Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The prevalence of drug resistance among treatment-naïve HIV-1-infected individuals in China during pre- and post- 2004

  • Hanping Li1,
  • Shuai Chang2, 3,
  • Yang Han4,
  • Daomin Zhuang1,
  • Lin Li1,
  • Yongjian Liu1,
  • Siyang Liu1,
  • Zuoyi Bao1,
  • Wenfu Zhang2,
  • Hongbin Song2,
  • Taisheng Li4Email author and
  • Jingyun Li1Email author
Contributed equally
BMC Infectious DiseasesBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:605

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1928-x

Received: 2 December 2015

Accepted: 13 October 2016

Published: 26 October 2016

Abstract

Background

The widespread use of antiretroviral therapies has led to considerable concerns about the prevalence of drug-resistant, as transmission of drug-resistant (TDR) strains poses a challenge for the control of the HIV-1 epidemic.

Methods

We conducted an epidemiological study enrolling treatment-naïve HIV-1-positive subjects at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital since 1991. Drug resistance was determined by submitting the sequences to the Stanford University Network HIV-1 database.

Results

Of 521 participants, 478 samples were amplified and sequenced successfully. HIV Transmitted drug resistance prevalence in China was determined to be 6.7 %. We did not find significant differences in the TDR rate by demographic characteristics. No significant time trend in the prevalence of overall TDR was observed (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

We identified an intermediate prevalence of transmitted drug resistance (TDR), exhibiting a stable time trend. These findings enhance our understanding of HIV-1 drug resistance prevalence and time trend, and provide some guidelines for the comprehensive public health strategy of TDR prevention.

Keywords

HIV Prevalence Treatment-naïve Transmitted drug resistance Antiretroviral therapy

Background

The “Four Frees and One Care” policy implemented in China in 2003, which provided free antiretroviral (ARV) drugs, has been credited for significantly reducing the rate of morbidity and mortality attributed to HIV infection in the country [1, 2]. By August 31st 2013, HIV-1 patients living in 31 provinces and 2215 counties had received antiretroviral therapy (ART) and greatly benefited from this program. The accumulative total of treatment-experienced patients was 234,655, with 188,126 being treated in China.

Characterized by a high replication rate [3] and the error-prone reverse transcriptase [4, 5], HIV-1 is extensively genetically diverse. Like those in developed countries, the emergence and transmission of drug-resistant HIV-1 strains is of considerable concern with the widespread use of ART in developing countries. It has been reported that many treated patients developed resistance to a specific drug within a class or an entire class of ART drugs [6], which may lead to treatment failure and limitation of alteration of treatment regimen. Furthermore, transmitted drug resistance (TDR), which is the transmission of drug-resistant variants to individuals who have never undergone ART can occur. TDR can compromise the efficacy of combination ARV regimens in the management of HIV disease, becoming a major obstacle to ART. The prevalence of TDR varies worldwide ranging from 3.2 % to 24.1 % [2, 722]. In China, free therapy was provided to AIDS patients in 2004, which means that there might be transmission of drug-resistant variants. Some reports have demonstrated the increasing TDR rate [22, 23]. So in this study we focused on the compare of the prevalent ratio of drug-resistant variants before and after 2004 in China to provide some guidelines for the TDR prevention.

Methods

Patient samples

Plasma specimens were collected from HIV-1 treatment-naïve patients enrolled in the Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Participants had received no antiretroviral drugs at the time of sampling. The patients recruited in this study were AIDS stage for their CD4 cells being below 350 counts per microlitre and viral load exceeding 103 log. Plasma samples were shipped on dry ice and stored at -80 °C until analysis. All patients provided a written informed consent and their basic personal and clinical information was acquired by face to face interview. A total of 521 patients were enrolled, and this study was approved by the Ethics Committee at the Institutional Review Board of the Academy of Military Medical Sciences.

Genotypic resistance testing

Nested PCR was employed to amplify the 2161 bp HIV-1 gag-pol gene which comprised the entire PR gene (codons 1–99) and RT gene (codons 1–560). HIV-1 RNA was extracted from 500 μl plasma using the QIAamp® Viral RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen) and used as a template for a one-step reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The RT-PCR primers were [MAW26: 5’-TTGGAAATGTGGAAAGGAAGGAC-3’; Vif: 5’-TGACTTTGGGGATTGTAGGGAATA-3’]. The one-step RT-PCR reaction mixture (One Step RNA PCR Kit (AMV), Takara) contained 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dNTP, 10X One Step RNA PCR Buffer (5 μl), 40 U RNase Inhibitor, 5 U AMV RTase XL, 5 U AMV-optimized Taq, 20 μM (each) primer and 2 μl of viral RNA, for a final volume of 50 μl. Two microliters of the RT-PCR mixture was used for nested PCR, with 1.25 U Premix Ex Taq (Premix Ex TaqTM Version 2.0, Takara) and 20 μM (each) primer [PRO-1: 5’-CAGAGCCAACAGCCCCACCA-3’; RTO-2: 5’-TAAAATCACTAGCCATTGCTCTCC-3’, respectively] combined to a total volume of 50 μl. Both one-step RT-PCR and nested PCR amplifications were carried out in a Biometra Thermocycler (Biometra). The patient-derived PR-RT PCR products were directly sequenced with pyrosequencing method by the Huada Genomics Company (China). The sequences were edited using the ContigExpress software and aligned using the BioEdit program. For each patient, genotypic resistance was determined by submitting the sequences to the Stanford University Network HIV-1 database [24].

Subtype identification

Subtype was determined by phylogenetic tree analysis of the PR-RT fragments. Alignments also included the reference sequences representing HIV-1 genetic circulating recombinant forms obtained from the HIV Database [25]. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the Neighbor-Joining method by MEGA (Molecular Evolutionary Genetic Analysis Software, Version 5.4) and genetic distance reliability was evaluated using the bootstrap test (500 bootstrap replicates).

Statistical analysis

Fisher test analysis was performed using SAS version 9.2. All analyses were performed using a two-tailed test and p values less than 0.05 were defined as statistically significant.

Results

Patient characteristics

The Peking Union Medical College Hospital provided subjects from a widespread referral network within each of 8 provinces and metropolitan cities across China (Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Fuzhou, Henan, Yunnan, and Xi’an) who were treatment-naïve at the time of sampling. A total of 521 subjects infected with HIV-1 during the period 1991–2009 were evaluated; and 491 (94.2 %) of the subjects were from 2005 to 2009. The 28 samples in year 1999–2004 are mainly from Henan (17/28, 60.7 %). Table 1 summarizes demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population. The average age was 35.49 ± 10.01 (18–65 years) and males dominated the study population (69.3 %). More than half (77.9 %) of patients were infected by sexual contact, of which 214 (41.1 %) was through heterosexual contact and 182 (34.9 %) through sex between men. The mean HIV viral RNA load was 4.54 log copies/ml.
Table 1

Demographic and clinical characteristics of HIV-1+ patients

Patients, no.

521

Age, mean(min-max)

35.49(18-65)

Sex, no.(%)

 Male

361(69.3)

 Female

126(24.2)

 Unknown

34(6.5)

Area of origin, no.(%)

 Beijing

112(21.5)

 Yunnan

95(18.2)

 Shanghai

75(14.4)

 Henan

60(11.5)

 Fuzhou

52(10.0)

 Shenzhen

51(9.8)

 Guangzhou

50(9.6)

 Xi’an

26(5.0)

Route of transmission, no.(%)

 Heterosexual contact

214(41.1)

 Men who have sex with men

182(34.9)

 Blood

47(9.0)

 Bisexual

10(1.9)

 Unknown

68(13.1)

Year of plasma collection

 1991-2004

30(5.8)

 2005-2009

491(94.2)

 HIV-RNA load mean(SD), log copies/ml

4.54(0.75)

Genetic subtypes

Based on RT-PCR and sequencing results, 478 (478/521) samples were amplified and sequenced successfully (GenBank accession numbers KU050197 - KU050674). A neighbor-joining tree of isolates in our program was constructed to determine subtype of each isolate and sequence relatedness. Subtyping assessment results revealed that substantial proportions of the study samples were CRF01_AE (40.0 %, 191/478) and subtype B (23.2 %, 111/478). Other subtypes included CRF07_BC (14.2 %, 68/478), CRF08_BC (8.4 %, 40/478) and subtype C (1.3 %, 6/478). Two (0.42 %, 2/478) CRF02_AG and one (0.21 %, 1/478) CRF06_CPX were also found. Figure 1 shows the distribution of the subtypes. Of these patients who were infected by sexual contact, most were CRF01_AE (44.2 %, 165/373), subtype B (16.4 %, 61/373) and CRF_07BC (16.1 %, 60/373); whereas the most common subtype among patients exposed to HIV-infected blood was subtype B (74.4 %, 32/43; Table 2).
Fig. 1

Distribution of HIV-1 subtypes and recombinants. The area of every section indicates the proportion of the subtypes and recombinants. UK: unknown

Table 2

Prevalence of subtype among HIV_1+ patients infected by different route of transmissions

Route of transmission

B

C

CRF_01AE

CRF_07BC

CRF_08BC

Other

Total

Sexual contact

61(16.4)

3(0.1)

165(44.2)

60(16.1)

36 (9.7)

48(12.9)

373

Blood

32(74.4)

0(0.0)

2(4.7)

1(2.3)

2(4.7)

6(14.0)

43

Other

18(29.0)

3(4.8)

24(38.7)

7(29.2)

2(3.2)

8(12.9)

62

Total

111(23.2)

6(1.3)

191(10.0)

68(14.2)

40(8.4)

62(13.0)

478

Resistance analysis

All of the fragment sequences were translated and compared with the consensus B sequence in the Stanford University Network HIV-1 database [25]. A total of 32 (6.7 %) of 478 cases were found to harbor HIV-1 strains with at least one major drug-resistant mutation conferred by nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), or protease inhibitors (PIs), of whom 28 patients had mutations associated with reduced susceptibility to one ARV drug (Fig. 2). There was no significant difference (p > 0.05) in the prevalence of drug-resistant mutations among NRTIs (12/32), NNRTIs (11/32) and PIs (13/32). In addition, a substantial proportion of cases (9/11, 81.8 %) were highly resistant to NNRTIs, while only one case (1/12, 8.3 %), and 3 cases (3/13, 23.1 %) were highly resistant to NRTIs and PIs respectively, with a significant difference (p = 0.0050). The most commonly observed NNRTI resistance associated mutations were K103N (15.6 %, 5/32) and Y181C (12.5 %, 4/32). Of 13 cases resistant to PIs, 12 cases were resistant to Nelfinavir (NFV) resistance.
Fig. 2

Resistance to different antiviral drugs in HIV-1-infected, antiretroviral therapy-naïve patients. The columns represent the various drugs and the column height indicates the number of the cases

Comparison of the resistant rate in two major risk groups revealed that there was no significant difference (p > 0.05) between sexually infected individuals (28/373, 7.5 %) and patients infected by blood transfusions (3/43, 7.0 %). In addition, we did not find a significant difference in resistance in patients infected through heterosexual contact versus homosexual contact (p > 0.05). The prevalence of resistance in male and female was 8.1 % and 2.7 %, respectively (p > 0.05). Shenzhen had the highest rate of drug resistance at 11.6 %, and there was no significant difference (p > 0.05) among these regions (Table 3). There were different prevalence of resistance among subtype B, CRF_01AE and CRF_07BC/08BC (p = 0.0037). The susceptibility of CRF01_AE was significantly higher than subtype B (p = 0.0030).
Table 3

Drug resistance by demographic and clinical characteristics

Character

Number of patients who were successfully sequenced

Number of genotypic drug resistant patients (%)

Gender

 Male

345

28(8.1)

 Female

110

3(2.7)

 Unknown

23

1(0.2)

Area of origin

 Beijing

108

11(10.2)

 Shanghai

74

3(4.1)

 Guangzhou

48

2(4.2)

 Shenzhen

43

5(11.6)

 Fuzhou

51

4(7.8)

 Henan

54

3(5.6)

 Yunnan

74

2(2.7)

 Xi’an

26

2(7.7)

Route of transmission

 Men who have sex with men

174

17(9.8)

 Heterosexual contact

189

10(5.3)

 Bisexual

10

1(10.0)

 Blood

43

3(7.0)

 Unknown

62

1(1.6)

Year of plasma collection

 1991-2004

28

2(7.1)

 2005-2009

450

30(6.7)

As a result of the introduction of free ART in 2004, we compared the resistance between the two periods. No significant difference (p > 0.05) on resistance was observed in the 1991–2004 (2/28, 7.1 %) period and 2005–2009 (30/450, 6.7 %) period. And there is also no difference in TDR prevalence between the two periods in each origins (p > 0.05). Additionally, the differences on resistance to NRTIs, NNRTIs and PIs between the two periods were not statistically significant (p > 0.05, Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

The time-dependent trend in any class of TDR. The orange columns represent the TDR in 1991-2004, and the blue columns represent that in 2005-2009. The column height indicates the number of the cases

Discussion

We report here the drug susceptibility of 521 treatment-naïve HIV-1-infected individuals at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital from 1991 to 2009. Four hundred and seventy eight gag-pol gene sequences (478/521) were sequenced successfully and the results of subtype and genetic resistance were obtained.

Various HIV-1 strains have been identified in China, of which CRF07_BC, CRF01_AE, CRF08_BC, and B/B’are the most common. Other reported strains include subtype G, subtype C, CRF55_01B and numerous unique recombinant forms (URFs) [26, 27]. Various HIV-1 subtypes/CRFs have been disseminated among different high risk populations. Our findings found that the most common subtype was CRF01_AE among the patients who were infected by sexual contact, and subtype B was found to circulate mainly in the blood-borne transmission population, which were consistent with previous Chinese studies [28, 29]. In the present study, we found that the main route of transmission remained blood-born route for the subjects in Henan province, of which subtype B was dominant, as a result of HIV infection outbreak in the mid-1990s in paid blood donors in Henan.

Our studies determined that the TDR prevalence in China was 6.7 %, a level classified as “intermediate” according to the WHO thresholds, and which was slightly lower than that observed in some industrialized countries. In the present study, we found no significant differences in the presence of TDR by demographic characteristic, which was similar with a previous study [8]. Here we showed that there was no significant difference in the prevalence of drug-resistant mutations among the three antiretroviral classes (PI, 2.7 %; NRTI, 2.5 %; and NNRTI, 2.3 %). In addition, we noted that the prevalence of HIV-1 strains with high level of resistance mutations to NNRTIs were significantly higher than those to NRTIs and PIs (p < 0.0050). The higher prevalence may be related to mutations associated with decreased susceptibility to NNRTIs with a low genetic barrier, which are rapidly generated and emerge early in the selection process [30].

It is known that there is an approximate 8–10 % genetic diversity exists in pol gene among various subtypes; therefore drug resistance susceptibility of genotype virus may be different. Here we showed a strong association between the prevalence of TDR and subtypes. There was different prevalence of resistance among subtype B, CRF_01AE and CRF_07BC/08BC. Resistance was significantly higher in ARV-naïve patients who were infected with subtype B than in those infected with CRF01_AE viruses (p = 0.0030), which was similar with previously published studies [1719, 31, 32]. Although subtypes may vary in mutational pathways, it is unclear whether subtype B was more prone to mutation [33]. As the predominant prevalence in China, HIV-1 subtype B viruses have been exposed to ARV drugs for a longer period than other subtypes [26, 34].

This study was performed on ART-naïve individuals. It has been reported that resistance testing prior to the initiation of treatment in untreated populations with HIV infection is cost-effective and may be beneficial to the patient [35, 36]. It is commonly considered that resistant HIV-1 variants in ART-naïve patients are transmitted from ART-experienced patients or other ART-naïve individuals with drug-resistant strains. There are some studies indicating that drug resistant mutations among treatment-naïve patients were associated with ART used prior to and early in the HAART era [16]. As the ART use has been extended in China in recent years, it becomes increasingly important to monitor HIV-1 genetic diversity and TDR. Hence, we also tested whether the free ART program, which was implemented in 2003, has influenced the prevalence of overall TDR among ART-naïve patients in China. It should be noted that contrary to the reports from other countries that have implemented broad-access programs to ART [37, 38], results of our analysis showed that there was no time-dependent trend in the overall TDR, origins, or in any class of drug resistance. Although we did not observe evidence of an increasing prevalence of TDR over years in the sampling patients, the number of HIV-1-infected individuals in our study may be small.

While we did not study a random sample of HIV-1-infected individuals, this was a large, diverse population with a wide time span from a widespread referral network in China, and our study well reflects the time trend and demographic characteristics of TDR.

Conclusions

In summary, in this study, we fulfilled the comprehensive investigation on the circulation of TDR of three ARV classes in China. The overall prevalence of TDR remains intermediate in ART-naïve individuals, and has a stable TDR time trend. These findings enhance our understanding of HIV-1 drug resistance prevalence and time trend, and provide some guidelines for proposing efficacious and effective programs to prevent transmission of HIV-1drug resistant strains.

Abbreviations

ART: 

Antiretroviral therapy

ARV: 

Antiretroviral

CRF: 

Circulating recombinant form

HIV: 

Human immunodeficiency virus

NNRTIs: 

Nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors

NRTIs: 

Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors

PIs: 

Protease inhibitors

TDR: 

Transmitted drug resistance

URF: 

Unique recombinant form

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We thank the patients who participate in the study; and the physicians and nurses for excellent patient care.

Funding

This study was funded by The National Key S&T Special Projects on Major Infectious Disease grant (2012ZX10001-002).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets during and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

HL and SC conceived this study, analyze data, and drafted the manuscript. YH collected samples. DZ, LL, YL, SL, and ZB carried out the sequence alignment, and edit manuscript. WZ and HS participated in the design of the study, and check all data. TL and JL conceived the study, and participated in its design and coordination. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Academy of Military Medical Science ethics committee that approved the study.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, Academy of Military Medical Science
(2)
Institute of Disease Control and Prevention, Academy of Military Medical Science
(3)
Department of Clinical Laboratory, PLA Army General Hospital
(4)
Department of Infectious Disease, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

References

  1. He N, Detels R. The HIV epidemic in China: history, response, and challenge. Cell Res. 2005;15(11-12):825–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Zhang FJ, Dou ZH, Yu L, Xu JH, Jiao JH, Wang N, Ma Y, Zhao Y, Zhao HX, Chen RY. The effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy on mortality among HIV-infected former plasma donors in China. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47(6):825–33.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Haase AT. Population biology of HIV-1 infection: viral and CD4+ T cell demographics and dynamics in lymphatic tissues. Annu Rev Immunol. 1999;17:625–56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Preston BD, Poiesz BJ, Loeb LA. Fidelity of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase. Science. 1988;242(4882):1168–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Roberts JD, Bebenek K, Kunkel TA. The accuracy of reverse transcriptase from HIV-1. Science. 1988;242(4882):1171–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Larder BA, Darby G, Richman DD. HIV with reduced sensitivity to zidovudine (AZT) isolated during prolonged therapy. Science. 1989;243(4899):1731–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Vercauteren J, Wensing AMJ, van de Vijver DAMC, Albert J, Balotta C, Hamouda O, Kucherer C, Struck D, Schmit JC, Asjo B, et al. Transmission of Drug-Resistant HIV-1 Is Stabilizing in Europe. J Infect Dis. 2009;200(10):1503–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Wheeler WH, Ziebell RA, Zabina H, Pieniazek D, Prejean J, Bodnar UR, Mahle KC, Heneine W, Johnson JA, Hall HI. Prevalence of transmitted drug resistance associated mutations and HIV-1 subtypes in new HIV-1 diagnoses, U.S.-2006. AIDS. 2010;24(8):1203–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Yerly S, von Wyl V, Ledergerber B, Boni J, Schupbach J, Burgisser P, Klimkait T, Rickenbach M, Kaiser L, Gunthard HF, et al. Transmission of HIV-1 drug resistance in Switzerland: a 10-year molecular epidemiology survey. AIDS. 2007;21(16):2223–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ross L, Lim ML, Liao Q, Wine B, Rodriguez AE, Weinberg W, Shaefer M. Prevalence of antiretroviral drug resistance and resistance-associated mutations in antiretroviral therapy-naive HIV-infected individuals from 40 United States cities. HIV Clin Trials. 2007;8(1):1–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Truong HHM, Kellogg TA, McFarland W, Louie B, Klausner JD, Philip SS, Grant RM. Sentinel surveillance of HIV-1 transmitted drug resistance, acute infection and recent infection. Plos ONE. 2011;6(10):e25281.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Chaix ML, Descamps D, Wirden M, Bocket L, Delaugerre C, Tamalet C, Schneider V, Izopet J, Masquelier B, Rouzioux C, et al. Stable frequency of HIV-1 transmitted drug resistance in patients at the time of primary infection over 1996-2006 in France. AIDS. 2009;23(6):717–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Frentz D, Boucher CA, van de Vijver DA. Temporal changes in the epidemiology of transmission of drug-resistant HIV-1 across the world. AIDS Rev. 2012;14(1):17–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Grgic I, Lepej SZ, Lunar MM, Poljak M, Vince A, Vrakela IB, Planinic A, Seme K, Begovac J. The prevalence of transmitted drug resistance in newly diagnosed HIV-infected individuals in Croatia: The role of transmission clusters of men who have sex with men carrying the T215S surveillance drug resistance mutation. Aids Res Hum Retrov. 2013;29(2):329–36.Google Scholar
  15. Castor D, Low A, Evering T, Karmon S, Davis B, Figueroa A, LaMar M, Garmon D, Mehandru S, Markowitz M. Transmitted drug resistance and phylogenetic relationships among acute and early HIV-1-infected individuals in New York City. Jaids J Acq Imm Def. 2012;61(1):1–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Hattori J, Shiino T, Gatanaga H, Yoshida S, Watanabe D, Minami R, Sadamasu K, Kondo M, Mori H, Ueda M, et al. Trends in transmitted drug-resistant HIV-1 and demographic characteristics of newly diagnosed patients: nationwide surveillance from 2003 to 2008 in Japan. Antiviral Res. 2010;88(1):72–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Chan PA, Kantor R. Transmitted drug resistance in nonsubtype B HIV-1 infection. HIV Ther. 2009;3(5):447–65.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Pineda-Pena AC, Schrooten Y, Vinken L, Ferreira F, Li G, Trovao NS, Khouri R, Derdelinckx I, De Munter P, Kucherer C, et al. Trends and predictors of transmitted drug resistance (TDR) and clusters with TDR in a local Belgian HIV-1 epidemic. Plos ONE. 2014;9(7):e101738.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Frange P, Assoumou L, Descamps D, Cheret A, Goujard C, Tran L, Gousset M, Avettand-Fenoel V, Bocket L, Fafi-Kremer S, et al. HIV-1 subtype B-infected MSM may have driven the spread of transmitted resistant strains in France in 2007-12: impact on susceptibility to first-line strategies. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015;70(7):2084–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Li G, Liang S, Harrison TJ, Tang Z, Shen Z, Wang X, Wu X, Liu W, Liang F, Feng L, et al. Prevalence of transmitted HIV-1 drug resistance remains low in Guangxi, China, eight years after scale-up of highly-active antiretroviral therapy. Intervirology. 2014;57(5):270–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Yerly S, Kaiser L, Race E, Bru JP, Clavel F, Perrin L. Transmission of antiretroviral-drug-resistant HIV-1 variants. Lancet. 1999;354(9180):729–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Liao L, Xing H, Shang H, Li J, Zhong P, Kang L, Cheng H, Si X, Jiang S, Li X, et al. The prevalence of transmitted antiretroviral drug resistance in treatment-naive HIV-infected individuals in China. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010;53 Suppl 1:S10–14.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Liao L, Xing H, Dong Y, Qin G, Ma Y, Lu H, Chen L, Zhang L, Osborne C, Seguy N, et al. Surveys of transmitted HIV drug resistance in 7 geographic Regions in China, 2008-2009. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54 Suppl 4:S320–323.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Stanford University Network HIV-1 database; 2016. http://hivdb.stanford.edu. Accessed 24 Oct 2016.
  25. HIV Database. 2016. http://www.hiv.lanl.gov. Accessed 24 Oct 2016.
  26. He X, Xing H, Ruan Y, Hong K, Cheng C, Hu Y, Xin R, Wei J, Feng Y, Hsi JH, et al. A comprehensive mapping of HIV-1 genotypes in various risk groups and regions across China based on a nationwide molecular epidemiologic survey. Plos ONE. 2012;7(10):e47289.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Han X, An M, Zhang W, Cai W, Chen X, Takebe Y, Shang H. Genome Sequences of a Novel HIV-1 Circulating Recombinant Form, CRF55_01B, Identified in China. Genome Announc. 2013, 1(1). doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00050-12.
  28. Zhang LQ, Chen ZW, Cao YZ, Yu J, Li GH, Yu WJ, Yin N, Mel S, Li L, Balfe P, et al. Molecular characterization of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and hepatitis C virus in paid blood donors and injection drug users in China. J Virol. 2004;78(24):13591–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Chen M, Ma YL, Duan S, Xing H, Yao ST, Su YZ, Luo HB, Yang L, Chen HC, Fu LR, et al. Genetic diversity and drug resistance among newly diagnosed and antiretroviral treatment-naive HIV-infected individuals in western Yunnan: a hot area of viral recombination in China. BMC Infect Dis. 2012;12:382.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhang Z, Hamatake R, Hong Z. Clinical utility of current NNRTIs and perspectives of new agents in this class under development. Antivir Chem Chemother. 2004;15(3):121–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Wensing AM, van de Vijver DA, Angarano G, Asjo B, Balotta C, Boeri E, Camacho R, Chaix ML, Costagliola D, De Luca A, et al. Prevalence of drug-resistant HIV-1 variants in untreated individuals in Europe: implications for clinical management. J Infect Dis. 2005;192(6):958–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Li Y, Gu L, Han Y, Xie J, Wang H, Lv W, Song X, Li Y, Iwamoto A, Ishida T, et al. HIV-1 subtype B/B' and baseline drug resistance mutation are associated with virologic failure: a multicenter cohort study in China. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015;68(3):289–97.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Brenner BG. Resistance and viral subtypes: how important are the differences and why do they occur? Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2007;2(2):94–102.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Su B, Liu L, Wang F, Gui X, Zhao M, Tien P, Zhang L, Chen Z. HIV-1 subtype B' dictates the AIDS epidemic among paid blood donors in the Henan and Hubei provinces of China. Aids. 2003;17(17):2515–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Weinstein MC, Goldie SJ, Losina E, Cohen CJ, Baxter JD, Zhang H, Kimmel AD, Freedberg KA. Use of genotypic resistance testing to guide HIV therapy: Clinical impact and cost-effectiveness. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134(6):440–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Sendi P, Gunthard HF, Simcock M, Ledergerber B, Schupbach J, Battegay M. Cost-effectiveness of genotypic antiretroviral resistance testing in HIV-infected patients with treatment failure. Plos ONE. 2007;2(1):e173.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Cane P, Chrystie I, Dunn D, Evans B, Geretti AM, Green H, Phillips A, Pillay D, Porter K, Pozniak A, et al. Time trends in primary resistance to HIV drugs in the United Kingdom: multicentre observational study. BMJ. 2005;331(7529):1368.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Little SJ, Holte S, Routy J-P, Daar ES, Markowitz M, Collier AC, Koup RA, Mellors JW, Connick E, Conway B, et al. Antiretroviral-Drug Resistance among Patients Recently Infected with HIV. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(6):385–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement