D, et al. Global prevalence of helicobacter pylori infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2017;153(2):420–9. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2017.04.022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Peterson WL. Helicobacter pylori and peptic ulcer disease. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(15):1043–8. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199104113241507.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Caselli M, Alvisi V. Helicobacter pylori and peptic-ulcer disease. Lancet. 2002;359(9321):1943–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08746-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Henriksson AE, Edman AC, Held M, Wadström T. Helicobacter pylori and acute bleeding peptic ulcer. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1995;7(8):769–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ishaq S, Nunn L. Helicobacter pylori and gastric cancer: a state of the art review. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2015;8(Suppl 1):S6–14.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Wotherspoon AC. Gastric MALT lymphoma and helicobacter pylori. Yale J Biol Med. 1996;69(1):61–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim BJ, Kim HS, Jang HJ, Kim JH. Helicobacter pylori eradication in idiopathic thrombocytopenic Purpura: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2018;2018:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6090878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Monzón H, Forné M, Esteve M, Rosinach M, Loras C, Espinós JC, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection as a cause of iron deficiency anaemia of unknown origin. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(26):4166–71. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i26.4166.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Schistosomes, liver flukes and Helicobacter pylori. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Lyon, 7–14 June 1994. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 1994;61:1–241.

  10. Helicobacter pylori Eradication to Prevent Gastric Cancer in a High-Risk Region of China: A Randomized Controlled Trial | Gastroenterology | JAMA | JAMA Network. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/197985. Accessed 4 Jul 2020.

  11. Ghotaslou R, Leylabadlo HE, Asl YM. Prevalence of antibiotic resistance in helicobacter pylori: a recent literature review. World J Methodol. 2015;5(3):164–74. https://doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v5.i3.164.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Savoldi A, Carrara E, Graham DY, Conti M, Tacconelli E. Prevalence of Antibiotic Resistance in Helicobacter pylori: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis in World Health Organization Regions. Gastroenterology. 2018;155:1372–82 e17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Malfertheiner P, Megraud F, O’Morain CA, Gisbert JP, Kuipers EJ, Axon AT, et al. Management of Helicobacter pylori infection—the Maastricht V/Florence consensus report. Gut. 2017;66(1):6–30. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312288.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cheha KM, Dib SOA, Alhalabi MM. Pilot study: comparing efficacy of 14-day triple therapy clarithromycin versus levofloxacin on eradication of helicobacter pylori infection in Syrian population single-center experience. Avicenna J Med. 2018;8(1):14–7. https://doi.org/10.4103/ajm.AJM_70_17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Chey WD, Leontiadis GI, Howden CW, Moss SF. ACG clinical guideline: treatment of helicobacter pylori infection. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017;112. https://journals.lww.com/ajg/Fulltext/2017/02000/ACG_Clinical_Guideline__Treatment_of_Helicobacter.12.aspx(2):212–39. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2016.563.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Niv Y. Doxycycline in eradication therapy of helicobacter pylori--a systematic review and meta-analysis. Digestion. 2016;93(2):167–73. https://doi.org/10.1159/000443683.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Berrutti M, Pellicano R, Astegiano M, Smedile A, Saracco G, Morgando A, et al. Helicobacter pylori eradication: metronidazole or tinidazole? Data from Turin, Italy. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol. 2008;54(4):355–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Moshkowitz M, Konikoff FM, Peled Y, Brill S, Hallak A, Tiomny E, et al. One week triple therapy with omeprazole, clarithromycin and tinidazole for helicobacter pylori: differing efficacy in previously treated and untreated patients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1996;10(6):1015–9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2036.1996.96268000.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hart CA, Kariuki S. Antimicrobial resistance in developing countries. BMJ. 1998;317(7159):647–50. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7159.647.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Satoh K, Kimura K, Taniguchi Y, Kihira K, Takimoto T, Saifuku K, et al. Biopsy sites suitable for the diagnosis of helicobacter pylori infection and the assessment of the extent of atrophic gastritis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;93(4):569–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.1998.166_b.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee JY, Kim N. Diagnosis of helicobacter pylori by invasive test: histology. Ann Transl Med. 2015;3. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2014.11.03.

  22. Veijola L, Myllyluoma E, Korpela R, Rautelin H. Stool antigen tests in the diagnosis of helicobacter pylori infection before and after eradication therapy. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11(46):7340–4. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v11.i46.7340.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Basu PP, Rayapudi K, Pacana T, Shah NJ, Krishnaswamy N, Flynn M. A randomized study comparing levofloxacin, omeprazole, Nitazoxanide, and doxycycline versus triple therapy for the eradication of helicobacter pylori. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106(11):1970–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2011.306.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Borody TJ, George LL, Brandl S, Andrews P, Lenne J, Moore-Jones D, et al. Helicobacter pylori eradication with doxycycline-metronidazole-bismuth subcitrate triple therapy. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1992;27(4):281–4. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365529209000075.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang Z, Wu S. Doxycycline-based quadruple regimen versus routine quadruple regimen for rescue eradication of helicobacter pylori: an open-label control study in Chinese patients. Singap Med J. 2012;53(4):273–6.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Federico A, Nardone G, Gravina AG, Iovene MR, Miranda A, Compare D, et al. Efficacy of 5-day levofloxacin-containing concomitant therapy in eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:55–61 e1; quize e13–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhong B. How to calculate sample size in randomized controlled trial? J Thorac Dis. 2009;1(1):51–4.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Gupta K, Attri J, Singh A, Kaur H, Kaur G. Basic concepts for sample size calculation: critical step for any clinical trials! Saudi J Anaesth. 2016;10(3):328–31. https://doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.174918.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Sakpal TV. Sample size estimation in clinical trial. Perspect Clin Res. 2010;1:67.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Eshraghian A. Epidemiology of helicobacter pylori infection among the healthy population in Iran and countries of the eastern Mediterranean region: a systematic review of prevalence and risk factors. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(46):17618–25. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i46.17618.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Kuo Y-T, Liou J-M, El-Omar EM, Wu J-Y, Leow AHR, Goh KL, et al. Primary antibiotic resistance in helicobacter pylori in the Asia-Pacific region: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;2(10):707–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(17)30219-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Graham DY, Lu H, Yamaoka Y. A report card to grade helicobacter pylori therapy. Helicobacter. 2007;12(4):275–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-5378.2007.00518.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Essa AS, Kramer JR, Graham DY, Treiber G. Meta-analysis: four-drug, three-antibiotic, non-bismuth-containing “concomitant therapy” versus triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK); 2009. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK77292/. Accessed 4 Sep 2020.

  34. Yuan Y, Ford AC, Khan KJ, Gisbert JP, Forman D, Leontiadis GI, Tse F, Calvet X, Fallone C, Fischbach L, Oderda G, Bazzoli F, Moayyedi P. Optimum duration of regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(12):CD008337.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008337.pub2.

  35. Haddadi M-H, Negahdari B, Asadolahi R, Bazargani A. Helicobacter pylori antibiotic resistance and correlation with cagA motifs and homB gene. Postgrad Med. 2020;:1–4l.

  36. Levy SB, Star L, Kupferberg ED. The misuse of antibiotice. Medical Ethics (Burlington, Mass). 2004;11:5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Schroeck JL, Ruh CA, Sellick JA, Ott MC, Mattappallil A, Mergenhagen KA. Factors associated with antibiotic misuse in outpatient treatment for upper respiratory tract infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59(7):3848–52. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00652-15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Giono-Cerezo S, Santos-Preciado JI, Morfin-Otero MDR, Torres-Lopez FJ, Alcantar-Curiel MD. Antimicrobial resistance. Its importance and efforts to control it. Gac Med Mex. 2020;156(2):171–8. https://doi.org/10.24875/GMM.M20000358.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Chokshi A, Sifri Z, Cennimo D, Horng H. Global contributors to antibiotic resistance. J Global Infect Dis. 2019;11(1):36–42. https://doi.org/10.4103/jgid.jgid_110_18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kardas P. Patient compliance with antibiotic treatment for respiratory tract infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002;49(6):897–903. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkf046.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Grob PR. Antibiotic prescribing practices and patient compliance in the community. Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1992;83:7–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Eells SJ, Nguyen M, Jung J, Macias-Gil R, May L, Miller LG. Relationship between adherence to Oral antibiotics and Postdischarge clinical outcomes among patients hospitalized with Staphylococcus aureus skin infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60(5):2941–8. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.02626-15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not Applicable.

Priprint

https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-250381/v1

DOI:https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-250,381/v1

Funding

Not Applicable, None. No funding to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Gastroenterologist at Damascus Hospital, Almujtahed street, Damascus, Syria

    Marouf Alhalabi, Mohammed Waleed Alassi, Kamal Alaa Eddin & Khaled Cheha

Authors
  1. Marouf Alhalabi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohammed Waleed Alassi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kamal Alaa Eddin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Khaled Cheha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Marouf Alhalabi established the conceptualization, wrote the main manuscript text, prepared (Tables 1 and 2) and performed statistics. Mohammed Waleed Alassi wrote the main manuscript text,collected data, Kamal Alaa Eddin prepared Fig. 1, (Tables 1 and 2). Khaled Cheha executed supervision. All authors had reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marouf Alhalabi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

All experimental protocols were approved by the Ethical Committee of the general assembly of Damascus Hospital (Approval No:5–30–12-19).

Written informed consent was obtained from all patients or their legally authorized representatives. If the patient is under 18, the informed consent was obtained from a parent and/or legal guardian. It was clearly stated that only clinical information will be shared in research, without mentioning any personal details at any part of the article.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alhalabi, M., Alassi, M.W., Alaa Eddin, K. et al. Efficacy of two-week therapy with doxycycline-based quadruple regimen versus levofloxacin concomitant regimen for helicobacter pylori infection: a prospective single-center randomized controlled trial. BMC Infect Dis 21, 642 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06356-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06356-5

Keywords

  • Helicobacter pylori
  • Doxycycline
  • Tinidazole
  • Bismuth
  • Quadruple regimen
  • Levofloxacin
  • Syria

BMC Infectious Diseases

ISSN: 1471-2334

Contact us