Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Molecular characteristics of HBV infection among blood donors tested HBsAg reactive in a single ELISA test in southern China

BMC Infectious Diseases volume 21, Article number: 83 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a major concern for blood safety in high-prevalence HBV countries such as China. In Shenzhen, dual hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) have been adopted in parallel with nucleic acid testing (NAT) for donors for over a decade. A small proportion of blood donors test reactive (R) for HBsAg but negative through routine NAT, which can lead to HBV infection with an extremely low viral load.

Objectives

We aimed to investigate and analyze the molecular characteristics of HBV among blood donors that tested HBsAg R in a single ELISA test.

Methods

Blood donations were evaluated in this study if confirmed HBsAg R through one of two ELISA kits. Samples with non-reactive (NR) results by NAT were collected and tested for HBsAg by chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CLIA) with a neutralization test. The level of HBsAg was further assessed by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA). The viral basic core promoter (BCP) and pre-core (PC) and S regions were amplified by nested PCR. Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) for viral load determination and individual donation (ID)-NAT were adopted simultaneously. HBsAg was confirmed with CLIA, ECLIA, nested PCR, qPCR, and ID-NAT.

Results

Of the 100,252 donations, 38 and 41 were identified as HBsAg R with Wantai and DiaSorin ELISA kits, respectively. Seventy-nine (0.077%, 79/100,252) blood samples with ELISA R-NR and NAT NR results were enrolled in the study. Of these, 17 (21.5%,17/79) were confirmed as HBsAg-positive. Of the 14 genotyped cases, 78.6% (11/14) were genotype B, and C and D were observed in two and one sample, respectively. Mutations were found in the S gene, including Y100C, Y103I, G145R, and L175S, which can affect the detection of HBsAg. A high-frequency mutation, T1719G (93.3%), was detected in the BCP/PC region, which reduced the viral replication.

Conclusion

A small number of blood samples with HBsAg ELISA R-NR and NAT NR results were confirmed as HBV infection, viral nucleic acids were found in most of the samples through routine NAT methods. It is necessary to employ more sensitive and specific assays for the detection of HBV infection among blood donors.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

According to the blood screening strategies in China, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) screening using two different enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits and a nucleic acid test (NAT) are employed for hepatitis B virus (HBV) screening to ensure blood safety for future transfusions. Blood donations are considered suitable for clinical blood transfusions when all three tests yield negative results. However, inconsistencies between HBsAg and HBV DNA results have been reported for 6–9% of blood donations [1]. Previously, we found that of 307,740 seronegative blood samples, 80 were classified as occult HBV infection (OBI), characterized by HBsAg non-reactive (NR) and NAT reactive (R) [2].

Another consideration is HBsAg R and NAT NR results. More specifically, blood with HBsAg ELISA R-NR and NAT NR results may place recipients at risk of HBV transmission, due to the extremely low levels of HBsAg and HBV DNA, respectively. Previous studies have shown that mutations in the S region and basic core promoter (BCP) and pre-core (PC) of HBV can affect the detection of HBsAg and viral nucleic acid [3, 4].

To accurately determine the presence of HBV infection in blood donors, we conducted blood screening for HBV DNA and HBsAg using ELISA, chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CLIA), and electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA). Furthermore, quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) and nested PCR were performed to investigate the molecular characteristics of HBV with low viral loads among blood donors that tested HBsAg R in a single ELISA test, and to identify the potential molecular mechanisms underlying this mode of HBV infection.

Materials and methods

Study samples

Between February 2017 and February 2018, a total of 100,252 blood donations from Shenzhen Blood Center underwent HBsAg testing using two different ELISA kits (Beijing Wantai Biological Pharmacy, Beijing, China; DiaSorin, Saluggia, Italy), and HBV DNA using the Procleix Ultrio Plus Assay (Grifols, Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Inc. Spain; 0.5 mL, LOD: 3.4 IU/mL), of which 363 (0.36%, 363/100,252) donors with HBV reactive results were found, including 221 HBsAg ELISA R-R, 63 ELISA NR-NR and NAT R, and 79 HBsAg ELISA R-NR/NAT NR. All 79 samples with ELISA R-NR and NAT NR results were investigated in this study.

HBsAg confirmation

All samples with HBsAg ELISA R-NR and NAT NR results underwent HBsAg confirmatory testing; samples evaluated in the study were subjected to HBsAg screening using CLIA (ARCHITECT HBsAg Reagent Kit, Abbott Ireland Diagnostics Division Finisklin Business Park, Sligo, Ireland) and ECLIA (Elecsys HBsAg II, Roche Diagnostic GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). Then, samples with CLIA HBsAg reactive results were subjected to a neutralization test using a kit provided by the same manufacturer (Abbott). Following CLIA and ECLIA testing, samples were further tested for HBV DNA using standard methods (qPCR and nested PCR) [5, 6]. In addition, individual donation NAT (ID-NAT) (Cobas TaqScreen MPX Test, version 2.0, Roche Diagnostic GmbH, Mannheim, Germany; 1.0 mL, LOD, 2.3 IU/mL) was used for the detection of HBV DNA. HBsAg-positive results were confirmed by reactivity in CLIA and/or ECLIA, as well as any reactive results in qPCR, nested PCR, and ID-NAT [7].

Viral nucleic acid was extracted from 2.5 mL plasma using the HighPure Viral Nucleic Acid Large Volume Kit (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany), and nested PCR was performed to amplify the BCP/PC regions (263 bp) and S-fragment (496 bp) as previously described [6]. The nested PCR products were purified and subjected to Sanger sequencing by Shenzhen BGI Technology Co., Ltd. Following nucleic acid extraction, the viral load of HBV was determined using qPCR [5]. The confirmation algorithm is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The study route, R: reactive, NR: non-reactive, Wantai: Diagnostic Kit for Hepatitis B Virus Surface Antigen (ELISA), Sorin: Murex HBsAg version3, NAT-Roche: Cobas TaqScreen MPX Test, version 2.0, NAT-Grifols: Procleix Ultrio Plus Assay, CLIA: ARCHITECT HBsAg Reagent Kit, ECLIA: Elecsys HBsAg II

Full size image

HBV phylogenetic analysis and mutations in the BCP/PC and S regions

The sequences were aligned and compared with HBV reference sequences of genotype A-I (accession numbers are shown in Fig. 2) using the BioEdit program. Nucleotide alignments (S region) were used to build a phylogenetic tree for HBV subtyping by MEGA software using the neighbor-joining algorithm based on the Kimura 2-parameter model for 1000 bootstrap replicates. The mutations in the BCP/PC and S regions were analyzed and described in a previous study [6]. We matched the amino acid sequences of blood donors with the reference sequences and calculated the frequency of amino acid mutations.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Phylogenetic tree analysis of S region sequences among 14 HBV isolates in blood donors

Full size image

Statistical analysis

Demographic data were obtained from the donor/donation database from the blood center. SPSS 21.0 software was used for statistical analysis.

Results

HBsAg confirmation and demographic characteristics of blood donors

Among the 79 blood samples with HBsAg ELISA R-NR and NAT NR results in initial tests, 17 (21.5%, 17/79) were confirmed as HBsAg-positive (Fig. 1). Wantai (ELISA) reported 38 reactive results (S/CO range: 1–21.89, median: 1.58) and DiaSorin (ELISA) reported 41 reactive results (S/CO range: 1–6.87, median: 1.23). Of the HBsAg-positive samples, the median HBsAg titer was 1.55 IU/mL, and only two samples were below the LOD (0.05 IU/mL) of HBsAg in the ECLIA. All 17 HBsAg-positive samples were NAT R. Detectable viral load was reported for 14 of the 79 (17.7%) samples, including 5 of 10–100 IU/mL, 7 of 100–1000 IU/mL, and 2 over 1000 IU/mL viral load, after the qPCR test. The viral load ranged between 2649.5 IU/mL and 12 IU/mL (median, 128.5 IU/mL; Table 1). Of the 17 HBsAg-positive samples with NR results for initial NAT screening (Grifols), 14 (82.4%) and 16 (94.1%) were detected by qPCR and MPX ID-NAT (Roche), respectively.

Table 1 Initial screening and confirmatory tests of HBsAg and demographic characteristics
Full size table

Most HBsAg-positive patients (64.7%, 11/17) were 18–35 years old and first-time blood donors (58.8%, 10/17). Nearly half of the blood donors were female (47.1%; Table 1).

HBV genotype classification

The S fragments of 14 samples were successfully sequenced. A phylogenetic tree of the S sequence of HBV was constructed using MEGA software based on the Kimura-2 parameter model with 1000 bootstrap replicates (Fig. 2). Eleven cases (78.5%, 11/14) of HBV-B, two cases (14.3%, 2/14) of HBV-C, and one case (7.1%, 1/14) of HBV-D were identified among the 14 isolates.

Mutations in S and BCP/CP sequences

A total of 32 mutations in the S sequence were observed in 13 blood donors. As shown in Table 2, 45.5% (5/11, 45.5%) S regions in 11 HBV-B isolates had N40S mutations. Several mutations associated with the interference of HBsAg detection, such as mutations in the major hydrophilic region (MHR), including Q129H, T131I, M133L/S/T, F134L, T143M, and G145R, and mutations outside the MHR, including Y100C, L175S, and Y103I, were found in S genes among HBV-infected blood donors. In addition, immune escape mutants containing Q129H, T131I/T, G145R, and E164V were also found in these S sequences.

Table 2 Mutation analysis in S and BCP/PC sequences
Full size table

Twenty-one mutations were identified in the core upstream regulatory sequence (nt1678–1741) from 16 samples, and T1719G occurred in 93.8% (15/16) samples. The most common mutations in the BCP region (nt1742–1849) and pre-C region were A1752G and A1846T. The A1762T and G1764A mutations were found in two cases. In addition, two insertion mutations were observed in nt1847 and nt1915 (insertion of base C).

Discussion

HBV infection remains a major threat to public health and blood safety. In China, approximately 50% of the individuals have a history of HBV infection, and 7.2% are chronic carriers of HBsAg [8]. HBsAg and HBV DNA screening were implemented among blood donors to decrease the risk of HBV transmission through blood transfusion [9]. Complicated infectious modes, such as OBI, HBsAg ELISA R-NAT NR, and ELISA R for HBV-associated markers, have been reported in Shenzhen blood donors [7, 10]. The occurrence of such complications restricts the reliability of HBV detection in China. Notably, samples with HBsAg ELISA R-NR and NAT NR results may have a risk of HBV transmission, due to the low levels of HBsAg and HBV DNA. Due to the blood screening protocol in China, limited data on the molecular diversity and mutation analysis of HBV in blood donors is currently available. Hence, we investigated the molecular characteristics of HBV in blood donors that were missed by initial NAT screening but detected as HBsAg ELISA R-NR through two different ELISA kits.

In this study, 79 samples with HBsAg ELISA R-NR and NAT NR results were found in 100,252 blood donations. After a series of confirmatory tests, of which 17 of 79 (21.9%) samples were confirmed as HBsAg-positive, accounting for 0.017% (17 of 100,252) of the overall sample pool (95%CI: 0.0097–0.026%). A previous study reported that 10% of blood samples with HBsAg ELISA R-NR results were transferred to ELISA R-R results after follow-up studies [11], and HBV DNA was detected in 13.3% (4/30) of such ELISA R-NR samples using qPCR [12], which was lower than that in our results (21.9%). This discrepancy may be due to manufacturer differences.

Seventeen samples were missed by one of the two ELISA kits, but most of them were detected by CLIA (16) and ECLIA (15). Currently, ELISA is the only serological assay approved for HBV blood screening in China. Automated CLIA and ECLIA have been used in clinical laboratories but not for HBV screening among blood donors. Furthermore, of the 17 HBsAg-positive samples with NR results for initial NAT screening (Grifols), most HBV infections were detected by nested PCR (16) and qPCR (14). Previously, we identified 14 OBI patients (HBsAg ELISA NR and NAT R) out of 490 donors, who tested ELISA reactive for hepatitis B core antibodies (HBcAb), after the application of more sensitive assays [13]. Hence, more sensitive serological and NAT assays are needed for blood screening.

In addition to the different capabilities available for HBV detection, HBV genetic diversity and various mutations should be considered when investigating inconsistencies in HBV screening assays. The majority of HBV-positive blood donors in this study were genotype B (11/13, 84.6%), which is similar to our previous report in Shenzhen in 2015 (14/15, 93.3%) [8]. A nationwide survey reported that HBV-B was predominant in the southern areas of China [14]. Genotype D is mainly found in the Mediterranean region and in certain Asian countries [15]. One genotype D strain observed in our study highlights that increased international travel and immigration may have contributed to the input of the epidemic.

HBV is prone to mutations in various gene regions. Typically, mutations in the HBsAg region can cause immune escape, resulting in the failure to detect HBsAg [16]. Furthermore, HBV immune escape mutants are highly contagious and pathogenic in immunodeficient patients [17]. In vivo studies have found that certain mutations in the S region of HBV can lead to reduced, or even inhibited, secretion of viral particles, and reduced HBsAg synthesis [18]. Mutations in the MHR and non-MHR in the S region, such as Y100C, Y103I, Q129H, T131I, M133L/S/T, F134L, T143M, G145R, and L175S, were found in this study, and could reduce the affinity of monoclonal antibodies for “a” epitopes by altering the structure of HBsAg protein [19], which may contribute to the failure of commercial reagents.

Mutations in the BCP/PC region can regulate the secretion of the hepatitis e antigen (HBeAg), leading to the cessation of antigen production. Typically, BCP mutations (A1762T and G1764A) can reduce the mRNA synthesis of the pre-C region, which is reflected as a very low level of HBV DNA [20]. G1896A is another typical mutation in the pre-C region, which generates a stop codon at the 28th amino acid position of the HBeAg sequence, resulting in the inhibition of protein synthesis [21]. These three mutations in the BCP/PC region found in this study are closely associated with the development of hepatocellular carcinoma [20]. Fifteen cases of T1719G mutations in the BCP/PC region were identified in 16 samples in the present study, which can inhibit in vitro HBV replication [22], and may lead to a low HBV DNA viral load.

It is worth noting that among the 17 samples with HBV infection, two samples (ID: 83, 97) had high viral loads (> 1000 IU/mL) detected by qPCR, but were reported as NR in routine NAT testing (Grifols). The N40S mutation in the S region was identified in both samples. Whether this has an impact on NAT requires further investigation. Some studies have reported false-negative results and underestimated viral load among blood donors with HBV infection using various commercial kits [23, 24]. Therefore, NAT with two targets in different gene regions is recommended to avoid mismatch due to possible mutations.

In summary, we analyzed the molecular characteristics of HBV among blood donors using routine ELISA R-NR and NAT NR results. Most positive cases were identified by CLIA and ECLIA, as well as qPCR and nested PCR. Analysis of the S gene sequence revealed a large number of mutations, which are associated with disrupting HBsAg detection. Some mutations in the BCP/PC regions were identified in this study, which may lower the viral load of HBV DNA and cause false-negative NAT results. Our results highlight the need to improve the sensitivity of HBsAg screening and NAT methods, to aid in the detection of low HBV viral loads and mutated HBV strains.

Availability of data and materials

The data for this study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Candotti D, Boizeau L, Laperche S. Occult hepatitis B infection and transfusion-transmission risk. Transfus Clin Biol. 2017;24(3):189–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ye X, Yang B, Zhu W, Zheng X, Du P, Zeng J, Li C. Six-year pilot study on nucleic acid testing for blood donations in China. Transfus Apher Sci. 2013;49(2):318–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang L, Chang L, Laperche S, Ji H, Zhao J, Jiang X, Wang L, Candotti D. Occult HBV infection in Chinese blood donors: role of N-glycosylation mutations and amino acid substitutions in S protein transmembrane domains. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2019;8(1):1337–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zuccaro O, Romanò L, Mele A, Mariano A, Clementi M, Tosti ME, Taliani G, Galli C, Zanetti AR, Spada E. Clinical, epidemiological and virological features of acute hepatitis B in Italy. Infection. 2015;43(4):431–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Enjalbert F, Krysztof DE, Candotti D, Allain JP, Stramer SL. Comparison of seven hepatitis B virus (HBV) nucleic acid testing assays in selected samples with discrepant HBV marker results from United States blood donors. Transfusion. 2014;54(10):2485–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Candotti D, Opare-Sem O, Rezvan H, Sarkodie F, Allain JP. Molecular and serological characterization of hepatitis B virus in deferred Ghanaian blood donors with and without elevated alanine aminotransferase. J Viral Hepat. 2006;13(11):715–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ye X, Li T, Zhang R, Liu H, Zeng J, Hong W, Lu L, Zhu W, Li S, Xu M, et al. Comprehensive analysis of hepatitis B virus infections in blood donors in southern China that are surface antigen positive but nucleic acid testing negative. Transfusion. 2020;60(7):1476–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zheng X, Ye X, Du P, Zeng J, Zhu W, Yang B, Li C, Allain JP. High prevalence of anti-hepatitis B core antigen in hepatitis B virus-vaccinated Chinese blood donors suggests insufficient protection but little threat to the blood supply. Transfusion. 2015;55(4):890–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Godbey EA, Thibodeaux SR. Ensuring safety of the blood supply in the United States: Donor screening, testing, emerging pathogens, and pathogen inactivation. Seminars Hematol. 2019;56(4):229–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ye X, Li T, Shao W, Zeng J, Hong W, Lu L, Zhu W, Li C, Li T. Nearly half of Ultrio plus NAT non-discriminated reactive blood donors were identified as occult HBV infection in South China. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19(1):574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu Y. Follow-up study of blood donors with gray area or single reagent positive by ELISA. Laboratory Med Clinic. 2016;13(2):274–5.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Huang X. HBV infection in donors with different HBsAg ELISA results by two kits. Chinese J Exper Clinical Virology. 2015;029(003):236–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ye X, Li T, Xu X, Du P, Zeng J, Zhu W, Yang B, Li C, Allain JP. Characterisation and follow-up study of occult hepatitis B virus infection in anti-HBc-positive qualified blood donors in southern China. Blood Transfusion. 2017;15(1):6–12.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Li HM, Wang JQ, Wang R, Zhao Q, Li L, Zhang JP, Shen T. Hepatitis B virus genotypes and genome characteristics in China. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(21):6684–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ozaras R, Inanc Balkan I, Yemisen M, Tabak F. Epidemiology of HBV subgenotypes D. Clinics Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2015;39(1):28–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ma Q, Wang Y. Comprehensive analysis of the prevalence of hepatitis B virus escape mutations in the major hydrophilic region of surface antigen. J Med Virol. 2012;84(2):198–206.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gerlich WH, Wagner FF, Chudy M, Harritshoj LH, Dickmeiss E. HBsAg non-reactive HBV infection in blood donors: Transmission and pathogenicity. J Med Virol. 2007;79(S1):S32–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kalinina T, Riu A, Fischer L, Will H, Sterneck M. A dominant hepatitis B virus population defective in virus secretion because of several S-gene mutations from a patient with fulminant hepatitis. Hepatology. 2001;34(2):385–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Scheiblauer H, Soboll H, Nick S. Evaluation of 17 CE-marked HBsAg assays with respect to clinical sensitivity, analytical sensitivity, and hepatitis B virus mutant detection. J Med Virol. 2006;78(Suppl 1):S66–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lazarevic I. Clinical implications of hepatitis B virus mutations: recent advances. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(24):7653–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Suppiah J, Mohd Zain R, Bahari N, Haji Nawi S, Saat Z. G1896A Precore Mutation and Association With HBeAg Status, Genotype and Clinical Status in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B. Hepat Mon. 2015;15(10):e31490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jiao F, Shen C, Ning J, Zhang T, Chen X, Lu F. HBV T1719G mutation reduced HBV replication through mutant Enh II and HBx protein in vitro. J Viral Hepat. 2019;26(6):710–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu C, Chang L, Wang L. HBV DNA Test Among Blood Donations May Require Two Amplification Targets. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2019;35(3):544–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu C, Chang L, Jia T, Guo F, Zhang L, Ji H, Zhao J, Wang L. Real-time PCR assays for hepatitis B virus DNA quantification may require two different targets. Virol J. 2017;14(1):94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Dr. Li Ling of the Chengdu Blood Transfusion Institute of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences for making important amendments to this article.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from Shenzhen Natural Science Foundation (JCYJ20190806112201646) and Shenzhen Key Medical Discipline Construction Fund (SZXK070).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Shenzhen Blood Center, Meigang South Road, Shenzhen, 518000, P. R. China

    Xianlin Ye, Tong Li, Ran Li, Heng Liu, Junpeng Zhao & Jinfeng Zeng

  2. Department of Transfusion, 2nd Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Jiefang Load 88, Hangzhou, 310000, P. R. China

    Junpeng Zhao

Authors
  1. Xianlin Ye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tong Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ran Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Heng Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Junpeng Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jinfeng Zeng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JZ1 and JZ2 were co-corresponding authors. XY and JZ1 designed the study. TL, RZ, RL conducted the laboratory tests. XY, HL, and JZ2 collected and analyzed data and prepared the manuscript. XY, JZ1 and JZ2 edited and reviewed the manuscript. All Authors critically reviewed and revised the manuscript drafts, approved the final version of the manuscript and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and accuracy of data analysis.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Junpeng Zhao or Jinfeng Zeng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee in Shenzhen blood center. The methods in the study were in accordance with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects participating in this research.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ye, X., Li, T., Li, R. et al. Molecular characteristics of HBV infection among blood donors tested HBsAg reactive in a single ELISA test in southern China. BMC Infect Dis 21, 83 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-05747-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-05747-4

BMC Infectious Diseases

ISSN: 1471-2334

Contact us