Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Development of Aspergillosis in a cohort of non-neutropenic, non-transplant patients colonised by Aspergillus spp

  • José Barberán1Email author,
  • Francisco-Javier García-Pérez2,
  • Victoria Villena3,
  • Alberto Fernández-Villar4,
  • Eduardo Malmierca5,
  • Cristina Salas6,
  • María-José Giménez7,
  • Juan-José Granizo8,
  • Lorenzo Aguilar7 and
  • on behalf of the working group on Infectious Diseases from the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine
BMC Infectious DiseasesBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:34

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-2143-5

Received: 21 July 2016

Accepted: 20 December 2016

Published: 6 January 2017

Abstract

Background

A previous study explored factors discriminating colonization and true infection among non-transplant, non-neutropenic patients with repeated Aspergillus spp. isolation from lower respiratory samples. The present study explored the evolution of patients with Aspergillus colonization in that study to determine the percentage of cases progressing to aspergillosis and time to development.

Methods

Clinical records were retrospectively reviewed (for each patient from his end date in the past study) and data from all respiratory processes suffered by patients up to April 2015 were recorded. Comparisons of variables were performed between colonized patients that developed aspergillosis and those that did not. A Kaplan-Meier curve was used to describe time to development of aspergillosis in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients for II-IV stages of the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) classification.

Results

Sixty seven colonized patients were followed, 12 of them (17.9%) developed aspergillosis. Diagnoses included six tracheobronchitis (4 invasive, 2 simple tracheobronchitis), four pulmonary disease (2 invasive pulmonary aspergillosis, 2 chronic pulmonary aspergillosis), one allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis and one pulmonary aspergilloma. Up to 47 (70.4%) of the study patients presented COPD. Among patients developing aspergillosis COPD was more frequent (100%) than among those that did not develop aspergillosis (35 out of 55; 63.6%) (p = 0.012), as well as GOLD IV patients were more frequent among COPD patients developing aspergillosis than among COPD patients that did not (50.0 vs. 26.1%, p = 0.046). Mean time to development of aspergillosis was 18.4 months (median: 8.5) with a wide range (1–58). Overtime, the percentage of patients developing aspergillosis was significantly higher among GOLD IV patients than among GOLD II-III patients (p = 0.032).

Conclusions

The high percentage of cases progressing to aspergillosis among colonized patients, especially among those with COPD (25.5%), stresses the importance of colonization as risk factor, and creates awareness of the possible change from colonization to invasive disease in GOLD IV patients.

Keywords

Aspergillosis Colonization COPD Aspergillus Incubation period

Background

The significance of Aspergillus colonization is unclear because it may represent a temporary passage, a long-term benign carriage or a sign preceding invasive disease, with scarce information on the length of the incubation period [1, 2]. A previous study by our group explored implications of repeated isolation of Aspergillus spp. from lower respiratory samples in non-transplant, non-neutropenic patients in an attempt to identify factors helping in discriminating colonization and true infection [3]. One important finding was the high number of patients with probable/proven aspergillosis among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [3], including GOLD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) II patients [4].

The cohort of patients categorized as colonized in the previous study offered the opportunity to explore the possible progression and time to development of aspergillosis in non-transplant, non-neutropenic patients as previously explored for post-lung transplant patients [5] and patients with acute myeloid leukemia [6].

The aim of the present follow-up study was to explore the evolution of colonized patients from the cohort identified in the previous study [3] to determine the percentage of cases progressing to aspergillosis and time to development.

Methods

A retrospective review of clinical records of patients categorized as Aspergillus-colonized patients in a previous study [3, 4] was performed. The inclusion criterion was Aspergillus-colonized patients defined as patients with at least two cultures of lower respiratory samples (good quality sputum) yielding Aspergillus spp. without dyspnoea exacerbation, bronchospasm, new pulmonary infiltrates or symptoms attributable to Aspergillus in the previous study. A total of 106 colonized patients were identified in the database of the previous study, 93 of them surviving at the time of study closure [3]. Centres (22 centres) that attended these 93 patients were contacted and invited to participate in the present follow-up, and 17 of them agreed. In these participating centres, a total of 67 colonized patients were followed-up. Clinical records were retrospectively reviewed, and clinical data from all medical visits/hospital admissions due to respiratory symptoms suffered by these patients (whether as outpatients or inpatients, and regardless the aetiology of infections) from the end date of the past study (individualized for each patient) to April 2015 were recorded. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hospital Universitario Monteprincipe, Madrid, Spain.

Demographic data, underlying illnesses, clinical and radiological data, laboratory data, previous treatments (corticosteroids, antibiotics, antifungals…), antifungal treatment and outcome were recorded. The Charlson comorbidity index and its correction by age [7, 8], the modified McCabe score (Sabadell score) [9], and the Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score were retrospectively calculated, as well as the GOLD classification for COPD patients [10]. When more than one respiratory episode was recorded during the follow-up period, data from the episode where aspergillosis was diagnosed or data corresponding to the last episode (for patients not developing aspergillosis) were considered.

Diagnoses of tracheobronchitis were always based on bronchoscopy reports included in clinical records. Simple tracheobronchitis was considered when the bronchoscopy report described mucosal inflammation and mucus secretions, and invasive tracheobronchitis when ulceration and pseudomembrane formation was observed [3, 11]. Diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis was based on a host factor criterion (COPD), clinical criteria (dyspnoea exacerbation, bronchospasm, new pulmonary infiltrates or other new respiratory symptoms…), and mycological criteria [2]. Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis was considered when long-term fibrotic lesions with or without necrosis or cavitations had been recorded in the patient’s clinical records [3, 12]. Aspergilloma was considered on a radiological basis (upper-lobe, mobile, intracavitary mass) [12, 13]. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) was considered in patients with asthma/cystic fibrosis based on clinical data (worsening or appearance of new respiratory symptoms), analytical data (including specific immunoglobulins) and radiological data [14].

Comparisons of variables between colonized patients that developed aspergillosis and those that did not were performed by the χ2 test and the Fisher’s exact test, when necessary. For quantitative variables, since data did not show normality in the Kolmogorov – Smirnoff test, the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests, when necessary, were used. For each patient developing aspergillosis, time from colonization to infection was calculated considering the date of his first positive Aspergillus culture (in the previous study) and the visit/admission date (in the present follow-up) when the diagnosis of aspergillosis was made. A Kaplan-Meier curve was used to describe time to development of aspergillosis. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v 14 programme (SPSS Inc., Chicago IL).

Results

Twelve of the 67 colonized patients (17.9%) included in this follow-up study developed aspergillosis. Table 1 shows characteristics of patients distributed by development of aspergillosis or not. During the study period, patients suffered several episodes of respiratory infections, the number of episodes being higher among patients developing aspergillosis, although the difference did not reach significance. No differences between groups were found in values of clinical index/scores or ICU admission. Forty-seven of the 67 (70.4%) colonized patients presented COPD: all patients developing aspergillosis were COPD patients and 35 out of 55 (63.6%) of those not developing aspergillosis presented COPD, the difference being statistically significant (p = 0.012). Colonising species were identified as Aspergillus fumigatus in 46 (68.7%) patients, Aspergillus niger in three (4.5%) and Aspergillus flavus in two (3.0%) patients, the remaining being reported as Aspergillus spp. Non-fumigatus species were isolated from 2/12 (16.7%) patients developing aspergillosis and 19/55 (34.5%) from those that did not (p = 0.313).
Table 1

Characteristics of patients distributed by development or not of aspergillosis

 

Total

Developing aspergillosis

p

  

No

Yes

 

n

67

55

12

 

No. respiratory episodes; median (IQR)

2 (1.0–4.0)

2 (1.0–3.0)

3 (2.0–4.8)

0.061

Age; mean ± SD

73.1 ± 14.9

73.7 ± 15.4

70.2 ± 12.7

0.468

≥70 years

48 (71.6)

49 (72.7)

8 (66.7)

0.729

COPD

47 (70.4)

35 (63.6)

12 (100)

0.012

GOLD category

 III

17 (29.3)

14 (30.4)

3 (25.0)

1.000

 IV

18 (31.0)

12 (26.1)

6 (50.0)

0.046

Diabetes mellitus II

13 (19.4)

11 (20.0)

2 (16.7)

1.000

Congestive heart failure

9 (13.4)

7 (12.7)

2 (16.7)

0.658

Liver disease

7 (10.4)

5 (9.1)

2 (16.7)

0.600

Chronic renal insufficiency

7 (10.4)

7 (12.7)

0 (0.0)

0.336

Charlson index; mean ± SD

2.4 ± 1.7

2.4 ± 1.8

2.6 ± 1.6

0.744

APACHE; mean ± SD

12.5 ± 5.0

12.1 ± 5.0

14.4 ± 5.0

0.142

McCabe (rapidly fatal)

11 (16.4)

9 (16.3)

2 (16.7)

1.000

ICU admission

5 (7.5)

4 (7.3)

1 (8.3)

1.000

Mechanical ventilation

6 (9.0)

5 (9.1)

1 (8.3)

1.000

Previous steroids intake (3 months)

24 (35.8)

20 (36.4)

4 (33.3)

1.000

Previous antibiotics intake (30 days)

28 (41.8)

22 (40.0)

6 (50.0)

0.538

Previous antifungals intake (30 days)

9 (13.4)

7 (12.7)

2 (16.7)

0.658

Antifungals in the present episode

7 (10.4)

2 (3.6)

5 (41.7)

0.001

For patients without aspergillosis, data correspond to episodes with the highest GOLD/APACHE value. Data are expressed as n (%) except where indicated

CT scan was performed in 29.9% patients: 50% of patients developing aspergillosis and 25.5% of those that did not (p = 0.160).

No differences between groups were found in the number of patients receiving antibiotics or antifungals prior to the described episode, with quinolones and voriconazole as most frequent compounds. Antifungal treatment was more frequently administered during the described episode in patients developing aspergillosis (41.7 vs. 3.6%, p = 0.001), being voriconazole the most frequent compound [4 out of 5 (80%) treated-patients developing aspergillosis and 1 out 2 (50%) among those treated-patients that did not]. With respect to previous intake of steroids, doses >20 mg/day had been taken by 3 out of 12 (25.0%) patients developing aspergillosis and 14 out of 55 (25.5%) patients that did not (p = 1.000), with 0% and 12.7% (7/55) patients, respectively, having received cumulative doses >700 mg within the previous three months (p = 0.355). Although non-significant, the percentage of patients developing aspergillosis treated with cumulative doses of 100-700 mg within the previous three months was higher than among those not developing aspergillosis (5 out of 12–41.7%- vs. 11 out of 55–20%-; p = 0.140).

In the subgroup of 47 COPD patients, the percentage of patients developing aspergillosis was 25.5% (12 out of 47), being the percentage of GOLD IV patients significantly higher among patients developing aspergillosis than among those that did not develop aspergillosis (50.0% vs. 26.1%, p = 0.046).

Table 2 details data from patients developing aspergillosis. Most patients were males (75%) and ≥65 years old (83.3%). Diagnoses included six tracheobronchitis (4 invasive and 2 simple tracheobronchitis), four pulmonary disease (2 invasive pulmonary aspergillosis and 2 chronic pulmonary aspergillosis), one ABPA and one pulmonary aspergilloma. Presence of A. fumigatus in lower respiratory tract samples were confirmed at the time of diagnosis (eight patients) or within the previous two months in 10 out of 12 patients with aspergillosis, lacking recent positive culture for an 80-years old GOLD IV patient with invasive tracheobronchitis and the patient with aspergilloma. CT scans performed in six patients showed infiltrates (five patients), nodules (three patients), cavitations (one patient) and pleural effusion (one patient), without halo signs or air crescent signs. No samples for histopathological confirmation were collected in these patients. Mean time to development of aspergillosis was 18.4 months (median: 8.5 months), with a wide range (1–58 months). Figure 1 shows overtime the percentage of patients developing aspergillosis among GOLD II-III patients and GOLD IV patients. Significant differences were found between both groups (p = 0.032).
Table 2

Detailed data from patients with aspergillosis

Patient no.

Gender

Age

GOLD

Time to aspergillosis (months)

Diagnosis

1

Male

70–75

IV

6

Aspergilloma

2

Female

<50

II

16

ABPA

3

Male

60–69

IV

7

CPA

4

Male

>75

II

38

CPA

5

Female

>75

III

29

IPA

6

Male

70–75

IV

3

IPA

7

Male

>75

IV

58

IT

8

Male

>75

II

44

IT

9

Male

60–69

III

10

IT

10

Female

>75

IV

6

IT

11

Male

>75

IV

3

ST

12

Male

60–69

III

1

ST

ABPA Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis; CPA Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis; IPA Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis; IT Invasive tracheobronchitis; ST Simple tracheobronchitis

Fig. 1

Overtime percentage of GOLD II-III and GOLD IV patients developing aspergillosis among the 47 COPD patients

Discussion

Nowadays, approximately 30–50% cases of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis are diagnosed in non-neutropenic patients [15], and pre-existing structural disease of the lungs such as COPD increases the risk for developing invasive pulmonary aspergillosis [16]. A previous study in our country reported 22.1% of probable invasive pulmonary aspergillosis among hospitalized COPD patients with at least one culture positive to Aspergillus [17]. Although several factors (among them, previous colonization, not sufficiently studied) have been identified, no definitive data is available to explain why colonization changes to invasive disease [18] with some patients with COPD developing invasive pulmonary aspergillosis while others do not [15]. The present study, a follow-up study in patients with Aspergillus airway colonization, showed that approximately 18% patients developed aspergillosis, this percentage being higher among patients with COPD (approx. 26%). In the present series, COPD was the sole risk factor in common for our non-transplant, non-neutropenic patients developing aspergillosis, 75% of them presenting GOLD III-IV. Other conditions compromising immune function and reported to increase the risk of acquiring invasive aspergillosis as diabetes mellitus or liver cirrhosis [16] were present in some of the patients developing aspergillosis, but no conclusions can be drawn in our study on colonized patients. Similarly, previous intake of antibiotics and steroids has also been reported as an increased risk for invasive disease [19], but in the present series the percentage of patients that had been treated with antibiotics or high doses of steroids prior to the index episode was similar in both groups, as there are common drugs for patients with COPD exacerbations.

Once tissue invasion has occurred, it is well known that Aspergillus produces a wide range of invasive and saprophytic syndromes [1], A. fumigatus being the main responsible species. This range of diseases was also found in the present study where two patients developed a saprophytic syndrome (aspergilloma and ABPA) and, more important from the prognosis perspective, 50% of patients presented an invasive syndrome. The high mortality rate associated with invasive disease in non-neutropenic critically ill patients has been attributed to difficulties in timely diagnosis due to insensitive and non-specific clinical signs and lack of unequivocal diagnosis criteria [20]. Diagnosis presents special difficulties in COPD patients since the invasiveness of procedures to obtain samples for histopathological confirmation limits the possibility of fungal evidence because these procedures are rarely performed in patients suffering from chronic lung disease as late-stage COPD patients [17, 21]. Therefore, most cases reported in COPD patients are “probable” [21] as occurred in all cases in the present series. In this sense, the difficulty in sample collection in elderly late-stage COPD patients was probably the reason for the lack of a recent positive culture in the 80-years old GOLD IV patient with invasive tracheobronchitis in the present study. However, CT scan and antifungal therapy were markedly more frequent in patients developing aspergillosis than in those that did not. CT scan is indicated in cases of suspicion of Aspergillus involvement, regardless classical radiological findings may be less reliable in non-neutropenic patients [16], as in the present series where none of the patients presented halo or air crescent signs.

To our knowledge, this is the first follow-up study exploring the percentage of colonized patients developing aspergillosis among non-transplant, non-neutropenic patients. Our results showed a percentage of development among COPD patients (25.5%) similar to that reported in pre-transplant colonized cystic fibrosis patients developing invasive aspergillosis after transplantation (24.6%) [5]. In cystic fibrosis patients, Aspergillus colonization is associated with pulmonary exacerbations, and a small subset of patients develops allergic aspergillosis and very rarely invasive aspergillosis [5]. However, after transplantation Aspergillus should not be considered so innocuous since the impaired immunity precipitates invasive syndromes [5].

Our cohort of colonized patients was retrospectively followed to determine not only the percentage of aspergillosis development but also time to development. The duration of the incubation period of invasive aspergillosis remains unknown, probably due to the lack of knowledge regarding time of exposure, duration of previous colonization and the relationship between exposure, colonization and invasion [6]. Considering the lack of specific studies in this field, in the commented study on colonized cystic fibrosis patients, median time from transplantation to infection was 42 days [5]. Time from colonization to infection in our study could be hardly compared with the reported time from transplantation to infection since post-transplant patients receive immunosuppressive agents that precipitates an impaired immunity, making the great difference with COPD patients. Thus, colonization, percentage of patients developing aspergillosis and time to aspergillosis should be necessarily different in COPD patients. In this sense, the lower percentage of patients developing invasive syndromes (6 out of 47, 12.8%) and the larger time to develop aspergillosis (8.5 months median time) among COPD patients in the present study could be related to the absence of induced impair immunity by immunosuppressive agents.

Although this is the largest series of colonized non-transplant, non-neutropenic patients reporting development of aspergillosis, the low number of patients and the retrospective nature of the study (patients managed following daily practice without additional investigational tests) limit the conclusions. The fact that diagnostic criteria were based on those by Bulpa et al. [2] and not on EORTC/MSG definitions [22] could also be considered a potential study limitation, but criteria by Bulpa et al. are commonly used for non-hematological, non-transplant, non-neutropenic patients [17, 23] since EORTC/MSG definitions do not include COPD as host criteria. However, the percentage of patients developing aspergillosis among colonized COPD patients and the multicentre nature of the study deserves attention to study conclusions, regardless the potential variability in daily practice between centres.

Conclusions

The high percentage of cases progressing to aspergillosis among Aspergillus-colonized non-transplant, non-neutropenic patients, especially among patients with COPD, stresses the importance of colonization as risk factor, and creates awareness of the possible change from colonization to invasive disease in GOLD IV patients.

Abbreviations

APACHE II: 

Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation

COPD: 

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

GOLD: 

Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Other members of the Investigator Group are:

I. Campos (H. Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria), A. Flor (H. Althaia Xarxa Assistencial, Manresa), P. Llinares (Complejo Hospitalario de A Coruña, A Coruña), J. Ferreres (H. Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia), L. Fernández-Bermejo (H. Central de la Defensa Gomez Ulla, Madrid), R. Malo (H. Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Madrid), D. del Castillo (H. de Jerez, Jerez de la Frontera, Cadiz), M.A. Sepúlveda (H. Virgen de la Salud, Toledo), P. Ramírez (H. Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Sta. Cruz de Tenerife), F. Garcia-de-la-Llana (Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Badajoz, Badajoz), F. Sanz (H. General Universitario de Valencia), P. Serra (H. Universitario Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona).

Funding

This study was supported by an unrestricted grant from the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine, Madrid, Spain that has received a Medical Education Grant from Pfizer S.L.U., Madrid, Spain. The sponsor had no role in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the article for publication.

Availability of data and materials

Data from patients are recorded in their corresponding medical records at participating hospitals. The anonymous database in SPSS constructed to analyze data supporting the conclusions of this article remains under the responsibility of J. Barberan, corresponding author, that is the guarantor of the availability of data. Authors do not wish to share the data since they are not of their property, but data are available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of the corresponding hospital.

Authors’ contribution

JB, J-JG, M-JG and LA have participated in design, draft and final approval of the article. F-JG-P, VV, AF-V, EM and CS have participated in acquisition of data, critical review of the manuscript and provided approval of the final version. Jose Barberan takes responsibility for (is the guarantor of) the content of the manuscript, including the data and analysis.

Authors’ information

Not applicable.

Competing interests

José Barberán: Has received travel accommodations from Pfizer for ECCMID attendance and conference grants from Pfizer, Novartis and MSD. Francisco-Javier García-Pérez: Has received investigational fees (not for the present study) from Pfizer. Victoria Villena: No competing interests. Alberto Fernández-Villar: Has received travel accommodations from AstraZeneca, GSK, Pfizer, TEVA, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chiesi, Menarini and Rovi for conference/congress attendance, and investigational grants for research projects from AstraZeneca, Menarini and Ferrer. Eduardo Malmierca: No competing interests. Cristina Salas: No competing interests. María-José Giménez: Has received travel accommodations from Pfizer for ECCMID attendance. Juan-José Granizo: No competing interests. Lorenzo Aguilar: No competing interests.

Consent to publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hospital Universitario Monteprincipe, Madrid, Spain.

The need for consent to participate was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study based on information in medical records.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Internal Medicine Dpt., Hospital Universitario Monteprincipe, Universidad San Pablo-CEU
(2)
Pneumology Dpt., Hospital Universitario de la Princesa
(3)
Pneumology Dpt., Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
(4)
Pneumology Dpt., Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo
(5)
Internal Medicine Dpt., Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofia
(6)
Internal Medicine Dpt., Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla
(7)
PRISM-AG
(8)
Preventive Medicine, Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina

References

  1. Hope WW, Walsh TJ, Denning DW. The invasive and saprophytic syndromes due to Aspergillus spp. Med Mycol. 2005;43 Suppl 1:S207–38.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bulpa P, Dive A, Sibille Y. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur Respir J. 2007;30:782–800.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Barberan J, Alcazar B, Malmierca E, Garcia de la Llana F, Dorca J, Del Castillo D, Villena V, Hernandez-Febles M, Garcia-Perez FJ, Granizo JJ, Gimenez MJ, Aguilar L, ASP Investigator Group. Repeated Aspergillus isolation in respiratory samples from non-immunocompromised patients not selected based on clinical diagnoses: colonisation or infection? BMC Infect Dis. 2012;12:295.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Barberan J, Sanz F, Hernandez JL, Merlos S, Malmierca E, Garcia-Perez FJ, Sanchez-Haya E, Segarra M, GarciadelaLlana F, Granizo JJ, Gimenez MJ, Aguilar L. Clinical features of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis vs. colonization in COPD patients distributed by gold stage. J Infect. 2012;65:447–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Luong ML, Chaparro C, Stephenson A, Rotstein C, Singer LG, Waters V, Azad S, Keshavjee S, Tullis E, Husain S. Pretransplant Aspergillus colonization of cystic fibrosis patients and the incidence of post-lung transplant invasive aspergillosis. Transplantation. 2014;97:351–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bénet T, Voirin N, Nicolle MC, Picot S, Michallet M, Vanhems P. Estimation of the incubation period of invasive aspergillosis by survival models in acute myeloid leukemia patients. Med Mycol. 2013;51:214–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47:1245–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Fernandez R, Baigorri F, Navarro G, Artigas A. A modified McCabe score for stratification of patients after intensive care unit discharge: the Sabadell score. Crit Care. 2006;10(6):R179.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Pauwels RA, Buist AS, Calverley PM, Jenkins CR, Hurd SS, GOLD Scientific Committee. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. NHLBI/WHO global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease (GOLD) workshop summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;163:1256–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Barberán J, Sánchez-Haya E, del Castillo D, Sanz F, Alcázar B, Malmierca E, nvestigator Group ASP. Report of 38 cases of tracheobronchitis in non-immunocompromised patients with dual isolation of Aspergillus in lower respiratory tract samples. Rev Esp Quimioter. 2014;27:110–4.Google Scholar
  12. Muñoz P, Guinea J, Bouza E. Update on invasive aspergillosis: clinical and diagnostic aspects. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006;12 Suppl 7:24–39.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Buckingham SJ, Hansell DM. Aspergillus in the lung: diverse and coincident forms. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:1786–800.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Agarwal R, Chakrabarti A, Shah A, Gupta D, Meis JF, Guleria R, Moss R, Denning DW, ABPA complicating asthma ISHAM working group. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis: review of literature and proposal of new diagnostic and classification criteria. Clin Exp Allergy. 2013;43:850–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Valle JM, González-Barcala FJ, Alvarez-Dobaño JM, Valdés L. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [Article in Spanish]. Rev Med Chil. 2010;138:612–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaiser P, Thurnheer R, Moll C, Frauchiger B, Rochat P, Krause M. Invasive aspergillosis in non-neutropenic patients. Eur J Intern Med. 2009;20:e131–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Guinea J, Torres-Narbona M, Gijón P, Muñoz P, Pozo F, Peláez T, de Miguel J, Bouza E. Pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: incidence, risk factors, and outcome. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010;16:870–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Samarakoon P, Soubani A. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with COPD: a report of five cases and systematic review of the literature. Chron Respir Dis. 2008;5:19–27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Muquim A, Dial S, Menzies D. Invasive aspergillosis in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases. Can Respir J. 2005;12:199–204.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Trof RJ, Beishuizen A, Debets-Ossenkopp YJ, Girbes AR, Groeneveld AB. Management of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in non-neutropenic critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33:1694–703.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Ader F. Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: an emerging fungal disease. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2010;12:409–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. De Pauw B, Walsh TJ, Donnelly JP, Stevens DA, Edwards JE, Calandra T, Pappas PG, Maertens J, Lortholary O, Kauffman CA, Denning DW, Patterson TF, Maschmeyer G, Bille J, Dismukes WE, Herbrecht R, Hope WW, Kibbler CC, Kullberg BJ, Marr KA, Muñoz P, Odds FC, Perfect JR, Restrepo A, Ruhnke M, Segal BH, Sobel JD, Sorrell TC, Viscoli C, Wingard JR, Zaoutis T, Bennett JE, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the european organization for research and treatment of cancer/invasive fungal infections cooperative group and the national institute of allergy and infectious diseases mycoses study group (EORTC/MSG) consensus group. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:1813–21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Castón JJ, Linares MJ, Rivero A, Casal M, Torre-Cisneros J. Clinical factors associated with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with chronic pneumopathies and respiratory isolation of Aspergillus spp. Med Clin (Barc). 2012;139:668–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement