Disseminated NTM
NTM are a group of microbes that are highly prevalent in the environment. Infections resulting from NTM have received more attention recently, especially among patients with chronic renal disease, malignancy, autoimmune disease, and acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). Nonetheless, the diagnosis of NTM infection can be challenging and biopsy is sometimes necessary to confirm the diagnosis of NTM infection [5]. Lymph nodes are the primary organs that are involved in an NTM infection, followed by osteoarticular system, bone, lung, and skin [4, 6]. Unlike M. tuberculosis (TB), NTM infection does not show human-to-human transmission. Moreover, NTM infection is more difficult to treat compared with infections due to TB because of the high level of resistance to available antimicrobial agents. For example, nearly all NTM species show resistance to pyrazinamide, which is one of mainstay anti-TB drugs. Furthermore, in the case of severe or disseminated NTM, the BTS guidelines recommend intravenous antibiotics, such as amikacin, for at least 3 months. Intravenous antibiotics using may lead to prolong hospitalization stay and influence treatment adherence [7]. Overall, the course of treatment for NTM infections usually lasts for more than 12 months. However, the severity and natural course of infections depend on the immunological status of the host. Long-term anti-NTM treatment maybe necessary among patient with incurable immunocompromised status. Disseminated MAC infections were very common in patients with advanced AIDS in developing countries before the widespread use of potent antiretroviral therapies [8]. Because disseminated NTM is common and life-threatening in people with advanced AIDS, mycobacterial antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended in patients with HIV infection and whose CD4 count is less than 50 cells/mm3 [9]. NTM infections occur mostly in immunocompromised patients. Hence, it is difficult to diagnosis disseminated NTM infection in non-immunocompromised patients. In our reported case, a patient without evidence of immunocompromised status was initially considered to have lung cancer instead of disseminated NTM infection.
Anti-IFN-γ autoantibodies
Macrophages generate IL-12/23 that is stimulated by microbial components, such as lipopolysaccharides, and responses to intracellular infection. IFN-γ is synthesised by T cells and NK cells under IL-12/23 stimulation. In turn, IFN-γ can activate macrophages, which destroy intracellular microbes. IFN-γ/IL-12/23 axis plays a crucial role against intracellular infections, such as disseminated NTM infections, salmonellosis, other intramacrophagic bacterial infections, and reactivating latent varicella-zoster virus infection [3, 10]. Several studies have revealed the impact of IFN-γ/IL-12/23 axis defects. Kamijo et al. reported a study in which IFN-γ receptor-deficient mice were vaccinated with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin. Tumoral necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), IL-1α, and IL-6 could not be produced after infection in the IFN-receptor-deficient mice. Subsequently, these mice could neither form granulation nor kill mycobacteria because of cell-media immunity defects [11]. Mendelian susceptibility to mycobacterial diseases (MSMD) is a term used to describe a group of patients who are susceptible to mycobacterial diseases because of primary immunodeficiency diseases, including a defect of the interferon-γ receptor [12]. Anti-IFN-γ autoantibodies have received increasing attention recently and have been associated with disseminated, recurrence, and refractory NTM infections. Patients with high titer of anti-IFN-γ autoantibodies are vulnerable to intracellular microbes in a way similar to MSMD. High titer of anti-IFN-γ autoantibodies are defined as detectable anti-IFN-γ autoantibodies in plasma diluted 1:5000 [13, 14]. Regardless, the origin of anti-IFN-γ autoantibodies and its mechanisms remain unclear. Cases of patients with disseminated NTM because of anti-IFN-γ autoantibodies were first reported in 2004 [15, 16]. Patel et al. recruited 23 non-immunocompromised patients with disseminated NTM infection. Anti-IFN-γ autoantibodies were detected in 6 of the 23 patients (26%). All 6 patients with anti-IFN-γ autoantibodies were female, parous, and of Asian origin [13]. Another study by Chi et al. enrolled 17 Chinese adults diagnosed with disseminated NTM infection who otherwise did not have HIV infection, autoimmune diseases, diabetes mellitus, liver cirrhosis, or congenital immunodeficiency and were not undergoing immunosuppressive or immunomodulation therapy. All 17 (100%) patients tested positive for anti-IFN-γ autoantibodies, 35% had coinfection with salmonellosis, while 71% had herpes zoster infection [10, 17]. In the aforementioned studies, examination for anti-IFN-γ autoantibodies suggested disseminated NTM infection in the patients without known immunological defect, especially in those of Asian origin. Recent studies have shown that treatment with rituximab could improve the prognosis of disseminated NTM infection with anti-IFN-γ autoantibodies. Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody against the B cell protein CD20. It is recognised as a key cornerstone to treat diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Rituximab may improve the recovery of IFN-γ signalling by IFN-γ-induced STAT1 phosphorylation [14]. Although large randomised controlled trials to support this hypothesis are lacking, rituximab could be an option or rescue treatment for disseminated NTM infection in patients with anti- IFN-γ autoantibody.
We presented a case of disseminated NTM infection in a previously healthy Asian male with anti- IFN-γ autoantibody. Detection of anti-IFN-γ autoantibodies may help to identify the risk of NTM infection, particularly in people of Asian origin. To date, there are no established differences in the treatments available for patients with or without anti-IFN-γ autoantibodies. Due to patient’s personal reasons, there was no serial data of titer of anti-IFN-γ autoantibodies in our case during treatment and clinical followup. However, disseminated NTM infection with anti-IFN-γ autoantibodies may indicate treatment failure and recurrent according to previous case reports. Rituximab may be considered as an optional treatment for refractory or recurrent NTM infection in patients with anti- IFN-γ autoantibody, although evidence to support this is currently lacking.