Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

HPV vaccination as preventive approach for recurrent respiratory papillomatosis - a 22-year retrospective clinical analysis

BMC Infectious Diseases201818:343

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-018-3260-0

©  The Author(s). 2018

  • Received: 26 February 2018
  • Accepted: 17 July 2018
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) is a rare, benign disease of the aerodigestive tract, especially the larynx, caused by infection with the human papillomavirus (HPV) types 6 or 11. Current management focuses on surgical debulking with microdebrider of papillomatous lesions with or without concurrent adjuvant therapy, e.g. Cidofovir®. This retrospective study evaluates the results of patients treated at a department of the university clinic between 1990 and 2012 and compares the results of the conventional treatment with a new treatment approach using adjuvant vaccination with Gardasil®.

Methods

A retrospective Kaplan Maier analysis of n = 24 patients diagnosed and treated with RPR was performed. The records were reviewed for gender, age at the time of first manifestation of disease and time to recurrence.

Results

Only n = 2 (15.4%) of the n = 13 vaccinated patients developed a recurrence of the disease after a mean time of 54.9 months (SD: 9.5 months). All patients who were not vaccinated (n = 11; 100%) developed a relapse after a mean time of 12.3 months (SD: 9.72 months).

Conclusion

We propose that adjuvant HPV vaccination with Gardasil® might have a preventive effect in RRP by occluding new papilloma formation.

Keywords

  • Recurrent respiratory papillomatosis
  • Human papillomavirus
  • Treatment approach
  • Microdebrider
  • Gardasil®
  • Vaccination
  • Cidofovir®

Background

Recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) is a rare disease affecting children and adults. The wart-like papillomas are caused by an infection with human papilloma viruses (HPV), the larynx being the most frequent localization. The morbidity of RRP is due to its high tendency of recurrence leading to repeated hospitalization with an enormous socioeconomic impact. The course of the RRP is difficult to predict as some patients can be cured whilst in other cases the infection may recur. A recurrence rate of 71.9% in juvenile papillomatosis and 22.8% in adults leads to the necessity of repeated operative interventions for years [1–3]. The cost of a patient suffering from RRP is estimated to be 60,000 to 470,000 USD [4]. Annually, RRP results in 15,000 surgical procedures causing annual cost of 150 million USD in the US [5]. In three to 7 % of RRP patients malignant propgression of the papillomas can be observed [6–8].

The treatment goals, besides virus elimination and curing the patient, are based on the reduction of papillomas, airway protection, prevention of spread and reduction of hospitalization [9, 10].

The gold standard treatment option is the surgical ablation of the papillomas with approximately 20% of patients requiring adjuvant drug therapy in addition to surgical treatment. In the adjuvant therapy of RRP Cidofovir® is one of the most commonly applied medications as it probably blocks virus replication by inducing apoptosis due to DNA damage [11, 12]. In the United States Cidofovir® has only been used intravenously to treat cytomegalovirus-induced retinitis in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. However, the therapeutic benefit in the treatment of RRP by means of intralesional injection is well documented [13–16]. In addition, a prophylactic vaccination against HPV types 6 and 11 is promising in the prevention of RRP. Currently, three vaccines are approved for the prevention of HPV infection of the anogenital tract: the bivalent vaccine Cervarix® (Glaxo-Smith-Kline), the tetravalent vaccine Gardasil® (Merck) and from 2016 on the nonavalent vaccine Gardasil 9 ® (Merck). The efficacy of Gardasil® is 100% against precancerous cervical lesions induced by HPV type 16 and type 18, 100% against genital warts caused by HPV 6/11 as well as 95% against highly differentiated vaginal neoplasia [17].

Although vaccination of patients with RRP has been discussed for years [18, 19], only anecdotal reports describe the promising therapeutic effect achieved by a Gardasil® immunization [20, 21].

The scope of this retrospective study is to evaluate the clinical results in patients diagnosed with RRP between 1990 and 2012 treated with microdebrider, intralesional Cidofovir® injection and adjuvant vaccination with Gardasil® (intramuscular injection of three doses: day 0, after 8 weeks and after 6 months) in order to investigate the effectiveness of this therapeutic approach in contrast to the conventional treatment without adjuvant vaccination.

Methods

This study was carried out according to the STROBE guidelines [22] and approval of the local ethics committee was obtained.

A retrospective Kaplan Meier analysis of all patients diagnosed with and treated for RRP at the university clinic between 1990 and 2012 was performed. All patients received surgical treatment with microdebridement of the papillomatous lesions and intralesional Cidofovir® injection. In patients who had agreed into the off-label use of Gardasil® the adjuvant vaccination was performed with intramuscular injection of three doses: day 0, after 8 weeks and after 6 months. There was no scientific intent. The records were reviewed for gender, age at the time of first manifestation of the disease and time to recurrence. In patients not vaccinated with Gardasil®, the time to the first relapse was considered; in vaccinated patients, the first relapse was assessed after the immunization had been completed. Blood analyses were taken and INNO-LiPA HPV Genotyping Extra® test (FujiReBio) was used to determine the human papillomavirus type.

The patient population consisted of n = 24 patients (11 female and 13 male). Patients younger than 12 years (n = 4, 3 female and 1 male) suffered from juvenile RRP according to the definition of Larson et al. [23]. Thus, n = 20 patients represented the group of adult RRP (8 female and 12 male) (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Flow chart showing the number of patients with adult and juvenile recurrent respiratory papillomatosis included in the study

Statistical evaluation of all data was performed using Microsoft Excel and IBM SPSS Statistics 20 (SPSS Inc., IBM Company, Chicago, IL). For quantitative data the arithmetic mean, minimum (min) and maximum (max), as well as standard deviation (SD) were calculated.

A two-sided log-rank test was used for comparison of the recurrence rates of vaccinated and non-vaccinated patients. A value of p < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistically significant differences. An alpha adjustment for multiple tests was not performed, thus the results have to be seen as explorative and descriptive.

Results

Between 1990 and 2012 n = 24 patients with RRP were treated in our clinic. N = 13 (54%) patients were treated with microdebridement, intralesional injection of Cidofovir® and adjuvant vaccination with Gardasil® (Fig. 1), n = 11 (46%) patients were treated with conventional microdebridement and intralesional Cidofovir® injection. The mean age at first manifestation was 2.97 years in juvenile RRP (min: 2 years, max: 5 years; SD: 1.46 years) and 48.36 years in adult RRP (min: 15 years, max: 73 years; SD: 17.91 years). Figure 2 shows the locations of laryngeal manifestations of the RRP. Table 1 shows the genotypic characterization of the HPV types in our patient population.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Graphic showing the location of laryngeal manifestation of the RRP in per cent [48]

Table 1

Table showing the number and percentage of HPV types in our patient population

Genotypic characterization of HPV in our patient population

HPV type

n = number of patients (per cent %)

juvenile RRP

adult RRP

type 6

1 (25%)

10 (50%)

type 11

1 (25%)

4 (20%)

type 6/11

1 (25%)

2 (10%)

type 6/16

1 (25%)

–

type 16

–

2 (10%)

type 6/52

–

1 (5%)

type 16/18

–

1 (5%)

total

4

20

Of the 13 patients vaccinated only n = 2 (15.4%) developed a recurrence of the disease, whereas all patients who were not vaccinated (n = 11; 100%) developed a recurrence during the maximum follow-up time of 86 months. The mean time to first recurrence was 12.3 months (SD: 9.72 months) in unvaccinated patients, and 54.9 months (SD: 9.5 months) in the two vaccinated patients (Fig. 3). Time to recurrence was significantly shorter in non-vaccinated patients than in the vaccinated population (log-rank test, p < 0.001). Mean number of operations necessary to treat the disease in unvaccinated patients and the n = 2 patients with local recurrence was 15.25 (SD: 11.4, min 5, max 27) in juvenile RRP and 4.8 (SD: 3.95, min 1, max 18) in adult RRP.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Kaplan Meier chart showing the time to recurrence of the disease in vaccinated and not-vaccinated patients

Discussion

We retrospectively evaluated the clinical results of 24 patients with RRP treated in our clinic between 1990 and 2012. In 11 patients (46%) therapy consisted of microdebridement and intralesional Cidofovir® injection, while 13 patients (53%) received additional vaccination with Gardasil®.

Even though the number of patients included in this retrospective study is limited, there are currently no studies comparable in cohort-size available in today’s literature.

In our patient population HPV type 6 dominated in 11 patients (45.8%) while HPV type 11 was found in 5 cases (20.8%). The distribution of HPV types in our study is consistent with the results of most previous reports demonstrating HPV type 6 and 11 isolations in 50–100% [24–31] with HPV types 16 and 18 being the second frequent cause for RRP [32–35].

Uloza et al. report a recurrence rate of 71.9% for juvenile papillomatosis and 22.8% for adult RRP [2]. They also show that the interval between relapses is 1 month to 10 years (mean 1.9 years) for the juvenile and 6 months to 9 years (mean 3.2 years) for adult RRP, respectively. Our results show, that only n = 2 (15.4%) of the vaccinated patients developed a recurrence of the disease after mean 54.9 months (SD: 9.5 months), whereas all patients who were not vaccinated (n = 11; 100%) developed a relapse after a mean time of 12.3 months (SD: 9.72 months), which shows a statistically significant difference in time to relapse (log-rank test, p < 0.001).

The basis of RRP therapy is surgical removal of the papillomas with either microdebrider or different types of lasers. We prefer microdebrider over laser-surgical techniques for ablation of the papillomas as the infected tissue is directly removed and the curved construction of the instrument permits a precise treatment of deeper laryngeal regions. Considering a number of about 4 operations necessary in the first year after diagnosis it becomes clear that a gentle and the most precise surgical approach is of great importance [36].

The therapeutic benefit of treating RRP by intralesional injection of Cidofovir® was demonstrated in many studies [13–15]. Chadha et al. summarized the literature on the treatment of RRP with Cidofovir® and concluded that in more than 80% of patients either complete or at least partial healing occurred [37]. A major advantage of intralesional injection is that locally high levels of the active compound are achieved without significantly increasing the plasma level of the drug [38]. When applying Cidofovir® the adverse effects such as nephrotoxicity, bone marrow damage, iritis and uveitis must always be considered. In vitro experiments have shown that Cidofovir ® provokes DNA damage that might promote malignant progression [39].

Currently three HPV vaccines are available. Cervarix ® (Glaxo-Smith-Kline) is a bivalent vaccine against the L1 protein of the HPV types 16 and 18. The HPV types 16 and 18 are the most common viruses causing cervical carcinoma. This vaccine however does not affect HPV types 6 and 11. Gardasil ® (Sanofi Pasteur-MSD / Merck) which we used in our patient population is a quadrivalent vaccine based on virus-like particles (VLP), from the main structural protein L1 from four different viruses thus immunizing against HPV types 6, 11, 16 and 18. Gardasil 9 ® (Sanofi Pasteur-MSD / Merck) is available since 2016 and protects against HPV types 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, und 58.

Numerous clinical studies have shown the safety and effectiveness of Gardasil ® in gynecological patients, and even though Gardasil ® does not cure an existing HPV infection it has been shown to induce a strong humoral immune reaction, which is up to 100-fold stronger than after a natural infection [40, 41]. In a recently published prospective study Novacovic et al. could show a statistically significant decline of the incidence of juvenile RRP after implementation of a national HPV vaccination program with Gardasil ® in Australia from 0.16 per 100,000 in 2012 to 0.02 per 100,000 in 2016 (p = 0.034) [42]. Above all, the results suggest that HPV vaccination results in high titers of neutralizing antibodies in individuals showing only a low level of antibody formation after natural infection [43] and by that may help to reduce recurrence or spread of the disease after surgical therapy [44]. While in our study population unvaccinated patients developed a recurrence after 12.3 months, we could extend this time to 54.3 months by vaccinating with Gardasil ®, which is consistent with the results of the case reports of Förster and Mudry [20, 21]. Tjon Pian Gi et al. performed a retrospective observational study in six RRP patients who received a quadrivalent HPV vaccine and measured HPV seroreactivity. Multiplex HPV serology was used to determine HPV- specific antibodies pre- and post-vaccination. Patients did not receive any adjuvant therapy 1 month before, neither during or after vaccination. They found that the quadrivalent HPV vaccine resulted in increased seroreactivity against the causal HPV in every patient [45].

The underlying mechanism of the vaccine’s apparent humoral response as an adjuvant treatment for RRP remains unknown [46]. One possible explanation could be that the underlying mechanism of recurrence is the result of incomplete removal of infected tissue actively producing virus and thereby causing local spread [47]. Therefore, the combination of complete surgical or chemical removal of existing lesions combined with the induction of sufficiently high antibody titers after vaccination and subsequent immunoglobulin secretion on the mucous membranes of the aerodigestive tract may help to prevent or delay recurrence [19, 46].

Because of that the authors think that the approach to combine an adjuvant HPV vaccination with surgical debridement and intralesional Cidofovir® injection is a promising treatment option for RRP.

Conclusions

Our clinical results after adjuvant immunization of 13 patients show a positive effect on the course of the RRP. After vaccination, the recurrence rate appears to be significantly lowered compared to international literature.

For this reason, the authors believe that HPV vaccination in RRP has a beneficial therapeutic effect by preventing the formation of new papillomas and immunization may prevent a spread of the infection.

Further studies are needed to investigate the complete mechanism of this novel treatment approach.

Abbreviations

HPV: 

Human papilloma virus

RRP: 

Recurrent respiratory papillomatosis

Declarations

Funding

There was no financial support of any kind of contribution to this publication. No grants were accepted/used for this publication. None of the authors has any personal or institutional financial interest in drugs, materials, or devices described in this submission.

Availability of data and materials

The original data and material are stored in an encrypted file only accessible to the authors and are not publicly available due to the recommendations of the local ethics committee but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

PSM and PG performed the essence of the development, analysis and writing this work. They were intensively supported by AS and TI. All listed authors made substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data, helped drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content and gave their final approval of the version to be published and their agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The research project with all its procedures was granted approval by the local Ethical Committee of the University of Tübingen and is in accordance with national law and the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki (1964) with its ethical principles for medical research involving Human Subjects and subsequent amendments. Only previously collected data were used in this study and no participants were involved. All patients had given informed written consent to their information being used in future studies.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department for Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Elfriede-Aulhorn-Str 5, DE-72076 Tübingen, Germany
(2)
Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, DE-72076 Tübingen, Germany
(3)
Division of Experimental Virology, Institute for Medical Virology, University Hospital of Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, DE-72076 Tübingen, Germany

References

  1. Derkay CS. Recurrent respiratory papillomatosis. Laryngoscope. 2001;111(1):57–69.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Uloza V. The course of laryngeal papillomatosis treated by endolaryngeal microsurgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2000;257(9):498–501.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Mauz PS, Zago M, Kurth R, et al. A case of recurrent respiratory papillomatosis with malignant transformation, HPV11 DNAemia, high L1 antibody titre and a fatal papillary endocardial lesion. Virol J. 2014;11:114.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Venkatesan NN, Pine HS, Underbrink MP. Recurrent respiratory papillomatosis. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2012;45(3):671–94. viii-ixView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Derkay CS. Task force on recurrent respiratory papillomas. A preliminary report. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995;121(12):1386–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Gaylis B, Hayden RE. Recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: progression to invasion and malignancy. Am J Otolaryngol. 1991;12(2):104–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Lie ES, Engh V, Boysen M, et al. Squamous cell carcinoma of the respiratory tract following laryngeal papillomatosis. Acta Otolaryngol. 1994;114(2):209–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Haedicke J, Iftner T. Human papillomaviruses and cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2013;108(3):397–402.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gallagher TQ, Derkay CS. Pharmacotherapy of recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: an expert opinion. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2009;10(4):645–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Derkay CS, Wiatrak B. Recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: a review. Laryngoscope. 2008;118(7):1236–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Pudszuhn A, Welzel C, Bloching M, Neumann K. Intralesional Cidofovir application in recurrent laryngeal papillomatosis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007;264(1):63–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Donne AJ, Rothera MP, Homer JJ. Scientific and clinical aspects of the use of cidofovir in recurrent respiratory papillomatosis. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;72(7):939–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Pransky SM, Albright JT, Magit AE. Long-term follow-up of pediatric recurrent respiratory papillomatosis managed with intralesional cidofovir. Laryngoscope. 2003;113(9):1583–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Mandell DL, Arjmand EM, Kay DJ, Casselbrant ML, Rosen CA. Intralesional cidofovir for pediatric recurrent respiratory papillomatosis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130(11):1319–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Co J, Woo P. Serial office-based intralesional injection of cidofovir in adult-onset recurrent respiratory papillomatosis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2004;113(11):859–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Wierzbicka M, Jackowska J, Bartochowska A, Jozefiak A, Szyfter W, Kedzia W. Effectiveness of cidofovir intralesional treatment in recurrent respiratory papillomatosis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;268(9):1305–11.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Villa LL. Overview of the clinical development and results of a quadrivalent HPV (types 6, 11, 16, 18) vaccine. Int J Infect Dis. 2007;11(Suppl 2):S17–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Freed GL, Derkay CS. Prevention of recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: role of HPV vaccination. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;70(10):1799–803.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Pawlita M, Gissmann L. Recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: indication for HPV vaccination? Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2009;134(Suppl 2):S100–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Mudry P, Vavrina M, Mazanek P, Machalova M, Litzman J, Sterba J. Recurrent laryngeal papillomatosis: successful treatment with human papillomavirus vaccination. Arch Dis Child. 2011;96(5):476–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Forster G, Boltze C, Seidel J, Pawlita M, Muller A. Juvenile laryngeal papillomatosis--immunisation with the polyvalent vaccine gardasil. Laryngorhinootologie. 2008;87(11):796–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Int J Surg. 2014;12(12):1500–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Larson DA, Derkay CS. Epidemiology of recurrent respiratory papillomatosis. APMIS. 2010;118(6–7):450–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Seedat RY, Thukane M, Jansen AC, Rossouw I, Goedhals D, Burt FJ. HPV types causing juvenile recurrent laryngeal papillomatosis in South Africa. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;74(3):255–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Obchinnikov Iu M, Kiselev VI, Soldatskii Iu L, et al. [Prevalence of human papilloma virus types and their influence on the course of the disease in children suffering from recurrent respiratory papillomatosis]. Vestn Otorinolaringol 2004(3):29–33.Google Scholar
  26. Gissmann L, Diehl V, Schultz-Coulon HJ, zur Hausen H. Molecular cloning and characterization of human papilloma virus DNA derived from a laryngeal papilloma. J Virol. 1982;44(1):393–400.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Mounts P, Shah KV, Kashima H. Viral etiology of juvenile- and adult-onset squamous papilloma of the larynx. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982;79(17):5425–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Gabbott M, Cossart YE, Kan A, Konopka M, Chan R, Rose BR. Human papillomavirus and host variables as predictors of clinical course in patients with juvenile-onset recurrent respiratory papillomatosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35(12):3098–103.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Duggan MA, Lim M, Gill MJ, Inoue M. HPV DNA typing of adult-onset respiratory papillomatosis. Laryngoscope. 1990;100(6):639–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Carifi M, Napolitano D, Morandi M, Dall'Olio D. Recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: current and future perspectives. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015;11:731–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Major T, Szarka K, Sziklai I, Gergely L, Czegledy J. The characteristics of human papillomavirus DNA in head and neck cancers and papillomas. J Clin Pathol. 2005;58(1):51–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Corbitt G, Zarod AP, Arrand JR, Longson M, Farrington WT. Human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes associated with laryngeal papilloma. J Clin Pathol. 1988;41(3):284–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Smith EM, Pignatari SS, Gray SD, Haugen TH, Turek LP. Human papillomavirus infection in papillomas and nondiseased respiratory sites of patients with recurrent respiratory papillomatosis using the polymerase chain reaction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993;119(5):554–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Arndt O, Johannes A, Zeise K, Brock J. High-risk HPV types in oral and laryngeal papilloma and leukoplakia. Laryngorhinootologie. 1997;76(3):142–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Torrente MC, Rodrigo JP, Haigentz M Jr, et al. Human papillomavirus infections in laryngeal cancer. Head Neck. 2011;33(4):581–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Armstrong LR, Derkay CS, Reeves WC. Initial results from the national registry for juvenile-onset recurrent respiratory papillomatosis. RRP Task Force. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;125(7):743–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Chadha NK, James AL. Antiviral agents for the treatment of recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: a systematic review of the English-language literature. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;136(6):863–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Naiman AN, Ceruse P, Coulombeau B, Froehlich P. Intralesional cidofovir and surgical excision for laryngeal papillomatosis. Laryngoscope. 2003;113(12):2174–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Donne AJ, Hampson L, He XT, Rothera MP, Homer JJ, Hampson IN. Cidofovir induces an increase in levels of low-risk and high-risk HPV E6. Head Neck. 2009;31(7):893–901.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Harper DM, Franco EL, Wheeler C, et al. Efficacy of a bivalent L1 virus-like particle vaccine in prevention of infection with human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 in young women: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;364(9447):1757–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Paavonen J, Jenkins D, Bosch FX, et al. Efficacy of a prophylactic adjuvanted bivalent L1 virus-like-particle vaccine against infection with human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 in young women: an interim analysis of a phase III double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;369(9580):2161–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Novakovic D, Cheng ATL, Zurynski Y, et al. A prospective study of the incidence of juvenile-onset recurrent respiratory papillomatosis after implementation of a national HPV vaccination program. J Infect Dis. 2018;217(2):208–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Villa LL, Ault KA, Giuliano AR, et al. Immunologic responses following administration of a vaccine targeting human papillomavirus types 6, 11, 16, and 18. Vaccine. 2006;24(27–28):5571–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Kang WD, Choi HS, Kim SM. Is vaccination with quadrivalent HPV vaccine after loop electrosurgical excision procedure effective in preventing recurrence in patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2-3)? Gynecol Oncol. 2013;130(2):264–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Tjon Pian Gi RE, San Giorgi MR, Pawlita M, et al. Immunological response to quadrivalent HPV vaccine in treatment of recurrent respiratory papillomatosis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;273(10):3231–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Young DL, Moore MM, Halstead LA. The use of the quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine (gardasil) as adjuvant therapy in the treatment of recurrent respiratory papilloma. J Voice. 2015;29(2):223–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Stamataki S, Nikolopoulos TP, Korres S, Felekis D, Tzangaroulakis A, Ferekidis E. Juvenile recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: still a mystery disease with difficult management. Head Neck. 2007;29(2):155–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Secondary 2018. http://www.abc-med.info/Krtan.htm. Accessed 10 Feb 2018.

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement

BMC Infectious Diseases

ISSN: 1471-2334

Contact us