Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Molecular and descriptive epidemiology of intestinal protozoan parasites of children and their pets in Cauca, Colombia: a cross-sectional study

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 3,
  • 4 and
  • 1Email authorView ORCID ID profile
BMC Infectious Diseases201919:190

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-3810-0

  • Received: 28 November 2018
  • Accepted: 12 February 2019
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Parasitic infections, particularly those caused by protozoa, represent a considerable public health problem in developing countries. Blastocystis, Giardia duodenalis, Cryptosporidium spp. and the Entamoeba complex (Entamoeba histolytica, Entamoeba dispar and Entamoeba moshkovskii) are the most common etiological causes of intestinal parasitic infections.

Methods

We carried out a descriptive cross-sectional study in school-age children attending a daycare institution in commune eight of Popayán, Cauca (Southwest Colombia). A total of 266 fecal samples were collected (258 from children and eight from pets). Blastocystis, G. duodenalis, Cryptosporidium spp. and the Entamoeba complex were identified by microscopy, quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) and conventional PCR. The concordance of qPCR and microscopy was assessed using the Kappa index. Molecular characterization was conducted to identify Blastocystis subtypes (18S), G. duodenalis assemblages (tpi and gdh) and Cryptosporidium species/subtypes (18S and GP60). Potential associations between intestinal parasitism and sociodemographic factors were examined using bivariate analyses.

Results

A total of 258 fecal samples from children were analyzed by microscopy and 255 samples were analyzed by qPCR. The prevalence of Blastocystis was between 25.19% (microscopy) and 39.22% (qPCR), that of G. duodenalis was between 8.14% (microscopy) and 10.59% (qPCR), that of Cryptosporidium spp. was estimated at 9.8% (qPCR), and that of the Entamoeba complex was between 0.39% (conventional PCR) and 0.78% (microscopy). The concordance between microscopy and qPCR was very low. Blastocystis ST1 (alleles 4, 8, and 80), ST2 (alleles 11, 12, and 15), ST3 (alleles 31, 34, 36, 38,57, and 151), and ST4 (alleles 42 and 91), G. duodenalis assemblages AII, BIII, BIV and D, C. parvum subtype IIa and C. hominis subtype IbA9G3R2 were identified. The only identified member of the Entamoeba complex corresponded to E. histolytica. No statistically significant association was identified between parasitic infection and any sociodemographic variable.

Conclusion

This study revealed the usefulness of molecular methods to depict the transmission dynamics of parasitic protozoa in southwest Colombia. The presence of some of these protozoa in domestic animals may be involved in their transmission.

Keywords

  • Blastocystis
  • Giardia duodenalis
  • Cryptosporidium
  • Entamoeba histolytica/dispar/moshkovskii complex
  • Zoonotic disease

Background

Infections by Intestinal parasites occur worldwide, and their high prevalence rates represent a major public health problem. The major pathogens responsible for intestinal parasitic infections are protozoa. These microorganisms can cause significant morbidity in children as well as opportunistic infections in immunosuppressed patients [1]. Infection by intestinal parasites is generally associated with factors such as fecal contamination of soil and food, insufficient access to clean drinking water, lack of environmental sanitation, and vulnerable socioeconomic conditions. Given the socio-cultural features of developing countries, these regions tend to have the highest rates of infection by parasites [2]. Among the intestinal protozoa, Blastocystis, Giardia duodenalis (also known as Giardia intestinalis and Giardia lamblia), Cryptosporidium spp. and members of the Entamoeba complex (Entamoeba histolytica, Entamoeba dispar and Entamoeba moshkovskii) impose major burdens of diarrheal disease in children. The primary modes of protozoan parasite transmission are the fecal-oral route after direct or indirect contact with the infective forms (cysts/oocysts), human to human transmission, animal to human transmission, transmission by water, transmission through contaminated food, and airborne transmission (for Cryptosporidium spp. only) [3, 4].

Blastocystis are pleomorphic intestinal parasites commonly found in the gastrointestinal tracts of humans and both domestic and wild animals across the world [5]. Significant genetic diversity has been observed among the numerous Blastocystis isolates identified in humans and animals. Blastocystis can be grouped into subtypes with similar morphological characteristics: using the small subunit of ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA), at least 17 subtypes (ST1 to ST17) and 151 different 18S alleles have been described [69]. ST1–ST8 and ST12 infect humans and animals (primates, pigs, cattle, rodents, and birds), ST9 infects only humans, and ST10, ST11, and ST13–ST17 have only been isolated from animals [10, 11]. In Colombia, the estimated prevalence of Blastocystis is 52.1% and studies have described the major circulating subtypes in human and animal populations (ST1–ST4 and ST6–ST8, of which ST1 and ST3 were found in humans and ST2 was found in both humans and dogs) [8, 1113].

G. duodenalis is a single-celled flagellated parasite that infects the gastrointestinal tracts of humans and other mammals [14]. To date, eight genetic groups of G. duodenalis (assemblages A to H) have been identified [15]. Assemblages A (including AI and AII) and B (BIII and BIV) are responsible for most human infections and have also been identified in a wide range of mammals. The remaining assemblages show more restricted host ranges: assemblages C and D have been identified in canines, E in cattle, F in cats, G in rodents and H in seals and gulls [16]. In Colombia, the estimated prevalence of G. duodenalis in children is 15.4% and assemblages A and B have been detected with different frequencies depending on the population studied [13, 1720].

Cryptosporidium spp. mainly infects the intestine and other extracellular spaces. Based on morphological, biological and molecular markers (SSU rRNA, HSP70, oocyst wall protein and the 60-kDa glycoprotein gp60, also known as gp40/15), at least 30 species and more than 70 genotypes have been identified. At least 20 species have been identified in humans and more than 90% of human infections are caused by Cryptosporidium hominis (anthroponotic) and Cryptosporidium parvum (zoonotic). Other species, including Cryptosporidium meleagridis, Cryptosporidium canis, Cryptosporidium felis, Cryptosporidium ubiquitum, and Cryptosporidium cuniculus, are less frequently detected in humans [21]. Ten subtypes of C. hominis (Ia–Ik) and 16 subtypes of C. parvum (IIa–IIp) have been described, with subtypes Ia, Ib, Id, and Ie of the former and subtypes IIa and IId of the latter having the highest prevalence worldwide [22]. In Colombia, the prevalence of this parasite is 0.5% and few studies have identified C. parvum, C. hominis or C. viatorum in humans [13].

The genus Entamoeba includes seven species: E. histolytica, E. dispar, E. moshkovskii, Entamoeba bangladeshi, Entamoeba poleki, Entamoeba coli and Entamoeba hartmanni. E. histolytica, E. dispar and E. moshkovskii are morphologically identical but genetically distinct; however, because the direct diagnostic methods currently in use do not permit their differentiation, they are typically reported as a complex. In humans the Entamoeba complex (E. dispar, E. histolytica and E. moshkovskii) is only differentiated by means of PCR. E. dispar is non-pathogenic while E. histolytica is pathogenic; the pathogenicity of E. moshkovskii is still controversial. In Colombia, all three species have been detected in asymptomatic children with a prevalence of approximately 15% [23].

Diagnosis of protozoan intestinal parasites is typically made using conventional methods such as microscopic examination of stool samples. This method is limited by its low specificity and sensitivity, which are related to the instability and rapid deterioration of some protozoan parasites outside the host [24]. Microscopic examination cannot distinguish between different species of Cryposporidium, between different assemblages of Giardia, between different subtypes of Blastocystis and between pathogenic and nonpathogenic species of Entamoeba [25]. For this reason, implementation of molecular techniques to diagnose circulating parasite species and subpopulations in vulnerable populations has been proposed to accurately measure parasite prevalence in endemic areas. Real-time PCR (qPCR) is an alternative technique that allows identification of parasitic DNA from preserved fecal matter and has a sensitivity between 80 and 100%, thus allowing more sensitive detection of parasitic infection than microscopy [24, 26, 27]. However, few studies in Colombia have addressed the prevalence of these parasites or attempted to compare prevalence estimates using different diagnostic techniques.

Therefore, the aim of the present study was the epidemiological and molecular characterization of intestinal protozoa (Blastocystis, G. duodenalis, Cryptosporidium spp. and members of the Entamoeba complex) in children and dogs living in the commune eight of Popayán, Cauca, southwest Colombia. A secondary goal was to conduct an overall comparison of the diagnostic performance of microscopy versus qPCR.

Methods

Study population

School-aged children (age 12–54 months) attending a daycare institution located in commune eight in Popayán, Cauca, southwest Colombia and 8 samples derived from dogs, as the only pet used in the study were recruited. A total of 266 fecal samples were collected (258 samples from children and eight from their pets). All samples were used for identification of intestinal protozoa by conventional and molecular methods. For samples that were positive using molecular methods, detailed molecular characterization was performed.

Sociodemographic variables

At the time of providing informed consent, a structured survey was administered to collect information on the following variables: intestinal discomfort, socioeconomic stratum (In Colombia, the stratums are divided from 1 to 6 according to monthly income; stratums 1–2 are considered low-income, 3–4 middle-income and 5–6 high income), place of residence, age, sex, number of children in the house, monthly income, type of property, floor type, wall type, availability of public services, water quality, presence and number of pets, fecal elimination habits, hand washing habits and garbage storage/disposal procedures.

Detection of intestinal parasites

Microscopy

Fecal samples were split into two. The first half of the sample was fixed with SAF solution (sodium acetate, acetic acid and formaldehyde) for identification of intestinal parasites by direct examination (microscopy) in saline solution containing Lugol’s iodine accompanied by the modified Ritichie-Frick concentration method and the Kato-Katz method as suggested by the World Health Organization (WHO) [28].

Real time PCR

DNA was extracted from the second half of the fecal sample using the Norgen Stool Extraction Kit, then The qPCRs were performed in 96 wells MicroAmp (Applied Biosystems), reactions in a total volume of 9 μL containing 3.5 μL of Taqman™ Mastermix (Roche), 1.0 μL of species-specific primers (10 μM) and primers of the internal amplification control (IAC) (10 μM), and 0.4 μL Taqman probes (5 μM) (G. duodenalis, Blastocystis, Cryptosporidium), 0.3 μL the water and 2.0 μL of DNA. The samples were processed by duplicate in an Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast equipment using default parameters of 40 cycles [13, 27, 29]. For the Entamoeba complex, conventional multiplex PCR was performed as previously reported [30]. We used DNA extracted from axenic cultures from G. duodenalis, Blastocystis, E. histolytica, E. dispar, E. moshkovskii and C. hominis as positive controls and fecal samples from patients from non-endemic regions that had previously tested negative for intestinal parasites by microscopy and qPCR as negative controls.

Genotyping for identifying G. duodenalis assemblages, Blastocystis subtypes and alleles, and Cryptosporidium species and subtypes

Genotyping was conducted for samples that were positive by qPCR for G. duodenalis, Blastocystis, and Cryptosporidium spp.. For identification of Giardia assemblages, these samples were subjected to conventional PCR using primers specific for the following molecular markers: (i) gdh (glutamate dehydrogenase) using primers GDHeF (5′-TCAACGTYAAYCGYGGYTTCCGT-3′), GDHiF (5′-CAGTACAACTCYGCTCTCGG-3′) and GDHiR (5′-GTTRTCCTTGCACATCTCC-3′) as reported elsewhere [31], and (ii) tpi (triose phosphate Isomerase) using primers AL3543 (5′-AAATIATGCCTGCTCGTCG-3′), AL3546 (5′-CAAACCTTITCCGCAAACC-3′), AL3544 (5′-CCCTTCATCGGIGGTAACTT-3′), and AL3545 (5′-GTGGCCACCACICCCGTGCC-3′) as reported elsewhere [32]. For identification of Blastocystis subtypes and alleles, SSU rRNA was amplified using primers RD5 (5′-ATCTGGTTGATCCTGTCCAG-3′) and BhRDr (5′-GAGTGCCTTTTTAACAACAACG-3′) as previously described [33]. Cryptosporidium spp. were identified using direct sequencing of the SSU rRNA fragment using primers 18SF (5′-AGTGACAAGAAATAACA ATACAGG3′) and 18SRv (5′-CCTGCTTTAAGCACTCTAATTTTC-3′) [34]. Subtyping of C. hominis and C. parvum was based on sequence analysis of gp60 genes. Each specimen was analyzed by the relevant method at least twice. Subtype families for C. hominis and C. parvum were determined based on sequence differences in the nonrepeat region of the gene. Within each subtype family, subtypes differed from one another, mostly in the number of serine-coding trinucleotide repeats (TCA, TCG, or TCT microsatellite) located in the 5′ region of the gene. The previously-established nomenclature system was used to differentiate subtypes within each subtype family as reported elsewhere [10].

Both strands of PCR products were sequenced using the dideoxy-terminal method for all genetic markers herein employed in a 310 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). Sequences were edited and aligned using MEGA 7.0 [35] and compared with reference sequences using BLAST. For Blastocystis, a database established for allele and subtype confirmation was queried (http://pubmlst.org/blastocystis/). In the case of G. duodenalis, a phylogenetic reconstruction was performed using maximum likelihood methods with 1,000 bootstrap replicates. Reference sequences contained in GenBank with the following accession numbers were included: AI (M84604), AII (AY178737), BIII (AF069059), BIV (AY178739), C (U60982), D (U60986), E (AY178741), E (AB182127), F (AB569384), G (AF069058), G (AY178745), H (GU176089). The phylogenetic tree was rooted with Giardia ardeae (AF069060). For Cryptosporidium, sequences were compared with species and subtype control sequences harbored at CDC, Atlanta and kindly provided by Dr. Lihua Xiao.

Statistical analyses

Descriptive statistics were used to analyze data of interest. Variables were classified as categorical or continuous. Categorical variables were summarized by relative frequencies and their association with the presence of intestinal protozoa (Blastocystis, G. duodenalis, Cryptosporidium spp. and members of the Entamoeba complex) was assessed using chi-square tests. The 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for each of the associations. For continuous variables, the normality of the data was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Means and standard deviations were used to summarize normally-distributed variables, while medians and interquartile ranges were used for variables with non-normal distributions. The means and medians of each continuous variable were compared by t-tests or Mann Whitney U tests, depending on the fulfillment of the assumption of normality. All analyses were performed in STATA version 14.0 and values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Concordance between microscopy and qPCR results was assessed by calculating the kappa index. A value of kappa close to one indicated that the results of both methods were concordant; and a value close to zero indicated that the methods were not concordant.

Results

Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infection

A total of 258 human fecal samples were analyzed by microscopy and 255 were analyzed by PCR (only for Blastocystis, G. duodenalis, Cryptosporidium spp. and Entamoeba complex). Three samples were not able to be analyzed by qPCR due to the low amount of the fecal sample that only allowed microscopy examination. Prevalence estimates by microscopy were 25.19% (65/258) for Blastocystis, 8.14% (21/258) for G. duodenalis, 0.78% (2/258) for members of the Entamoeba complex, 10.85% (28/258) for E. coli, 1.55% (4/258) for Chilomastix spp., 6.20% (16/258) for Endolimax nana and 0.38% (1/258) for Entamoeba hartmani (Fig. 1). Cryptosporidium spp. could not be identified by microscopy due to logistical limitations. No helminths were detected across the samples. The presence of the most frequent intestinal protozoa parasites in Colombia was detected by qPCR. Prevalence estimates by qPCR were 39.22% (100/255) for Blastocystis, 10.59% (27/255) for G. duodenalis, 9.8% (25/255) for Cryptosporidium spp. and 0.9% (1/255) for E. histolytica (Fig. 1). Eight samples of pet feces were analyzed by qPCR and two samples showed evidence of infection by intestinal protozoa. Blastocystis was identified in one sample and in the other sample, G. duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. were detected; curiously, the owner of the G. duodenalis and Cryptosporidium-infected pet was not infected by either of these parasites, as was the case for the owner of the Blastocystis-infected pet.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Frequency of intestinal parasites detected by microscopy, qPCR and PCR in the samples analyzed

Evaluation of polyparasitism

We found that among the stool samples analyzed by qPCR (for detection of Blastocystis, Giardia, and Cryptosporidium spp.) and conventional PCR (for detection of the Entamoeba complex), approximately 36% of individuals were infected by a single parasite, 11% were infected by two parasites and 1% were infected by three parasites (Fig. 2a). Using microscopy, we found that E. coli, Chilomastix spp., E. nana and E. hartmani were involved in polyparasitism (Fig. 2a). Using qPCR, we found that Blastocystis/G. duodenalis and Blastocystis/Cryptosporidium (Fig. 2b) coinfections occurred more frequently than G. duodenalis/Cryptosporidium coinfections (P < 0.05). Members of the Entamoeba complex were not involved in polyparasitism.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

a. Percentage of stool samples positive for 0–3 parasites by qPCR and microscopy. b. Polyparasitism identified by qPCR of Blastocystis, G. duodenalis, and Cryptosporidium spp. and polyparasitism identified by microscopy for other parasites

Comparison of the diagnostic performance of qPCR vs. microscopy

We analyzed the concordance between the qPCR and microscopy results and determined that qPCR was significantly more sensitive than microscopy for identification of Blastocystis (71.7% versus 56.1%, P < 0.05) and G. duodenalis (90% vs. 83.6%, P < 0.05). For samples testing positive both by microscopy and qPCR, Blastocystis was identified in 36.7% (n = 44) of samples by both techniques, in 16.7% (n = 20) of samples only by microscopy and in 46.7% (n = 56) of samples only by qPCR. The overall concordance between the two techniques was low, with a kappa index of 0.3551 (Fig. 3). G. duodenalis was identified in 46.8% (n = 22) of samples by both techniques, in 19.1% (n = 9) of samples only by microscopy and in 34% (n = 16) of samples only by qPCR. The kappa index was 0.3912 (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Analysis of concordance as shown by the kappa index between qPCR and microscopy measurements for identification of Blastocystis and G. duodenalis

Blastocystis subtypes, Giardia duodenalis assemblages and Cryptosporidium species

The prevalence rates of Blastocystis subtypes, G. duodenalis assemblages and Cryptosporidium spp. were assessed by genotyping samples that were positive by qPCR. A total of 62 Blastocystis samples that were qPCR-positive were successfully subtyped. The most common subtypes were ST1 (38.7%, n = 24), ST2 (14.52%, n = 9), ST3 (43.55%, n = 27) and ST4 (3.22%, n = 2). In addition, the different alleles associated with each subtype were identified. For ST1, alleles 4, 8, and 80 were identified; for ST2, alleles 11, 12, and 15 were identified; for ST3, alleles 151, 31, 34, 36, 38, and 57 were identified; and for ST4, alleles 42 and 91 were identified. ST1 allele 4 had the highest frequency, while the most frequent subtype was ST3 (Fig. 4a). The single pet fecal sample testing positive for Blastocystis was identified as ST1, allele 4 (Fig. 4a).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

a. Frequency of Blastocystis subtypes and alleles. b. Phylogenetic relationships of Giardia duodenalis inferred using neighbor-joining methods applied to gdh nucleotide sequences

Of the 27 samples testing positive for G. duodenalis by qPCR, only 12 could be genotyped using the gdh gene as no amplification products for Sanger sequencing were obtained from the remaining 15 samples. In the case of the tpi gene, multiple bands were observed after electrophoresis and were subsequently unable to be sequenced. The G. duodenalis assemblages identified were AII (8.3%, n = 1), BIII (50%, n = 6), BIV (33.3%, n = 4) and D (8.3%, n = 1) (Fig. 4b). The single dog fecal sample testing positive for G. duodenalis was genotyped as BIII. We also observed coinfection between Blastocystis STs and G. duodenalis in six samples. Coinfection occurred between the G. duodenalis BIII assemblage and Blastocystis ST1, ST2, and ST3; between the G. duodenalis BIV assemblage and Blastocystis subtypes ST2 and ST3; and between G. duodenalis assemblage D and Blastocystis subtype ST1.

Although 25 samples were qPCR-positive for Cryptosporidium spp., only four samples could be genotyped for gp60 and three samples for SSU-RNA. In three samples, C. parvum subtype IIa was identified and in one sample, C. hominis subtype IbA9G3R2 was identified. In the case of the single positive dog fecal sample, C. parvum subtype IIa was identified.

Association between sociodemographic variables and intestinal parasitism

Of the study population, similar proportions of participants were male (n = 134, 51.94%) and female (n = 124, 48.06%). The most common socioeconomic stratum of study participants was stratum one (80.62%), followed by stratum two (17.05%) and stratum three (2.33%). The vast majority (98.45%) of families had incomes lower than the minimum wage. However, 67.83% of families had their own homes, most with cement floors and brick walls, and 100% of the dwellings reported having an adequate system for sanitary elimination of excreta. Moreover, 99.61% of homes had access to water from treated aqueducts. The majority (88.76%) of children surveyed did not report gastrointestinal symptoms; only 6.2 and 3.49% reported diarrhea and abdominal pain, respectively. Characteristics of the study population are shown in Table 1. No statistically significant associations were identified between any variable and the presence of intestinal parasites.
Table 1

Sociodemographic variables studied under statistical analyzes

Variable

Category

Blastocystis

Giardia duodenalis

Cryptosporidium

Entamoeba histolytica/dispar/moshkovskii

Positive

Negative

P value

Positive

Negative

P Value

Positive

Negative

P Value

Positive

Negative

P Value

Sex

Female

28

96

0,352

9

115

0,618

12

111

0,98

0

124

0,172

Male

37

97

12

122

13

119

2

132

Stratum

1

49

159

0,305

17

191

0,746

22

184

0,543

2

206

0,785

2

15

29

4

40

3

40

0

44

3

1

5

0

6

0

6

0

6

Type of population

Urban

64

188

0,626

21

231

0,461

24

225

0,567

1

251

0,000

Rural

1

5

0

6

1

5

1

5

Children per housing

1

34

113

0,802

12

135

0,709

17

129

0,791

0

147

0,448

2

26

65

9

82

7

84

2

89

3

3

10

3

13

1

11

0

13

4

1

4

0

5

0

4

0

5

5

1

1

0

2

0

2

0

2

Pets

Yes

17

63

0,328

5

75

0,457

8

70

0,872

1

79

0,560

No

48

130

16

162

17

160

1

177

Water quality

Treated

65

192

0,561

21

236

0,766

25

229

0,741

2

255

0,929

Non-treated

0

1

0

1

0

1

0

1

P-value: < 0.05

Discussion

Popayán, Cauca, a city in the southwest of Colombia, is blessed with significant forestry and mining resources. However, according to the last census, 22.2% of the population had unsatisfied basic needs, reflecting mainly a lack of housing and to a lesser extent, inadequate coverage of services such as education, health, drinking water and basic sanitation. These factors facilitate the development of multiple infections among the population, including intestinal parasites. Therefore, epidemiological studies such as the present one are imperative to understand the epidemiological and molecular features of the intestinal protozoa (Blastocystis, G. duodenalis, Cryptosporidium and Entamoeba spp.) affecting the infant population in developing countries.

The protozoa of interest were identified using both microscopy and qPCR. Blastocystis had the highest prevalence using both methods followed by G. duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. (detected only by qPCR) (Fig. 1). These findings are consistent with a national survey of parasitism, which showed that Blastocystis, Giardia and Cryptosporidium spp. were the most prevalent protozoa [36] and also with estimates from Latin America. Surprisingly, members of the Entamoeba complex, despite having the highest prevalence rates in the country, were detected at low frequency in our study regardless of the method of detection. When reviewing previous studies of intestinal parasites affecting the local population (Popayán, Cauca), we found no reports of the prevalence of members of the Entamoeba complex. Therefore, it is possible that the population studied here had a low prevalence of these parasites. However, the poor agreement between diagnostic methods (PCR and microscopy) for identification of Entamoeba complex members may be due to a high rate of false positives in microscopy because amoebic trophozoites can be easily confused with leukocytes (particularly macrophages that have phagocytosed red blood cells) and cysts of other amoebas [37].

Although the traditional method for diagnosis of gastrointestinal parasites is microscopy, it showed a low sensitivity for the identification of intestinal protozoa in our study compared with qPCR (Fig. 1). Likewise, comparison of these methods using the kappa index (for detection of Blastocystis and G. duodenalis.) showed a low concordance (Fig. 3). In the case of the Entamoeba complex, concordance could not be analyzed due to insufficient data, given the low prevalence of these parasites. Our concordance findings are similar to other studies, with a greater parasite prevalence detected by qPCR compared with microscopy [27, 38]. A study carried out by Sánchez et al. [13] among indigenous communities of the Amazon basin also showed low concordance between these methods. These results including evidence from Argentina and Ecuador support the use of molecular methods instead of microscopy for diagnosis of intestinal parasites [8] and for monitoring of patients post-treatment [39]. For logistical reasons, we did not attempt microscopic identification of Cryptosporidium spp. in the present study. It is important to note that this process is carried out using the Ziehl-Neelsen technique (modified acid-fast staining). This method has some disadvantages: it requires at least 50,000–500,000 oocysts per gram of fecal matter as well as significant operator expertise so as not to confuse the oocyst with other acid- and alcohol-resistant microorganisms of similar size such as Cyclospora or yeasts [40]. Further studies comparing microscopy with molecular methods should be conducted to establish the true prevalence of this protozoan because it has been underestimated in most developing countries. Because the immune systems of young children are not fully developed, they are more susceptible to infection and this could explain the high prevalence observed in our study. However, this parasite has been listed as one of the main etiological agents of diarrhea in children; this was demonstrated in a multicenter study conducted in Africa and Asia, where it was established as the second causative agent of diarrhea in children [41].

Polyparasitism was evaluated in the study population by qPCR and microscopy (Fig. 2). This polyparasitism may be caused by a variable immune response that may be influenced by nutritional status and repeated exposures to intestinal parasites [45]. Polyparasitism is the result of simultaneous infection with various helminths and intestinal protozoa, and is associated with ecological and environmental factors, different routes of infection and different exposures to the host [1]. Polyparasitism is very important for public health because it has a significant impact on general morbidity, nutritional status, immune reaction after treatment, and re-infection rates, causing an increase in the intensity of infection for most patients. Infection by multiple parasite species confers increased susceptibility to other infections [46], and qPCR allows greater sensitivity in the identification of polyparasitism, making it a useful tool for the evaluation of public health interventions [47]. In Colombia, studies of polyparasitism have been carried out in indigenous communities and found that both helminths and protozoa were involved [48].

We performed genotyping of the protozoa detected in our study and established that the circulating Blastocystis subtypes in the population were ST1, ST2, ST3, and ST4 (Fig. 4). The subtype with the highest prevalence was ST3. These results are consistent with two previous reports in Colombia, one study of nine localities in Colombia and another of indigenous communities of the Amazon region; both studies also identified the ST3 subtype as having the highest prevalence [12, 13]. Similarly, a study that included subtyped samples from several geographic regions around the world identified subtypes ST1 to ST9. Approximately 90% of the isolates belonged to ST1, ST2, ST3 and ST4 and ST3 caused most human infections worldwide [10]. We detected allele 4 of ST1 most frequently, as has been previously described in Colombia [8, 13]. Interestingly, we also detected ST4 allele 42, which has been previously reported in Colombia at low frequency, and allele 91, which has never been previously reported in the country. Blastocystis ST4 has a more restricted geographic distribution because of its more recent colonization of humans; thus, alleles of this subtype are rarely detected in humans, and the 91 allele has been reported only in a study of Danish patients [49, 50]. By contrast, Blastocystis ST3 has been commonly identified from humans and non-human primates, and given its relatively high specificity for these hosts, infections are assumed to be caused by human-to-human transmission [7].

G. duodenalis assemblages A, B and D were identified in our study, and sub-assemblies AII, BIII, and BIV had higher prevalence than the BIV assemblage. The distribution of assemblages was not geographically limited, given that several studies carried out inside and outside the country revealed widely different distributions [16]. In Colombia, two studies conducted in specific areas of the country (one of clinical samples collected between 1997 and 2001 in the departments of Amazonas, Boyacá and Bogotá, and another conducted in the Amazon region) revealed that the most prevalent assemblage was A [13, 17]. However, other studies conducted using stool samples in central and Caribbean Colombia demonstrated a higher prevalence of assemblage B, similar to our study [1820]. Our study population, similar to a study conducted in the central region of Colombia [20], was largely asymptomatic. In both studies, there was no association between symptoms and presence of the G. duodenalis B assemblage; other studies of children in Australia and Brazil presented similar findings [5154]. These findings are contradicted by other studies, which suggested an association between severe diarrhea and this assemblage [55, 56].

Surprisingly, in our population we identified G. duodenalis assemblage D (Fig. 4b). This assemblage has been mainly detected in canines; however, a study conducted in German travelers identified assemblage D in two human samples originating in South Asia [57]. None of the canine fecal samples included in our study showed evidence of infection by G. duodenalis assemblage D. Therefore, the infection in this patient was likely to be transient. To verify this hypothesis, we would need to re-collect a fecal sample to establish the course of the infection. It would be beneficial to carry out additional studies in canines and humans to clarify our knowledge of the transmission dynamics of uncommon assemblages in humans and to evaluate the traceability of infections caused by them. Regarding Cryptosporidium spp., C. parvum and C. hominis (subtypes IIa and IbA9G3R2, respectively) were identified. These findings are consistent with the literature, as C. parvum and C. hominis are responsible for 90% of human infections. Likewise, C. parvum subtypes IIa and Ib are prevalent worldwide, and subtype IIa is considered to be predominant in humans and other animals [21, 22, 58].

In this study, the following protozoa were identified in stool samples from dogs: Blastocystis subtype ST1 allele 4, G. duodenalis assemblage BIII and C. parvum IIa. When comparing these results with those obtained from children, we found that the child living with the Blastocystis-infected dog was also infected by the same Blastocystis subtype and allele. By contrast, the child living with the Giardia- and Cryptosporidium-infected dog was not infected with either of these two protozoa. However, each of these parasites has been previously identified in both animals and humans, indicating that in our study population zoonotic transmission may have given rise to some of the infections [4244].

In Colombia, several studies of intestinal parasites have included the sociodemographic variables listed here (Table 1). These studies have reported a heterogeneous distribution of associations. A study conducted in Calarcá found a higher prevalence of intestinal parasitism in children who do not achieve growth and development controls and a significant association between infection with Blastocystis and non-deworming of pets [59]. Another study carried out in the indigenous reservation in Nasa, Cauca, did not find statistical associations between sociodemographic conditions and parasitism. However, the authors described factors such as: low education of parents and low availability of aqueduct and sewerage that may play a role [60]. Finally, a study carried out in preschoolers and schoolchildren in Cajamarca found an association between parasitism and level of education [61]. In our study, we did not find any statistically significant associations with demographic variables.

Conclusions

The qPCR had better sensitivity for identification of Blastocystis, G. duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp., which were detected at considerable frequency in the study population, with a higher prevalence of Blastocystis. The subtypes and alleles distributed in the population were determined and we identified an uncommon allele reported in humans (allele 91 of Blastocystis ST4). G. duodenalis assemblage D was identified in human feces, although this assemblage is typically found in canines. This may have represented possible zoonotic transmission because we detected these protozoa in canine feces. Our findings provide information for control entities about the distribution and transmission dynamics of intestinal parasites, which may help in implementation of strategies to reduce their prevalence in children.

Abbreviations

Blast: 

Basic Local Alignment Search Tool

Gdh: 

Glutamate dehydrogenase

Gp60: 

Glycoprotein 60

Mega: 

Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis

qPCR: 

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction

SSU rRNA: 

Small ribosomal ribonucleic acid subunit

ST: 

Sequence type

Tpi: 

Triose phosphate isomerase

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Edanz Group (www.edanzediting.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by DEPARTAMENTO ADMINISTRATIVO DE CIENCIA Y TECNOLOGIA-COLCIENCIAS, project “Desarrollo de una estrategia y plataforma de Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST) para la caracterización molecular de siete parásitos intestinales” code 122271250521 and contract number 130–2016 and by VICERECTORIA DE INVESTIGACIONES from Universidad del Cauca code 4204. The funders had no role in the design of the study, collection, analysis, interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

JDR reviewed the final version of the manuscript and supervised the project. GH performed the statistical analyses. LRV, MCL, AH, JCG, LB, LM and FG facilitated sample collection for the study, performed microscopy analyses and performed the DNA extraction. XV wrote the manuscript, analyzed the data and performed the molecular biology experiments. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This project was a minimum risk investigation for the participants and was approved by the ethics committee of the department of internal medicine of the Universidad del Cauca (number VRI024/2016). Because the participants were minors, written consent and informed consent were obtained from parents or guardians prior to sample collection. In the case of pet’s samples; the owners provided a written consent for sample collection.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Grupo de Investigaciones Microbiológicas-UR (GIMUR), Programa de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Matemáticas, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia
(2)
Centro de estudios en Microbiología y Parasitología (CEMPA), Departamento de Medicina Interna, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Cauca, Popayán, Colombia
(3)
Departamento de Salud Pública, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia
(4)
Programa de Biología, Universidad INCCA de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia

References

  1. Harhay MO, Horton J, Olliaro PL. Epidemiology and control of human gastrointestinal parasites in children. Expert Rev Anti-Infect Ther. 2010;8(2):219–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Ortiz Pineda, Carolina; Lopez Paez, Myriam Consuelo; Rivas Muñoz, Favio Aurelio “Prevalencia de helmintos en la planta de aguas residuales del municipio El Rosal, Cundinamarca,” Rev salud pública,vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 296–304, 2012.Google Scholar
  3. Cacciò SM, Thompson RCA, McLauchlin J, Smith HV. Unravelling Cryptosporidium and Giardia epidemiology. Trends Parasitol. 2005;21(9):430–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Sponseller JK, Griffiths JK, Tzipori S. The evolution of respiratory cryptosporidiosis: evidence for transmission by inhalation. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014;27(3):575–86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Tan KSW. New insights on classification, identification, and clinical relevance of Blastocystis spp. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2008;21(4):639–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Noël C, Dufernez F. Molecular phylogenies of Blastocystis isolates from different hosts: implications for genetic diversity, identification of species, and zoonosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(1):348.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Stensvold CR, Alfellani M, Clark CG. Levels of genetic diversity vary dramatically between Blastocystis subtypes. Infect Genet Evol. 2012;12(2):263–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Ramírez JD, Sánchez LV, Bautista DC, Corredor AF, Flórez AC, Stensvold CR. Blastocystis subtypes detected in humans and animals from Colombia. Infect Genet Evol. 2014;22:223–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Parkar U, et al. Molecular characterization of Blastocystis isolates from zoo animals and their animal-keepers. Vet Parasitol. 2010;169(1–2):8–17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Alfellani MA, Stensvold CR, Vidal-Lapiedra A, Onuoha ESU, Fagbenro-Beyioku AF, Clark CG. Variable geographic distribution of Blastocystis subtypes and its potential implications. Acta Trop. 2013;126(1):11–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Ramírez JD, et al. Geographic distribution of human Blastocystis subtypes in South America. Infect Genet Evol. 2016;41:32–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Ramírez JD, Flórez C, Olivera M, Bernal MC, Giraldo JC. Blastocystis subtyping and its association with intestinal parasites in children from different geographical regions of Colombia. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):1–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. A. Sánchez et al., “Molecular epidemiology of Giardia, Blastocystis and Cryptosporidium among indigenous children from the Colombian Amazon basin,” Front Microbiol, vol 8, no FEB, pp. 1–14, 2017.Google Scholar
  14. Ryan U, Cacciò SM. Zoonotic potential of Giardia. Int J Parasitol. 2013;43(12–13):943–56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Andrews RH, Monis PT, Ey PL, Mayrhofer G. Comparison of the levels of intra-specific genetic variation within Giardia muris and Giardia intestinalis. Int J Parasitol. 1998;28(8):1179–85.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Sprong H, Cacciò SM, Van Der Giessen JWB. Identification of zoonotic genotypes of Giardia duodenalis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009;3(12):1–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Ravid Z, Duque S, Arévalo A, Nicholls RS, Wasserman M. Genetic diversity of Giardia intestinalis populations in Colombia. Biomedica. 2007;27(1):34–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Arroyo-Salgado B, Buelvas-Montes Y, Villalba-Vizcaíno V, Salomón-Arzuza O. Caracterización genética por reacción en cadena de la polimerasa de Giardia intestinalis en muestras de humanos y perros del Caribe colombiano. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2014;32(7):424–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Rodriguez V, et al. Giardia duodenalis genotypes found in the Instituto Colombiano de Bienestar familiar day care centers and dogs in Ibague, Colombia. Biomedica. 2014;34(2):271–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Ramírez JD, et al. Molecular diagnosis and genotype analysis of Giardia duodenalis in asymptomatic children from a rural area in Central Colombia. Infect Genet Evol. 2015;32:208–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Azcona-Gutiérrez JM, et al. Molecular diversity and frequency of the diarrheagenic enteric protozoan Giardia duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. in a hospital setting in northern Spain. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):1–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Garcia-R JC, French N, Pita A, Velathanthiri N, Shrestha R, Hayman D. Local and global genetic diversity of protozoan parasites: spatial distribution of Cryptosporidium and Giardia genotypes. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11(7):1–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. López MC, et al. Molecular epidemiology of entamoeba: first description of Entamoeba moshkovskii in a rural area from Central Colombia. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):1–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Nino R, et al. Acta Tropica diagnosis of intestinal parasites in a rural community of Venezuela : advantages and disadvantages of using microscopy or RT-PCR. Acta Trop. 2017;167:64–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Haque R, et al. Prospective Case-Control Study of the Association between Common Enteric Protozoal Parasites and Diarrhea in Bangladesh. 2009;22908:1191–7. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2883291/.
  26. Cimino RO, et al. Identification of human intestinal parasites affecting an asymptomatic peri-urban Argentinian population using multi-parallel quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Parasit Vectors. 2015:1–7.Google Scholar
  27. Mejia R, et al. A novel, multi-parallel, real-time polymerase chain reaction approach for eight gastrointestinal parasites provides improved diagnostic capabilities to resource-limited at-risk populations. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013;88(6):1041–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Cristina I, et al. Evaluación de tres técnicas coproparasitoscópicas para el diagnóstico de geohelmintos intestinales. 26(1):15–24. http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/iat/v26n1/v26n1a02.pdf.
  29. Stensvold CR, Ahmed UN, Andersen LOB, Nielsen HV. Development and evaluation of a genus-specific, probe-based, internal-process-controlled real-time PCR assay for sensitive and specific detection of Blastocystis spp. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(6):1847–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Hamzah Z, Petmitr S, Mungthin M, Leelayoova S, Chavalitshewinkoon-Petmitr P. Differential detection of Entamoeba histolytica, Entamoeba dispar, and Entamoeba moshkovskii by a single-round PCR assay. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44(9):3196–200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Read CM, Monis PT, Thompson RCA. Discrimination of all genotypes of Giardia duodenalis at the glutamate dehydrogenase locus using PCR-RFLP. Infect Genet Evol. 2004;4(2):125–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Sulaiman IM, et al. Triosephosphate Isomerase Gene Characterization and Potential Zoonotic Transmission of Giardia duodenalis. 2003;9(11):15–7. https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/9/11/03-0084_article.
  33. Scicluna SM, Tawari B, Clark CG. DNA barcoding of Blastocystis. 2006;157:77–85. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16431158.
  34. Hunter PR, Hadfield SJ, Wilkinson D, Lake IR, Harrison FCD, Chalmers RM. Subtypes of Cryptosporidium parvum in humans and disease risk. 2007;13:1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17370519.
  35. Mol Biol Evol. 2016 Jul;33(7):1870-4. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
  36. Ministerio de Salud y Protección Social. U.D.a.E.N.D.P.I.E.P.E.M.U.D.A. El Ministerio. encuesta-nacional-de-parasitismo-2012-2014. 2015.Google Scholar
  37. Iasmin D, Cavalcanti DA, Vital IR. Prevalencia de infección por Entamoeba histolytica en escuelas públicas de la ciudad de Maceió, Alagoas, Brasil prevalence of infection caused by Entamoeba histolytica in public schools of Maceio city, Alagoas, Brazil. Rev Cubana Med Trop. 2013;65(1):4–12.Google Scholar
  38. Formenti F, et al. Molecular biology can change the classic laboratory approach for intestinal protozoan infections. 2017;8:1–6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29163458.
  39. Boadi S, Polley SD, Kilburn S, Mills GA, Chiodini PL. A critical assessment of two real-time PCR assays targeting the (SSU) rRNA and gdh genes for the molecular identi fi cation of Giardia intestinalis in a clinical laboratory. no table 1. 2014. p. 811–816.Google Scholar
  40. Tahvildar-biderouni F, Salehi N. Detection of Cryptosporidium infection by modified ziehl-neelsen and PCR methods in children with diarrheal samples in pediatric hospitals in Tehran. 2014;7(4):125–30. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4017569/.
  41. Kotloff KL, et al. Burden and aetiology of diarrhoeal disease in infants and young children in developing countries (the global enteric multicenter study, GEMS): a prospective, case-control study. Lancet. 2013;382(9888):209–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. M. Adell-aledón et al., “Occurrence and molecular epidemiology of Giardia duodenalis infection in dog populations in eastern Spain,” pp. 1–11, 2018.Google Scholar
  43. J. Wang et al., “Distribution and genetic diversity of Blastocystis subtypes in various mammal and bird species in northeastern China,” pp. 1–7, 2018.Google Scholar
  44. Gharieb RMA, Merwad AMA, Saleh AA, Abd El-Ghany AM. Molecular screening and genotyping. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2018;18(08):1–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Supali T, et al. Polyparasitism and its impact on the immune system. Int J Parasitol. 2010;40(10):1171–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. R. Pullan and S. Brooker, “Europe PMC Funders Group The health impact of polyparasitism in humans: are we under- estimating the burden of parasitic diseases?,” vol. 135, no. 7, pp. 783–794, 2009.Google Scholar
  47. L. Meurs et al., “Diagnosing Polyparasitism in a high- prevalence setting in Beira , Mozambique: Detection of Intestinal Parasites in Fecal Samples by Microscopy and Real-Time PCR,” pp. 1–18, 2017.Google Scholar
  48. Fernández-niño JA, et al. Perfiles de poliparasitismo intestinal en una comunidad de la Amazonia colombiana. Biomédica. 2017;37(3):368–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Stensvold, Rune C, Nielsen HV. Comparison of microscopy and PCR for detection of intestinal parasites in Danish patients supports an incentive for molecular. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(2):540–1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Stensvold CR, Christiansen DB, Elisabeth K, Olsen P, Nielsen HV. Short Report: Blastocystis sp . Subtype 4 is common in Danish Blastocystis -positive patients presenting with acute diarrhea. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011;84(6):883–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Cian A, et al. Molecular epidemiology of Blastocystis sp. in various animal groups from two French zoos and evaluation of potential zoonotic risk. PLoS One. 2017;12(1):1–29.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Yoshikawa H, et al. Molecular characterization of Blastocystis isolates from children and rhesus monkeys in Kathmandu, Nepal. Vet Parasitol. 2009;160(3–4):295–300.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Read C, Walters J, Robertson ID, Thompson RCA. Correlation between genotype of Giardia duodenalis and diarrhoea. Int J Parasitol. 2002;32(2):229–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Kohli A, et al. Giardia duodenalis assemblage, clinical presentation and markers of intestinal inflammation in Brazilian children. 2008. p. 718–25.Google Scholar
  55. Homan WL, Mank TG. Human giardiasis: genotype linked differences in clinical symptomatology. 2001;31:822–6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11403774.
  56. Enrique L, et al. Molecular analysis of Giardia duodenalis isolates from symptomatic and asymptomatic children from La Habana, Cuba. Parasite Epidemiol. Control. 2017;2(3):105–13.Google Scholar
  57. Broglia A, Weitzel T, Harms G, Cacció SM, Nöckler K. Molecular typing of Giardia duodenalis isolates from German travellers. Parasitol Res. 2013;10:3449–56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Wang R, et al. Cryptosporidium parvum IId family: clonal population and dispersal from Western Asia to other geographical regions. Sci Rep. 2014;4:1–5.Google Scholar
  59. Londoño Á, Mejía S, Gómez-Marín J. Prevalencia y Factores de Riesgo Asociados a Parasitismo Intestinal en Preescolares de Zona Urbana en Calarcá, Colombia. Rev salud pública. 2009;11(1):72–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Gaviria LM, et al. Prevalencia de parasitosis intestinal, anemia y desnutrición en niños de un resguardo indígena Nasa, Cauca, Colombia. Rev Fac Nac Salud Pública, Medellín. 2015;35(3):390–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Rinaldo MDPJ. Parasitosis intestinal en preescolares y escolares atendidos en el centro médico EsSalud de Celendin, Cajamarca. Horiz. Med. 2016;16(3):35–42.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2019

Advertisement