Skip to main content

The metagenomic next-generation sequencing in diagnosing central nervous system angiostrongyliasis: a case report



The incidence of angiostrongyliasis is increasing in recent decades due to the expanding endemic areas all over the world. Clinicians face tremendous challenge of diagnosing angiostrongyliasis because of the lack of awareness of the disease and less effective definitive laboratory tests.

Case presentation

A 27-year-old man initially manifested skin itching, emesis, myalgia and quadriparesis. With progressive weakness of four limbs and elevated protein in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), he was diagnosed as Guillain-Barré syndrome and treated with intravenous methylprednisolone and immunoglobulin. However, the patient deteriorated with hyperpyrexia, headache and then persistent coma. The routine tests for Angiostrongylus cantonensis (A. cantonensis) with both the CSF and the serum were all negative. In contrast, the metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) was applied with the serum sample and the CSF sample in the middle phase. The central nervous system (CNS) angiostrongyliasis was diagnosed by mNGS with the mid-phase CSF, but not the mid-phase serum. At the same time, the CSF analysis revealed eosinophils ratio up to 67%. The discovery of A. cantonensis was confirmed by PCR with CSF later. Unfortunately, the patient died of severe angiostrongyliasis. During his hospitalization, mNGS was carried out repeatedly after definitive diagnosis and targeted treatment. The DNA strictly map reads number of A. cantonensis detected by mNGS was positively correlated with the CSF opening pressure and clinical manifestations.


The case of A. cantonensis infection highlights the benefit of mNGS as a target-free identification in disclosing the rare CNS angiostrongyliasis in the unusual season, while solid evidence from routine clinical testing was absent. The appropriate sample of mNGS should be chosen according to the life cycle of A. cantonensis. Besides, given the fact that the DNA reads number of A. cantonensis fluctuated with CSF opening pressure and clinical manifestations, whether mNGS could be applied as a marker of effectiveness of treatment is worth further exploration.

Peer Review reports


Angiostrongylus cantonensis (A. cantonensis) is a zoonotic pathogen, which occasionally causes human angiostrongyliasis with the main clinical manifestation as eosinophilic meningitis [1]. Although the parasite is usually endemic to Southeast Asia and the Pacific Basin, the global distribution of A. cantonensis is expanding, and the incidence of angiostrongyliasis among humans is increasing, too [2]. Angiostrongyliasis usually presents as eosinophilic meningitis or meningoencephalitis with protean clinical manifestations including paresthesia, headache, weakness, nerve pain, coma or even death [2]. The patients with angiostrongyliasis who received appropriate treatment in the early phase usually have a favorable prognosis [3]. However, approximately 10% of the untreated or delayed treated patients may develop severe central nervous system (CNS) angiostrongyliasis with mortality as high as 79–91% [4,5,6]. Moreover, the treatment of angiostrongyliasis beyond the early phase is still controversial, especially for severe CNS angiostrongyliasis [7]. Herein, achieving the definitive diagnosis of angiostrongyliasis as early as possible is essential for patients to survive. Unfortunately, neither the eosinophilic peak nor the positive antibody against A. cantonensis would appear in the early phase of angiostrongyliasis [8], not mentioning the insufficient awareness of angiostrongyliasis among doctors beyond the traditional endemic areas. The diagnosis of angiostrongyliasis has been a great challenge for clinicians. The metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), which takes the advantage of allowing target-independent identification of all microbes in a sample, has been more and more applied in the diagnosis of infectious diseases [9]. In this case, we used mNGS to identify the parasitic etiology in an unusual case in which the common laboratory testing of the serum and the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were all negative. Moreover, the case also provided new prospect for the first time that the sensitivity of mNGS with CSF sample might be higher than that with serum sample for angiostrongyliasis in the middle phase. The mNGS was also applied to monitor the progress and treatment effectiveness of the case.

Case presentation

A 27-year-old male officer, who was previously healthy and lived in South China, was presented to a local clinic in early November after skin itching, emesis, generalized myalgia and slight weakness in all limbs (Time line in Fig. 1). He denied any recent trauma, homosexual behavior, exposure to toxins, illicit substances, sick people, arthropods, or rodents. Additionally, he denied diet habit or history of eating fresh locally produced vegetables, snails, slugs, crabs and lizards. He had no known sick contacts but consumed a worm which accidentally entered the box with take-away smoked meat and was eaten by mistake one day before the onset. Given a suspicion of allergy and mild rhabdomyolysis, he was treated with anti-allergic agents and rehydration.

Fig. 1

The time line of the case’ medical process. Dex: dexamethasone

Five days after onset (DAI 6), the patient manifested progressive pain and weakness of all limbs but alleviated itching. Upon admission to a local hospital, he presented muscle strength of Grade 3 for all limbs in physical examination. Transient rashes on his trunk were observed on DAI 8 (Fig. 2a). The CSF opening pressure was mildly elevated (230 mm H2O) by lumbar puncture (LP) on DAI 11, with the white blood cell (WBC) 164 × 10^6/L (71% monocytes and 29% multinucleated cells), protein 2380 mg/L and glucose 3.75 mg/L. CSF/blood glucose ratio was 71.1%. Gram stain was negative for bacteria. Fungal stain was negative for Cryptococcus, and no worms were seen in the CSF. Microbiological tests and computed tomography (CT) of the brain were unrevealing. He was then treated as Guillain-Barré syndrome with a high dose of intravenous methylprednisolone (40 mg/d) and immunoglobulin (0.4 g/kg/d) from DAI 11 to DAI 15, showing a significant but temporary improvement.

Fig. 2

Clinical features of the patient with severe CNS angiostrongyliasis. a Generalized rashes throughout the trunk; b Coconut-like CSF; c Increased CSF eosinophils (yellow arrow); d The enhancement of meninges on T1WI (red arrows); e & f The extremely high CSF opening pressure over 1100mmH2O

On DAI 15, the patient’s condition suddenly deteriorated with fever, generalized flaccid paralysis, gatism, and mental aberrations, including delusion and raves. The second LP was performed immediately to find CSF opening pressure remaining at 230mmH2O. CSF analysis revealed WBC 278 × 10^6/L (85% monocytes and 15% multinucleated cells). The CSF protein was 620 mg/L and glucose was 3.2 mg/L with CSF/blood glucose ratio of 58.6%. Cytology of CSF was not recorded. The mNGS for pathogen detection from the serum was carried out on DAI 16 and reported negative on DAI 18 (See Additional file 1). The serum enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for parasites also negative. CT of the abdomen showed the peritoneum was focally thickened, indicating the possibility of peritonitis. Ceftriaxone and linezolid were thus prescribed immediately as the anti-infection therapy.

On DAI 17, the patient was transferred to our intensive care unit (ICU) for further treatment. He was sleepy but alert, complained of severe weakness, mild headache and stomachache. Neurological examination was remarkable for severe quadriparesis (muscle strength of Grade 1) and positive meningeal irritation signs. Extensive microbiological tests of the serum were negative on admission. He was intubated on DAI 20. The LP was performed again on DAI 20 and revealed raised CSF opening pressure of 520mmH2O and mNGS with the CSF sample was carried out for the first time. Of note, the CSF showed the coconut-like appearance (Fig. 2b), and the analysis of CSF disclosed eosinophils proportion was 67% (Fig. 2c), with the leucocytes increased to 750 × 10^6/L. On the same day, the patient fell into a persistent coma with the Bispectral index fluctuating between 50 to70. Given the consideration of worsening infection, ceftriaxone was replaced by meropenem. Ophthalmological consult recorded significant papilloedema but no evidence of parasitic invasion. As a result of the multidisciplinary consultation on DAI 21, dexamethasone (10 mg per day) and albendazole (400 mg per day) were added to the patient’s treatment regimen, with the consideration that parasitic infection was a potential etiology.

On DAI 22, A. cantonensis was reported for the first time by mNGS from the CSF with the DNA strictly map reads number (SMRN) of 13,492. The result was verified by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) later with the same CSF sample for mNGS (Fig. 3) (Experimental details of mNGS and qPCR in Additional file 2). With the permit of his wife, the patient was treated by standard regimen of albendazole (400 mg twice a day) and high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone (500 mg per day) since DAI 23 according to the result of mNGS. On the other hand, mNGS was then carried out periodically to assess the condition during treatment (Fig. 4). Moreover, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on DAI 24 demonstrated diffuse enhancement of the meninges and cervical leptomeninges, with multiple new lacunar infarctions, scattered tiny hemorrhages, and prominent Virchow-Robin spaces (Fig. 2d). A. cantonensis was not confirmed by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) until DAI 31.

Fig. 3

A. cantonensis identified by qPCR with the CSF on DAI 21

Fig. 4

The cover charts of CSF mNGS for diagnosis. a Results of the mNGS for diagnosis on DAI 22. The DNA SMRN of A. cantonensis counted 83.81% among all microbes detected; b Results of mNGS after half-dose albendazole on DAI 25. The DNA SMRN of A. cantonensis counted 93.22% among all microbes detected; c Results of the mNGS after conventional dose of albendazole combined with methylprednisolone pulse on DAI 31. The DNA SMRN of A. cantonensis counted 97.14% among all microbes detected; d Results of the mNGS after intrathecal dexamethasone on DAI 36. The DNA SMRN of A. cantonensis counted 96.07% among all microbes detected

Unfortunately, methylprednisolone was suspended on DAI 26 due to severe bleeding of pre-existing hemorrhoids and then the intrathecal dexamethasone was tried on DAI 31 because the miserable fact that the CSF opening pressure increased to more than 1100 mm H2O (Fig. 2e & f) and the patient was in deep coma with the Bispectral index falling to 20–30. The high CSF opening pressure then showed a drastic drop after intrathecal dexamethasone and eventually stabilized (Fig. 5). On the other hand, the Bispectral index recovered to 30 to 40 and the patient’s vital signs became relatively stable with less intravenous norepinephrine. The DNA SMRN of mNGS during treatment disclosed a sharp increase since anthelmintic therapy and a trend of slight decline after intrathecal dexamethasone (Fig. 5). However, the patient never regained his consciousness. He eventually died on DAI 38, right after the family abandoned therapy and discharged voluntarily, 16 days after the NGS diagnosis and 37 days after onset of symptoms.

Fig. 5

Change of the CSF opening pressure and SMRN of A.cantonensis along with treatment. DAI: day after ingestion; Dex: dexamethasone; Met: Methylprednisolone

Discussion and conclusions

Although most human angiostrongyliasis manifests as eosinophilic meningitis and is of good prognosis with in-time treatment with corticosteroids and/or anthelmintics, CNS angiostrongyliasis with delayed treatment or untreated may developed into fatal meningoencephalitis. Given the fact that there is no valid treatment of severe CNS angiostrongyliasis, the early diagnosis and intervention accordingly becomes extremely essential for patients with angiostrongyliasis to survive. Although the discovery of larvae from the CSF or eye chamber is the gold standard for the diagnosis of CNS angiostrongyliasis, these findings are quite rare even in the severe cases [2]. Currently, angiostrongyliasis is usually considered based on the history of mollusk consumption, clinical features, eosinophilic pleocytosis in the CSF, and identification of positive antibody [10]. The increase of CSF eosinophils often follows an incongruent timeline to symptoms onset. The peak concentration of eosinophils in both CSF and peripheral serum has been reported at DAI 25–35 [8]. Immunological methods and PCR, such as ELISA, dot immunogold filtration assay (DIGFA) and PCR based on the 18S rRNA, were successfully applied for the identification of A. cantonensis [11,12,13]. However, positive results of ELISA or DIGFA can hardly be obtained in the acute phase of the disease. The animal experiments reveal the peak antibody response occurs 4 weeks after infection [14, 15]. Reverse transcription-PCR (rt-PCR) is of a specificity of 100% and advancing sensitivity but not general availability [16]. Moreover, the median time from onset to positive PCR result is 21 days, which is beyond the advised time window for anthelmintics [7, 16]. Last but not least, the effectiveness of all these target-dependent tests is compromised due to their dependence on the clinicians’ awareness of specific pathogens. Due to facilitated transportation and increasing interaction between districts throughout the world, more and more infectious diseases may break through their original endemic areas and spread all over the world, beyond the expectation of clinicians. Conventional microbiological testing is considered insufficient to detect all neuroinvasive pathogens [17]. In recent years, mNGS has become generally available for clinicians and it is suggested as a very powerful tool to detect the nucleic acids of all organisms in multiple biological materials. The target-independent identification of pathogens greatly facilitates the diagnosis of intracranial infectious diseases because it could provide important clues of all possible pathogenic microbes and assist clinicians in terms of diagnosis and treatment [9, 17, 18]. The new research on mNGS in severe CNS infectious diseases reported that mNGS contributed in diagnosing cases which were not identified with clinical testing and guiding treatment [17]. A prospective study reported that the sensitivity of mNGS in identifying bacteria, fungi, virus and tuberculosis in CSF was 73.3, 80, 76 and 66.7%, respectively, whereas the specificity of mNGS in diagnosing bacteria, fungi and tuberculosis in CSF was 95.9, 79.3 and 96.4%, respectively [19]. Comprehensively, mNGS was reported to achieve 73–92% sensitivity and 96–99% specificity compared to the routine laboratory testing, with 81% positive percent agreement and 99% negative percent agreement in terms of detecting pathogens in CSF [20]. In one word, either the positive or the negative results of mNGS could provide profound assistance to clinicians to make decisions.

In the current case, A. cantonensis was first detected by mNGS from the cerebrospinal fluid on DAI 20. After the identification of A. cantonensis by mNGS in the CSF, other definitive testing, including specific antibody, Charcot-Leyden crystals, reported positive. It is suggested that the mNGS showed high sensitivity in detecting A. cantonensis compared with other concurrent laboratory testing, and the target-independent identification of pathogens could aid clinicians to achieve definitive diagnosis even the clinician was unaware of the etiology. Therefore, mNGS did facilitate the identification of pathogens in the case. On the other hand, although A. cantonensis was reported to be detected with mNGS in a previous case, its existence was not confirmed with PCR [18]. In our case, the discovery of A. cantonensis by mNGS was verified by PCR, which provided solid evidence to support the workability of mNGS in identifying A. cantonensis.

Interestingly, the mNGS with serum sample on DAI 16 was negative in this case. A previous study has proved that mNGS with serum sample along could be false negative in meningitis and encephalitis [17]. As known, the larvae would molt and migrate from the intestines, passing through the liver, lungs, and finally reach the central nervous system within two weeks after ingestion, causing various but non-specific symptoms including enteritis, cough, developed fever, eosinophilic meningitis [2]. Therefore, the negative serologic identification of A. cantonensis by mNGS can be explained by the absence of nucleic acid of the causative pathogen in the mid-phase serum, where all larvae had left and migrated into the CNS. It is suggested that the effectiveness of samples may have a time window which is based on the life cycle of parasites. For detection of A. cantonensis, we suggest the CSF samples must be included for mNGS and the serum samples should not be tested alone once beyond the time window of two weeks.

A. cantonensis does not multiply but migrates, grows and dies in the CNS of humans [7]. The natural death of larvae in the CNS usually occurs approximately 1–2 months after migration into the CNS [21]. In our case, we recorded the change of DNA SMRN of A. cantonensis by mNGS since the definitive diagnosis in order to deepen the understanding of angiostrongyliasis and its treatment (Fig. 5). The increase of SMRN after anthelmintic treatment might suggest the growing segments of perished larvae, while the decline of SMRN was consistent with the improved vital signs after intrathecal dexamethasone. Besides, as Fig. 5 showed, the fluctuation of DNA SMRN of A. cantonensis varied in general accordance with the CSF opening pressure. The relationship between fluctuation of DNA SMRN and clinical outcome is worth further exploring.

The case of A. cantonensis infection highlights the benefit of mNGS as a target-free identification in disclosing the rare CNS angiostrongyliasis in the unusual season, while solid evidence from routine clinical testing was absent. Given the expanding endemic area of A. cantonensis due to the increasing interaction between districts and global warming, clinicians should be aware of the possibility of angiostrongyliasis and choose appropriate samples for mNGS according to the life cycle of A. cantonensis. Whether the DNA SMRN, which varied with CSF opening pressure and clinical manifestations, could be applied to monitor disease progression and treatment effectiveness is worth further observation.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



Central nervous system


Metagenomic next-generation sequencing


Cerebrospinal fluid


Day after ingestion


Lumbar puncture


White blood cell


Computed tomography


Intensive care unit


Strictly map reads number


Quantitative polymerase chain reaction


Magnetic resonance imaging


Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay


Dot immunogold filtration assay


Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction


  1. 1.

    Wang QP, Lai DH, Zhu XQ, Chen XG, Lun ZR. Human angiostrongyliasis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2008;8(10):621–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    McAuliffe L, Fortin Ensign S, Larson D, Bavaro M, Yetto J, Cathey M, et al. Severe CNS angiostrongyliasis in a young marine: a case report and literature review. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19(4):e132–42.

  3. 3.

    Kwon E, Ferguson TM, Park SY, Manuzak A, Qvarnstrom Y, Morgan S, et al. A severe case of Angiostrongylus eosinophilic meningitis with encephalitis and neurologic sequelae in Hawa'i. Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2013;72(6 Suppl 2):41–5..

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Hochberg NS, Blackburn BG, Park SY, Sejvar JJ, Effler PV, Herwaldt BL. Eosinophilic meningitis attributable to Angiostrongylus cantonensis infection in Hawaii: clinical characteristics and potential exposures. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011;85(4):685–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Sawanyawisuth K, Takahashi K, Hoshuyama T, Sawanyawisuth K, Senthong V, Limpawattana P, et al. Clinical factors predictive of encephalitis caused by Angiostrongylus cantonensis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009;81(4):698–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Chotmongkol V, Sawanyawisuth K, Thavornpitak Y. Corticosteroid treatment of eosinophilic meningitis. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;31(3):660–2.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Prociv P, Turner M. Neuroangiostrongyliasis: the “subarachnoid phase” and its implications for anthelminthic therapy. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018;98(2):353–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Murphy GS, Johnson S. Clinical aspects of eosinophilic meningitis and meningoencephalitis caused by Angiostrongylus cantonensis, the rat lungworm. Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2013;72(6 Suppl 2):35–40.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Mitchell SL, Simner PJ. Next-generation sequencing in clinical microbiology: are we there yet? Clin Lab Med. 2019;39(3):405–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Barratt J, Chan D, Sandaradura I, Malik R, Spielman D, Lee R, et al. Angiostrongylus cantonensis: a review of its distribution, molecular biology and clinical significance as a human pathogen. Parasitology. 2016;143(9):1087–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Eamsobhana P. Angiostrongyliasis in Thailand: epidemiology and laboratory investigations. Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2013;72(6 Suppl 2):28–32.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    De NV, Duyet le V, Chai JY. A case of ocular Angiostrongyliasis with molecular identification of the species in Vietnam. Korean J Parasitol. 2015;53(6):713–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Eamsobhana P, Wanachiwanawin D, Dechkum N, Parsartvit A, Yong HS. Molecular diagnosis of eosinophilic meningitis due to Angiostrongylus cantonensis (Nematoda: Metastrongyloidea) by polymerase chain reaction-DNA sequencing of cerebrospinal fluids of patients. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2013;108(1):116–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Wang LC, Wan YL. Alteration of antibodies against the fifth-stage larvae and changes in brain magnetic resonance images in experimentally infected rabbits with Angiostrongylus cantonensis. J Parasitol. 2004;90(5):1193–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Liang SH, Huang HC, Pan CW, Tan F. Detection of Angiostrongylus cantonensis circulating antigen by monoclonal antibodies. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2005;85(43):3057–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Qvarnstrom Y, Xayavong M, da Silva AC, Park SY, Whelen AC, Calimlim PS, et al. Real-time polymerase chain reaction detection of Angiostrongylus cantonensis DNA in cerebrospinal fluid from patients with Eosinophilic meningitis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016;94(1):176–81.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Wilson MR, Sample HA, Zorn KC, Arevalo S, Yu G, Neuhaus J, et al. Clinical metagenomic sequencing for diagnosis of meningitis and encephalitis. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(24):2327–40.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Zhang YF, Wang SN, Wang DM, Huang KB, Hu YF. Validation of Angiostrongylus cantonensis combined with herpes simplex virus type 1 in cerebrospinal fluid by next-generation sequencing. Chin Med J. 2020;133(2):247–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Xing XW, Zhang JT, Ma YB, He MW, Yao GE, Wang W, et al. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for diagnosis of infectious encephalitis and meningitis: a large, prospective case series of 213 patients. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020;10:88.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Miller S, Naccache SN, Samayoa E, Messacar K, Arevalo S, Federman S, et al. Laboratory validation of a clinical metagenomic sequencing assay for pathogen detection in cerebrospinal fluid. Genome Res. 2019;29(5):831–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Takahashi I, Yamada M, Matsushima M, Sato K, Kano T, Yabe I, et al. Treatment of intractable tuberculous meningitis using intrathecal isoniazid administration and steroid pulse therapy; a report of two cases. Rinsho Shinkeigaku. 2012;52(8):551–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors thank all the clinical and laboratory stuffs contributed in the case.


This work was unrestrictedly supported by the Southern China International Cooperation Base for Early Intervention and Functional Rehabilitation of Neurological Diseases (2015B050501003), which covered the fee of language editing and manuscript publication.

Author information




LF performed the medical process and wrote the manuscript. AW fixed the clinical management and analyzed the data. JQ helped to perform the clinical process and examined CSF. HZ helped to analyze the data. HW took part in the clinical management and editing. YG guided mNGS experiment and performed result analysis. XS took part in the clinical course and performed cartography. RL took part in the clinical course and data collection. CS took part in the clinical course and data collection. FP took part in data analysis and management fixation. HF helped to analyze data and revised the draft. LC supervised the whole medical process and made the final revision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ling Chen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The whole work was in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki. As this is a case report without experimental intervention during routine care, no formal research ethics approval is required.

Consent for publication

Written, fully informed consents for all treatment and tests have been given and recorded from the wife of the patient. Identifiable information has been excluded from the manuscript and written informed consent was obtained from the wife of the patient for publicizing medical record and clinical data involved in this case report.

Competing interests

Yuanlin Guan, contributed in mNGS experiment and result analysis, is employed by Hugobiotech Co. Ltd. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1

The cover chart of serum mNGS. Additional file 1 provided the cover chart of serum mNGS on DAI 16 which was negative in revealing A. cantonensis.

Additional file 2.

Procedure of mNGS and PCR. Additional file 2 provided detailed procedure of mNGS and PCR.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feng, L., Zhang, A., Que, J. et al. The metagenomic next-generation sequencing in diagnosing central nervous system angiostrongyliasis: a case report. BMC Infect Dis 20, 691 (2020).

Download citation


  • Angiostrongyliasis
  • Eosinophilic meningoencephalitis
  • Metagenomic next-generation sequencing
  • Diagnosis
  • Case report