Skip to main content
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Amygdalin promotes the activity of T cells to suppress the progression of HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma via the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway

Abstract

Background

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a high-risk factor of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Cellular immune responses are essential for HCC development, and the CD4+ and CD8+ T subtypes are identified as the primary anti-tumor immune cells. In the study, we investigated the effect and mechanism of amygdalin in the cellular immune response in HBV-related HCC and HCC progression.

Methods

The cell proliferation was examined by MTT analysis. Cells metastasis ability was detected by Invasion and migration assays. Quantification of apoptotic cells was performed with Flow cytometer assay. The protein levels of p-STAT3, STAT3, p-JAK2, JAK2, caspase-3, cleaved caspase-3 were detected by performing immunoblotting assays.

Results

We demonstrate that amygdalin treatment could rescue the HBV-T cell viability and IFN-γ and TNF-αproduction. In HBV-T cells, the MFI levels of CD8+ are lower than that in NC-T cells. Moreover, the phosphorylation levels of STAT3 and JAK2 are higher in HBV-T cells, compared to those in NC-T cells, and then reduced by amygdalin treatment. Co-culture with HBV-T cells could reduce IFN-γ and TNF-α, production while increase IL-6 and IL-10 production in HepG2.2.15 cells; these alterations could be partially reversed by amygdalin pretreatment. Finally, co-culture with HBV-T cells significantly promoted the cell viability, inhibited the apoptosis, and promoted the migration of HepG2.2.15 cells, and these alterations could be partially reversed by amygdalin treatment.

Conclusion

Our findings provide a rationale for further studies on the functions and mechanism of amygdalin inhibiting HBV-related HCC cell proliferation, invasion, and migration via T cell-mediated tumor immunity.

Peer Review reports

Background

As one of the most common types of cancer in Asia, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be caused and affected by a variety of risk factors, including hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections [1,2,3]. Higher levels of serum HBV DNA can be directly related to a higher risk of hepatocarcinogenesis [4].

Cellular immune responses are essential for the monitoring of malignant tumors and the control of HCC development; CD4+ and CD8+ T subtypes are identified as the primary anti-tumor immune cells [5]. The cytotoxicity mediated by HBV-specific CD8+ T subtype is not only strong and effective, but also critical for controlling HBV infection and affecting cancer progression [6]. CD4+ T subtype-mediated cytotoxicity, which is essential for virus control and anti-tumor immunity [7, 8], has attracted increasing attention in recent years. However, in hepatocellular carcinoma, the number of circulating and tumor-infiltrating T cells is increased at early stages while reduced at later stages [9].

Cytokines, growth factors, and oncogenes can induce signal transduction mediated by STAT transcription factors. Among them, the signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) are one of the most essential members [10]. Phosphorylated STAT3 (p-STAT3) leads to tumor progression in a variety of cancers, such as lung cancer [11], breast cancer [12], prostate cancer [13], and melanoma [14]. The tumorigenesis, invasion, and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma are also related to STAT3 activation [15, 16]. Interestingly, increased p-STAT3 expression in the CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in peripheral blood of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma can lead to aberrant immunological surveillance, thus promoting the development of hepatocellular carcinoma [17].

Amygdalin was one of the most popular, non-conventional, anti-cancer treatments in the 1970s when over 70, 000 cancer patients were treated with amygdalin [18]. During the past decades, amygdalin is well known for its antitumor [19,20,21,22,23] and anti-inflammatory activities [24,25,26,27]. Amygdalin attenuates acute liver injury induced by D-galactosamine and lipopolysaccharide by regulating the NLRP3, NF-κB, and Nrf2/NQO1 signaling pathways [24]. Via inhibiting lipopolysaccharide-inducible TNF-α and IL-1β mRNA expression, Amygdalin could suppress carrageenan-induced rat arthritis [25]. Amygdalin significantly reduced LPS-induced inflammatory cell infiltration and the production of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) in LPS-induced acute lung injury model in murine [26]. However, the effect and mechanism of amygdalin in the cellular immune response in HBV-related HCC and HCC progression remain unclear.

Herein, we examined how amygdalin affected the proliferation of normal T cell (NC-T), and HBV-related HCC T cell (HBV-T) and the production of cytokines were determined. STAT3 and JAK2 phosphorylation in NC-T and HBV-T cells were detected with or without amygdalin treatment. Finally, we co-cultured HepG2.2.15 cells with T cells (directly/indirectly) and examined the production of cytokines, cell proliferation, apoptosis, migration, and invasion. In summary, we revealed the cellular functions of amygdalin on HBV-related HCC cells and provided a solid experimental basis for understanding the underlying mechanism.

Methods

Isolation and purification of human peripheral blood T lymphocytes

Fifty milliliters of peripheral blood was drawn from healthy volunteers (n = 10, F/M is 4/6, age is 55.6 ± 10.14 year) or patients diagnosed with HBV-related HCC (n = 10, F/M is 3/7, age is 59.3 ± 11.00 year). The general characteristics of voluneers and patients were shown in Table S1. The patients with HCV, HIV-coinfection, diabetes, chronic kidney diseases or autoimmune disorders were excluded from the study. PBMCs were harvested by density gradient centrifugation, washed 3 times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and cultured in RPMI1640 medium at 37 °C in 5% CO2 for 2 h. After that, the medium was changed to remove macrophages. PBMCs were routinely cultured in RPMI1640 medium containing 10 IU/ml rhIL-2 for 4 weeks, incubated with fluorescently labeled antibody to label PBMCs, and then maintained at a low dose of rhIL-2. Total T lymphocyte numbers and T cell subpopulations were detected by Flow cytometry analysis. T lymphocytes were identified with surface markers, CD3, CD4, and CD8. CD3 represents the total number of T cells, and CD4 and CD8 represent T cell subsets. Purified T lymphocytes are collected according to the analysis results of flow cytometry.

HepG2.2.15 cells, which are capable of steady secreting HBsAg, HBeAg and intact Dane particles to the culture supernatant, were obtained from SHANGHAI CAFA BIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD and cultured in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% FBS.

Co-culture experiments

For the co-culture experiments with T cells, HepG2.2.15 cells were seeded in 96 or 24-well flat-bottom plates at a density of 5 × 104 cells/ml. After co-cultured with T cells (5 × 105 cells/ml) for 24, 48 or 72 h, T cells were removed, and HepG2.2.15 cells viability, apoptosis and migration ability was assessed.

Amygdalin treatment

Amygdalin was purchased from Macklin (Shanghai, China). T cells were treated with 5, 10, 15 or 20 μg/ml amygdalin for 24, 48 and 72 h or treated with 10 μg/ml amygdalin for 48 h, T cells were collected for further experiments.

MTT assay

The cell proliferation was examined by MTT analysis. For T cell proliferation, T cells were stimulated with 5 μg/ml concanavalin A (Con A, Sigma-Aldrich, USA), 1 × 104 cells/well T cells were seeded into 96 well plates treated with or without amygdalin for 24, 48 and 72 h. For HepG2.2.15 cells proliferation, 5 × 103 cells/well HepG2.2.15 cells were co-cultured with 5 × 104 cells/well T cells into 96 well plates for 24, 48 and 72 h, then removed the T cells. Twenty microliters MTT (at a concentration of 5 mg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich) was added into the 96-well plates and incubated for 4 h in a humidified incubator. After that, the supernatant was discarded and 200 μl DMSO was added to dissolve the formazan. OD490 nm value was measured. The viability of the non-treated cells (control) was defined as 100%.

Real-time PCR

Total RNA was extracted from targeted cells using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, CA, USA), and the expression of mRNA was determined using PCR-based analyses following the methods described previously [28]. SYBR green PCR Master Mix (Qiagen, German) was used. GAPDH was employed as endogenous controls for mRNA expression determination, respectively. The data were processed using a 2-ΔΔCT method. The primer sequence were listed in Table S2.

Immunoblotting analysis

The protein levels of p-STAT3, STAT3, p-JAK2, and JAK2 were detected by performing immunoblotting assays. Target cells were lysed in RIPA buffer with 1% PMSF; proteins were loaded onto an SDS-PAGE minigel and transferred onto a PVDF membrane. The blots were probed with anti-p-STAT3 (dilution 1:2000, ab76315, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), anti-STAT3 (dilution 1:2000, ab119352, Abcam), anti-p-JAK2 (dilution 1:2000, ab32101, Abcam), anti-JAK2 (dilution 1:2000,ab108596, Abcam), anti-procaspase3 (dilution 1:1000, ab32150, Abcam), anti-cleaved caspase-3 (dilution 1:1000, ab32042, Abcam) and anti-GAPDH (dilution 1:5000, ab8245, Abcam) at 4 °C overnight, subsequently incubated with the HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (15,000, Santa Cruz, USA). ECL Substrates was used to visualize signals (Millipore, MA, USA). GAPDH was used as an endogenous protein for normalization.

Cytokines production determined by ELISA

T cells culture medium was collected for ELISA assay using ELISA kits specific for IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10 according to the manufacturer’s instructions (R&D systems, USA). First, 100 μl of Assay Diluent was added to each well. One hundred microliters serially-diluted standard samples or supernatant samples were added into the microplate and were incubated at room temperature for 2 h. After aspirating each well and washing, 200 μl of Conjugate solution to each well and incubated at room temperature for 2 h. After aspirating each well and washing, each well was added with 200 μl substrate solution at dark for 30 min; Finally, each well was added with 50 μl stop solution and the optical density was assayed immediately at 540 nm with a spectrophotometer (Bio-Rad Laboratories).

Invasion and migration assays

HepG2.2.15 cells were co-cultured with T cells and plated on the top side of Transwell filter coated with (for invasion analysis) or without Matrigel (BD, New York, USA) (for migration analysis) in the top chamber. Cells were suspended in medium without serum and medium supplemented with serum were filled in the bottom chamber. The cells were incubated at 37 °C for 48 h. The noninvasive or non-migratoryion cells in the top chambers were removed with cotton swabs. The invaded cells or migrated cells on the lower membrane surface were fixed in 100% methanol for 10 min, air-dried, then stained staining with 0.1% crystal violet solution, and counted under a microscope.

Flow cytometer assay

After co-culture with NC-T cells, HBV-T cells or amygdalin treated HBV-T cells for 48 h, the HepG2.2.15 were harvested for apoptosis analysis. Quantification of apoptotic cells was performed with Annexin V-FITC apoptosis detection kit (Keygen, China). Briefly, the HepG2.2.15 cell samples were harvested with 0.25% trypsin without EDTA after 48 h of infection and then washed twice with ice-cold PBS and re-suspended in 500 μl binding buffer. Then cells were incubated with 5 μl Annexin V-FITC specific antibodies and 5 μl propidium iodide (PI) then incubated for 15–20 min in the dark and detected by BD Accuri C6 flow cytometer (BD, USA) with an excitation wavelength of Ex = 488 nm and an emission wavelength of Em = 530 nm.

For T cell surface markers detection, Fixed T cells were permeabilized by adding 1 ml of cold Phosflow Perm Buffer III (BD Biosciences) and incubating for 30 min on ice. Samples were then washed and incubated with the mouse anti-human antibodies (BD Biosciences) anti-CD3-PE-Cy5, −CD4-FITC, −CD8-FITC, and p-STAT3-PE at room temperature for 1 h. Then, the cells were washed and collected for flow cytometry analysis on a BD Accuri C6 flow cytometer (BD, USA). Each experiment was repeated three times in triplicate.

Statistical analyses

Data were expressed as means ± SD of at least three independent experiments. A one-way ANOVA was used for the comparison of the differences among more three groups. The level of significance was based on the probability of *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

Results

Effect of amygdalin on normal (NC-T) and HBV-related HCC T cells (HBV-T)

First, the effects of amygdalin on T cell growth and cytokine production were determined to investigate its role in HBV-related HCC. The cell viability of NC-T cells was examined upon different doses of amygdalin (0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 μg/ml) to select a proper treating dose. As shown in Fig. 1a, 10, 15, and 20 μg/ml of amygdalin treatment remarkably increased the cell viability of NC-T cells. Therefore, the minimum effective dose (10 μg/ml) was chosen for further experiments. Next, we examined NC-T and HBV-T cell growth with or without 10 μg/ml amygdalin treatment. Compared to the cell viability of NC-T cells, HBV-T cell viability was significantly inhibited; while amygdalin treatment significantly rescued the cell viability of HBV-T cell, compared to that of HBV-T cell without amygdalin treatment (Fig. 1b). As for the cytokines production, IFN-γ and TNF-α levels remarkably decreased while IL-6 and IL-10 level increased in HBV-T cells, compared to those in NC-T cells; amygdalin treatment significantly rescued IFN-γand TNF-α levels while reduced IL-6 and IL-10 levels, in comparison with those in HBV-T cells without amygdalin treatment (Fig. 1c-f).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Effect of amygdalin on normal (NC-T) and HBV-related HCC T cells (HBV-T). a T cells isolated from the peripheral blood from healthy donors (NC-T) were stimulated with 5 μg/ml Con A and treated with a series of doses of amygdalin (0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 μg/ml) and examined for cell viability using MTT assay. b The cell viability of NC-T and T cells isolated from the peripheral blood from HBV-related HCC patients (HBV-T) was examined by MTT assay with or without amygdalin treatment (10 μg/ml). c-f The production of IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10 in NC-T and HBV-T cells was determined by ELISA with or without amygdalin treatment (10 μg/ml). n = 5, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, compared to NC-T group, #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001, compared to HBV-T group

Effect of amygdalin on the activation of T cells and the phosphorylation of STAT3 and JAK2 in T cells

It has been revealed that amygdalin could rescue the cell viability of HBV-T cells, next, we investigate whether amygdalin could activate T cells via examining the ratio of CD4+ and CD8+/total T cells using Flow cytometry. According to Fig. 2a, the rate of CD8+ /HBV-T cells was significantly lower than that in NC-T cells; however, amygdalin treatment rescued the proportion of CD8+ /HBV-T cells. In contrast, the ratio of CD4+ /HBV-T cells was significantly higher than that in NC-T cells; amygdalin treatment reversed the proportion of CD4+ /HBV-T cells. These findings indicate amygdalin treatment could activate T cells in HBV-related HCC.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Effect of amygdalin on T cell activation and the phosphorylation of STAT3 and JAK2 in T cells. a, b The mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in total CD3+ T cells with or without amygdalin treatment determine by Flow cytometry analysis. n = 3. c, d The average mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of p-STAT3 in CD4+ and CD8+ NC-T and HBV-T cells with or without amygdalin treatment determine by Flow cytometry analysis, n = 3. e The mRNA levels of STAT3 and JAK2 in NC-T and HBV-T cells with or without amygdalin treatment determined by real-time PCR, n = 3. f The protein levels of p-STAT3, STAT3, p-JAK2, and JAK2 in NC-T and HBV-T cells with or without amygdalin treatment determine by Immunoblotting, n = 3. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, compared to NC-T group, #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, compared to HBV-T group

As we have mentioned, being increased in the CD4+ and CD8+ subtypes in peripheral blood of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, the p-STAT3 expression can lead to aberrant immunological surveillance, thus promoting the development of hepatocellular carcinoma [17]. Here, the p-STAT3 and p-JAK2 levels in CD4+ and CD8+ NC-T and HBV-T cells were measured using Flow cytometry with or without amygdalin treatment. The results have revealed that p-STAT3 and p-JAK2 expression in CD8+ (Fig. 2c) and CD4+ subtypes (Fig. 2d) in HBV-T cells was higher than that in NC-T cells. Consistently, amygdalin treatment reduced the phosphorylation levels of STAT3 and JAK2 in CD8+ and CD4+ HBV-T cells (Fig. 2c-d), compared to those in HBV-T cells without amygdalin treatment. RT-PCR and Immunoblotting analyses reveal similar results, the mRNA levels of STAT3 and JAK2 was increased in in HBV-T cells while was reduced by amygdalin treatment. The protein ratio of p-STAT3/STAT3 and p-JAK2/JAK2 was increased in HBV-T cells while was reduced by amygdalin treatment (Fig. 2e and f). Therefore, amygdalin treatment could increase T cells activity in HBV-related HCC.

Coculture with T cells affects the cytokine production in HepG2.2.15 cells

Next, we co-cultured HCC cell line, HepG2.2.15 cell, with NC-T or HBV-T cells in the presence or absence of amygdalin therapy to investigate the effects of amygdalin on cytokine production. As shown in Fig. 3, without amygdalin treatment, co-culture with HBV-T cells significantly reduced IFN-γ and TNF-α production while increased IL-6 and IL-10 production, compared to NC-T co-culture group. Consistent with the effect on T cell viability and activity, amygdalin treatment rescued IFN-γ and TNF-αproduction while reduced IL-6 and IL-10 production in HBV-T cell co-cultured HepG2.2.15 cells. These findings indicate that amygdalin could act on HepG2.2.15 cells by affecting HBV-T cells.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Co-culture with T cells affects the cytokine production in HepG2.2.15 cells. a-d HepG2.2.15 cells were co-cultured with NC-T, HBV-T cells or amygdalin treated HBV-T cells and examined for the production of IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10 using ELISA with or without amygdalin treatment, n = 5. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, compared to NC-T group, #p < 0.05, ###p < 0.001, compared to HBV-T group

Effects of amygdalin on HepG2.2.15 cell viability, apoptosis, invasion, and migration

As amygdalin affects HBV-T cells to act on cytokine production in HepG2.2.15 cells, next, we investigated whether amygdalin could also affect HepG2.2.15 cell viability, apoptosis, invasion, and migration via HBV-T cells. As shown in Fig. 4a, compared to co-culture with NC-T cells, co-culture with HBV-T cells significantly increased the cell viability of HepG2.2.15 while amygdalin treatment suppressed the cell viability induced by co-culture. Consistently, compared to co-culture with NC-T cells, co-culture with HBV-T cells inhibited HepG2.2.15 cell apoptosis, while amygdalin treated HBV-T cells promoted HepG2.2.15 cell apoptosis (Fig. 4b). Moreover, co-culture with HBV-T cells reduced the expression of cleaved caspase 3 while amygdalin treated HBV-T cells reversed those reduction, further indicating the protive effect of amygdalin on apoptosis (Fig. 4c). Compared to co-culture with NC-T cells, Co-culture with HBV-T cells significantly enhanced the invasion and migration of HepG2.2.15 cells, which could be inhibited by amygdalin therapy (Fig. 4d-e). In summary, amygdalin treatment could affect the cell viability, apoptosis, invasion, and migration of HepG2.2.15 cells through acting on HBV-T cells.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Effects of amygdalin on HepG2.2.15 cell viability, apoptosis, invasion, and migration. a-d HepG2.2.15 cells were co-cultured with NC-T, HBV-T cells or amygdalin treated HBV-T cells and examined for the cell viability, apoptosis, caspase-3 cleavage, invasion, and migration of HepG2.2.15 cells using MTT (a), Flow cytometry (b), immunoblotting (c), and Transwell assays (d, e) n = 5 for MTT assay, n = 3 for flow cytometry, transwell assays and immunoblotting. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, compared to HepG2.2.15 + NC-T group, #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, compared to HepG2.2.15 + HBV-T group

Discussion

Here, we demonstrate that amygdalin treatment could rescue the HBV-T cell viability and IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-2 production. In HBV-T cells, the MFI levels of CD8+ are lower than that in NC-T cells and could be reversed by amygdalin treatment. Moreover, the phosphorylation levels of STAT3 and JAK2 are higher in HBV-T cells, compared to those in NC-T cells, and could be reduced by amygdalin treatment. Co-culture with HBV-T cells could reduce IFN-γ and TNF-α production while increase IL-6 and IL-10 production in HepG2.2.15 cells; these alterations could be partially reversed by amygdalin pretreatment. Finally, co-culture with HBV-T cells significantly promoted the cell viability, inhibited the apoptosis, and promoted the invasion and migration of HepG2.2.15 cells, and these alterations could be partially reversed by amygdalin treatment.

Complex T cell immune responses are associated with HBV infection. Studies on mice infected by HBV revealed that CD4+ subtypes were main regulatory factors of the adaptive immune response to HBV, while CD8+ subtypes were key cytokines that mediate the clearance of HBV [29]. In addition, T cells are the primary cell type in tumor immunity; among them, CD4+ subtypes could modulate the anti-tumor immunity via secreting cytokines, while CD8+ subtypes could conduct the secretion of specific inhibitory cytokines, including IFN-γ and TNF-α. CD4+ subtypes, including Th1 and Th2, could not only promote the cytotoxic effect of CTL cells via secreting IL-2, IL-12, IFN-γ, TNF-α, but also stimulate humoral immunity response, promote antibody production and suppress Th1 factors secretion via secreting IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10 [30, 31]. In the present study, amygdalin treatment (10, 15, and 20 μg/ml) significantly increases the cell growth of T cells derived from peripheral blood of healthy donors and also rescues the cell growth of T cells derived from patients with HBV-related HCC. Moreover, HBV-T cells secret fewer IFN-γ and TNF-α but more IL-6 and IL-10 than NC-T cells, while amygdalin pretreatment could rescue IFN-γ and TNF-α production and reduce IL-6 and IL-10 production, indicating that amygdalin could play a role in the development of HBV-related HCC through acting on T cell-mediated tumor immunity.

In the tumor-infiltrating immune cells, such as dendritic cells, natural killer cells, and granulocytes, STAT3 phosphorylation is increased. An intrinsic immune-surveillance system can be activated by the suppression of STAT3 activity in hematopoietic cells, thus inhibiting tumor growth and metastasis [32]. p-STAT3 expression in the CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in peripheral blood is higher in patients with active multiple sclerosis than in healthy patients, besides, in several cases of recurrent sclerosis, the p-STAT3 level is closely related to T cell response function [33]. In summary, cellular immune responses, especially CD4+ and CD8+ T cell-mediated immune responses, are essential for the monitoring of malignant tumors and the control of hepatocellular carcinoma development [34]. Herein, the ratio of CD4+ and CD8+/HBV-T cells is remarkably increased or decreased than that in NC-T cells. More importantly, in line with above-mentioned findings, STAT3 and JAK2 phosphorylation levels also considerably increased in HBV-T cells. It has been reported that lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced increases in the protein of liver PI3K, AKT, m-TOR, TIMP-1, STAT3, and JAK2 in LPS-treated rats were suppressed by the treatment of 1.5 mg/kg Amygdalin, therefore reducing LPS-induced chronic liver injury in rats by down-regulating the PI3K/AKT, JAK2/STAT3 and NF-κB signaling pathways [35]. Interestingly, we find that amygdalin pretreatment increases HBV-T cell activity and significantly reduces the levels of p-STAT3 and p-JAK2, further indicating that amygdalin could affect T cell activity.

It has been proposed that tumors can increase the production of Th2 cytokines, such as IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10. IL-4 and IL-10 are negative regulators in the antitumor immune responses, and they can inhibit IL-2, IL-12, IFN-γ, and TNF-α production by Th1 cells [30]. In the serum of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and supernatants of peripheral monocytes cocultured with Huh7 cells, the levels of cytokines (IL-4, IL-6, and IL-10) could be upregulated, while the level of IFN-γ could be downregulated [17]. In the present study, co-culture with HBV-T cells also significantly reduced IFN-γ and TNF-α production but increased the secretion of IL-6 and IL-10 in HepG2.2.15 cells, while co-culture-induced alterations in cytokines production in HepG2.2.15 cells could be significantly reversed by amygdalin treatment. More importantly, co-culture with HBV-T cells leads to an increase in the cell viability, invasion, and migration and a decrease in cell apoptosis of HepG2.2.15 cells, while amygdalin treatment significantly reverses the effects of HBV-T cell co-culture on HepG2.2.15 cells.

These findings all indicate that amygdalin treatment could increase the HBV-T cell activity via suppressing the phosphorylation of STAT3 and JAK2, subsequently increases antitumor cytokines production, such as IFN-γ and TNF-α, finally inhibiting the cell growth, invasion, and migration while increasing HepG2.2.15 cell apoptosis. In summary, our in vitro findings provide a rationale for further studies on the functions and mechanism of amygdalin inhibiting HBV-related HCC cell proliferation, invasion, and migration via T cell-mediated tumor immunity.

Regarding the shortcomings of the present study, the present conclusion is based on in vitro experiments; thus, it is unreasonable to draw any conclusion on the in vivo benefits of amygdalin. Considering increasing evidence have been proposed on the in vitro anti-tumor effects of amygdalin while few positive results have been reported based on in vivo studies, in vivo investigation on the role of amygdalin is of great importance. Notably, the risk of serious adverse effects from cyanide poisoning after laetrile or amygdalin, especially after oral ingestion [36, 37], should be considered in in vivo investigation and, more importantly, other drug-delivery ways should be investigated in the meantime.

Conclusion

Our findings confirmed that amygdalin inhibits HBV-related HCC cell proliferation, invasion, and migration via T cell-mediated tumor immunity.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Llovet JM, Burroughs A, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 2003;362(9399):1907–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bosch FX, et al. Primary liver cancer: worldwide incidence and trends. Gastroenterology. 2004;127(5 Suppl 1):S5–S16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hao XS, et al. Twenty-year trends of primary liver cancer incidence rates in an urban Chinese population. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2003;12(4):273–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen CJ, Iloeje UH, Yang HI. Long-term outcomes in hepatitis B: the REVEAL-HBV study. Clin Liver Dis. 2007;11(4):797–816 viii.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schmidt N, Neumann-Haefelin C, Thimme R. Cellular immune responses to hepatocellular carcinoma: lessons for immunotherapy. Dig Dis. 2012;30(5):483–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schmidt J, Blum HE, Thimme R. T-cell responses in hepatitis B and C virus infection: similarities and differences. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2013;2(3):e15.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Marshall NB, Swain SL. Cytotoxic CD4 T cells in antiviral immunity. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2011;2011:954602.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Quezada SA, et al. Tumor-reactive CD4(+) T cells develop cytotoxic activity and eradicate large established melanoma after transfer into lymphopenic hosts. J Exp Med. 2010;207(3):637–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Fu J, et al. Impairment of CD4+ cytotoxic T cells predicts poor survival and high recurrence rates in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2013;58(1):139–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Subramaniam A, et al. Potential role of signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)3 signaling pathway in inflammation, survival, proliferation and invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1835(1):46–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lin HY, Chiang CH, Hung WC. STAT3 upregulates miR-92a to inhibit RECK expression and to promote invasiveness of lung cancer cells. Br J Cancer. 2013;109(3):731–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ren L, et al. Bone metastasis from breast cancer involves elevated IL-11 expression and the gp130/STAT3 pathway. Med Oncol. 2013;30(3):634.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cho KH, et al. STAT3 mediates TGF-beta1-induced TWIST1 expression and prostate cancer invasion. Cancer Lett. 2013;336(1):167–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lesinski GB. The potential for targeting the STAT3 pathway as a novel therapy for melanoma. Future Oncol. 2013;9(7):925–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu Y, et al. IL-6, a risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma: FLLL32 inhibits IL-6-induced STAT3 phosphorylation in human hepatocellular cancer cells. Cell Cycle. 2010;9(17):3423–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tai WT, et al. Mcl-1-dependent activation of Beclin 1 mediates autophagic cell death induced by sorafenib and SC-59 in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Cell Death Dis. 2013;4:e485.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang X, et al. Aberrant expression of p-STAT3 in peripheral blood CD4+ and CD8+ T cells related to hepatocellular carcinoma development. Mol Med Rep. 2014;10(5):2649–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Moss RW. Patient perspectives: Tijuana cancer clinics in the post-NAFTA era. Integr Cancer Ther. 2005;4(1):65–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Saleem M, et al. Amygdalin, from apricot kernels, induces apoptosis and causes cell cycle arrest in cancer cells: an updated review. Anti Cancer Agents Med Chem. 2018;18(12):1650–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jaswal V, Palanivelu J, Ramalingam C. Effects of the gut microbiota on amygdalin and its use as an anti-cancer therapy: substantial review on the key components involved in altering dose efficacy and toxicity. Biochem Biophys Rep. 2018;14:125–32.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Abboud MM, et al. Antitumor action of amygdalin on human breast cancer cells by selective sensitization to oxidative stress. Nutr Cancer. 2019;71:483–90.

  22. Makarevic J, et al. Amygdalin delays cell cycle progression and blocks growth of prostate cancer cells in vitro. Life Sci. 2016;147:137–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Qian L, et al. Amygdalin-mediated inhibition of non-small cell lung cancer cell invasion in vitro. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8(5):5363–70.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Tang F, et al. Amygdalin attenuates acute liver injury induced by D-galactosamine and lipopolysaccharide by regulating the NLRP3, NF-kappaB and Nrf2/NQO1 signalling pathways. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;111:527–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hwang HJ, et al. Inhibitory effect of amygdalin on lipopolysaccharide-inducible TNF-alpha and IL-1beta mRNA expression and carrageenan-induced rat arthritis. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;18(10):1641–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang A, et al. Protective effect of amygdalin on LPS-induced acute lung injury by inhibiting NF-kappaB and NLRP3 signaling pathways. Inflammation. 2017;40(3):745–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Buritova J, et al. The contribution of peripheral bradykinin B2 receptors to carrageenan-evoked oedema and spinal c-Fos expression in rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 1997;320(1):73–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Liu Y, et al. LncRNA TINCR/miR-31-5p/C/EBP-alpha feedback loop modulates the adipogenic differentiation process in human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell Res. 2018;32:35–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang PL, et al. Immune effectors required for hepatitis B virus clearance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(2):798–802.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang H, et al. Effects of microwave ablation on T-cell subsets and cytokines of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2017;26(4):207–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mantovani A, et al. Cancer-related inflammation. Nature. 2008;454(7203):436–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kortylewski M, et al. Inhibiting Stat3 signaling in the hematopoietic system elicits multicomponent antitumor immunity. Nat Med. 2005;11(12):1314–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Iorio R, et al. T-bet, pSTAT1 and pSTAT3 expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells during pregnancy correlates with post-partum activation of multiple sclerosis. Clin Immunol. 2009;131(1):70–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Behboudi S, Boswell S, Williams R. Cell-mediated immune responses to alpha-fetoprotein and other antigens in hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int. 2010;30(4):521–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Yang Y, et al. Amygdalin reduces lipopolysaccharide-induced chronic liver injury in rats by down-regulating PI3K/AKT, JAK2/STAT3 and NF-kappaB signalling pathways. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2019;47(1):2688–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Milazzo S, Horneber M. Laetrile treatment for cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015(4):CD005476.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Sauer H, et al. Severe cyanide poisoning from an alternative medicine treatment with amygdalin and apricot kernels in a 4-year-old child. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2015;165(9–10):185–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the patients and healthy individuals for their participation.

Funding

This research fund of this study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81503556). The funding did not parcipate the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RW, DZ and YW made substantial contribution to the conception and design of the work; KS and JP analyzed and interpreted the data; QW and WZ drafted the manuscript; SY, DT and YW revised the work critically for important intellectual content; All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yunan Wu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration. The study was approved by the ethics committee of First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine (No. HN-LL-GZR-201507). All the involved patients have signed the informed consent forms.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

The clinical characteristic.

Additional file 2: Table S2.

The primer seuqence.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, R., Zhang, D., Sun, K. et al. Amygdalin promotes the activity of T cells to suppress the progression of HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma via the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway. BMC Infect Dis 21, 56 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-05713-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-020-05713-0

Keywords