Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Development of selective medium for IMP-type carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in stool specimens

  • Norihisa Yamamoto1, 2,
  • Ryuji Kawahara3,
  • Yukihiro Akeda1, 2Email author,
  • Rathina Kumar Shanmugakani1, 2,
  • Hisao Yoshida1, 2,
  • Hideharu Hagiya1, 2,
  • Naohiro Hara1,
  • Isao Nishi4,
  • Satomi Yukawa1,
  • Rumiko Asada5,
  • Yumi Sasaki6,
  • Kazuhiro Maeda6,
  • Noriko Sakamoto2,
  • Shigeyuki Hamada2 and
  • Kazunori Tomono1
Contributed equally
BMC Infectious DiseasesBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:229

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2312-1

Received: 17 December 2016

Accepted: 8 March 2017

Published: 24 March 2017

Abstract

Background

Identification of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) in faecal specimens is challenging. This fact is particularly critical because low-level carbapenem-resistant organisms such as IMP-producing CPE are most prevalent in Japan. We developed a modified selective medium more suitable for IMP-type CPE.

Methods

Fifteen reference CPE strains producing different types of β-lactamases were used to evaluate the commercially available CHROMagar KPC and chromID CARBA as well as the newly prepared MC-ECC medium (CHROMagar ECC supplemented with meropenem, cloxacillin, and ZnSO4) and M-ECC medium (CHROMagar ECC supplemented with meropenem and ZnSO4). A total of 1035 clinical samples were then examined to detect CPE using chromID CARBA and M-ECC medium.

Results

All tested strains producing NDM-, KPC-, and OXA-48-carbapenemases were successfully cultured in the media employed. Although most of the IMP-positive strains did not grow in CHROMagar KPC, chromID CARBA, or MC-ECC, all tested strains grew on M-ECC. When faecal samples were applied to the media, M-ECC medium allowed the best growth of IMP-type CPE with a significantly higher sensitivity (99.3%) than that of chromID CARBA (13.9%).

Conclusions

M-ECC medium was determined as the most favourable selective medium for the detection of IMP-type CPE as well as other types of CPE.

Keywords

Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae IMP Selective culture medium Faecal specimens

Background

Infection with carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) has been associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality [1, 2]. Regular surveillance of CPE is critically important to prevent the spread of these pathogens in healthcare settings [3]. The main reservoir of CPE is the intestinal tract, and faecal specimens are conventionally used for the screening of CPE. However, isolation of CPE from faecal specimens is difficult because CPE usually exists as a small proportion of the overall bacterial load [4, 5]. Furthermore, among several types of carbapenemases, enzymes such as OXA-48 and IMP have low capability of hydrolysing carbapenems [6]. These data indicate the difficulties in screening for CPE in stool specimens [35, 7].

Several phenotypic methods for CPE screening have been evaluated, but no standardised method has been established to date [4, 5]. Even highly carbapenem-resistant phenotypes such as NDM-type CPE are difficult to identify if cultured as a small inoculum in selective medium [8]. A similar phenomenon is observed when screening for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus [9]. The sensitivity of screening largely depends on the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the drug for the isolate and the bacterial load. This phenomenon is especially important in Japan because the most prevalent CPE in Japan are IMP-1 and IMP-6- types, which show low-level resistance to carbapenems. Furthermore, IMP-6-type isolates are generally susceptible to imipenem, but resistant to meropenem [10, 11]. Therefore, IMP-type CPE is occasionally misidentified in laboratory examinations and is referred to as ‘stealth-type CPE’ to draw attention to this type of CPE [11]. Several reports indicated difficulties in screening for OXA-48-type isolates, which are widely known to display low-level resistance [12]. Meanwhile, a reliable phenotypic method for IMP-type CPE has not been investigated [4]. In this study, we developed a selective medium for IMP-type CPE.

Methods

Bacterial isolates, clinical specimens, and ethical statements

Four selective culture media (vide infra) were examined with bacterial isolates as well as clinical faecal specimens. Fifteen CPE isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and five non-CPE isolates were used (Table 1). The MICs of meropenem and imipenem for each isolate were determined using Etest strips (bioMérieux Clinical Diagnostics, Marcy l’Etoile, France), and the genotypic characteristics of each isolate with respect to carbapenemase and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) genes were determined via PCR as previously described [13].
Table 1

Properties of the bacterial strains used and average recoveries of CFU on each selective agar medium

Strain

Species

Type of β-lactamase

MIC (mg/L)

% CFU compared to that of each strain grown in MHA

  

Carbapenemase

ESBL

MEPM

IPM

CHROMagar KPC

chromID CARBA

MC-ECC

M-ECC

1504-16

Escherichia coli

IMP-6

CTX-M-15, CTX-M-2

8

0.5

0*

0*

91

97

1502-08

E. coli

IMP-6

-

8

0.5

0*

0*

0*

42*

1405-06

E. coli

IMP-6

CTX-M-15, CTX-M-2

3

0.38

0*

0*

74

91

1502-25

E. coli

IMP-6

CTX-M-2

3

3

44*

112

80

98

1409-10

Klebsiella pneumoniae

IMP-6

CTX-M-2

1

0.19

0*

0*

4*

95

1502-02

K. pneumoniae

IMP-6

-

4

0.25

0*

0*

3*

123

1409-09

K. pneumoniae

IMP-6

CTX-M-2

0.5

0.25

0*

0*

0*

27*

1212-13

K. pneumoniae

IMP-6

CTX-M-2

0.5

0.25

0*

0*

8*

66

1412-36

K. pneumoniae

IMP-1

CTX-M-2

3

0.5

0*

0*

33*

97

1502-06

K. pneumoniae

IMP-1

-

1

1

0*

114

75

74

1011-12

K. pneumoniae

KPC-2

-

>32

>32

97

93

93

100

BAA-1705

K. pneumoniae

KPC-2

-

32

32

109

115

157

155

BAA-2470

K. pneumoniae

NDM-1

CTX-M-15

16

32

41

112

119

116

BAA-2471

E. coli

NDM-1

CTX-M-15

>32

>32

138

114

170

149

TRKP-54

K. pneumoniae

OXA-48

-

16

32

99

89

105

95

1502-04

Enterobacter cloacae

-

-

2

2

10*

0*

0*

21*

1012-01

Serratia marcescens

-

-

6

>32

3*

113

127

98

1104-18

E. cloacae

-

-

0.19

0.5

0*

0*

0*

0*

1004-112

E. coli

-

CTX-M-2

0.016

0.25

0*

0*

0*

0*

1004-25

K. pneumoniae

-

CTX-M-2

0.032

0.38

0*

0*

0*

0*

ESBL extended-spectrum β-lactamase, MEPM meropenem, IPM imipenem, MHA Mueller-Hinton agar

*p < 0.01

Faecal samples were collected from 30 hospitals in northern Osaka in December 2015 through the regional surveillance project performed by Osaka University, four regional public health centres, and Osaka Prefectural Institute of Public Health. Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethical Review Boards of each institution.

Evaluation of selective agar using bacterial isolates

Bacteria in the stool of colonised patients are typically present at low abundances [3, 4], although the inoculum size used to determine CLSI susceptibility breakpoints and MICs ranged from 104 cells per spot (agar dilution) to 5 × 105 cells per millilitre (broth microdilution) [14]. Therefore, to simulate experiments using stool samples, we inoculated each plate with approximately 102 CFU and compared the CFU counts in selective agar media as previously described [8]. Overnight cultures of each isolate in brain-heart infusion broth (BD Diagnostic Systems, Detroit, MI, USA) were serially diluted and inoculated in triplicate plates. CFU counts were compared among Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA) (BD Diagnostic Systems) as well as two commercial and two in-house prepared agar media: (1) chromID CARBA (bioMérieux, Paris, France), (2) CHROMagar KPC (CHROMagar Microbiology, Paris, France), (3) MC-ECC medium (CHROMagar ECC [CHROMagar Microbiology] supplemented with 0.25 μg/mL meropenem, 250 μg/mL cloxacillin, and 70 μg/mL ZnSO4), and (4) M-ECC medium (CHROMagar ECC supplemented with 0.25 μg/mL meropenem and 70 μg/mL ZnSO4). Each plate was incubated at 37 °C for 24 h, and the percent recovery was calculated as the average colony count of a given isolate divided by that in MHA. The difference in the CFU count between MHA and each selective medium was assessed using a two-tailed Student’s t test with GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA).

Evaluation of selective agar using stool specimens

Clinical faecal specimens from the patients were collected with Seed Swab No. 1 (Eiken Chemical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and stored at 4 °C until examination. The samples were inoculated directly from the swab into chromID CARBA medium and M-ECC medium without pre-incubation. Positive colonies were selected as defined by the manufacturer’s instructions and examined for specification of bacterial isolates and antimicrobial susceptibility using a MicroScan WalkAway Plus system (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). The results were interpreted according to the 2012 guidelines (M100-S22) of the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (Wayne, PA, USA). When the isolates showed intermediate or resistance to meropenem or imipenem, their carbapenemase genotypes were analysed by PCR as previously described [13]. An isolate positive for the bla IMP gene was further analysed to identify the bla IMP-1 or bla IMP-6 type by sequencing the acquired amplified products using a primer set targeting bla IMP (IMP-1_469F: TTTATATTTTTGTTTTGCAGCATTGC; IMP-1_1277R: CGCGTTGTGGAATACTTTGC). Sensitivity and specificity of media for bla IMP-type CPE identification were calculated using GraphPad Prism software.

Results and discussion

We evaluated three major selective media, the chromID CARBA, CHROMagar KPC, and MC-ECC that was made in reference to SuperCarba medium [15]. The NDM-, KPC-, and OXA-48-positive strains were recovered with both chromID CARBA and CHROMagar KPC, but eight IMP-positive strains were not recovered in any selective media (Table 1). MC-ECC showed better recoveries than chromID CARBA and CHROMagar KPC, although six IMP-positive strains were not recovered. This result is similar to previous reports [7, 16, 17]. IMP-producing CPE was also difficult to detect when a small number was inoculated.

Several reports indicated that commercially available SuperCarba, chromID OXA-48, and chromID ESBL are favourable selective media [2, 12, 15, 18]. Unfortunately, neither SuperCarba nor chromID OXA-48 was available in Japan at the time of our research, and chromID ESBL is not appropriate for CPE detection due to the high prevalence of ESBL in Japan [19]. Therefore, we developed MC-ECC medium as an in-house SuperCarba. Surprisingly, however, a significant reduction in the apparent CFU was observed in six out of the 10 IMP-positive isolates plated on MC-ECC medium. This result could be explained by our supplementary experiment indicating that the MIC of meropenem for IMP-type strains decreases when cloxacillin is added (Additional file 1: Table S1). Therefore, we removed cloxacillin from the MC-ECC medium to increase the sensitivity and referred to the resulting medium as M-ECC. As a result, all CPE strains could be detected in M-ECC medium (Table 1).

In the next series of experiments, a total of 1024 stool samples and 11 rectal swabs were examined to compare the capability of M-ECC and chromID CARBA to detect CPE in stool samples. The average time interval from sample acquisition to examination was 4.66 ± 2.66 days. Positive colonies were obtained in 149 specimens using M-ECC, though six of them did not contain CPE following further examination (Additional file 2: Table S2). Five of the six false-positive samples whose MIC against meropenem was more than 0.25 μg/mL could be grown in M-ECC medium. One sample contained susceptible Enterobacteriaceae alone, which might be grown together with carbapenem resistant non-fermenting gram-negative rods such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In contrast, only 20 specimens gave positive colonies when chromID CARBA was used; all contained CPE. M-ECC medium provided significantly higher sensitivity (99.3%) than chromID CARBA (13.9%) (Table 2).
Table 2

Sensitivity and specificity of M-ECC and chromID CARBA to detect bla IMP-positive CPE in stool specimens

Method

 

bla IMP

Sensitivity (%) (95% CI)

Specificity (%) (95% CI)

PPV (%) (95% CI)

NPV (%) (95% CI)

PLR

Positive

(n = 144)

Negative

(n = 891)

M-ECC

Positive

143

6

99.3 (96.2–100.0)

99.3 (98.5–99.8)

96.0 (91.4–98.5)

99.9 (99.3–100.0)

147.5

Negative

1

885

ChromID

CARBA

Positive

20

0

13.9 (8.7–20.6)

100.0 (99.6–100.0)

100.0 (83.2–100.0)

87.8 (85.6–89.7)

NA

Negative

124

891

CI confidential interval, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value, PLR positive likelihood ratio, NA not applicable

Removing cloxacillin may contribute to high sensitivity of M-ECC medium. Meanwhile, it did not contain inhibitors preventing the overexpression of AmpC and efflux pumps expressed by bacteria and non-carbapenemase producing CRE can grow in M-ECC medium [20, 21]. Therefore, further identification such as PCR was necessary to confirm isolates as CPE.

This study contains several limitations. First, we examined M-ECC medium with stool specimens containing IMP-positive CPE alone because other types are rarely found in Japan. Secondly, the amount of clinical specimens directly applied in each assay was not perfectly identical because the stool specimens were not homogeneous, and the inoculated specimens were not similar even though we used the same swab. Finally, we did not sufficiently evaluate M-ECC medium with non-CPEs and it may show lower specificity. However, in order to obtain accurate epidemiology, sensitivity is more important, and M-ECC medium should be the most suitable for CPE screening in this study.

Conclusions

Our results indicated the difficulty in detecting IMP-type CPE with available selective media. However, we successfully developed a more selective medium, M-ECC medium, for IMP-type CPE, which would be useful in IMP-type CPE prevalent regions like Japan.

Abbreviations

CPE: 

Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was supported by the Community-based Health Promotion Project from Osaka Prefecture, the Infection Control Budget from Osaka University Hospital, Japan Initiative for Global Research Network on Infectious Diseases (J-GRID) from Ministry of Education, Culture, Sport, Science and Technology in Japan (MEXT), and Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED).

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its Additional files.

Authors’ contributions

Conception and design of the study: YA and KT. Analysis and interpretation of the data: NY, RK, YA, SRK, HY, HH, NH, IN, SY, and RA. Collection and assembly of the data: NY, RK, YA, SRK, HY, HH, NH, IN, SY, RA, YS, MK, and NS. Drafting of the article: NY and RK. Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: YA, SH, and KT. Final approval of the article: YA, SH, and KT. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethical Review Boards of Osaka University, four regional public health centres, and Osaka Prefectural Institute of Public Health. Because stool samples could be obtained as a part of routine clinical care, informed consent was omitted as they approved. Instead, the patients were informed of the research procedure and their option to waive their rights via posters and the website for each hospital.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Infection Control and Prevention, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine
(2)
Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University
(3)
Department of Bacteriology, Osaka Prefectural Institute of Public Health
(4)
Laboratory for Clinical Investigation, Osaka University Hospital
(5)
Ibaraki Public Health Center
(6)
Clinical Laboratory Department Section 1, The Research Foundation for Microbial Diseases of Osaka University

References

  1. Carmeli Y, Akova M, Cornaglia G, Daikos GL, Garau J, Harbarth S, Rossolini GM, Souli M, Giamarellou H. Controlling the spread of carbapenemase-producing Gram-negatives: therapeutic approach and infection control. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010;16(2):102–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Nordmann P, Poirel L. Strategies for identification of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013;68(3):487–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Vrioni G, Daniil I, Voulgari E, Ranellou K, Koumaki V, Ghirardi S, Kimouli M, Zambardi G, Tsakris A. Comparative evaluation of a prototype chromogenic medium (ChromID CARBA) for detecting carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in surveillance rectal swabs. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(6):1841–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Viau R, Frank KM, Jacobs MR, Wilson B, Kaye K, Donskey CJ, Perez F, Endimiani A, Bonomo RA. Intestinal Carriage of Carbapenemase-Producing Organisms: Current Status of Surveillance Methods. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2016;29(1):1–27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Humphries RM, McKinnell JA. Continuing Challenges for the Clinical Laboratory for Detection of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53(12):3712–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Nordmann P, Gniadkowski M, Giske CG, Poirel L, Woodford N, Miriagou V, European Network on Carbapenemases. Identification and screening of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18(5):432–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Simner PJ, Martin I, Opene B, Tamma PD, Carroll KC, Milstone AM. Evaluation of multiple methods for the detection of gastrointestinal colonization of carbapenem-resistant organisms from rectal swabs. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54(6):1664–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Tanner WD, Atkinson RM, Goel RK, Porucznik CA, Benson LS, VanDerslice JA. Effect of Meropenem Concentration on the Detection of Low Numbers of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;60(1):712–3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Wijesuriya TM, Perry P, Pryce T, Boehm J, Kay I, Flexman J, Coombs GW, Ingram PR. Low vancomycin MICs and fecal densities reduce the sensitivity of screening methods for vancomycin resistance in Enterococci. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52(8):2829–33.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Hayakawa K, Miyoshi-Akiyama T, Kirikae T, Nagamatsu M, Shimada K, Mezaki K, Sugiki Y, Kuroda E, Kubota S, Takeshita N, et al. Molecular and epidemiological characterization of IMP-type metallo-beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacter cloacae in a Large tertiary care hospital in Japan. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(6):3441–50.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Kayama S, Shigemoto N, Kuwahara R, Oshima K, Hirakawa H, Hisatsune J, Jove T, Nishio H, Yamasaki K, Wada Y, et al. Complete nucleotide sequence of the IncN plasmid encoding IMP-6 and CTX-M-2 from emerging carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in Japan. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59(2):1356–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Girlich D, Anglade C, Zambardi G, Nordmann P. Comparative evaluation of a novel chromogenic medium (chromID OXA-48) for detection of OXA-48 producing Enterobacteriaceae. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013;77(4):296–300.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dallenne C, Da Costa A, Decre D, Favier C, Arlet G. Development of a set of multiplex PCR assays for the detection of genes encoding important beta-lactamases in Enterobacteriaceae. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65(3):490–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; approved standard, vol. 32. 9th ed. Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2012.Google Scholar
  15. Nordmann P, Girlich D, Poirel L. Detection of carbapenemase producers in Enterobacteriaceae by use of a novel screening medium. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(8):2761–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Anderson KF, Lonsway DR, Rasheed JK, Biddle J, Jensen B, McDougal LK, Carey RB, Thompson A, Stocker S, Limbago B, et al. Evaluation of methods to identify the Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase in Enterobacteriaceae. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45(8):2723–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Girlich D, Poirel L, Nordmann P. Comparison of the SUPERCARBA, CHROMagar KPC, and Brilliance CRE screening media for detection of Enterobacteriaceae with reduced susceptibility to carbapenems. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013;75(2):214–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Perry JD, Naqvi SH, Mirza IA, Alizai SA, Hussain A, Ghirardi S, Orenga S, Wilkinson K, Woodford N, Zhang J, et al. Prevalence of faecal carriage of Enterobacteriaceae with NDM-1 carbapenemase at military hospitals in Pakistan, and evaluation of two chromogenic media. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66(10):2288–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Luvsansharav UO, Hirai I, Niki M, Nakata A, Yoshinaga A, Yamamoto A, Yamamoto M, Toyoshima H, Kawakami F, Matsuura N, et al. Fecal carriage of CTX-M beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in nursing homes in the Kinki region of Japan. Infect Drug Resist. 2013;6:67–70.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Opperman TJ, Nguyen ST. Recent advances toward a molecular mechanism of efflux pump inhibition. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:421.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Robert J, Pantel A, Merens A, Meiller E, Lavigne JP, Nicolas-Chanoine MH, group ONscrs. Development of an algorithm for phenotypic screening of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in the routine laboratory. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17(1):78.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017