Skip to main content

Therapeutic efficacy of chloroquine for treatment of Plasmodium vivax malaria cases in Guragae zone southern Central Ethiopia

Abstract

Background

Malaria continues to be a public health problem and important cause of morbidity and mortality in Ethiopia. Due to continuous interventions to combat malaria in endemic regions, a decline in malaria related deaths and morbidity has been registered. These gains, however, are threatened with the emergency of antimalarial drugs resistant strains of plasmodium parasites. This study aimed to determine therapeutic efficacy of chloroquine for treatment of Plasmodium vivax malaria cases in Guragae zone, southern central Ethiopia.

Methods

A one arm prospective study with recurrence of parasitaemia and clinical conditions of patients were evaluated on days 0, 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, and 28. Patients with Plasmodium vivax malaria mono infection and eligible for study inclusion criteria were recruited. SPSS-21 used for data analysis and management. Kaplan-Meier survival probability analysis was estimated. Mean geometric parasitaemia and average haemoglobin concentration were calculated.

Results

Among 87 total recruited subjects, 81 of them completed the 28 days follow up. More than half of (57.5%) the study participants had a history of fever and 42.5% of them had fever at the time of enrollment. The mean body temperature on day of recruitment was 38.2 °C and 36.8 °C on day 28. Geometric mean parasitaemia calculated on day of enrollment was 2270 parasites/μl of blood. Recurrence of parasitaemia was registered from two subjects during entire follow up. The mean haemoglobin concentration of study participants on day of enrolment was 11.8 g/ dl and 13.8 g/dl on day 28.

Conclusion

This study registered a high chloroquine efficacy rate among the study participants. Therefore, chloroquine remains efficacious for the treatment of Plasmodium vivax malaria in the study area. However, there is a need to monitor chloroquine resistance by employing molecular tools for better evaluation of treatment outcome.

Peer Review reports

Background

Malaria annually affects several hundred million people and malaria due to Plasmodium vivax (P.vivax) is the most important and a major public health problem [1]. Studies show that prevalence of P.vivax infection in east Africa, particularly in Ethiopia is higher [2]. Malaria is prevalent in 75% of Ethiopian land mass reporting 4 up to 5 million malaria cases annually. P.vivax distribution is mainly associated with altitude and rainfall. Vivax malaria accounts for up to 40% of malaria cases in Ethiopia [3]. According to 2016/2017 Gurage zone health department report, malaria ranks among the top ten diseases in the zone.

Prompting effective treatment is one of effective global strategies in fighting against P.vivax malaria as it benefit for both the patient and community. However, the effectiveness of such treatment strategy highly depends on the national policy of providing effective first line antimalarial drugs [2, 4]. Progress in eliminating P.vivax malaria need monitoring the anti vivax malarial drug for identifying emergence of multidrug resistant isolates [5]. Monitoring drug resistance is essential for timely changes to treatment policy, which should be initiated when the treatment failure rate in the country exceeds 10% [6, 7].

Despite the fact that emergence of chloroquine(CQ) resistant P.vivax isolates are reported from different parts of the world [8,9,10]. However, there are only few studies conducted on therapeutic efficacy of CQ for treatment of P.vivax in malaria endemic areas of Ethiopia [11, 12]. More studies are needed on the degree of CQ resistance of P.vivax in malaria endemic areas like Ethiopia to have clear picture of the country wide CQ resistance distribution. The present study gives updated information about the status of CQ resistance for the treatment of P.vivax in the study area.

Methods

Study period and area

The study was carried out from December, 2016 to May, 2017 in three selected health care centers located in Guragae zone, Southern Nations Nationalities, and People’s region. Guragae zone is located 155 k-meters south of Addis Ababa, the capital of Ethiopia. The zone has an annual rainfall of 800 to 1400 mm.

Study design and population

A one-arm prospective study, with clinical and parasitological evaluation was done. 87 study subjects confirmed with P.vivax mono-infection on blood film examination and fulfilled the inclusion criteria were recruited. Sample size was calculated using single population proportion formula with expected 5% failure rate, a desired precision of 5 and 95% confidence interval (CI), and assuming an additional 20% for loss to follow-up [6]. Proportionate number of study participant in each selected health care center was determined and each study subject was recruited consecutively until the total sample size was attained.

Inclusion criteria

Febrile patients (documented body temperature greater than 37.5 °C or having history of fever within the previous 48 h), who fulfilled other inclusion criteria and signed an informed consent was eligible for the study. Specifically, patients of aged > 6 months, microscopically confirmed P. vivax mono-infection, non-pregnant or non-breast-feeding women, permanently living within the health center catchment area (10 km radius) during the study period were recruited [6].

Exclusion criteria

Study participants were excluded due to presence of other causes of fever at the time of screening, pregnancy, administration of any additional anti-malarial drugs during the study period, and subjects who vomit twice during drug administration [6].

Patient enrolment, treatment and follow-up

Fixed schedule check-up visits were done on days 0, 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28. Corresponding clinical evaluation and laboratory examination were made. Baseline data on socio-demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded [6]. In areas endemic for P.vivax including in our study area, CQ is the first line drug [13]. Hence, patients were treated with a quality assured 25 mg/kg CQ (Addis Pharmaceuticals, Adigrat, batch number BN13079, date of expiration 06/2018), administered under direct observation for 3 consecutive days (10 mg/kg on days 0 and 1, and 5 mg/kg on day 2). Primaquine is an antimalarial drug given for radical cure, but it is not yet prescribed for vivax malaria in P.vivax endemic areas of Ethiopia. Subjects were checked for vomiting for 30 min after the drug ingestion. Blood smear microscopic examination was made in every scheduled visit. Moreover, haemoglobin concentration measurement was done on day 0, 28 and days of recurrence. Study participant failing to come to their scheduled appointment was traced to home assisted by the local guide. Study subjects were classified as having therapeutic failure and an adequate response [6]. Recurrence indicated when there is occurrence of P.vivax after the initial clearance of parasite from circulation. Subjects are considered to have cleared parasitaemia if there are at least two sequential negative smears and the day on which the first such negative smear is observed defined as the day of clearance [14].

Drug quality analysis

The quality of CQ (Addis Pharmaceuticals, Adigrat, batch number BN13079, date of expiration 06/2018), used to treat all study participants was checked for its quality following the standard procedures before administration.

Parasite detection

Thick and thin blood film microscopic examination was done to identify P.vivax mono infection. Asexual stages of P.vivax were counted against 200 white blood cells, assuming the average total white blood cell count of 8000/μl. Parasite density, expressed as the number of asexual parasites per μl of blood, was calculated by dividing the number of asexual parasites by the number of white blood cells counted and then multiplying it by an assumed white blood cell density (8000 per μl). Blood film examination was recorded as negative when examination of 1000 white blood cells revealed no asexual parasites. Parasite reduction ratio(PRR) was calculated using the formula PRR = Po/P2 (where Po is parasite count on day 0 and P2 parasite count on day 2) [6].

Pregnancy test and haemoglobin determination

In pregnant females since Artesunate is recommended for treatment vivax malaria, female study participants aged 12 years and older were tested for pregnancy (WONDFO BIOTECH CO.LTD, China, batch number W00160542, date of expiration 06/2018). Haemoglobin concentration was also measured on day 0, on day of recurrence parasitaemia and on day 28 by using HemoCue Hb 301(Sweden) analyzer.

Quality assurance

All positive and 10% of negative slides were picked randomly for quality control and re-examined by expert microscopist at Wolkite University parasitology Laboratory.

Data analysis

SPSS version-21 (Chicago,USA) was used for data management and analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival probability analysis was used to calculate cumulative incidence of failure. Parasite reduction ratio, mean geometric parasite density and mean haemoglobin were calculated.

Study variables and operational definition

Study variables include therapeutic efficacy of CQ, socio-demographic characteristics, clinical characteristics, haemoglobin concentration and parasite density.

Early treatment failure(ETF)

Subject that has an asexual parasitaemia of any level persisting to day 7 during follow up period [6].

Late treatment failure(LTF)

Presence of an asexual parasitaemia that becomes undetectable but reappears at any time between days 7 and 28 during follow up period [6].

Adequate response(AR)

Absence of parasitaemia on day 28, irrespective of axillary temperature or subjects having no recurrence parasitaemia up to day 28 during follow period [6].

Results

Baseline characteristics of the study participants

A total of 108 P.vivax mono infected patients were screened in all selected health care centers, of which 87 were eligible to the 28 days follow-up study. The rest 21 participants were not enrolled in the study due to different reason. Among 87 recruited participants 81 of them had completed the entire 28 days follow up. While six were excluded because they vomited twice during the third dose of CQ, P. falciparum detection on day 7, and lost to follow up on day 7 and 14 as illustrated in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure1

Flow chart of the study participants enrolment and follow up in the study of CQ therapeutic efficacy for treatment of P.vivax malaria cases in Guragea zone, southern central Ethiopia from December, 2016 - May,2017

The median age of study participants was 19 (18 months–42 years). Males were higher in proportion than females (1.2: 1). More than half of the study participants had a history of fever (57.5%) and illness two days before the day of enrolment (55.4). Geometric mean parasite density of study participants at the day of enrollment was 2270 /μl and parasitaemia clearance time for all recruited participants was observed 48 h after the day of enrollment. Mean body temperature registered on the day of recruitment was 38.2 °C and 36.8 °C on day 28. All study participants cleared fever (37.0 °C) on day 2 following treatment as shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Socio-demographic, parasitological and clinical characteristics of study participant recruited in the study of in vivo CQ therapeutic efficacy for treatment of P.vivax malaria cases in Guragea zone, southern central Ethiopia from December, 2016 - May, 2017

Efficacy outcomes

Two treatment failures (a 26 years old female on day 21 and a 28 years male on day 28) for CQ were registered. Parasitaemia persisted up to day 28 in treatment failure cases, while parasitaemia load was lower on day of admission as compared to day of enrollment (mean parasitic density on day 0 was 3700.5 parasites/μl and 139 parasites/μl on day of recurrence). PRR for treatment failure calculated was 2.7/μl (Table 1). Mean haemoglobin concentration value improvement was observed between day of enrolment (11.8 g/ dl) and day 28 (13.8 g/dl) (Table 2). Adequate response after 28 days follow up was 79 (96.0%) (Table 3).

Table 2 Haemoglobin concentration meseasured in the study of in vivo CQ therapeutic efficacy for treatment of P.vivax malaria cases in Guragea zone, southern central Ethiopia from December, 2016 - May, 2017
Table 3 Kaplan–Meier survival estimate of risk of therapeutic failure of CQ for the treatment of P.vivax malaria cases in Guragea zone, southern central Ethiopia from December, 2016 - May, 2017

Discussion

One of the greatest challenges facing malaria control today is antimalarial drug resistance. Drug resistance has been implicated in the spread of malaria to new areas and re-emergence of malaria in areas where the disease had been eradicated. Though CQ is the first-line drug for the treatment of P.vivax malaria in most endemic countries including Ethiopia [15], studies elsewhere [16, 17], showed increase in P.vivax resistance to CQ. Prevalence and geographical distribution of reported CQ treatment failures for P.vivax influence timely change in treatment policy in the country [8, 15].

In this in vivo CQ therapeutic efficacy study, two late parasitological treatment failures were registered. The finding is comparable with previous reports from different areas of Ethiopia; Hossana (3.3%) [18], Debrezeit 2% [19], and Serbo 3.6% [12] but when compared with previous report from Halaba special woreda in southern Ethiopia(11.7%) [20] and elsewhere [21, 22], it is lower. Variation in treatment failures observed might be due to host immunity [23], as majority of high treatment failures reported elsewhere [20,21,22] happened in young children which is in contrary to our results.

The changes in parasite density that occur following treatment indicate therapeutic response to anti-malarial drugs. Parasite clearance from the blood reflects the stage specificity and intrinsic potency of the anti-malarial drugs used [24, 25], in the present study parasite clearance was achieved within 48 h of drug ingestion and parasitaemia was lower on the day of recurrence than on day of enrolment for treatment failure. Similar with other studies done elsewhere [12, 18, 19], all study participants were cleared of fever following treatment. P.vivax is known to digest haemoglobin [26], in this study like most studies done elsewhere [12, 18, 19] mean haemoglobin improvement was also observed from day of enrolment to day 28.

Relapse, mal-absorption of drug, poor drug quality and re-infection could be factors contributing to treatment failure of P. vivax. Because, the drug used was confirmed to have good quality and CQ can prevent the re-infection up to 35 days, the possible causes of treatment failure in this study might be due to either mal-absorption of the drug or relapse [27]. Even though in-vivo therapeutic efficacy studies remain the ‘gold standard’ method for assessing CQ efficacy, due to the difficulty in classifying true treatment failure; as recurrences (biological resistance) or relapse due to hypnozoites stage, supplementing it with molecular test is recommended.

Conclusions

It is important to survey and intervene CQ treatment failures before it become a public health problem. CQ remains efficacious for the treatment of P.vivax malaria in the study area. However, the authors believe there is a need to monitor CQ resistance by employing molecular tools for better evaluation of treatment outcomes. Despite the fact that Ethiopia is in elimination phase malaria, it is worth mentioning that prevalence of P.vivax observed in the study area requires strong malaria intervention measures.

Abbreviations

CQ:

Chloroquine

P.vivax :

Plasmodium vivax

PRR:

Parasite Reduction Ratio

References

  1. 1.

    WHO. Global technical strategy for malaria 2016-2030. World Health Organization; 2015 Nov 4.

  2. 2.

    Hwang J, Graves PM, Jima D, Reithinger R, Kachur SP, Ethiopia MIS Working Group. Knowledge of malaria and its association with malaria-related behaviors—results from the Malaria Indicator Survey, Ethiopia, 2007. PLoS One. 2010;5(7):e11692.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    WHO. World malaria report 2015. World Health Organization; 2016 Jan 30.

  4. 4.

    Newton PN, Fernandez FM, Green MD, Primo-Carpenter J, White NJ. Counterfeit and substandard anti-infectives in developing countries. In Antimicrobial resistance in developing countries. New York: Springer; 2010. p. 413–43.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Price RN, Tjitra E, Guerra CA, Yeung S, White NJ, Anstey NM. Vivax malaria: neglected and not benign. AM J TROP HYG. 2007;77(6 Suppl):79–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    WHO. Methods for surveillance of antimalarial drug efficacy. World Health Organization; 2009. http://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44048.

  7. 7.

    Lacerda MVG, Zackiewicz C, Alecrim WD, Alecrim MGC. The neglected Plasmodium vivax: are researchers from endemic areas really concerned about new treatment options? Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2007;40(4):489–90.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Global report on antimalarial drug efficacy and drug resistance 2000–2010: WHO, World Health Organization; 2010.

  9. 9.

    Heidari A, Keshavarz H, Shojaee S, Raeisi A, Dittrich S. In vivo susceptibility of Plasmodium vivax to chloroquine in southeastern Iran. IJP. 2012;7(2):8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Sutanto I, Suprijanto S, Manoempil P, Baird JK. Resistance to chloroquine by Plasmodium vivax at Alor in the lesser Sundas archipelago in eastern Indonesia. AM J TROP HYG. 2009;81(2):338–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Getachew S, Thriemer K, Auburn S, Abera A, Gadisa E, Aseffa A, et al. Chloroquine efficacy for Plasmodium vivax malaria treatment in southern Ethiopia. Malar J. 2015;14(1):525.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ketema T, Bacha K, Birhanu T, Petros B. Chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium vivax malaria in Serbo town, Jimma zone, south-West Ethiopia. Malar J. 2009;8(1):177.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Jima D, Getachew A, Bilak H, Steketee RW, Emerson PM, Graves PM, et al. Malaria indicator survey 2007, Ethiopia: coverage and use of major malaria prevention and control interventions. Malar J. 2010;9(1):58.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Price RN, Douglas NM, Anstey NM, von Seidlein L. Plasmodium vivax treatments: what are we looking for? Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2011;24(6):578.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    FMOH. Malaria treatment guideline: Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Ministry of Health; 2004.

  16. 16.

    Fryauff DJ, Tuti S, Mardi A, Masbar S, Patipelohi R, Leksana B, et al. Chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium vivax in transmigration settlements of West Kalimantan, Indonesia. AM J TROP HYG. 1998;59(4):513–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Alelign A, Dejene T. Current status of malaria in Ethiopia: evaluation of the burden, factors for transmission and prevention methods. Acta Parasitologica Globalis. 2016;7(1):01–6.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Assefa M, Eshetu T, Biruksew A. Therapeutic efficacy of chloroquine for the treatment of Plasmodium vivax malaria among outpatients at Hossana health care Centre, southern Ethiopia. Malar J. 2015;14(1):458.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Tulu AN, Webber RH, Schellenberg JA, Bradley DJ. Failure of chloroquine treatment for malaria in the highlands of Ethiopia. TRSTMH. 1996;90(5):556–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Ketema T, Getahun K, Bacha K. Therapeutic efficacy of chloroquine for treatment of Plasmodium vivax malaria cases in Halaba district, South Ethiopia. Parasit Vectors. 2011;4(1):46.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Teka H, Petros B, Yamuah L, Tesfaye G, Elhassan I, Muchohi S, et al. Chloroquine-resistant plasmodium vivax malaria in Debre Zeit, Ethiopia. Malaria J. 2008;7(1):220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Sumawinata IW, Leksana B, Sutamihardja A, Subianto B, Fryauff DJ, Baird JK. Very high risk of therapeutic failure with chloroquine for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax malaria in Indonesian Papua. AM J TROP HYG. 2003;68(4):416–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    White NJ. Malaria parasite clearance. Malar J. 2017;16(1):88.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    WHO. Guidelines for the treatment of malaria. World Health Organization; 2015 Aug 13.

  25. 25.

    White N, Pukrittayakamee S, Hien T, Faiz M, Mokuolu O, Dondorp A. Erratum: Malaria. Lancet. 2014;383(9918):696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Moore LR, Fujioka H, Williams PS, Chalmers JJ, Grimberg B, Zimmerman PA, et al. Hemoglobin degradation in malaria-infected erythrocytes determined from live cell magnetophoresis. FASEB J. 2006;20(6):747–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Baird JK. Chloroquine resistance in Plasmodium vivax. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48(11):4075–83.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank heads of the Zonal and Weredas’ health offices, data collectors, study participants.

Funding

The study was sponsored by Wolkite University. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The data sets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

TS, AW conceived the study, participated in the study design, data analysis and drafted the manuscript. TS, AJ, HW, and FB coordinated the laboratory work, participated in data analysis and preparation of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teha Shumbej.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocols were reviewed and approved by the Ethical Review Committee of Wolkite University (Ref.No.WR 5669/32/09). Letters of permission was obtained from Guragea Zone Health Department and each Woredas’ Health Office. The objective as well as the nature of the study was explained to the participant and written informed consent was obtained from each participant or their guardians for patient younger than 18 years. Those patients who didn’t respond to the therapeutic dose of chloroquine were re-treated with quinine as recommended by national guideline [15].

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shumbej, T., Jemal, A., Worku, A. et al. Therapeutic efficacy of chloroquine for treatment of Plasmodium vivax malaria cases in Guragae zone southern Central Ethiopia. BMC Infect Dis 19, 413 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4055-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Plasmodium vivax
  • Therapeutic efficacy
  • Guragae zone
  • Ethiopia